ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

17
ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

Transcript of ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

Page 1: ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

ARC Board Working SessionMay 21, 2015

Understanding the Transportation Funding

Act (HB 170)

Page 2: ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

What the Transportation Funding Act Achieves…

• Diversifies state transportation funding streams

• Doubling of state transportation funding

• Provision for county-level “transportation districts”

Page 3: ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

State Transportation Funding Sources

Excise Tax26 cents/gallon gasoline29 cents/gallon diesel

$5 per nightHotel / MotelRoom Nightly Fee

Alternative Vehicle Annual Fee

$300 commercial$200 non-commercial

Heavy Vehicle Annual Impact Fee

$50 - 15,500 to 26,000 lbs.$100 - Greater than 26,001 lbs.

Page 4: ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

$1.9 Billion Generated in 2017

Revenues $1,667,000,000 $225,000,000

Excise Tax Hotel/Motel Nightly Fee Heavy Vehicle FeeAlt Veh Annual Fee

Page 5: ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

Significant Amount of Funding Generated in ARC 10 County Region

(examples)

43% of Excise Tax

59% of Hotel / Motel

Room Nightly Fee

Page 6: ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

LMIG will Increase as State Funding Grows

Page 7: ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

Facts on Special Transportation Districts

• 159 special districts created

• 1% maximum rate (fractional rates allowed)

• 5 year maximum period of time

• At least 30 percent of the estimated revenue allocated to projects in the state-wide strategic transportation plan

Page 8: ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

Potential Funds Generated for Special Transportation Districts in 10 County

Region

Page 9: ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

Thought Exercise… Potential Options for Cross Regional Cooperation?

Page 10: ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

Clifton Corridor (Fulton-DeKalb)

• Transit expansion betweenLindbergh and Avondale Station

• Total Cost: $1.2 billion

• Funds Generated in Counties:

Page 11: ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

I-285 Transit (DeKalb-Fulton-Cobb)

• Transit expansion betweenDoraville and Cumberland

• Total Cost: $1.5 billion

• Funds Generated in Counties:

Page 12: ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

SR 85 Corridor (Fayette-Clayton)

• Corridor improvements between SR 92 and I-75

• Total Cost: $70 million

• Funds Generated in Counties:

Page 13: ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

SR 140 Corridor (Cherokee-Fulton)

• Corridor improvements between Roswell and Canton

• Total Cost: $275 million

• Funds Generated in Counties:

Page 14: ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

SR 6 Corridor (Cobb-Douglas-Fulton)

• Corridor improvements betweenCobb and Airport

• Total Cost: $260 million

• Funds Generated in Counties:

Page 15: ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

SR 120 Corridor (Gwinnett-Fulton)

• Corridor improvements betweenJohns Creek and Duluth

• Total Cost: $120 million

• Funds Generated in Counties:

Page 16: ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

Example Projects Cherokee Clayton Cobb DeKalb Douglas Fayette Fulton Gwinnett

Clifton Corridor $900,000,000 $300,000,000

I-285 Transit $400,000,000 $700,000,000 $400,000,000

SR 85 Corridor $60,000,000 $10,000,000

SR 140 Corridor $190,000,000 $85,000,000

SR 6 Corridor $100,000,000 $100,000,000 $60,000,000

SR 120 Corridor $85,000,000 $35,000,000

Total Example Project Costs $190,000,000 $60,000,000 $500,000,000 $1,600,000,000 $100,000,000 $10,000,000 $930,000,000 $35,000,000

Total Funding Generated $156,000,000 $225,000,000 $655,000,000 $529,000,000 $113,000,000 $100,000,000 $1,204,000,000 $690,000,000

Summary of Example Costs by Jurisdiction

Page 17: ARC Board Working Session May 21, 2015 Understanding the Transportation Funding Act (HB 170)

Questions?

• What are your thoughts on potential strategies that could succeed as a special transportation district project?

• What questions need to be answered to determine if a special transportation district is appropriate for your community?