ARBITRAGE OPPORTUNITIES MALAYSIA FUTURES MARKET … Opportunities and Pricing... · Corporate...
Transcript of ARBITRAGE OPPORTUNITIES MALAYSIA FUTURES MARKET … Opportunities and Pricing... · Corporate...
ARBITRAGE OPPORTUNITIES AND PRICING EFFICIENCY IN MALAYSIA FUTURES MARKET - KUALA LUMPUR STOCK
EXCHANGE COMPOSITE INDEX FUTURES (FKLI)
bull -~ ~ ~ ~bullr ~ - 1Jason Jasmy Khong
Corporate Master in Business Administration
2013
Pusat 1lthidn at lbklumat Akadtmik UNIVERSm ~YSIA SARAWAK
PKHIDMAT MAKLUMAT AKADEMIK
1IIIIIIIIIiiiiilllllllili 1000246861
ARBITRAGE OPPORTUNITIES AND PRICING EFFICIENCY IN MALAYSIA FUTURES MARKET - KUALA LUMPUR STOCK EXCHANGE COMPOSITE
INDEX FUTURES (FKLI)
JASON JASMY KHONG
This project is submitted in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree of Corporate Master in Business Administration
t middot middot ~middotmiddot vr~bullbull
Faculty of Economics and Business UNlVERSITI MALAYSlASARAWAK
2013
J I II i I
i-f bull
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY
The work describe in this project entitled
ARBITRAGE OPPORTUNITIES AND PRICING EFFICIENCY IN MALAYSIA FUTURES MARKET - KUALA LUMPUR STOCK EXCHANGE COMPOSITE middot
INDEX FUTURES (FKLI)
is to the best of the authors knowledge that ofthe author except
where due reference is made
1- s- 201
Date submitted Jason Jasmy Khong 11031926
1 10 bull III ~
Imiddot
I
ABSTRACT
ARBITRAGE OPPORTUNITIES AND PRICING EFFICIENCY IN MALAYSIA FUTURES MARKET - KUALA LUMPUR STOCK EXCHANGE COMPOSITE
INDEX FUTURES (FKLI)
By
Jason Jasmy Khong
(A futures contract is defined as the agreement between two parties which are the seller
and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sell a certain product The contract states all the
details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity price and the delivery of the product
on a predetennined date Both parties have the responsibilities and obligations to carry out
the agreed transaction at the maturity date A futures contract is viewed as a hedging tool
by the market players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is
adverse price change in the market With the existence of stock indices futures contract
investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without changing their
portfolio compositi0o In order to be a good hedging tool hedging effectiveness is one the
important criteria to measure the performance of the futures contract It implies the
accuracy of the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Therefore pricing
of the futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future con~t Price ampmvergence~od~lbull indicates that price
discrepancies between the cash market and futur~s market should not last long An - ~
effective arbitrage activity is vital to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line
Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices do not deviate substantially from its
i IV bull middoti t-
~
fair price for a long period of time Therefore if arbitrage is not effective futures market
will not be a good hedging tool for the investor The general objective of this study is to
identify the arbitrage opportunities and pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Colnposite Index Futures (FKLI) The results show there are constant
happenings of negative basis price deviations in the FKLI contracts under the simple cost
of carry model This confinns that there are man opportunities available for traders to
undertake arbitrage activities The results also suggest that the pricing mechanism is
sensitive to the price volatility in the equity market Moreover there are still some
violations of the arbitrage free boundary remained in observation after testing under
different level of transaction costs which imply that the investor who is able to lower their
transaction costs will have greater exploitation to the arbitrage opportunities than others
shy
bull t
I ~
I V f
ABSTRAK
PELUANG ARBITRAJ DAN KECEKAPAN HARGA DI PASARAN KONTRAK NIAGA HADAPAN DI MALAYSIA - KONTRAK NIAGA HADAPAN INDEKS
SAHAM KUALA LUMPUR (FKLI) Oleh
Jason Jasmy Khong
Kontrak niaga hadapan adalah peIjanjian antara penjual dan pembeli sesuatu komoditi yang
menetapkan harga kuantiti dan kualiti komoditi tersebut dan masa bila urus niaga ini akan
berlaku Kontrak ini membawa kewajipan kepada kedua-dua pihak untuk menunaikan
syarat-syarat yang ditetapkan Salah satu kelebihan kontrak niaga hadapan adalah untuk
membekalkan peserta pasaran dengan alat perlindungan nilai yang dapat mengimbangi
risiko mereka dalam pasaran tunai Pengenalan kontrak niaga hadapan indeks saham
menyediakan altematif kepada pelabur untuk mengawal risiko pasaran dalam portfolio
mereka tanpa mengubah komposisi saham di dalam portfolio Keberkesanan lindung nitai
kontrak niaga hadapan bergantung kepada setakat mana kontrak itu dapat mencerminkan
pasaran asasnya dengan tepat Oleh sehab itu mekanisme harga kontrak niaga hadapan
yang cekap adalah penting untuk memastikan salah harga antara pasaran tunai dan pasaran
niaga hadapan adalah minimum Dengan itu akitiviti arbitraj memainkan peranan yang
penting untuk memastikan kedua-dua harga di pasaran tunai dan pasaran niaga hadapan I t ~ _ bullbull~ -~~
adalah sejajar Perdagangan arbitraj yang aktif dapat mem~t~1iarga kontralc-kontrak
niaga adalah betul dan adil supaya objektif-kecekapan harga akan dipenuhi Kajian ini akan
memberi tumpuan ke atas pemeriksaan perbezaan antara harga sebenar kontrak niaga
hadapan indeks saham Kuala Lumpur (FKLI)middot di pasaran deng~ harga yang sepatutnyavi I I f
tbullbull ~
apabila dinilai dengan menggunakan kaedah cost of carry Kajian ini juga menguji
kewujudan peluang arbitraj selepas mengambil pertimbangan tentang kos transaksi Di
samping itu kertas ini juga cuba untuk menentukan sarna ada kecekapan harga di pasaran niaga hadapln indeks saham di Malaysia telah meningkat sepanjang masa Keputusan
daripada kajian tersebut menunjukkan bahawa kejadian salah harga antara harga sebenar
dengan harga teori berlaku dengan kerap dan be~erusan Selepas mengambil pertimbangan
tentang kos urusniaga beberapa kejadian salah harga yang melebihi batasan tanpa arbitrage
~ masih dapat diperhatikan lni menunjukkan bahawa peluang arbitraj masih wujud untuk
pedagang yang menghadapi kos transaksi yang lebih rendah Dari segi kecekapan harga
pasaran niaga hadapan memperolehi prestasi yang lebih baik selepas krisis subprime 2008
ketika ekonomi sedang memasuki peringkat pemulihan
-shy middot - t ~middotmiddot middot middot ~middot middot r~=-~ bull-~
bull t
t
I bullbull Vll I (I bull tmiddot
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all I would like to express my deepest and most sincere gratitude to my project paper ~pervisor of the Faculty Economics and Business Assoc Prof Venus Liew
Khim Sen for continuously supporting me throughout the completion of project paper
period His patience and enthusiasm always motivafes me to write a good project paper In
addition his willingness to share his wide knowledge allows me to improve and gain more
knowledge each time we meet Without his guidance I would not able to complete my
project paper on time
Next I would like to thank my parents and family for giving me the encouragement
and financial support to pursue MBA With their support I am able to persevere and
eventually finish my project paper and coursework Finally I would like to thank all my
course mates for always being there and helping me whenever I faced with any obstacles or
difficulties in my study
shy
viii t I II
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARAWAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY III
ABSTRACT IV
ABSTRAK VI
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Vlll
LIST OF TABLES Xl
LIST OF FIGURES Xll
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Xlll
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction 1
12 Background of Study 6
13 Problem Statement 10
14 Research Question 11
15 Research Objectives 11
16 Significance of Study 12
17 Organization of Study 13
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
21 Introduction 14
22 The Stock Index Futures Pricing Model in a Perfect Market (No 16
Transaction Cost)
23 The Cost of Carry Model in an Imperfect Market bull - 21
231 Difficulty ofTrad~g th~ u~d~rrYimiddot~glnaex~ask~ ~i 4middot 22 bull
232 Regulatory Restrictions and Barriers -shy 24
233 Transaction Costs 28
234 Stochastic Interest Rate 33
235 Tax and Tax Timing Option 33
ix
i tt bull (0 II I
236 Dividend Misspecification 34
24 Market Efficiency and Relationship between Stock Futures Index 35
and Cash Price Index
CHAPTER ~ RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
31 Introduction 38
32 Data 38
33 Methodology 39
33 1 Arbitrage Opportunities under Cost of Carry Model 39
332 Constructing the Arbitrage-Free Boundary 42
333 Mispricing of FKLI Futures Contract in Malaysia Futures 45
Market
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
41 Arbitrage Opportunities Under Simple Cost of Carry Model 46
42 Arbitrage Opportunities after Transaction Costs 53
43 Pricing Efficiency in Malaysia Stocks Index Futures (FKLI) Market 56
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION
51 Introduction 61
52 Major Findings of Study 62
53 Implication and Recommendation of Study 63
REFERENCES 64
t~ i
_ ~
I X bull i i bull t shy
List of Tables Page
Table 11 Specifications of FKLI futures contract 8
Table 31 bommissions on Trading of Stocks and Futures Contracts 43
43
Table 41 Average monthly mispricing of the FKLI futures contracts 52
Table 42 Arbitrage Opportunities under Differe~t Level of Transaction 55
Costs
Table 43 Standard error between the actual closing price and 58
theoretical price
Table 44 Summary of regression analysis between actual and 60
theoretical price
Table 32 Total Transaction Costs Involved in Index Arbitrage
bull I
xi I I
List of Figures Page
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures 9
Contract Figure 41 Plots of Futures Premium from Jan 2001 to Dec 2010 50
Figure 42 Distribution of the FKLI contracts premium 51
Figure 43 Plots of standard error between the ackl futures price and 58
theoretical price
xii I i ~ bull t jj
I
List of Abbreviations
8MD Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad
FBMKLCI FTSE Bursa Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
FKLI FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI Futures
KLCI Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
KLOFFE Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financi~ Futures Exchange
MDEX Malaysian Derivatives Exchange Berhad
SampPSOO Standard and Poors 500 Index ~
SPDR Standard and Poors Depository Receipt
ETF Exchange Traded Fund
1 bull
xiii t J
~
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction
The finan~ial world has witnessed more and more attention in the area of
derivative financial instruments in the preceding years Derivatives have gained
reputation and popularity to become the proven form ~frisk management tools Amidst
the few derivatives instruments futures are among the measures that have been widely
used by corporations as a way of protection against unpredictable outcomes of the
markets Futures markets are derivatives markets that exist due to the existence of cash
market The futures markets plays a key role in managing risks related to the
adjustment in price volatility of some assets as well as to provide the opportunities for
speculators (Normas Izani Rasidah amp Saiful 2012)
Futures market was originated from commodities trading especially for
agricultural products A futures contract is defmed as the agreement between two
parties which are the seller and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sen a certain
product The contract states all the details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity
price and the delivery of the product on a predetermined date Both parties have the
responsibilities and obligations to carry outthe ~lt~~~1saction at the maturity date - middot ~ r- ~ t f gtlO p
Nowadays futures market is more popular and widely used in financial sector
- _
Various types of equity and financial derivatives are offered by the futures market in
order to facilitate the trading These derivative products have a wide coverage which
includes currency interbank offer rate government securities ~ock indices and etc ~ t ) -1
1
The futures market is mainly made up by 3 types of market players who are known as
hedgers speculators and arbitrageurs
Hedger is usually a real investor who has taken a position in cash market He uses
futures as insuQince to hedge his portfolio risk in order to minimize his loss if
something happen out of his expectation Hedging refers to a position established in
one market in an attempt to offset exposure to pri(4e fluctuations in the opposite
position in another market with the goal of minimizing ones exposure to unwanted
risk For example fund managers are perpetually with stocks in hand therefore their
risk exposure to the market would be enhanced in declining markets A fund manager
expects that in two months time the share prices will appreciate However he is
worried that unforeseen events may cause prices to decline prior to the time he would
sell his stocks He chooses to trade on BMD and hedges his position by selling the
forward FKLI contract In doing so he haS effectively agreed to lock-in his future
selling price today for a contract that will expire in two months time
Besides hedging FKLI is also used for arbitraging by arbitrageurs When
derivatives are trading above and below their theoretical fair value it is possible to
undertake arbitrage strategies by buying or selling the derivatives and simultaneously
selling or purchasing the underlying st~ks For example the fund manager realizes t- fi~ bull r-~ bull
bull If ~ i 1
that the correlation prices of the cash market and the FKLI market has deviated from bull
If
its usual spreads and that the FKLI is trading at a premium to the cash market
Arbitrage can take place by selling FKLI and buying the underlying shares in the
equity market The position will be liquidated later once the spread o(the prices it tmiddot
~
2
between both markets return to it fair value
However trading of futures contracts by speculators are just like a gambling
activity They are not planning to taking delivery but merely expecting to earn profit
from the differqtce of prices by buying the contract with lower price and selling it with
higher price (Chance amp Brooks 2010) They will observe the trading patterns and post
data on reactions to market announcements to make estimate on possible bullish or
bearish trends For example the fund manger expects a spike up in prices in
anticipation of an increase in buying activities by foreign funds based on the positive
economic data of the country It naturally will increase its exposure and may purchase
stocks and FKLJ simultaneously to maximize its buylong portfolio position
As mentioned earlier futures market is viewed as a hedging tool by the market
players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is adverse
price change in the market Prior to 198~ investors in stock market are having
difficulties in controlling their market risk With the existence of stock indices futures
contract investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without
changing their portfolio composition Due to the low transaction cost involved
investors favor to use stock index futures as a hedging tool This has been proven by
the drastic growth in the futures contrac~ tra9ing volume over the few decades (Gosh bull ~~ middot~i middot
1993)
In order to be a good hedging tool hedgi~g effectiveness is one the important
criteria to measure the perfonnance of the futures contract It implies the accuracy of
the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Ther~for~pricing of the ~ 1 -
3
futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future contract The futures contracts should be priced under an
efficient mechanism to minimize the possibility of mispricing According to Merrick
(1988) misprJcing of futures contract has 3 implications on hedging First when there
is mispricing on the contract hedging will not be riskless if the hedger does not hold
the contract until its maturity date Under the efficient pricing mechanism the return
on a future~ash hedge will purely depend on the relative movement of the futures
price versus its spot price However the existence of mispricing will include a
stochastic component into the consideration Second if there is a correlation between
mispricing and futures return the hedge ratios calculated may not fulfill the variance
minimization rule Third mispricing also has impact on the cost of hedging In general
if the futures contract is overpriced in the first place a short term long cash hedge
gains more than its fair return On the contrary the gain will be lesser than fair returns
if the contract is underpriced
Despite futures contracts and its underlying are traded in different markets the
price movements in two markets have to be in line As the futures contract approaching
its maturity date its price shall gradually converge to its underlying spot price
prevailing in cash market The diffetence be~een the spot price of the underlying ~ bull ~ r-~ bull
bull ~ middot ~ ~ bull ~ t
instrument and price of the futures contract is known as basis It is the net cost of
carrying the futures contract to the maturity date For financial futures the financing
cost for the margin requirement is the primary component of the basis and equity
based futures will have to factor in the dividends receivabl~ by pn 9~er of physical ~t bull I
4
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
Pusat 1lthidn at lbklumat Akadtmik UNIVERSm ~YSIA SARAWAK
PKHIDMAT MAKLUMAT AKADEMIK
1IIIIIIIIIiiiiilllllllili 1000246861
ARBITRAGE OPPORTUNITIES AND PRICING EFFICIENCY IN MALAYSIA FUTURES MARKET - KUALA LUMPUR STOCK EXCHANGE COMPOSITE
INDEX FUTURES (FKLI)
JASON JASMY KHONG
This project is submitted in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree of Corporate Master in Business Administration
t middot middot ~middotmiddot vr~bullbull
Faculty of Economics and Business UNlVERSITI MALAYSlASARAWAK
2013
J I II i I
i-f bull
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY
The work describe in this project entitled
ARBITRAGE OPPORTUNITIES AND PRICING EFFICIENCY IN MALAYSIA FUTURES MARKET - KUALA LUMPUR STOCK EXCHANGE COMPOSITE middot
INDEX FUTURES (FKLI)
is to the best of the authors knowledge that ofthe author except
where due reference is made
1- s- 201
Date submitted Jason Jasmy Khong 11031926
1 10 bull III ~
Imiddot
I
ABSTRACT
ARBITRAGE OPPORTUNITIES AND PRICING EFFICIENCY IN MALAYSIA FUTURES MARKET - KUALA LUMPUR STOCK EXCHANGE COMPOSITE
INDEX FUTURES (FKLI)
By
Jason Jasmy Khong
(A futures contract is defined as the agreement between two parties which are the seller
and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sell a certain product The contract states all the
details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity price and the delivery of the product
on a predetennined date Both parties have the responsibilities and obligations to carry out
the agreed transaction at the maturity date A futures contract is viewed as a hedging tool
by the market players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is
adverse price change in the market With the existence of stock indices futures contract
investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without changing their
portfolio compositi0o In order to be a good hedging tool hedging effectiveness is one the
important criteria to measure the performance of the futures contract It implies the
accuracy of the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Therefore pricing
of the futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future con~t Price ampmvergence~od~lbull indicates that price
discrepancies between the cash market and futur~s market should not last long An - ~
effective arbitrage activity is vital to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line
Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices do not deviate substantially from its
i IV bull middoti t-
~
fair price for a long period of time Therefore if arbitrage is not effective futures market
will not be a good hedging tool for the investor The general objective of this study is to
identify the arbitrage opportunities and pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Colnposite Index Futures (FKLI) The results show there are constant
happenings of negative basis price deviations in the FKLI contracts under the simple cost
of carry model This confinns that there are man opportunities available for traders to
undertake arbitrage activities The results also suggest that the pricing mechanism is
sensitive to the price volatility in the equity market Moreover there are still some
violations of the arbitrage free boundary remained in observation after testing under
different level of transaction costs which imply that the investor who is able to lower their
transaction costs will have greater exploitation to the arbitrage opportunities than others
shy
bull t
I ~
I V f
ABSTRAK
PELUANG ARBITRAJ DAN KECEKAPAN HARGA DI PASARAN KONTRAK NIAGA HADAPAN DI MALAYSIA - KONTRAK NIAGA HADAPAN INDEKS
SAHAM KUALA LUMPUR (FKLI) Oleh
Jason Jasmy Khong
Kontrak niaga hadapan adalah peIjanjian antara penjual dan pembeli sesuatu komoditi yang
menetapkan harga kuantiti dan kualiti komoditi tersebut dan masa bila urus niaga ini akan
berlaku Kontrak ini membawa kewajipan kepada kedua-dua pihak untuk menunaikan
syarat-syarat yang ditetapkan Salah satu kelebihan kontrak niaga hadapan adalah untuk
membekalkan peserta pasaran dengan alat perlindungan nilai yang dapat mengimbangi
risiko mereka dalam pasaran tunai Pengenalan kontrak niaga hadapan indeks saham
menyediakan altematif kepada pelabur untuk mengawal risiko pasaran dalam portfolio
mereka tanpa mengubah komposisi saham di dalam portfolio Keberkesanan lindung nitai
kontrak niaga hadapan bergantung kepada setakat mana kontrak itu dapat mencerminkan
pasaran asasnya dengan tepat Oleh sehab itu mekanisme harga kontrak niaga hadapan
yang cekap adalah penting untuk memastikan salah harga antara pasaran tunai dan pasaran
niaga hadapan adalah minimum Dengan itu akitiviti arbitraj memainkan peranan yang
penting untuk memastikan kedua-dua harga di pasaran tunai dan pasaran niaga hadapan I t ~ _ bullbull~ -~~
adalah sejajar Perdagangan arbitraj yang aktif dapat mem~t~1iarga kontralc-kontrak
niaga adalah betul dan adil supaya objektif-kecekapan harga akan dipenuhi Kajian ini akan
memberi tumpuan ke atas pemeriksaan perbezaan antara harga sebenar kontrak niaga
hadapan indeks saham Kuala Lumpur (FKLI)middot di pasaran deng~ harga yang sepatutnyavi I I f
tbullbull ~
apabila dinilai dengan menggunakan kaedah cost of carry Kajian ini juga menguji
kewujudan peluang arbitraj selepas mengambil pertimbangan tentang kos transaksi Di
samping itu kertas ini juga cuba untuk menentukan sarna ada kecekapan harga di pasaran niaga hadapln indeks saham di Malaysia telah meningkat sepanjang masa Keputusan
daripada kajian tersebut menunjukkan bahawa kejadian salah harga antara harga sebenar
dengan harga teori berlaku dengan kerap dan be~erusan Selepas mengambil pertimbangan
tentang kos urusniaga beberapa kejadian salah harga yang melebihi batasan tanpa arbitrage
~ masih dapat diperhatikan lni menunjukkan bahawa peluang arbitraj masih wujud untuk
pedagang yang menghadapi kos transaksi yang lebih rendah Dari segi kecekapan harga
pasaran niaga hadapan memperolehi prestasi yang lebih baik selepas krisis subprime 2008
ketika ekonomi sedang memasuki peringkat pemulihan
-shy middot - t ~middotmiddot middot middot ~middot middot r~=-~ bull-~
bull t
t
I bullbull Vll I (I bull tmiddot
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all I would like to express my deepest and most sincere gratitude to my project paper ~pervisor of the Faculty Economics and Business Assoc Prof Venus Liew
