Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State...

26
Appendix G Air Quality Analysis

Transcript of Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State...

Page 1: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

Appendix GAir Quality Analysis

Page 2: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

FINAL REPORT

Hooper Road (LA 408) Project from Blackwater Road to Sullivan Road

City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317

Air Quality Analysis

Prepared for:

Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development

June 2015

Page 3: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

 

Page 4: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

 

i 118957‐95996 

Table of Contents  

 

Section1  Introduction................................................................................................................................1‐1 

1.1ProjectDesciption......................................................................................................................................................1‐1 1.2TrafficVolumesintheStudyArea.......................................................................................................................1‐2 

Section2  RegulatoryFramework...........................................................................................................2‐1 

2.1CriteriaPollutants......................................................................................................................................................2‐1 CarbonMonoxide.......................................................................................................................................................2‐1 Lead..................................................................................................................................................................................2‐1 NitrogenDioxide........................................................................................................................................................2‐1 Ozone...............................................................................................................................................................................2‐2 ParticulateMatter......................................................................................................................................................2‐2 SulfurDioxide..............................................................................................................................................................2‐3 

2.2NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards..........................................................................................................2‐3 2.3AttainmentStatus.......................................................................................................................................................2‐3 2.4TransportationConformity....................................................................................................................................2‐5 2.5AirToxics........................................................................................................................................................................2‐6 

Section3  ImpactAnalysis..........................................................................................................................3‐1 

3.1VehicleEmissions.......................................................................................................................................................3‐1 3.1.1CriteriaPollutants..........................................................................................................................................3‐1 

CarbonMonoxide...........................................................................................................................................3‐1 Ozone,VolatileOrganicCompounds,andNitrogenDioxide.......................................................3‐1 ParticulateMatterandSulfurDioxide...................................................................................................3‐2 Lead......................................................................................................................................................................3‐2 HooperRoadEmissions...............................................................................................................................3‐2 

3.1.2MobileSourceAirToxics.............................................................................................................................3‐2 3.2ConstructionEmissions...........................................................................................................................................3‐4 

Section4  Conclusions..................................................................................................................................4‐1 

Section5  References...................................................................................................................................5‐1 

List of Tables 

Table1‐1AnnualAverageDailyTrafficintheStudyArea..............................................................................................1‐2 Table2‐1NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards............................................................................................................2‐4 Table2‐2Ambient(Background)AirQualityData.............................................................................................................2‐5 Table3‐1EstimatedDailyVehicleMilesTraveled..............................................................................................................3‐3 

 

 

Page 5: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

 

 

ii 118957‐95996 

Acronyms and Abbreviations 

µg/m3 microgramspercubicmeter

AADT annualaveragedailytraffic

CAA CleanAirAct

CFR CodeofFederalRegulations

CO carbonmonoxide

CRPC CapitalRegionPlanningCommission

DOTD LouisianaDepartmentofTransportationandDevelopment

EIS environmentalimpactstatement

EPA UnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency

FHWA FederalHighwayAdministration

FR FederalRegister

FTA FederalTransitAdministration

LDEQ LouisianaDepartmentofEnvironmentalQuality

LOS LevelofService

mg/m3 milligramspercubicmeter

MPO MetropolitanPlanningOrganization

MSAT mobilesourceairtoxics

N/A notapplicable

NAAQS NationalAmbientAirQualityStandard

NEPA NationalEnvironmentalPolicyAct

NO2 nitrogendioxide

NOx nitrogenoxides

O3 ozone

Pb lead

PM particulatematter

PM10 inhalableparticulatematter

Page 6: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

 

 

iii 118957‐95996 

PM2.5 fineparticulatematter

ppb partsperbillion

ppm partspermillion

SIP StateImplementationPlan

SO2 sulfurdioxide

TIP TransportationImprovementPlan

USC UnitedStatesCode

VMT vehiclemilestraveled

VOC volatileorganiccompound

Page 7: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management
Page 8: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

 

1‐1 118957‐95996 

Section 1    

Introduction 

TheproposedHooperRoad(LA408)ProjectbetweenBlackwaterRoadandSullivanRoadisdescribedbelow.Subsequentsectionsdiscusstheapplicableregulationsandairqualityimpactanalysisfortheproposedproject.

1.1 Project Desciption TheHooperRoad(LA408)ProjectbetweenBlackwaterRoadandSullivanRoadislocatedinCentral,LouisianainEastBatonRougeParish.Thesegmentfrom2,800feettotheeastofBlackwaterRoadtojustwestofSullivanRoadiscurrentlyatwo‐laneroadway,whileHooperRoadtotheeastandwestofthissegmentisafour‐lanedividedroadway.Thegoaloftheprojectistoprovideanadditionalthrough‐trafficlaneineachdirectionandaraisedmediantoincreasecapacityandtoimprovesafety.HooperRoadisastatehighwayandissubjecttoLouisianaDepartmentofTransportationandDevelopment(DOTD)designrequirements.TheprojectisincludedintheEastBatonRougeParishGreenLightPlan.

