ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

18
D8.1: Quantity of access offered Author: Eliza Papaki, Nephelie Chatzidiakou, Costis Dallas, Eleni Afiontzi, Agiatis Benardou, Panos Constantopoulos, Dimtris Gavrilis, Leonidas Papachristopoulos, Christos Papatheodorou Digital Curation Unit, ATHENA RC, Panagiotis Karioris, ILSP, ATHENA RC Ariadne is funded by the European Commission’s 7th Framework Programme.

Transcript of ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

Page 1: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

D8.1: Quantity of access offered

Author: Eliza Papaki, Nephelie Chatzidiakou, Costis Dallas, Eleni Afiontzi, Agiatis Benardou, Panos Constantopoulos, Dimtris Gavrilis, Leonidas Papachristopoulos,Christos PapatheodorouDigital Curation Unit, ATHENA RC,

Panagiotis Karioris, ILSP, ATHENA RC

Ariadne is funded by the European Commission’s 7th Framework Programme.

Page 2: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

Theviewsandopinionsexpressedinthisreportarethesoleresponsibilityoftheauthor(s)anddonotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsoftheEuropeanCommission.

ARIADNED8.1(Public)

Version:2.0(final) 14thNovember2016

Authors: ElizaPapaki1,NephelieChatzidiakou1,CostisDallas1,

EleniAfiontzi1,AgiatisBenardou1,PanosConstantopoulos1,DimtrisGavrilis1,PanagiotisKarioris2,LeonidasPapachristopoulos1,ChristosPapatheodorou1

DigitalCurationUnit,ATHENARC1

ILSP,ATHENARC2

DocumentHistory: • 27.07.2016–DraftVersion0.1Initialversionofthedocument

• 01.09.2016–DraftVersion0.2

• 08.09.2016–Revisedversionofthedocumentsubmittedtotheprojectco-ordinatorforinternalqualitycontrol

• 2.9.2016–DeliveryofdrafttoUoYADSforqualitycontrolreview

• 18.10.2016–Draftreturnedbyreviewer

• 14.11.2016–Finalrevisiondeliveredbyauthortotheprojectco-ordinator

Page 3: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

ARIADNED8.1(Public/Restricted)

3

TableofContents

TableofContents..............................................................................................................3

ExecutiveSummary...........................................................................................................4

1 IntroductionandObjectives.........................................................................................5

2 ARIADNESummerSchools...........................................................................................62.1Year1(June29-July3,2015):Emergingdigitalpracticesinarchaeologicalresearch................62.1.1Participants................................................................................................................................62.1.2Programme................................................................................................................................82.2Year2(June13–17,2016):Digitalcurationofarchaeologicalknowledge..................................92.2.1Participants..............................................................................................................................102.2.2Programme..............................................................................................................................11

3Evaluationandresults..................................................................................................13

4Conclusion....................................................................................................................16

Page 4: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

ARIADNED8.1(Public/Restricted)