Khim Sen for continuously supporting me throughout the completion of project paper
period His patience and enthusiasm always motivafes me to write a good project paper In
addition his willingness to share his wide knowledge allows me to improve and gain more
knowledge each time we meet Without his guidance I would not able to complete my
project paper on time
Next I would like to thank my parents and family for giving me the encouragement
and financial support to pursue MBA With their support I am able to persevere and
eventually finish my project paper and coursework Finally I would like to thank all my
course mates for always being there and helping me whenever I faced with any obstacles or
difficulties in my study
shy
viii t I II
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARAWAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY III
ABSTRACT IV
ABSTRAK VI
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Vlll
LIST OF TABLES Xl
LIST OF FIGURES Xll
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Xlll
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction 1
12 Background of Study 6
13 Problem Statement 10
14 Research Question 11
15 Research Objectives 11
16 Significance of Study 12
17 Organization of Study 13
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
21 Introduction 14
22 The Stock Index Futures Pricing Model in a Perfect Market (No 16
Transaction Cost)
23 The Cost of Carry Model in an Imperfect Market bull - 21
231 Difficulty ofTrad~g th~ u~d~rrYimiddot~glnaex~ask~ ~i 4middot 22 bull
232 Regulatory Restrictions and Barriers -shy 24
233 Transaction Costs 28
234 Stochastic Interest Rate 33
235 Tax and Tax Timing Option 33
ix
i tt bull (0 II I
236 Dividend Misspecification 34
24 Market Efficiency and Relationship between Stock Futures Index 35
and Cash Price Index
CHAPTER ~ RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
31 Introduction 38
32 Data 38
33 Methodology 39
33 1 Arbitrage Opportunities under Cost of Carry Model 39
332 Constructing the Arbitrage-Free Boundary 42
333 Mispricing of FKLI Futures Contract in Malaysia Futures 45
Market
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
41 Arbitrage Opportunities Under Simple Cost of Carry Model 46
42 Arbitrage Opportunities after Transaction Costs 53
43 Pricing Efficiency in Malaysia Stocks Index Futures (FKLI) Market 56
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION
51 Introduction 61
52 Major Findings of Study 62
53 Implication and Recommendation of Study 63
REFERENCES 64
t~ i
_ ~
I X bull i i bull t shy
List of Tables Page
Table 11 Specifications of FKLI futures contract 8
Table 31 bommissions on Trading of Stocks and Futures Contracts 43
43
Table 41 Average monthly mispricing of the FKLI futures contracts 52
Table 42 Arbitrage Opportunities under Differe~t Level of Transaction 55
Costs
Table 43 Standard error between the actual closing price and 58
theoretical price
Table 44 Summary of regression analysis between actual and 60
theoretical price
Table 32 Total Transaction Costs Involved in Index Arbitrage
bull I
xi I I
List of Figures Page
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures 9
Contract Figure 41 Plots of Futures Premium from Jan 2001 to Dec 2010 50
Figure 42 Distribution of the FKLI contracts premium 51
Figure 43 Plots of standard error between the ackl futures price and 58
theoretical price
xii I i ~ bull t jj
I
List of Abbreviations
8MD Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad
FBMKLCI FTSE Bursa Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
FKLI FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI Futures
KLCI Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
KLOFFE Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financi~ Futures Exchange
MDEX Malaysian Derivatives Exchange Berhad
SampPSOO Standard and Poors 500 Index ~
SPDR Standard and Poors Depository Receipt
ETF Exchange Traded Fund
1 bull
xiii t J
~
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction
The finan~ial world has witnessed more and more attention in the area of
derivative financial instruments in the preceding years Derivatives have gained
reputation and popularity to become the proven form ~frisk management tools Amidst
the few derivatives instruments futures are among the measures that have been widely
used by corporations as a way of protection against unpredictable outcomes of the
markets Futures markets are derivatives markets that exist due to the existence of cash
market The futures markets plays a key role in managing risks related to the
adjustment in price volatility of some assets as well as to provide the opportunities for
speculators (Normas Izani Rasidah amp Saiful 2012)
Futures market was originated from commodities trading especially for
agricultural products A futures contract is defmed as the agreement between two
parties which are the seller and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sen a certain
product The contract states all the details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity
price and the delivery of the product on a predetermined date Both parties have the
responsibilities and obligations to carry outthe ~lt~~~1saction at the maturity date - middot ~ r- ~ t f gtlO p
Nowadays futures market is more popular and widely used in financial sector
- _
Various types of equity and financial derivatives are offered by the futures market in
order to facilitate the trading These derivative products have a wide coverage which
includes currency interbank offer rate government securities ~ock indices and etc ~ t ) -1
1
The futures market is mainly made up by 3 types of market players who are known as
hedgers speculators and arbitrageurs
Hedger is usually a real investor who has taken a position in cash market He uses
futures as insuQince to hedge his portfolio risk in order to minimize his loss if
something happen out of his expectation Hedging refers to a position established in
one market in an attempt to offset exposure to pri(4e fluctuations in the opposite
position in another market with the goal of minimizing ones exposure to unwanted
risk For example fund managers are perpetually with stocks in hand therefore their
risk exposure to the market would be enhanced in declining markets A fund manager
expects that in two months time the share prices will appreciate However he is
worried that unforeseen events may cause prices to decline prior to the time he would
sell his stocks He chooses to trade on BMD and hedges his position by selling the
forward FKLI contract In doing so he haS effectively agreed to lock-in his future
selling price today for a contract that will expire in two months time
Besides hedging FKLI is also used for arbitraging by arbitrageurs When
derivatives are trading above and below their theoretical fair value it is possible to
undertake arbitrage strategies by buying or selling the derivatives and simultaneously
selling or purchasing the underlying st~ks For example the fund manager realizes t- fi~ bull r-~ bull
bull If ~ i 1
that the correlation prices of the cash market and the FKLI market has deviated from bull
If
its usual spreads and that the FKLI is trading at a premium to the cash market
Arbitrage can take place by selling FKLI and buying the underlying shares in the
equity market The position will be liquidated later once the spread o(the prices it tmiddot
~
2
between both markets return to it fair value
However trading of futures contracts by speculators are just like a gambling
activity They are not planning to taking delivery but merely expecting to earn profit
from the differqtce of prices by buying the contract with lower price and selling it with
higher price (Chance amp Brooks 2010) They will observe the trading patterns and post
data on reactions to market announcements to make estimate on possible bullish or
bearish trends For example the fund manger expects a spike up in prices in
anticipation of an increase in buying activities by foreign funds based on the positive
economic data of the country It naturally will increase its exposure and may purchase
stocks and FKLJ simultaneously to maximize its buylong portfolio position
As mentioned earlier futures market is viewed as a hedging tool by the market
players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is adverse
price change in the market Prior to 198~ investors in stock market are having
difficulties in controlling their market risk With the existence of stock indices futures
contract investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without
changing their portfolio composition Due to the low transaction cost involved
investors favor to use stock index futures as a hedging tool This has been proven by
the drastic growth in the futures contrac~ tra9ing volume over the few decades (Gosh bull ~~ middot~i middot
1993)
In order to be a good hedging tool hedgi~g effectiveness is one the important
criteria to measure the perfonnance of the futures contract It implies the accuracy of
the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Ther~for~pricing of the ~ 1 -
3
futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future contract The futures contracts should be priced under an
efficient mechanism to minimize the possibility of mispricing According to Merrick
(1988) misprJcing of futures contract has 3 implications on hedging First when there
is mispricing on the contract hedging will not be riskless if the hedger does not hold
the contract until its maturity date Under the efficient pricing mechanism the return
on a future~ash hedge will purely depend on the relative movement of the futures
price versus its spot price However the existence of mispricing will include a
stochastic component into the consideration Second if there is a correlation between
mispricing and futures return the hedge ratios calculated may not fulfill the variance
minimization rule Third mispricing also has impact on the cost of hedging In general
if the futures contract is overpriced in the first place a short term long cash hedge
gains more than its fair return On the contrary the gain will be lesser than fair returns
if the contract is underpriced
Despite futures contracts and its underlying are traded in different markets the
price movements in two markets have to be in line As the futures contract approaching
its maturity date its price shall gradually converge to its underlying spot price
prevailing in cash market The diffetence be~een the spot price of the underlying ~ bull ~ r-~ bull
bull ~ middot ~ ~ bull ~ t
instrument and price of the futures contract is known as basis It is the net cost of
carrying the futures contract to the maturity date For financial futures the financing
cost for the margin requirement is the primary component of the basis and equity
based futures will have to factor in the dividends receivabl~ by pn 9~er of physical ~t bull I
4
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY
The work describe in this project entitled
ARBITRAGE OPPORTUNITIES AND PRICING EFFICIENCY IN MALAYSIA FUTURES MARKET - KUALA LUMPUR STOCK EXCHANGE COMPOSITE middot
INDEX FUTURES (FKLI)
is to the best of the authors knowledge that ofthe author except
where due reference is made
1- s- 201
Date submitted Jason Jasmy Khong 11031926
1 10 bull III ~
Imiddot
I
ABSTRACT
ARBITRAGE OPPORTUNITIES AND PRICING EFFICIENCY IN MALAYSIA FUTURES MARKET - KUALA LUMPUR STOCK EXCHANGE COMPOSITE
INDEX FUTURES (FKLI)
By
Jason Jasmy Khong
(A futures contract is defined as the agreement between two parties which are the seller
and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sell a certain product The contract states all the
details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity price and the delivery of the product
on a predetennined date Both parties have the responsibilities and obligations to carry out
the agreed transaction at the maturity date A futures contract is viewed as a hedging tool
by the market players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is
adverse price change in the market With the existence of stock indices futures contract
investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without changing their
portfolio compositi0o In order to be a good hedging tool hedging effectiveness is one the
important criteria to measure the performance of the futures contract It implies the
accuracy of the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Therefore pricing
of the futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future con~t Price ampmvergence~od~lbull indicates that price
discrepancies between the cash market and futur~s market should not last long An - ~
effective arbitrage activity is vital to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line
Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices do not deviate substantially from its
i IV bull middoti t-
~
fair price for a long period of time Therefore if arbitrage is not effective futures market
will not be a good hedging tool for the investor The general objective of this study is to
identify the arbitrage opportunities and pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Colnposite Index Futures (FKLI) The results show there are constant
happenings of negative basis price deviations in the FKLI contracts under the simple cost
of carry model This confinns that there are man opportunities available for traders to
undertake arbitrage activities The results also suggest that the pricing mechanism is
sensitive to the price volatility in the equity market Moreover there are still some
violations of the arbitrage free boundary remained in observation after testing under
different level of transaction costs which imply that the investor who is able to lower their
transaction costs will have greater exploitation to the arbitrage opportunities than others
shy
bull t
I ~
I V f
ABSTRAK
PELUANG ARBITRAJ DAN KECEKAPAN HARGA DI PASARAN KONTRAK NIAGA HADAPAN DI MALAYSIA - KONTRAK NIAGA HADAPAN INDEKS
SAHAM KUALA LUMPUR (FKLI) Oleh
Jason Jasmy Khong
Kontrak niaga hadapan adalah peIjanjian antara penjual dan pembeli sesuatu komoditi yang
menetapkan harga kuantiti dan kualiti komoditi tersebut dan masa bila urus niaga ini akan
berlaku Kontrak ini membawa kewajipan kepada kedua-dua pihak untuk menunaikan
syarat-syarat yang ditetapkan Salah satu kelebihan kontrak niaga hadapan adalah untuk
membekalkan peserta pasaran dengan alat perlindungan nilai yang dapat mengimbangi
risiko mereka dalam pasaran tunai Pengenalan kontrak niaga hadapan indeks saham
menyediakan altematif kepada pelabur untuk mengawal risiko pasaran dalam portfolio
mereka tanpa mengubah komposisi saham di dalam portfolio Keberkesanan lindung nitai
kontrak niaga hadapan bergantung kepada setakat mana kontrak itu dapat mencerminkan
pasaran asasnya dengan tepat Oleh sehab itu mekanisme harga kontrak niaga hadapan
yang cekap adalah penting untuk memastikan salah harga antara pasaran tunai dan pasaran
niaga hadapan adalah minimum Dengan itu akitiviti arbitraj memainkan peranan yang
penting untuk memastikan kedua-dua harga di pasaran tunai dan pasaran niaga hadapan I t ~ _ bullbull~ -~~
adalah sejajar Perdagangan arbitraj yang aktif dapat mem~t~1iarga kontralc-kontrak
niaga adalah betul dan adil supaya objektif-kecekapan harga akan dipenuhi Kajian ini akan
memberi tumpuan ke atas pemeriksaan perbezaan antara harga sebenar kontrak niaga
hadapan indeks saham Kuala Lumpur (FKLI)middot di pasaran deng~ harga yang sepatutnyavi I I f
tbullbull ~
apabila dinilai dengan menggunakan kaedah cost of carry Kajian ini juga menguji
kewujudan peluang arbitraj selepas mengambil pertimbangan tentang kos transaksi Di
samping itu kertas ini juga cuba untuk menentukan sarna ada kecekapan harga di pasaran niaga hadapln indeks saham di Malaysia telah meningkat sepanjang masa Keputusan
daripada kajian tersebut menunjukkan bahawa kejadian salah harga antara harga sebenar
dengan harga teori berlaku dengan kerap dan be~erusan Selepas mengambil pertimbangan
tentang kos urusniaga beberapa kejadian salah harga yang melebihi batasan tanpa arbitrage
~ masih dapat diperhatikan lni menunjukkan bahawa peluang arbitraj masih wujud untuk
pedagang yang menghadapi kos transaksi yang lebih rendah Dari segi kecekapan harga
pasaran niaga hadapan memperolehi prestasi yang lebih baik selepas krisis subprime 2008
ketika ekonomi sedang memasuki peringkat pemulihan
-shy middot - t ~middotmiddot middot middot ~middot middot r~=-~ bull-~
bull t
t
I bullbull Vll I (I bull tmiddot
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all I would like to express my deepest and most sincere gratitude to my project paper ~pervisor of the Faculty Economics and Business Assoc Prof Venus Liew
Khim Sen for continuously supporting me throughout the completion of project paper
period His patience and enthusiasm always motivafes me to write a good project paper In
addition his willingness to share his wide knowledge allows me to improve and gain more
knowledge each time we meet Without his guidance I would not able to complete my
project paper on time
Next I would like to thank my parents and family for giving me the encouragement
and financial support to pursue MBA With their support I am able to persevere and
eventually finish my project paper and coursework Finally I would like to thank all my
course mates for always being there and helping me whenever I faced with any obstacles or
difficulties in my study
shy
viii t I II
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARAWAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY III
ABSTRACT IV
ABSTRAK VI
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Vlll
LIST OF TABLES Xl
LIST OF FIGURES Xll
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Xlll
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction 1
12 Background of Study 6
13 Problem Statement 10
14 Research Question 11
15 Research Objectives 11
16 Significance of Study 12
17 Organization of Study 13
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
21 Introduction 14
22 The Stock Index Futures Pricing Model in a Perfect Market (No 16
Transaction Cost)
23 The Cost of Carry Model in an Imperfect Market bull - 21
231 Difficulty ofTrad~g th~ u~d~rrYimiddot~glnaex~ask~ ~i 4middot 22 bull
232 Regulatory Restrictions and Barriers -shy 24
233 Transaction Costs 28
234 Stochastic Interest Rate 33
235 Tax and Tax Timing Option 33
ix
i tt bull (0 II I
236 Dividend Misspecification 34
24 Market Efficiency and Relationship between Stock Futures Index 35
and Cash Price Index
CHAPTER ~ RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
31 Introduction 38
32 Data 38
33 Methodology 39
33 1 Arbitrage Opportunities under Cost of Carry Model 39
332 Constructing the Arbitrage-Free Boundary 42
333 Mispricing of FKLI Futures Contract in Malaysia Futures 45
Market
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
41 Arbitrage Opportunities Under Simple Cost of Carry Model 46
42 Arbitrage Opportunities after Transaction Costs 53
43 Pricing Efficiency in Malaysia Stocks Index Futures (FKLI) Market 56
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION
51 Introduction 61
52 Major Findings of Study 62
53 Implication and Recommendation of Study 63
REFERENCES 64
t~ i
_ ~
I X bull i i bull t shy
List of Tables Page
Table 11 Specifications of FKLI futures contract 8
Table 31 bommissions on Trading of Stocks and Futures Contracts 43
43
Table 41 Average monthly mispricing of the FKLI futures contracts 52
Table 42 Arbitrage Opportunities under Differe~t Level of Transaction 55
Costs
Table 43 Standard error between the actual closing price and 58
theoretical price
Table 44 Summary of regression analysis between actual and 60
theoretical price
Table 32 Total Transaction Costs Involved in Index Arbitrage
bull I
xi I I
List of Figures Page
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures 9
Contract Figure 41 Plots of Futures Premium from Jan 2001 to Dec 2010 50
Figure 42 Distribution of the FKLI contracts premium 51
Figure 43 Plots of standard error between the ackl futures price and 58
theoretical price
xii I i ~ bull t jj
I
List of Abbreviations
8MD Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad
FBMKLCI FTSE Bursa Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
FKLI FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI Futures
KLCI Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
KLOFFE Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financi~ Futures Exchange
MDEX Malaysian Derivatives Exchange Berhad
SampPSOO Standard and Poors 500 Index ~
SPDR Standard and Poors Depository Receipt
ETF Exchange Traded Fund
1 bull
xiii t J
~
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction
The finan~ial world has witnessed more and more attention in the area of
derivative financial instruments in the preceding years Derivatives have gained
reputation and popularity to become the proven form ~frisk management tools Amidst
the few derivatives instruments futures are among the measures that have been widely
used by corporations as a way of protection against unpredictable outcomes of the
markets Futures markets are derivatives markets that exist due to the existence of cash
market The futures markets plays a key role in managing risks related to the
adjustment in price volatility of some assets as well as to provide the opportunities for
speculators (Normas Izani Rasidah amp Saiful 2012)
Futures market was originated from commodities trading especially for
agricultural products A futures contract is defmed as the agreement between two
parties which are the seller and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sen a certain
product The contract states all the details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity
price and the delivery of the product on a predetermined date Both parties have the
responsibilities and obligations to carry outthe ~lt~~~1saction at the maturity date - middot ~ r- ~ t f gtlO p
Nowadays futures market is more popular and widely used in financial sector
- _
Various types of equity and financial derivatives are offered by the futures market in
order to facilitate the trading These derivative products have a wide coverage which
includes currency interbank offer rate government securities ~ock indices and etc ~ t ) -1
1
The futures market is mainly made up by 3 types of market players who are known as
hedgers speculators and arbitrageurs
Hedger is usually a real investor who has taken a position in cash market He uses
futures as insuQince to hedge his portfolio risk in order to minimize his loss if
something happen out of his expectation Hedging refers to a position established in
one market in an attempt to offset exposure to pri(4e fluctuations in the opposite
position in another market with the goal of minimizing ones exposure to unwanted
risk For example fund managers are perpetually with stocks in hand therefore their
risk exposure to the market would be enhanced in declining markets A fund manager
expects that in two months time the share prices will appreciate However he is
worried that unforeseen events may cause prices to decline prior to the time he would
sell his stocks He chooses to trade on BMD and hedges his position by selling the
forward FKLI contract In doing so he haS effectively agreed to lock-in his future
selling price today for a contract that will expire in two months time
Besides hedging FKLI is also used for arbitraging by arbitrageurs When
derivatives are trading above and below their theoretical fair value it is possible to
undertake arbitrage strategies by buying or selling the derivatives and simultaneously
selling or purchasing the underlying st~ks For example the fund manager realizes t- fi~ bull r-~ bull
bull If ~ i 1
that the correlation prices of the cash market and the FKLI market has deviated from bull
If
