Applying genomic tools to loblolly...
Transcript of Applying genomic tools to loblolly...
-
Applying genomic tools to loblolly pine Adding value to our germplasm and our products
W. Patrick Cumbie, Dudley A. Huber, Salvador Gezan, Victor Steel, and Michael Cunningham
January 13, 2020
-
2
Summerville, SC –Global HQ
Whakatane, NZ –Australasia HQ
Australasia• 20MM in Sales• 40% of NZ Pine Mkt• 20% of Aus Pine Mkt
North America• 340 MM in Sales• ~1/3 of Pine Market• 80% of MCP
Leading seedling producer with 450 million trees per year
Global operations• Southern U.S.• Brazil• New Zealand & Australia
Providing step-changes in tree productivity
• Faster growth • Improved log & wood quality• Disease resistance• Biomass production
ArborGen OverviewGlobal Leader in Seedling Genetics & Production
Campinas, SP, BR –S. America HQ
Australasia• 22MM in Sales• ~40% of NZ Pine Market• 20% of Australian Pine
Market
Brazil• 65 MM in Sales• Eucalyptus• 10 M Elite Pine
-
3
ArborGen Nursery Platforms
Bare Root Nursery Containerized Nursery
-
4
Three Major Categories of Loblolly Genetics Today
4
MCP ® MCP-Select MCP-Elite Varieties1, 2, 3, 4….
Mass Controlled PollinatedOpen
Pollinated Varietals
• Multiple copies of best MCP seedlings, selected from extensive trials
• With the acquisition of CellFor, ArborGen is the only company in the world with the ability to produce varieties at scale
• Produced from best mother & fertilizedwith pollen of an unknown father tree
• Seedlings produced from best mother and father
• ArborGen’s has the most advanced and most broadly adapted MCP pipeline in the industry
OP Advanced, Select & Elite
Elite Genetics Products
ADVANCING GENETICS THROUGH BREEDING
-
5
MCP® ProductionOver 900K pollination bags installed in 2019
-
6
What type of tree do we seek?
Growth Stem Straightness
Rust Resistance
ReducedForking
-
7
Why pursue genomic prediction?
• Breeding cycle: 12+ years
• Seed production: 8-10 years
• Seed development after pollination: 2 years
• Seed orchard lifespan: 25-30 years
• Crop rotation: 25 years
Breeding, Testing, Selection
Orch.Estab.
Orchard Development Seed Nursery
12 yr 2 yr8-10 yr2 yr 1 yr
2019 2031 2043 2046
Genomic Prediction/MAS
QCFingerprinting
QCPurity Testing
-
8
Objectives for ArborGen genomics
Examine variation and marker-trait relationships with genomic approaches in ArborGen’s populations of loblolly pine.
• Develop a SNP resource• Explore Genomic Selection (GS)• Develop and evaluate Marker Assisted Selection (MAS)
opportunities• Pilot scale MAS deployment• Implement DNA fingerprinting to correct errors
-
9
Where to apply genomic technology?
