Appendix This appendix was part of the submitted ...
Transcript of Appendix This appendix was part of the submitted ...
1
SupplementarymaterialLegends:
SupplementaryTable1.PRISMA-Protocol(PreferredReportingItemsforSystematicreviewandMeta-AnalysisProtocols)2015checklist(Pages2-4)
SupplementaryFigure1:Riskofbiassummary:reviewauthors'judgementsabouteachriskofbiasitemforeachincludedstudy.(Page-5)
SupplementaryFigure2:Riskofbiasgraph:reviewauthors'judgementsabouteachriskofbiasitempresentedaspercentagesacrossallincludedstudies.(Page5)
SupplementaryFigure3:ForestPlotofriskratiosofmortalityinthehypothermiatreatmentgroupversusnormothermiagroupforadultstudies(NT=Normothermia,HT=Hypothermia).(Page6)
SupplementaryTable2.SearchtermsbasedonPICOstructure.(Page7)
SupplementaryTable3.Summaryofstudiesthatevaluatedeffectoftherapeutichypothermiaontraumaticbraininjury.(Pages8-11)
SupplementaryTable4.Summaryofstudiesthatevaluatedeffectoftherapeutichypothermiaonpatientswithstroke.(Pages12-13)
SupplementaryTable5.Summaryofstudiesthatevaluatedeffectoftherapeutichypothermiaonpatientswithout-of-hospitalcardiacarrest.(Pages14-15)
SupplementaryTable6.SummaryofstudiesthatevaluatedeffectoftherapeutichypothermiaonpatientswhounderwentCABG.(Pages16-19)
SupplementaryTable7.Summaryofstudiesthatevaluatedeffectoftherapeutichypothermiaonpatientswithotherformsofcriticalcareillnesses.(Pages20-23)
SupplementaryTable8.Summaryofbaselinecharacteristicsofallstudiesincludedinthismeta-analysis.(Pages24-26)
SupplementaryTable9.Riskofbiassummary.(Page27)
SupplementaryFigure4(A-E)Funnelplotstoinvestigateevidenceofpublicationbiasforeachsubgroup:Traumaticbraininjury(A),Stroke(B),Outofhospitalcardiacarrest(C),intra-operativecardiacpulmonarybypass(D)andothers(E).Intheabsenceofpublicationbias,thepatternofpointsshouldresembleaninvertedfunnel (Pages28-30)
PRISMAChecklist(Pages31-32)
AppendixThis appendix was part of the submitted manuscript and has been peer reviewed. It is posted as supplied by the authors.
2
Section and topic Item No
Checklist item
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION Title:
Identification 1a Therapeutic Hypothermia and Mortality in the Intensive Care unit: Systematic review and Meta-analysis Update 1b This protocol is not for an update of a previous systematic review.
Registration 2 Not registered Authors:
Contact 3a Shehabaldin Alqalyoobi, MD1 ([email protected]) Noelle Boctor, MD2 ([email protected]) Amir A. Sarkeshik, DO3 ([email protected]) Joshua Hoerger, MD2 ([email protected]) Nicholas Klimberg, MD2 ([email protected]) Brittany G. Bartolome, MD2 ([email protected]) Susan L. Stewart, PhD4 ([email protected]@ucdavis.edu) Timothy E. Albertson, MD, MPH, PhD5,6 ([email protected]) 1 Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine Division, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States 2 Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, United States 3 Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, United States 4 Division of Biostatistics, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, United States 5 Veteran Affairs Northern California Healthcare System, Mather, CA, United States 6 Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine Division, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, United States
Contributions 3b Clinical data acquisition (Data extraction and bias assessment): SA, AS, NB, JH, NK, BB, TA. Study design: SA, AA, SS, TA. Data analysis: SA, SS, TA. Interpretation of results: SA, AS, NB, JH, NK, BB, SS, TA. Manuscript preparation and review: SA, SS, TA. All authors reviewed, revised, and approved the manuscript for submission.
Amendments 4 This protocol does not represent an amendment of a previously completed or published protocol. Support:
Sources 5a No sources of financial or other support for the review Sponsor 5b No review funder and/or sponsor Role of sponsor or funder 5c Not applicable
INTRODUCTION Rationale 6 Therapeutic Hypothermia (TH) is defined as the designed reduction of the human body's core temperature to 32°C–35°C for the duration of 24-48
hours. TH has been studied extensively in many diseases related to critical care illness in the past decades with controversial results when it comes to mortality as an outcome. In this meta-analysis, the effect of TH on mortality across different indications in medical, neurological and cardiothoracic care is assessed.
Objectives 7 Whether Therapeutic Hypothermia (TH) is superior to conventional Normothermia in patients with different critical care illnesses. Patients population: Patients with acute stroke, out of hospital cardiac arrest, traumatic brain injury, coronary artery bypass surgery and other critical care diseases. Intervention: Therapeutic Hypothermia defined as: the designed reduction of the human body's core temperature to < 37°C duration of 24-72 hours. Comperator: Normothermia convention therapy. Outcome: All-cause mortality
3
METHODS Eligibility criteria 8 Only published randomized controlled trials (Trials) between January, 1940 to October, 2018, in English or foreign language with translation were
included in this study. Studies that had the following PICO question: 1- Patients population: Patients with acute stroke, out of hospital cardiac arrest, traumatic brain injury, coronary artery bypass surgery and other
critical care diseases. 2- Intervention: Therapeutic Hypothermia defined as: the designed reduction of the human body's core temperature to < 37°C duration of 24-72
hours in ICU setting. 3- Comparator: Normothermia convention therapy. 4- Outcome: All-cause mortality.
Information sources 9 Data will be collected from electronic databases Search strategy 10
Study records:
Data management 11a Data will be managed using the following software: Endnote X8, Microsoft Excel and Review Manager 5.3 Selection process 11b Screening process: two independent reviewers.
Eligibility and Inclusion in meta-analysis process: two independent reviewers. Data collection process 11c Data extraction: two independent reviewers.
Data confirmation: performed by a third different independent author, not involved in the data extraction. Data items 12 1- Patients population: Patients with acute stroke, out of hospital cardiac arrest, traumatic brain injury, coronary artery bypass surgery and other
critical care diseases. 2- Intervention: Therapeutic Hypothermia defined as: the designed reduction of the human body's core temperature to < 37°C duration of 24-72
hours in ICU setting. 3- Comparator: Normothermia convention therapy. 4- Outcome: All-cause mortality.
Other items collected: Male percentage, age mean, patient size for each study, method of cooling, methods of cooling, neuroprotection if mentioned in the study, mean temperature achieved in normothermia and conventional hypothermia group.
Outcomes and prioritization 13 All-cause mortality Risk of bias in individual studies 14 Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool will be used. Two independent authors assessed the risk of bias for each study and discrepancies will be
resolved by consensus between both authors. Data synthesis 15a If studies are sufficiently homogeneous in terms of design and comparator, we will conduct meta-analyses using a random-effects model
4
e-Table1.PRISMA-Protocol(PreferredReportingItemsforSystematicreviewandMeta-AnalysisProtocols)2015checklist
15b Forall-causemortality, we will calculate pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated with 95% CIs by the random effect model for analyses Statistical heterogeneity will be tested using the Chi2 test (significance level: 0.1) and I2 statistic (0% to 40%: might not be important; 30% to 60%: may represent moderate heterogeneity; 50% to 90%: may represent substantial heterogeneity; 75% to 100%: considerable heterogeneity). If high levels of heterogeneity among the trials exist (I2 >=50% or P <0.1) the study design and characteristics in the included studies will be analysed.
15c Meta-regression was performed to adjust for possible confounders. 15d A systematic narrative synthesis will be provided with information presented in tables to summarize and explain the characteristics and findings of
the included studies Meta-bias(es) 16 In order to determine whether publication bias is present, we will use Funnel plot for evaluation Confidence in cumulative evidence
17 We didn’t evaluate the strength of the body of evidence using any tool(such as GRADE)
5
SupplementaryFigure1:Riskofbiassummary:reviewauthors'judgementsabouteachriskofbiasitemforeachincludedstudy
SupplementaryFigure2:Riskofbiasgraph:reviewauthors'judgementsabouteachriskofbiasitempresentedaspercentagesacrossallincludedstudies.
6
SupplementaryFigure3:ForestPlotofriskratiosofmortalityinthehypothermiatreatmentgroupversusnormothermiagroupforadultstudies(NT=Normothermia,HT=Hypothermia)
7
Database Population Search term
Intervention search term
Comparator search term
Outcome search term
Embase Adult or aged AND humans
Induced Hypothermia
No specific comparator was
used.