its usual spreads and that the FKLI is trading at a premium to the cash market
Arbitrage can take place by selling FKLI and buying the underlying shares in the
equity market The position will be liquidated later once the spread o(the prices it tmiddot
~
2
between both markets return to it fair value
However trading of futures contracts by speculators are just like a gambling
activity They are not planning to taking delivery but merely expecting to earn profit
from the differqtce of prices by buying the contract with lower price and selling it with
higher price (Chance amp Brooks 2010) They will observe the trading patterns and post
data on reactions to market announcements to make estimate on possible bullish or
bearish trends For example the fund manger expects a spike up in prices in
anticipation of an increase in buying activities by foreign funds based on the positive
economic data of the country It naturally will increase its exposure and may purchase
stocks and FKLJ simultaneously to maximize its buylong portfolio position
As mentioned earlier futures market is viewed as a hedging tool by the market
players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is adverse
price change in the market Prior to 198~ investors in stock market are having
difficulties in controlling their market risk With the existence of stock indices futures
contract investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without
changing their portfolio composition Due to the low transaction cost involved
investors favor to use stock index futures as a hedging tool This has been proven by
the drastic growth in the futures contrac~ tra9ing volume over the few decades (Gosh bull ~~ middot~i middot
1993)
In order to be a good hedging tool hedgi~g effectiveness is one the important
criteria to measure the perfonnance of the futures contract It implies the accuracy of
the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Ther~for~pricing of the ~ 1 -
3
futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future contract The futures contracts should be priced under an
efficient mechanism to minimize the possibility of mispricing According to Merrick
(1988) misprJcing of futures contract has 3 implications on hedging First when there
is mispricing on the contract hedging will not be riskless if the hedger does not hold
the contract until its maturity date Under the efficient pricing mechanism the return
on a future~ash hedge will purely depend on the relative movement of the futures
price versus its spot price However the existence of mispricing will include a
stochastic component into the consideration Second if there is a correlation between
mispricing and futures return the hedge ratios calculated may not fulfill the variance
minimization rule Third mispricing also has impact on the cost of hedging In general
if the futures contract is overpriced in the first place a short term long cash hedge
gains more than its fair return On the contrary the gain will be lesser than fair returns
if the contract is underpriced
Despite futures contracts and its underlying are traded in different markets the
price movements in two markets have to be in line As the futures contract approaching
its maturity date its price shall gradually converge to its underlying spot price
prevailing in cash market The diffetence be~een the spot price of the underlying ~ bull ~ r-~ bull
bull ~ middot ~ ~ bull ~ t
instrument and price of the futures contract is known as basis It is the net cost of
carrying the futures contract to the maturity date For financial futures the financing
cost for the margin requirement is the primary component of the basis and equity
based futures will have to factor in the dividends receivabl~ by pn 9~er of physical ~t bull I
4
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
Imiddot
I
ABSTRACT
ARBITRAGE OPPORTUNITIES AND PRICING EFFICIENCY IN MALAYSIA FUTURES MARKET - KUALA LUMPUR STOCK EXCHANGE COMPOSITE
INDEX FUTURES (FKLI)
By
Jason Jasmy Khong
(A futures contract is defined as the agreement between two parties which are the seller
and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sell a certain product The contract states all the
details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity price and the delivery of the product
on a predetennined date Both parties have the responsibilities and obligations to carry out
the agreed transaction at the maturity date A futures contract is viewed as a hedging tool
by the market players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is
adverse price change in the market With the existence of stock indices futures contract
investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without changing their
portfolio compositi0o In order to be a good hedging tool hedging effectiveness is one the
important criteria to measure the performance of the futures contract It implies the
accuracy of the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Therefore pricing
of the futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future con~t Price ampmvergence~od~lbull indicates that price
discrepancies between the cash market and futur~s market should not last long An - ~
effective arbitrage activity is vital to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line
Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices do not deviate substantially from its
i IV bull middoti t-
~
fair price for a long period of time Therefore if arbitrage is not effective futures market
will not be a good hedging tool for the investor The general objective of this study is to
identify the arbitrage opportunities and pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Colnposite Index Futures (FKLI) The results show there are constant
happenings of negative basis price deviations in the FKLI contracts under the simple cost
of carry model This confinns that there are man opportunities available for traders to
undertake arbitrage activities The results also suggest that the pricing mechanism is
sensitive to the price volatility in the equity market Moreover there are still some
violations of the arbitrage free boundary remained in observation after testing under
different level of transaction costs which imply that the investor who is able to lower their
transaction costs will have greater exploitation to the arbitrage opportunities than others
shy
bull t
I ~
I V f
ABSTRAK
PELUANG ARBITRAJ DAN KECEKAPAN HARGA DI PASARAN KONTRAK NIAGA HADAPAN DI MALAYSIA - KONTRAK NIAGA HADAPAN INDEKS
SAHAM KUALA LUMPUR (FKLI) Oleh
Jason Jasmy Khong
Kontrak niaga hadapan adalah peIjanjian antara penjual dan pembeli sesuatu komoditi yang
menetapkan harga kuantiti dan kualiti komoditi tersebut dan masa bila urus niaga ini akan
berlaku Kontrak ini membawa kewajipan kepada kedua-dua pihak untuk menunaikan
syarat-syarat yang ditetapkan Salah satu kelebihan kontrak niaga hadapan adalah untuk
membekalkan peserta pasaran dengan alat perlindungan nilai yang dapat mengimbangi
risiko mereka dalam pasaran tunai Pengenalan kontrak niaga hadapan indeks saham
menyediakan altematif kepada pelabur untuk mengawal risiko pasaran dalam portfolio
mereka tanpa mengubah komposisi saham di dalam portfolio Keberkesanan lindung nitai
kontrak niaga hadapan bergantung kepada setakat mana kontrak itu dapat mencerminkan
pasaran asasnya dengan tepat Oleh sehab itu mekanisme harga kontrak niaga hadapan
yang cekap adalah penting untuk memastikan salah harga antara pasaran tunai dan pasaran
niaga hadapan adalah minimum Dengan itu akitiviti arbitraj memainkan peranan yang
penting untuk memastikan kedua-dua harga di pasaran tunai dan pasaran niaga hadapan I t ~ _ bullbull~ -~~
adalah sejajar Perdagangan arbitraj yang aktif dapat mem~t~1iarga kontralc-kontrak
niaga adalah betul dan adil supaya objektif-kecekapan harga akan dipenuhi Kajian ini akan
memberi tumpuan ke atas pemeriksaan perbezaan antara harga sebenar kontrak niaga
hadapan indeks saham Kuala Lumpur (FKLI)middot di pasaran deng~ harga yang sepatutnyavi I I f
tbullbull ~
apabila dinilai dengan menggunakan kaedah cost of carry Kajian ini juga menguji
kewujudan peluang arbitraj selepas mengambil pertimbangan tentang kos transaksi Di
samping itu kertas ini juga cuba untuk menentukan sarna ada kecekapan harga di pasaran niaga hadapln indeks saham di Malaysia telah meningkat sepanjang masa Keputusan
daripada kajian tersebut menunjukkan bahawa kejadian salah harga antara harga sebenar
dengan harga teori berlaku dengan kerap dan be~erusan Selepas mengambil pertimbangan
tentang kos urusniaga beberapa kejadian salah harga yang melebihi batasan tanpa arbitrage
~ masih dapat diperhatikan lni menunjukkan bahawa peluang arbitraj masih wujud untuk
pedagang yang menghadapi kos transaksi yang lebih rendah Dari segi kecekapan harga
pasaran niaga hadapan memperolehi prestasi yang lebih baik selepas krisis subprime 2008
ketika ekonomi sedang memasuki peringkat pemulihan
-shy middot - t ~middotmiddot middot middot ~middot middot r~=-~ bull-~
bull t
t
I bullbull Vll I (I bull tmiddot
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all I would like to express my deepest and most sincere gratitude to my project paper ~pervisor of the Faculty Economics and Business Assoc Prof Venus Liew
Khim Sen for continuously supporting me throughout the completion of project paper
period His patience and enthusiasm always motivafes me to write a good project paper In
addition his willingness to share his wide knowledge allows me to improve and gain more
knowledge each time we meet Without his guidance I would not able to complete my
project paper on time
Next I would like to thank my parents and family for giving me the encouragement
and financial support to pursue MBA With their support I am able to persevere and
eventually finish my project paper and coursework Finally I would like to thank all my
course mates for always being there and helping me whenever I faced with any obstacles or
difficulties in my study
shy
viii t I II
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARAWAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY III
ABSTRACT IV
ABSTRAK VI
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Vlll
LIST OF TABLES Xl
LIST OF FIGURES Xll
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Xlll
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction 1
12 Background of Study 6
13 Problem Statement 10
14 Research Question 11
15 Research Objectives 11
16 Significance of Study 12
17 Organization of Study 13
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
21 Introduction 14
22 The Stock Index Futures Pricing Model in a Perfect Market (No 16
Transaction Cost)
23 The Cost of Carry Model in an Imperfect Market bull - 21
231 Difficulty ofTrad~g th~ u~d~rrYimiddot~glnaex~ask~ ~i 4middot 22 bull
232 Regulatory Restrictions and Barriers -shy 24
233 Transaction Costs 28
234 Stochastic Interest Rate 33
235 Tax and Tax Timing Option 33
ix
i tt bull (0 II I
236 Dividend Misspecification 34
24 Market Efficiency and Relationship between Stock Futures Index 35
and Cash Price Index
CHAPTER ~ RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
31 Introduction 38
32 Data 38
33 Methodology 39
33 1 Arbitrage Opportunities under Cost of Carry Model 39
332 Constructing the Arbitrage-Free Boundary 42
333 Mispricing of FKLI Futures Contract in Malaysia Futures 45
Market
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
41 Arbitrage Opportunities Under Simple Cost of Carry Model 46
42 Arbitrage Opportunities after Transaction Costs 53
43 Pricing Efficiency in Malaysia Stocks Index Futures (FKLI) Market 56
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION
51 Introduction 61
52 Major Findings of Study 62
53 Implication and Recommendation of Study 63
REFERENCES 64
t~ i
_ ~
I X bull i i bull t shy
List of Tables Page
Table 11 Specifications of FKLI futures contract 8
Table 31 bommissions on Trading of Stocks and Futures Contracts 43
43
Table 41 Average monthly mispricing of the FKLI futures contracts 52
Table 42 Arbitrage Opportunities under Differe~t Level of Transaction 55
Costs
Table 43 Standard error between the actual closing price and 58
theoretical price
Table 44 Summary of regression analysis between actual and 60
theoretical price
Table 32 Total Transaction Costs Involved in Index Arbitrage
bull I
xi I I
List of Figures Page
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures 9
Contract Figure 41 Plots of Futures Premium from Jan 2001 to Dec 2010 50
Figure 42 Distribution of the FKLI contracts premium 51
Figure 43 Plots of standard error between the ackl futures price and 58
theoretical price
xii I i ~ bull t jj
I
List of Abbreviations
8MD Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad
FBMKLCI FTSE Bursa Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
FKLI FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI Futures
KLCI Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
KLOFFE Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financi~ Futures Exchange
MDEX Malaysian Derivatives Exchange Berhad
SampPSOO Standard and Poors 500 Index ~
SPDR Standard and Poors Depository Receipt
ETF Exchange Traded Fund
1 bull
xiii t J
~
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction
The finan~ial world has witnessed more and more attention in the area of
derivative financial instruments in the preceding years Derivatives have gained
reputation and popularity to become the proven form ~frisk management tools Amidst
the few derivatives instruments futures are among the measures that have been widely
used by corporations as a way of protection against unpredictable outcomes of the
markets Futures markets are derivatives markets that exist due to the existence of cash
market The futures markets plays a key role in managing risks related to the
adjustment in price volatility of some assets as well as to provide the opportunities for
speculators (Normas Izani Rasidah amp Saiful 2012)
Futures market was originated from commodities trading especially for
agricultural products A futures contract is defmed as the agreement between two
parties which are the seller and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sen a certain
product The contract states all the details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity
price and the delivery of the product on a predetermined date Both parties have the
responsibilities and obligations to carry outthe ~lt~~~1saction at the maturity date - middot ~ r- ~ t f gtlO p
Nowadays futures market is more popular and widely used in financial sector
- _
Various types of equity and financial derivatives are offered by the futures market in
order to facilitate the trading These derivative products have a wide coverage which
includes currency interbank offer rate government securities ~ock indices and etc ~ t ) -1
1
The futures market is mainly made up by 3 types of market players who are known as
hedgers speculators and arbitrageurs
Hedger is usually a real investor who has taken a position in cash market He uses
futures as insuQince to hedge his portfolio risk in order to minimize his loss if
something happen out of his expectation Hedging refers to a position established in
one market in an attempt to offset exposure to pri(4e fluctuations in the opposite
position in another market with the goal of minimizing ones exposure to unwanted
risk For example fund managers are perpetually with stocks in hand therefore their
risk exposure to the market would be enhanced in declining markets A fund manager
expects that in two months time the share prices will appreciate However he is
worried that unforeseen events may cause prices to decline prior to the time he would
sell his stocks He chooses to trade on BMD and hedges his position by selling the
forward FKLI contract In doing so he haS effectively agreed to lock-in his future
selling price today for a contract that will expire in two months time
Besides hedging FKLI is also used for arbitraging by arbitrageurs When
derivatives are trading above and below their theoretical fair value it is possible to
undertake arbitrage strategies by buying or selling the derivatives and simultaneously
selling or purchasing the underlying st~ks For example the fund manager realizes t- fi~ bull r-~ bull
bull If ~ i 1
that the correlation prices of the cash market and the FKLI market has deviated from bull
If
its usual spreads and that the FKLI is trading at a premium to the cash market
Arbitrage can take place by selling FKLI and buying the underlying shares in the
equity market The position will be liquidated later once the spread o(the prices it tmiddot
~
2
between both markets return to it fair value
However trading of futures contracts by speculators are just like a gambling
activity They are not planning to taking delivery but merely expecting to earn profit
from the differqtce of prices by buying the contract with lower price and selling it with
higher price (Chance amp Brooks 2010) They will observe the trading patterns and post
data on reactions to market announcements to make estimate on possible bullish or
bearish trends For example the fund manger expects a spike up in prices in
anticipation of an increase in buying activities by foreign funds based on the positive
economic data of the country It naturally will increase its exposure and may purchase
stocks and FKLJ simultaneously to maximize its buylong portfolio position
As mentioned earlier futures market is viewed as a hedging tool by the market
players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is adverse
price change in the market Prior to 198~ investors in stock market are having
difficulties in controlling their market risk With the existence of stock indices futures
contract investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without
changing their portfolio composition Due to the low transaction cost involved
investors favor to use stock index futures as a hedging tool This has been proven by
the drastic growth in the futures contrac~ tra9ing volume over the few decades (Gosh bull ~~ middot~i middot
1993)
In order to be a good hedging tool hedgi~g effectiveness is one the important
criteria to measure the perfonnance of the futures contract It implies the accuracy of
the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Ther~for~pricing of the ~ 1 -
3
futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future contract The futures contracts should be priced under an
efficient mechanism to minimize the possibility of mispricing According to Merrick
(1988) misprJcing of futures contract has 3 implications on hedging First when there
is mispricing on the contract hedging will not be riskless if the hedger does not hold
the contract until its maturity date Under the efficient pricing mechanism the return
on a future~ash hedge will purely depend on the relative movement of the futures
price versus its spot price However the existence of mispricing will include a
stochastic component into the consideration Second if there is a correlation between
mispricing and futures return the hedge ratios calculated may not fulfill the variance
minimization rule Third mispricing also has impact on the cost of hedging In general
if the futures contract is overpriced in the first place a short term long cash hedge
gains more than its fair return On the contrary the gain will be lesser than fair returns
if the contract is underpriced
Despite futures contracts and its underlying are traded in different markets the
price movements in two markets have to be in line As the futures contract approaching
its maturity date its price shall gradually converge to its underlying spot price
prevailing in cash market The diffetence be~een the spot price of the underlying ~ bull ~ r-~ bull
bull ~ middot ~ ~ bull ~ t
instrument and price of the futures contract is known as basis It is the net cost of
carrying the futures contract to the maturity date For financial futures the financing
cost for the margin requirement is the primary component of the basis and equity
based futures will have to factor in the dividends receivabl~ by pn 9~er of physical ~t bull I
4
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
fair price for a long period of time Therefore if arbitrage is not effective futures market
will not be a good hedging tool for the investor The general objective of this study is to
identify the arbitrage opportunities and pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Colnposite Index Futures (FKLI) The results show there are constant
happenings of negative basis price deviations in the FKLI contracts under the simple cost
of carry model This confinns that there are man opportunities available for traders to
undertake arbitrage activities The results also suggest that the pricing mechanism is
sensitive to the price volatility in the equity market Moreover there are still some
violations of the arbitrage free boundary remained in observation after testing under
different level of transaction costs which imply that the investor who is able to lower their
transaction costs will have greater exploitation to the arbitrage opportunities than others
shy
bull t
I ~
I V f
ABSTRAK
PELUANG ARBITRAJ DAN KECEKAPAN HARGA DI PASARAN KONTRAK NIAGA HADAPAN DI MALAYSIA - KONTRAK NIAGA HADAPAN INDEKS
SAHAM KUALA LUMPUR (FKLI) Oleh
Jason Jasmy Khong
Kontrak niaga hadapan adalah peIjanjian antara penjual dan pembeli sesuatu komoditi yang
menetapkan harga kuantiti dan kualiti komoditi tersebut dan masa bila urus niaga ini akan
berlaku Kontrak ini membawa kewajipan kepada kedua-dua pihak untuk menunaikan
syarat-syarat yang ditetapkan Salah satu kelebihan kontrak niaga hadapan adalah untuk
membekalkan peserta pasaran dengan alat perlindungan nilai yang dapat mengimbangi
risiko mereka dalam pasaran tunai Pengenalan kontrak niaga hadapan indeks saham
menyediakan altematif kepada pelabur untuk mengawal risiko pasaran dalam portfolio
mereka tanpa mengubah komposisi saham di dalam portfolio Keberkesanan lindung nitai
kontrak niaga hadapan bergantung kepada setakat mana kontrak itu dapat mencerminkan
pasaran asasnya dengan tepat Oleh sehab itu mekanisme harga kontrak niaga hadapan
yang cekap adalah penting untuk memastikan salah harga antara pasaran tunai dan pasaran
niaga hadapan adalah minimum Dengan itu akitiviti arbitraj memainkan peranan yang
penting untuk memastikan kedua-dua harga di pasaran tunai dan pasaran niaga hadapan I t ~ _ bullbull~ -~~
adalah sejajar Perdagangan arbitraj yang aktif dapat mem~t~1iarga kontralc-kontrak
niaga adalah betul dan adil supaya objektif-kecekapan harga akan dipenuhi Kajian ini akan
memberi tumpuan ke atas pemeriksaan perbezaan antara harga sebenar kontrak niaga
hadapan indeks saham Kuala Lumpur (FKLI)middot di pasaran deng~ harga yang sepatutnyavi I I f
tbullbull ~
apabila dinilai dengan menggunakan kaedah cost of carry Kajian ini juga menguji
kewujudan peluang arbitraj selepas mengambil pertimbangan tentang kos transaksi Di
samping itu kertas ini juga cuba untuk menentukan sarna ada kecekapan harga di pasaran niaga hadapln indeks saham di Malaysia telah meningkat sepanjang masa Keputusan
daripada kajian tersebut menunjukkan bahawa kejadian salah harga antara harga sebenar
dengan harga teori berlaku dengan kerap dan be~erusan Selepas mengambil pertimbangan
tentang kos urusniaga beberapa kejadian salah harga yang melebihi batasan tanpa arbitrage
~ masih dapat diperhatikan lni menunjukkan bahawa peluang arbitraj masih wujud untuk
pedagang yang menghadapi kos transaksi yang lebih rendah Dari segi kecekapan harga
pasaran niaga hadapan memperolehi prestasi yang lebih baik selepas krisis subprime 2008
ketika ekonomi sedang memasuki peringkat pemulihan
-shy middot - t ~middotmiddot middot middot ~middot middot r~=-~ bull-~
bull t
t
I bullbull Vll I (I bull tmiddot
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all I would like to express my deepest and most sincere gratitude to my project paper ~pervisor of the Faculty Economics and Business Assoc Prof Venus Liew
