Arctic Fibre Progress Report to NCIS-WG Oct 31, 2012

download Arctic Fibre Progress Report to NCIS-WG Oct 31, 2012

of 13

Transcript of Arctic Fibre Progress Report to NCIS-WG Oct 31, 2012

  • 7/31/2019 Arctic Fibre Progress Report to NCIS-WG Oct 31, 2012

    1/13

    Progress Report to NCIS-WG

    October 30, 2012

  • 7/31/2019 Arctic Fibre Progress Report to NCIS-WG Oct 31, 2012

    2/13

    Minor Route Amendments > Major Impact

    2

  • 7/31/2019 Arctic Fibre Progress Report to NCIS-WG Oct 31, 2012

    3/13

    Backbone Route Changes Add Value

    Hudsons Bay East Shore route facilitates landings in Nunavik

    Hudsons Bay East Shore route facilitates eventual mesh ring with Kivalliq spur at

    Arviat

    Hudsons Bay East Shore route facilitates eventual fibre connection to Sanikiluaq at

    cost ~$8 million

    Hudsons Bay East Shore route extends Eeyou Network reach to Whapmagoostuui

    and Kuujjuarapik Second Canadian international gateway created from Montreal hub to Europe

    Revised routing reduces subsea network build by ~ 580 km - capex reduced

    Tokyo-New York City distance lowered by ~2,300 km

    Arctic Fibre latency < 137 milliseconds (RTD) fastest route between Tokyo & NYC

    Greater international traffic creates domestic economies of scale

    3

  • 7/31/2019 Arctic Fibre Progress Report to NCIS-WG Oct 31, 2012

    4/13

    Over the Top Telecommunications

    Estimated Arctic Fibre Latency (Milliseconds-RTD)@100G

    Boston NYC Montreal Toronto Chicago London Frankfurt

    Shanghai 178 170 162 171 179 192 201

    Seoul 163 155 147 154 164 172 181

    Tokyo 145 137 129 136 146 159 168

    Hong Kong 195 187 179 186 197 209 218

    Least Latent Alternative Carrier (Advertised and Inservice)

    Boston NYC Montreal Toronto Chicago London Frankfurt

    4

    Shanghai 181 174 200 171 161 212 199Seoul 166 159 185 156 146 202 200

    Tokyo 148 141 167 138 128 189 187

    Hong Kong 197 192 197 188 176 215 224

    Arctic Fibre Advantage (Disadvantage)

    Boston NYC Montreal Toronto Chicago London FrankfurtShanghai 3 4 38 0 -18 20 -2

    Seoul 3 4 38 2 -18 30 19

    Tokyo 3 4 38 2 -18 30 19

    Hong Kong 2 5 18 2 -21 6 6

  • 7/31/2019 Arctic Fibre Progress Report to NCIS-WG Oct 31, 2012

    5/13

    Progress Regulatory and Permitting

    Formal application for landing licence filed with Industry Canada on October 2, 2012

    Application amended this week to enable Hudsons Bay landing alternatives near Chisasibi

    and Moosonee Permit Coordination underway with CanNor, Nunavut Impact Review Board, Industry Canada

    WFN Strategies completed Desk Top Study on original route Tokyo-London in July and

    amendments this week ice issues manageable

    Landing permit process in Japan and United Kingdom underway

    5

  • 7/31/2019 Arctic Fibre Progress Report to NCIS-WG Oct 31, 2012

    6/13

    Progress Technical Network Backbone

    Decision made to utilize 100G technology over four fibre pairs = 32 Terabits system capacity

    Formal request for turnkey proposal issued August 2012 to TE Subcom and Alcatel/Lucent