Specific outcomes are not specified in the search strategy
to avoid missing any related outcomes
listed in the articles
Ovid MEDLINE All adult (19 plus years) AMD humans
Induced Hypothermia or
Therapeutic hypothermia
CINAHL humans AND adult
(MH "Hypothermia, Induced")
TRIP
Adult induced
hypothermia
e-Table2.SearchtermsbasedonPICOstructu
8
Study Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria Intervention Outcome: Mortality Outcome: Neuroprotective Outcome: Comments Follow up Normothermia Hypothermia Normothermia Hypothermia
Aibiki 2000 GCS less than or equal to 8, evidence of injury on CT
Patients with abdominal or chest trauma, patients with severe pulmonary infection, admitted in hospital more than 8 hours after injury
hypothermia induced (32-33C)within 3-4 hours of injury with surface cooling after midazolam, vecuronium and buprenorphine
3/11 (27.%) 1/15 (6.7%) 3/11 (27.%) 8/15 (53.3%) Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery per GOS
6 months
Andrews 2015
Patient that meets the following criteria Age legal for consent, primary/closed TBI, ICP>20mmgHg for at least 5 minutes after stage 1 treatements without obvious reversible cause, initial head injury no more than 10 days prior, availablility of cooling device for more than 48 hours, core temp at least 36C, abnormal CT head
Patients already receiving therapeutic hypothermia or unlikely to survive for next 24 hours, getting barbiturate infusion before randomization, temp of 34C or less on admission, prenancy
hypothermia induced by bolus of IV, refrigerated 0.9% NS (20-30ml/kg), core temp reduced by minimum required to maintain ICP of 20mmHg or less for limits 32-35C, stage 2 treatments (mannitol, hypertonic saline, inotropes) added if hypothermia failed, stage 3 added (barbiturate, compressive craniectomy) if stage 2 failed
51/192 (26.6%) 68/195 (34.9%)
69/192 (36.5%) 49/195 (25.7%)
Favorable outcome is defined Glasgow Outcome Scale – Extended (GOS-E score 5-8)
6 months
Clifton 1993
Patients ages 16 to 60 years with post-resuscitation GCS of 4 to 7 after non-penetrating brain injury
Any of the following: Hypoxia (02 saturation < 94% for > 30 min), Major systemic injuries requiring laparotomy, pulmonary failure, or sustained hypotension (systolic blood pressure =s 90 mmHg for > 2 h)
Surface Cooling: Started within 6 h of injury by use of cooling blankets. Rewarming was at a rate of 1°C per 4 h beginning 48 h after intravascular temperature had reached 33°C. Metocurine and morphine were given hourly during induction and maintenance of hypothermia. Muscle relaxants and sedation were continued until core temperature reached 35°C.
8/22 (36.4%) 8/23 (35%) 8/22 (36.4%) 12/23 (52.2 %)
Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery/Moderate Disability per GOS
3 months
Clifton 2001
Patient wit age of 16 to 65 years, a nonpenetrating head injury, and a score on the Glasgow Coma Scale of 3 to 8 after resuscitation. A score on the Glasgow Coma Scale of 15 signifies normal mental status, and a score of 8 or less signifies coma. A score of 5 to 8 denotes flexor withdrawal or pur- poseful response to pain, 4 denotes extensor posturing, and 3 denotes no motor response
Excluded if they had a score of 3 with unreactive pupils, a life-threatening injury to an organ other than the brain, a systolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg after resuscitation, oxygen saturation of less than 94 percent after re- suscitation, bleeding, pregnancy, or known preexisting medical con- ditions (e.g., severe heart disease) or if the examiners were unable to initiate cooling within six hours after injury.
Surface cooling with target themperature of 33 within 6 hours for 48 hours
48/178 (27%) 53/190 (28%) 76/178 (43%) 82/190 (43%)
Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery/Moderate Disability per GOS
6 months
Clifton 2011
Inclusion criteria were age 16–45 years, non-penetrating brain injury, and not responsive to instructions.
2 sets of exclusion, initially, patients were excluded if they had suspected pregnancy, systolic blood pressure less than 110 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure less than 60 mm Hg, sustained heart rate greater than 120 beats per minute, or if they could not be reached by study-affiliated personnel within 2·5 h of injury. Second set: patients
Surface cooling with target temperature of 33 for 48 hours. Hypothermia initiated in after 1.6 hrs (Mean).
8/45 (18%) 12/52 (23.1%) 20/45 (44%) had a poor
211/52 (40%)
Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery/Moderate Disability per GOS
6 months
9
with Glasgow coma scale score of 3 with nonreactive pupils, Glasgow coma scale score of 7–8 with normal brain CT scan, inability to measure an accurate Glasgow coma scale score, abbreviated injury severity score of 4 or greater for organs other than the brain, systolic blood pressure less than 110 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure less than 60 mm Hg, persistent hypoxia
Cooper 2018
Patients with head injuries were estimated to be aged 18 to 60 years, had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of less than 9, and had actual or imminent endo- tracheal intubation
Patients with significant bleeding suggested by systolic hypo- tension (<90 mm Hg) or sustained tachycardia (>120/min), suspected pregnancy, possible uncontrolled bleeding, Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 and unreactive pupils, or destination hospital not a study site.
Hypothermi induction with bolus of up to 2000 mL intravenous ice-cold, then maintaining the temperature with Gaymar Meditherm 3 console with surface-cooling wraps for at least 72
44/239 (18.4%) 54/256 (21.1%)
111/226 (49.1%) 117/240 (48.8%)
Favorable outcome is defined Glasgow Outcome Scale – Extended (GOS-E score 5-8)
6 months
Gal 2002
Paients with severe head injuries with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3-8 were enrolled into the study.
Unclear: Everyone who does not meet the inclusion criteria.
Surface cooling with target temperature of 34 within 15 hours for 72 hours.
5/15 (33%) 2/15 (13%) 7/15 (47%) 13/15 (87%)
Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery/Moderate Disability per GOS
6 months
Harris 2009
GCS less than or equal to 8, treated for severe TBI, 18 yo, patient ablet o receive hypothermia cooling cap within 48 hours of admission, patient family spoke Enlish, informed consent obtained
patient family unwilling/unable to sign consent, physical placement of cooling cap impeded, patient's core body temp less than or equal to 36C at initial assessment, unable to initial treatment within 48 hours
Cooling cap: compression settin gof 15mmHg, goal intracranial temp 33C for 24 hours
4/13(30.8%) 6/12 (50%) 0/13 (0%) 0/12 (0%)
Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery/Moderate Disability per GOS
28 days
Hashiguchi 2003
Patients with Glasgow Coma Scale score for each patient at admission was 8 or less in whom ICP was maintained below 20 mm Hg by conven- tional therapy
Patients younger than 10 years of age were excluded from the study or in whom ICP was not maintained below 20 mm Hg by conven- tional therapy
Surface cooling with target temperature of 34 for 48 hours. Unclear the time of cooling initiation.
0/8 (0%) 1/9 (11%) 5/9 (55.6%) 5/9 (55.6%)
Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery category per GOS
6 months
Jiang 2000 Patients with severe TBI (GCS27 score less than or equal to 8)
Unclear: Everyone who does not meet the inclusion criteria.
Surface cooling for 3-14 days, with target temperature of 33-35. Hypothermia initiation was within 15 hrs (mean)
20/44 (45.45%) 11/43 (25.58%)
12/44 (27.27%) 20 /43 (46.51%)
Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery/Moderate Disability per GOS
12 months
Lee 2010
Patients with a history of TBI; Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 4–8; and brain damage confirmed by sequential computed tomography (CT) scanning within 6 hours after trauma.
Patients who are pregnant women; patients younger than age 12 years or older than age 70 years; a GCS score of 3; multiply injured patients; and those with any previous disabling neuro- logic disease.
Surface cooling with target temperature of 33-35. Unclear procedural duration. Unclear time for the initiation.
2/16 (12.5%) 1/15(6.7%) 8/16 (50%) 9/15 (60%)
Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery/Moderate Disability per GOS
6 months
Liu 2006
history of TBI, Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8 at admission, and brain injury apparent on sequential computed tomography within 1 – 24 h (mean 8.6 h) of admission.
Unclear: Everyone who does not meet the inclusion criteria.
Surface cooling with target temperature of 33-35 for 72 hours. Hypothermia started after 8.6 hours (mean)
12/23 (52.2%) 6/21 (28.6%) 6/23 (26.1%) 11/21 (52.4%) Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery per GOS
24 months
10
Maekawa 2015
Age 15–69 years for both sexes, GCS score of 4–8, and ability to initiate cooling within 2 h after the onset of TBI.
Any of the following were excluded: good motor response (GCS motor response = 6), systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg after fluid and vasopressor resuscitation, platelet count < 50,000 /mm3, severe pre-existing medical conditions (e.g., liver, kidney, or heart failure, or severe arrhythmia), acute myocardial infarction, pregnancy, severe alcohol intoxication that prevented assessment of consciousness, penetrating brain injury, epidural hematoma without brain parenchymal injury, or core body tem- perature <30°C.
Surface Cooling and Endovascular cooling: Cooling blankets, rapid cold fluid infusion (up to 1000 mL saline, human plasma products, or dextrose-free plasma expanders), and/or cold gastric lavage were used to achieve a tartget temperature of within 6 hours for ≥72 hours
11/48 (23%) 33/94(35%) 25/48 (52%) 44/94(47%)
Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery/Moderate Disability per GOS
6 months
Marion 1993
Patients were included in the study if they were between 16 and 75 years of age and had a closed head injury and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)score of 3 to 7 upon admission to the emergency department.
Patients were excluded if there were normal findings on computerized tomography (CT) of the head, pro- longed hypotension with a systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg for over 30 minutes, or prolonged hypoxia with arterial O2 saturation less than 94% for over 30 minutes, if the patient arrived at our hospital more than 6 hours after injury, if a family member refused to consent to the study, or in cases of pregnancy.
Surface cooling: using cooling blankets and cold saline gastric lavage, Cooling was initiated with target temperature of 33 within 6 hours for 24 hours.