Test
Select
Breed
Test
Select
Breed
Test
Select
Breed
1st
2nd
3rd
Population Improvement Deployment
Elite Parents Superior crosses & varietals
Marker Assisted Selection
Marker Assisted Selection
Marker Assisted Selection
Genomic Selection
Genomic Selection
-
10
SNP Resource Development
• Consortium Axiom 50K SNP array now available• Custom 220 SNP AgriSeq panel for fingerprinting/QC
SNP Discovery
• Internal SNP discovery
• Internal populations
• 320K SNPs
Addition of public SNPs
• PINEMAP (200K SNPs)
• UCD – Neale Lab (10K SNPs)
Axiom Screening Array
• 192 genotypes
• Parents representing 5 populations
• 360K SNPs
Axiom 50K Array
• 3 populations• 2
provenances• 25-30K SNPs
in each population
0
200
400
600
1 88 175
262
349
436
523
610
697
784
871
958
1045
1132
1219
1306
1393
1480
1567
1654
1741
DNA Conc. (ng/uL)
99% sample success
-
11
Coastal Varietal Population & Experimental Design
• 3938 varieties (somatic embryogenesis)• 63 Full-sib families from 23 parents• Varieties within families: 1 to 225• 78 trials in 24 series• Experimental designs: Row-column, RCB• Established in the field: 2001 – 2013• Common checklots: 2-4 across all trials• Pedigree connections across series• Number of crosses & varieties within
cross varied by company
-
12
Varietals are produced through somatic embryogenesis
-
13
Preparing the analysis
• 1920 samples genotyped out of 3938 in the dataset• 1572 genotypes kept in the analysis
• Incorrect pedigree, planned duplicates, unplanned duplicates• H-BLUP performed for all traits in ASReml• 𝑌𝑌𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 = 𝜇𝜇 + 𝑆𝑆𝑖𝑖 + 𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑖 𝑖𝑖 + 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑖𝑖 + 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑖𝑖 + 𝑠𝑠𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 + 𝑔𝑔𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑖𝑖 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 + 𝑆𝑆 × 𝑔𝑔𝑟𝑟𝑐𝑐𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 +
𝑆𝑆 × 𝑔𝑔𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖(𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖) + 𝑟𝑟 × 𝑔𝑔𝑟𝑟𝑐𝑐𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑖 𝑖𝑖 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 + 𝑐𝑐𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖• Individual predictions were deregressed for SNP analysis
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
Height DBH Volume Rust Straightness Forking
h2 H2
-
14
Markers selection for MAS
Trait # Significant SNPsCorrelation True-
Predicted Comment
Height 201 0.81 58 SNPs in common Ht, DBH, VolDBH 103 0.76
Volume 327 0.83
Rust 63 0.84 3 large effect SNPs
Straightness 147 0.89
Forking 300 0.90
• MAS models developed from varietal population can be applied to families including the same parents.• Screen new varieties from the same parents• Screen seedlings from MCP families for RC production
-
15
Marker Assisted SelectionPredictions for volume within specific families• The population was subsampled 10 times for cross-validation
• Each run had 30 varieties removed by random selection.• Model was generated on 1523 samples
Model results for 1553 individuals included in the analysis (no missing data)
r = 0.824
SNPs screened using BayesCpi model and selected based on probability of inclusion. Selected subset of SNPs then run in Bayesian LASSO (GS3)
-
16
Subsampling Results
Sampling Run r
1 0.815
2 0.894
3 0.836
4 0.737
5 0.638
6 0.773
7 0.863
8 0.972
9 0.858
10 0.852
Mean 0.824
Std Dev 0.087
Correlations ranged from 0.638 up to 0.97 with random sampling, but the average of the 10 runs is nearly identical to the correlation from the whole population true vs predicted results with no missing data.
