APPENDIX VI-1 Trip Generation Tables for Alternative Projects...Lomita Boulevard PM 1.117 F 1.195 F...

46
APPENDIX VI-1 Trip Generation Tables for Alternative Projects

Transcript of APPENDIX VI-1 Trip Generation Tables for Alternative Projects...Lomita Boulevard PM 1.117 F 1.195 F...

  • APPENDIX VI-1 Trip Generation Tables for

    Alternative Projects

  • Table A-1WEEKDAY ALTERNATIVE "A" TRIP GENERATION [1]

    DAILY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOURTRIP ENDS [2] VOLUMES [2] VOLUMES [2]

    LAND USE SIZE VOLUMES IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL

    Single Family Detached Housin 429 DU 4,106 81 241 322 273 160 433

    TOTAL PROJECT 4,106 81 241 322 273 160 433

    [1] Source: ITE "Trip Generation", 7th Edition, 2003.[2] Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving.[3] ITE Land Use Code 210 (Single Family Detached Housing) weekday trip generation average rates.

  • Table A-2SATURDAY ALTERNATIVE "A" TRIP GENERATION [1]

    DAILY PEAK HOURTRIP ENDS [2] VOLUMES [2]

    LAND USE SIZE VOLUMES IN OUT TOTAL

    Single Family Detached Housing [3 429 DU 4,333 218 185 403

    TOTAL PROJECT 4,333 218 185 403

    [1] Source: ITE "Trip Generation", 7th Edition, 2003.[2] Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving.[3] ITE Land Use Code 210 (Single Family Detached Housing) Saturday trip generation average ra

  • Table A-3SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE A

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE YEAR 2012YEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT PRE-PROJECT WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. W/ PROJECT CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH W/ MARY STAR [a] ALTERNATIVE A V/C IMPACT MITIGATION V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4)-(3)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)]

    1 Hawthorne Boulevard/ AM 1.024 F 1.095 F 1.172 F 1.173 F 0.001 NO 1.173 F 0.001 ---Sepulveda Boulevard PM 1.104 F 1.181 F 1.275 F 1.276 F 0.001 NO 1.276 F 0.001 ---

    2 Hawthorne Boulevard/ AM 0.963 E 1.030 F 1.107 F 1.110 F 0.003 NO 1.110 F 0.003 ---Pacific Coast Highway PM 1.202 F 1.286 F 1.378 F 1.382 F 0.004 NO 1.382 F 0.004 ---

    3 Hawthorne Boulevard/ AM 0.873 D 0.934 E 0.989 E 0.991 E 0.002 NO 0.991 E 0.002 ---Palos Verdes Drive North PM 0.817 D 0.874 D 0.942 E 0.944 E 0.002 NO 0.944 E 0.002 ---

    4 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.907 E 0.970 E 1.097 F 1.097 F 0.000 NO 1.097 F 0.000 ---Sepulveda Boulevard PM 0.966 E 1.033 F 1.143 F 1.143 F 0.000 NO 1.143 F 0.000 ---

    5 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.927 E 0.992 E 1.066 F 1.068 F 0.002 NO 1.068 F 0.002 ---Lomita Boulevard PM 1.117 F 1.195 F 1.296 F 1.298 F 0.002 NO 1.298 F 0.002 ---

    6 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.988 E 1.057 F 1.135 F 1.137 F 0.002 NO 1.137 F 0.002 ---Pacific Coast Highway PM 1.070 F 1.145 F 1.264 F 1.270 F 0.006 NO 1.270 F 0.006 ---

    7 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.776 C 0.830 D 0.877 D 0.886 D 0.009 NO 0.886 D 0.009 ---Palos Verdes Drive North PM 0.713 C 0.763 C 0.835 D 0.844 D 0.009 NO 0.844 D 0.009 ---

    8 Arlington Avenue/ AM 0.896 D 0.959 E 0.994 E 0.996 E 0.002 NO 0.996 E 0.002 ---Lomita Boulevard PM 0.989 E 1.059 F 1.109 F 1.112 F 0.003 NO 1.112 F 0.003 ---

    [a] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Taper Avenue. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c

    > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040> 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020

    > 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010

    Run LOS

    Print

  • Table A-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE A

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE YEAR 2012YEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT PRE-PROJECT WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. W/ PROJECT CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH W/ MARY STAR [a] ALTERNATIVE A V/C IMPACT MITIGATION V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4)-(3)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)]

    9 Narbonne Avenue/ AM 0.892 D 0.955 E 1.035 F 1.038 F 0.003 NO 1.038 F 0.003 ---Pacific Coast Highway PM 0.793 C 0.848 D 0.932 E 0.934 E 0.002 NO 0.934 E 0.002 ---

    10 Palos Verdes Drive East/ AM 0.777 C 0.831 D 0.919 E 0.923 E 0.004 NO 0.923 E 0.004 ---Palos Verdes Drive North PM 0.688 B 0.736 C 0.785 C 0.794 C 0.009 NO 0.794 C 0.009 ---

    11 Western Avenue/ AM 0.829 D 0.892 D 1.013 F 1.016 F 0.003 NO 1.016 F 0.003 ---Sepulveda Boulevard [b] PM 0.945 E 1.016 F 1.157 F 1.163 F 0.006 NO 1.163 F 0.006 ---

    12 Western Avenue/ AM 0.982 E 1.051 F 1.157 F 1.164 F 0.007 NO 1.064 F -0.093 ---Lomita Boulevard PM 1.106 F 1.184 F 1.349 F 1.366 F 0.017 YES 1.266 F -0.083 YES

    13 Western Avenue/ AM 0.903 E 0.941 E 1.088 F 1.097 F 0.009 NO 1.088 F 0.000 ---Pacific Coast Highway [c] PM 0.969 E 1.012 F 1.216 F 1.247 F 0.031 YES 1.173 F -0.043 YES

    14 Western Avenue/ AM 0.607 B 0.650 B 0.770 C 0.790 C 0.020 NO 0.790 C 0.020 ---Anaheim Street PM 0.545 A 0.583 A 0.699 B 0.712 C 0.013 NO 0.712 C 0.013 ---

    15 Western Avenue/ AM 1.031 F 1.103 F 1.322 F 1.397 F 0.075 YES 1.179 F -0.143 YESPalos Verdes Drive North PM 1.025 F 1.097 F 1.155 F 1.265 F 0.110 YES 1.030 F -0.125 YES

    SAT 0.845 D 0.904 E 0.980 E 1.084 F 0.104 YES 0.870 D -0.110 YES

    16 Western Avenue/ AM 0.582 A 0.623 B 0.713 C 0.772 C 0.059 YES 0.672 B -0.041 YESSenior Housing Project Access PM 0.527 A 0.564 A 0.662 B 0.706 C 0.044 YES 0.606 B -0.056 YES

    SAT 0.605 B 0.648 B 0.753 C 0.829 D 0.076 YES 0.721 C -0.032 YES

    [a] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Taper Avenue. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[c] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. In the future, the intersection will operate under the ATSAC/ATCS system. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040

    > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020> 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010

  • Table A-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE A

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE YEAR 2012YEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT PRE-PROJECT WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. W/ PROJECT CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH W/ MARY STAR [a] ALTERNATIVE A V/C IMPACT MITIGATION V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4)-(3)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)]

    17 Western Avenue/ AM n/a n/a n/a 0.786 C n/a 0.686 B n/aMain Project Access [d] PM n/a n/a n/a 0.662 B n/a 0.562 A n/a

    SAT n/a n/a n/a 0.737 C n/a 0.637 B n/a

    18 Western Avenue/ AM 0.762 C 0.816 D 0.908 E 0.966 E 0.058 YES 0.866 D -0.042 YESAvenida Aprenda- PM 0.543 A 0.581 A 0.687 B 0.739 C 0.052 YES 0.639 B -0.048 YESSoutherly Project Access SAT 0.569 A 0.609 B 0.722 C 0.778 C 0.056 YES 0.678 B -0.044 YES

    19 Western Avenue/ AM 0.884 D 0.946 E 1.109 F 1.134 F 0.025 YES 1.034 F -0.075 YESWestmont Drive PM 0.873 D 0.934 E 1.033 F 1.065 F 0.032 YES 0.965 E -0.068 YES

    SAT 0.832 D 0.890 D 1.013 F 1.043 F 0.030 YES 0.943 E -0.070 YES

    20 Western Avenue/ AM 0.793 C 0.849 D 0.938 E 0.943 E 0.005 NO 0.943 E 0.005 ---Toscanini Drive PM 0.737 C 0.789 C 0.931 E 0.937 E 0.006 NO 0.937 E 0.006 ---

    SAT 0.637 B 0.681 B 0.861 D 0.869 D 0.008 NO 0.869 D 0.008 ---

    21 Western Avenue/ AM 0.598 A 0.640 B 0.718 C 0.728 C 0.010 NO 0.628 B -0.090 ---Caddington Drive PM 0.721 C 0.772 C 0.859 D 0.890 D 0.031 YES 0.790 C -0.069 YES

    SAT 0.751 C 0.804 D 0.929 E 0.954 E 0.025 YES 0.854 D -0.075 YES

    22 Western Avenue/ AM 0.940 E 1.005 F 1.102 F 1.107 F 0.005 NO 1.007 F -0.095 ---Capitol Drive PM 0.898 D 0.961 E 1.138 F 1.152 F 0.014 YES 1.052 F -0.086 YES

    SAT 0.969 E 1.037 F 1.296 F 1.308 F 0.012 YES 1.208 F -0.088 YES

    [a] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Taper Avenue. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[d] This intersection will be created as part of the proposed project. A new traffic signal will be proposed at the Western Avenue/Main Project Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c

    Access intersection. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040> 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020

    > 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010

  • Table A-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE A

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE YEAR 2012YEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT PRE-PROJECT WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. W/ PROJECT CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH W/ MARY STAR [a] ALTERNATIVE A V/C IMPACT MITIGATION V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4)-(3)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)]

    23 Western Avenue/ AM 0.792 C 0.848 D 0.929 E 0.933 E 0.004 NO 0.833 D -0.096 ---Park Western Drive PM 0.629 B 0.673 B 0.793 C 0.805 D 0.012 NO 0.705 C -0.088 ---

    SAT 0.813 D 0.870 D 1.044 F 1.054 F 0.010 YES 0.954 E -0.090 YES

    24 Western Avenue/ AM 0.809 D 0.866 D 0.941 E 0.944 E 0.003 NO 0.944 E 0.003 ---Crestwood Street PM 0.520 A 0.556 A 0.661 B 0.665 B 0.004 NO 0.665 B 0.004 ---

    SAT 0.878 D 0.939 E 1.062 F 1.070 F 0.008 NO 1.070 F 0.008 ---

    25 Western Avenue/ AM 0.877 D 0.938 E 1.023 F 1.028 F 0.005 NO 0.928 E -0.095 ---Summerland Avenue PM 0.804 D 0.860 D 0.976 E 0.990 E 0.014 YES 0.890 D -0.086 YES

    SAT 0.760 C 0.813 D 0.958 E 0.970 E 0.012 YES 0.870 D -0.088 YES

    26 Western Avenue/ AM 0.951 E 1.023 F 1.127 F 1.130 F 0.003 NO 1.130 F 0.003 ---1st Street [b] PM 0.876 D 0.942 E 1.018 F 1.021 F 0.003 NO 1.021 F 0.003 ---

    SAT 0.721 C 0.776 C 0.931 E 0.936 E 0.005 NO 0.936 E 0.005 ---

    27 Western Avenue/ AM 0.582 A 0.635 B 0.689 B 0.693 B 0.004 NO 0.693 B 0.004 ---Weymouth Avenue [b] PM 0.563 A 0.607 B 0.690 B 0.695 B 0.005 NO 0.695 B 0.005 ---

    28 Western Avenue/ AM 0.465 A 0.503 A 0.532 A 0.533 A 0.001 NO 0.533 A 0.001 ---9th Street [b] PM 0.581 A 0.626 B 0.691 B 0.692 B 0.001 NO 0.692 B 0.001 ---

    29 Western Avenue/ AM 0.642 B 0.691 B 0.839 D 0.841 D 0.002 NO 0.841 D 0.002 ---25th Street PM 0.603 B 0.650 B 0.874 D 0.876 D 0.002 NO 0.876 D 0.002 ---

    [a] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Taper Avenue. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c

    > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040> 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020

    > 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010

  • Table A-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE A

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE YEAR 2012YEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT PRE-PROJECT WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. W/ PROJECT CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH W/ MARY STAR [a] ALTERNATIVE A V/C IMPACT MITIGATION V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4)-(3)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)]