2/20 (1%) 0/20 (0%) 8/20 (40%) 12/20 (60%)
Good neurological outcome was defined as moderate, mild, or no disabilities per GOS
3 months
Marion 1997
Patient who had closed head injury and a Glasgow coma score of 3 to 7, an age of 16 to 75 years, admission within six hours after the injury, and an in- ability to follow commands.
Patients were excluded for the fol- lowing reasons: clinical brain death (a score of 3 on the Glasgow Coma Scale and no brain-stem reflexes), prolonged hypoxia or hypotension, a gunshot wound, pregnancy, an undetermined time of injury, or normal findings on a computed tomographic (CT) scan of the head.
Surface cooling: using cooling blankets and cold saline nasogastric lavage, Cooling was initiated with target temperature of 33 within 6 hours for 24 hours.
10/42 (24%) 9/39 (23%) 16/42 (38%) 24/39 (62%)
Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery/Moderate Disability per GOS
12 months
Qiu 2007
Patient with a history of TBI, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 8 or less, brain injury confirmed by sequential computed tomography (CT) scanning within 6 hours after trauma.
Patients who had one or more of the following criteria were excluded from the study: pregnant women,patients younger than 19 or older than 65 years, multiply injured patients, those with hemorrhagic shock, or without any brain stem reflex on initial examination, those with any previous disabling neurologic disease.
Surface cooling with target temperature of 33-35 for 72 hours.
13/40 (32.5%) 9/40 (22.5%) 19/40 (47.5%) 28/40 (70%) )
Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery/Moderate Disability per GOS
12 months
Shiozaki 1993
Patients with Severe TBI, Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 8 or less in whom the ICP remained higher than 20 mm Hg at 5 to 6 hours after induction of high-dose barbiturate therapy were eligible for inclusion in this study.
Patient below younger than 10 years or who didn't meet the inclusion criteria
Surface cooling with target body temperature of 33.5-34.5, unclear time until hypothermia. Duration of cooling was for 24-48 hours.
14/17(82%) 8/16(50%) 1/17 (5.9%) 5/16 (31%)
Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery category per GOS
6 months
11
e-Table3.Summaryofstudiesthatevaluatedeffectoftherapeutichypothermiaontraumaticbraininjury.
Shiozaki 1999
Patients with Severe TBI, Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 8 or less in whom the ICP was below 20 mm Hg.
Patient below younger than 10 years or who didn't meet the inclusion criteria
Surface cooling for 48 hours, unclear initiation time. Target temperature was 34.
0/8 (0%) 0/8 (0%) 7/8 (87.5%) 6/8 (75%)
Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery/Moderate Disability per GOS
6 months
Shizoki 2001
patients had a GCS9 score of 8 or less on admission, and none had a severe life-threatening injury to another organ with ICP below 25 with conventional therapies
Patient with ICP > 25 mm Hg despite conventional therapies , ICP was not measured or informed consent was not obtained
Surface cooling for 48 hours, with target temperature of 34.5-35.5. Unclear when was the hypothermia was initiated
6/46 (13%) 8/45(18%) 18/46 14/45
Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery category per GOS
3 months
Tang 2017
ICP >20mmHg after decompressive craniectomy within 24 hours, primary closed TBI, >16 yo, men or non-pregnant women, clear history of head injury, GCS 3-8 on admission or after resuscitation, availablilty of cooling device for >72 hours, brain injury confirmed by CT within 6 hours of trauma
pregnancy, <16 yo, >70yo, multiple injuryeis, hemorrhagic schok, no bilateral pupil fixed on exam, no spontaneous breating, bilaterla hemicraniectom yor bfrontal craniectomy, external ventricular drainage, history o fserious heart, lung , brain and other diseases
Water circulating cooling blanket, goal 32-35C then rewarming considered 48 hours later
(10/30) 33.3% (3/30) 10% 7/30 (36.5%) 12/30 (40%)
Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery/Moderate Disability per GOS
6 months
Zhao 2011
Patients older than 16 years; had admission within 6 hours of nonpenetrating brain injury; a score on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) between 3 and 8 after resuscitation and no other chronic illnesses before the injury.
Patients who had life- threatening injuries to other organs or systolic blood pressure less than 70 mm Hg after resuscitation were excluded.
Surface cooling: using cooling blankets, Cooling was initiated with target temperature of 33 within 3-5 hours for 72 hours.
4/41 (9.8%) 1/40(2.5%) 21/41 (51%) 30/40 (75%)
Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery/Moderate Disability per GOS
3 months
Zhi 2003
Patients with acute severe head injury [Glasgow Coma Scale Score (GCS) equal to or less than 8] within 24 hours after trauma, uncomplicated with major organ damage or functional failure, and without hypotension (systolic pressure 90 mm Hg).
Unclear: Everyone who does not meet the inclusion criteria.
Surface Cooling: Water circulating cooling blanket with target temperature of 32.0 to 35.0°C within 24 hours for 1-7 days
72/198 (36.4%) 51/198 (26.7%)
75/198 (38%) 122/198 (62%)
Favourable out come was considered as Good Recovery/Moderate Disability per GOS
6 months
12
Study Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria Intervention Outcome: Mortality Outcome: Neuroprotective Outcome: Comments
Follow up Normothermia Hypothermia Normothermia Hypothermia
De Georgia 2004
Patients were older than 18 years, had anterior circulation territory ischemic stroke, had an NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of equal to or more than 8 and less than or equal to 25, and presented within 12 hours of symptom onset.
Patients with recent sepsis; contraindication to MRI; platelet count of less than 75,000/mm3; known coagulopathy; significant ventricular cardiac dysrhythmias or QTc interval of more than 450 milli- seconds; pregnancy; intolerance to buspirone or meperidine; treatment with monoamine oxidase inhibitors; life expectancy of less than 6 months; baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of more than 2; rapidly improving symptoms; intracerebral hemorrhage, mass, or aneurysm by brain CT scan; hypersensitivity to hypothermia; height of less than 1.5 m; inferior vena cava filter in place; and renal insufficiency. Patients returned for a clinical assessment at 30 + 7 days including mRS and NIHSS scores (the NIHSS score was corrected for side of stroke by adding 5 to the NIHSS score in patients with right hemispheric strokes)
Endovascular cooling with target temperature of 33 for 24 hours. The initiation of cooling started within < 12 hours
4/22(18%) 5/18 (28%) Mean NIHSS score: 20.3
Mean NIHSS score: 19.2
Mean NIHSS score was used
1 month
Els 2005 Patients who typical clinical signs for a large supratentorial infarction (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale Score, NIHSSS, more than 15 for right-hemispheric stroke and NIHSSS more than 20 for left-hemispheric stroke), signal changes in early diffusion-weighted and perfusion-weighted MRI involving 12/3 of the hemisphere without mismatch, age is less than 65 years, no preexisting disability (Karnofsky Performance Status 170), no dementia and no tegmental syndrome. The extent of infarction was evaluated on the basis of the initial diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI.
Unclear: Everyone who does not meet the inclusion criteria.
Endovascular cooling with target temperature of 35 for 48 hours.
2/13 (15%) in Hemicraniotomy Only
1/12 (8%) in Hemicraniotomy with Hypothermia
NIHSSS after 6 months: 11±3 Hemicraniotomy Only
NIHSSS after 6 months: 10±1 in Hemicraniotomy with Hypothermia
No significant difference in mortality between Hemicraniotomy alone (15%- 2/13) and Hypothermia and hemicraniotomy group (8%-1/12)
3 months
13
Hemmen 2010 Patients who presented with acute ischemic stroke less than six hours from onset, age 18–80, an National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 7, and a score of 0 or 1 on NIHSS Item 1a (arousal) at the time of cooling catheter placement. The institutional review boards of the participating centers approved this protocol.
Unable to extract, any patients who does not meet the inclusion criteria.
Endovascular cooling with target temperature of 33 for 24 hours. Hypothermia initiated in < 6 hours.
5/30 (16.7%) 6/28 (21.4%) 7/30 (24%) 5/28 (18%) modified Rankin Scale (mRS) used as surrogate for neuroprotection (score of 0 to 1) No significant difference in mortality between Hypothermia and Normothermia
3 months
Lyden 2016 Patients presented with ischemic stroke patients treated within 3 hours of symptom onset with intravenous r-tPA, NIHSS >=7 and <=20 for L brain stroke or <=24 for R brain stroke, 22-82yo
Unable to extract, patients who do not meet inclusion criteria
Hypothermia obtained by saline infusions and Intravascular Cooling in the treatmetn of Stroke Protocol
5/57 (8.8%) 10/63 (15.9%) 21/57 (38%) 21/63 (33%) modified Rankin Scale (mRS) used as surrogate for neuroprotection (score of 0 to 1) No significant difference in mortality between Hypothermia and Normothermia
3 months
Piironen 2014 Patients (aged, 18–85 years) with moderate to severe neurological symp- toms (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS], 7–20 or NIHSS <7 with >2 points from motor score of a single limb, or >1 points for aphasia) 1 hour after initiation of intravenous thrombolysis.
