Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of...

18
Federal 888 Firs Washing Attention R Commis E Energy biweekly Descrip O the Natu authoriz diamete Texas; ( and (iii) project Novemb certificat Submitt In EPNG is April 18, 1 See E Energy Re st Street, N. gton, D.C. n: Ms. Kim Re: El Pa Dock Proje ssioners: El Paso Nat Regulatory y project sta ption of Pro On April 27 ural Gas A zation to co r loop line o (ii) the new the new Dr is referred ber 21, 20 te. 1 tal of Proje n complianc s providing , 2020. El Paso Natu egulatory Co .E. 20426 mberly D. Bo aso Natural et No. CP1 ct Status R tural Gas C y Commiss atus report oceeding , 2018, EP Act request onstruct, ow of its existin w Red Mou ragoon Com to as the 19, the Co ect Status ce with En Project St ural Gas Co ommission ose, Secret Gas Comp 8-332-000 Report No. 1 Company, L sion ("Com related to t PNG submit ing a certif wn, and op ng Line No untain Com mpressor S e “South M ommission Report vironmenta atus Repor ompany, L.L. ary pany, L.L.C 10 L.L.C. (“EPN mmission") the South M tted its app ficate of pu perate: (i) a s. 1100 an mpressor St Station locat Mainline Ex issued an al Condition rt No. 10 fo C., 169 FER Ap .; NG”) is her in Docke Mainline Ex plication, p ublic conve an approxim d 1103 bet tation in Lu ted in Coch xpansion P n Order gra n No. 8 of or the perio RC ¶ 61,133 pril 23, 2020 reby filing w t No. CP1 xpansion Pr ursuant to enience an mately 17- tween Huec una County hise County Project” or anting EPN Appendix A od of April 5 3 (2019). 0 with the Fed 18-332-000 roject. Section 7( nd necessit mile, thirty co and El P y, New Me y, Arizona. “Project.” NG’s reque A to the O 5, 2020 thro deral 0, its (c) of ty for -inch Paso, exico; This On ested Order, ough

Transcript of Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of...

Page 1: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

Federal 888 FirsWashing Attention

R

Commis

EEnergy biweekly Descrip

Othe NatuauthorizdiameteTexas; (and (iii) project Novembcertificat Submitt

InEPNG isApril 18,

1 See E

Energy Rest Street, N.gton, D.C.

n: Ms. Kim

Re: El PaDockProje

ssioners:

El Paso NatRegulatory

y project sta

ption of Pro

On April 27ural Gas A

zation to cor loop line o(ii) the newthe new Dris referred

ber 21, 20te.1

tal of Proje

n compliancs providing , 2020.

El Paso Natu

egulatory Co.E. 20426

mberly D. Bo

aso Natural et No. CP1ct Status R

tural Gas Cy Commissatus report

oceeding

, 2018, EPAct requestonstruct, owof its existin

w Red Mouragoon Com to as the19, the Co

ect Status

ce with EnProject St

ural Gas Co

ommission

ose, Secret

Gas Comp8-332-000

Report No. 1

Company, Lsion ("Comrelated to t

PNG submiting a certifwn, and opng Line Nountain Commpressor Se “South Mommission

Report

vironmentaatus Repor

ompany, L.L.

ary

pany, L.L.C

10

L.L.C. (“EPNmmission")the South M

tted its appficate of puperate: (i) as. 1100 an

mpressor StStation locatMainline Ex

issued an

al Conditionrt No. 10 fo

C., 169 FER

Ap

.;

NG”) is herin Docke

Mainline Ex

plication, public convean approximd 1103 bettation in Luted in Cochxpansion P

n Order gra

n No. 8 of or the perio

RC ¶ 61,133

pril 23, 2020

reby filing wt No. CP1

xpansion Pr

ursuant to enience anmately 17-tween Huecuna Countyhise CountyProject” or anting EPN

Appendix Aod of April 5

3 (2019).

0

with the Fed18-332-000roject.

Section 7(nd necessitmile, thirtyco and El Py, New Mey, Arizona.

“Project.”NG’s reque

A to the O5, 2020 thro

deral 0, its

(c) of ty for -inch

Paso, exico;

This On

ested

Order, ough

Page 2: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports

EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to an informal inquiry from the Commission’s Office of Energy Projects (“OEP”) regarding EPNG’s noise report that was provided as part of its previous Project Status Report No. 9 filed on April 9, 2020.2 Specifically, the OEP is seeking to understand the difference between anticipated noise levels and higher noise levels measured during HDD activities.