    Revised RFP amendments will delay submissions until end of November

    Discussions underway with various entities on terrestrial fibre builds, swaps and dark fibre

    leases in Ontario and Quebec

    Marine surveys will commence in 2013Q2 and continue through October 2013

    erres r a c v wor s o e un er a en n pr or o mar ne opera ons n

    Nearshore landing alternatives identified in DTS

    Partnering with existing telcos in most Arctic communities for collocation

    Cambridge Bay CLS alternatives being evaluated

    Arctic Fibre will sponsor Inuktitut-language internet portal in Iqaluit

    RFS date of November 2014

    6

  • 7/31/2019 Arctic Fibre Progress Report to NCIS-WG Oct 31, 2012

    7/13

    Technical Microwave Extensions

    Arctic Fibre collaborated with WireIE to engineer microwave extensions from backbone CLS

    Each community will receive minimum 50 Mbps with low-cost upgrades available to 1Gbps

    Hybrid fibre optic microwave network reaches ~96.5% of Nunavut population at capital costof $9 million (inc. power) over and above Nunavut fibre spur cost of $111 million.

    Communities served by microwave:

    Kimmurut, Baker Lake, Whale Cove, Kugarruk, Repulse Bay, Arctic Bay

    es ua sa e e- epen en commun es:

    Resolute Bay, Grise Fiord, Sanikiluaq (combined population 1,233)

    Sanikiluaq (population 850) could be fibred off Hudsons Bay backbone for ~$8 million

    Fibre-microwave outlay of $128 million leaves only 343 Nunavut residents (1%) on satellite

    Virtually unlimited (100Gbps) fibre capacity inc. 1 Gbps microwave links for $128 million

    Satellite with limited 3Gbps capacity costs $300 million and has shorter lifespan

    7

  • 7/31/2019 Arctic Fibre Progress Report to NCIS-WG Oct 31, 2012

    8/13

    Progress - Marketing

    Domestic Open Season Capacity Nomination Process concluded successfully with seven

    entities participating

    Three other entities still in negotiations based upon specific technical requirements Tuktoyaktuk spur dropped due to lack of demand > potential terrestrial fibre

    Assurances received from Nunavut Government on migration to fibre as satellite contracts

    expire in 2015-16 working toward MOU

    secondary spurs and microwave extensions based upon revised routing. Immediate requirement for Federal/provincial/territorial upfront commitment by year end

    on 11 backbone underwater branching units for secondary spurs retroactive installation

    impossible

    Immediate requirement for other NCIS-WG connection requirements to be identified

    Canadian carriers enthusiastic about prospect of second network connection to Europe American carriers and HFTNs enthusiastic about Asia-NYC low latency improvement

    International carrier negotiations concluding at PTC in January 2013

    8

  • 7/31/2019 Arctic Fibre Progress Report to NCIS-WG Oct 31, 2012

    9/13

    Progress - Financial

    Financial models being revised to reflect route changes > increased demand > lower costs

    Strong investor interest from financial institutions and foreign carriers ownership likely a

    hybrid carrier consortium + institutional investor model

    9

  • 7/31/2019 Arctic Fibre Progress Report to NCIS-WG Oct 31, 2012

    10/13

    Progress Corporate Resources

    Arctic Fibre has recently hired North American carrier sales staff

    Potential marketing partnership with major carrier collocation entity

    Arctic Fibre has engaged former Iqaluit Mayor Madeleine Redfern to assist with Nunavutpermitting issues

    Search for in-house legal counsel underway

    Bennett Jones acts as regulatory counsel in Ottawa

    10

  • 7/31/2019 Arctic Fibre Progress Report to NCIS-WG Oct 31, 2012

    11/13

    Required Steps NCIS-WG

    1. Ensure Shared Services Canada is fully aware of your Departments short-term and longer-

    term bandwidth requirements having taken price-elasticity into effect

    2. Ensure Shared Services Canada and Arctic Fibre are aware of your High Arctic requirementswhich might require additional underwater branching units

    3. Ensure Shared Services Canada and Arctic Fibre are aware of subsea sensor requirements/

    locations on an immediate basis for engineering purposes

    11

  • 7/31/2019 Arctic Fibre Progress Report to NCIS-WG Oct 31, 2012

    12/13

    Cable Ships in the Arctic

    12

  • 7/31/2019 Arctic Fibre Progress Report to NCIS-WG Oct 31, 2012

    13/13