    30 Weymouth Avenue/ AM 0.585 A 0.626 B 0.754 C 0.756 C 0.002 NO 0.756 C 0.002 ---9th Street PM 0.423 A 0.452 A 0.594 A 0.598 A 0.004 NO 0.598 A 0.004 ---

    31 Normandie Avenue/ AM 0.894 D 0.956 E 1.061 F 1.064 F 0.003 NO 1.064 F 0.003 ---Sepulveda Boulevard PM 0.851 D 0.911 E 1.028 F 1.031 F 0.003 NO 1.031 F 0.003 ---

    32 Normandie Avenue/ AM 0.849 D 0.909 E 0.935 E 0.937 E 0.002 NO 0.937 E 0.002 ---Lomita Boulevard PM 0.950 E 1.017 F 1.073 F 1.077 F 0.004 NO 1.077 F 0.004 ---

    33 Normandie Avenue/ AM 0.659 B 0.680 B 0.722 C 0.724 C 0.002 NO 0.724 C 0.002 ---Pacific Coast Highway [c] PM 0.682 B 0.705 C 0.777 C 0.783 C 0.006 NO 0.783 C 0.006 ---

    34 Vermont Avenue/ AM 0.631 B 0.676 B 0.705 C 0.716 C 0.011 NO 0.716 C 0.011 ---Normandie Avenue [e] PM 0.524 A 0.560 A 0.640 B 0.658 B 0.018 NO 0.658 B 0.018 ---

    35 Vermont Avenue- AM 0.833 D 0.892 D 0.950 E 0.967 E 0.017 YES 0.867 D -0.083 YESPalos Verdes Drive North- PM 0.884 D 0.945 E 1.069 F 1.100 F 0.031 YES 1.000 E -0.069 YESGaffey Street/Anaheim Street

    36 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.648 B 0.693 B 0.849 D 0.855 D 0.006 NO 0.755 C -0.094 ---Westmont Drive PM 0.797 C 0.853 D 0.983 E 1.009 F 0.026 YES 0.909 E -0.074 YES

    37 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.525 A 0.562 A 0.654 B 0.663 B 0.009 NO 0.663 B 0.009 ---Capitol Drive PM 0.739 C 0.790 C 0.923 E 0.928 E 0.005 NO 0.928 E 0.005 ---

    [a] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Taper Avenue. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[c] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. In the future, the intersection will operate under the ATSAC/ATCS system. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[e] Stop-controlled intersection on the minor approach. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040

    > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020> 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010

  • Table A-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE A

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE YEAR 2012YEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT PRE-PROJECT WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. W/ PROJECT CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH W/ MARY STAR [a] ALTERNATIVE A V/C IMPACT MITIGATION V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4)-(3)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)]

    38 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.765 C 0.823 D 0.910 E 0.918 E 0.008 NO 0.888 D -0.022 ---Miraflores Avenue- PM 0.751 C 0.809 D 0.966 E 0.983 E 0.017 YES 0.953 E -0.013 YESI-110 SB Ramps [b]

    39 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.803 D 0.864 D 0.992 E 0.999 E 0.007 NO 0.969 E -0.023 ---Summerland Avenue [b] PM 0.856 D 0.920 E 1.103 F 1.116 F 0.013 YES 1.086 F -0.017 YES

    40 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.528 A 0.570 A 0.781 C 0.784 C 0.003 NO 0.784 C 0.003 ---I-110 NB and SB Ramps [b] PM 0.887 D 0.954 E 1.277 F 1.279 F 0.002 NO 1.279 F 0.002 ---

    41 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.721 C 0.776 C 0.926 E 0.927 E 0.001 NO 0.927 E 0.001 ---9th Street [b] PM 0.767 C 0.825 D 1.046 F 1.048 F 0.002 NO 1.048 F 0.002 ---

    42 Vermont Avenue/ AM 0.914 E 0.978 E 1.068 F 1.071 F 0.003 NO 1.071 F 0.003 ---Sepulveda Boulevard PM 1.105 F 1.182 F 1.301 F 1.306 F 0.005 NO 1.306 F 0.005 ---

    43 Vermont Avenue/ AM 1.139 F 1.219 F 1.268 F 1.268 F 0.000 NO 1.268 F 0.000 ---Lomita Boulevard PM 0.965 E 1.032 F 1.077 F 1.081 F 0.004 NO 1.081 F 0.004 ---

    44 Vermont Avenue/ AM 0.682 B 0.705 C 0.748 C 0.760 C 0.012 NO 0.712 C -0.036 ---Pacific Coast Highway [c] PM 0.754 C 0.754 C 0.819 D 0.839 D 0.020 YES 0.773 C -0.046 YES

    45 Figueroa Street/ AM 0.741 C 0.793 C 0.889 D 0.890 D 0.001 NO 0.890 D 0.001 ---Sepulveda Boulevard PM 0.735 C 0.787 C 0.867 D 0.869 D 0.002 NO 0.869 D 0.002 ---

    [a] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Taper Avenue. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[c] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. In the future, the intersection will operate under the ATSAC/ATCS system. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040

    > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020> 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010

  • Table A-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE A

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE YEAR 2012YEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT PRE-PROJECT WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. W/ PROJECT CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH W/ MARY STAR [a] ALTERNATIVE A V/C IMPACT MITIGATION V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4)-(3)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)]

    46 Figueroa Street/ AM 0.825 D 0.882 D 0.918 E 0.929 E 0.011 YES 0.743 C -0.175 YESI-110 NB on-ramp [e] PM 0.841 D 0.900 D 0.937 E 0.944 E 0.007 NO 0.755 C -0.182 ---(north of PCH)

    47 I-110 SB Ramps/ AM 0.718 C 0.743 C 0.793 C 0.802 D 0.009 NO 0.802 D 0.009 ---Pacific Coast Highway [c] PM 0.842 D 0.876 D 0.983 E 0.985 E 0.002 NO 0.985 E 0.002 ---

    48 Figueroa Street/ AM 0.926 E 0.966 E 1.030 F 1.040 F 0.010 YES 0.985 E -0.045 YESPacific Coast Highway [c] PM 0.913 E 0.952 E 1.021 F 1.030 F 0.009 NO 0.975 E -0.046 ---

    49 Figueroa Place/ AM 0.502 A 0.537 A 0.579 A 0.587 A 0.008 NO 0.587 A 0.008 ---I-110 SB off-ramp [e] PM 0.622 B 0.665 B 0.696 B 0.714 C 0.018 NO 0.714 C 0.018 ---

    50 Figueroa Place/ AM 0.816 D 0.878 D 0.978 E 1.001 F 0.023 YES 0.936 E -0.042 YESAnaheim Street [b] PM 0.889 D 0.956 E 1.039 F 1.076 F 0.037 YES 0.929 E -0.110 YES

    51 Figueroa Street/ AM 1.213 F 1.297 F 1.376 F 1.410 F 0.034 YES 1.188 F -0.188 YESI-110 NB on-ramp [e] PM 0.780 C 0.835 D 0.910 E 0.932 E 0.022 YES 0.785 C -0.125 YES(north of Anaheim Street)

    52 Figueroa Street/ AM 0.845 D 0.909 E 0.972 E 0.992 E 0.020 YES 0.962 E -0.010 YESAnaheim Street [b] PM 0.822 D 0.884 D 0.968 E 0.976 E 0.008 NO 0.946 E -0.022 ---

    [a] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Taper Avenue. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[c] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. In the future, the intersection will operate under the ATSAC/ATCS system. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040[e] Stop-controlled intersection on the minor approach. > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020

    > 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010

  • Table B-1WEEKDAY ALTERNATIVE "B" TRIP GENERATION [1]

    DAILY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOURTRIP ENDS [2] VOLUMES [2] VOLUMES [2]

    LAND USE SIZE VOLUMES IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL

    ResidentialCondominiums [3] 1,150 DU 4,807 74 317 391 271 166 437

    Senior Housing [4] 1,150 DU 4,002 41 51 92 77 50 127

    Subtotal Residential Components 8,809 115 368 483 348 216 564

    Non-ResidentialBaseball Fields [5] 2 Fields 143 2 1 3 28 13 41

    Subtotal Non-Residential Components 143 2 1 3 28 13 41

    TOTAL PROJECT 8,952 117 369 486 376 229 605

    [1] Source: ITE "Trip Generation", 7th Edition, 2003.[2] Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving.[3] ITE Land Use Code 232 (High-Rise Residential Condominium/Townhouse) weekday trip generation average ra[4] ITE Land Use Code 252 (Senior Adult Housing - Attached) weekday trip generation average rates.[5] ITE Land Use Code 488 (Soccer Complex) weekday trip generation average rates.

  • Table B-2SATURDAY ALTERNATIVE "B" TRIP GENERATION [1]

    DAILY PEAK HOURTRIP ENDS [2] VOLUMES [2]

    LAND USE SIZE VOLUMES IN OUT TOTAL

    ResidentialCondominiums [3] 1,150 DU 4,957 173 230 403

    Senior Housing [4] 1,150 DU 2,887 173 172 345

    Subtotal Residential Components 7,844 346 402 748

    Non-ResidentialBaseball Fields [5] 2 Fields 235 27 30 57

    Subtotal Non-Residential Components 235 27 30 57

    TOTAL PROJECT 8,079 373 432 805

    [1] Source: ITE "Trip Generation", 7th Edition, 2003.[2] Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving.[3] ITE Land Use Code 232 (High-Rise Residential Condominium/Townhouse) Saturday

    trip generation average rates.[4] ITE Land Use Code 252 (Senior Adult Housing - Attached) Saturday trip generation

    average rates.[5] ITE Land Use Code 488 (Soccer Complex) Saturday trip generation average rates.

  • Table B-3SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE B

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4a] [4b] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE MITIGATION FORYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT FUTURE PRE-PROJECT CHANGE SIGNIF. WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. ALTERNATIVE B CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH PRE-PROJECT [a] W/ MARY STAR [b] V/C IMPACT ALTERNATIVE B V/C IMPACT AND MARY STAR V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4a)-(3)] V/C LOS [(4b)-(4a)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)] [c]

    1 Hawthorne Boulevard/ AM 1.024 F 1.095 F 1.172 F 1.172 F 0.000 NO 1.173 F 0.001 NO 1.173 F 0.001 ---Sepulveda Boulevard PM 1.104 F 1.181 F 1.275 F 1.275 F 0.000 NO 1.276 F 0.001 NO 1.276 F 0.001 ---

    2 Hawthorne Boulevard/ AM 0.963 E 1.030 F 1.107 F 1.107 F 0.000 NO 1.111 F 0.004 NO 1.111 F 0.004 ---Pacific Coast Highway PM 1.202 F 1.286 F 1.378 F 1.378 F 0.000 NO 1.382 F 0.004 NO 1.382 F 0.004 ---

    3 Hawthorne Boulevard/ AM 0.873 D 0.934 E 0.987 E 0.989 E 0.002 NO 0.993 E 0.004 NO 0.993 E 0.006 ---Palos Verdes Drive North PM 0.817 D 0.874 D 0.941 E 0.942 E 0.001 NO 0.944 E 0.002 NO 0.944 E 0.003 ---

    4 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.907 E 0.970 E 1.097 F 1.097 F 0.000 NO 1.097 F 0.000 NO 1.097 F 0.000 ---Sepulveda Boulevard PM 0.966 E 1.033 F 1.143 F 1.143 F 0.000 NO 1.143 F 0.000 NO 1.143 F 0.000 ---

    5 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.927 E 0.992 E 1.066 F 1.066 F 0.000 NO 1.070 F 0.004 NO 1.070 F 0.004 ---Lomita Boulevard PM 1.117 F 1.195 F 1.296 F 1.296 F 0.000 NO 1.298 F 0.002 NO 1.298 F 0.002 ---

    6 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.988 E 1.057 F 1.135 F 1.135 F 0.000 NO 1.137 F 0.002 NO 1.137 F 0.002 ---Pacific Coast Highway PM 1.070 F 1.145 F 1.264 F 1.264 F 0.000 NO 1.271 F 0.007 NO 1.271 F 0.007 ---

    7 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.776 C 0.830 D 0.877 D 0.877 D 0.000 NO 0.888 D 0.011 NO 0.888 D 0.011 ---Palos Verdes Drive North PM 0.713 C 0.763 C 0.835 D 0.835 D 0.000 NO 0.847 D 0.012 NO 0.847 D 0.012 ---

    8 Arlington Avenue/ AM 0.896 D 0.959 E 0.994 E 0.994 E 0.000 NO 0.998 E 0.004 NO 0.998 E 0.004 ---Lomita Boulevard PM 0.989 E 1.059 F 1.109 F 1.109 F 0.000 NO 1.113 F 0.004 NO 1.113 F 0.004 ---