EPNG notes that the estimated modeled day-night average sound level (Ldn)

presented in the February 21, 2020 noise mitigation plan for the closest noise-sensitive receptor, NSA 1, was estimated to be approximately 57.5 dBA. This modeling data used information provided by Behrens and Associates for HDD equipment that is similar to what was actually used at the Montana Ave. HDD entry site, the equipment layout, and the estimated locations and heights of noise barriers. The model only included those pieces of equipment considered as the major contributors of noise for these activities (i.e., the power unit, the drill rig, trackhoe and the mud equipment).

The noise monitoring survey included in the report filed on April 9, 2020 showed

a noise level of 63.1 dBA Leq that was recorded at NSA 1 while HDD drill rig equipment was running at full capacity.

Based on a follow up review of HDD activities, there were two main contributors

to the higher modeled noise levels that were actually observed. 1. Short-term (1 hour) monitoring was conducted following the completion of the

HDD activities on the day that the noise survey was taken. The resulting 1-hr Leq value was reported as 50.2 dBA. When compared against the Lday value from EPNG’s July 20, 2018 monitoring survey and included as Table 4 in the noise mitigation plan (i.e., 46.7 dBA), an increase of 3.5 dBA was experienced with respect to the Lday level recorded during the noise survey for the HDD. In other words, the ambient background noise levels observed while conducting HDD activities were higher than when the baseline was originally established.

2. In addition, during the HDD monitoring survey, additional noise-emitting sources that were not anticipated were observed. Specifically, there were various contractor pick-up trucks and a semi-trailer truck operating within the construction area during the data collection period. The additional noise emitted from these transient noise sources elevated the noise levels above what was considered in the February 21, 2020 modeling exercise.

  

2 The noise report reflected measured noise levels taken at a horizontal directional drill

(“HDD”) entry site near Montana Avenue in El Paso County, Texas. The report indicated that HDD noise related noise levels were higher than the predicted mitigated levels presented in a pre-construction noise mitigation plan previously filed on February 21, 2020.

Page 3: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -3- April 23, 2020 Filing Information

EPNG is e-Filing this letter, report and attachment with the Commission's Secretary in accordance with the Commission's Order No. 703, Filing Via the Internet, guidelines issued on November 15, 2007 in Docket No. RM07-16-000.

Respectfully submitted, EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY, L.L.C. By: /s/

Francisco Tarin Director, Regulatory

Enclosures

Page 4: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

  EPNG’s 

Docket 

Project 

Project 

County/

Reporti

EnvironInspecto

1. SUMDrag

C

Cfm

Ct

Red

C

C

Ct

C

Ccc

Ct

 17‐M

T

DA

R

Biweekly En

No. CP18‐33

Name: 

Component

/State: 

ng Period: 

nmental ors: 

MMARY OF Cgoon Compr

Conducted f

Continued  afabrication, main gas pip

Continued athe auxiliary

Continued b

d Mountain C

Conducted f

Completed t

Completed dturbine air in

Completed s

Completed connecting  tcable tray su

Conducted ato air tanks, 

Mile Loop Lin

The HDD of 

Ditching,  loAvenue, and

Rough  clean

nvironmenta

32‐000 

South

ts:  Drago17‐M

CochiLuna MounCount(17‐M

April 

David(Red 

CONSTRUCTressor Statio

finishing wor

activity  assosandblastinping and utili

ctivities relay and compre

ackfilling ut

Compressor 

finishing wor

tie‐in to the 

dry pack gronlet filter, an

stress cuts in

concrete  pto  compressupports, and

additional mplant water

ne 

Montana Av

owering‐in, d at the HDD

n‐up,  final  c

al Inspector

h Mainline E

oon Compreile Loop Line

se  County, County, 

ntain  CS); ties, Texas 

Mile Loop Lin

5, 2020 to A

d McCullougMountain CS

TION ACTIVITon 

rk on the aux

ociated  withg  and  paintities piping.

ating to the essor buildin

ility piping d

Station 

rk on the aux

existing Line

out for gas cnd air inlet d

n gas cooler 

pours  in  vasor building d sleepers fo

iscellaneousr and sewer.

venue was co

padding,  anD site betwee

lean‐up,  an

r Report No.

Expansion Pr

ssor Statione 

Arizona  (DNew  Me

Hudspeth  a

ne) 

April 18, 2020

h (Lead EI, 1S EI, Dragoo

TY FOR INSP

xiliary buildi

h  station  foting,  and  ins

installation ngs and addi

ditch around

xiliary buildi

e No. 1100.  

cooler piers,duct support

housekeepi

arious  locaand gas  cor 36‐inch lin

s‐type activit

ompleted du

nd  backfill en Van St. an

d  seeding  c

. 10 

roject 

, Red Mount

Dragoon  CS)exico  (Redand  El  Paso

17‐Mile Looon CS EI) 

PECTION PER

ing and com

oundations stallation  of

of electricaitional areas

 auxiliary bu

ing and com

 