4

ExecutiveSummaryThisdeliverabledescribesthetransnationalaccessactivitiescarriedoutduringthethirdandfourthyearoftheARIADNEproject(2015-2016)withinWorkPackage8(WP8)bytheDigitalCurationUnit,ATHENARC(Greece).Itdescribestheprogrammeandobjectivesofthesetrainingactivities,andtheparticipants’profilesandfeedback.Thefirstactivitywasaweek-longSummerSchool,organizedinAthensbetween29Juneand3July2015on“Emergingdigitalpracticesinarchaeologicalresearch”,toenable researchersandprofessionals inarchaeology toengagewithcuttingedgeandemergingdigitalpracticeswithinarchaeologicalresearch,rangingfromnewmethodstocapture,organiseandcurate archaeological resources and data to new approaches of archaeological interpretation anddissemination,mediated by digital infrastructures. The second activity, organised in collaborationwith theFacultyof Informationof theUniversityofTorontoandtheDepartmentof InformaticsoftheAthensUniversityofEconomicsandBusiness,wasaweek-longSummerSchoolonthetopicof"Digitalcurationofarchaeologicalknowledge",conductedinAthensbetween13and17June2016.Both summer schools attracted TNA scholars and other archaeological researchers of all levels ofexperience,frompostgraduatestudentstoprofessors,engagingthemwithaspectsoftheARIADNEdigital infrastructure based on their individual research projects and challenges of using digitalmethods,resourcesandtools.Theybothinvolvedaninternationalfacultycomplementingthelocalteam of Digital Curation Unit experts, and consisted of two modules:a) a training school (threedays),basedonacombinationofseminarsandhands-onworkshops,andb)anexpertforum(twodays), in which transnational access participants were invited to interact with experts on digitalarchaeologicalmethods, datasets and curation on planning aspects of using digital archaeologicalinfrastructures.Thirteen researchers, attached to institutions from seven European countries, participated in thetwo summer schools as transnational access scholars, receiving bursaries of 1000 Euros to covertravelandsubsistencecosts.Participantsreportedthattheybenefitedfromnewlearningondigitalarchaeologymethodsandtools,resourcesandscholarly literature,collaborationandmentoringbyexperts, and application of new knowledge in planning and implementing their own researchprojects. They recommend broader dissemination and expansion of TNA actions, a broadermethodologicalcurriculumbeyondinstrumentaltasks,morehands-onactivities,andcreationofanonline community of interest among participants.Evaluation of the Athens summer schoolsdemonstrates that they canbeeffectivemechanismsnot just for the instrumental useof existingtools and services, but also to reflectmethodologically, anddevelop appropriatenewapproachesand tools able to support the effective capture, curation, use and re-use of digital archaeologicaldatasets for archaeological inquiry, knowledge translation and professional management ofarchaeologicalresources,forthebenefitofresearch,educationandpublicuse.

Page 5: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

ARIADNED8.1(Public/Restricted)

5

1 IntroductionandObjectives

This document presents transnational access activities organised by the Digital Curation Unit,ATHENA R.C. (DCU) in 2015 and 2016, underWP8 of the project (ARIADNE Description ofWork(Versiondate:05-04-2014),p.31).Theseactivitiesbelongtoabroaderrangeofsuchactivities,inthecontext of the ARIADNE project, offering services and opportunities to archaeologists to enableaccesstotheresearchinfrastructure,includingonlineservices,trainingworkshops,accessvisitsandsummerschools. In this context,DCUorganized twosummerschools, in thesummerof2015and2016respectively,astransnationalaccessactivities:asummerschoolon“Emergingdigitalpracticesinarchaeologicalresearch”between29June-3July2015,andasummerschoolon“Digitalcurationofarchaeologicalknowledge”between13-17June2016.ParticipantswereinvitedtostayaweekinAthensto interactwiththe localresearchteamand infrastructuresattheDCU, introducerelevantarchaeologicalresearchandinformationmanagementandcurationchallenges,assessapproachestoaccessing integrateddatasetsprovidedby theproject for thebenefitof theirwork,and reflectonadvancedtopicsofestablishing,curatingandre-usingdigitalarchaeologicaldatasetsforresearch.ThestructureofbothTNAactivitieswastwofold:theyconsisteda)ofatrainingschool(threedays),mainlydrivenbychallengesintroducedbytheresearchersandbasedonacombinationofseminarsandhands-onworkshops,andb)anexpertforum(twodays),inwhichTNAparticipantswereinvitedtointeractwithexpertsondigitalarchaeologicalmethods,datasetsandcuration.Duringthetrainingschool,participantswereasked toshareanddiscuss their researchprojectsand informationworkchallenges to a resident team of DCU experts and an international faculty. The Expert Forumgatheredanadditionalnumberofexpertresearchers,bothwithintheARIADNEprojectandoutside,whichincludedmoderatedsessionsonspecificthematicareasandchallenges,aswellasstructuredgroupactivitiesfortheelicitationofcriteria,conceptualisationsandapproachestothecurrentandfuture use of digital research infrastructures to support research, preservation and reuse ofarchaeologicaldatasets.Accessofnewresearchersundertheprojectvisitingschemeenabledthemtoavailthemselvesoftheresourcesofthemuchwiderinfrastructurecreatedbytheproject–thusincreasingthepotentialimpactontheirresearchactivitiesinanexponentialway.Theproject’sUserSelectionPanel(organizedinWP5)metperiodicallytoselecteligibleproposalsforaccess and if necessary ranking them. Proposals used a simplified form illustrating the activityproposed,therationaleofthevisitandtheobjectivesoftheresearch.ThePanelavailedthemselvesof the support of independent experts asked to review proposals anonymously according to fairevaluationcriteriapublishedinthecallforparticipation.