Khim Sen for continuously supporting me throughout the completion of project paper
period His patience and enthusiasm always motivafes me to write a good project paper In
addition his willingness to share his wide knowledge allows me to improve and gain more
knowledge each time we meet Without his guidance I would not able to complete my
project paper on time
Next I would like to thank my parents and family for giving me the encouragement
and financial support to pursue MBA With their support I am able to persevere and
eventually finish my project paper and coursework Finally I would like to thank all my
course mates for always being there and helping me whenever I faced with any obstacles or
difficulties in my study
shy
viii t I II
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARAWAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY III
ABSTRACT IV
ABSTRAK VI
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Vlll
LIST OF TABLES Xl
LIST OF FIGURES Xll
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Xlll
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction 1
12 Background of Study 6
13 Problem Statement 10
14 Research Question 11
15 Research Objectives 11
16 Significance of Study 12
17 Organization of Study 13
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
21 Introduction 14
22 The Stock Index Futures Pricing Model in a Perfect Market (No 16
Transaction Cost)
23 The Cost of Carry Model in an Imperfect Market bull - 21
231 Difficulty ofTrad~g th~ u~d~rrYimiddot~glnaex~ask~ ~i 4middot 22 bull
232 Regulatory Restrictions and Barriers -shy 24
233 Transaction Costs 28
234 Stochastic Interest Rate 33
235 Tax and Tax Timing Option 33
ix
i tt bull (0 II I
236 Dividend Misspecification 34
24 Market Efficiency and Relationship between Stock Futures Index 35
and Cash Price Index
CHAPTER ~ RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
31 Introduction 38
32 Data 38
33 Methodology 39
33 1 Arbitrage Opportunities under Cost of Carry Model 39
332 Constructing the Arbitrage-Free Boundary 42
333 Mispricing of FKLI Futures Contract in Malaysia Futures 45
Market
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
41 Arbitrage Opportunities Under Simple Cost of Carry Model 46
42 Arbitrage Opportunities after Transaction Costs 53
43 Pricing Efficiency in Malaysia Stocks Index Futures (FKLI) Market 56
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION
51 Introduction 61
52 Major Findings of Study 62
53 Implication and Recommendation of Study 63
REFERENCES 64
t~ i
_ ~
I X bull i i bull t shy
List of Tables Page
Table 11 Specifications of FKLI futures contract 8
Table 31 bommissions on Trading of Stocks and Futures Contracts 43
43
Table 41 Average monthly mispricing of the FKLI futures contracts 52
Table 42 Arbitrage Opportunities under Differe~t Level of Transaction 55
Costs
Table 43 Standard error between the actual closing price and 58
theoretical price
Table 44 Summary of regression analysis between actual and 60
theoretical price
Table 32 Total Transaction Costs Involved in Index Arbitrage
bull I
xi I I
List of Figures Page
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures 9
Contract Figure 41 Plots of Futures Premium from Jan 2001 to Dec 2010 50
Figure 42 Distribution of the FKLI contracts premium 51
Figure 43 Plots of standard error between the ackl futures price and 58
theoretical price
xii I i ~ bull t jj
I
List of Abbreviations
8MD Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad
FBMKLCI FTSE Bursa Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
FKLI FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI Futures
KLCI Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
KLOFFE Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financi~ Futures Exchange
MDEX Malaysian Derivatives Exchange Berhad
SampPSOO Standard and Poors 500 Index ~
SPDR Standard and Poors Depository Receipt
ETF Exchange Traded Fund
1 bull
xiii t J
~
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction
The finan~ial world has witnessed more and more attention in the area of
derivative financial instruments in the preceding years Derivatives have gained
reputation and popularity to become the proven form ~frisk management tools Amidst
the few derivatives instruments futures are among the measures that have been widely
used by corporations as a way of protection against unpredictable outcomes of the
markets Futures markets are derivatives markets that exist due to the existence of cash
market The futures markets plays a key role in managing risks related to the
adjustment in price volatility of some assets as well as to provide the opportunities for
speculators (Normas Izani Rasidah amp Saiful 2012)
Futures market was originated from commodities trading especially for
agricultural products A futures contract is defmed as the agreement between two
parties which are the seller and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sen a certain
product The contract states all the details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity
price and the delivery of the product on a predetermined date Both parties have the
responsibilities and obligations to carry outthe ~lt~~~1saction at the maturity date - middot ~ r- ~ t f gtlO p
Nowadays futures market is more popular and widely used in financial sector
- _
Various types of equity and financial derivatives are offered by the futures market in
order to facilitate the trading These derivative products have a wide coverage which
includes currency interbank offer rate government securities ~ock indices and etc ~ t ) -1
1
The futures market is mainly made up by 3 types of market players who are known as
hedgers speculators and arbitrageurs
Hedger is usually a real investor who has taken a position in cash market He uses
futures as insuQince to hedge his portfolio risk in order to minimize his loss if
something happen out of his expectation Hedging refers to a position established in
one market in an attempt to offset exposure to pri(4e fluctuations in the opposite
position in another market with the goal of minimizing ones exposure to unwanted
risk For example fund managers are perpetually with stocks in hand therefore their
risk exposure to the market would be enhanced in declining markets A fund manager
expects that in two months time the share prices will appreciate However he is
worried that unforeseen events may cause prices to decline prior to the time he would
sell his stocks He chooses to trade on BMD and hedges his position by selling the
forward FKLI contract In doing so he haS effectively agreed to lock-in his future
selling price today for a contract that will expire in two months time
Besides hedging FKLI is also used for arbitraging by arbitrageurs When
derivatives are trading above and below their theoretical fair value it is possible to
undertake arbitrage strategies by buying or selling the derivatives and simultaneously
selling or purchasing the underlying st~ks For example the fund manager realizes t- fi~ bull r-~ bull
bull If ~ i 1
that the correlation prices of the cash market and the FKLI market has deviated from bull
If
its usual spreads and that the FKLI is trading at a premium to the cash market
Arbitrage can take place by selling FKLI and buying the underlying shares in the
equity market The position will be liquidated later once the spread o(the prices it tmiddot
~
2
between both markets return to it fair value
However trading of futures contracts by speculators are just like a gambling
activity They are not planning to taking delivery but merely expecting to earn profit
from the differqtce of prices by buying the contract with lower price and selling it with
higher price (Chance amp Brooks 2010) They will observe the trading patterns and post
data on reactions to market announcements to make estimate on possible bullish or
bearish trends For example the fund manger expects a spike up in prices in
anticipation of an increase in buying activities by foreign funds based on the positive
economic data of the country It naturally will increase its exposure and may purchase
stocks and FKLJ simultaneously to maximize its buylong portfolio position
As mentioned earlier futures market is viewed as a hedging tool by the market
players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is adverse
price change in the market Prior to 198~ investors in stock market are having
difficulties in controlling their market risk With the existence of stock indices futures
contract investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without
changing their portfolio composition Due to the low transaction cost involved
investors favor to use stock index futures as a hedging tool This has been proven by
the drastic growth in the futures contrac~ tra9ing volume over the few decades (Gosh bull ~~ middot~i middot
1993)
In order to be a good hedging tool hedgi~g effectiveness is one the important
criteria to measure the perfonnance of the futures contract It implies the accuracy of
the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Ther~for~pricing of the ~ 1 -
3
futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future contract The futures contracts should be priced under an
efficient mechanism to minimize the possibility of mispricing According to Merrick
(1988) misprJcing of futures contract has 3 implications on hedging First when there
is mispricing on the contract hedging will not be riskless if the hedger does not hold
the contract until its maturity date Under the efficient pricing mechanism the return
on a future~ash hedge will purely depend on the relative movement of the futures
price versus its spot price However the existence of mispricing will include a
stochastic component into the consideration Second if there is a correlation between
mispricing and futures return the hedge ratios calculated may not fulfill the variance
minimization rule Third mispricing also has impact on the cost of hedging In general
if the futures contract is overpriced in the first place a short term long cash hedge
gains more than its fair return On the contrary the gain will be lesser than fair returns
if the contract is underpriced
Despite futures contracts and its underlying are traded in different markets the
price movements in two markets have to be in line As the futures contract approaching
its maturity date its price shall gradually converge to its underlying spot price
prevailing in cash market The diffetence be~een the spot price of the underlying ~ bull ~ r-~ bull
bull ~ middot ~ ~ bull ~ t
instrument and price of the futures contract is known as basis It is the net cost of
carrying the futures contract to the maturity date For financial futures the financing
cost for the margin requirement is the primary component of the basis and equity
based futures will have to factor in the dividends receivabl~ by pn 9~er of physical ~t bull I
4
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
ABSTRAK
PELUANG ARBITRAJ DAN KECEKAPAN HARGA DI PASARAN KONTRAK NIAGA HADAPAN DI MALAYSIA - KONTRAK NIAGA HADAPAN INDEKS
SAHAM KUALA LUMPUR (FKLI) Oleh
Jason Jasmy Khong
Kontrak niaga hadapan adalah peIjanjian antara penjual dan pembeli sesuatu komoditi yang
menetapkan harga kuantiti dan kualiti komoditi tersebut dan masa bila urus niaga ini akan
berlaku Kontrak ini membawa kewajipan kepada kedua-dua pihak untuk menunaikan
syarat-syarat yang ditetapkan Salah satu kelebihan kontrak niaga hadapan adalah untuk
membekalkan peserta pasaran dengan alat perlindungan nilai yang dapat mengimbangi
risiko mereka dalam pasaran tunai Pengenalan kontrak niaga hadapan indeks saham
menyediakan altematif kepada pelabur untuk mengawal risiko pasaran dalam portfolio
mereka tanpa mengubah komposisi saham di dalam portfolio Keberkesanan lindung nitai
kontrak niaga hadapan bergantung kepada setakat mana kontrak itu dapat mencerminkan
pasaran asasnya dengan tepat Oleh sehab itu mekanisme harga kontrak niaga hadapan
yang cekap adalah penting untuk memastikan salah harga antara pasaran tunai dan pasaran
niaga hadapan adalah minimum Dengan itu akitiviti arbitraj memainkan peranan yang
penting untuk memastikan kedua-dua harga di pasaran tunai dan pasaran niaga hadapan I t ~ _ bullbull~ -~~
adalah sejajar Perdagangan arbitraj yang aktif dapat mem~t~1iarga kontralc-kontrak
niaga adalah betul dan adil supaya objektif-kecekapan harga akan dipenuhi Kajian ini akan
memberi tumpuan ke atas pemeriksaan perbezaan antara harga sebenar kontrak niaga
hadapan indeks saham Kuala Lumpur (FKLI)middot di pasaran deng~ harga yang sepatutnyavi I I f
tbullbull ~
apabila dinilai dengan menggunakan kaedah cost of carry Kajian ini juga menguji
kewujudan peluang arbitraj selepas mengambil pertimbangan tentang kos transaksi Di
samping itu kertas ini juga cuba untuk menentukan sarna ada kecekapan harga di pasaran niaga hadapln indeks saham di Malaysia telah meningkat sepanjang masa Keputusan
daripada kajian tersebut menunjukkan bahawa kejadian salah harga antara harga sebenar
dengan harga teori berlaku dengan kerap dan be~erusan Selepas mengambil pertimbangan
tentang kos urusniaga beberapa kejadian salah harga yang melebihi batasan tanpa arbitrage
~ masih dapat diperhatikan lni menunjukkan bahawa peluang arbitraj masih wujud untuk
pedagang yang menghadapi kos transaksi yang lebih rendah Dari segi kecekapan harga
pasaran niaga hadapan memperolehi prestasi yang lebih baik selepas krisis subprime 2008
ketika ekonomi sedang memasuki peringkat pemulihan
-shy middot - t ~middotmiddot middot middot ~middot middot r~=-~ bull-~
bull t
t
I bullbull Vll I (I bull tmiddot
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all I would like to express my deepest and most sincere gratitude to my project paper ~pervisor of the Faculty Economics and Business Assoc Prof Venus Liew
Khim Sen for continuously supporting me throughout the completion of project paper
period His patience and enthusiasm always motivafes me to write a good project paper In
addition his willingness to share his wide knowledge allows me to improve and gain more
knowledge each time we meet Without his guidance I would not able to complete my
project paper on time
Next I would like to thank my parents and family for giving me the encouragement
and financial support to pursue MBA With their support I am able to persevere and
eventually finish my project paper and coursework Finally I would like to thank all my
course mates for always being there and helping me whenever I faced with any obstacles or
difficulties in my study
shy
viii t I II
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARAWAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY III
ABSTRACT IV
ABSTRAK VI
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Vlll
LIST OF TABLES Xl
LIST OF FIGURES Xll
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Xlll
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction 1
12 Background of Study 6
13 Problem Statement 10
14 Research Question 11
15 Research Objectives 11
16 Significance of Study 12
17 Organization of Study 13
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
21 Introduction 14
22 The Stock Index Futures Pricing Model in a Perfect Market (No 16
Transaction Cost)
23 The Cost of Carry Model in an Imperfect Market bull - 21
231 Difficulty ofTrad~g th~ u~d~rrYimiddot~glnaex~ask~ ~i 4middot 22 bull
232 Regulatory Restrictions and Barriers -shy 24
233 Transaction Costs 28
234 Stochastic Interest Rate 33
235 Tax and Tax Timing Option 33
ix
i tt bull (0 II I
236 Dividend Misspecification 34
24 Market Efficiency and Relationship between Stock Futures Index 35
and Cash Price Index
CHAPTER ~ RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
31 Introduction 38
32 Data 38
33 Methodology 39
33 1 Arbitrage Opportunities under Cost of Carry Model 39
332 Constructing the Arbitrage-Free Boundary 42
333 Mispricing of FKLI Futures Contract in Malaysia Futures 45
Market
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
41 Arbitrage Opportunities Under Simple Cost of Carry Model 46
42 Arbitrage Opportunities after Transaction Costs 53
43 Pricing Efficiency in Malaysia Stocks Index Futures (FKLI) Market 56
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION
51 Introduction 61
52 Major Findings of Study 62
53 Implication and Recommendation of Study 63
REFERENCES 64
t~ i
_ ~
I X bull i i bull t shy
List of Tables Page
Table 11 Specifications of FKLI futures contract 8
Table 31 bommissions on Trading of Stocks and Futures Contracts 43
43
Table 41 Average monthly mispricing of the FKLI futures contracts 52
Table 42 Arbitrage Opportunities under Differe~t Level of Transaction 55
Costs
Table 43 Standard error between the actual closing price and 58
theoretical price
Table 44 Summary of regression analysis between actual and 60
theoretical price
Table 32 Total Transaction Costs Involved in Index Arbitrage
bull I
xi I I
List of Figures Page
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures 9
Contract Figure 41 Plots of Futures Premium from Jan 2001 to Dec 2010 50
Figure 42 Distribution of the FKLI contracts premium 51
Figure 43 Plots of standard error between the ackl futures price and 58
theoretical price
xii I i ~ bull t jj
I
List of Abbreviations
8MD Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad
FBMKLCI FTSE Bursa Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
FKLI FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI Futures
KLCI Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
KLOFFE Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financi~ Futures Exchange
MDEX Malaysian Derivatives Exchange Berhad
SampPSOO Standard and Poors 500 Index ~
SPDR Standard and Poors Depository Receipt
ETF Exchange Traded Fund
1 bull
xiii t J
~
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction
The finan~ial world has witnessed more and more attention in the area of
derivative financial instruments in the preceding years Derivatives have gained
reputation and popularity to become the proven form ~frisk management tools Amidst
the few derivatives instruments futures are among the measures that have been widely
used by corporations as a way of protection against unpredictable outcomes of the
markets Futures markets are derivatives markets that exist due to the existence of cash
market The futures markets plays a key role in managing risks related to the
adjustment in price volatility of some assets as well as to provide the opportunities for
speculators (Normas Izani Rasidah amp Saiful 2012)
Futures market was originated from commodities trading especially for
agricultural products A futures contract is defmed as the agreement between two
parties which are the seller and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sen a certain
product The contract states all the details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity
price and the delivery of the product on a predetermined date Both parties have the
responsibilities and obligations to carry outthe ~lt~~~1saction at the maturity date - middot ~ r- ~ t f gtlO p
Nowadays futures market is more popular and widely used in financial sector
- _
Various types of equity and financial derivatives are offered by the futures market in
order to facilitate the trading These derivative products have a wide coverage which
includes currency interbank offer rate government securities ~ock indices and etc ~ t ) -1
1
The futures market is mainly made up by 3 types of market players who are known as
hedgers speculators and arbitrageurs
Hedger is usually a real investor who has taken a position in cash market He uses
futures as insuQince to hedge his portfolio risk in order to minimize his loss if
something happen out of his expectation Hedging refers to a position established in
one market in an attempt to offset exposure to pri(4e fluctuations in the opposite
position in another market with the goal of minimizing ones exposure to unwanted
risk For example fund managers are perpetually with stocks in hand therefore their
risk exposure to the market would be enhanced in declining markets A fund manager
expects that in two months time the share prices will appreciate However he is
worried that unforeseen events may cause prices to decline prior to the time he would
sell his stocks He chooses to trade on BMD and hedges his position by selling the
forward FKLI contract In doing so he haS effectively agreed to lock-in his future
selling price today for a contract that will expire in two months time
Besides hedging FKLI is also used for arbitraging by arbitrageurs When
derivatives are trading above and below their theoretical fair value it is possible to
undertake arbitrage strategies by buying or selling the derivatives and simultaneously
selling or purchasing the underlying st~ks For example the fund manager realizes t- fi~ bull r-~ bull
bull If ~ i 1
that the correlation prices of the cash market and the FKLI market has deviated from bull
If
its usual spreads and that the FKLI is trading at a premium to the cash market
Arbitrage can take place by selling FKLI and buying the underlying shares in the
equity market The position will be liquidated later once the spread o(the prices it tmiddot
~
2
between both markets return to it fair value
However trading of futures contracts by speculators are just like a gambling
activity They are not planning to taking delivery but merely expecting to earn profit
from the differqtce of prices by buying the contract with lower price and selling it with
higher price (Chance amp Brooks 2010) They will observe the trading patterns and post
data on reactions to market announcements to make estimate on possible bullish or
bearish trends For example the fund manger expects a spike up in prices in
anticipation of an increase in buying activities by foreign funds based on the positive
economic data of the country It naturally will increase its exposure and may purchase
stocks and FKLJ simultaneously to maximize its buylong portfolio position
As mentioned earlier futures market is viewed as a hedging tool by the market
players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is adverse
price change in the market Prior to 198~ investors in stock market are having
difficulties in controlling their market risk With the existence of stock indices futures
contract investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without
changing their portfolio composition Due to the low transaction cost involved
investors favor to use stock index futures as a hedging tool This has been proven by
the drastic growth in the futures contrac~ tra9ing volume over the few decades (Gosh bull ~~ middot~i middot
1993)
In order to be a good hedging tool hedgi~g effectiveness is one the important
criteria to measure the perfonnance of the futures contract It implies the accuracy of
the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Ther~for~pricing of the ~ 1 -
3
futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future contract The futures contracts should be priced under an
efficient mechanism to minimize the possibility of mispricing According to Merrick
(1988) misprJcing of futures contract has 3 implications on hedging First when there
is mispricing on the contract hedging will not be riskless if the hedger does not hold
the contract until its maturity date Under the efficient pricing mechanism the return
on a future~ash hedge will purely depend on the relative movement of the futures
price versus its spot price However the existence of mispricing will include a
stochastic component into the consideration Second if there is a correlation between
mispricing and futures return the hedge ratios calculated may not fulfill the variance
minimization rule Third mispricing also has impact on the cost of hedging In general
if the futures contract is overpriced in the first place a short term long cash hedge
gains more than its fair return On the contrary the gain will be lesser than fair returns
if the contract is underpriced