, piers for et.  

ng pad. 

ations  incluoolers, muffle. 

ties to includ

uring this re

were  condnd Julie Ln.

continued  so

tain Compre

); d o 

 Date: 4/

p Line EI), K

RIOD: 

mpressor buil

forming/rebf  above  and

l conduit ans. 

uilding. 

mpressor buil

xhaust silen

ding  cable ler  support 

de electrical

porting peri

ducted  nort

outh  to  Hue

essor Station

23/2020 

Kendrick Mo

lding.  

bar/pours,  pd  below  gro

nd cable tray

lding. 

ncer foundat

tray  suppfoundation 

l work and t

od. 

th  of  Mont

eco  Compre

 

n,  

oholt 

pipe ound 

ys in 

tion, 

ports and 

ie in 

tana 

ssor 

Page 5: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

  

S

TA

AS

T 2. RELE

DurDrag

 3. ENV

TheThishydworcont

 4. ENV

The 5. ISSU

No l 6. WO

DragActi

 RedActi

Station, and 

The hydroteApril 16, 202

A successfulStation was 

The hydrote

EVANT ENVIing this repogoon CS and

VIRONMENTre was one s  spill  occurraulic  fluid. rking near Sttained, and t

VIRONMENTre were no e

UES AND COandowner is

RK PLANNEDgoon Comprvities planne

Continue

continue

continuepiping di

continueauxiliary

d Mountain Cvities planne

Continuecompress

begin hyd

conduct bolt up oslabs and

north of Mo

st discharge20. 

 hydrotest ocompleted d

st dewaterin

IRONMENTAorting periodd eight at Re

AL PROBLEMfluid spill onred  on  Apri  It was  cautation No. 1the materia

AL COMPLIAenvironment

NCERNS IDEssues or con

D FOR THE Fressor Statioed for the ne

e pipe fabric

e installing th

e  backfilling itch around 

e  sandblastiy building ram

Compressor ed for the ne

e finish work osor building; drotest of the

other  miscelon inlet and od various elec

ontana Aven

e permit was

of  the mainduring this re

ng structure 

AL ACTIVITIEd, thirteen (1d Mountain 

MS/ISSUES An the 17‐Mill  11,  2020, sed by  the 10070+50. Tl was placed

ANCE ISSUEStal complian

ENTIFIED BY ncerns were 

FOLLOWINGon ext reporting

cation of ma

he 30‐inch d

activities  toauxiliary bu

ng  and  paimps.   

Station ext reporting

on the auxilia

e station suct

llaneous‐typeoutlet comprtrical work.  

nue. 

s received fr

line pipe beeporting per

was constru

ES: 13) people rCS).   

AND CORRECe Loop Lineand  consistfailure of a he hoe wasd into a DOT 

S/RESOLUTInce issues id

LANDOWNidentified d

 REPORTING

g period incl

in gas and u

discharge pip

o  include  thilding; and

nting  activit

g period incl

ary building a

ion and disch

e  activities  toessor, pipe w

rom the Tex

etween MLVriod. 

ucted, and d

received env

CTIVE ACTIO recorded dted  of  approhydraulic h

s  immediatedrum to aw

ONS: entified dur

ERS: uring this re

G PERIOD: 

lude: 

utility system

ping and aux

he  30‐inch  d

ties  and  po

lude: 

nd potentiall

harge piping; 

o  include  sanwelding, pour

xas Railroad 

V 23 and Hu

dewatering w

vironmental 

ONS TAKEN:uring this reoximately  oose on a paly shut dow

wait disposal.

ring this repo

eporting peri

m piping; 

xiliary system

discharge  pi

ouring  the  c

y complete fi

and 

ndblasting  anring compress

Commission

ueco Compe

was complet

training (fiv

: eporting perone  (1)  quaradding  trackwn,  the spill .   

orting period

iod. 

m piping; 

iping  and  ut

compressor 

inish work on

nd  painting, sor building d

 

n on 

ssor 

ted. 

ve at 

riod. rt  of khoe was 

d. 

tility 

and 

n the 

final door 

Page 6: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

  

17‐MActi

 

  

Mile Loop Linvities planne

Cleaningupcomin

tie‐ins  ahydrotesbackfille

ne ed for the ne

g and dryingng reporting 

are  anticipatst  site  at  Std, cleaned u

 

ext reporting

g of the pipeperiod; and

ted  to  be  mtation  No.  9up, and seed

g period incl

e from the hd 

made  at  th9995+00.    Aded.   

lude: 

hydrotest w

he  north  anAfter  being 

ill be condu

d  south  entied‐in,  the

cted during

nds,  and  at se  sites  wil

 

  the 

the l  be 

Page 7: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

  Photos 

LocationCompresDirectionNorth Descriptiwork (roocompres

LocationCompresDirectionWest Descripticoncrete

 

: Dragoon ssor Station n of Photo: 

ion: Finish ofing) on sor building

: Dragoon ssor Station n of Photo: 

ion: Finishin work. 