Theproposedprojecthasfivealternatives:

AlternativeA–NorthWidening.ThisalternativewillwidenHooperRoadtothenorth.

AlternativeB–SouthWidening.ThisalternativewillwidentheHooperRoadtothesouth.

AlternativeC–CenteredRebuild.Thisalternativewillusetheexistingcenterlineandwillwidentothenorthandsouth.

AlternativeD–Hybrid(combinationofAlternativesAandC)withsidepaths.

AlternativeE–Hybrid(combinationofAlternativesAandC)withoutsidepaths.

Allalternativeswillupgradeand/orreplacetheexistingroadway,wherenecessary.30‐footand16‐footraisedmedianoptionsarebeingconsideredforAlternativesAthroughC.A16‐footmedianisincludedinAlternativesDandE.Acurbandgutterroadwaywithsidewalks,sewers,andsubsurfacedrainageimprovementsareproposed.

ThePreferredAlternative,AlternativeE,isacombinationofelementsfoundinAlternativesAandC.BetweenBlackwaterRoadandJoorRoad,theproposedprojectwouldwidensymmetricallytothenorthandsouthfromtheexistingcenterline,similartoAlternativeC.BetweenJoorRoadandShoeCreekDrive,theproposedprojectwouldhaveanorthernoffset,similartoAlternativeA.EastofShoeCreekDrivewouldalsowidensymmetricallyfromtheexistingcenterline,likeAlternativeC.A16‐feetwideraisedmedianoptionisincludedinthisPreferredAlternative.PotentialnoiseimpactsfromthePreferredAlternativearediscussedbasedontheanalysisconductedforthe30‐footmedianoptionforAlternativesA,B,andC.AlternativeDwouldhavethesameroadwayalignmentasAlternativeE.

Page 9: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

Section 1     Introduction  

1‐2 118957‐95996 

1.2 Traffic Volumes in the Study Area Theexisting(2013)anddesignyear(2037)annualaveragedailytraffic(AADT)volumesinthestudyareaareshowninTable1‐1.ThehighesttrafficvolumeonHooperRoadinthestudyareaoccursneartheSullivanRoadintersection,accordingtofieldobservations;Table1‐1showsthetrafficvolumesonHooperRoadtothewestofSullivanRoad.Trafficvolumeisexpectedtogrowover160percentfromexistinglevelsto2037.ThissectionofHooperRoadhasaLevelofService(LOS)ofE,whichischaracterizedbyunstableoperationandsignificantdelay.Althoughatprojectcompletion(2017)theLOSisexpectedtoimprovetoC/D,by2037theLOSisexpectedtobeEbecauseofregionalvehiclevolumeincrease.

Table 1‐1 Annual Average Daily Traffic in the Study Area 

Roadway Segment Existing (2013) AADT 

Design Year (2037) 

AADT % Change 

from No Build 

Hooper Road (West of Sullivan Road)  15,483 24,903 161%

Source: CDM Smith, 2014. . 

 

 

Page 10: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

 

    2‐1 118957‐95996 

Section 2    

Regulatory Framework 

Airqualitymanagementandprotectionresponsibilitiesexistinfederal,state,andlocallevelsofgovernment.ThefederalCleanAirAct(CAA)istheprimarystatuethatestablishesambientairqualitystandardsandestablishesregulatoryauthoritiestoenforceregulationsdesignedtoattainthosestandards.TheUnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)isresponsibleforimplementationoftheCAA.TheCAAwasenactedin1955andwasamendedin1963,1965,1967,1970,1977,1990,and1997.LouisianaDepartmentofEnvironmentalQuality(LDEQ)operatestheairqualitymonitoringprogram,implementsthepermitprogram,andworkswithMetropolitanPlanningOrganizations(MPOs)andtheDOTDfortransportationplanning.

2.1 Criteria Pollutants EPAregulatessevencommonpollutantscalledcriteriapollutants.Theyincludecarbonmonoxide(CO),lead(Pb),nitrogendioxide(NO2),ozone(O3),inhalableparticulatematter(PM10),fineparticulatematter(PM2.5),andsulfurdioxide(SO2).Eachpollutantisdescribedbelow.

Carbon Monoxide COisacolorless,odorlessgasthatishighlytoxic.Itisformedbytheincompletecombustionoffuels.InEastBatonRougeParish,over75percentofCOemissionsoccurfrommobilesources(EPA2014a).ExposuretoCOcanreducethebody’sabilitytocarryoxygen.COexposurecancausepeoplewithseveraltypesofheartdiseasetoexperiencechestpain(angina)whenexercisingorunderincreasedstress.ExtremelyhighlevelsofCOcancausedeath(EPA2012c).

Lead Leadisasoftandchemicallyresistantmetalthatisnaturallyfoundintheenvironment.Ithashistoricallybeenfoundinmotorvehiclesandindustrialsources,whichleadtotheEPA’seffortstoremovePbfromgasolinein1980andbeyond.TheaviationsectorcontinuestobeamajorsourceofPbemissionsfrompistonaircraft,asarecertainindustrialsectorslikeoreandmetalsprocessing(EPA2012b).EmissionsofPbfromthestudyareaareminimal(EPA2014a).