Patients with severe congestive cardiac failure, recent history of unstable angina pectoris or sepsis, intracranial hem- orrhage or tumor on computed tomographic (CT) scan, pregnancy, hemodynamic instability, severe thrombocytopenia, pre-existing neurological disability with modi ed Ranking Scale (mRS) >2, or violation of the in-house guidelines of thrombolytic therapy
Surface Cooling with target temperature of 35 within 6 hours for 12 hours
2/18 (%) 0/18 (0%) 7/18 (39%) 7/18 (39%) Good outcome was considered as modified Ranking Scale: 0–2
3 Months
Su 2015 age 18-80, acute unilateral ischemic stroke <=48 hours ago, infarction involving at least 2/3 MCA territory on CT or MRI, NIHSS score>=15 if non-dominant hemisphere affected or >=20 if dominant hemisphere, reduced level of consciousness (NIHSS item 1a score>=1), unable to undergo decompressive craniectomy becasue of premorbid use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant
premorbid modified Rankin Scale >=2, secondary hemorrhage involving more than 1/2 of infarction territory with space-occupying effect, GCS without a verbal response item score of <6, rapidly improving symptoms, both puils fixed and dilated, simultaneous other brain lesion, plts <75,000, severe coagulopathy or cardiac/liver/kidney disease, vasospastic disease/hematological disease with increased risk of thormobosis/paramyotonia congenita, sepsis, premorbid treatemtn with a MAOI or allergy to pethidine, IVC fistula or filter or mass near inferior VCA, pregnancy, life expectancy <6 months
Endovascular hypothermia via CVC inserted in teh femoral vein for target bladder temp 33-34C for minimum of 24 hours up to 72 hours
7/17 (41.2%) 8/16 (50%) 4/17 (23.5%) 7/16 (43.8%) Good neurological outcome was modified Rankin Score 1 to 3
6 months
e-Table4.Summaryofstudiesthatevaluatedeffectoftherapeutichypothermiaonpatientswithstroke.
14
Study Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Intervention Outcome: Mortality Outcome: Neuroprotective Outcome: Comments
Follow up
Normothermia Hypothermia Normothermia Hypothermia Bernard 2002
initial cardiac rhythm of Vfib at the time of arrival of ambulance, successful ROSC, persistent coma after ROSC, trasnfer to 1/4 participating EDs
age <18 for men, age<50 for women, cardiogenic shock (SBP <90 despite epinephrine), other possible explanation for coma, no ICU bed available
hypothermia to 33C within 2 hrs of RSOC and maintained temp for 12 hours (basic cooling in ambulance then vigorous cooling with ice packs around head, neck , torso, limbs
23/34 22/43 9/34 (26%) 21/43 (49%) Good outcome considered discharged to home or rehab
24hours?
Bernard 2016
>=18 yo, cardiac arrest on EMS arrival, had IV access estabilshed, still in cardiac arrest after initial resuscitation
in cardiac arrest because of trauma, suspected intracranial bleed, females known or suspected to be pregnant, already hypothermic (<34.5C), inpatients, konwn advanced directives for limited resuscitation
Rapid intravenous infusion of up to 2L cold saline
66/580 (11.4%)
63/618 (10.2%)
63/580 63/618 No note of "good neuro outcome" but considered it patients who were discharge home or rehab
until hospital discharge
Cronberg 2015
unconscious (GCS<8), adults (>=18yo), out-of hospital cardiac arrest from presumed cardiac cause, sustained ROSC
interval from ROSC to screening time >240mins, unwitnessed cardiac arrest with asystole as initial rhythm, suspected or known intracranial hemorrhage or stroke, body temp <30C
Temp goal 33C vs 36C
246/466 245/473 unclear unclear No note of "good neuro outcome" but can use occupational status at time of follow up?
6 months
Hachimi-Idrissi 2001
patients with cardiac arrest due to asystole or PEA who remained unconscious after ROSC, over 18yo, tympanic temp >30C on admission, GCS <7, SBP>100, MAP>60
pregnancy, coagulopathy, hx of CNS depressant drug prior to cardiac arrest
helmet device used to induce hypothermia to 34C
13/14 13/16 unclear unclear not assessed but lower lactate concentration and O2 extraction lower was positive
6 months
Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group 2002
witnessed cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation or nonperfusing ventricular tachycardia as intial rhythm, age 18-75 yo,
tympanic temp <30C on admission, comatose state before cardiac arrest from drugs that depress CNS, pregnancy,
therapeutic hypothermia to 32-34C
76/138 (55%) 56/137 (41%)
54/137 (39%) 75/135 (55%)
favorable neuro outcome defined as cerebral performance category 1 or 2
6 months
15
presumed cardiac origin of arrest, estimated interval of 5-15 mins from pathient's collapse to first resuscitatino attempt by EMS, interval <60 mins from collapse to ROSC
response to verbal commands after ROSC, hypotension for >60mmHg, evidence of hypoxemia for >15mins after ROSC, terminal illness before arrest, enrolled in another study, occurrence of cardic arrest after arrival of emergency medical personnel
Kamarainen 2009
patients >=18 yo, time to ROSC >9mins, GCS <=5
pregnancy, cardiac arrest due to trauma or intoxication, persistent intital hypotension after ROSC (SBP<100mmHg) not responding to fluid challenge or medication
IV infusion of 4 degrees Celcius of Ringer's solution
10/18 11/19 unclear unclear
until hospital discharge
Kim 2014 ROSC, tracheal intubation, IV access, succesful placement of esophageal temp prob, unconsciousness
traumatic cardiac arrest, <18yo, awake, following commands, temp <34C
infusion of up to 2L of 4 degree C normal saline as soon as possible folloing ROSC
422/671 429/688 231/671 225/688 favorable neurologic outcome was full recovery or mildly impaired
until hospital discharge
Laurent 2005 age 18-75, initial Vfib or asystole, estimated interval of <10mins from cardiac arrest to initiation of CPR, interval of <50min from initiation of CPR to ROSC
pregnancy, response to verbal commands after ROSC, terminal illness present before cardiac arrest
cooling of the hemofiltration substitution fluid
15/19 15/22 4/19 7/22 favorable neurologic outcome was Pittsburgh cerebral performac category 1 (good recovery) or 2 (moderate disabtility)
6 months
Nielsen 2013 age 18 or older, GCS<8, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from presumed cardiac cause, 20 consecutive mins of spontaneous circulation after resuscitation
interval from ROSC to screening time >240mins, unwitnessed cardiac arrest with asystole as initial rhythm, suspected or known intracranial hemorrhage or stroke, body temp <30C
achievement of temp 33C as quickly as possible using ice-cold fluids, ice packs and intravascular/surface temperature-management devices
220/466 226/473 225/464 218/469 favorable neurologic outcome was Cerebral Performance Category 1-2
180 days
e-Table5.Summaryofstudiesthatevaluatedeffectoftherapeutichypothermiaonpatientswithout-of-hospitalcardiacarrest
16
Study Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria Intervention Outcome: Mortality Outcome:
Mortality Outcome: Neuroprotective
Outcome: Neuroprotective
Outcome: Comments Follow up
Arom 1995 patients undergoing elective, urgent, emergent, redo, CABG, valve and CABG/valve operations
Not Discussed blood cardioplegia solution, allowing temperature of intervention patients to drift down to 34C but controls kept at 37C
4% 3% 99/100 100/100 Did not define objective way of measuring CVA (based on clinical, no CT evidence of CVA); Hypothermic group had better UOP; Hypothermic group required less post-op volume (p-0.001)
Hospital discharge
Bert 1993 patients scheduled to undergo elective isolated coronary artery bypass graft operations, patients with triple vessel disease with a significant stenosis (>=70%) of the right coronary artery
Patients without significant stenosis of RCA (>70%); Patietns that were diagnosed with myocardial ischemia before start of CPB (hemodynamic profile changes).
