Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame- Acoustic Interactions...
-
Upload
marshall-mccormick -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
4
Transcript of Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame- Acoustic Interactions...
Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling
Multidimensional Flame-Acoustic Interactions
Tim Lieuwen and Ben T. ZinnDepts. Of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlanta, GA 30318
20th World Conference on the Boundary Element MethodOrlando, Fl., Aug. 19-22, 1998
Flame - Acoustic Interactions
Combustion Noise Pulse Combustors Combustion Instabilities
F lam eA coustic D istu rbances
F u e l + A ir
Flame - Acoustic Interactions
Visualization taken with Mr. Hector Torres
7
3
1
5
75
3
1
1
Premixed Fuel+Air
P’
time
Goal of Study
Develop relatively simple tool capable of semi-quantitative analysis of flame acoustic interactions
Develop insight to suggest simplifications for analytical approaches to problem
Approach
Noting that in typical systems– Discrepancy between acoustic and flame length scales
• Acoustic Wavelength ~ 1 m
• Flame Thickness ~ 0.1- 1 mm
– Mach Numbers typically low• e.g. gas turbine combustors, M~0.04
– Nearly Isothermal flow except for rapid heating near flame
Approach
0'pk'p 2c
2 0'pk'p 2h
2 0)'p()'p(
'q)p/)1(()'u()'u(
F la m e
R e g io n o f M u ltid im e n s io n a lA c o u st ic M o tio n s
H o t C o m b u stio nP ro d u cts
C o ldR e a c ta n ts
In c id e n tW a v e
R e fle c te dW a v e
Tra n sm itte dW a v e
Solve Wave E qn . In “C old” R eg ion
U sing B E M
Solve Wave E qn . In “H ot” R eg ion
U sing B E M
M atch So lutions A cross flam e R eg ion
0'pk'p 2c
2 0'pk'p 2h
2 0)'p()'p(
'q)p/)1(()'u()'u(
M o m e n tu m B ala n ce
E n erg y B alan ce :
Results
No flame response to perturbations
Results
With Flame Response to Perturbations
Results
Ratio of transverse and axial velocity component over the flame surface
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1x/Lflame
|Vy|
/|V
x|
Area Discontinuity and Flame(i.e., temperature jump)
Area Discontinuity (No Flame)
Results
Comparison of magnitude of the acoustic pressure along the combustor wall and flame surface
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
1.05
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
X/Lflame
No
rmal
ized
Pre
ssu
re A
mp
litu
de
With Oscillating Heat Release
Passive Flame
Pressure at flame surface
Pressure along combustor wall
Conclusions
Acoustic velocity field near flame two dimensional
Acoustic pressure reasonably one dimensional
BEM methods useful tool for modeling flame acoustic interactions
Future Work
Flame Dynamics Mean Flow Effects
– May be significant in determining energy flux
Time Domain Formulation– Linear Acoustics / Nonlinear Flame
Dynamics