InadditiontoPbexposurethroughair,Pbcanalsoaccumulateinsoilsandothersediments,especiallyinurbanenvironmentswhereitwouldhaveaccumulatedfromyearsofexposurefromleadedgasoline.Leadexposurecanadverselyaffectthenervoussystem,kidneyfunction,immunesystem,reproductiveanddevelopmentsystems,andthecardiovascularsystem.Leadexposuremayalsocontributetobehavioralproblems,learningdeficits,andloweredIQininfantsandyoungchildren(EPA2012a).

Nitrogen Dioxide NO2isareddish‐browntodarkbrownreactivegasthatisformedduringhigh‐temperaturecombustionprocesses,suchasthoseoccurringinenginesandpowerplants.ThesumofnitricoxideandNO2iscommonlycallednitrogenoxides(NOx),butotheroxideslikenitrousoxideandnitricacidarealsoclassifiedasNOx.Mobilesources(46percent)andfuelcombustion(35percent)arethemainsourcesofNOxinEastBatonRougeParish(EPA2014a).

Page 11: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

Section 2    Regulatory Framework 

 

2‐2 118957‐95996 

ExposuretoNO2cancauseadverserespiratoryeffectsincludingairwayinflammation.NOxcanreactwithammonia,moisture,andothercompoundstoformsmallparticlesthatcanlodgedeeplyintosensitivepartsofthelungs.Thisactioncancauseorworsenrespiratorydiseaselikeemphysemaandbronchitisorcanaggregativeexistingheartdisease(EPA2013a).

Ozone O3isahighlyreactiveandunstablegasthatisformedintheatmospherethroughcomplexreactionswithsunlight,NOx,andvolatileorganiccompounds(VOCs).Hot,sunny,andcalmdayspromoteO3formation.TheEPAregulatesground‐levelO3,whichisnottobeconfusedwithstratosphericO3.Ground‐levelO3isclosetowherepeoplelive,breathe,andexerciseandcancauseadversehealtheffects;stratosphericO3ishighintheatmosphereandreducestheamountofultravioletlightenteringtheearth’satmosphere,whichactuallyhelpsprotectanimalandplantlife.

CertainpeopleareparticularlysensitivetotheeffectsofO3includingpeoplewithlungdisease,children,olderadults,andactivepeople.Generally,asO3concentrationsincrease,boththenumberofpeopleaffectedandtheseriousnessofthehealtheffectsincrease.Theeffectsofexposuretoground‐levelO3includecough,chesttightness,andpainupontakingadeepbreath;worseningofwheezingandotherasthmasymptoms;reducedlungfunction;andincreasehospitalizationsforrespiratorycauses.

O3alsohasdetrimentaleffectsontheenvironment.O3exposurecandamagecellsandleaftissue,reducingplants’abilitytophotosynthesizeandproducefood.Plantswillgrowmoreleavesinanattempttoproducemorefood,butthisresponsehastheneteffectofmakingplantsmoresusceptiblefordisease,pests,cold,anddrought.O3canalsodamagematerialslikerubber,plastics,fabrics,paintandmetals(EPA2003;EPA2009).Onlyabout14percentofEastBatonRougeParish’sVOCemissionscomefrommobilesources(EPA2014a).

Particulate Matter Particulatematter(PM)consistsofsolidandliquidparticlesofdust,soot,aerosols,andothermattersmallenoughtoremainsuspendedintheairforalongperiodoftime.PMisdividedintotwosizeclassesofparticles:particlesupto10microns1(PM10)andparticlesupto2.5microns(PM2.5).Toplacethesizesinperspective,ahumanhairisapproximately60micronsindiameter,whichmakesitsixtimeslargerthanthelargestcoarseparticleandover20timeslargerthanthelargestfineparticle.

Primaryparticlesarethosethataredirectlyemittedfromasource,suchasconstructionsites,unpavedroads,fields,smokestacks,orfires.BurningfuelsprimarilyproducesPM2.5,whileothersourceslikewindblowndustcontributetoPM10emissions.SecondaryformationofPM2.5canoccurfromcomplexreactionsintheatmosphereofpollutantslikeNOx,sulfuroxides,VOCs,andammonia.MostofthePM2.5pollutionintheUnitedStatesoccursfromthesesecondaryreactionsasopposedtodirect(primary)emissions.MorethanhalfofPM10inEastBatonRougeParishisattributedtodust.MainsourcesofPM2.5inEastBatonRougeParishareindustrialprocessesandfuelcombustion(EPA2014a).

Particlessmallerthan10microns(i.e.,PM10andPM2.5)representthatportionofPMthoughttorepresentthegreatesthazardtopublichealthbecausetheycanbecomedeeplyembeddedinsomeone’slungs.Thiscanleadtoadversehealtheffectsincludingprematuredeathinpeoplewith

                                                                 

1Amicronisaunitofmeasurementthatisone‐millionthofameter.Ameterisslightlylargerthan3feet.