moderate hypothermic perfusion at bladder temperature 25C
0/16 (0%) 0/14 (0%) not mentioned not mentioned not mentioned RV function 24 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass
Birdi 1997 Patients in need of primary isolated coronary revascularization
Previous history of stroke or transient ischemic episodes
CPB Hypothermic Perfusion 28C - 32C
1/100 (1%) 1/200 (0.005%) 99/100 200/200 Both CVA patients recovered at 6-weeks from neurologic defecits; No stroke at 28C; 1 Stroke at 32C; 1 Stroke at 37
6 weeks after surgery
Birdi 1999 Patients with stable angina pectoris undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery
Unstable angina, Recent myocardial infarction (within past 6-months), Diabetes mellitus, Serum creatinine >120umol/litre
CPB Hypothermic Perfusion at 28-32C; Topical cooling with saline 4C
0/22 (0%) 0/44 (0%) 22/22 44/44 Rewarming of the myocardium when using NT perfusion
Hospitalization (7-Days)
Boldt 1994 males, ages 50-70, scheduled for elective aortocoronary bypass grafting
not mentioned (but no patients had peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension or renal insufficiency)
cold start of cardiopulmonary bypass consistent of priming room temp to 20C then maintained
0/15 0/15 15/15 15/15 Measured MAP, SVR, LDF (laser doppler flow)
Post-Operative Course
Boldt 1996 30 patients scheduled for first-time elective aortocoronary bypass grafting with expected bypass times of more than 100 minutes
preoperative coagulation disorders, concomitant valvular diseases, medication with heparin, aspirin, COX inhibitors or NSAIDs within last 7 days before operation
via surface cooling and cardiopulmonary bypass system with rectal temperature kept between 27-28C
0/15 0/15 15/15 15/15 measured platelet aggregation by measuring thrombomodulin plasma levels
Post-Operative Course
Boodhwani 2007 Patients aged ≥ 60 elective CABG
known neurologic deficits (previous stroke, history of Parkinson, Canadian Neurological Scale score <11.5, abnormal Modified Mini-Mental State scores), serum creatinine greater than twice normal level
water-circulating thermal control pads maintainted at 34C measured in nasopharynx, no active rewarming used
0/133 1/134 92% 96% deficit defined as 1 standard deviation decrease in individual scores from baseline in 1 or more out of 4 cognitive domains
3 months
Chello 1997 Patients scheduled to undergo non-urgent aorto-coronary bypass grafting
Beta-blocker use preoperatively, ejection fraction <55%, evidence of pulmonary disease on imaging
Cold blood cardioplegia
0/20 0/20 Not mentioned not mentioned density of beta adrenergic receptors and coupling capacity to adenylate cyclase
few hours after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery
Cook 1994 patients undergoing elective, first-time coronary artery bypass grafting
females of childbearing age, patients with clinical or lab evidence of cerebrovascular disease, increased intracranial pressure, insulind-dependent diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled hypertension, contrast
hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass maintained at 27C
0% 1/26 (3%) 46% 88% oxygen saturation in cerebral venous blood (of 51% or more) was considered neuroprotective
few hours after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery
17
allergy, demonstrated or suspected bacteremia
Dworschak 2004 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
severe stenosis of the internal carotid artery (>75%), chronic renal failure (Cr>2)
hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass maintained at 32C
1/24 (4%) 1/24 (4%) 24/24 24/24 higher levels of S-100b was a marker of cerebral injury, measured area under the curve of the marker; no difference between 2 groups
24 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass
Engelman 1999 Patients undergoing elective or urgent coronary revascularization and required 3 or more coronary bypass grafts (equating to at least 60 minute bypass time)
76 years or older, previous history of neurologic dysfunction, poor left ventricular function (<30%), ongoing myocardial ishcemia needing intraaortic ballon, renal dysfunction (Cr>2mg/L), recent (<7 days) postinfarction angina, significant carotid stenosis by duplex of >70%
CPB Perfusion: 20C 1/98 (1%) 3/193 (1.5%) Decrease of 1.3-1.8 points on Mathew scale
decrease of 1.3-1.8 points on Mathew scale
deterioration in neurologic function was measured based on change in Mathew scores in each patient comparing them from before operation to 1 month follow up (at latest point)
1 month
Gaudino 2002 Patients undergoing primary isolated CABG
associated cardiac or non-cardiac surgical procedures, age >80, single vessel disease, emergecy or urgent revascularization, LVEF <30%, carotid artery disease, previous CVA, chronic dialysis, hepatic failure, repiratory or renal insufficiency, hemorrhagic conditions, active infection, chronic anti-inflammatory therapy
CPB Perfusion: 26C 2/55 (3.6%) 0/58 55/55 58/58 neurologic function not measured but events of stroke are included
Hospitalization
Grigore 2001 Patient undergoing CABG
history of cerebrovascular disease with residual deficits, uncontrolled hypertension, alcoholism, pyschiatric illness, renal disease (Cr >2), active liver disease, pregnant women, patients with less than a seventh-grade education
CPB Perfusion: 28-30C 0/136 3/134 136/136 134/134 Hypothermia is not neuroprotective
6 weeks after surgery
Grimm 2000 Low-Risk, Elective CABG, Stable Angina, Multivessel CAD
Not Discussed CPB Perfusion: 32C 2/72 3/72 371ms mean P300 evoked potential
378ms mean P300 evoked potential
Normothermic CPB does not adversely affect cognitive brain function as compared to mild hypothermia
4 months after surgery
Jacquet 1999 Scheduled isolated CABG
Emergent surgery CABG+Valve Carotid stenosis > 80%
intermittent antegrade and retrograde cold crystalloid cardioplegia
3/108 (2.7%) 3/92 (3%) 106/108 90/92 not mentioned; used 1-number of patients with stroke
Hospitalization
Kaukoranta 1995 Scheduled isolated CABG
Coronary Reoperation CPB Perfusion: 28-29C 1/51 (1.9%) 0/50 (0%) 50/51 49/50 neurologic complications included TIA and cerebral infarction; used 1-number of patients with neuro complications
Hospitalization
Lajos 1993 Isolated CABG Hemodynamically stable Elective or urgent + unstable angina
not mentioned cold retrograde blood cardioplegia (started antegrade and continued retrograde through coronary
2/54 (3.7%) 0/109 (0%) 51/54 108/109 Warm blood cardioplegia offered no added myocardial protection over cold
Hospitalization
18
sinus). Cardiac temp kept at 10-15C.
Lehot 1992 CABG +/- AVR Respiratory failure Endocrinopathy Cerebral disease Amiodarone or Clonidine Emergency surgery
CPB Perfusion: 29C 0/10 1/10 10/10 10/10 Normothermic: Lower SVR during and after CPB + higher [catecholamine]
Post-Operative Course
Lomivorotov 2014
patients with valvular heart disease with or without coronary artery disease surgically treated under cardiopulmonary bypass between July 2011 and October 2012
urgent surgery, left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, decompensated congestive heart failure, glomerular filtration rate <60ml/min, severe hepatic and pulmonary disease, bleeding diathesis, history of coagulopathy, planned deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, acute myocardial infarction within 3 months prior to surgery
CPB Perfusion: 31C 1/70 1/70 68/70 69/70 Normothermic CPB in patients with VHD is as effective as using hypothermic perfusion in terms of myocardial protection
Hospitalization
Maccherini 1995 Elective CABG Time Period: 1/1/1993 - 9/30/1993
radiological evidence of pleural alterations antecedent to surgical procedures
CPB Perfusion: 28C 1/50 2/50 49/50 47/50 not mentioned, used 1-number of patients with diaphragmatic paralysis
6 Months
Martin 1994 Elective CABG Time Period: 3/1991 - 7/1992
not mentioned cold group received intermittent cold <_8C oxygentated crystalloid cardioplegia with systemic hypothermia (<=28C)
5/493 8/508 471/493 501/508 No difference in normothermic and moderate hypothermia in elective CABG, however significantly more CVA in normothermic group
Hospitalization
Mclean 1994 Urgent or elective isolated CABG
need for concomitant valvular surgery, aneurysmectomy, atrial or ventricular septal defect repair, or other complicating procedure; lack of consent for randomization; factors precluding proper preoperative assessments (ex emergency surgery, unstable cardiac disease, lack of fluency in English; inability to arrange follow up assessment; history of stroke
cold cardiopulmonary bypass temperature was <=28C
1/78 0/77 76/78 73/77 neuro event was a stroke (on Toronto Stroke Scale >=6 stroke score change before and after surgery) and decrease in the neuropyschological test battery (Buschke, Wechsler adult intelligence scale, pegboard test)
3 months
Mora 1996 Scheduled CABG patients scheduled for concomitant procedures (vascular surgery, valvular procedures, aneurysmectomy, repair of atrial or septal defects, placement of internal defibrillators), admitted to operating room directly from cardiac catheterization laboratory
patients cooled to a termperature <28C during cardiopulmonary bypass
1/68 0/70 61/68 70/70 neuro event was measured using 5neuropsychologic tests; used 1-number of patients with neurologic deficit
1 month after surgery
19
Nathan 2001 Age ≥ 60 Scheduled CABG English speaking
neurological deficits, impediment to completing neuropsychological testing
CPB Perfusion: 32C 1/112 3/111 38/100 49/94 neurocognitive deficit is a decrease fo >=0.5 standard deviation in 1 or more domains (domains: memory, attention, psychomotor); used 1-number of patients with neurologic deficit
3 months after surgery
Nathan 2004 Age ≥ 60 Scheduled CABG Consenting patient
neurological deficits, serum creatinine more than twice nromal, those with history of cardiac surgery
nasopharyngeal temperature was maintained at 34C throughout intraoperative period. All patients received tranexamic acid.
0/73 2/71 Unclear Unclear Hospitalization
Parodi 2000 CBP for Cardiac surgery not mentioned CPB Perfusion: 26-30C 2/66 1/66 64/66 (96.9%) 64/66 (96.9%) No significant difference found in mortality and neurologic defecit
Hospitalization
Plourde 1997 Age: 40 - 70 Language: English or French Elective CABG
prior cardiac surgery, history of cerebrovascular disease, severe systemic disease (ex. pulmonary or hepatic disease or bleeding disorders), left ventricular ejection fraction of <0.4
CPB Perfusion: 28C 0/30 0/24 10/30 8/24 neurocognitive deficit is one or more standard deviations deterioration on at least one out of 12 tests; used 1-number of patients with neurocognitive decline
7 days after surgery
Ranucci 1997 patients at risk for postoperative lung dysfunction and undergoing elective coronary revascularization
presence of associated procedures, emergency procedures, existance of preoperative neurologic damage
CPB Perfusion: 28C 0/25 2/25 Unclear Unclear Hospitalization
Rashid 1994 Elective isolated CABG not mentioned CPB Perfusion: 28C 1/137 (0.7%) 3/144 (2.1%) 2/137 (1.4%) 4/144 (2.8%) 1-patients hx of stroke 30 days after surgery
Rashid 1995 Elective isolated CABG Mod-Severe LV Dysfunction
not mentioned CPB Perfusion: 28C 2/58 (3.4%) 0/50 (0%) 2/58 (3.5%) 2/50 (4%) 1-patients hx of stroke 31 days after surgery
Regragui 1996 Elective, primary isolated CABG or Urgent CABG
Previous CVA Psychiatric Illness
CPB Perfusion: 28C 0/29 1/67 9/29 8/67 neurocognitive decline was measured as 1 or more deteriorations in neuropsychologic tests; used 1-number of patients with decline in greater than 1 test
6 weeks after surgery
Tonz 1995 Primary elective CABG Scheduled first case of day
patients with ejection fraction <0.35, ager greater than 65, previous cardiac procedures, impaired lung/liver/renal function
CPB Perfusion: 26-28C 0/14 0/16 14/14 16/16 "cerebrovascular insult" was 0 in both groups
Hospitalization
The Warm Heart Investigators 1994
Elective, primary isolated CABG or Urgent CABG
patients enrolled in other studies, scheduled for concomitant cardiac surgical or vascular procedures, cerebrovascular disease (internal carotid artery stenosis >80%), renal insufficiency (Cr>200mmol/L)
CPB Perfusion: 25-30C 12/860 (1.4%) 22/872 (2.5%) 846/860 859/872 1-patients hx of stroke 30 days after surgery
Zey bek 2001 Elective MVR not mentioned CPB Perfusion: 28C 0/15 0/25 15/15 25/25 no "neurological events" 1 hour postoperative
e-Table6.SummaryofstudiesthatevaluatedeffectoftherapeutichypothermiaonpatientswhounderwentCABG.