Page 6: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

ARIADNED8.1(Public/Restricted)

6

2 ARIADNESummerSchools

2.1Year1(June29-July3,2015):Emergingdigitalpracticesinarchaeologicalresearch

The first summer schoolwasorganisedbyDCUbetween29 Juneand3 July2015,asanARIADNETransnational Networking Action, on the topic of “Emerging digital practices in archaeologicalresearch”. This thematic area included discussions on unlocking the possibilities for the effectivediscovery, integration, enrichment and reuse of archaeological data and resources, afforded bydigital tools and services such as the ARIADNE registry of archaeological datasets, controlledvocabulariesandmetadataschemas,andthroughmethodologicalknowledgeondigitalcurationandsemantic modeling of archaeological data. It also drew from the international experience ofparticipantson issuesasdiverseas thecapture, representationandreuseof fielddata, thedigitalcuration of archaeological information, the application of virtual archaeology, and the impact ofopen and community archaeology practices, as well as global, networked and cloud informationinfrastructures,ontheformationofthedigitalarchaeologicalrecord.

The main objective of this summer school was to enable researchers and professionals inarchaeology to engage with cutting edge and emerging digital practices within archaeologicalresearch,rangingfromnewmethodstocapture,organiseandcuratearchaeologicalresourcesanddata to new approaches of archaeological interpretation and dissemination, mediated by digitalinfrastructures.Thus,theformatfocusedonadetailedelaborationofasmallnumberofscenariosordigitally-enabledarchaeologicalresearchthatmakeuseofemergingdigitalinfrastructures,toolsandservices, put in the context of select methodological sources on digital archaeology, bringingtogether the research experiences of participants, and leveraging theARIADNE registry andotherinformation systems,aswell as semanticandontological approaches. It combined formal talksbyinvited speakers with structured discussion and breakout group activities. More particularly, theschool started with a foundations module introducing the core themes (‘Curating archaeologicalknowledge digitally: frompractice tomethod’),moved on to half-daymodules on selected topics(Semantic Modeling, LiDAR and Geophysical field data, Registries and Repository services, GIS,VirtualArchaeology,DigitalCuration)andconcludedwitha11/2dayExpertForumon‘Thefutureofdigital archaeological practice 2020-2025’. Among the invited speakers and participants weremembers of the ARIADNE Special Interest Group on archaeological digital research practices andmethods, collectively possessing significant expertise on digital archaeology, as well as visitingresearchersconductingarchaeologicalfieldworkinGreece.

2.1.1Participants

SixresearcherswereawardedascholarshipandwereselectedtoparticipateinthisTNANetworkingActivity,fromvariousinstitutionsanddifferentcareerstatus.Namely,thesescholarswere:

Page 7: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

ARIADNED8.1(Public/Restricted)

7

NameandSurname Nationality Affiliation Position

ErikaCappelletto Italian InstituteofClassicalArchaeology,HeidelbergUniversity

PostdoctoralResearcher

MartinDuffy Irish SchoolofArchaeology,UniversityCollegeDublin

PhDStudent

GiovanniFuso Italian DepartmentofArchaeology,UniversityofSalento

GraduateStudent

IstoHuvila Finnish DepartmentofArchival,LibraryandMuseumStudies,AboAkademiUniversity

AssistantProfessor

LauraStelson German InstituteofArchaeologyandCulturalAnthropology,UniversityofBonn

PhDStudent

IngridaVosyliute Lithuanian FacultyofCommunication,VilniusUniversity

PhDStudent

Reimbursementswereallowedforamaximumof€1000perparticipant.