Page 12: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

Section 2    Regulatory Framework 

 

    2‐3 118957‐95996 

heartorlungdisease,nonfatalheartattacks,irregularheartbeat,aggravatedasthma,decreasedlungfunction,andincreasedrespiratorysymptoms(e.g.,irritationoftheairways,coughing,ordifficultybreathing).Asidefromadversehealtheffects,PM2.5isprimarilyresponsibleforreducedvisibility(haze)intheUnitedStates.PMcanalsocauseaestheticdamagebystainingordamagingstoneandothermaterials(EPA2013c;EPA2014b).

Sulfur Dioxide SO2isformedwhenlocomotives,ships,andnon‐roaddieselequipmentburnsulfur‐containingfuel.Certainindustrialprocesses,suchaspetroleumrefiningandmetalprocessing,alsocontributetoSO2emissions.IndustrialprocessesaccountformostemissionsofSO2inEastBatonRougeParish(EPA2014a).HealtheffectsofSO2exposureincludingbronchoconstrictionandincreasedasthmasymptoms.SO2canalsoreactwithothercompoundsintheatmospheretoformsmallparticles.Exposuretotheresultingparticlescanaggravateexistingheartdisease,leadingtoincreasedhospitaladmissionsandprematuredeath(EPA2013c).

2.2 National Ambient Air Quality Standards UnderauthorityoftheCAA,EPAestablishedtheNationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS)forCO,Pb,NO2,O3,PM10,PM2.5,andSO2.Table2‐1presentsthecurrentNAAQSforthecriteriapollutants.ThefederalCAArequiresstatestoclassifyairqualitycontrolregions(orportionsthereof)aseitherattainmentornonattainmentwithrespecttocriteriaairpollutants,basedonwhethertheNAAQShavebeenachieved.

2.3 Attainment Status AreasthatexceedtheNAAQSaredesignatedasnonattainment.AreasthatpreviouslyexceededtheNAAQS,buthavesinceattainedthestandard,arecalledmaintenanceareas.StatesarealsorequiredtoprepareStateImplementationPlans(SIPs)containingemissionreductionstrategiestomaintaintheNAAQSforthoseareasdesignatedasmaintenanceandtoattaintheNAAQSforthoseareasdesignatedasnonattainment.

Certainpollutants,namelyO3andPM10,arefurthersubdividedbasedonhowcloseanareaistoachievingtheNAAQS.ThepossibleclassificationsfortheO3NAAQSaremarginal,moderate,serious,severe,orextreme.AreaswithworseclassificationsaregivenmoretimetoattaintheNAAQSthanareaswithbetterairquality.Forexample,anareaclassifiedasanextremenonattainmentareahasanattainmentdateofDecember31,2032(20yearsfromthedateofdesignation),whileanareaclassifiedasamarginalnonattainmentareahasuntilDecember31,2015toattaintheNAAQS(77FederalRegister[FR]30160).ThepossibleclassificationsforthePM10NAAQSaremoderateandserious.Section188oftheCAA(42UnitedStatesCode[USC]7513)statesthatallareasdesignatednonattainmentforthePM10NAAQSaretobeinitiallyclassifiedasmoderate;however,anareacanbereclassifiedasseriousiftheEPAdeterminesthattheareacannotpracticablyattainthestandardbytheattainmentdate.

Page 13: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

Section 2    Regulatory Framework 

 

2‐4 118957‐95996 

Table 2‐1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

Pollutant  Averaging Time NAAQS Primary 

NAAQS Secondary 

Violation Criteria 

CO 

1 Hour 35 ppm (40 mg/m3) 

N/A  Not to be exceeded more than once per year 

8 Hour 9 ppm (10 mg/m3) 

NO2 

1 Hour 100 ppb (188 µg/m3) 

N/A 98th percentile of 1‐hour daily maximum concentrations, averaged over three years 

Annual 53 ppb (100 µg/m

3) Same as Primary Standard 

Annual mean 

O3  8 Hour (2008) 0.075 ppm (147 µg/m

3) Same as Primary Standard 

Annual fourth‐highest daily maximum 8‐hour concentration, averaged over three years 

Pb Rolling 3‐Month Average 

0.15 µg/m3 

Same as Primary Standard 

Not to be exceeded 

PM10  24 Hour  150 µg/m3 Same as Primary Standard 

Not to be exceeded more than once per year on average over three years 

PM2.5 24 Hour  35 µg/m3 

Same as Primary Standard 

98th percentile, averaged over three years 

Annual  12 µg/m3  12 µg/m3 Annual mean, averaged over three years 

SO2 

1 Hour 75 ppb (196 µg/m3) 

N/A 99th percentile of 1‐hour daily maximum concentrations, averaged over three years 