Despite futures contracts and its underlying are traded in different markets the
price movements in two markets have to be in line As the futures contract approaching
its maturity date its price shall gradually converge to its underlying spot price
prevailing in cash market The diffetence be~een the spot price of the underlying ~ bull ~ r-~ bull
bull ~ middot ~ ~ bull ~ t
instrument and price of the futures contract is known as basis It is the net cost of
carrying the futures contract to the maturity date For financial futures the financing
cost for the margin requirement is the primary component of the basis and equity
based futures will have to factor in the dividends receivabl~ by pn 9~er of physical ~t bull I
4
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
apabila dinilai dengan menggunakan kaedah cost of carry Kajian ini juga menguji
kewujudan peluang arbitraj selepas mengambil pertimbangan tentang kos transaksi Di
samping itu kertas ini juga cuba untuk menentukan sarna ada kecekapan harga di pasaran niaga hadapln indeks saham di Malaysia telah meningkat sepanjang masa Keputusan
daripada kajian tersebut menunjukkan bahawa kejadian salah harga antara harga sebenar
dengan harga teori berlaku dengan kerap dan be~erusan Selepas mengambil pertimbangan
tentang kos urusniaga beberapa kejadian salah harga yang melebihi batasan tanpa arbitrage
~ masih dapat diperhatikan lni menunjukkan bahawa peluang arbitraj masih wujud untuk
pedagang yang menghadapi kos transaksi yang lebih rendah Dari segi kecekapan harga
pasaran niaga hadapan memperolehi prestasi yang lebih baik selepas krisis subprime 2008
ketika ekonomi sedang memasuki peringkat pemulihan
-shy middot - t ~middotmiddot middot middot ~middot middot r~=-~ bull-~
bull t
t
I bullbull Vll I (I bull tmiddot
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all I would like to express my deepest and most sincere gratitude to my project paper ~pervisor of the Faculty Economics and Business Assoc Prof Venus Liew
Khim Sen for continuously supporting me throughout the completion of project paper
period His patience and enthusiasm always motivafes me to write a good project paper In
addition his willingness to share his wide knowledge allows me to improve and gain more
knowledge each time we meet Without his guidance I would not able to complete my
project paper on time
Next I would like to thank my parents and family for giving me the encouragement
and financial support to pursue MBA With their support I am able to persevere and
eventually finish my project paper and coursework Finally I would like to thank all my
course mates for always being there and helping me whenever I faced with any obstacles or
difficulties in my study
shy
viii t I II
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARAWAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY III
ABSTRACT IV
ABSTRAK VI
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Vlll
LIST OF TABLES Xl
LIST OF FIGURES Xll
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Xlll
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction 1
12 Background of Study 6
13 Problem Statement 10
14 Research Question 11
15 Research Objectives 11
16 Significance of Study 12
17 Organization of Study 13
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
21 Introduction 14
22 The Stock Index Futures Pricing Model in a Perfect Market (No 16
Transaction Cost)
23 The Cost of Carry Model in an Imperfect Market bull - 21
231 Difficulty ofTrad~g th~ u~d~rrYimiddot~glnaex~ask~ ~i 4middot 22 bull
232 Regulatory Restrictions and Barriers -shy 24
233 Transaction Costs 28
234 Stochastic Interest Rate 33
235 Tax and Tax Timing Option 33
ix
i tt bull (0 II I
236 Dividend Misspecification 34
24 Market Efficiency and Relationship between Stock Futures Index 35
and Cash Price Index
CHAPTER ~ RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
31 Introduction 38
32 Data 38
33 Methodology 39
33 1 Arbitrage Opportunities under Cost of Carry Model 39
332 Constructing the Arbitrage-Free Boundary 42
333 Mispricing of FKLI Futures Contract in Malaysia Futures 45
Market
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
41 Arbitrage Opportunities Under Simple Cost of Carry Model 46
42 Arbitrage Opportunities after Transaction Costs 53
43 Pricing Efficiency in Malaysia Stocks Index Futures (FKLI) Market 56
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION
51 Introduction 61
52 Major Findings of Study 62
53 Implication and Recommendation of Study 63
REFERENCES 64
t~ i
_ ~
I X bull i i bull t shy
List of Tables Page
Table 11 Specifications of FKLI futures contract 8
Table 31 bommissions on Trading of Stocks and Futures Contracts 43
43
Table 41 Average monthly mispricing of the FKLI futures contracts 52
Table 42 Arbitrage Opportunities under Differe~t Level of Transaction 55
Costs
Table 43 Standard error between the actual closing price and 58
theoretical price
Table 44 Summary of regression analysis between actual and 60
theoretical price
Table 32 Total Transaction Costs Involved in Index Arbitrage
bull I
xi I I
List of Figures Page
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures 9
Contract Figure 41 Plots of Futures Premium from Jan 2001 to Dec 2010 50
Figure 42 Distribution of the FKLI contracts premium 51
Figure 43 Plots of standard error between the ackl futures price and 58
theoretical price
xii I i ~ bull t jj
I
List of Abbreviations
8MD Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad
FBMKLCI FTSE Bursa Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
FKLI FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI Futures
KLCI Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
KLOFFE Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financi~ Futures Exchange
MDEX Malaysian Derivatives Exchange Berhad
SampPSOO Standard and Poors 500 Index ~
SPDR Standard and Poors Depository Receipt
ETF Exchange Traded Fund
1 bull
xiii t J
~
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction
The finan~ial world has witnessed more and more attention in the area of
derivative financial instruments in the preceding years Derivatives have gained
reputation and popularity to become the proven form ~frisk management tools Amidst
the few derivatives instruments futures are among the measures that have been widely
used by corporations as a way of protection against unpredictable outcomes of the
markets Futures markets are derivatives markets that exist due to the existence of cash
market The futures markets plays a key role in managing risks related to the
adjustment in price volatility of some assets as well as to provide the opportunities for
speculators (Normas Izani Rasidah amp Saiful 2012)
Futures market was originated from commodities trading especially for
agricultural products A futures contract is defmed as the agreement between two
parties which are the seller and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sen a certain
product The contract states all the details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity
price and the delivery of the product on a predetermined date Both parties have the
responsibilities and obligations to carry outthe ~lt~~~1saction at the maturity date - middot ~ r- ~ t f gtlO p
Nowadays futures market is more popular and widely used in financial sector
- _
Various types of equity and financial derivatives are offered by the futures market in
order to facilitate the trading These derivative products have a wide coverage which
includes currency interbank offer rate government securities ~ock indices and etc ~ t ) -1
1
The futures market is mainly made up by 3 types of market players who are known as
hedgers speculators and arbitrageurs
Hedger is usually a real investor who has taken a position in cash market He uses
futures as insuQince to hedge his portfolio risk in order to minimize his loss if
something happen out of his expectation Hedging refers to a position established in
one market in an attempt to offset exposure to pri(4e fluctuations in the opposite
position in another market with the goal of minimizing ones exposure to unwanted
risk For example fund managers are perpetually with stocks in hand therefore their
risk exposure to the market would be enhanced in declining markets A fund manager
expects that in two months time the share prices will appreciate However he is
worried that unforeseen events may cause prices to decline prior to the time he would
sell his stocks He chooses to trade on BMD and hedges his position by selling the
forward FKLI contract In doing so he haS effectively agreed to lock-in his future
selling price today for a contract that will expire in two months time
Besides hedging FKLI is also used for arbitraging by arbitrageurs When
derivatives are trading above and below their theoretical fair value it is possible to
undertake arbitrage strategies by buying or selling the derivatives and simultaneously
selling or purchasing the underlying st~ks For example the fund manager realizes t- fi~ bull r-~ bull
bull If ~ i 1
that the correlation prices of the cash market and the FKLI market has deviated from bull
If
its usual spreads and that the FKLI is trading at a premium to the cash market
Arbitrage can take place by selling FKLI and buying the underlying shares in the
equity market The position will be liquidated later once the spread o(the prices it tmiddot
~
2
between both markets return to it fair value
However trading of futures contracts by speculators are just like a gambling
activity They are not planning to taking delivery but merely expecting to earn profit
from the differqtce of prices by buying the contract with lower price and selling it with
higher price (Chance amp Brooks 2010) They will observe the trading patterns and post
data on reactions to market announcements to make estimate on possible bullish or
bearish trends For example the fund manger expects a spike up in prices in
anticipation of an increase in buying activities by foreign funds based on the positive
economic data of the country It naturally will increase its exposure and may purchase
stocks and FKLJ simultaneously to maximize its buylong portfolio position
As mentioned earlier futures market is viewed as a hedging tool by the market
players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is adverse
price change in the market Prior to 198~ investors in stock market are having
difficulties in controlling their market risk With the existence of stock indices futures
contract investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without
changing their portfolio composition Due to the low transaction cost involved
investors favor to use stock index futures as a hedging tool This has been proven by
the drastic growth in the futures contrac~ tra9ing volume over the few decades (Gosh bull ~~ middot~i middot
1993)
In order to be a good hedging tool hedgi~g effectiveness is one the important
criteria to measure the perfonnance of the futures contract It implies the accuracy of
the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Ther~for~pricing of the ~ 1 -
3
futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future contract The futures contracts should be priced under an
efficient mechanism to minimize the possibility of mispricing According to Merrick
(1988) misprJcing of futures contract has 3 implications on hedging First when there
is mispricing on the contract hedging will not be riskless if the hedger does not hold
the contract until its maturity date Under the efficient pricing mechanism the return
on a future~ash hedge will purely depend on the relative movement of the futures
price versus its spot price However the existence of mispricing will include a
stochastic component into the consideration Second if there is a correlation between
mispricing and futures return the hedge ratios calculated may not fulfill the variance
minimization rule Third mispricing also has impact on the cost of hedging In general
if the futures contract is overpriced in the first place a short term long cash hedge
gains more than its fair return On the contrary the gain will be lesser than fair returns
if the contract is underpriced
Despite futures contracts and its underlying are traded in different markets the
price movements in two markets have to be in line As the futures contract approaching
its maturity date its price shall gradually converge to its underlying spot price
prevailing in cash market The diffetence be~een the spot price of the underlying ~ bull ~ r-~ bull
bull ~ middot ~ ~ bull ~ t
instrument and price of the futures contract is known as basis It is the net cost of
carrying the futures contract to the maturity date For financial futures the financing
cost for the margin requirement is the primary component of the basis and equity
based futures will have to factor in the dividends receivabl~ by pn 9~er of physical ~t bull I
4
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all I would like to express my deepest and most sincere gratitude to my project paper ~pervisor of the Faculty Economics and Business Assoc Prof Venus Liew
Khim Sen for continuously supporting me throughout the completion of project paper
period His patience and enthusiasm always motivafes me to write a good project paper In
addition his willingness to share his wide knowledge allows me to improve and gain more
knowledge each time we meet Without his guidance I would not able to complete my
project paper on time
Next I would like to thank my parents and family for giving me the encouragement
and financial support to pursue MBA With their support I am able to persevere and
eventually finish my project paper and coursework Finally I would like to thank all my
course mates for always being there and helping me whenever I faced with any obstacles or
difficulties in my study
shy
viii t I II
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARAWAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY III
ABSTRACT IV
ABSTRAK VI
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Vlll
LIST OF TABLES Xl
LIST OF FIGURES Xll
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Xlll
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction 1
12 Background of Study 6
13 Problem Statement 10
14 Research Question 11
15 Research Objectives 11
16 Significance of Study 12
17 Organization of Study 13
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
21 Introduction 14
22 The Stock Index Futures Pricing Model in a Perfect Market (No 16
Transaction Cost)
23 The Cost of Carry Model in an Imperfect Market bull - 21
231 Difficulty ofTrad~g th~ u~d~rrYimiddot~glnaex~ask~ ~i 4middot 22 bull
232 Regulatory Restrictions and Barriers -shy 24
233 Transaction Costs 28
234 Stochastic Interest Rate 33
235 Tax and Tax Timing Option 33
ix
i tt bull (0 II I
236 Dividend Misspecification 34
24 Market Efficiency and Relationship between Stock Futures Index 35
and Cash Price Index
CHAPTER ~ RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
31 Introduction 38
32 Data 38
33 Methodology 39
33 1 Arbitrage Opportunities under Cost of Carry Model 39
332 Constructing the Arbitrage-Free Boundary 42
333 Mispricing of FKLI Futures Contract in Malaysia Futures 45
Market
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
41 Arbitrage Opportunities Under Simple Cost of Carry Model 46
42 Arbitrage Opportunities after Transaction Costs 53
43 Pricing Efficiency in Malaysia Stocks Index Futures (FKLI) Market 56
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION
51 Introduction 61
52 Major Findings of Study 62
53 Implication and Recommendation of Study 63
REFERENCES 64
t~ i
_ ~
I X bull i i bull t shy
List of Tables Page
Table 11 Specifications of FKLI futures contract 8
Table 31 bommissions on Trading of Stocks and Futures Contracts 43
43
Table 41 Average monthly mispricing of the FKLI futures contracts 52
Table 42 Arbitrage Opportunities under Differe~t Level of Transaction 55
Costs
Table 43 Standard error between the actual closing price and 58
theoretical price
Table 44 Summary of regression analysis between actual and 60
theoretical price
Table 32 Total Transaction Costs Involved in Index Arbitrage
bull I
xi I I
List of Figures Page
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures 9
Contract Figure 41 Plots of Futures Premium from Jan 2001 to Dec 2010 50
Figure 42 Distribution of the FKLI contracts premium 51
Figure 43 Plots of standard error between the ackl futures price and 58
theoretical price
xii I i ~ bull t jj
I
List of Abbreviations
8MD Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad
FBMKLCI FTSE Bursa Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
FKLI FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI Futures
KLCI Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
KLOFFE Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financi~ Futures Exchange
MDEX Malaysian Derivatives Exchange Berhad
SampPSOO Standard and Poors 500 Index ~
SPDR Standard and Poors Depository Receipt
ETF Exchange Traded Fund
1 bull
xiii t J
~
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction
The finan~ial world has witnessed more and more attention in the area of
derivative financial instruments in the preceding years Derivatives have gained
reputation and popularity to become the proven form ~frisk management tools Amidst
the few derivatives instruments futures are among the measures that have been widely
used by corporations as a way of protection against unpredictable outcomes of the
markets Futures markets are derivatives markets that exist due to the existence of cash
market The futures markets plays a key role in managing risks related to the
adjustment in price volatility of some assets as well as to provide the opportunities for
speculators (Normas Izani Rasidah amp Saiful 2012)
Futures market was originated from commodities trading especially for
agricultural products A futures contract is defmed as the agreement between two
parties which are the seller and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sen a certain
product The contract states all the details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity
price and the delivery of the product on a predetermined date Both parties have the
responsibilities and obligations to carry outthe ~lt~~~1saction at the maturity date - middot ~ r- ~ t f gtlO p
Nowadays futures market is more popular and widely used in financial sector
- _
Various types of equity and financial derivatives are offered by the futures market in
order to facilitate the trading These derivative products have a wide coverage which
includes currency interbank offer rate government securities ~ock indices and etc ~ t ) -1
1
The futures market is mainly made up by 3 types of market players who are known as
hedgers speculators and arbitrageurs
Hedger is usually a real investor who has taken a position in cash market He uses
futures as insuQince to hedge his portfolio risk in order to minimize his loss if
something happen out of his expectation Hedging refers to a position established in
one market in an attempt to offset exposure to pri(4e fluctuations in the opposite
position in another market with the goal of minimizing ones exposure to unwanted
risk For example fund managers are perpetually with stocks in hand therefore their
risk exposure to the market would be enhanced in declining markets A fund manager
expects that in two months time the share prices will appreciate However he is
worried that unforeseen events may cause prices to decline prior to the time he would
sell his stocks He chooses to trade on BMD and hedges his position by selling the
forward FKLI contract In doing so he haS effectively agreed to lock-in his future
selling price today for a contract that will expire in two months time
Besides hedging FKLI is also used for arbitraging by arbitrageurs When
derivatives are trading above and below their theoretical fair value it is possible to
undertake arbitrage strategies by buying or selling the derivatives and simultaneously
selling or purchasing the underlying st~ks For example the fund manager realizes t- fi~ bull r-~ bull
bull If ~ i 1
that the correlation prices of the cash market and the FKLI market has deviated from bull
If
its usual spreads and that the FKLI is trading at a premium to the cash market
Arbitrage can take place by selling FKLI and buying the underlying shares in the
equity market The position will be liquidated later once the spread o(the prices it tmiddot
~
2
between both markets return to it fair value
However trading of futures contracts by speculators are just like a gambling
activity They are not planning to taking delivery but merely expecting to earn profit
from the differqtce of prices by buying the contract with lower price and selling it with
higher price (Chance amp Brooks 2010) They will observe the trading patterns and post
data on reactions to market announcements to make estimate on possible bullish or
bearish trends For example the fund manger expects a spike up in prices in
anticipation of an increase in buying activities by foreign funds based on the positive
economic data of the country It naturally will increase its exposure and may purchase
stocks and FKLJ simultaneously to maximize its buylong portfolio position
As mentioned earlier futures market is viewed as a hedging tool by the market
players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is adverse
price change in the market Prior to 198~ investors in stock market are having
difficulties in controlling their market risk With the existence of stock indices futures
contract investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without
changing their portfolio composition Due to the low transaction cost involved
investors favor to use stock index futures as a hedging tool This has been proven by
the drastic growth in the futures contrac~ tra9ing volume over the few decades (Gosh bull ~~ middot~i middot
1993)
In order to be a good hedging tool hedgi~g effectiveness is one the important
criteria to measure the perfonnance of the futures contract It implies the accuracy of
the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Ther~for~pricing of the ~ 1 -
3
futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future contract The futures contracts should be priced under an
efficient mechanism to minimize the possibility of mispricing According to Merrick
(1988) misprJcing of futures contract has 3 implications on hedging First when there
is mispricing on the contract hedging will not be riskless if the hedger does not hold
the contract until its maturity date Under the efficient pricing mechanism the return
on a future~ash hedge will purely depend on the relative movement of the futures
price versus its spot price However the existence of mispricing will include a
stochastic component into the consideration Second if there is a correlation between
mispricing and futures return the hedge ratios calculated may not fulfill the variance
minimization rule Third mispricing also has impact on the cost of hedging In general
if the futures contract is overpriced in the first place a short term long cash hedge
gains more than its fair return On the contrary the gain will be lesser than fair returns
if the contract is underpriced
Despite futures contracts and its underlying are traded in different markets the
price movements in two markets have to be in line As the futures contract approaching
its maturity date its price shall gradually converge to its underlying spot price
prevailing in cash market The diffetence be~een the spot price of the underlying ~ bull ~ r-~ bull
bull ~ middot ~ ~ bull ~ t
instrument and price of the futures contract is known as basis It is the net cost of
carrying the futures contract to the maturity date For financial futures the financing
cost for the margin requirement is the primary component of the basis and equity
based futures will have to factor in the dividends receivabl~ by pn 9~er of physical ~t bull I
4