Eliza Papaki (DCU) acted as local reference coordinator for organisational aspects, from thecollectionofstudentdocumentationforreimbursementstothelogisticalsupporton-site.

Page 8: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

11

2.1.2Programme

Theprogramofthe2015transnationalaccessactivityispresentedbelow.

SummerSchoolon“Emergingdigitalpracticesinarchaeologicalresearch”

Athens,June29–July3,2015

MondayJune29

9:30–10:00 Welcomeandintroductions

10:00–13:00 Curatingarchaeologicalknowledgedigitally:frompracticetomethod

14:00–17:00 Semanticmodellingoflegacyarchaeologicaldata

TuesdayJune30

9:00–12:00 WhattodowithLIDARandgeophysicalfielddata?Acasestudy

13:00–16:00 Discovering archaeological datasets and resources through registries andrepositoryservices

WednesdayJuly1

9:00–12:00 Humanizing GIS: new approaches to spatial data representation andinterpretationinarchaeology

13:00–16:00 DigitalarchaeologicalpracticeandVirtualArchaeology:puttingthingsincontext

16:00–17:00 Archaeology,informationanddigitalcuration

ThursdayJuly2

9:00–10:30 Introduction

11:00–12:45 Virtualarchaeologyand3D/immersivetechnologies

13:45–15:30 Thedigitalfutureofarchaeologicalfieldrecording

16:00–17:30 Digitalresearchinfrastructuresandarchaeology:presentvalue,futurepromise

FridayJuly3

9:00–10:45 Curatinglegacyarchaeologicaldata,collectionsandknowledge

11:15–13:00 Open,communityandparticipatorydigitalarchaeology

14:00–16:45 Opendiscussion:digitalarchaeology2020-2025

16:45–17:00 Finalremarks

Page 9: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

ARIADNED8.1(Public/Restricted)

9

2.2Year2(June13–17,2016):Digitalcurationofarchaeologicalknowledge

Followingthesuccessful launchandevaluationofthe2015ARIADNEsummerschoolon“Emerging

digital approaches in archaeological research”, the DCU hosted another summer school in 2016,

focusing this time on the “Digital curation of archaeological knowledge”, as an ARIADNE

TransnationalAccess(TNA)activity.Thissummerschool,whichtookplacebetween13and17June,

was also co-organised by the Faculty of Information (iSchool), University of Toronto and the

Departmentof Informatics,AthensUniversityofEconomicsandBusiness. Itdrewprimarilyon the

researchexperienceandinterestsofparticipantsonissuesasdiverseasdatamodelingandreuseof

pre-existing archaeological and historical evidence; its integration with scholarly and local

knowledge, its applicability for the construction of reliable digitalmodels and scientific data, the

impact of open and community archaeology practices, aswell as of global, networked and cloud

informationinfrastructures,ontheformationofthedigitalarchaeologicalrecord.

The main objective of the summer school was to enable researchers and professionals in the

knowledge domains of archaeology, information and archival science, museums and cultural

heritagemanagement toengagewith currentapproaches to thedigital curationof archaeological

knowledge, ranging frommethodstorepresent,contextualiseandcuratearchaeological resources

anddata,tonewapproachestoarchaeologicalinterpretationanddissemination,mediatedbydigital

infrastructures.Theformatofthesummerschoolincludedbothformallectureswiththeelaboration

of individual case studies based on participant projects, as well as structured discussion and

breakout group activities. Similar to the 2015 Summer School, it consisted of two modules: a

workshop on “Digital approaches to archaeological knowledge curation” and an Expert Forumon

‘The future of archaeological knowledge curation 2021-2026’. The firstmodulewas composed by

twotracks:half-daymodulesonselectedtopics, intandemwiththeelaborationandmentoringof

individualprojectsofeachparticipant inafternoonpracticalsessions.Thesecondmodule involved

participationoftheARIADNESpecialInterestGrouponArchaeologicalDigitalResearchPracticesand

Methods, as well as additional experts on the digital curation of pre-existing archaeological

resourcesandknowledge.