3 Hour  N/A 0.5 ppm(1,300 µg/m3) 

Not to be exceeded more than once per year 

24 Hour 0.14 ppm (366 µg/m3) (1) 

N/A 

Not to be exceeded more than once per year 

Annual 0.030 ppm (79 µg/m

3) (1) Annual mean 

Source:  EPA 2012d; 40 CFR 50. Notes:  (1) On June 22, 2010, the 24‐hour and annual primary SO2 NAAQS were revoked (75 Federal Register [FR] 35520). The 1971 SO2 NAAQS (0.14 

parts per million [ppm] and 0.030 ppm for 24‐hour and annual averaging periods) remain in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2010 1‐hour primary standard. EPA has designated parts of 16 states as nonattainment based on 2009‐2011 monitoring data, effective October 4, 2013, but deferred action on all other areas (78 FR 47191). LDEQ recommended to EPA on May 26, 2011 that East Baton Rouge Parish be designated as in attainment (LDEQ 2011). EPA has not designated attainment status for East Baton Rouge Parish.   Key: µg/m

3 = micrograms per cubic meter; CO = carbon monoxide; mg/m

3 = milligrams per cubic meter; N/A = not applicable; NAAQS = National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard; NO2 = nitrogen dioxide; O3 = ozone; Pb = lead; PM10 = inhalable particulate matter; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter; ppb = parts per billion; ppm = parts per million; SO2 = sulfur dioxide  

ThestudyareaiswithinEastBatonRougeParish,whichisinattainmentofCO,NO2,SO2,PM10,PM2.5andPb(EPA2013e).TheParishwasdesignatedasinmarginalnonattainmentofthe20088‐hourO3standard,effectiveJuly20,2012,andisrequiredtoattainthestandardbyDecember31,2015.Theprevious19978‐hourO3standardwasrevokedayearafterthe20088‐hourozonedesignationsbecameeffective.However,maintenanceobligationsremaininplace(70FR44470).EastBatonRougeParishwasredesignatedasinattainmentofthe19978‐hourO3standard,effectiveDecember30,2011,andtheareahasanEPAapprovedmaintenanceplanthrough2022.

CriteriaairpollutantsaremonitoredatfivestationsinEastBatonRougeParish.Themostrecentthreeyearsofavailabledata(2011‐2013)fromtheBatonRouge‐Capitolstation(SiteID220330009;1061‐ALeesvilleAvenue,BatonRouge,LA)aresummarizedinTable2‐2.

Page 14: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

Section 2    Regulatory Framework 

 

    2‐5 118957‐95996 

Table 2‐2 Ambient (Background) Air Quality Data 

Pollutant (1)  NAAQS  2011  2012  2013 Design Value (2011‐2013) 

CO 

Maximum 1‐hour concentration (ppm)  35 1.8 2.2 2.1 N/A 

Maximum 8‐hour concentration (ppm)  9 1.5 1.9 2 N/A 

Number of days exceeding 1‐hour standard  0 0 0  

Number of days exceeding 8‐hour standard  0 0 0  

    

Pb (2)   

Maximum 24‐hour concentration (µg/m3)  ‐‐ 0.003 0.009 0.005 ‐‐ 

    

NO2   

98th percentile 1‐hour concentration (ppb)  100 56 51 48 52 

Number of days exceeding 1‐hour standard  0 0 0  

    

O3   

4th high 8‐hour concentration (ppm)  0.075 0.080 0.072 0.066 0.073 

Number of days exceeding 2008 8‐hour standard 5 2 0  

    

PM10   

Maximum 24‐hour concentration (µg/m3)  150 74 76 81 N/A 

Number of days exceeding 24‐hour standard  0 0 0  

    

PM2.5   

98th percentile 24‐hour concentration (µg/m3) 35 23 22 20 22 

Annual mean (µg/m3)  15 10.1 9.8 8.4 9.4 

Number of days exceeding 24‐hour standard  0 0 0  

    

SO2 (3)   

99th percentile 1‐hour concentration (ppb)  75 31 32 21 28 

24‐hour concentration (ppb)  140 17 37 48 ‐‐ 

Number of days exceeding 1‐hour standard  0 0 0  

Number of days exceeding 24‐hour standard  0 0 0  

Source: EPA 2013d. Notes: (1) An exceedance is not necessarily a violation. Violations are defined in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 50. Data from 1061‐A Leesville 

Ave, Baton Rouge, LA (Site ID 220330009). (2) 3‐month average statistics were not available from the EPA. 

(3) 3‐hour and annual average SO2 concentrations were not available from EPA. 

Key: 

‐‐ = There was insufficient (or no) data available to determine this value; µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; CO = carbon monoxide; N/A = 

not applicable; NAAQS = National Ambient Air Quality Standard; NO2 = nitrogen dioxide; O3 = ozone; Pb = lead; PM10 = inhalable particulate 

matter; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter; ppm = parts per million; SO2 = sulfur dioxide

2.4 Transportation Conformity Approval,funding,orimplementationofFederalHighwayAdministration(FHWA)andFederalTransitAdministration(FTA)projectsissubjecttothetransportationconformityregulationsundertheCAA

Page 15: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

Section 2    Regulatory Framework 

 

2‐6 118957‐95996 

(40CodeofFederalRegulations[CFR]93SubpartA).Eachmetropolitanplanningareaisrequiredtodevelopanofficialmetropolitantransportationplanpursuantto23CFRPart450.Ifapotentialprojectisincludedinatransportationplanandtransportationimprovementprogram(TIP)thatconformtotheSIPandtheCAAanditsamendments,thentheprojectisalreadyincludedintheemissionbudgetsdevelopedfortheregion.Thus,aunique,regionalanalysisofprojectemissionswouldnotberequired;however,analysisregardingpossiblelocalizedimpactsisstillrequired.TheMPO,ortheCapitalRegionPlanningCommission(CRPC),inthestudyarea,isresponsiblefortransportationplanninganddeterminingregionalconformity.