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARAWAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY III
ABSTRACT IV
ABSTRAK VI
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Vlll
LIST OF TABLES Xl
LIST OF FIGURES Xll
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Xlll
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction 1
12 Background of Study 6
13 Problem Statement 10
14 Research Question 11
15 Research Objectives 11
16 Significance of Study 12
17 Organization of Study 13
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
21 Introduction 14
22 The Stock Index Futures Pricing Model in a Perfect Market (No 16
Transaction Cost)
23 The Cost of Carry Model in an Imperfect Market bull - 21
231 Difficulty ofTrad~g th~ u~d~rrYimiddot~glnaex~ask~ ~i 4middot 22 bull
232 Regulatory Restrictions and Barriers -shy 24
233 Transaction Costs 28
234 Stochastic Interest Rate 33
235 Tax and Tax Timing Option 33
ix
i tt bull (0 II I
236 Dividend Misspecification 34
24 Market Efficiency and Relationship between Stock Futures Index 35
and Cash Price Index
CHAPTER ~ RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
31 Introduction 38
32 Data 38
33 Methodology 39
33 1 Arbitrage Opportunities under Cost of Carry Model 39
332 Constructing the Arbitrage-Free Boundary 42
333 Mispricing of FKLI Futures Contract in Malaysia Futures 45
Market
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
41 Arbitrage Opportunities Under Simple Cost of Carry Model 46
42 Arbitrage Opportunities after Transaction Costs 53
43 Pricing Efficiency in Malaysia Stocks Index Futures (FKLI) Market 56
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION
51 Introduction 61
52 Major Findings of Study 62
53 Implication and Recommendation of Study 63
REFERENCES 64
t~ i
_ ~
I X bull i i bull t shy
List of Tables Page
Table 11 Specifications of FKLI futures contract 8
Table 31 bommissions on Trading of Stocks and Futures Contracts 43
43
Table 41 Average monthly mispricing of the FKLI futures contracts 52
Table 42 Arbitrage Opportunities under Differe~t Level of Transaction 55
Costs
Table 43 Standard error between the actual closing price and 58
theoretical price
Table 44 Summary of regression analysis between actual and 60
theoretical price
Table 32 Total Transaction Costs Involved in Index Arbitrage
bull I
xi I I
List of Figures Page
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures 9
Contract Figure 41 Plots of Futures Premium from Jan 2001 to Dec 2010 50
Figure 42 Distribution of the FKLI contracts premium 51
Figure 43 Plots of standard error between the ackl futures price and 58
theoretical price
xii I i ~ bull t jj
I
List of Abbreviations
8MD Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad
FBMKLCI FTSE Bursa Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
FKLI FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI Futures
KLCI Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
KLOFFE Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financi~ Futures Exchange
MDEX Malaysian Derivatives Exchange Berhad
SampPSOO Standard and Poors 500 Index ~
SPDR Standard and Poors Depository Receipt
ETF Exchange Traded Fund
1 bull
xiii t J
~
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction
The finan~ial world has witnessed more and more attention in the area of
derivative financial instruments in the preceding years Derivatives have gained
reputation and popularity to become the proven form ~frisk management tools Amidst
the few derivatives instruments futures are among the measures that have been widely
used by corporations as a way of protection against unpredictable outcomes of the
markets Futures markets are derivatives markets that exist due to the existence of cash
market The futures markets plays a key role in managing risks related to the
adjustment in price volatility of some assets as well as to provide the opportunities for
speculators (Normas Izani Rasidah amp Saiful 2012)
Futures market was originated from commodities trading especially for
agricultural products A futures contract is defmed as the agreement between two
parties which are the seller and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sen a certain
product The contract states all the details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity
price and the delivery of the product on a predetermined date Both parties have the
responsibilities and obligations to carry outthe ~lt~~~1saction at the maturity date - middot ~ r- ~ t f gtlO p
Nowadays futures market is more popular and widely used in financial sector
- _
Various types of equity and financial derivatives are offered by the futures market in
order to facilitate the trading These derivative products have a wide coverage which
includes currency interbank offer rate government securities ~ock indices and etc ~ t ) -1
1
The futures market is mainly made up by 3 types of market players who are known as
hedgers speculators and arbitrageurs
Hedger is usually a real investor who has taken a position in cash market He uses
futures as insuQince to hedge his portfolio risk in order to minimize his loss if
something happen out of his expectation Hedging refers to a position established in
one market in an attempt to offset exposure to pri(4e fluctuations in the opposite
position in another market with the goal of minimizing ones exposure to unwanted
risk For example fund managers are perpetually with stocks in hand therefore their
risk exposure to the market would be enhanced in declining markets A fund manager
expects that in two months time the share prices will appreciate However he is
worried that unforeseen events may cause prices to decline prior to the time he would
sell his stocks He chooses to trade on BMD and hedges his position by selling the
forward FKLI contract In doing so he haS effectively agreed to lock-in his future
selling price today for a contract that will expire in two months time
Besides hedging FKLI is also used for arbitraging by arbitrageurs When
derivatives are trading above and below their theoretical fair value it is possible to
undertake arbitrage strategies by buying or selling the derivatives and simultaneously
selling or purchasing the underlying st~ks For example the fund manager realizes t- fi~ bull r-~ bull
bull If ~ i 1
that the correlation prices of the cash market and the FKLI market has deviated from bull
If
its usual spreads and that the FKLI is trading at a premium to the cash market
Arbitrage can take place by selling FKLI and buying the underlying shares in the
equity market The position will be liquidated later once the spread o(the prices it tmiddot
~
2
between both markets return to it fair value
However trading of futures contracts by speculators are just like a gambling
activity They are not planning to taking delivery but merely expecting to earn profit
from the differqtce of prices by buying the contract with lower price and selling it with
higher price (Chance amp Brooks 2010) They will observe the trading patterns and post
data on reactions to market announcements to make estimate on possible bullish or
bearish trends For example the fund manger expects a spike up in prices in
anticipation of an increase in buying activities by foreign funds based on the positive
economic data of the country It naturally will increase its exposure and may purchase
stocks and FKLJ simultaneously to maximize its buylong portfolio position
As mentioned earlier futures market is viewed as a hedging tool by the market
players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is adverse
price change in the market Prior to 198~ investors in stock market are having
difficulties in controlling their market risk With the existence of stock indices futures
contract investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without
changing their portfolio composition Due to the low transaction cost involved
investors favor to use stock index futures as a hedging tool This has been proven by
the drastic growth in the futures contrac~ tra9ing volume over the few decades (Gosh bull ~~ middot~i middot
1993)
In order to be a good hedging tool hedgi~g effectiveness is one the important
criteria to measure the perfonnance of the futures contract It implies the accuracy of
the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Ther~for~pricing of the ~ 1 -
3
futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future contract The futures contracts should be priced under an
efficient mechanism to minimize the possibility of mispricing According to Merrick
(1988) misprJcing of futures contract has 3 implications on hedging First when there
is mispricing on the contract hedging will not be riskless if the hedger does not hold
the contract until its maturity date Under the efficient pricing mechanism the return
on a future~ash hedge will purely depend on the relative movement of the futures
price versus its spot price However the existence of mispricing will include a
stochastic component into the consideration Second if there is a correlation between
mispricing and futures return the hedge ratios calculated may not fulfill the variance
minimization rule Third mispricing also has impact on the cost of hedging In general
if the futures contract is overpriced in the first place a short term long cash hedge
gains more than its fair return On the contrary the gain will be lesser than fair returns
if the contract is underpriced
Despite futures contracts and its underlying are traded in different markets the
price movements in two markets have to be in line As the futures contract approaching
its maturity date its price shall gradually converge to its underlying spot price
prevailing in cash market The diffetence be~een the spot price of the underlying ~ bull ~ r-~ bull
bull ~ middot ~ ~ bull ~ t
instrument and price of the futures contract is known as basis It is the net cost of
carrying the futures contract to the maturity date For financial futures the financing
cost for the margin requirement is the primary component of the basis and equity
based futures will have to factor in the dividends receivabl~ by pn 9~er of physical ~t bull I
4
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
236 Dividend Misspecification 34
24 Market Efficiency and Relationship between Stock Futures Index 35
and Cash Price Index
CHAPTER ~ RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
31 Introduction 38
32 Data 38
33 Methodology 39
33 1 Arbitrage Opportunities under Cost of Carry Model 39
332 Constructing the Arbitrage-Free Boundary 42
333 Mispricing of FKLI Futures Contract in Malaysia Futures 45
Market
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
41 Arbitrage Opportunities Under Simple Cost of Carry Model 46
42 Arbitrage Opportunities after Transaction Costs 53
43 Pricing Efficiency in Malaysia Stocks Index Futures (FKLI) Market 56
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION
51 Introduction 61
52 Major Findings of Study 62
53 Implication and Recommendation of Study 63
REFERENCES 64
t~ i
_ ~
I X bull i i bull t shy
List of Tables Page
Table 11 Specifications of FKLI futures contract 8
Table 31 bommissions on Trading of Stocks and Futures Contracts 43
43
Table 41 Average monthly mispricing of the FKLI futures contracts 52
Table 42 Arbitrage Opportunities under Differe~t Level of Transaction 55
Costs
Table 43 Standard error between the actual closing price and 58
theoretical price
Table 44 Summary of regression analysis between actual and 60
theoretical price
Table 32 Total Transaction Costs Involved in Index Arbitrage
bull I
xi I I
List of Figures Page
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures 9
Contract Figure 41 Plots of Futures Premium from Jan 2001 to Dec 2010 50
Figure 42 Distribution of the FKLI contracts premium 51
Figure 43 Plots of standard error between the ackl futures price and 58
theoretical price
xii I i ~ bull t jj
I
List of Abbreviations
8MD Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad
FBMKLCI FTSE Bursa Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
FKLI FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI Futures
KLCI Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
KLOFFE Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financi~ Futures Exchange
MDEX Malaysian Derivatives Exchange Berhad
SampPSOO Standard and Poors 500 Index ~
SPDR Standard and Poors Depository Receipt
ETF Exchange Traded Fund
1 bull
xiii t J
~
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction
The finan~ial world has witnessed more and more attention in the area of
derivative financial instruments in the preceding years Derivatives have gained
reputation and popularity to become the proven form ~frisk management tools Amidst
the few derivatives instruments futures are among the measures that have been widely
used by corporations as a way of protection against unpredictable outcomes of the
markets Futures markets are derivatives markets that exist due to the existence of cash
market The futures markets plays a key role in managing risks related to the
adjustment in price volatility of some assets as well as to provide the opportunities for
speculators (Normas Izani Rasidah amp Saiful 2012)
Futures market was originated from commodities trading especially for
agricultural products A futures contract is defmed as the agreement between two
parties which are the seller and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sen a certain
product The contract states all the details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity
price and the delivery of the product on a predetermined date Both parties have the
responsibilities and obligations to carry outthe ~lt~~~1saction at the maturity date - middot ~ r- ~ t f gtlO p
Nowadays futures market is more popular and widely used in financial sector
- _
Various types of equity and financial derivatives are offered by the futures market in
order to facilitate the trading These derivative products have a wide coverage which
includes currency interbank offer rate government securities ~ock indices and etc ~ t ) -1
1
The futures market is mainly made up by 3 types of market players who are known as
hedgers speculators and arbitrageurs
Hedger is usually a real investor who has taken a position in cash market He uses
futures as insuQince to hedge his portfolio risk in order to minimize his loss if
something happen out of his expectation Hedging refers to a position established in
one market in an attempt to offset exposure to pri(4e fluctuations in the opposite
position in another market with the goal of minimizing ones exposure to unwanted
risk For example fund managers are perpetually with stocks in hand therefore their
risk exposure to the market would be enhanced in declining markets A fund manager
expects that in two months time the share prices will appreciate However he is
worried that unforeseen events may cause prices to decline prior to the time he would
sell his stocks He chooses to trade on BMD and hedges his position by selling the
forward FKLI contract In doing so he haS effectively agreed to lock-in his future
selling price today for a contract that will expire in two months time
Besides hedging FKLI is also used for arbitraging by arbitrageurs When
derivatives are trading above and below their theoretical fair value it is possible to
undertake arbitrage strategies by buying or selling the derivatives and simultaneously
selling or purchasing the underlying st~ks For example the fund manager realizes t- fi~ bull r-~ bull
bull If ~ i 1
that the correlation prices of the cash market and the FKLI market has deviated from bull
If
its usual spreads and that the FKLI is trading at a premium to the cash market
Arbitrage can take place by selling FKLI and buying the underlying shares in the
equity market The position will be liquidated later once the spread o(the prices it tmiddot
~
2
between both markets return to it fair value
However trading of futures contracts by speculators are just like a gambling
activity They are not planning to taking delivery but merely expecting to earn profit
from the differqtce of prices by buying the contract with lower price and selling it with
higher price (Chance amp Brooks 2010) They will observe the trading patterns and post
data on reactions to market announcements to make estimate on possible bullish or
bearish trends For example the fund manger expects a spike up in prices in
anticipation of an increase in buying activities by foreign funds based on the positive
economic data of the country It naturally will increase its exposure and may purchase
stocks and FKLJ simultaneously to maximize its buylong portfolio position
As mentioned earlier futures market is viewed as a hedging tool by the market
players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is adverse
price change in the market Prior to 198~ investors in stock market are having
difficulties in controlling their market risk With the existence of stock indices futures
contract investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without
changing their portfolio composition Due to the low transaction cost involved
investors favor to use stock index futures as a hedging tool This has been proven by
the drastic growth in the futures contrac~ tra9ing volume over the few decades (Gosh bull ~~ middot~i middot
1993)
In order to be a good hedging tool hedgi~g effectiveness is one the important
criteria to measure the perfonnance of the futures contract It implies the accuracy of
the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Ther~for~pricing of the ~ 1 -
3
futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future contract The futures contracts should be priced under an
efficient mechanism to minimize the possibility of mispricing According to Merrick
(1988) misprJcing of futures contract has 3 implications on hedging First when there
is mispricing on the contract hedging will not be riskless if the hedger does not hold
the contract until its maturity date Under the efficient pricing mechanism the return
on a future~ash hedge will purely depend on the relative movement of the futures
price versus its spot price However the existence of mispricing will include a
stochastic component into the consideration Second if there is a correlation between
mispricing and futures return the hedge ratios calculated may not fulfill the variance
minimization rule Third mispricing also has impact on the cost of hedging In general
if the futures contract is overpriced in the first place a short term long cash hedge
gains more than its fair return On the contrary the gain will be lesser than fair returns
if the contract is underpriced
Despite futures contracts and its underlying are traded in different markets the
price movements in two markets have to be in line As the futures contract approaching
its maturity date its price shall gradually converge to its underlying spot price
prevailing in cash market The diffetence be~een the spot price of the underlying ~ bull ~ r-~ bull
bull ~ middot ~ ~ bull ~ t
instrument and price of the futures contract is known as basis It is the net cost of
carrying the futures contract to the maturity date For financial futures the financing
cost for the margin requirement is the primary component of the basis and equity
based futures will have to factor in the dividends receivabl~ by pn 9~er of physical ~t bull I
4
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
List of Tables Page
Table 11 Specifications of FKLI futures contract 8
Table 31 bommissions on Trading of Stocks and Futures Contracts 43
43
Table 41 Average monthly mispricing of the FKLI futures contracts 52
Table 42 Arbitrage Opportunities under Differe~t Level of Transaction 55
Costs
Table 43 Standard error between the actual closing price and 58
theoretical price
Table 44 Summary of regression analysis between actual and 60
theoretical price
Table 32 Total Transaction Costs Involved in Index Arbitrage
bull I
xi I I
List of Figures Page
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures 9
Contract Figure 41 Plots of Futures Premium from Jan 2001 to Dec 2010 50
Figure 42 Distribution of the FKLI contracts premium 51
Figure 43 Plots of standard error between the ackl futures price and 58
theoretical price
xii I i ~ bull t jj
I
List of Abbreviations
8MD Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad
FBMKLCI FTSE Bursa Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
FKLI FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI Futures
KLCI Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
KLOFFE Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financi~ Futures Exchange
MDEX Malaysian Derivatives Exchange Berhad
SampPSOO Standard and Poors 500 Index ~
SPDR Standard and Poors Depository Receipt
ETF Exchange Traded Fund
1 bull
xiii t J
~
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction
The finan~ial world has witnessed more and more attention in the area of
derivative financial instruments in the preceding years Derivatives have gained
reputation and popularity to become the proven form ~frisk management tools Amidst
the few derivatives instruments futures are among the measures that have been widely
used by corporations as a way of protection against unpredictable outcomes of the
markets Futures markets are derivatives markets that exist due to the existence of cash
market The futures markets plays a key role in managing risks related to the
adjustment in price volatility of some assets as well as to provide the opportunities for
speculators (Normas Izani Rasidah amp Saiful 2012)
Futures market was originated from commodities trading especially for
agricultural products A futures contract is defmed as the agreement between two
parties which are the seller and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sen a certain
product The contract states all the details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity
price and the delivery of the product on a predetermined date Both parties have the
responsibilities and obligations to carry outthe ~lt~~~1saction at the maturity date - middot ~ r- ~ t f gtlO p
Nowadays futures market is more popular and widely used in financial sector
- _
Various types of equity and financial derivatives are offered by the futures market in
order to facilitate the trading These derivative products have a wide coverage which
includes currency interbank offer rate government securities ~ock indices and etc ~ t ) -1
1
The futures market is mainly made up by 3 types of market players who are known as
hedgers speculators and arbitrageurs
Hedger is usually a real investor who has taken a position in cash market He uses
futures as insuQince to hedge his portfolio risk in order to minimize his loss if
something happen out of his expectation Hedging refers to a position established in
one market in an attempt to offset exposure to pri(4e fluctuations in the opposite
position in another market with the goal of minimizing ones exposure to unwanted
risk For example fund managers are perpetually with stocks in hand therefore their
risk exposure to the market would be enhanced in declining markets A fund manager
expects that in two months time the share prices will appreciate However he is
worried that unforeseen events may cause prices to decline prior to the time he would
sell his stocks He chooses to trade on BMD and hedges his position by selling the
forward FKLI contract In doing so he haS effectively agreed to lock-in his future
selling price today for a contract that will expire in two months time
Besides hedging FKLI is also used for arbitraging by arbitrageurs When
derivatives are trading above and below their theoretical fair value it is possible to
undertake arbitrage strategies by buying or selling the derivatives and simultaneously
selling or purchasing the underlying st~ks For example the fund manager realizes t- fi~ bull r-~ bull
bull If ~ i 1
that the correlation prices of the cash market and the FKLI market has deviated from bull