    [a] The Mary Star by the Sea High School project is not included in this analysis. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Western Avenue. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[c] This column identifies the effectiveness of mitigation measures to be implemented by the project for both the Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School project. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040

    A "YES" indicates that the proposed mitigation measures will mitigate both Mary Star High School traffic and Ponte Vista traffic to less than significant levels. > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020> 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010

    Run LOS

    Print

  • Table B-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE B

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4a] [4b] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE MITIGATION FORYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT FUTURE PRE-PROJECT CHANGE SIGNIF. WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. ALTERNATIVE B CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH PRE-PROJECT [a] W/ MARY STAR [b] V/C IMPACT ALTERNATIVE B V/C IMPACT AND MARY STAR V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4a)-(3)] V/C LOS [(4b)-(4a)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)] [c]

    9 Narbonne Avenue/ AM 0.892 D 0.955 E 1.035 F 1.035 F 0.000 NO 1.040 F 0.005 NO 1.040 F 0.005 ---Pacific Coast Highway PM 0.793 C 0.848 D 0.932 E 0.932 E 0.000 NO 0.935 E 0.003 NO 0.935 E 0.003 ---

    10 Palos Verdes Drive East/ AM 0.777 C 0.831 D 0.913 E 0.919 E 0.006 NO 0.925 E 0.006 NO * 0.841 D -0.072 YESPalos Verdes Drive North PM 0.688 B 0.736 C 0.784 C 0.785 C 0.001 NO 0.797 C 0.012 NO 0.782 C -0.002 ---

    11 Western Avenue/ AM 0.829 D 0.892 D 1.013 F 1.013 F 0.000 NO 1.018 F 0.005 NO 1.018 F 0.005 ---Sepulveda Boulevard [d] PM 0.945 E 1.016 F 1.157 F 1.157 F 0.000 NO 1.163 F 0.006 NO 1.163 F 0.006 ---

    12 Western Avenue/ AM 0.982 E 1.051 F 1.155 F 1.157 F 0.002 NO 1.167 F 0.010 YES 1.067 F -0.088 YESLomita Boulevard PM 1.106 F 1.184 F 1.348 F 1.349 F 0.001 NO 1.371 F 0.022 YES 1.271 F -0.077 YES

    13 Western Avenue/ AM 0.903 E 0.941 E 1.082 F 1.088 F 0.006 NO 1.102 F 0.014 YES 1.035 F -0.047 YESPacific Coast Highway [e] PM 0.969 E 1.012 F 1.215 F 1.216 F 0.001 NO 1.259 F 0.043 YES 1.184 F -0.031 YES

    14 Western Avenue/ AM 0.607 B 0.650 B 0.765 C 0.771 C 0.006 NO 0.802 D 0.031 YES 0.702 C -0.063 YESAnaheim Street PM 0.545 A 0.583 A 0.697 B 0.699 B 0.002 NO 0.718 C 0.019 NO 0.618 B -0.079 ---

    15 Western Avenue/ AM 1.031 F 1.103 F 1.308 F 1.354 F 0.046 YES 1.466 F 0.112 YES 1.234 F -0.074 YESPalos Verdes Drive North PM 1.025 F 1.097 F 1.212 F 1.159 F -0.053 NO 1.304 F 0.145 YES 1.056 F -0.156 YES

    SAT 0.845 D 0.904 E 1.032 F 0.980 E -0.052 NO 1.173 F 0.193 YES 0.943 E -0.089 YES

    16 Western Avenue/ AM 0.582 A 0.623 B 0.701 C 0.721 C 0.020 NO 0.754 C 0.033 NO 0.654 B -0.047 ---Senior Housing Project Access PM 0.527 A 0.564 A 0.659 B 0.664 B 0.005 NO 0.736 C 0.072 YES 0.636 B -0.023 YES

    SAT 0.605 B 0.648 B 0.753 C 0.753 C 0.000 NO 0.881 D 0.128 YES 0.773 C 0.020 YES

    * While the respective individual impacts of the Mary Star High School project and the Ponte Vista project are less than significant, the study intersection would be significantly impacted by the combined Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School pr[a] The Mary Star by the Sea High School project is not included in this analysis. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Western Avenue. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[c] This column identifies the effectiveness of mitigation measures to be implemented by the project for both the Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School project. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040

    A "YES" indicates that the proposed mitigation measures will mitigate both Mary Star High School traffic and Ponte Vista traffic to less than significant levels. > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020[d] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. > 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010[e] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. In the future, the intersection will operate under the ATSAC/ATCS system.

  • Table B-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE B

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4a] [4b] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE MITIGATION FORYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT FUTURE PRE-PROJECT CHANGE SIGNIF. WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. ALTERNATIVE B CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH PRE-PROJECT [a] W/ MARY STAR [b] V/C IMPACT ALTERNATIVE B V/C IMPACT AND MARY STAR V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4a)-(3)] V/C LOS [(4b)-(4a)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)] [c]

    17 Western Avenue/ AM n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.827 D n/a 0.727 C n/a n/aMain Project Access [f] PM n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.674 B n/a 0.574 A n/a n/a

    SAT n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.831 D n/a 0.731 C n/a n/a

    18 Western Avenue/ AM 0.762 C 0.816 D 0.896 D 1.105 F 0.209 YES 1.107 F 0.002 NO 0.874 D -0.022 ---Avenida Aprenda- PM 0.543 A 0.581 A 0.684 B 0.709 C 0.025 NO 0.774 C 0.065 YES 0.644 B -0.040 YESSoutherly Project Access SAT 0.569 A 0.609 B 0.722 C 0.722 C 0.000 NO 0.814 D 0.092 YES 0.665 B -0.057 YES

    19 Western Avenue/ AM 0.884 D 0.946 E 1.030 F 1.104 F 0.074 YES 1.143 F 0.039 YES 0.981 E -0.049 YESWestmont Drive PM 0.873 D 0.934 E 1.019 F 1.037 F 0.018 YES 1.084 F 0.047 YES 0.959 E -0.060 YES

    SAT 0.832 D 0.890 D 1.013 F 1.013 F 0.000 NO 1.080 F 0.067 YES 0.946 E -0.067 YES

    20 Western Avenue/ AM 0.793 C 0.849 D 0.926 E 0.958 E 0.032 YES 0.966 E 0.008 NO 0.865 D -0.061 ---Toscanini Drive PM 0.737 C 0.789 C 0.929 E 0.935 E 0.006 NO 0.945 E 0.010 YES 0.846 D -0.083 YES

    SAT 0.637 B 0.681 B 0.861 D 0.861 D 0.000 NO 0.881 D 0.020 YES 0.781 C -0.080 YES

    21 Western Avenue/ AM 0.598 A 0.640 B 0.709 C 0.738 C 0.029 NO 0.746 C 0.008 NO 0.646 B -0.063 ---Caddington Drive PM 0.721 C 0.772 C 0.858 D 0.862 D 0.004 NO 0.889 D 0.027 YES 0.790 C -0.068 YES

    SAT 0.751 C 0.804 D 0.929 E 0.929 E 0.000 NO 0.956 E 0.027 YES 0.856 D -0.073 YES

    22 Western Avenue/ AM 0.940 E 1.005 F 1.093 F 1.125 F 0.032 YES 1.133 F 0.008 NO 1.034 F -0.059 ---Capitol Drive PM 0.898 D 0.961 E 1.137 F 1.143 F 0.006 NO 1.164 F 0.021 YES 1.065 F -0.072 YES

    SAT 0.969 E 1.037 F 1.296 F 1.296 F 0.000 NO 1.319 F 0.023 YES 1.219 F -0.077 YES

    [a] The Mary Star by the Sea High School project is not included in this analysis. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Western Avenue. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[c] This column identifies the effectiveness of mitigation measures to be implemented by the project for both the Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School project. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040

    A "YES" indicates that the proposed mitigation measures will mitigate both Mary Star High School traffic and Ponte Vista traffic to less than significant levels. > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020[f] This intersection will be created as part of the proposed project. A new traffic signal will be proposed at the Western Avenue/Main Project Access intersection. > 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010

  • Table B-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE B

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4a] [4b] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE MITIGATION FORYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT FUTURE PRE-PROJECT CHANGE SIGNIF. WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. ALTERNATIVE B CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH PRE-PROJECT [a] W/ MARY STAR [b] V/C IMPACT ALTERNATIVE B V/C IMPACT AND MARY STAR V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4a)-(3)] V/C LOS [(4b)-(4a)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)] [c]

    23 Western Avenue/ AM 0.792 C 0.848 D 0.923 E 0.938 E 0.015 YES 0.946 E 0.008 NO 0.846 D -0.077 ---Park Western Drive PM 0.629 B 0.673 B 0.792 C 0.794 C 0.002 NO 0.811 D 0.017 NO 0.711 C -0.081 ---

    SAT 0.813 D 0.870 D 1.044 F 1.044 F 0.000 NO 1.062 F 0.018 YES 0.962 E -0.082 YES

    24 Western Avenue/ AM 0.809 D 0.866 D 0.935 E 0.951 E 0.016 YES 0.955 E 0.004 NO 0.856 D -0.079 ---Crestwood Street PM 0.520 A 0.556 A 0.660 B 0.663 B 0.003 NO 0.668 B 0.005 NO 0.570 A -0.090 ---

    SAT 0.878 D 0.939 E 1.062 F 1.062 F 0.000 NO 1.076 F 0.014 YES 0.978 E -0.084 YES

    25 Western Avenue/ AM 0.877 D 0.938 E 1.018 F 1.051 F 0.033 YES 1.058 F 0.007 NO 0.958 E -0.060 ---Summerland Avenue PM 0.804 D 0.860 D 0.975 E 0.977 E 0.002 NO 0.996 E 0.019 YES 0.896 D -0.079 YES

    SAT 0.760 C 0.813 D 0.958 E 0.958 E 0.000 NO 0.981 E 0.023 YES 0.881 D -0.077 YES

    26 Western Avenue/ AM 0.951 E 1.023 F 1.122 F 1.127 F 0.005 NO 1.132 F 0.005 NO * 1.102 F -0.020 YES1st Street [d] PM 0.876 D 0.942 E 1.017 F 1.018 F 0.001 NO 1.023 F 0.005 NO 0.993 E -0.024 ---

    SAT 0.721 C 0.776 C 0.931 E 0.931 E 0.000 NO 0.939 E 0.008 NO 0.909 E -0.022 ---

    27 Western Avenue/ AM 0.582 A 0.635 B 0.684 B 0.689 B 0.005 NO 0.693 B 0.004 NO 0.694 B 0.010 ---Weymouth Avenue [d] PM 0.563 A 0.607 B 0.689 B 0.690 B 0.001 NO 0.697 B 0.007 NO 0.698 B 0.009 ---

    28 Western Avenue/ AM 0.465 A 0.503 A 0.527 A 0.532 A 0.005 NO 0.533 A 0.001 NO 0.533 A 0.006 ---9th Street [d] PM 0.581 A 0.626 B 0.690 B 0.691 B 0.001 NO 0.693 B 0.002 NO 0.693 B 0.003 ---

    29 Western Avenue/ AM 0.642 B 0.691 B 0.835 D 0.839 D 0.004 NO 0.842 D 0.003 NO 0.842 D 0.007 ---25th Street PM 0.603 B 0.650 B 0.874 D 0.874 D 0.000 NO 0.877 D 0.003 NO 0.876 D 0.002 ---

    * While the respective individual impacts of the Mary Star High School project and the Ponte Vista project are less than significant, the study intersection would be significantly impacted by the combined Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School pr[a] The Mary Star by the Sea High School project is not included in this analysis. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Western Avenue. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[c] This column identifies the effectiveness of mitigation measures to be implemented by the project for both the Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School project. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040

    A "YES" indicates that the proposed mitigation measures will mitigate both Mary Star High School traffic and Ponte Vista traffic to less than significant levels. > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020[d] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. > 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010

  • Table B-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE B

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4a] [4b] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE MITIGATION FORYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT FUTURE PRE-PROJECT CHANGE SIGNIF. WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. ALTERNATIVE B CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH PRE-PROJECT [a] W/ MARY STAR [b] V/C IMPACT ALTERNATIVE B V/C IMPACT AND MARY STAR V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4a)-(3)] V/C LOS [(4b)-(4a)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)] [c]