Page 10: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

ARIADNED8.1(Public/Restricted)

10

2.2.1Participants

Sevenresearcherswereawardedascholarshipandselected toparticipate in thisTNANetworkingActivity,fromvariousinstitutionsanddifferentcareerstatus.Namely,thesescholarswere:

NameandSurname Nationality Affiliation Position

IleniaGalluccio Italian VASTLAB,PINs.c.r.l.EducationalandScientificServicesfortheUniversityofFlorence

JuniorResearcher

Prof.RimvydasLaužikas

Lithuanian FacultyofCommunication,VilniusUniversity

AssistantProfessor

DrFedericoNurra Italian INRAP–TheFrenchNationalInstituteforPreventiveArchaeologicalResearch

Researcher

DrLorna-JaneRichardson

British DepartmentofSociology,UmeåUniversity

PostdoctoralResearcher

Prof.VladimirStissi Italian DepartmentofArchaeology,UniversityofAmsterdam

AssociateProfessor

DrAmaraThornton American InstituteofArchaeology,UniversityCollegeLondon

PostdoctoralResearcher

PriscillaUlguim Brazilian TeessideUniversity PhDStudent

Reimbursementswereallowedforamaximumof€1000perparticipant.

Nephelie Chatzidiakou (DCU) acted as local coordinator for organisational aspects, from thecollectionofstudentdocumentationforreimbursementstothelogisticalsupporton-site.

Page 11: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

ARIADNED8.1(Public/Restricted)

11

2.2.2Programme

Theprogramofthe2016transnationalaccessactivityispresentedbelow.

SummerSchoolon“Digitalcurationofarchaeologicalknowledge”

Athens,June13–17,2016

MondayJune13

9:00–9:30 Welcomeandintroductions

9:30–11:00 Curatingarchaeologicalknowledgedigitally:frompracticetomethod

11:30–13:00 Managing legacy archaeological data and resources through registries andrepositoryservices

14:30–17:30 Case studies: challenges and goals for archaeological research resourcemanagementandcuration

TuesdayJune14

9:30–13:00 Case study sprint 1: working towards solutions for archaeological researchresourcemanagementandcuration

14:30–15:30 Metadataschemasandcontrolledvocabulariesforarchaeologicalinformation

16:00–18:00 Representingarchaeologicalknowledgesemantically

WednesdayJune15

9:30–13:00 Case study II: working towards solutions for archaeological research resourcemanagementandcuration

14:30–16:00 Archaeology,informationanddigitalcuration

16:30–18:00 Archaeologicallegaciespastandfuture

ThursdayJune16

9:00–12:00 Case study presentations: solution spaces and plans for archaeological digitalcuration

13:15–13:30 Envisioningthefutureofarchaeologicaldigitalcuration

13:30–14:30 Challengesandadvancesinknowledgerepresentationandunderstanding

14:30–15:30 Challengesandadvancesincommunicationandvisualization

16:00–17:00 Challengesandstrategiesforsustainabilityandopenness

17:00–18:00 Scenarios for digital archaeological infrastructure and research planning:introductionandteamformation

Page 12: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

ARIADNED8.1(Public/Restricted)

12

FridayJune17

9:00–11:00 ScenariobuildingsprintI:usingarchaeologicaldigitalcurationinfrastructuresin2021-2026

11:30–13:00 Scenariobuilding sprint II: usingarchaeologicaldigital curation infrastructuresin2021-2026

14:30–16:30 Archaeologicaldigitalcurationinfrastructuresin2021-2026:vision,affordancesandscenariosofuse

16:30–17:00 Finalremarks

Page 13: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

ARIADNED8.1(Public/Restricted)

13

3EvaluationandresultsThe participants of the two Summer Schools were asked to fill in the online “ResearchInfrastructures: User group questionnaire” (https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/RIsurveyUSERS)as well as the ARIADNE “TNA Summary - User Feedback Report” (http://www.ariadne-infrastructure.eu/Transnational-Access/User-feedback-report). Both questionnaires provided uswithinformationabouttheirprofessionalstatusandacademicbackground,theirprojectsaswellaswithevaluationreportsandcommentsabouttheservicesprovided.