20
Study Patient Population Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria Intervention
Mortality Neuroprotection Outcome: Comments
Follow up
Normothermia Hypothermia Normothermia Hypothermia
Bernal 2016
Patients with acute liver failure, high-grade encephalopathy and intracranial pressure monitoring in specialist intensive care units in the United Kingdom and Denmark
Patients with acute liver failure (INR >=1.5, absence of previous history and clinical/radiologic findings of liver disease, illenss<=26 weeks, overt encephalopathy of grade >=3, patients 18 years or older, intubated, sedated, mechanically ventilated (considered high risk of intracranial hypertension
Pregnancy, evidence of brain stem death, ongoing or suspected hemorrhage, suspected or microbiologically confirmed severe sepsis, no consent
Targeted temprature management of 34C for 72 hours via surface temperatue managemetn devices and when needed, control of blood temperature through continuous RRT extracorporeal circuits
12/26 (46%) 7/17 (41%) 19/26 (73%) 11/17 (65%)
Negative neurologic effect was measured as sustained elevation in intracranial pressure >25mmHg with onset < 72 hours
72 hours after patients were randomized
Chouhan 2006 Patient who underwent Intracranial Aneurysm Surgery
Any patient posted for intracra- nial aneurysm clipping, were included in the study
Patients with severe sys- temic illnesses, sepsis, peripheral vascular diseases and bleeding disorders
HT group: polar Air machine was used along with cold intravenous fluids at room temperature . Goal is core temperature between 34 – 33 in HT and 36.0 - 37.5 NT
1/23 (0.04%) 2/24 (0.08%) 19/23 (82.6%) 20/24 (83.3%)
The overall neurological recovery is considered with patient has returned to independent life style (Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) V and IV).
hospital discharge
Dixon 2002 Patients with acute anterior or posterior myocardial infarction (<6 hours from symptom onset)
Any patient presented within 6 hours from symptom onset, chest pain >30 minutes duration with ST-segment elevatation >=1mmin 2 contiguous leads, if inferior acute MI patients were required to have>=1mm reciprocal ST segment depression in 2 precordial leads
Patients with cardiogenic shock, rescue angioplasty, previous acute MI <1 month, Raynaud's disease, hypersensitivity to buspirone or mepiridine, treatment with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor in the previous 14 days, bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy, severe hepatic or renal impairment, pregnancy, patient height <1.5m, presence of an inferior vena cava filter
Endovascular cooling (target core temperature 33C), maintained for 3 hours after reperfusion
2/21 (10%) 0/21 (0%) N/A N/A
Not measured, used number of patients with stroke
hospital discharge
Gotberg 2010 Patients scheduled to undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Patients between ages 18 and 75, presenting with an anterior or inferior STEMI with St-segment elevation of >0.2mV in 2 or more anatomically contiguous leads and duration of symptoms of <6 hours
patients with cardiac arrest, previous acute MI, previous PCI or CABG, known congestive heart failure, end-stage kidney disease or hepatic failure, recent stroke, coagulopathy, pregnancy, Killip class II through IV at presentation
infusion of cold saline and endovascular cooling catheter before reperfusion in acute MI, core body temperature aim of <35C
0/9 (0%) 0/9 (0%) N/A N/A
Not measured, used number of patients with stroke
30 days
Hindman 1999
Patients undergoing cerebral aneurysmal clipping with subarachnoid hemorrhage at 5 academic centers
Patients with intracranial aneurysms were required to have a prehospitalization/pre-SAH Rankin disability score of 0 or 1. Patients with acute SAH were required to have a preoperative World
Patients who were endotracheally intubated when evaluated for the study, cryoglobulinemia, severe Raynaud's disease, sickle cell disease, another
Intraoperative hypothermia with cooling mattress set to 20C, forced air cooling blanket set to deliver unwarmed room
3/28 (11%) 2/24(8%) 16/28 (57%) 17/24 (71%) Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) as good
3-6 months
21
Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) score of I, II, or III
disorder considered to contraindicate hypothermia, entered in a blinded trial of any drug that could affect neurological outcome
air temperature, IVFs and anesthetic gases not warmed, target esophageal temperature 33.5C
Patients undergoing cerebral aneurysmal clipping without subarachnoid hemorrhage at 5 academic centers
Patients with intracranial aneurysms needed prehospitalization/pre-SAH Rankin disability score of 0 or 1
Patients who were endotracheally intubated when evaluated for the study, cryoglobulinemia, severe Raynaud's disease, sickle cell disease, another disorder considered to contraindicate hypothermia, entered in a blinded trial of any drug that could affect neurological outcome
Intraoperative hypothermia with cooling mattress set to 20C, forced air cooling blanket set to deliver unwarmed room air temperature, IVFs and anesthetic gases not warmed, target esophageal temperature 33.5C
0/29 (0%)
2/30(7%) (patients discharged before examination)
22/29 (76%)
23/30 (77%) patients discharged before examination)
Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) as good
3-6 months
Itenov 2018 Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock were a mean arterial pressure of less than 70 mm Hg
Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock were considered for enrolment if they had a mean arterial pressure of less than 70 mm Hg, were on mechanical ventilation in an ICU, were aged at least 50 years, were expected to stay in the ICU for more than 24 h, and could be recruited within 6 h
Patients with uncontrolled bleeding, clinically important bleeding disorder (acute or chronic), recent open surgery, pregnancy or breast-feeding, or involuntary psychiatric admission.
Used to methods for hypothermia, external cooling or endovascular cooling with target temperature of 32–34°C within 2 h.
77/215 (35.8%) 96/217 (44.2%) N/A N/A
Not measured, used different measures other than CPC and GOS
30 days
Legriel 2016 Critically ill patients with convulsive status epilepticus who were receiving mechanical ventilation
Patients older than 18 years old admitted with any seizure activity to the ICU, convulsive status epilepticus (5 minutes or more of continuous clinical seizure activity or more than 2 seizures without return to baseline in the interval), admitted less than 8 hours after onest of seizures, receiving mechanical ventilation
Patients who had full recovery from seizure (return to baseline state of consciousness), needed emergency surgery that would preclude therapeutic hypothermia, postanoxic status epilepticus, imminent death, do-not-resuscitate orders, bacterial meningitis
Target temo was (32 to 24C) for 24 hours .Hypothermia was induced with ice-cold intrave- nous fluids at 4°C and was maintained with ice packs at the groin and neck and a cold-air tunnel around the patient’s body
20/130 (15%) 18/138 (13%) 56/130 (43%) 67/138 (49%)
Good functional outcome defined as Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 5
90 days after discharge
Mourvillier 2013
Comatose patients (with GCS score <=8 for >12 hours) with community-aquired bacterial meningitis in 49 ICUs in France
Patients who were at least 18 years of age, had suspected or proven bacterial meningitis (by CSF white blood cell count of more than 100/uL and glucose CXF/blood ration of less than 1/3, a CSF protein concentration of >2.2g/L, or microorganisms observed in CSF gram stain, positive soluble antigen test or PCR for Streptococcus penumonia or Neisseria meningitidis, positive CSF cultures, GCS score of 8 or lower for <12 hours
Patient who were pregnant, with positive cryptococcal test, brain abscess, purpura fulminans, complications requiring therapeutic hypothermia (ex cardiac arrest) or if the physician made a decision to limit life support, also, patient had no medical insurance, inclusion in another interventoinal study
Hypothermia was induced by loading dose of 4C cold saline, cooled to 32-24C for 48 hours with passive rewarming
15/49 (31%) 25/49 (51%) 13/49 (27%) 7/49 (14%)
Favorable outcome was Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 5
3 months
Nichol 2015
Patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention at 7 centers
Patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction within 6 hours of symptoms onset, age 18 to 85, clinical symptoms consistent with acute STEMI
Patients who had cardiac arrest, contraindications to periotoneal lavage (prior intraperitoneal surgery, profound obesity, abdominal
Hypothermia induced by an automated peritoneal lavage system before and 3 hours after PCI
0/26 (0%) 1/28 (3.6%) N/A N/A Not measured 30 days
22
lasting >=minutes and starting within 6 hours of hospital presentaion, >=2mm of ST segment elevation in >= 2 contiguous ECG leads, planned coronary angiography with intenteded primary PCI
aortic aneurysm, massive ascites), temperature-sensitive hematologic dyscrasias or vasospastic disorders, oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary edema or cardiogenic shock, history of previous MI or pathological Q waves on prior ECG, active uncontrolled bleeding, known Hb<9, platelet count <100,000 or >750,000, serum Cr >2, dialysis or maredly abnormal liver function, contraindications for MRI, known allergy/intolerance to meperidine or buspirone or treatmetn with MAOI within 14 days, known hypersensitivity to contrast or antiplatelet meds, prior thrombolytic agent use for index STEMI, chronic oral anticoagulant use, pregnant or nursing, comorbidities with life expectancy <1 year, any conditions leading to noncomplicance with study procedures, currently enrolled in another investigational trial, unable to provide informed consent
Pang 2016 Patients who had cardiac arrest patients with extracorporeal life support who had received CPR
Patients with ventricular fibrillation, asystole or PEA, pulseless ventricular tachycardia, downtime <45 minutes (form onset of cardiac arrest to initiation of ACLS), comatose, not responding appropriately to verbal commands after ROSC, total ACLS time <60 mins, age >=21, intubated with mechanical ventilation
Patients responding appropriately to verbal commands after ROSC, CPR>45mins, severe coagulopathy with evidenc eof bleeding and/or platelets <30,000 and/or INR >=2.5, otehr causes of coma (drug overdose, head trauma, stroke, overt status epilepticus), positive pregnancy test in women <50 yo, premorbid status bedboudn and uncommunicative, temp <30C after cardiac arrest
Hypothermia induced at 34C following ECLS for cardiac arrest by modulating the heat exchanger component of the ECLS circuit.