If
its usual spreads and that the FKLI is trading at a premium to the cash market
Arbitrage can take place by selling FKLI and buying the underlying shares in the
equity market The position will be liquidated later once the spread o(the prices it tmiddot
~
2
between both markets return to it fair value
However trading of futures contracts by speculators are just like a gambling
activity They are not planning to taking delivery but merely expecting to earn profit
from the differqtce of prices by buying the contract with lower price and selling it with
higher price (Chance amp Brooks 2010) They will observe the trading patterns and post
data on reactions to market announcements to make estimate on possible bullish or
bearish trends For example the fund manger expects a spike up in prices in
anticipation of an increase in buying activities by foreign funds based on the positive
economic data of the country It naturally will increase its exposure and may purchase
stocks and FKLJ simultaneously to maximize its buylong portfolio position
As mentioned earlier futures market is viewed as a hedging tool by the market
players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is adverse
price change in the market Prior to 198~ investors in stock market are having
difficulties in controlling their market risk With the existence of stock indices futures
contract investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without
changing their portfolio composition Due to the low transaction cost involved
investors favor to use stock index futures as a hedging tool This has been proven by
the drastic growth in the futures contrac~ tra9ing volume over the few decades (Gosh bull ~~ middot~i middot
1993)
In order to be a good hedging tool hedgi~g effectiveness is one the important
criteria to measure the perfonnance of the futures contract It implies the accuracy of
the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Ther~for~pricing of the ~ 1 -
3
futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future contract The futures contracts should be priced under an
efficient mechanism to minimize the possibility of mispricing According to Merrick
(1988) misprJcing of futures contract has 3 implications on hedging First when there
is mispricing on the contract hedging will not be riskless if the hedger does not hold
the contract until its maturity date Under the efficient pricing mechanism the return
on a future~ash hedge will purely depend on the relative movement of the futures
price versus its spot price However the existence of mispricing will include a
stochastic component into the consideration Second if there is a correlation between
mispricing and futures return the hedge ratios calculated may not fulfill the variance
minimization rule Third mispricing also has impact on the cost of hedging In general
if the futures contract is overpriced in the first place a short term long cash hedge
gains more than its fair return On the contrary the gain will be lesser than fair returns
if the contract is underpriced
Despite futures contracts and its underlying are traded in different markets the
price movements in two markets have to be in line As the futures contract approaching
its maturity date its price shall gradually converge to its underlying spot price
prevailing in cash market The diffetence be~een the spot price of the underlying ~ bull ~ r-~ bull
bull ~ middot ~ ~ bull ~ t
instrument and price of the futures contract is known as basis It is the net cost of
carrying the futures contract to the maturity date For financial futures the financing
cost for the margin requirement is the primary component of the basis and equity
based futures will have to factor in the dividends receivabl~ by pn 9~er of physical ~t bull I
4
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
List of Figures Page
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures 9
Contract Figure 41 Plots of Futures Premium from Jan 2001 to Dec 2010 50
Figure 42 Distribution of the FKLI contracts premium 51
Figure 43 Plots of standard error between the ackl futures price and 58
theoretical price
xii I i ~ bull t jj
I
List of Abbreviations
8MD Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad
FBMKLCI FTSE Bursa Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
FKLI FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI Futures
KLCI Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
KLOFFE Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financi~ Futures Exchange
MDEX Malaysian Derivatives Exchange Berhad
SampPSOO Standard and Poors 500 Index ~
SPDR Standard and Poors Depository Receipt
ETF Exchange Traded Fund
1 bull
xiii t J
~
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction
The finan~ial world has witnessed more and more attention in the area of
derivative financial instruments in the preceding years Derivatives have gained
reputation and popularity to become the proven form ~frisk management tools Amidst
the few derivatives instruments futures are among the measures that have been widely
used by corporations as a way of protection against unpredictable outcomes of the
markets Futures markets are derivatives markets that exist due to the existence of cash
market The futures markets plays a key role in managing risks related to the
adjustment in price volatility of some assets as well as to provide the opportunities for
speculators (Normas Izani Rasidah amp Saiful 2012)
Futures market was originated from commodities trading especially for
agricultural products A futures contract is defmed as the agreement between two
parties which are the seller and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sen a certain
product The contract states all the details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity
price and the delivery of the product on a predetermined date Both parties have the
responsibilities and obligations to carry outthe ~lt~~~1saction at the maturity date - middot ~ r- ~ t f gtlO p
Nowadays futures market is more popular and widely used in financial sector
- _
Various types of equity and financial derivatives are offered by the futures market in
order to facilitate the trading These derivative products have a wide coverage which
includes currency interbank offer rate government securities ~ock indices and etc ~ t ) -1
1
The futures market is mainly made up by 3 types of market players who are known as
hedgers speculators and arbitrageurs
Hedger is usually a real investor who has taken a position in cash market He uses
futures as insuQince to hedge his portfolio risk in order to minimize his loss if
something happen out of his expectation Hedging refers to a position established in
one market in an attempt to offset exposure to pri(4e fluctuations in the opposite
position in another market with the goal of minimizing ones exposure to unwanted
risk For example fund managers are perpetually with stocks in hand therefore their
risk exposure to the market would be enhanced in declining markets A fund manager
expects that in two months time the share prices will appreciate However he is
worried that unforeseen events may cause prices to decline prior to the time he would
sell his stocks He chooses to trade on BMD and hedges his position by selling the
forward FKLI contract In doing so he haS effectively agreed to lock-in his future
selling price today for a contract that will expire in two months time
Besides hedging FKLI is also used for arbitraging by arbitrageurs When
derivatives are trading above and below their theoretical fair value it is possible to
undertake arbitrage strategies by buying or selling the derivatives and simultaneously
selling or purchasing the underlying st~ks For example the fund manager realizes t- fi~ bull r-~ bull
bull If ~ i 1
that the correlation prices of the cash market and the FKLI market has deviated from bull
If
its usual spreads and that the FKLI is trading at a premium to the cash market
Arbitrage can take place by selling FKLI and buying the underlying shares in the
equity market The position will be liquidated later once the spread o(the prices it tmiddot
~
2
between both markets return to it fair value
However trading of futures contracts by speculators are just like a gambling
activity They are not planning to taking delivery but merely expecting to earn profit
from the differqtce of prices by buying the contract with lower price and selling it with
higher price (Chance amp Brooks 2010) They will observe the trading patterns and post
data on reactions to market announcements to make estimate on possible bullish or
bearish trends For example the fund manger expects a spike up in prices in
anticipation of an increase in buying activities by foreign funds based on the positive
economic data of the country It naturally will increase its exposure and may purchase
stocks and FKLJ simultaneously to maximize its buylong portfolio position
As mentioned earlier futures market is viewed as a hedging tool by the market
players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is adverse
price change in the market Prior to 198~ investors in stock market are having
difficulties in controlling their market risk With the existence of stock indices futures
contract investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without
changing their portfolio composition Due to the low transaction cost involved
investors favor to use stock index futures as a hedging tool This has been proven by
the drastic growth in the futures contrac~ tra9ing volume over the few decades (Gosh bull ~~ middot~i middot
1993)
In order to be a good hedging tool hedgi~g effectiveness is one the important
criteria to measure the perfonnance of the futures contract It implies the accuracy of
the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Ther~for~pricing of the ~ 1 -
3
futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future contract The futures contracts should be priced under an
efficient mechanism to minimize the possibility of mispricing According to Merrick
(1988) misprJcing of futures contract has 3 implications on hedging First when there
is mispricing on the contract hedging will not be riskless if the hedger does not hold
the contract until its maturity date Under the efficient pricing mechanism the return
on a future~ash hedge will purely depend on the relative movement of the futures
price versus its spot price However the existence of mispricing will include a
stochastic component into the consideration Second if there is a correlation between
mispricing and futures return the hedge ratios calculated may not fulfill the variance
minimization rule Third mispricing also has impact on the cost of hedging In general
if the futures contract is overpriced in the first place a short term long cash hedge
gains more than its fair return On the contrary the gain will be lesser than fair returns
if the contract is underpriced
Despite futures contracts and its underlying are traded in different markets the
price movements in two markets have to be in line As the futures contract approaching
its maturity date its price shall gradually converge to its underlying spot price
prevailing in cash market The diffetence be~een the spot price of the underlying ~ bull ~ r-~ bull
bull ~ middot ~ ~ bull ~ t
instrument and price of the futures contract is known as basis It is the net cost of
carrying the futures contract to the maturity date For financial futures the financing
cost for the margin requirement is the primary component of the basis and equity
based futures will have to factor in the dividends receivabl~ by pn 9~er of physical ~t bull I
4
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
List of Abbreviations
8MD Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad
FBMKLCI FTSE Bursa Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
FKLI FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI Futures
KLCI Kuala Lumpur Composite Index
KLOFFE Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financi~ Futures Exchange
MDEX Malaysian Derivatives Exchange Berhad
SampPSOO Standard and Poors 500 Index ~
SPDR Standard and Poors Depository Receipt
ETF Exchange Traded Fund
1 bull
xiii t J
~
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction
The finan~ial world has witnessed more and more attention in the area of
derivative financial instruments in the preceding years Derivatives have gained
reputation and popularity to become the proven form ~frisk management tools Amidst
the few derivatives instruments futures are among the measures that have been widely
used by corporations as a way of protection against unpredictable outcomes of the
markets Futures markets are derivatives markets that exist due to the existence of cash
market The futures markets plays a key role in managing risks related to the
adjustment in price volatility of some assets as well as to provide the opportunities for
speculators (Normas Izani Rasidah amp Saiful 2012)
Futures market was originated from commodities trading especially for
agricultural products A futures contract is defmed as the agreement between two
parties which are the seller and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sen a certain
product The contract states all the details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity
price and the delivery of the product on a predetermined date Both parties have the
responsibilities and obligations to carry outthe ~lt~~~1saction at the maturity date - middot ~ r- ~ t f gtlO p
Nowadays futures market is more popular and widely used in financial sector
- _
Various types of equity and financial derivatives are offered by the futures market in
order to facilitate the trading These derivative products have a wide coverage which
includes currency interbank offer rate government securities ~ock indices and etc ~ t ) -1
1
The futures market is mainly made up by 3 types of market players who are known as
hedgers speculators and arbitrageurs
Hedger is usually a real investor who has taken a position in cash market He uses
futures as insuQince to hedge his portfolio risk in order to minimize his loss if
something happen out of his expectation Hedging refers to a position established in
one market in an attempt to offset exposure to pri(4e fluctuations in the opposite
position in another market with the goal of minimizing ones exposure to unwanted
risk For example fund managers are perpetually with stocks in hand therefore their
risk exposure to the market would be enhanced in declining markets A fund manager
expects that in two months time the share prices will appreciate However he is
worried that unforeseen events may cause prices to decline prior to the time he would
sell his stocks He chooses to trade on BMD and hedges his position by selling the
forward FKLI contract In doing so he haS effectively agreed to lock-in his future
selling price today for a contract that will expire in two months time
Besides hedging FKLI is also used for arbitraging by arbitrageurs When
derivatives are trading above and below their theoretical fair value it is possible to
undertake arbitrage strategies by buying or selling the derivatives and simultaneously
selling or purchasing the underlying st~ks For example the fund manager realizes t- fi~ bull r-~ bull
bull If ~ i 1
that the correlation prices of the cash market and the FKLI market has deviated from bull
If
its usual spreads and that the FKLI is trading at a premium to the cash market
Arbitrage can take place by selling FKLI and buying the underlying shares in the
equity market The position will be liquidated later once the spread o(the prices it tmiddot
~
2
between both markets return to it fair value
However trading of futures contracts by speculators are just like a gambling
activity They are not planning to taking delivery but merely expecting to earn profit
from the differqtce of prices by buying the contract with lower price and selling it with
higher price (Chance amp Brooks 2010) They will observe the trading patterns and post
data on reactions to market announcements to make estimate on possible bullish or
bearish trends For example the fund manger expects a spike up in prices in
anticipation of an increase in buying activities by foreign funds based on the positive
economic data of the country It naturally will increase its exposure and may purchase
stocks and FKLJ simultaneously to maximize its buylong portfolio position
As mentioned earlier futures market is viewed as a hedging tool by the market
players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is adverse
price change in the market Prior to 198~ investors in stock market are having
difficulties in controlling their market risk With the existence of stock indices futures
contract investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without
changing their portfolio composition Due to the low transaction cost involved
investors favor to use stock index futures as a hedging tool This has been proven by
the drastic growth in the futures contrac~ tra9ing volume over the few decades (Gosh bull ~~ middot~i middot
1993)
In order to be a good hedging tool hedgi~g effectiveness is one the important
criteria to measure the perfonnance of the futures contract It implies the accuracy of
the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Ther~for~pricing of the ~ 1 -
3
futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future contract The futures contracts should be priced under an
efficient mechanism to minimize the possibility of mispricing According to Merrick
(1988) misprJcing of futures contract has 3 implications on hedging First when there
is mispricing on the contract hedging will not be riskless if the hedger does not hold
the contract until its maturity date Under the efficient pricing mechanism the return
on a future~ash hedge will purely depend on the relative movement of the futures
price versus its spot price However the existence of mispricing will include a
stochastic component into the consideration Second if there is a correlation between
mispricing and futures return the hedge ratios calculated may not fulfill the variance
minimization rule Third mispricing also has impact on the cost of hedging In general
if the futures contract is overpriced in the first place a short term long cash hedge
gains more than its fair return On the contrary the gain will be lesser than fair returns
if the contract is underpriced
Despite futures contracts and its underlying are traded in different markets the
price movements in two markets have to be in line As the futures contract approaching
its maturity date its price shall gradually converge to its underlying spot price
prevailing in cash market The diffetence be~een the spot price of the underlying ~ bull ~ r-~ bull
bull ~ middot ~ ~ bull ~ t
instrument and price of the futures contract is known as basis It is the net cost of
carrying the futures contract to the maturity date For financial futures the financing
cost for the margin requirement is the primary component of the basis and equity
based futures will have to factor in the dividends receivabl~ by pn 9~er of physical ~t bull I
4
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
11 Introduction
The finan~ial world has witnessed more and more attention in the area of
derivative financial instruments in the preceding years Derivatives have gained
reputation and popularity to become the proven form ~frisk management tools Amidst
the few derivatives instruments futures are among the measures that have been widely
used by corporations as a way of protection against unpredictable outcomes of the
markets Futures markets are derivatives markets that exist due to the existence of cash
market The futures markets plays a key role in managing risks related to the
adjustment in price volatility of some assets as well as to provide the opportunities for
speculators (Normas Izani Rasidah amp Saiful 2012)
Futures market was originated from commodities trading especially for
agricultural products A futures contract is defmed as the agreement between two
parties which are the seller and the buyer who agreed to purchase or sen a certain
product The contract states all the details of the transaction such as the agreed quantity
price and the delivery of the product on a predetermined date Both parties have the
responsibilities and obligations to carry outthe ~lt~~~1saction at the maturity date - middot ~ r- ~ t f gtlO p
Nowadays futures market is more popular and widely used in financial sector
- _
Various types of equity and financial derivatives are offered by the futures market in
order to facilitate the trading These derivative products have a wide coverage which
includes currency interbank offer rate government securities ~ock indices and etc ~ t ) -1
1
The futures market is mainly made up by 3 types of market players who are known as
hedgers speculators and arbitrageurs
Hedger is usually a real investor who has taken a position in cash market He uses
futures as insuQince to hedge his portfolio risk in order to minimize his loss if
something happen out of his expectation Hedging refers to a position established in
one market in an attempt to offset exposure to pri(4e fluctuations in the opposite
position in another market with the goal of minimizing ones exposure to unwanted
risk For example fund managers are perpetually with stocks in hand therefore their
risk exposure to the market would be enhanced in declining markets A fund manager
expects that in two months time the share prices will appreciate However he is
worried that unforeseen events may cause prices to decline prior to the time he would
sell his stocks He chooses to trade on BMD and hedges his position by selling the
forward FKLI contract In doing so he haS effectively agreed to lock-in his future
selling price today for a contract that will expire in two months time
Besides hedging FKLI is also used for arbitraging by arbitrageurs When
derivatives are trading above and below their theoretical fair value it is possible to
undertake arbitrage strategies by buying or selling the derivatives and simultaneously
selling or purchasing the underlying st~ks For example the fund manager realizes t- fi~ bull r-~ bull
bull If ~ i 1
that the correlation prices of the cash market and the FKLI market has deviated from bull
If
its usual spreads and that the FKLI is trading at a premium to the cash market
Arbitrage can take place by selling FKLI and buying the underlying shares in the
equity market The position will be liquidated later once the spread o(the prices it tmiddot
~
2
between both markets return to it fair value
However trading of futures contracts by speculators are just like a gambling
activity They are not planning to taking delivery but merely expecting to earn profit
from the differqtce of prices by buying the contract with lower price and selling it with
higher price (Chance amp Brooks 2010) They will observe the trading patterns and post
data on reactions to market announcements to make estimate on possible bullish or
bearish trends For example the fund manger expects a spike up in prices in
anticipation of an increase in buying activities by foreign funds based on the positive
economic data of the country It naturally will increase its exposure and may purchase
stocks and FKLJ simultaneously to maximize its buylong portfolio position
As mentioned earlier futures market is viewed as a hedging tool by the market
players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is adverse
price change in the market Prior to 198~ investors in stock market are having
difficulties in controlling their market risk With the existence of stock indices futures
contract investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without
changing their portfolio composition Due to the low transaction cost involved
investors favor to use stock index futures as a hedging tool This has been proven by