 

 

Page 8: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

  Photos 

LocationCompresDirectionEast Descripti30‐inch dpiping to

LocationCompresDescriptioverlookreporting

 

: Dragoon ssor Station n of Photo: 

ion: Levelingdischarge o tie in point

: Dragoon ssor Station ion: Site k during g period. 

 

 

Page 9: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

  Photos 

LocationMountaiCompresStation DirectionPhoto: SoDescriptiFinish wo(siding) compresbuilding. 

LocationMountaiCompresStation DirectionPhoto: WDescriptitray founwork. 

 

: Red n ssor 

n of outh ion: ork 

sor 

: Red n ssor 

n of West ion: Cable ndation 

 

 

Page 10: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

  Photos 

LocationMountaiCompresStation DirectionPhoto: SoDescriptito Line N

LocationMountaiCompresStation Descriptioverviewreporting

 

: Red n ssor 

n of outh ion: Tie in No. 1100. 

: Red n ssor 

ion: Site w during g period. 

 

 

 

Page 11: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

  Photos 

LocationLoop LineDirectionSoutheasDescriptiExcavatinditch neaNo. 1010

LocationLoop LineDirectionNorthweDescriptiJeeping tnear Stat10102+0

 

: 17‐Mile e n of Photo: st ion: ng the ar Station 04+00. 

: 17‐Mile e n of Photo:  est ion: the pipe tion No. 0. 

 

 

 

Page 12: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

  Photos 

LocationLoop LineDirectionPhoto: NDescriptiLoweringthe ditchStation N10102+0

LocationLoop LineDirectionPhoto: NDescriptiPadding tnear Stat10104+0

 

: 17‐Mile e n of Northwest ion: g pipe into h near No. 0. 

: 17‐Mile e  n of Northwest  ion: the pipe tion No. 0. 

 

 

 

Page 13: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

  Photos 

LocationLoop LineDirectionPhoto: NDescriptibeing puthrough north sidMontanaHDD neaNo. 1009

LocationLoop LineDirectionPhoto: NDescriptiSpreadinback oveROW neaNo. 1009

: 17‐Mile e n of Northwest ion: Pipe lled on the de of the a Ave. r Station 91+00. 

: 17‐Mile e n of Northwest ion: g topsoil 

er the ar Station 98+00. 

 

 

 

Page 14: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

  Photos 

LocationLoop LineDirectionPhoto: SoDescriptiSpreadinback oveROW neaNo. 9375

LocationLoop LineDirectionPhoto: NDescriptiCleaning 10 near SNo. 9302

 

: 17‐Mile e n of outheast ion: g topsoil 

er the ar Station 5+00. 

: 17‐Mile e n of Northwest ion: up Wash Station 2+00. 

 

 

 

 

Page 15: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

  Photos 

LocationLoop LineDirectionPhoto: NDescriptiSeeding tnear Stat9451+00

LocationLoop LineDirectionPhoto: SoDescriptiSeeding tnear Stat9340+00

 

: 17‐Mile e n of Northwest ion: the ROW tion No. . 

: 17‐Mile e n of outheast ion: the ROW tion No. . 

 

 

 

 

Page 16: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

  Photos 

LocationLoop LineDirectionPhoto: SoDescriptiCleaned north of Avenue. Station N10095+0

LocationLoop LineDirectionPhoto: NDescriptiSeeding tnear Stat10095+0

 

: 17‐Mile e n of outheast ion: up ROW Montana near No. 0. 

: 17‐Mile e n of Northwest ion: the ROW tion No. 0. 

 

 

 

 

Page 17: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

  Photos 

LocationLoop LineDirectionNorth Descriptiheader atesting lonear Stat9995+00

LocationLoop LineDirectionNorth DescriptiDewaterhydrotesthrough tdiffusor idewateristructure

 

: 17‐Mile e n of Photo: 

ion: Test t the ocation tion No. . 

: 17‐Mile e n of Photo: 

ion: ing the st water the into the ing e. 

 

 

Page 18: Appril 23, 2020 Federal · Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -2- April 23, 2020 Explanation of Differences in HDD Noise Reports EPNG is also providing an explanation pursuant to

Certificate of Service I hereby certify that I have this day caused a copy of the foregoing document to be served upon each person designated on the official service list compiled by the Commission's Secretary in this proceeding in accordance with the requirements of Section 385.2010 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. Dated at Colorado Springs, Colorado as of this 23rd day of April, 2020.

/s/ Francisco Tarin

Two North Nevada Avenue Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903 (719) 667-7517