    30 Weymouth Avenue/ AM 0.585 A 0.626 B 0.754 C 0.754 C 0.000 NO 0.757 C 0.003 NO 0.757 C 0.003 ---9th Street PM 0.423 A 0.452 A 0.594 A 0.594 A 0.000 NO 0.598 A 0.004 NO 0.598 A 0.004 ---

    31 Normandie Avenue/ AM 0.894 D 0.956 E 1.061 F 1.061 F 0.000 NO 1.065 F 0.004 NO 1.065 F 0.004 ---Sepulveda Boulevard PM 0.851 D 0.911 E 1.028 F 1.028 F 0.000 NO 1.031 F 0.003 NO 1.031 F 0.003 ---

    32 Normandie Avenue/ AM 0.849 D 0.909 E 0.935 E 0.935 E 0.000 NO 0.937 E 0.002 NO 0.937 E 0.002 ---Lomita Boulevard PM 0.950 E 1.017 F 1.073 F 1.073 F 0.000 NO 1.078 F 0.005 NO 1.078 F 0.005 ---

    33 Normandie Avenue/ AM 0.659 B 0.680 B 0.719 C 0.719 C 0.000 NO 0.724 C 0.005 NO 0.724 C 0.005 ---Pacific Coast Highway [e] PM 0.682 B 0.705 C 0.776 C 0.776 C 0.000 NO 0.784 C 0.008 NO 0.784 C 0.008 ---

    34 Vermont Avenue/ AM 0.631 B 0.676 B 0.702 C 0.702 C 0.000 NO 0.717 C 0.015 NO 0.717 C 0.015 ---Normandie Avenue [g] PM 0.524 A 0.560 A 0.639 B 0.639 B 0.000 NO 0.663 B 0.024 NO 0.663 B 0.024 ---

    35 Vermont Avenue- AM 0.833 D 0.892 D 0.940 E 0.948 E 0.008 NO 0.974 E 0.026 YES 0.874 D -0.066 YESPalos Verdes Drive North- PM 0.884 D 0.945 E 1.068 F 1.069 F 0.001 NO 1.110 F 0.041 YES 1.010 F -0.058 YESGaffey Street/Anaheim Street

    36 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.648 B 0.693 B 0.744 C 0.775 C 0.031 NO 0.784 C 0.009 NO 0.685 B -0.059 ---Westmont Drive PM 0.797 C 0.853 D 0.966 E 0.973 E 0.007 NO 1.009 F 0.036 YES 0.909 E -0.057 YES

    37 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.525 A 0.562 A 0.631 B 0.641 B 0.010 NO 0.654 B 0.013 NO 0.554 A -0.077 ---Capitol Drive PM 0.739 C 0.790 C 0.912 E 0.916 E 0.004 NO 0.924 E 0.008 NO* 0.824 D -0.088 YES

    * While the respective individual impacts of the Mary Star High School project and the Ponte Vista project are less than significant, the study intersection would be significantly impacted by the combined Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School pr[a] The Mary Star by the Sea High School project is not included in this analysis. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Western Avenue. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[c] This column identifies the effectiveness of mitigation measures to be implemented by the project for both the Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School project. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040

    A "YES" indicates that the proposed mitigation measures will mitigate both Mary Star High School traffic and Ponte Vista traffic to less than significant levels. > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020[e] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. In the future, the intersection will operate under the ATSAC/ATCS system. > 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010[g] Stop-controlled intersection on the minor approach.

  • Table B-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE B

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4a] [4b] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE MITIGATION FORYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT FUTURE PRE-PROJECT CHANGE SIGNIF. WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. ALTERNATIVE B CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH PRE-PROJECT [a] W/ MARY STAR [b] V/C IMPACT ALTERNATIVE B V/C IMPACT AND MARY STAR V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4a)-(3)] V/C LOS [(4b)-(4a)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)] [c]

    38 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.765 C 0.823 D 0.885 D 0.900 D 0.015 NO 0.912 E 0.012 YES 0.883 D -0.002 YESMiraflores Avenue- PM 0.751 C 0.809 D 0.962 E 0.964 E 0.002 NO 0.987 E 0.023 YES 0.957 E -0.005 YESI-110 SB Ramps [d]

    39 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.803 D 0.864 D 0.955 E 0.965 E 0.010 YES 0.976 E 0.011 YES 0.946 E -0.009 YESSummerland Avenue [d] PM 0.856 D 0.920 E 1.095 F 1.098 F 0.003 NO 1.115 F 0.017 YES 1.085 F -0.010 YES

    40 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.528 A 0.570 A 0.775 C 0.781 C 0.006 NO 0.785 C 0.004 NO 0.785 C 0.010 ---I-110 NB and SB Ramps [d] PM 0.887 D 0.954 E 1.275 F 1.277 F 0.002 NO 1.280 F 0.003 NO 1.280 F 0.005 ---

    41 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.721 C 0.776 C 0.922 E 0.926 E 0.004 NO 0.927 E 0.001 NO 0.928 E 0.006 ---9th Street [d] PM 0.767 C 0.825 D 1.045 F 1.046 F 0.001 NO 1.049 F 0.003 NO 1.049 F 0.004 ---

    42 Vermont Avenue/ AM 0.914 E 0.978 E 1.068 F 1.068 F 0.000 NO 1.073 F 0.005 NO 1.073 F 0.005 ---Sepulveda Boulevard PM 1.105 F 1.182 F 1.301 F 1.301 F 0.000 NO 1.308 F 0.007 NO 1.308 F 0.007 ---

    43 Vermont Avenue/ AM 1.139 F 1.219 F 1.268 F 1.268 F 0.000 NO 1.268 F 0.000 NO 1.268 F 0.000 ---Lomita Boulevard PM 0.965 E 1.032 F 1.077 F 1.077 F 0.000 NO 1.083 F 0.006 NO 1.083 F 0.006 ---

    44 Vermont Avenue/ AM 0.682 B 0.705 C 0.748 C 0.748 C 0.000 NO 0.766 C 0.018 NO 0.714 C -0.034 ---Pacific Coast Highway [e] PM 0.754 C 0.754 C 0.819 D 0.819 D 0.000 NO 0.846 D 0.027 YES 0.777 C -0.042 YES

    45 Figueroa Street/ AM 0.741 C 0.793 C 0.889 D 0.889 D 0.000 NO 0.890 D 0.001 NO 0.890 D 0.001 ---Sepulveda Boulevard PM 0.735 C 0.787 C 0.867 D 0.867 D 0.000 NO 0.870 D 0.003 NO 0.870 D 0.003 ---

    [a] The Mary Star by the Sea High School project is not included in this analysis. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Western Avenue. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[c] This column identifies the effectiveness of mitigation measures to be implemented by the project for both the Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School project. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040

    A "YES" indicates that the proposed mitigation measures will mitigate both Mary Star High School traffic and Ponte Vista traffic to less than significant levels. > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020[d] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. > 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010[e] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. In the future, the intersection will operate under the ATSAC/ATCS system.

  • Table B-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE B

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4a] [4b] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE MITIGATION FORYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT FUTURE PRE-PROJECT CHANGE SIGNIF. WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. ALTERNATIVE B CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH PRE-PROJECT [a] W/ MARY STAR [b] V/C IMPACT ALTERNATIVE B V/C IMPACT AND MARY STAR V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4a)-(3)] V/C LOS [(4b)-(4a)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)] [c]

    46 Figueroa Street/ AM 0.825 D 0.882 D 0.918 E 0.918 E 0.000 NO 0.935 E 0.017 YES 0.748 C -0.170 YESI-110 NB on-ramp [g] PM 0.841 D 0.900 D 0.937 E 0.937 E 0.000 NO 0.947 E 0.010 YES 0.758 C -0.179 YES(north of PCH)

    47 I-110 SB Ramps/ AM 0.718 C 0.743 C 0.793 C 0.793 C 0.000 NO 0.806 D 0.013 NO 0.806 D 0.013 ---Pacific Coast Highway [e] PM 0.842 D 0.876 D 0.983 E 0.983 E 0.000 NO 0.986 E 0.003 NO 0.986 E 0.003 ---

    48 Figueroa Street/ AM 0.926 E 0.966 E 1.030 F 1.030 F 0.000 NO 1.045 F 0.015 YES 0.990 E -0.040 YESPacific Coast Highway [e] PM 0.913 E 0.952 E 1.021 F 1.021 F 0.000 NO 1.033 F 0.012 YES 0.978 E -0.043 YES

    49 Figueroa Place/ AM 0.502 A 0.537 A 0.576 A 0.579 A 0.003 NO 0.591 A 0.012 NO 0.591 A 0.015 ---I-110 SB off-ramp [g] PM 0.622 B 0.665 B 0.696 B 0.696 B 0.000 NO 0.720 C 0.024 NO 0.719 C 0.023 ---

    50 Figueroa Place/ AM 0.816 D 0.878 D 0.967 E 0.978 E 0.011 YES 1.013 F 0.035 YES 0.945 E -0.022 YESAnaheim Street [d] PM 0.889 D 0.956 E 1.036 F 1.039 F 0.003 NO 1.088 F 0.049 YES 0.934 E -0.102 YES

    51 Figueroa Street/ AM 1.213 F 1.297 F 1.373 F 1.376 F 0.003 NO 1.429 F 0.053 YES 1.203 F -0.170 YESI-110 NB on-ramp [g] PM 0.780 C 0.835 D 0.909 E 0.910 E 0.001 NO 0.940 E 0.030 YES 0.792 C -0.117 YES(north of Anaheim Street)

    52 Figueroa Street/ AM 0.845 D 0.909 E 0.961 E 0.972 E 0.011 YES 1.004 F 0.032 YES 0.936 E -0.025 YESAnaheim Street [d] PM 0.822 D 0.884 D 0.965 E 0.968 E 0.003 NO 0.979 E 0.011 YES 0.949 E -0.016 YES

    [a] The Mary Star by the Sea High School project is not included in this analysis. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Western Avenue. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[c] This column identifies the effectiveness of mitigation measures to be implemented by the project for both the Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School project. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040

    A "YES" indicates that the proposed mitigation measures will mitigate both Mary Star High School traffic and Ponte Vista traffic to less than significant levels. > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020[d] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. > 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010[e] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. In the future, the intersection will operate under the ATSAC/ATCS system.[g] Stop-controlled intersection on the minor approach.

  • Table C-1WEEKDAY ALTERNATIVE "C" TRIP GENERATION [1]

    DAILY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOURTRIP ENDS [2] VOLUMES [2] VOLUMES [2]

    LAND USE SIZE VOLUMES IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL

    ResidentialCondominiums [3] 1,275 DU 5,330 82 352 434 301 184 485

    Senior Housing [4] 425 DU 1,479 15 19 34 29 18 47

    Subtotal Residential Components 6,809 97 371 468 330 202 532

    Non-ResidentialBaseball Fields [5] 2 Fields 143 2 1 3 28 13 41

    Subtotal Non-Residential Components 143 2 1 3 28 13 41

    TOTAL PROJECT 6,952 99 372 471 358 215 573

    [1] Source: ITE "Trip Generation", 7th Edition, 2003.[2] Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving.[3] ITE Land Use Code 232 (High-Rise Residential Condominium/Townhouse) weekday trip generation average ra[4] ITE Land Use Code 252 (Senior Adult Housing - Attached) weekday trip generation average rates.[5] ITE Land Use Code 488 (Soccer Complex) weekday trip generation average rates.

  • Table C-2SATURDAY ALTERNATIVE "C" TRIP GENERATION [1]

    DAILY PEAK HOURTRIP ENDS [2] VOLUMES [2]

    LAND USE SIZE VOLUMES IN OUT TOTAL

    ResidentialCondominiums [3] 1,275 DU 5,495 192 254 446

    Senior Housing [4] 425 DU 1,067 64 64 128

    Subtotal Residential Components 6,562 256 318 574

    Non-ResidentialBaseball Fields [5] 2 Fields 235 27 30 57

    Subtotal Non-Residential Components 235 27 30 57

    TOTAL PROJECT 6,797 283 348 631

    [1] Source: ITE "Trip Generation", 7th Edition, 2003.[2] Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving.[3] ITE Land Use Code 232 (High-Rise Residential Condominium/Townhouse) Saturday

    trip generation average rates.[4] ITE Land Use Code 252 (Senior Adult Housing - Attached) Saturday trip generation

    average rates.[5] ITE Land Use Code 488 (Soccer Complex) Saturday trip generation average rates.