R = 0.97
R = 0.85R = 0.63
R = 0.81
-
17
Application of MAS • Less than 5% of varieties move forward in
testing pipeline.• Pre-screen untested trees
• Genotype larger sets of varietals in the lab prior to field trials
• Develop cost-effective low-density SNP arrays to screen more individuals
• Reduce testing footprint and costs • Test fewer genotypes across more sites
-
18
Improving fusiform rust resistance
Phenotypes scored
Resistance marker “CC” = 11%
Susceptible marker “CT” = 57%
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
1
110
921
732
543
354
164
975
786
597
310
8111
8912
9714
0515
1316
2117
2918
3719
4520
5321
6122
6923
7724
8525
9327
0128
0929
1730
2531
3332
41
Baye
sCp
post
erio
r pro
babi
lity
SNP Marker
DominantSNP AdditiveSNP
Seed from 2 families was sent to the USDA Forest Service Resistance Screening Center
Chart1
CCL123x1
CTL123x1
CCL127x1
CTL127x1
CCL73x1
CTL73x1
CCL77x1
CTL77x1
CCL9 &103x1
CTL9 &103x1
CCL9 &107x1
CTL9 &107x1
Coastal South Carolina Inocula
Lower Gulf Coastal Plain
S Georgia/ N Florida
Mean
% Rust Incidence
0.0701754
0.5901639
0.1111111
0.6857143
0.1481481
0.530303
0.1176471
0.5294118
0.1071429
0.453125
0.1176471
0.6470588
Sheet1
Analysis Variable : Gall2
RSC-CodeInoculumSNPN ObsNMeanStd DevMinimumMaximum
M-5273x1L12CC57577%0.257713101
M-5273x1L12CT616159%0.495884701
M-5287x1L12CC363611%0.318727601
M-5287x1L12CT353569%0.471008201
M-5273x1L7CC545415%0.358582501
M-5273x1L7CT666653%0.502905301
M-5287x1L7CC686812%0.324585201
M-5287x1L7CT515153%0.504100801
M-5273x1L9 &10CC565611%0.312093901
M-5273x1L9 &10CT646445%0.501733101
M-5287x1L9 &10CC515112%0.325395701
M-5287x1L9 &10CT686865%0.481437701
3x1
Sheet1
Mean
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
19
Establishing pilot plantations of marker-selected rust resistant seedlings
In the states of AL, FL, GA, MS, NC, & SC: 78% of the counties are at a 30% rust hazard or higher
Pilot plantations established Winter 2019
-
20
Pedigree & Identity Corrections
14%
2%
• In this population there were 913 varieties genotyped.• We found 124 errors where family relationships did not match up.• We were able to correct all but 19 samples with the markers.
-
21
Orchard DNA fingerprinting
192 SNP markers used to compare tree samples
2 Genotypes with the same name – Orchard staff noticed morphological & phenologicaldifferences
A grafted seed orchard ramet has a lifespan of 25+ years for seed productionExample 1 Example 2
-
22
Summary
• Prediction models for marker assisted selection approaches using varietal populations to predict within families show promise. • Cross validation efforts suggest the ability to prescreen and
select before field trials• Successful identification of SNPs associated with fusiform rust
resistance• Application of fingerprinting has allowed corrections in seed
orchards at establishment - very valuable!• Near term opportunity to pre-screen trees in progeny trials• May require a change in the seed production pipeline to capture
gain and value
-
23
Thank You
AcknowledgementsRoss Whetten, NCSCarol Loopstra, TAM
ArborGen:Chris JudyDavid Brown Hugo Palm-Leis Robert Moore Jimmy SeckingerChris RosierChristina CannistraJay CokeLes PearsonBernard FrazierJohn Mills
Thermo Fisher Scientific and its affiliates are not endorsing, recommending, or promoting any use or application o Thermo Fisher Scientific products presented by third parties during this seminar. Information and materials presented or provided by third parties are provided as-is and without warranty of any kind, including regarding intellectual property rights and reported results. Parties presenting images, text and material represent they have the rights to do so.
Applying genomic tools to loblolly pine �Adding value to our germplasm and our products���W. Patrick Cumbie, Dudley A. Huber, Salvador Gezan, Victor Steel, and Michael Cunningham��January 13, 2020Slide Number 2ArborGen Nursery PlatformsThree Major Categories of Loblolly Genetics TodayMCP® Production�Over 900K pollination bags installed in 2019�What type of tree do we seek?Why pursue genomic prediction?Objectives for ArborGen genomicsWhere to apply genomic technology?SNP Resource DevelopmentCoastal Varietal Population & Experimental DesignVarietals are produced through somatic embryogenesisPreparing the analysisMarkers selection for MASMarker Assisted Selection�Predictions for volume within specific familiesSubsampling ResultsApplication of MAS Improving fusiform rust resistanceEstablishing pilot plantations of marker-selected rust resistant seedlingsPedigree & Identity CorrectionsOrchard DNA fingerprintingSummarySlide Number 23