9/12 (75%) 6/9 (66.7%) 1/12 (8.3%) 2/9 (22.2%)
Considered as good neurological function if cerebral performance category scores 1-2
6 months
Stone 2011
Patients at risk of radiocontrast induced nephropathy (baseline CrCl 20-50ml/min) undergoing cardiac catheterization with iodinated contrast >=50ml
Patients who were at least 18 yo with CKD (CrCl 20-50 ml/min) scheduled to undergo coronary arteriography (with or without PCI) with likely use of iodinated contrast >=50ml
Patients who had acute renal failure or unstable renal function, current or planned dialysis, performance of renal artery angiography, renal drug infusion, known renal artery stenosis, use
Endovascular Temperature Therapy System was used to induce hypothermia with target temperature of 33-34C for 3 hours
1/70 (1.4%) 3/58 (5.2%) N/A N/A Not measured 30 days
23
of mannitol or intravenous diuretics, presence of decompensated heart failure, respiratory failure, hypotension, acute or recent STEMI, allergy to contrast, heparin, mepiridine or buspirone that could not be premedicated, recent MAOI use, addtional contrast administration 10 days before or after the procedure, presence of an inferior vena cava filter, height <1.5m, hypersensitivity to hypothermia (Raynaud), bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, sickle cell disease, severe hepatic impairment, cryoglobulinemia, untreated hypothyroidism, Addison disease, prostatic hypertrophy or uretheral stricture, refusal of blood transfusions, pregnancy, inability to sign infromed consent, enrollment in another investigational drug or device trial, any condition leading to noncompliance with study procedures
Todd 2005
patients with World Federation of Neurological Surgeons score of I, II, or III who had had a subarachnoid hemorrhage no more than 14 days prior to planned surgical aneurysmal clipping
patients at least 18 years old, had a subarachnoid hemorrhage from a radiologically demonstrated intracranial aneurysm within 14 days before surgery, had a WFNS score of I, II, or III ("good grade") at time of enrollement, Rankin score of 0 or 1 before hemorrhage
Patients who were pregnant. Patient withBMI >35, cold-related disorder, had an endotracheal tube in place
Intraoperative hypothermia (target temperature 33C) with use of surface cooling techniques (foreced-air blanket connected to cooling unit, use of circulating water mattress, intravenous cold saline)
32/501 (6%) 29/499 (6%) 314/501 (63%) 329/499 (66%)
Good outcome was considered Glasgow Outcome Score of 1
90 days after
surgery
e-Table7.Summaryofstudiesthatevaluatedeffectoftherapeutichypothermiaonpatientswithotherformsofcriticalcareillnesses.
24
Study Population type
Total # of Pt
NT Age
HT Age
NT Sex (%M)
HT Sex (%M)
NT deaths
NT # of Pt
HT deaths
HT # of Pt
NT Temp in C
HT Temp in C
Aibiki 2000 TBI 26 38 34 72.7 80 3 11 1 15 36-37 32-33 Andrews 2015
TBI 387 36.7 37.4 N/A N/A 51 192 68 195 37 34
Clifton 1993 TBI 46 30.2 27.5 N/A N/A 8 22 8 24 37 32-33 Clifton 2001 TBI 368 32 31 N/A N/A 48 178 53 190 37.2 33.2 Clifton 2011 TBI 97 31 26 N/A N/A 8 45 12 52 37 33 Cooper 2018 TBI 495 34.1 35 80.8 79.6 44 239 54 256 35 33 Gal 2002 TBI 30 39 35 66.7 60 5 15 2 15 37 34 Harris 2009 TBI 25 33.2 38.1 84.6 91.7 4 13 6 12 37.9 36.9 Hashiguchi 2003
TBI 17 39.1 29 62.5 100 0 8 1 9 36.5-37.5
34
Jiang 2000 TBI 87 40.6 42.2 84 81.4 20 44 11 43 37-38 34 Lee 2010 TBI 31 43.5 44 62.5 60 2 16 1 15 37 34 Lui 2006 TBI 44 42.3 39.6 69.5 57 12 23 6 21 36.5-
37.5 36
Maekawa 2015
TBI 142 39 39 68 70 11 48 33 94 35-36 33-34
Marion 1993 TBI 40 32.1 31.9 85 85 2 20 0 20 37-38 32-33 Marion 1997 TBI 81 35 31 79 90 10 42 9 39 37-
38.5 32-33
Qui 2007 TBI 80 40.2 41.3 67.5 62.5 13 40 9 40 37.5-38
34.5-36
Shiozaki 1993
TBI 33 35.4 35.3 58.8 37.5 14 17 8 16 37 34
Shiozaki 1999
TBI 16 40.3 31.4 62.5 100 0 8 0 8 37 34
Shiozaki 2001
TBI 91 42 35 67 77.7 6 46 8 45 37 34
Tang 2017 TBI 60 39.67 42.47 93.3 76.7 10 30 3 30 36 33.5 Zhao 2011 TBI 81 37.5 36.9 73.2 72.5 4 41 1 40 37 32.7 Zhi 2003 TBI 396 42 43 N/A N/A 72 198 51 198 36.5 -
37.5 32-33
De Georgia 2004
Stroke 40 67.3 60.9 27.2 72.2 4 22 5 18 36.5 33
Els 2005 Stroke 25 49 49 69.2 50 2 13 1 12 37.5 35 Hemmen 2010
Stroke 58 62.3 68.9 53.8 56.7 5 30 6 28 37 33-34
Lyden 2016 Stroke 120 67.5 65.5 61 54 5 57 10 63 36.4 34.1-36
Piironen 2014
Stroke 36 66 70 44 67 2 18 0 18 >36 34.5-35.5
Su 2015 Stroke 33 68.5 59.8 58.8 93.7 7 17 8 16 36.5–37.5
33-34
Bernard 2002
Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest
77 65 66.8 79 58 23 34 22 43 37.1 32.7
Bernard 2016
Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest
1198 64.3 65.3 74.8 73.8 514 580 555 618 35.4 34.7
Cronberg 2015
Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest
939 59 61 82.5 85.7 220 466 228 473 36 33
Hachimi-Idrissi 2001
Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest
30 74 76.5 64.3 56.3 13 14 13 16 35.7 34
25
Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group 2002
Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest
275 59 59 76.8 75.9 76 138 56 137 37-38 32-34
Kamarainen 2009
Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest
37 63 59 94.7 94.4 10 18 11 19 35.2 34.1
Kim 2014 Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest
1359 65.2 65.7 62.9 64.4 422 671 429 688 35.8 34.9
Laurent 2005
Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest
61 55 56 79.5 81.8 11 39 3 22 37.4 31.7
Nielsen 2013 Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest
939 64 64 79 83 225 466 235 473 36 33
Arom 1995 Intra-op CABG
200 59.3 60.8 78 70 4 100 3 100 37 34
Bert 1993 Intra-op CABG
30 63.2 62.5 94 93 0 16 0 14 36-38 25
Birdi 1997 Intra-op CABG
300 60.4 60 92 86.5 1 100 2 200 37 28-32
Birdi 1999 Intra-op CABG
66 61 64 86.3 79.5 0 22 0 44 37 28-32
Boldt 1994 Intra-op CABG
30 63.9 64.1 100 100 0 15 0 15 35.8 20
Boldt 1996 Intra-op CABG
30 65 64.1 100 100 0 15 0 15 >35 <28
Boodhwani 2007
Intra-op CABG
267 69.3 68.2 87 88.8 1 134 3 133 37 34
Chello 1997 Intra-op CABG
40 52.7 54.3 75 80 0 20 0 20 37 25-28
Cook 1994 Intra-op CABG
52 66.6 69.2 N/A N/A 0 26 1 26 37 27
Dworschak 2004
Intra-op CABG
48 65 62 N/A N/A 1 24 1 24 37 32
Engelman 1999
Intra-op CABG
291 62.3 63 80.6 85.5 1 98 3 193 37 25-32
Gaudino 2002
Intra-op CABG
113 <80 <80 94.5 91.3 2 55 0 58 37 26
Grigore 2001 Intra-op CABG
270 60 61 79 74 0 136 3 134 36 28-30
Grimm 2000 Intra-op CABG
144 62.4 61 86 90 2 72 3 72 37 32
Jacquet 1999
Intra-op CABG
200 64.5 65.2 75.9 68.4 3 108 3 92 37 30
Kaukoranta 1995
Intra-op CABG
101 58.6 58.6 82 80 1 51 0 50 37 28-29
Lajos 1993 Intra-op CABG
163 64.76 63.31 70 71.5 2 54 1 109 36-37 30
Lehot 1992 Intra-op CABG
20 60 62 80 100 0 10 1 10 37 29
Lomivorotov 2014
Intra-op CABG
140 56.9 57.4 58.6 55.7 1 70 1 70 37 31
Maccherini 1995
Intra-op CABG
100 65 64 76 84 1 50 2 50 37 28
Martin 1994 Intra-op CABG
1001 63.6 62.9 74 77 5 493 8 508 >/=35 </=28
Mclean 1994 Intra-op CABG
155 58.1 59.3 N/A N/A 1 78 0 77 >34 </=28
26
Mora 1996 Intra-op CABG
138 65 61 75 81 1 68 0 70 >/=35 <28
Nathan 2001 Intra-op CABG
223 68 68 85 85 1 112 3 111 37 34
Nathan 2004 Intra-op CABG
144 70 68 84 90 0 73 2 71 37 34
Parodi 2000 Intra-op CABG
132 64.7 64.3 72.7 71.2 2 66 1 66 37 26-30
Plourde 1997
Intra-op CABG
54 58.3 55.9 90 95.8 0 30 0 24 36 29
Ranucci 1997
Intra-op CABG
50 64.5 67 80 84 0 25 2 25 37 28
Rashid 1994 Intra-op CABG
281 60.2 60.2 78.8 87.5 1 137 3 144 37 28
Rashid 1995 Intra-op CABG
