Application of selective breeding to oyster restoration: A ... · Photo by L. Degremont Two...

25
Application of selective breeding to oyster restoration: A unique strategy of genetic “rehabilitation” in the Chesapeake Bay S. K. Allen Jr. and L. Degremont Aquaculture Genetics and Breeding Technology Center Virginia Institute of Marine Science Photo by L. Degremont Do not disseminate without author authorization

Transcript of Application of selective breeding to oyster restoration: A ... · Photo by L. Degremont Two...

Application of selective breeding to oyster restoration: A unique strategy of genetic “rehabilitation”

in the Chesapeake Bay

S. K. Allen Jr. and L. DegremontAquaculture Genetics and Breeding Technology Center

Virginia Institute of Marine Science

Photo by L. DegremontDo n

ot dis

semina

te with

out a

uthor

autho

rizati

on

Application of selective breeding to oyster restoration: A unique strategy of genetic “rehabilitation”

in the Chesapeake Bay

• desperate

• foolproof

• foolhardy

• hijacked

• default

Photo by L. DegremontDo n

ot dis

semina

te with

out a

uthor

autho

rizati

on

Forces of selection onChesapeake Bay oyster populations

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

1880

1885

1890

1895

1900

1905

1910

1915

1920

1925

1930

1935

1940

1945

1951

1956

1961

1966

1971

1976

1981

1986

1991

1996

2001

2007

2012

Fisheries selectionFisheries selection

Genetic rehabilitation?Genetic rehabilitation?

Natural selectionNatural selection

MSX Dermo

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

Baylor Survey: oyster groundsBaylor Survey: oyster grounds

1892 survey of most productive oyster

grounds in Virginia

Yield of oysters from the Bay, nearly 8

million bushels/ year

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

Baylor Survey: oyster groundsBaylor Survey: oyster grounds

Age class structure

Fecundity

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

1880

1885

1890

1895

1900

1905

1910

1915

1920

1925

1930

1935

1940

1945

1951

1956

1961

1966

1971

1976

1981

1986

1991

1996

2001

2007

2012

Natural selectionNatural selection

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

Baylor Survey: oyster groundsBaylor Survey: oyster grounds

Age class structure

Fecundity

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

1880

1885

1890

1895

1900

1905

1910

1915

1920

1925

1930

1935

1940

1945

1951

1956

1961

1966

1971

1976

1981

1986

1991

1996

2001

2007

2012

Natural selectionNatural selection

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

Baylor Survey: oyster groundsBaylor Survey: oyster grounds

Age class structure

Fecundity

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

1880

1885

1890

1895

1900

1905

1910

1915

1920

1925

1930

1935

1940

1945

1951

1956

1961

1966

1971

1976

1981

1986

1991

1996

2001

2007

2012

Fisheries selectionFisheries selection

barriers to gene flow?

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

Baylor Survey: oyster groundsBaylor Survey: oyster grounds

Age class structure

Fecundity

fish out

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

1880

1885

1890

1895

1900

1905

1910

1915

1920

1925

1930

1935

1940

1945

1951

1956

1961

1966

1971

1976

1981

1986

1991

1996

2001

2007

2012

Fisheries selectionFisheries selection

barriers to gene flow?

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

Baylor Survey: oyster groundsBaylor Survey: oyster grounds

Age class structure

Fecundity

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

1880

1885

1890

1895

1900

1905

1910

1915

1920

1925

1930

1935

1940

1945

1951

1956

1961

1966

1971

1976

1981

1986

1991

1996

2001

2007

2012

Fisheries selectionFisheries selection

barriers to gene flow?

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

Baylor Survey: oyster groundsBaylor Survey: oyster grounds

fish out

Fisheries selectionFisheries selection

retain

resistance

Artificial selectionArtificial selection

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

1880

1885

1890

1895

1900

1905

1910

1915

1920

1925

1930

1935

1940

1945

1951

1956

1961

1966

1971

1976

1981

1986

1991

1996

2001

2007

2012

Genetic Genetic

rehabilitation?rehabilitation?

barriers to gene flow?

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

Recommendations: Release / genetic rehabilitation strategy

• Limit release to restricted embayments

• Assess release strategies with use of

molecular markers

• Use multiple releases in one system

• Use more than one system

• Use multiple stocks among systems

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

Application of selective breeding to oyster restoration: A unique strategy of genetic “rehabilitation”

in the Chesapeake Bay

the hijacking

Photo by L. DegremontDo n

ot dis

semina

te with

out a

uthor

autho

rizati

on

XB line

DBY line

tetraploid

6th generation DBY line

two years old

80% survival

10x increase in seed orders

4XDXB x CDBY: triploid DR aquaculture strain

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

RESTORATION vs. AQUACULTURERESTORATION vs. AQUACULTURE

base population

aquaculture and domestication

diminished diversity

“wild-type” genotypes

natural populations

maintain genetic variation

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

Photo by L. Degremont

Two complementary approaches to selection for disease resistance using C. virginica

Line (variety) development

Family selection

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

9 lines

7 replicates

4 sites

Line (variety) development

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

Kinsale

York River

WachapreagueChesapeake

Bay

Atlantic

Ocean

Lynnhaven

Line (variety) development

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

Kinsale

0

5

10

15

20

YOBOY

04

CDBY

04

AXB 04 CAMX

04

ZDMO

04

MBC 04 XDBLA

04

ZDXB

04

YLGT

04

(%)

Mo

rtali

ty

York River

0

10

20

30

40

50

YOBOY

04

AXB 04 YLGT

04

CAMX

04

XDBLA

04

CDBY

04

MBC 04 ZDXB

04

ZDMO

04

(%) M

ort

ality

Broad bay

0

10

20

30

YOBOY

04

AXB 04 MBC 04 ZDXB

04

CDBY

04

ZDMO

04

CAMX

04

YLGT

04

XDBLA

04

(%)

Mo

rta

lity

Burton's Bay

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

ZDMO

04

XDBLA

04

YOBOY

04

MBC 04 ZDXB

04

YLGT

04

CAMX

04

CDBY

04

AXB 04

(%)

Mo

rtality

Line (variety) development

~10 ppt ~18 ppt

~28 ppt ~32 ppt

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

Family selection

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

>1600 replicates of 200 oysters each

>300,000 single oysters

50 families/ year

8 replicates

2 sites

Family selection

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

MODUS OPERANDI: Disease resistant varieties

VIMS hatchery

also hold brood stock

for distribution

commercial

hatchery

lines and families for

field tests, selection

lines

families

oyster restoration

commercial aquaculture

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

Disease resistant varieties on restored reefs

Restoration hijacked the aquaculture lines

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

IDEAL vs. REALITYIDEAL vs. REALITY

base population

“wild-type” genotypes

natural populations

maintain genetic variation

wild stocks

mixture of DR strains

locally adapted

all the above

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation

Thanks to Tommy Leggett for pants

Photo by L. DegremontDo n

ot dis

semina

te with

out a

uthor

autho

rizati

on

Banquet. n. From the Celtic ban (or bread) and

quetta (to lead on or tease).

A ritual of proffering small amounts of bread or

food for the purpose of exciting the palette.

Especially popular in northwest regions of Europe.

Do not

disse

minate

withou

t auth

or au

thoriz

ation