Overall, 13 participants attended the two Summer Schools, six in 2015 and seven in 2016. Asexpected most participants are European nationals, while in the second Summer School non-European nationals also participated, namely from the USA and Brazil. Most of the EuropeannationalswerefromItalyandtherestfromvariousEuropeancountries(seeFig.1).

Figure1:Summerschoolparticipantsbycountry.

Mostparticipantscomefromacademia(includinguniversitiesandresearchcentres),whileonlytwowere attached to industry. Regarding employment status, eight participants are in professionalemployment(asprofessors,researchersorprojectmanagers)whilefivewerestudents(seeFig.2).

Page 14: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

ARIADNED8.1(Public/Restricted)

14

Figure2:Summerschoolparticipantaffiliationandprofessionalstatus.

Some of the projects and challenges presented by the participants in both Summer Schoolsconcerned the application of specific digitalmethods and techniques such as spatial analysis, 3Dmodels,GISanddigitalmaps.Ontheotherhand,mostoftheparticipants’researchprojectsraisedsignificantchallengesrelatedtothedigitallifecycleofarchaeologicaldata.Theseincludedissuesofdigitisation,databasedesign,socialcollaborationandparticipatoryuseofarchaeologicalresources,archaeological domain modeling and knowledge representation, metadata for archaeologicalmuseum collections, digital preservation anddata access, integration between archaeological andother(anthropological,historical)sources,etc.

Overall,theparticipantsstatedthatthroughparticipatingintheARIADNEtransnationalaccesstheyhad the opportunity to learn, network, collaborate and get help on their current projects. Morespecifically,thecommentsgatheredfromtheARIADNETNASummary-UserFeedbackReportspointouttoachievementsinthefollowingareas:

• Newlearningandunderstandingaboutdigitalarchaeology ingeneral,oron morespecificaspectssuchasdatabases,GIS,metadataetc.;

• Familiarisationwithnewresourcesandliterature;

• Networkingandcollaborationwithexperiencedresearchers;

• Implementationoftheinsightsgainedintoongoingprojects,and;

• Specificachievementsrelatedtotheparticipants’projects,aswellasfurtherelaborationoftheirprojectsthroughmentoringanddiscussionswithexperts.

As regards suggestions on potential improvements, participants identified the followingrecommendations:

• IntroductionofagreatervarietyoftopicsintheSummerSchoolprogramme

Page 15: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

ARIADNED8.1(Public/Restricted)

15

• StrengtheningoftheappliedskillsaspectoftheSchoolintheformofhands-onworkshops

• Morepublicitytoensurebroaderdisseminationoftheopportunitytoparticipate,includingearlieradvertisingoftheSummerSchoolanditsprogramme

• Creationofafollow-upmailinglistforparticipantstobeabletocommunicateaftertheendoftheSummerSchool

• IntroductionofmoreSchoolsduringtheyear,notonlyinthesummer

Page 16: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

ARIADNED8.1(Public/Restricted)

16

4ConclusionInconclusion,thetwoTNAeventscarriedoutbytheDigitalCurationUnit,ATHENAR.C.in2015and

2016 fulfilled their objectives, by engaging the attendees in important learning outcomes with

regard to emerging approaches in digital archaeology and the digital curation of archaeological

knowledge, leveragingthevalueofdigitalresearchinfrastructuresintegratingandprovidingaccess

to legacy archaeological datasets. Attendees were offered opportunities to engage with digital

methods and tools for archaeological data curation,GIS, registries and repository services, virtual

andparticipatoryarchaeology,digitalresearchinfrastructures,butwerealsogiventheopportunity

todevelopstudent-centredactivelearningbasedontheirownresearchprojectsandchallenges,in

the formofcasestudies.Attendancehasbeenstrong,and feedbackwasoverallbetweenpositive

andverypositive.