InorderforaFHWA/FTAprojecttobefoundtoconform,regardlessofwhetheritisinaconformingtransportationplanorTIPornot,thefollowingcriteriaandproceduresmustbefollowed:

§93.110–Theconformitydeterminationmustbebaseduponthemostrecentplanningassumptionsinforceatthetimetheconformityanalysisbegins.

§93.111–Theconformitydeterminationmustbebasedonthelatestemissionestimationmodelavailable.

§93.112–Conformitymustbedeterminedaccordingtotheconsultationproceduresin40CFR93SubpartA.

§93.114–TheremustbeacurrentlyconformingtransportationplanandcurrentlyconformingTIPatthetimeofprojectapproval.

§93.116–TheprojectmustnotcauseorcontributetoanynewlocalizedCO,PM10,and/orPM2.5violationsorincreasethefrequencyofseverityofanyexistingCO,PM10,andPM2.5violations.

§93.117–TheprojectmustcomplywithanyPM10andPM2.5controlmeasuresintheapplicableSIP.

Transportationconformityappliestononattainmentandmaintenanceareas.Becausethestudyareaisinmaintenanceforthe19978‐hourO3standardandisdesignatedasnonattainmentofthe2008O3standard,transportationconformityregulationsapply.However,the1997O3NAAQSwasrevokedfortransportationconformitypurposesayearaftertheeffectivedateofdesignationsforthe2008O3NAAQS.AsofJuly20,2013,transportationconformityrequirementsdonotapplytothe1997O3NAAQS(77FR30160).

TheprojectisincludedintheAirQualityConformityAnalysisoftheMetropolitanTransportationPlan2037andTransportationImprovementProgram2013‐2017fortheBatonRougeOzoneNon‐AttainmentArea(CRPC2013).ThisdocumentwasapprovedbyEPAonJuly12,2013andbyFHWAonJuly17,2013.Theprojectwouldonlyneedtoconsiderlocalizedproject‐levelimpacts.

2.5 Air Toxics InadditiontothecriteriaairpollutantsforwhichthereareNAAQS,EPAalsoregulatesairtoxics.Mostairtoxicsoriginatefromhuman‐madesources,includingon‐roadmobilesources(e.g.,carsandtrucks),non‐roadmobilesources(e.g.,airplanesandconstructionequipment),areasources(e.g.,drycleaners)andstationarysources(e.g.,factories,refineries,andpowerplants).EPAhasalsorecognizedemissionsofairtoxicsfrommobilesourcesasapotentialenvironmentalandhealthconcern.TheinterimguidancereleasedbyFHWAdatedFebruary2007requiresdiscussionofMobileSourceAir

Page 16: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

Section 2    Regulatory Framework 

 

    2‐7 118957‐95996 

Toxics(MSATs)inNationalEnvironmentalPolicyAct(NEPA)documents.TheguidancewasupdatedinSeptember2009andDecember2012.

ThecurrentguidanceonMSATsisFHWA’sInterimGuidanceUpdateonAirToxicAnalysisinNEPADocuments,releasedonDecember6,2012.ThisguidanceadvisesonwhenandhowtoanalyzeMSATsintheNEPAprocessforhighwayprojects.ThisguidanceisinterimbecauseMSATscienceisstillevolving.Currently,therearelimitationsontoolsandtechniquesforevaluatingpotentialproject‐levelhealthrisksfromMSATexposure.FHWAregularlyupdatestheguidancebasedonnewscientificdata.

Page 17: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management
Page 18: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

 

    3‐1 118957‐95996 

Section 3    

Impact Analysis 

Impactsoftheproposedprojecttotheairqualityinthestudyareaarediscussedinthissection.

3.1 Vehicle Emissions Theimpactresultingfromanewtransportationprojectrangesfromintensifyingexistingairpollutionproblemstoimprovingtheambientairquality.Changingtrafficpatternsareaprimaryconcernwhendeterminingtheimpactofanewroadwayoranexistinghighwayfacility.

3.1.1 Criteria Pollutants MotorvehiclesemitCO,NOx,VOC,PM10,PM2.5,SO2,andPb(listedinorderofdecreasingemissionrate).Emissionsofcriteriapollutantsasaresultoftheimplementationoftheprojectarediscussedbelow.

Carbon Monoxide 

MotorvehiclesareconsideredamainsourceofCOinthestudyarea(EPA2014a).COlevelsmeasuredinEastBatonRougeParisharewellbelowtheNAAQS,andthisprojectisnotexpectedtoproduceaprojectedviolationoftheCONAAQS.