  • Table C-3SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE C

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4a] [4b] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE MITIGATION FORYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT FUTURE PRE-PROJECT CHANGE SIGNIF. WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. ALTERNATIVE C CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH PRE-PROJECT [a] W/ MARY STAR [b] V/C IMPACT ALTERNATIVE C V/C IMPACT AND MARY STAR V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4a)-(3)] V/C LOS [(4b)-(4a)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)] [c]

    1 Hawthorne Boulevard/ AM 1.024 F 1.095 F 1.172 F 1.172 F 0.000 NO 1.173 F 0.001 NO 1.173 F 0.001 ---Sepulveda Boulevard PM 1.104 F 1.181 F 1.275 F 1.275 F 0.000 NO 1.276 F 0.001 NO 1.276 F 0.001 ---

    2 Hawthorne Boulevard/ AM 0.963 E 1.030 F 1.107 F 1.107 F 0.000 NO 1.111 F 0.004 NO 1.111 F 0.004 ---Pacific Coast Highway PM 1.202 F 1.286 F 1.378 F 1.378 F 0.000 NO 1.382 F 0.004 NO 1.382 F 0.004 ---

    3 Hawthorne Boulevard/ AM 0.873 D 0.934 E 0.987 E 0.989 E 0.002 NO 0.993 E 0.004 NO 0.993 E 0.006 ---Palos Verdes Drive North PM 0.817 D 0.874 D 0.941 E 0.942 E 0.001 NO 0.944 E 0.002 NO 0.944 E 0.003 ---

    4 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.907 E 0.970 E 1.097 F 1.097 F 0.000 NO 1.097 F 0.000 NO 1.097 F 0.000 ---Sepulveda Boulevard PM 0.966 E 1.033 F 1.143 F 1.143 F 0.000 NO 1.143 F 0.000 NO 1.143 F 0.000 ---

    5 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.927 E 0.992 E 1.066 F 1.066 F 0.000 NO 1.070 F 0.004 NO 1.070 F 0.004 ---Lomita Boulevard PM 1.117 F 1.195 F 1.296 F 1.296 F 0.000 NO 1.298 F 0.002 NO 1.298 F 0.002 ---

    6 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.988 E 1.057 F 1.135 F 1.135 F 0.000 NO 1.137 F 0.002 NO 1.137 F 0.002 ---Pacific Coast Highway PM 1.070 F 1.145 F 1.264 F 1.264 F 0.000 NO 1.271 F 0.007 NO 1.271 F 0.007 ---

    7 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.776 C 0.830 D 0.877 D 0.877 D 0.000 NO 0.888 D 0.011 NO 0.888 D 0.011 ---Palos Verdes Drive North PM 0.713 C 0.763 C 0.835 D 0.835 D 0.000 NO 0.846 D 0.011 NO 0.847 D 0.012 ---

    8 Arlington Avenue/ AM 0.896 D 0.959 E 0.994 E 0.994 E 0.000 NO 0.998 E 0.004 NO 0.998 E 0.004 ---Lomita Boulevard PM 0.989 E 1.059 F 1.109 F 1.109 F 0.000 NO 1.113 F 0.004 NO 1.113 F 0.004 ---

    [a] The Mary Star by the Sea High School project is not included in this analysis. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Western Avenue. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[c] This column identifies the effectiveness of mitigation measures to be implemented by the project for both the Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School project. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040

    A "YES" indicates that the proposed mitigation measures will mitigate both Mary Star High School traffic and Ponte Vista traffic to less than significant levels. > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020> 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010

    Run LOS

    Print

  • Table C-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE C

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4a] [4b] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE MITIGATION FORYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT FUTURE PRE-PROJECT CHANGE SIGNIF. WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. ALTERNATIVE C CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH PRE-PROJECT [a] W/ MARY STAR [b] V/C IMPACT ALTERNATIVE C V/C IMPACT AND MARY STAR V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4a)-(3)] V/C LOS [(4b)-(4a)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)] [c]

    9 Narbonne Avenue/ AM 0.892 D 0.955 E 1.035 F 1.035 F 0.000 NO 1.040 F 0.005 NO 1.040 F 0.005 ---Pacific Coast Highway PM 0.793 C 0.848 D 0.932 E 0.932 E 0.000 NO 0.935 E 0.003 NO 0.935 E 0.003 ---

    10 Palos Verdes Drive East/ AM 0.777 C 0.831 D 0.913 E 0.919 E 0.006 NO 0.925 E 0.006 NO * 0.841 D -0.072 YESPalos Verdes Drive North PM 0.688 B 0.736 C 0.784 C 0.785 C 0.001 NO 0.796 C 0.011 NO 0.782 C -0.002 ---

    11 Western Avenue/ AM 0.829 D 0.892 D 1.013 F 1.013 F 0.000 NO 1.018 F 0.005 NO 1.018 F 0.005 ---Sepulveda Boulevard [d] PM 0.945 E 1.016 F 1.157 F 1.157 F 0.000 NO 1.163 F 0.006 NO 1.163 F 0.006 ---

    12 Western Avenue/ AM 0.982 E 1.051 F 1.155 F 1.157 F 0.002 NO 1.167 F 0.010 YES 1.067 F -0.088 YESLomita Boulevard PM 1.106 F 1.184 F 1.348 F 1.349 F 0.001 NO 1.371 F 0.022 YES 1.270 F -0.078 YES

    13 Western Avenue/ AM 0.903 E 0.941 E 1.082 F 1.088 F 0.006 NO 1.101 F 0.013 YES 1.036 F -0.046 YESPacific Coast Highway [e] PM 0.969 E 1.012 F 1.215 F 1.216 F 0.001 NO 1.257 F 0.041 YES 1.182 F -0.033 YES

    14 Western Avenue/ AM 0.607 B 0.650 B 0.765 C 0.771 C 0.006 NO 0.802 D 0.031 YES 0.702 C -0.063 YESAnaheim Street PM 0.545 A 0.583 A 0.697 B 0.699 B 0.002 NO 0.717 C 0.018 NO 0.617 B -0.080 ---

    15 Western Avenue/ AM 1.031 F 1.103 F 1.308 F 1.354 F 0.046 YES 1.463 F 0.109 YES 1.233 F -0.075 YESPalos Verdes Drive North PM 1.025 F 1.097 F 1.212 F 1.159 F -0.053 NO 1.297 F 0.138 YES 1.052 F -0.160 YES

    SAT 0.845 D 0.904 E 1.032 F 0.980 E -0.052 NO 1.128 F 0.148 YES 0.908 E -0.124 YES

    16 Western Avenue/ AM 0.582 A 0.623 B 0.701 C 0.721 C 0.020 NO 0.734 C 0.013 NO 0.634 B -0.067 ---Senior Housing Project Access PM 0.527 A 0.564 A 0.659 B 0.664 B 0.005 NO 0.738 C 0.074 YES 0.638 B -0.021 YES

    SAT 0.605 B 0.648 B 0.753 C 0.753 C 0.000 NO 0.832 D 0.079 YES 0.729 C -0.024 YES

    * While the respective individual impacts of the Mary Star High School project and the Ponte Vista project are less than significant, the study intersection would be significantly impacted by the combined Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School pr[a] The Mary Star by the Sea High School project is not included in this analysis. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Western Avenue. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[c] This column identifies the effectiveness of mitigation measures to be implemented by the project for both the Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School project. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040

    A "YES" indicates that the proposed mitigation measures will mitigate both Mary Star High School traffic and Ponte Vista traffic to less than significant levels. > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020[d] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. > 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010[e] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. In the future, the intersection will operate under the ATSAC/ATCS system.

  • Table C-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE C

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4a] [4b] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE MITIGATION FORYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT FUTURE PRE-PROJECT CHANGE SIGNIF. WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. ALTERNATIVE C CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH PRE-PROJECT [a] W/ MARY STAR [b] V/C IMPACT ALTERNATIVE C V/C IMPACT AND MARY STAR V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4a)-(3)] V/C LOS [(4b)-(4a)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)] [c]

    17 Western Avenue/ AM n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.832 D n/a 0.732 C n/a n/aMain Project Access [f] PM n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.673 B n/a 0.573 A n/a n/a

    SAT n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.806 D n/a 0.706 C n/a n/a

    18 Western Avenue/ AM 0.762 C 0.816 D 0.896 D 1.105 F 0.209 YES 1.113 F 0.008 NO 0.880 D -0.016 ---Avenida Aprenda- PM 0.543 A 0.581 A 0.684 B 0.709 C 0.025 NO 0.773 C 0.064 YES 0.643 B -0.041 YESSoutherly Project Access SAT 0.569 A 0.609 B 0.722 C 0.722 C 0.000 NO 0.805 D 0.083 YES 0.656 B -0.066 YES

    19 Western Avenue/ AM 0.884 D 0.946 E 1.030 F 1.104 F 0.074 YES 1.143 F 0.039 YES 0.980 E -0.050 YESWestmont Drive PM 0.873 D 0.934 E 1.019 F 1.037 F 0.018 YES 1.082 F 0.045 YES 0.957 E -0.062 YES

    SAT 0.832 D 0.890 D 1.013 F 1.013 F 0.000 NO 1.067 F 0.054 YES 0.933 E -0.080 YES

    20 Western Avenue/ AM 0.793 C 0.849 D 0.926 E 0.958 E 0.032 YES 0.964 E 0.006 NO * 0.864 D -0.062 YESToscanini Drive PM 0.737 C 0.789 C 0.929 E 0.935 E 0.006 NO 0.944 E 0.009 NO * 0.845 D -0.084 YES

    SAT 0.637 B 0.681 B 0.861 D 0.861 D 0.000 NO 0.878 D 0.017 NO 0.778 C -0.083 ---

    21 Western Avenue/ AM 0.598 A 0.640 B 0.709 C 0.738 C 0.029 NO 0.746 C 0.008 NO 0.646 B -0.063 ---Caddington Drive PM 0.721 C 0.772 C 0.858 D 0.862 D 0.004 NO 0.888 D 0.026 YES 0.789 C -0.069 YES

    SAT 0.751 C 0.804 D 0.929 E 0.929 E 0.000 NO 0.951 E 0.022 YES 0.851 D -0.078 YES

    22 Western Avenue/ AM 0.940 E 1.005 F 1.093 F 1.125 F 0.032 YES 1.133 F 0.008 NO 1.033 F -0.060 ---Capitol Drive PM 0.898 D 0.961 E 1.137 F 1.143 F 0.006 NO 1.163 F 0.020 YES 1.064 F -0.073 YES

    SAT 0.969 E 1.037 F 1.296 F 1.296 F 0.000 NO 1.314 F 0.018 YES 1.214 F -0.082 YES

    * While the respective individual impacts of the Mary Star High School project and the Ponte Vista project are less than significant, the study intersection would be significantly impacted by the combined Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School pr[a] The Mary Star by the Sea High School project is not included in this analysis. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Western Avenue. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[c] This column identifies the effectiveness of mitigation measures to be implemented by the project for both the Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School project. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040

    A "YES" indicates that the proposed mitigation measures will mitigate both Mary Star High School traffic and Ponte Vista traffic to less than significant levels. > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020[f] This intersection will be created as part of the proposed project. A new traffic signal will be proposed at the Western Avenue/Main Project Access intersection. > 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010

  • Table C-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE C

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4a] [4b] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE MITIGATION FORYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT FUTURE PRE-PROJECT CHANGE SIGNIF. WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. ALTERNATIVE C CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH PRE-PROJECT [a] W/ MARY STAR [b] V/C IMPACT ALTERNATIVE C V/C IMPACT AND MARY STAR V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4a)-(3)] V/C LOS [(4b)-(4a)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)] [c]

    23 Western Avenue/ AM 0.792 C 0.848 D 0.923 E 0.938 E 0.015 YES 0.945 E 0.007 NO 0.845 D -0.078 ---Park Western Drive PM 0.629 B 0.673 B 0.792 C 0.794 C 0.002 NO 0.810 D 0.016 NO 0.711 C -0.081 ---

    SAT 0.813 D 0.870 D 1.044 F 1.044 F 0.000 NO 1.058 F 0.014 YES 0.958 E -0.086 YES

    24 Western Avenue/ AM 0.809 D 0.866 D 0.935 E 0.951 E 0.016 YES 0.955 E 0.004 NO 0.855 D -0.080 ---Crestwood Street PM 0.520 A 0.556 A 0.660 B 0.663 B 0.003 NO 0.668 B 0.005 NO 0.569 A -0.091 ---

    SAT 0.878 D 0.939 E 1.062 F 1.062 F 0.000 NO 1.072 F 0.010 YES 0.972 E -0.090 YES

    25 Western Avenue/ AM 0.877 D 0.938 E 1.018 F 1.051 F 0.033 YES 1.057 F 0.006 NO 0.957 E -0.061 ---Summerland Avenue PM 0.804 D 0.860 D 0.975 E 0.977 E 0.002 NO 0.996 E 0.019 YES 0.896 D -0.079 YES

