Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame- Acoustic Interactions...

12
Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame-Acoustic Interactions Tim Lieuwen and Ben T. Zinn Depts. Of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30318 20th World Conference on the Boundary Element Method Orlando, Fl., Aug. 19-22, 1998

Transcript of Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame- Acoustic Interactions...

Page 1: Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame- Acoustic Interactions Tim Lieuwen and Ben T. Zinn Depts. Of Mechanical and.

Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling

Multidimensional Flame-Acoustic Interactions

Tim Lieuwen and Ben T. ZinnDepts. Of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlanta, GA 30318

20th World Conference on the Boundary Element MethodOrlando, Fl., Aug. 19-22, 1998

Page 2: Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame- Acoustic Interactions Tim Lieuwen and Ben T. Zinn Depts. Of Mechanical and.

Flame - Acoustic Interactions

Combustion Noise Pulse Combustors Combustion Instabilities

F lam eA coustic D istu rbances

F u e l + A ir

Page 3: Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame- Acoustic Interactions Tim Lieuwen and Ben T. Zinn Depts. Of Mechanical and.

Flame - Acoustic Interactions

Visualization taken with Mr. Hector Torres

7

3

1

5

75

3

1

1

Premixed Fuel+Air

P’

time

Page 4: Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame- Acoustic Interactions Tim Lieuwen and Ben T. Zinn Depts. Of Mechanical and.

Goal of Study

Develop relatively simple tool capable of semi-quantitative analysis of flame acoustic interactions

Develop insight to suggest simplifications for analytical approaches to problem

Page 5: Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame- Acoustic Interactions Tim Lieuwen and Ben T. Zinn Depts. Of Mechanical and.

Approach

Noting that in typical systems– Discrepancy between acoustic and flame length scales

• Acoustic Wavelength ~ 1 m

• Flame Thickness ~ 0.1- 1 mm

– Mach Numbers typically low• e.g. gas turbine combustors, M~0.04

– Nearly Isothermal flow except for rapid heating near flame

Page 6: Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame- Acoustic Interactions Tim Lieuwen and Ben T. Zinn Depts. Of Mechanical and.

Approach

0'pk'p 2c

2 0'pk'p 2h

2 0)'p()'p(

'q)p/)1(()'u()'u(

F la m e

R e g io n o f M u ltid im e n s io n a lA c o u st ic M o tio n s

H o t C o m b u stio nP ro d u cts

C o ldR e a c ta n ts

In c id e n tW a v e

R e fle c te dW a v e

Tra n sm itte dW a v e

Solve Wave E qn . In “C old” R eg ion

U sing B E M

Solve Wave E qn . In “H ot” R eg ion

U sing B E M

M atch So lutions A cross flam e R eg ion

0'pk'p 2c

2 0'pk'p 2h

2 0)'p()'p(

'q)p/)1(()'u()'u(

M o m e n tu m B ala n ce

E n erg y B alan ce :

Page 7: Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame- Acoustic Interactions Tim Lieuwen and Ben T. Zinn Depts. Of Mechanical and.

Results

No flame response to perturbations

Page 8: Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame- Acoustic Interactions Tim Lieuwen and Ben T. Zinn Depts. Of Mechanical and.

Results

With Flame Response to Perturbations

Page 9: Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame- Acoustic Interactions Tim Lieuwen and Ben T. Zinn Depts. Of Mechanical and.

Results

Ratio of transverse and axial velocity component over the flame surface

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1x/Lflame

|Vy|

/|V

x|

Area Discontinuity and Flame(i.e., temperature jump)

Area Discontinuity (No Flame)

Page 10: Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame- Acoustic Interactions Tim Lieuwen and Ben T. Zinn Depts. Of Mechanical and.

Results

Comparison of magnitude of the acoustic pressure along the combustor wall and flame surface

0.6

0.65

0.7

0.75

0.8

0.85

0.9

0.95

1

1.05

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

X/Lflame

No

rmal

ized

Pre

ssu

re A

mp

litu

de

With Oscillating Heat Release

Passive Flame

Pressure at flame surface

Pressure along combustor wall

Page 11: Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame- Acoustic Interactions Tim Lieuwen and Ben T. Zinn Depts. Of Mechanical and.

Conclusions

Acoustic velocity field near flame two dimensional

Acoustic pressure reasonably one dimensional

BEM methods useful tool for modeling flame acoustic interactions

Page 12: Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame- Acoustic Interactions Tim Lieuwen and Ben T. Zinn Depts. Of Mechanical and.

Future Work

Flame Dynamics Mean Flow Effects

– May be significant in determining energy flux

Time Domain Formulation– Linear Acoustics / Nonlinear Flame

Dynamics