Interestingly,discussionsandcollaboration inbothSummerSchools focusedoncurrentchallenges

thatarchaeologyfacestodayas itstands intheborderlineofdigitalandlegacy(non-digital)assets

andpractices.Thefollowinglistofchallengesweredocumentedandanalysedinthecontextofthese

two TNA events. They summarise the discussions held, in the form of identifying challenges and

specificquestions,relatedtoemergentarchaeologicalknowledgecuration.

Challenge1:

Addressingthedemandsoflocalknowledgeandpublicinvolvementinarchaeologicalinterpretationanduse

Questions:

• Howcandigitalarchaeologicalresourcesbebettercuratedtoserveparticipatoryandopenarchaeology?

• Whatwillbetheroleofsocialmedia?

• Howcandigitalarchaeologicalinfrastructuresbetterservetheneedsofopenandparticipatoryarchaeology?

• Whatistheroleofnovelplatformsoflearning?

• Whattools,methodsandserviceswouldbeappropriatetosupportopenandparticipatoryarchaeology?

Page 17: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

ARIADNED8.1(Public/Restricted)

17

Challenge2:

Providingeffectivemechanismsforarchaeologicaleducationandtraininginthedigitalenvironment

Questions:

• Whatarethebestwaystoachievedigitalliteracy?Courses,manuals,workshops?

• Whatmightbetheroleofarchaeologicaldigitalresearchinfrastructuresandlearningplatformsinpromotingdigitalliteracy?

Challenge3:

Addressingemergingrequirementsforarchaeologicalpublication,peerreviewandscholarlycommunication

Questions:

• Howtobetteruseordesignsocialmediatoenhancecriticalengagement?

• Howtofacilitatetheshiftinsocialmediafromdataandinformationtoknowledgeandexperience?

• Willdifferentandspecializedkindsofsocialmediaemergeinthefuture?

• Howcanwebettersupportthesenovelconditionsofcollaboration?

Challenge4:

Howcandigitaltechnologiescontributetothecomplexitiesofarchaeologicaldataandknowledgerepresentationinthelightofnewquestions?

Questions:

• Howtobringthesetechnologiesintoarchaeologicalpracticewhilekeepingthefocusinourdiscipline?

• Howcanmetadatabecomeanintegralpartofthedocumentationprocess?

• Howcanwebetterusethesemodels?

• Howtofaceissuesofsustainability?

Challenge5:

Howcanweensurethedigitalpreservationandfuturescholarlyaccesstothearchaeologicalrecord?

Questions:

• Whataboutexploringtheroleofinfrastructuresaspartoflearningenvironments?

Challenge6:

Understandingemergingarchaeologicalpracticeinthedigitalenvironment

Page 18: ARIADNE- Quantity of access offered (3)

ARIADNED8.1(Public/Restricted)

18

Challenge7:

Ensuringthequalityandreliabilityofdigitalarchaeologicaldata

Questions:

• Whataboutparadata?Orientingmoretowardscoveringallcontextualattributedthataccompanydata.

• Ensuringquality,preservationandusabilityofthisdatainthefuture–curationofculturalheritageinformation

Challenge8:

Providingappropriatemethodsandtoolstoprocesslargescale,comparativearchaeologicaldata

Questions:

• Whatquestionscanbeaskedontopofthisdataandwhatinterpretiveandrepresentationstructureswillenablethiscommunitytotakeadvantageofbigdata?

The formulation of these broader dimensions of using and reusing digital archaeologicalinfrastructuresbyparticipants in the transnationalaccessactivitiesorganizedbyDCUpoints toanimportantneed:todevelop,inthefuture,effectivemechanismsnotjustfortheinstrumentaluseofexisting tools and services, but also to reflect methodologically, and develop appropriate newmechanisms and tools able to support the effective capture, curation, use and re-use of digitalarchaeologicaldatasetsforacademicarchaeologicalinquiry,knowledgetranslationandprofessionalmanagementofarchaeologicalresources,forthebenefitofresearch,educationandpublicuse.Asalesson learned, future transnational access activities connected with archaeological researchinfrastructureswillbewell-advisedtoexpandtheirpurviewtoaddressthesebroaderissues.