    SAT 0.760 C 0.813 D 0.958 E 0.958 E 0.000 NO 0.976 E 0.018 YES 0.876 D -0.082 YES

    26 Western Avenue/ AM 0.951 E 1.023 F 1.122 F 1.127 F 0.005 NO 1.132 F 0.005 NO * 1.102 F -0.020 YES1st Street [d] PM 0.876 D 0.942 E 1.017 F 1.018 F 0.001 NO 1.022 F 0.004 NO 0.992 E -0.025 ---

    SAT 0.721 C 0.776 C 0.931 E 0.931 E 0.000 NO 0.937 E 0.006 NO 0.907 E -0.024 ---

    27 Western Avenue/ AM 0.582 A 0.635 B 0.684 B 0.689 B 0.005 NO 0.693 B 0.004 NO 0.694 B 0.010 ---Weymouth Avenue [d] PM 0.563 A 0.607 B 0.689 B 0.690 B 0.001 NO 0.697 B 0.007 NO 0.698 B 0.009 ---

    28 Western Avenue/ AM 0.465 A 0.503 A 0.527 A 0.532 A 0.005 NO 0.533 A 0.001 NO 0.533 A 0.006 ---9th Street [d] PM 0.581 A 0.626 B 0.690 B 0.691 B 0.001 NO 0.693 B 0.002 NO 0.693 B 0.003 ---

    29 Western Avenue/ AM 0.642 B 0.691 B 0.835 D 0.839 D 0.004 NO 0.842 D 0.003 NO 0.842 D 0.007 ---25th Street PM 0.603 B 0.650 B 0.874 D 0.874 D 0.000 NO 0.877 D 0.003 NO 0.876 D 0.002 ---

    * While the respective individual impacts of the Mary Star High School project and the Ponte Vista project are less than significant, the study intersection would be significantly impacted by the combined Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School pr[a] The Mary Star by the Sea High School project is not included in this analysis. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Western Avenue. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[c] This column identifies the effectiveness of mitigation measures to be implemented by the project for both the Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School project. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040

    A "YES" indicates that the proposed mitigation measures will mitigate both Mary Star High School traffic and Ponte Vista traffic to less than significant levels. > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020[d] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. > 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010

  • Table C-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE C

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4a] [4b] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE MITIGATION FORYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT FUTURE PRE-PROJECT CHANGE SIGNIF. WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. ALTERNATIVE C CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH PRE-PROJECT [a] W/ MARY STAR [b] V/C IMPACT ALTERNATIVE C V/C IMPACT AND MARY STAR V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4a)-(3)] V/C LOS [(4b)-(4a)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)] [c]

    30 Weymouth Avenue/ AM 0.585 A 0.626 B 0.754 C 0.754 C 0.000 NO 0.757 C 0.003 NO 0.757 C 0.003 ---9th Street PM 0.423 A 0.452 A 0.594 A 0.594 A 0.000 NO 0.598 A 0.004 NO 0.598 A 0.004 ---

    31 Normandie Avenue/ AM 0.894 D 0.956 E 1.061 F 1.061 F 0.000 NO 1.065 F 0.004 NO 1.065 F 0.004 ---Sepulveda Boulevard PM 0.851 D 0.911 E 1.028 F 1.028 F 0.000 NO 1.031 F 0.003 NO 1.031 F 0.003 ---

    32 Normandie Avenue/ AM 0.849 D 0.909 E 0.935 E 0.935 E 0.000 NO 0.937 E 0.002 NO 0.937 E 0.002 ---Lomita Boulevard PM 0.950 E 1.017 F 1.073 F 1.073 F 0.000 NO 1.078 F 0.005 NO 1.078 F 0.005 ---

    33 Normandie Avenue/ AM 0.659 B 0.680 B 0.719 C 0.719 C 0.000 NO 0.724 C 0.005 NO 0.724 C 0.005 ---Pacific Coast Highway [e] PM 0.682 B 0.705 C 0.776 C 0.776 C 0.000 NO 0.784 C 0.008 NO 0.784 C 0.008 ---

    34 Vermont Avenue/ AM 0.631 B 0.676 B 0.702 C 0.702 C 0.000 NO 0.716 C 0.014 NO 0.716 C 0.014 ---Normandie Avenue [g] PM 0.524 A 0.560 A 0.639 B 0.639 B 0.000 NO 0.662 B 0.023 NO 0.662 B 0.023 ---

    35 Vermont Avenue- AM 0.833 D 0.892 D 0.940 E 0.948 E 0.008 NO 0.973 E 0.025 YES 0.873 D -0.067 YESPalos Verdes Drive North- PM 0.884 D 0.945 E 1.068 F 1.069 F 0.001 NO 1.108 F 0.039 YES 1.008 F -0.060 YESGaffey Street/Anaheim Street

    36 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.648 B 0.693 B 0.744 C 0.775 C 0.031 NO 0.783 C 0.008 NO 0.683 B -0.061 ---Westmont Drive PM 0.797 C 0.853 D 0.966 E 0.973 E 0.007 NO 1.007 F 0.034 YES 0.907 E -0.059 YES

    37 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.525 A 0.562 A 0.631 B 0.641 B 0.010 NO 0.654 B 0.013 NO 0.554 A -0.077 ---Capitol Drive PM 0.739 C 0.790 C 0.912 E 0.916 E 0.004 NO 0.923 E 0.007 NO* 0.823 D -0.089 YES

    * While the respective individual impacts of the Mary Star High School project and the Ponte Vista project are less than significant, the study intersection would be significantly impacted by the combined Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School pr[a] The Mary Star by the Sea High School project is not included in this analysis. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Western Avenue. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[c] This column identifies the effectiveness of mitigation measures to be implemented by the project for both the Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School project. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040

    A "YES" indicates that the proposed mitigation measures will mitigate both Mary Star High School traffic and Ponte Vista traffic to less than significant levels. > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020[e] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. In the future, the intersection will operate under the ATSAC/ATCS system. > 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010[g] Stop-controlled intersection on the minor approach.

  • Table C-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE C

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4a] [4b] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE MITIGATION FORYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT FUTURE PRE-PROJECT CHANGE SIGNIF. WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. ALTERNATIVE C CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH PRE-PROJECT [a] W/ MARY STAR [b] V/C IMPACT ALTERNATIVE C V/C IMPACT AND MARY STAR V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4a)-(3)] V/C LOS [(4b)-(4a)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)] [c]

    38 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.765 C 0.823 D 0.885 D 0.900 D 0.015 NO 0.912 E 0.012 YES 0.882 D -0.003 YESMiraflores Avenue- PM 0.751 C 0.809 D 0.962 E 0.964 E 0.002 NO 0.987 E 0.023 YES 0.957 E -0.005 YESI-110 SB Ramps [d]

    39 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.803 D 0.864 D 0.955 E 0.965 E 0.010 YES 0.975 E 0.010 YES 0.945 E -0.010 YESSummerland Avenue [d] PM 0.856 D 0.920 E 1.095 F 1.098 F 0.003 NO 1.114 F 0.016 YES 1.084 F -0.011 YES

    40 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.528 A 0.570 A 0.775 C 0.781 C 0.006 NO 0.785 C 0.004 NO 0.785 C 0.010 ---I-110 NB and SB Ramps [d] PM 0.887 D 0.954 E 1.275 F 1.277 F 0.002 NO 1.280 F 0.003 NO 1.280 F 0.005 ---

    41 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.721 C 0.776 C 0.922 E 0.926 E 0.004 NO 0.927 E 0.001 NO 0.928 E 0.006 ---9th Street [d] PM 0.767 C 0.825 D 1.045 F 1.046 F 0.001 NO 1.049 F 0.003 NO 1.049 F 0.004 ---

    42 Vermont Avenue/ AM 0.914 E 0.978 E 1.068 F 1.068 F 0.000 NO 1.073 F 0.005 NO 1.073 F 0.005 ---Sepulveda Boulevard PM 1.105 F 1.182 F 1.301 F 1.301 F 0.000 NO 1.308 F 0.007 NO 1.308 F 0.007 ---

    43 Vermont Avenue/ AM 1.139 F 1.219 F 1.268 F 1.268 F 0.000 NO 1.268 F 0.000 NO 1.268 F 0.000 ---Lomita Boulevard PM 0.965 E 1.032 F 1.077 F 1.077 F 0.000 NO 1.082 F 0.005 NO 1.082 F 0.005 ---

    44 Vermont Avenue/ AM 0.682 B 0.705 C 0.748 C 0.748 C 0.000 NO 0.765 C 0.017 NO 0.714 C -0.034 ---Pacific Coast Highway [e] PM 0.754 C 0.754 C 0.819 D 0.819 D 0.000 NO 0.844 D 0.025 YES 0.776 C -0.043 YES

    45 Figueroa Street/ AM 0.741 C 0.793 C 0.889 D 0.889 D 0.000 NO 0.890 D 0.001 NO 0.890 D 0.001 ---Sepulveda Boulevard PM 0.735 C 0.787 C 0.867 D 0.867 D 0.000 NO 0.870 D 0.003 NO 0.870 D 0.003 ---

    [a] The Mary Star by the Sea High School project is not included in this analysis. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Western Avenue. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[c] This column identifies the effectiveness of mitigation measures to be implemented by the project for both the Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School project. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040

    A "YES" indicates that the proposed mitigation measures will mitigate both Mary Star High School traffic and Ponte Vista traffic to less than significant levels. > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020[d] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. > 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010[e] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. In the future, the intersection will operate under the ATSAC/ATCS system.

  • Table C-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE C

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4a] [4b] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE MITIGATION FORYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT FUTURE PRE-PROJECT CHANGE SIGNIF. WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. ALTERNATIVE C CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH PRE-PROJECT [a] W/ MARY STAR [b] V/C IMPACT ALTERNATIVE C V/C IMPACT AND MARY STAR V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4a)-(3)] V/C LOS [(4b)-(4a)] V/C LOS [(5)-(3)] [c]

    46 Figueroa Street/ AM 0.825 D 0.882 D 0.918 E 0.918 E 0.000 NO 0.935 E 0.017 YES 0.748 C -0.170 YESI-110 NB on-ramp [g] PM 0.841 D 0.900 D 0.937 E 0.937 E 0.000 NO 0.946 E 0.009 NO 0.757 C -0.180 ---(north of PCH)

    47 I-110 SB Ramps/ AM 0.718 C 0.743 C 0.793 C 0.793 C 0.000 NO 0.806 D 0.013 NO 0.806 D 0.013 ---Pacific Coast Highway [e] PM 0.842 D 0.876 D 0.983 E 0.983 E 0.000 NO 0.986 E 0.003 NO 0.986 E 0.003 ---

    48 Figueroa Street/ AM 0.926 E 0.966 E 1.030 F 1.030 F 0.000 NO 1.045 F 0.015 YES 0.990 E -0.040 YESPacific Coast Highway [e] PM 0.913 E 0.952 E 1.021 F 1.021 F 0.000 NO 1.032 F 0.011 YES 0.977 E -0.044 YES

    49 Figueroa Place/ AM 0.502 A 0.537 A 0.576 A 0.579 A 0.003 NO 0.590 A 0.011 NO 0.590 A 0.014 ---I-110 SB off-ramp [g] PM 0.622 B 0.665 B 0.696 B 0.696 B 0.000 NO 0.719 C 0.023 NO 0.719 C 0.023 ---

    50 Figueroa Place/ AM 0.816 D 0.878 D 0.967 E 0.978 E 0.011 YES 1.011 F 0.033 YES 0.945 E -0.022 YESAnaheim Street [d] PM 0.889 D 0.956 E 1.036 F 1.039 F 0.003 NO 1.085 F 0.046 YES 0.933 E -0.103 YES

    51 Figueroa Street/ AM 1.213 F 1.297 F 1.373 F 1.376 F 0.003 NO 1.429 F 0.053 YES 1.203 F -0.170 YESI-110 NB on-ramp [g] PM 0.780 C 0.835 D 0.909 E 0.910 E 0.001 NO 0.938 E 0.028 YES 0.790 C -0.119 YES(north of Anaheim Street)

    52 Figueroa Street/ AM 0.845 D 0.909 E 0.961 E 0.972 E 0.011 YES 1.004 F 0.032 YES 0.936 E -0.025 YESAnaheim Street [d] PM 0.822 D 0.884 D 0.965 E 0.968 E 0.003 NO 0.979 E 0.011 YES 0.949 E -0.016 YES

    [a] The Mary Star by the Sea High School project is not included in this analysis. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:[b] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Western Avenue. Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c[c] This column identifies the effectiveness of mitigation measures to be implemented by the project for both the Ponte Vista project and the Mary Star High School project. > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040

    A "YES" indicates that the proposed mitigation measures will mitigate both Mary Star High School traffic and Ponte Vista traffic to less than significant levels. > 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020[d] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. > 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010[e] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. In the future, the intersection will operate under the ATSAC/ATCS system.[g] Stop-controlled intersection on the minor approach.