ProjectsinattainmentareaswouldstillberequiredtoconductaCOhotspotanalysisiftheprojectisexpectedtoadverselyaffectintersectionsthatareatLOSD,E,orForthosethatwouldchangetheLOSofanintersectiontoD,E,orFduetoincreasedtrafficvolumesrelatedtotheproject(40CFR93.123).AlthoughtheprojectaffectsintersectionswithacurrentLOSofE,theprojectisdesignedtoincreasecapacitytoaccommodatefuturegrowthinregionaltrafficvolume.Theproposedactionisnotanticipatedtoincreasetrafficvolumesorcauseadverseimpactsonintersectionsandlocalairquality;therefore,noadditionalproject‐levelanalysisisrequired.

Ozone, Volatile Organic Compounds, and Nitrogen Dioxide 

MotorvehiclesareregardedascommonsourcesofVOCandNOx.VOCandNOxemittedfromvehiclesarecarriedintotheatmospherewheretheyreactwithsunlighttoformO3andNO2.AutomotiveemissionsofVOCandNOxareexpectedtodecreaseinthefuturebecauseofthecontinuedinstallationandmaintenanceofpollutioncontroldevicesonnewcars.However,regardingarea‐wideemissions,thesetechnologicalimprovementsmaybeoffsetbytheincreasingnumberofcarsinthearea.

ThephotochemicalreactionsthatformO3andNO2requireseveralhourstooccur.Forthisreason,thepeaklevelsofO3generallyoccurtentotwentykilometers(approximately6to12miles)downwindofthesourceofVOCemissions.UrbanareasasawholeareregardedassourcesofVOC,notindividualstreetsandhighways.Theemissionsofallsourcesinanurbanareamixintheatmosphere,and,inthepresenceofsunlight,thismixturereactstoformO3,NO2,andotherphotochemicaloxidants.TheprojectislocatedinamarginalnonattainmentareaforO3.ThisprojectisnotexpectedtocauseadverseimpactonO3orNO2concentrations.

Page 19: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

Section 3    Impact Analysis 

 

3‐2 118957‐95996 

Particulate Matter and Sulfur Dioxide 

MotorvehiclesarenotregardedassignificantsourcesofPM10,PM2.5,andSO2.Nationwide,highwaysourcesaccountforlessthan7percentofPMemissionsandlessthan2percentofSO2emissions.PM10,PM2.5,andSO2emissionsarepredominantlytheresultofnon‐highwaysources(e.g.,industrial,commercial,andagricultural).BecauseemissionsofPM10,PM2.5,andSO2fromautomobilesareverylowandcurrentmonitoredlevelsarewellbelowtheNAAQS,thetrafficontheprojectwillnotcauseairqualitystandardsforPM10,PM2.5,andSO2toexceedtheNAAQS.

Projectsthathaveasignificantnumberofdieselvehicles,areanticipatedtosignificantlyincreasethenumberofdieselvehicles,areanticipatedtoaffectintersectionsthatareLOSD,E,orF,orareanticipatedtochangetheLOSofanintersectiontoD,E,orFarerequiredtoconductahotspotanalysis(40CFR93.123).ProjectsthatinvolvebusandrailterminalsandfacilitieswithAADTgreaterthan125,000,where8percentormoreofthatAADTisdieseltrucks,areoftensubjecttothisrequirementduetoanincreaseindieseluse(71FR12468).AninteragencyconsultationprocesswouldbeneededtodetermineifaprojectwouldrequirePM10andPM2.5hot‐spotanalyses.TheprojectisnotinanonattainmentareaforPM2.5andisnotexpectedtocauseasignificantincreaseinthenumberofdieselvehicles.Therefore,aPM2.5hotspotanalysisisnotrequired.

Lead 

Automobileswithoutcatalyticconverterscanburnregulargasoline.TheburningofregulargasolineemitsPbasaresultofregulargasolinecontainingtetraethyllead,whichisaddedbyrefineriestoincreasetheoctaneratingofthefuel.Carswithcatalyticconvertersburnunleadedgasoline,therebyeliminatingPbemissions.Also,theEPAhasrequiredthereductioninthePbcontentofleadedgasoline.TheoverallaveragePbcontentofgasolinein1974wasapproximately0.53gramperliter.By1989,thiscompositeaveragehaddroppedto0.003gramsperliter.TheCAAAmendmentsof1990madethesale,supply,ortransportofleadedgasolineorPbadditivesunlawfulafterDecember31,1995.Becauseofthesereasons,itisnotexpectedthattrafficontheproposedprojectwillcausetheNAAQSforPbtobeexceeded.

Hooper Road Emissions 

NEPArequiresprojectemissionstobecomparedtothefutureNo‐Buildconditions(i.e.2037emissionswithouttheproject).FuturetrafficvolumeonHooperRoadisexpectedtobesimilarwithorwithouttheproject.Withouttheproject,HooperRoadwouldexperiencemorecongestionandlocalizedemissionsfromidlingvehicles.ComparedtotheNo‐Buildcondition,theBuildconditionemissionsareanticipatedtobesimilarorless.