108 59 59 86.2 82 2 58 0 50 37 28
Regragui 1996
Intra-op CABG
96 58.7 59 93 85 0 29 1 67 37 30
The Warm Heart Investigators 1994
Intra-op CABG
1732 60 60 83 84 12 860 22 872 37 25-30
Tonz 1995 Intra-op CABG
30 60 63 100 87.5 0 14 0 16 37 26-28
Zeybek 2001 Intra-op CABG
40 37.45 43.64 20 28 0 15 0 25 36 28
Bernal 2016 Others 43 38 39 38 47 12 26 7 17 35.9 33.2 Chouhan 2006
Others 47 49.09 46.32 52 54 1 23 2 24 36.5 33.8
Dixon 2002 Others 42 58 52 76 90 2 21 0 21 35.7 33.2 Gotberg 2010
Others 18 58 62 78 78 0 9 0 9 36.5 34.7
Hindman 1999 (SAH)
Others 52 56 48 46 39 3 28 2 24 36.7 33.7
Hindman 1999 (Without SAH
Others 59 52 54 14 33 0 29 2 30 36.4 33.7
Itenov 2018 Others 432 71 70 60 60 77 215 96 217 36-38 32-34 Legriel 2016 Others 268 57 57 60 69 20 130 18 138 37 32-34 Mourvillier 2013
Others 98 59 59 63 57 15 49 25 49 37 33.3
Nichol 2015 Others 54 57.5 57 80.8 89.3 0 26 1 28 36.2 34.7 Pang 2016 Others 21 57.4 45.9 75 88.9 9 12 6 9 37 34 Stone 2011 Others 128 72 74 68.6 51.7 1 70 3 58 36.1 33.6 Todd 2005 Others 1000 51 52 34 35 32 501 29 499 36.7 33.3
e-Table8.Summaryofbaselinecharacteristicsofallstudiesincludedinthismeta-analysis. Patient population (Traumatic Brain Injury, Stroke,Out of hospital Cardiac arrest, Intra-Operative Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting or others), Total # of Pt (Total number of patients), NT Age (Mean/median age in normothermia group), HT Age (Mean/median age in Hypothermia group), NT Sex (%M) (% males in normothermia group), HT Sex (%M) (% males in hypothermia group), NT deaths (Number of patient deaths in normothermia group), NT # of Pt (Number of patients in normothermia group), HT deaths (Number of patient deaths in Hypothermia group), HT # of Pt (Number of patients in hypothermia group), NT Temp in C (Actual Temp that is reached in the normothermia group (Mean/Median) (in Celcius)), HT Temp in C ( Actual Temp that is reached in the Hypothermia group, (Mean/Median) (in Celcius)), N/A (Not available), TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury), Intra-op CABG (Intra-Operative Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting)
27
e-Table9.Riskofbiassummary.
28
(A)
(B)
29
(C)
(D)
30
(E)
SupplementaryFigure4(A-E)Funnelplotstoinvestigateevidenceofpublicationbiasforeachsubgroup:Traumaticbraininjury(A),Stroke(B),Outofhospitalcardiacarrest(C),intra-operativecardiacpulmonarybypass(D)andothers(E).Intheabsenceofpublicationbias,thepatternofpointsshouldresembleaninvertedfunnel
31
PRISMAChecklist:
Section/topic # Checklist item Reported on page #
TITLE Title 1 Identify the report as a systematic review, meta-analysis, or both. 1 ABSTRACT Structured summary 2 Provide a structured summary including, as applicable: background; objectives; data sources; study eligibility
criteria, participants, and interventions; study appraisal and synthesis methods; results; limitations; conclusions and implications of key findings; systematic review registration number.
2
INTRODUCTION Rationale 3 Describe the rationale for the review in the context of what is already known. 3 Objectives 4 Provide an explicit statement of questions being addressed with reference to participants, interventions,
comparisons, outcomes, and study design (PICOS). 3&4
METHODS Protocol and registration 5 Indicate if a review protocol exists, if and where it can be accessed (e.g., Web address), and, if available, provide
registration information including registration number. 4
Eligibility criteria 6 Specify study characteristics (e.g., PICOS, length of follow-up) and report characteristics (e.g., years considered, language, publication status) used as criteria for eligibility, giving rationale.
4
Information sources 7 Describe all information sources (e.g., databases with dates of coverage, contact with study authors to identify additional studies) in the search and date last searched.
4
Search 8 Present full electronic search strategy for at least one database, including any limits used, such that it could be repeated.
4
Study selection 9 State the process for selecting studies (i.e., screening, eligibility, included in systematic review, and, if applicable, included in the meta-analysis).
4
Data collection process 10 Describe method of data extraction from reports (e.g., piloted forms, independently, in duplicate) and any processes for obtaining and confirming data from investigators.
4
Data items 11 List and define all variables for which data were sought (e.g., PICOS, funding sources) and any assumptions and simplifications made.
4
Risk of bias in individual studies 12 Describe methods used for assessing risk of bias of individual studies (including specification of whether this was done at the study or outcome level), and how this information is to be used in any data synthesis.
4&5
Summary measures 13 State the principal summary measures (e.g., risk ratio, difference in means). 5
32
Synthesis of results 14 Describe the methods of handling data and combining results of studies, if done, including measures of consistency (e.g., I2) for each meta-analysis.
5
Page 1 of 2
Section/topic # Checklist item Reported on page #
Risk of bias across studies 15 Specify any assessment of risk of bias that may affect the cumulative evidence (e.g., publication bias, selective reporting within studies).
5
Additional analyses 16 Describe methods of additional analyses (e.g., sensitivity or subgroup analyses, meta-regression), if done, indicating which were pre-specified.
5
RESULTS Study selection 17 Give numbers of studies screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review, with reasons for exclusions
at each stage, ideally with a flow diagram. 6
Study characteristics 18 For each study, present characteristics for which data were extracted (e.g., study size, PICOS, follow-up period) and provide the citations.
6
Risk of bias within studies 19 Present data on risk of bias of each study and, if available, any outcome level assessment (see item 12). 6 Results of individual studies 20 For all outcomes considered (benefits or harms), present, for each study: (a) simple summary data for each
intervention group (b) effect estimates and confidence intervals, ideally with a forest plot. 6
Synthesis of results 21 Present results of each meta-analysis done, including confidence intervals and measures of consistency. 6-8 Risk of bias across studies 22 Present results of any assessment of risk of bias across studies (see Item 15). 6 Additional analysis 23 Give results of additional analyses, if done (e.g., sensitivity or subgroup analyses, meta-regression [see Item 16]). 6-8
DISCUSSION Summary of evidence 24 Summarize the main findings including the strength of evidence for each main outcome; consider their relevance
to key groups (e.g., healthcare providers, users, and policy makers). 8-9
Limitations 25 Discuss limitations at study and outcome level (e.g., risk of bias), and at review-level (e.g., incomplete retrieval of identified research, reporting bias).
12
Conclusions 26 Provide a general interpretation of the results in the context of other evidence, and implications for future research.
12
FUNDING Funding 27 Describe sources of funding for the systematic review and other support (e.g., supply of data); role of funders for
the systematic review. 1
From: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097
Page 2 of 2