  • Table D-1WEEKDAY ALTERNATIVE "D" TRIP GENERATION [1]

    DAILY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOURTRIP ENDS [2] VOLUMES [2] VOLUMES [2]

    LAND USE SIZE VOLUMES IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL

    ResidentialCondominiums [3] 432 DU 1,806 28 119 147 102 62 164

    Condominiums [4] 128 DU 750 10 46 56 45 22 67

    Subtotal Residential Components 2,556 38 165 203 147 84 231

    Non-ResidentialShopping Center [5]500,000 GLSF 19,332 251 160 411 869 942 1,811Less 20% Pass-by [6] (3,866) (50) (32) (82) (174) (188) (362)

    Subtotal Non-Residential Components 15,466 201 128 329 695 754 1,449

    TOTAL PROJECT 18,022 239 293 532 842 838 1,680

    [1] Source: ITE "Trip Generation", 7th Edition, 2003.[2] Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving.[3] ITE Land Use Code 232 (High-Rise Residential Condominium/Townhouse) weekday trip generation average rate[4] ITE Land Use Code 230 (Condominium/Townhouse) weekday trip generation average rates.[5] ITE Land Use Code 820 (Shopping Center) weekday trip generation equation rates.[6] Pass-by trips reductions are based on LADOT Traffic Study Policies and Procedures, March 2002.

  • Table D-2SATURDAY ALTERNATIVE "D" TRIP GENERATION [1]

    DAILY PEAK HOURTRIP ENDS [2] VOLUMES [2]

    LAND USE SIZE VOLUMES IN OUT TOTAL

    ResidentialCondominiums [3] 432 DU 1,862 65 86 151

    Condominiums [4] 128 DU 726 32 28 60

    Subtotal Residential Components 2,588 97 114 211

    Non-ResidentialShopping Center [5] 500,000 GLSF 25,469 #### 961 2,464Less 20% Pass-by [6] (5,094) (301) (192) (493)

    Subtotal Non-Residential Components 20,375 #### 769 1,971

    TOTAL PROJECT 22,963 #### 883 2,182

    [1] Source: ITE "Trip Generation", 7th Edition, 2003.[2] Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving.[3] ITE Land Use Code 232 (High-Rise Residential Condominium/Townhouse) Saturday

    trip generation average rates.[4] ITE Land Use Code 230 (Condominium/Townhouse) Saturday trip generation average rates.[5] ITE Land Use Code 820 (Shopping Center) Saturday trip generation equation rates.[6] Pass-by trips reductions are based on LADOT Traffic Study Policies and Procedures, March

  • Table D-3SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE D

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTUREYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT PRE-PROJECT WITH CHANGE SIGNIF.

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH W/ MARY STAR [a] ALTERNATIVE D V/C IMPACTNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4)-(3)]

    1 Hawthorne Boulevard/ AM 1.024 F 1.095 F 1.172 F 1.173 F 0.001 NOSepulveda Boulevard PM 1.104 F 1.181 F 1.275 F 1.277 F 0.002 NO

    2 Hawthorne Boulevard/ AM 0.963 E 1.030 F 1.107 F 1.110 F 0.003 NOPacific Coast Highway PM 1.202 F 1.286 F 1.378 F 1.385 F 0.007 NO

    3 Hawthorne Boulevard/ AM 0.873 D 0.934 E 0.989 E 0.993 E 0.004 NOPalos Verdes Drive North PM 0.817 D 0.874 D 0.942 E 0.951 E 0.009 NO

    4 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.907 E 0.970 E 1.097 F 1.097 F 0.000 NOSepulveda Boulevard PM 0.966 E 1.033 F 1.143 F 1.143 F 0.000 NO

    5 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.927 E 0.992 E 1.066 F 1.069 F 0.003 NOLomita Boulevard PM 1.117 F 1.195 F 1.296 F 1.303 F 0.007 NO

    6 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.988 E 1.057 F 1.135 F 1.137 F 0.002 NOPacific Coast Highway PM 1.070 F 1.145 F 1.264 F 1.274 F 0.010 YES

    7 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.776 C 0.830 D 0.877 D 0.887 D 0.010 NOPalos Verdes Drive North PM 0.713 C 0.763 C 0.835 D 0.856 D 0.021 YES

    8 Arlington Avenue/ AM 0.896 D 0.959 E 0.994 E 0.997 E 0.003 NOLomita Boulevard PM 0.989 E 1.059 F 1.109 F 1.115 F 0.006 NO

    [a] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Taper Avenue.

    Run LOS

    Print

  • Table D-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE D

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTUREYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT PRE-PROJECT WITH CHANGE SIGNIF.

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH W/ MARY STAR [a] ALTERNATIVE D V/C IMPACTNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4)-(3)]

    9 Narbonne Avenue/ AM 0.892 D 0.955 E 1.035 F 1.038 F 0.003 NOPacific Coast Highway PM 0.793 C 0.848 D 0.932 E 0.939 E 0.007 NO

    10 Palos Verdes Drive East/ AM 0.777 C 0.831 D 0.919 E 0.926 E 0.007 NOPalos Verdes Drive North PM 0.688 B 0.736 C 0.785 C 0.809 D 0.024 YES

    11 Western Avenue/ AM 0.829 D 0.892 D 1.013 F 1.016 F 0.003 NOSepulveda Boulevard [b] PM 0.945 E 1.016 F 1.157 F 1.174 F 0.017 YES

    12 Western Avenue/ AM 0.982 E 1.051 F 1.157 F 1.167 F 0.010 YESLomita Boulevard PM 1.106 F 1.184 F 1.349 F 1.396 F 0.047 YES

    13 Western Avenue/ AM 0.903 E 0.941 E 1.088 F 1.103 F 0.015 YESPacific Coast Highway [c] PM 0.969 E 1.012 F 1.216 F 1.310 F 0.094 YES

    14 Western Avenue/ AM 0.607 B 0.650 B 0.770 C 0.793 C 0.023 NOAnaheim Street PM 0.545 A 0.583 A 0.699 B 0.761 C 0.062 YES

    15 Western Avenue/ AM 1.031 F 1.103 F 1.322 F 1.438 F 0.116 YESPalos Verdes Drive North PM 1.025 F 1.097 F 1.155 F 1.447 F 0.292 YES

    SAT 0.845 D 0.904 E 0.980 E 1.483 F 0.503 YES

    16 Western Avenue/ AM 0.582 A 0.623 B 0.713 C 0.788 C 0.075 YESSenior Housing Project Access PM 0.527 A 0.564 A 0.662 B 0.861 D 0.199 YES

    SAT 0.605 B 0.648 B 0.753 C 1.326 F 0.573 YES

    [a] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Taper Avenue.[b] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system.[c] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. In the future, the intersection will operate under the ATSAC/ATCS system.

  • Table D-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE D

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTUREYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT PRE-PROJECT WITH CHANGE SIGNIF.

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH W/ MARY STAR [a] ALTERNATIVE D V/C IMPACTNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4)-(3)]

    17 Western Avenue/ AM n/a n/a n/a 0.824 D n/aMain Project Access [d] PM n/a n/a n/a 0.781 C n/a

    SAT n/a n/a n/a 1.038 F n/a

    18 Western Avenue/ AM 0.762 C 0.816 D 0.908 E 1.026 F 0.118 YESAvenida Aprenda- PM 0.543 A 0.581 A 0.687 B 0.853 D 0.166 YESSoutherly Project Access SAT 0.569 A 0.609 B 0.722 C 0.940 E 0.218 YES

    19 Western Avenue/ AM 0.884 D 0.946 E 1.109 F 1.159 F 0.050 YESWestmont Drive PM 0.873 D 0.934 E 1.033 F 1.200 F 0.167 YES

    SAT 0.832 D 0.890 D 1.013 F 1.233 F 0.220 YES

    20 Western Avenue/ AM 0.793 C 0.849 D 0.938 E 0.958 E 0.020 YESToscanini Drive PM 0.737 C 0.789 C 0.931 E 0.990 E 0.059 YES

    SAT 0.637 B 0.681 B 0.861 D 0.937 E 0.076 YES

    21 Western Avenue/ AM 0.598 A 0.640 B 0.718 C 0.737 C 0.019 NOCaddington Drive PM 0.721 C 0.772 C 0.859 D 0.928 E 0.069 YES

    SAT 0.751 C 0.804 D 0.929 E 0.994 E 0.065 YES

    22 Western Avenue/ AM 0.940 E 1.005 F 1.102 F 1.122 F 0.020 YESCapitol Drive PM 0.898 D 0.961 E 1.138 F 1.207 F 0.069 YES

    SAT 0.969 E 1.037 F 1.296 F 1.400 F 0.104 YES

    [a] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Taper Avenue.[d] This intersection will be created as part of the proposed project. A new traffic signal will be proposed at the Western Avenue/Main Project

    Access intersection.

  • Table D-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE D

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTUREYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT PRE-PROJECT WITH CHANGE SIGNIF.

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH W/ MARY STAR [a] ALTERNATIVE D V/C IMPACTNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4)-(3)]

    23 Western Avenue/ AM 0.792 C 0.848 D 0.929 E 0.944 E 0.015 YESPark Western Drive PM 0.629 B 0.673 B 0.793 C 0.847 D 0.054 YES

    SAT 0.813 D 0.870 D 1.044 F 1.126 F 0.082 YES

    24 Western Avenue/ AM 0.809 D 0.866 D 0.941 E 0.955 E 0.014 YESCrestwood Street PM 0.520 A 0.556 A 0.661 B 0.700 B 0.039 NO

    SAT 0.878 D 0.939 E 1.062 F 1.141 F 0.079 YES

    25 Western Avenue/ AM 0.877 D 0.938 E 1.023 F 1.041 F 0.018 YESSummerland Avenue PM 0.804 D 0.860 D 0.976 E 1.041 F 0.065 YES

    SAT 0.760 C 0.813 D 0.958 E 1.059 F 0.101 YES

    26 Western Avenue/ AM 0.951 E 1.023 F 1.127 F 1.137 F 0.010 YES1st Street [b] PM 0.876 D 0.942 E 1.018 F 1.047 F 0.029 YES

    SAT 0.721 C 0.776 C 0.931 E 0.979 E 0.048 YES

    27 Western Avenue/ AM 0.582 A 0.635 B 0.689 B 0.698 B 0.009 NOWeymouth Avenue [b] PM 0.563 A 0.607 B 0.690 B 0.721 C 0.031 NO

    28 Western Avenue/ AM 0.465 A 0.503 A 0.532 A 0.536 A 0.004 NO9th Street [b] PM 0.581 A 0.626 B 0.691 B 0.708 C 0.017 NO

    29 Western Avenue/ AM 0.642 B 0.691 B 0.839 D 0.844 D 0.005 NO25th Street PM 0.603 B 0.650 B 0.874 D 0.889 D 0.015 NO

    [a] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Taper Avenue.[b] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system.

  • Table D-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE D

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTUREYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT PRE-PROJECT WITH CHANGE SIGNIF.

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH W/ MARY STAR [a] ALTERNATIVE D V/C IMPACTNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4)-(3)]

    30 Weymouth Avenue/ AM 0.585 A 0.626 B 0.754 C 0.757 C 0.003 NO9th Street PM 0.423 A 0.452 A 0.594 A 0.606 B 0.012 NO

    31 Normandie Avenue/ AM 0.894 D 0.956 E 1.061 F 1.064 F 0.003 NOSepulveda Boulevard PM 0.851 D 0.911 E 1.028 F 1.034 F 0.006 NO

    32 Normandie Avenue/ AM 0.849 D 0.909 E 0.935 E 0.938 E 0.003 NOLomita Boulevard PM 0.950 E 1.017 F 1.073 F 1.082 F 0.009 NO

    33 Normandie Avenue/ AM 0.659 B 0.680 B 0.722 C 0.727 C 0.005 NOPacific Coast Highway [c] PM 0.682 B 0.705 C 0.777 C 0.796 C 0.019 NO

    34 Vermont Avenue/ AM 0.631 B 0.676 B 0.708 C 0.726 C 0.018 NONormandie Avenue [e] PM 0.524 A 0.560 A 0.640 B 0.698 B 0.058 NO

    35 Vermont Avenue- AM 0.833 D 0.892 D 0.950 E 0.976 E 0.026 YESPalos Verdes Drive North- PM 0.884 D 0.945 E 1.069 F 1.175 F 0.106 YESGaffey Street/Anaheim Street

    36 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.648 B 0.693 B 0.849 D 0.866 D 0.017 NOWestmont Drive PM 0.797 C 0.853 D 0.983 E 1.076 F 0.093 YES

    37 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.525 A 0.562 A 0.654 B 0.665 B 0.011 NOCapitol Drive PM 0.739 C 0.790 C 0.923 E 0.952 E 0.029 YES

    [a] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Taper Avenue.[c] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. In the future, the intersection will operate under the ATSAC/ATCS system.[e] Stop-controlled intersection on the minor approach.