the drastic growth in the futures contrac~ tra9ing volume over the few decades (Gosh bull ~~ middot~i middot
1993)
In order to be a good hedging tool hedgi~g effectiveness is one the important
criteria to measure the perfonnance of the futures contract It implies the accuracy of
the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Ther~for~pricing of the ~ 1 -
3
futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future contract The futures contracts should be priced under an
efficient mechanism to minimize the possibility of mispricing According to Merrick
(1988) misprJcing of futures contract has 3 implications on hedging First when there
is mispricing on the contract hedging will not be riskless if the hedger does not hold
the contract until its maturity date Under the efficient pricing mechanism the return
on a future~ash hedge will purely depend on the relative movement of the futures
price versus its spot price However the existence of mispricing will include a
stochastic component into the consideration Second if there is a correlation between
mispricing and futures return the hedge ratios calculated may not fulfill the variance
minimization rule Third mispricing also has impact on the cost of hedging In general
if the futures contract is overpriced in the first place a short term long cash hedge
gains more than its fair return On the contrary the gain will be lesser than fair returns
if the contract is underpriced
Despite futures contracts and its underlying are traded in different markets the
price movements in two markets have to be in line As the futures contract approaching
its maturity date its price shall gradually converge to its underlying spot price
prevailing in cash market The diffetence be~een the spot price of the underlying ~ bull ~ r-~ bull
bull ~ middot ~ ~ bull ~ t
instrument and price of the futures contract is known as basis It is the net cost of
carrying the futures contract to the maturity date For financial futures the financing
cost for the margin requirement is the primary component of the basis and equity
based futures will have to factor in the dividends receivabl~ by pn 9~er of physical ~t bull I
4
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
The futures market is mainly made up by 3 types of market players who are known as
hedgers speculators and arbitrageurs
Hedger is usually a real investor who has taken a position in cash market He uses
futures as insuQince to hedge his portfolio risk in order to minimize his loss if
something happen out of his expectation Hedging refers to a position established in
one market in an attempt to offset exposure to pri(4e fluctuations in the opposite
position in another market with the goal of minimizing ones exposure to unwanted
risk For example fund managers are perpetually with stocks in hand therefore their
risk exposure to the market would be enhanced in declining markets A fund manager
expects that in two months time the share prices will appreciate However he is
worried that unforeseen events may cause prices to decline prior to the time he would
sell his stocks He chooses to trade on BMD and hedges his position by selling the
forward FKLI contract In doing so he haS effectively agreed to lock-in his future
selling price today for a contract that will expire in two months time
Besides hedging FKLI is also used for arbitraging by arbitrageurs When
derivatives are trading above and below their theoretical fair value it is possible to
undertake arbitrage strategies by buying or selling the derivatives and simultaneously
selling or purchasing the underlying st~ks For example the fund manager realizes t- fi~ bull r-~ bull
bull If ~ i 1
that the correlation prices of the cash market and the FKLI market has deviated from bull
If
its usual spreads and that the FKLI is trading at a premium to the cash market
Arbitrage can take place by selling FKLI and buying the underlying shares in the
equity market The position will be liquidated later once the spread o(the prices it tmiddot
~
2
between both markets return to it fair value
However trading of futures contracts by speculators are just like a gambling
activity They are not planning to taking delivery but merely expecting to earn profit
from the differqtce of prices by buying the contract with lower price and selling it with
higher price (Chance amp Brooks 2010) They will observe the trading patterns and post
data on reactions to market announcements to make estimate on possible bullish or
bearish trends For example the fund manger expects a spike up in prices in
anticipation of an increase in buying activities by foreign funds based on the positive
economic data of the country It naturally will increase its exposure and may purchase
stocks and FKLJ simultaneously to maximize its buylong portfolio position
As mentioned earlier futures market is viewed as a hedging tool by the market
players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is adverse
price change in the market Prior to 198~ investors in stock market are having
difficulties in controlling their market risk With the existence of stock indices futures
contract investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without
changing their portfolio composition Due to the low transaction cost involved
investors favor to use stock index futures as a hedging tool This has been proven by
the drastic growth in the futures contrac~ tra9ing volume over the few decades (Gosh bull ~~ middot~i middot
1993)
In order to be a good hedging tool hedgi~g effectiveness is one the important
criteria to measure the perfonnance of the futures contract It implies the accuracy of
the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Ther~for~pricing of the ~ 1 -
3
futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future contract The futures contracts should be priced under an
efficient mechanism to minimize the possibility of mispricing According to Merrick
(1988) misprJcing of futures contract has 3 implications on hedging First when there
is mispricing on the contract hedging will not be riskless if the hedger does not hold
the contract until its maturity date Under the efficient pricing mechanism the return
on a future~ash hedge will purely depend on the relative movement of the futures
price versus its spot price However the existence of mispricing will include a
stochastic component into the consideration Second if there is a correlation between
mispricing and futures return the hedge ratios calculated may not fulfill the variance
minimization rule Third mispricing also has impact on the cost of hedging In general
if the futures contract is overpriced in the first place a short term long cash hedge
gains more than its fair return On the contrary the gain will be lesser than fair returns
if the contract is underpriced
Despite futures contracts and its underlying are traded in different markets the
price movements in two markets have to be in line As the futures contract approaching
its maturity date its price shall gradually converge to its underlying spot price
prevailing in cash market The diffetence be~een the spot price of the underlying ~ bull ~ r-~ bull
bull ~ middot ~ ~ bull ~ t
instrument and price of the futures contract is known as basis It is the net cost of
carrying the futures contract to the maturity date For financial futures the financing
cost for the margin requirement is the primary component of the basis and equity
based futures will have to factor in the dividends receivabl~ by pn 9~er of physical ~t bull I
4
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
between both markets return to it fair value
However trading of futures contracts by speculators are just like a gambling
activity They are not planning to taking delivery but merely expecting to earn profit
from the differqtce of prices by buying the contract with lower price and selling it with
higher price (Chance amp Brooks 2010) They will observe the trading patterns and post
data on reactions to market announcements to make estimate on possible bullish or
bearish trends For example the fund manger expects a spike up in prices in
anticipation of an increase in buying activities by foreign funds based on the positive
economic data of the country It naturally will increase its exposure and may purchase
stocks and FKLJ simultaneously to maximize its buylong portfolio position
As mentioned earlier futures market is viewed as a hedging tool by the market
players in order to minimize the risk exposure in cash market when there is adverse
price change in the market Prior to 198~ investors in stock market are having
difficulties in controlling their market risk With the existence of stock indices futures
contract investors are now having a better control in managing their risk without
changing their portfolio composition Due to the low transaction cost involved
investors favor to use stock index futures as a hedging tool This has been proven by
the drastic growth in the futures contrac~ tra9ing volume over the few decades (Gosh bull ~~ middot~i middot
1993)
In order to be a good hedging tool hedgi~g effectiveness is one the important
criteria to measure the perfonnance of the futures contract It implies the accuracy of
the futures contract to reflect its underlying market position Ther~for~pricing of the ~ 1 -
3
futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future contract The futures contracts should be priced under an
efficient mechanism to minimize the possibility of mispricing According to Merrick
(1988) misprJcing of futures contract has 3 implications on hedging First when there
is mispricing on the contract hedging will not be riskless if the hedger does not hold
the contract until its maturity date Under the efficient pricing mechanism the return
on a future~ash hedge will purely depend on the relative movement of the futures
price versus its spot price However the existence of mispricing will include a
stochastic component into the consideration Second if there is a correlation between
mispricing and futures return the hedge ratios calculated may not fulfill the variance
minimization rule Third mispricing also has impact on the cost of hedging In general
if the futures contract is overpriced in the first place a short term long cash hedge
gains more than its fair return On the contrary the gain will be lesser than fair returns
if the contract is underpriced
Despite futures contracts and its underlying are traded in different markets the
price movements in two markets have to be in line As the futures contract approaching
its maturity date its price shall gradually converge to its underlying spot price
prevailing in cash market The diffetence be~een the spot price of the underlying ~ bull ~ r-~ bull
bull ~ middot ~ ~ bull ~ t
instrument and price of the futures contract is known as basis It is the net cost of
carrying the futures contract to the maturity date For financial futures the financing
cost for the margin requirement is the primary component of the basis and equity
based futures will have to factor in the dividends receivabl~ by pn 9~er of physical ~t bull I
4
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
futures contract is very crucial because it will affect the hedging ability and
performance of a future contract The futures contracts should be priced under an
efficient mechanism to minimize the possibility of mispricing According to Merrick
(1988) misprJcing of futures contract has 3 implications on hedging First when there
is mispricing on the contract hedging will not be riskless if the hedger does not hold
the contract until its maturity date Under the efficient pricing mechanism the return
on a future~ash hedge will purely depend on the relative movement of the futures
price versus its spot price However the existence of mispricing will include a
stochastic component into the consideration Second if there is a correlation between
mispricing and futures return the hedge ratios calculated may not fulfill the variance
minimization rule Third mispricing also has impact on the cost of hedging In general
if the futures contract is overpriced in the first place a short term long cash hedge
gains more than its fair return On the contrary the gain will be lesser than fair returns
if the contract is underpriced
Despite futures contracts and its underlying are traded in different markets the
price movements in two markets have to be in line As the futures contract approaching
its maturity date its price shall gradually converge to its underlying spot price
prevailing in cash market The diffetence be~een the spot price of the underlying ~ bull ~ r-~ bull
bull ~ middot ~ ~ bull ~ t
instrument and price of the futures contract is known as basis It is the net cost of
carrying the futures contract to the maturity date For financial futures the financing
cost for the margin requirement is the primary component of the basis and equity
based futures will have to factor in the dividends receivabl~ by pn 9~er of physical ~t bull I
4
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
Pusat Khidmat Maklumat Akademik UNIVERSm MALAYSIA SARAWAK
stocks (Shahabudin 2006)
Basis can be illustrated from the simple mathematical fonnula as
B=F-S
where B = qasis
F = Futures Price
S = Spot Price
IfF is greater than S then the basis is positive and the futures contract is traded at
a premium On the other hand if S is greater than F it shows a negative basis and the
futures contract is traded at a discount
Price convergence model indicates that price discrepancies between the cash
market and futures market should not last long An effective arbitrage activity is vital
to make sure prices in both markets are moving in line In simple words arbitrage is
the simultaneous purchase and sale of a security in two different markets It is a trade
that profits by exploiting price differences which is also considered as risk-free profits
Arbitrage exists due to market inefficiencies where there is price deviation between
futures market and cash market Arbitrageurs create a mechanism to ensure that prices
do not deviate substantially from its fair price for a long period of time If they fail to
do so it will have a great impact on h~ging perfonnance Therefore ifarbitrage is not - ~ bull - ~ middot middot~ ~i bullmiddot
effective futures market will not be a good hedging tool for the investor
(Shahabudin 2006)
I
5
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
12 Background of Study
Before the introduction of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index
Futures (FKLI) on 15 December 1995 investors in Malaysia have no other alternatives
to manage theiryisk In order to control the risk of their investment portfolio they need
to diversify their investment portfolio When Kuala Lumpur Options amp Financial
Futures Exchange (KLOFFE) started trading the futvres in Malaysia it provides a
better way for the investors to mitigate their market risk without changing their
portfolio content Moreover the existence of the futures contracts facilitates their
investment strategy by reducing the necessity of reviewing and rearranging their
portfolio which incurred a high transaction cost (pok amp Poshakwale 2004) Nowadays
the FKLI is traded under Bursa Malaysia Derivatives Berhad (BMD)
The underlying asset of FKLI futures is Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI)
which was initially made up of 100 most actively traded stocks from approximately
500 to 650 companies listed in the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia The KLCI is a
market value weighted index The index is one of the most widely followed by the
investors because KLCI represents the overall performance of the stocks listed in
Bursa Malaysia The index has generally been accepted as the local stock market
barometer The KLCI which was intrOjiu~ in 1986 is to serve as a performance t 1 bullbull- ~ bull ~i
indicator ofour stock market as well as our economy as a whole (Zulkamain amp Sofian
- ~ 201 2)
In order to ensure KLC remains as a robust performance indicator for the stock
market and economy as well as strengthen its linkage with international market Bursa J i tmiddot I
6
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
Malaysia has partnered with FTSE to integrate the KLCI with an internationally
accepted index calculation methodology The main purpose of employing this
methodology is to provide a more investable tradable and transparently managed
index to trad-s and market players The enhanced index is known as FTSE Bursa
Malaysia KLCI It has been implemented on 6th July 2009 In contrast with KLCI the
FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI only consists of 30 lalYfst companies listed on the main
board of Bursa Malaysia However FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI maintains the
continuity of the KLCI index value therefore preserves the historical movements of
Malaysian stock market (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012)
Meanwhile FKLI is basically the futures contract of the overall perfonnance of
the Bursa Malaysia and its underlying instrument is FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI The
stock indices are traded in the futures exchange where it is basically a market for
traders to trade futures contracts (Zulkarnain amp Sofian 2012) The FKLI is a cash
settled contract and is actively used by both the institutional and retail investors in their
respective trading portfolios It simply means that there is no more physical delivery of
the KLCI shares at the maturity date The transaction will only involve the transfer of
cash which amount equals to the difference between the futures price and the spot
price at the maturity date (Mohamad IL HflSsa~ 2000) Three types of contracts are It-~ bull bull - ~~ rr ~ iiamp
traded in futures market at each point oftime It includes spot month contracts the next
~
month contract and the next two calendar quarterly months The cash value of a futures
contract is depending on the KLCI index point Each point i$ equal to RMSO and the
minimum price fluctuation is RM25 which represents OS ~ints~hallge in index On t-f middot ) ~ bull
7
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
the fmal trading day which is the last business day in the month the actual index point
will be rounded to the nearest 05 index point to detennine the final settlement
(BursaMalaysia 2011) Table 11 is the summary of the specifications of FKLI futures
Fieure 11 sJiows the historical daily price trend for spot month FKLI futures contract
from the period Jan 200 1 to Dec 2010
middot
I middot
middot middot
Contract Cod~ FKLI+ Contract Instmmmt+
I FfSE Bursa Malaysia KualaLumpur Composite Index (FBM KLCI~
Contract Siz~ FBM KLCI multiplied by RM5Q+J Minimum Price Fluctuation +
05 index point valued at RM25
Daily Price Limits 20~o per trading session for the respective contract month except for the spot month coDlIact There shall be no price limits for the second month contract for the final five Business Days before expiration
Contract Months Spot month the next month and the next two calendar quanedy months The ea1enciu quarterly months ue MMeh June September and December+
Trading Hours+ First trading session Malaysian 845 am to 1245 pm Second trading session Malaysian 230 pm to 515 pm
FmalTIading Day The last Business Day of the contract month Fmal Sdtlemmt Cash settlement based on the Final Settlement Valu~
Fmal Settlement Va1u~
The final settlement value shall be the average value rounded to the nearest 05 of an index point (values of 025 or 075 and above being rounded upwards) taken at every 15 seconds or at
such intervals as may be determined by the Exchange from time to time from 34530 pm to 44515 pm plus one value after 500 pm oftht FB~ IqCI on the Final Trading Day excepting the 3 highest and 310westva)~es-middotmiddot middot ~~ middotmiddot~ ~I bullbull middot
Speculative PositionLimit
Maximum number if net long or net shon positions to beheld I 10000 contracts for allmonth combinedgt
Source Bursa Malaysia Official Website
Table 11 Specifications ofFKLI futures contract I I
~
8
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
middotbull J
pfutures ~
180000
1150000
140000
120000 ~
100000 10
- Plutures ~80000
60000
1 40000
1- ~
] 000 -
020101 0201(~ )2jOl03 02)1j04 020105 020106 020107 02010B 02(0109 0201(10
Figure 11 Historical Daily Price Trend for Spot Month FKLI Futures Contract
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
13 Problem Statement
As hedging effectiveness of the contracts is the main factor that breaking down the
success future contracts many researchers have made substantia immersion into this
subject topic (~hnston amp McConnell 1989) Researchers are always studying how
far hedgers are willing to go in order to cut down their cash price risk by employing
futures contracts Nevertheless the hedging effectiven~s ofa futures contract is highly
dependent on the magnitude of which the contract can emulate the underlying market
precisely Hence hedging ability relies strictly on the pricing of the futures itself
According to the cost of carry model the futures price should equal to the cash
price of its underlying asset and transaction costs As a result arbitrageurs will always
try to enter the markets and at the same time buy the cheaper cash asset and sell the
futures contract with the prevailing higher price when the arbitrage profit is higher than
risk-free return As mentioned earlier arbitrage opportunities are available when the
actual futures prices deviate from its fair theoretical price and the difference must be
greater than the transaction cost involved in the arbitrage process These responses will
push the futures prices to get properly regulated and even up with its fair price
Without an efficient arbitrage the futures price can digress greatly from its fair price
causing hedgers dislike to employing futpres p1a~et in the aftermath due to its meager ~ ~ ~ -bullbull~ ~ middot ~ -=i f middot middotmiddot
hedging results and ambivalence of the pricing process (Mohamad amp Hassan 2000) ~ _
As discussed above the accuracy of the futures contracts pricing will have a direct
effect on investors hedging strategies and the arbitrage profit llte main area of concern
of the study is targeted on the pricing efficiency of the Malaysia ~~oc~ index futures bull ~ f I bull -1 - bull bull
10
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11
Before this many empirical results have shown the presence of significant and ongoing
price deviations in the stock index futures prices from its fair prices namely in the
futures markets in developing countries Among these countries is the persistent
undergoing foupd in the Korean Stock index futures market Gay and Jung (1999)
suggest that these mispricing can be justified by applying substitute sets of transaction
cost and restrictions on short-sale faced by different gr~ups of investors
It is interesting to realize that such a persistent mispricing is encountered by other
~ developing markets such as Korea Question arises to dealing with the current trend in
Malaysia futures market as this is also one of the developing markets The pricing
efficiency of Malaysia futures market is examined by applying cost of carry model
Results will be analyzed in order to detennine whether Malaysia as a developing
market is having the same problem as other developing markets facing or it can as
perform efficient as a developed market
14 Research Questions
Among the questions from the issues discussed
1 Is the Malaysia futures market price~fficient over the test period
2 Does arbitrage opportunity exist in Malaysia FKLI futures market after taking
transaction cost into consideration
15 Research Objectives
bull L- ~
The general objective of this study is to identify the arbitrage opportunities and
pricing efficiency for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Composite Index Futures
(FKLI) i
11