  • Table D-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE D

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTUREYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT PRE-PROJECT WITH CHANGE SIGNIF.

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH W/ MARY STAR [a] ALTERNATIVE D V/C IMPACTNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4)-(3)]

    38 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.765 C 0.823 D 0.910 E 0.927 E 0.017 YESMiraflores Avenue- PM 0.751 C 0.809 D 0.966 E 1.025 F 0.059 YESI-110 SB Ramps [b]

    39 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.803 D 0.864 D 0.992 E 1.006 F 0.014 YESSummerland Avenue [b] PM 0.856 D 0.920 E 1.103 F 1.147 F 0.044 YES

    40 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.528 A 0.570 A 0.781 C 0.784 C 0.003 NOI-110 NB and SB Ramps [b] PM 0.887 D 0.954 E 1.277 F 1.287 F 0.010 YES

    41 Gaffey Street/ AM 0.721 C 0.776 C 0.926 E 0.929 E 0.003 NO9th Street [b] PM 0.767 C 0.825 D 1.046 F 1.056 F 0.010 YES

    42 Vermont Avenue/ AM 0.914 E 0.978 E 1.068 F 1.071 F 0.003 NOSepulveda Boulevard PM 1.105 F 1.182 F 1.301 F 1.312 F 0.011 YES

    43 Vermont Avenue/ AM 1.139 F 1.219 F 1.268 F 1.269 F 0.001 NOLomita Boulevard PM 0.965 E 1.032 F 1.077 F 1.087 F 0.010 YES

    44 Vermont Avenue/ AM 0.682 B 0.705 C 0.748 C 0.773 C 0.025 NOPacific Coast Highway [c] PM 0.754 C 0.754 C 0.819 D 0.901 E 0.082 YES

    45 Figueroa Street/ AM 0.741 C 0.793 C 0.889 D 0.890 D 0.001 NOSepulveda Boulevard PM 0.735 C 0.787 C 0.867 D 0.871 D 0.004 NO

    [a] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Taper Avenue.[b] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system.[c] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. In the future, the intersection will operate under the ATSAC/ATCS system.

  • Table D-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE D

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [3] [4]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTUREYEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT PRE-PROJECT WITH CHANGE SIGNIF.

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH W/ MARY STAR [a] ALTERNATIVE D V/C IMPACTNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4)-(3)]

    46 Figueroa Street/ AM 0.825 D 0.882 D 0.918 E 0.935 E 0.017 YESI-110 NB on-ramp [e] PM 0.841 D 0.900 D 0.937 E 0.996 E 0.059 YES(north of PCH)

    47 I-110 SB Ramps/ AM 0.718 C 0.743 C 0.793 C 0.806 D 0.013 NOPacific Coast Highway [c] PM 0.842 D 0.876 D 0.983 E 0.995 E 0.012 YES

    48 Figueroa Street/ AM 0.926 E 0.966 E 1.030 F 1.046 F 0.016 YESPacific Coast Highway [c] PM 0.913 E 0.952 E 1.021 F 1.077 F 0.056 YES

    49 Figueroa Place/ AM 0.502 A 0.537 A 0.579 A 0.595 A 0.016 NOI-110 SB off-ramp [e] PM 0.622 B 0.665 B 0.696 B 0.746 C 0.050 YES

    50 Figueroa Place/ AM 0.816 D 0.878 D 0.978 E 1.020 F 0.042 YESAnaheim Street [b] PM 0.889 D 0.956 E 1.039 F 1.177 F 0.138 YES

    51 Figueroa Street/ AM 1.213 F 1.297 F 1.376 F 1.418 F 0.042 YESI-110 NB on-ramp [e] PM 0.780 C 0.835 D 0.910 E 1.028 F 0.118 YES(north of Anaheim Street)

    52 Figueroa Street/ AM 0.845 D 0.909 E 0.972 E 0.998 E 0.026 YESAnaheim Street [b] PM 0.822 D 0.884 D 0.968 E 0.996 E 0.028 YES

    [a] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Taper Avenue.[b] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system.[c] The intersection currently operates under the ATSAC system. In the future, the intersection will operate under the ATSAC/ATCS system.[e] Stop-controlled intersection on the minor approach.

  • Table E-1WEEKDAY ALTERNATIVE "E" TRIP GENERATION [1]

    DAILY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOURTRIP ENDS [2] VOLUMES [2] VOLUMES [2]

    LAND USE SIZE VOLUMES IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL

    ResidentialCondominiums [3] 734 DU 3,068 48 202 250 173 106 279

    Condominiums [4] 196 DU 1,149 15 71 86 68 34 102

    Subtotal Residential Components 4,217 63 273 336 241 140 381

    Non-ResidentialBio-Medical Research Facility400,000 GSF 3,244 412 84 496 65 367 432

    Subtotal Non-Residential Components 3,244 412 84 496 65 367 432

    TOTAL PROJECT 7,461 475 357 832 306 507 813

    [1] Source: ITE "Trip Generation", 7th Edition, 2003.[2] Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving.[3] ITE Land Use Code 232 (High-Rise Residential Condominium/Townhouse) weekday trip generation average rates.[4] ITE Land Use Code 230 (Condominium/Townhouse) weekday trip generation average rates.[5] ITE Land Use Code 760 (Research and Development Center) weekday trip generation equation rates.

  • Table E-2SATURDAY ALTERNATIVE "E" TRIP GENERATION [1]

    DAILY PEAK HOURTRIP ENDS [2] VOLUMES [2]

    LAND USE SIZE VOLUMES IN OUT TOTAL

    ResidentialCondominiums [3] 734 DU 3,164 111 146 257

    Condominiums [4] 196 DU 1,111 50 42 92

    Subtotal Residential Components 4,275 161 188 349

    Non-ResidentialBio-Medical Research Facility [ 400,000 GSF 760 14 82 96

    Subtotal Non-Residential Components 760 14 82 96

    TOTAL PROJECT 5,035 175 270 445

    [1] Source: ITE "Trip Generation", 7th Edition, 2003.[2] Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving.[3] ITE Land Use Code 232 (High-Rise Residential Condominium/Townhouse) Saturday

    trip generation average rates.[4] ITE Land Use Code 230 (Condominium/Townhouse) Saturday trip generation average rates.[5] ITE Land Use Code 760 (Research and Development Center) Saturday trip generation equation

  • Table E-3SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE E

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [4a] [4b] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE YEAR 2012YEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT PRE-PROJECT WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. W/ PROJECT CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH W/ MARY STAR [a] ALTERNATIVE E V/C IMPACT MITIGATION V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4b)-(4a)] V/C LOS [(5)-(4a)]

    1 Hawthorne Boulevard/ AM 1.024 F 1.095 F 1.172 F 1.173 F 0.001 NO 1.173 F 0.001 ---Sepulveda Boulevard PM 1.104 F 1.181 F 1.275 F 1.277 F 0.002 NO 1.277 F 0.002 ---

    2 Hawthorne Boulevard/ AM 0.963 E 1.030 F 1.107 F 1.111 F 0.004 NO 1.111 F 0.004 ---Pacific Coast Highway PM 1.202 F 1.286 F 1.378 F 1.382 F 0.004 NO 1.382 F 0.004 ---

    3 Hawthorne Boulevard/ AM 0.873 D 0.934 E 0.989 E 0.995 E 0.006 NO 0.995 E 0.006 ---Palos Verdes Drive North PM 0.817 D 0.874 D 0.942 E 0.946 E 0.004 NO 0.946 E 0.004 ---

    4 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.907 E 0.970 E 1.097 F 1.097 F 0.000 NO 1.097 F 0.000 ---Sepulveda Boulevard PM 0.966 E 1.033 F 1.143 F 1.143 F 0.000 NO 1.143 F 0.000 ---

    5 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.927 E 0.992 E 1.066 F 1.069 F 0.003 NO 1.069 F 0.003 ---Lomita Boulevard PM 1.117 F 1.195 F 1.296 F 1.300 F 0.004 NO 1.300 F 0.004 ---

    6 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.988 E 1.057 F 1.135 F 1.139 F 0.004 NO 1.139 F 0.004 ---Pacific Coast Highway PM 1.070 F 1.145 F 1.264 F 1.271 F 0.007 NO 1.271 F 0.007 ---

    7 Crenshaw Boulevard/ AM 0.776 C 0.830 D 0.877 D 0.892 D 0.015 NO 0.892 D 0.015 ---Palos Verdes Drive North PM 0.713 C 0.763 C 0.835 D 0.846 D 0.011 NO 0.846 D 0.011 ---

    8 Arlington Avenue/ AM 0.896 D 0.959 E 0.994 E 0.997 E 0.003 NO 0.997 E 0.003 ---Lomita Boulevard PM 0.989 E 1.059 F 1.109 F 1.112 F 0.003 NO 1.112 F 0.003 ---

    [a] As a related project, the Mary Star by the Sea High School project access is via Taper Avenue. City of Los Angeles intersection impact threshold criteria is as follows:Final v/c LOS Project Related Increase in v/c

    > 0.700 - 0.800 C equal to or greater than 0.040> 0.800 - 0.900 D equal to or greater than 0.020

    > 0.900 E,F equal to or greater than 0.010

    Run LOS

    Print

  • Table E-3 (Continued)SUMMARY OF VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIOS

    AND LEVELS OF SERVICEAM AND PM PEAK HOURS

    LADOT ANALYSIS - ALTERNATIVE E

    20-Sep-06

    [1] [2] [4a] [4b] [5]YEAR 2012 YEAR 2012

    YEAR 2012 FUTURE FUTURE YEAR 2012YEAR 2005 W/ AMBIENT PRE-PROJECT WITH CHANGE SIGNIF. W/ PROJECT CHANGE MITI-

    PEAK EXISTING GROWTH W/ MARY STAR [a] ALTERNATIVE E V/C IMPACT MITIGATION V/C GATEDNO. INTERSECTION HOUR V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS [(4b)-(4a)] V/C LOS [(5)-(4a)]

    9 Narbonne Avenue/ AM 0.892 D 0.955 E 1.035 F 1.039 F 0.004 NO 1.039 F 0.004 ---Pacific Coast Highway PM 0.793 C 0.848 D 0.932 E 0.936 E 0.004 NO 0.936 E 0.004 ---

    10 Palos Verdes Drive East/ AM 0.777 C 0.831 D 0.919 E 0.931 E 0.012 YES 0.847 D -0.072 YESPalos Verdes Drive North PM 0.688 B 0.736 C 0.785 C 0.797 C 0.012 NO 0.786 C 0.001 ---

    11 Western Avenue/ AM 0.829 D 0.892 D 1.013 F 1.017 F 0.004 NO 1.017 F 0.004 ---Sepulveda Boulevard [b] PM 0.945 E 1.016 F 1.157 F 1.165 F 0.008 NO 1.165 F 0.008 ---

    12 Western Avenue/ AM 0.982 E 1.051 F 1.157 F 1.173 F 0.016 YES 1.073 F -0.084 YESLomita Boulevard PM 1.106 F 1.184 F 1.349 F 1.371 F 0.022 YES 1.271 F -0.078 YES

    13 Western Avenue/ AM 0.903 E 0.941 E 1.088 F 1.128 F 0.040 YES 1.059 F -0.029 YESPacific Coast Highway [c] PM 0.969 E 1.012 F 1.216 F 1.256 F 0.040 YES 1.182 F -0.034 YES

    14 Western Avenue/ AM 0.607 B 0.650 B 0.770 C 0.798 C 0.028 NO 0.798 C 0.028 ---Anaheim Street PM 0.545 A 0.583 A 0.699 B 0.738 C 0.039 NO 0.738 C 0.039 ---

    15 Western Avenue/ AM 1.031 F 1.103 F 1.322 F 1.506 F 0.184 YES 1.250 F -0.072 YESPalos Verdes Drive North PM 1.025 F 1.097 F 1.155 F 1.274