3.1.2 Mobile Source Air Toxics  Motorvehiclescontributesignificantlytoemissionsofacrolein,benzene,1,3‐butadiene,dieselPM(includingdieselexhaustorganicgases),formaldehyde,naphthaleneandpolycyclicorganicmatter.Ofthesecompounds,FHWAconsidersdieselPMasthedominantMSATofconcern.

TheFHWAhasdevelopedatieredapproachforanalyzingMSATsinNEPAdocuments,dependingonthespecificprojectcircumstances:

NoanalysisforprojectswithnopotentialformeaningfulMSATeffects;

QualitativeanalysisforprojectswithlowpotentialMSATeffects;or

Page 20: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

 Section 3     Impact Analysis 

 

    3‐3 118957‐95996 

QuantitativeanalysistodifferentiatealternativesforprojectswithhigherpotentialMSATeffects.

Theproposedprojectinvolveswideningofastatehighway.AsshowninTable1‐1,thedesignyearAADTfortheproposedconnectionisprojectedtobelessthan140,000to150,000vehiclesperday,whichistheFHWAcriterionforaqualitativeanalysis;theprojectisexpectedtohavelowpotentialMSATeffects.

Vehiclemixisnotanticipatedtochangeduetothisproject;therefore,MSATsemittedwouldbeproportionaltothevehiclemilestraveled(VMT).Table3‐1showstheestimateddailyVMTforthisproject.Also,speedmayincreaseduetoadditionalcapacity,increasingtheefficiencyofthetransportationnetwork.

 Table 3‐1 Estimated Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled  

  Existing (2013)  Design Year (2037) 

Project VMT (miles)  43,106  69,332

Note: VMT calculated based on corridor length (14,700 ft) and AADT presented in Table 1‐1. 

EmissionswilllikelybelowerthanpresentlevelsinthedesignyearasaresultofEPA’snationalcontrolprogramsthatareprojectedtoreduceannualMSATemissionsbyover80percentfrom2010to2050.Localconditionsmaydifferfromthesenationalprojectionsintermsoffleetmixandturnover,VMTgrowthrates,andlocalcontrolmeasures.However,themagnitudeoftheEPA‐projectedreductionsissogreat,evenafteraccountingforVMTgrowth,thatMSATemissionsinthestudyareaarelikelytobelowerinthefutureinvirtuallyalllocations.

MSATscienceisstillevolvingandtheavailabletechnicaltoolsdonotenabletheEPAtopredicttheproject‐specifichealthimpactsoftheemissionchangesassociatedwiththealternativeevaluatedintheEnvironmentalImpactStatement(EIS).Duetotheselimitations,thefollowingdiscussionisincludedinaccordancewithCEQregulations(40CFR1502.22)regardingincompleteorunavailableinformation.

InFHWA'sview,informationisincompleteorunavailabletocrediblypredicttheproject‐specifichealthimpactsduetochangesinMSATemissionsassociatedwithaproposedsetofhighwayalternatives.Theoutcomeofsuchanassessment,adverseornot,wouldbeinfluencedmorebytheuncertaintyintroducedintotheprocessthroughassumptionandspeculation,ratherthananygenuineinsightintotheactualhealthimpactsdirectlyattributabletoMSATexposureassociatedwithaproposedaction.

TheEPAisresponsibleforprotectingthepublichealthandwelfarefromanyknownoranticipatedeffectofanairpollutant.TheEPAisinthecontinualprocessofassessinghumanhealtheffects,exposures,andrisksposedbyairpollutants.OtherorganizationsarealsoactiveintheresearchandanalysesofthehumanhealtheffectsofMSAT,includingtheHealthEffectsInstitute.

Themethodologiesforforecastinghealthimpactsincludeemissionsmodeling;dispersionmodeling;exposuremodeling;andthenfinaldeterminationofhealthimpacts‐‐eachstepintheprocessbuildingonthemodelpredictionsobtainedinthepreviousstep.AllareencumberedbytechnicalshortcomingsoruncertainsciencethatpreventsamorecompletedifferentiationoftheMSAThealthimpactsamongasetofprojectalternatives.Thesedifficultiesaremagnifiedforlifetime(i.e.,70year)assessments,

Page 21: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

Section 3    Impact Analysis 

 

3‐4 118957‐95996 

particularlybecauseunsupportableassumptionswouldhavetobemaderegardingchangesintravelpatternsandvehicletechnology(whichaffectsemissionsrates)overthattimeframe,sincesuchinformationisunavailable.Itisparticularlydifficulttoreliablyforecast70‐yearlifetimeMSATconcentrationsandexposurenearroadways;todeterminetheportionoftimethatpeopleareactuallyexposedataspecificlocation;andtoestablishtheextentattributabletoaproposedaction,especiallygiventhatsomeoftheinformationneededisunavailable.

ThereareconsiderableuncertaintiesassociatedwiththeexistingestimatesoftoxicityofthevariousMSAT,becauseoffactorssuchaslow‐doseextrapolationandtranslationofoccupationalexposuredatatothegeneralpopulation.Asaresult,thereisnonationalconsensusonairdose‐responsevaluesassumedtoprotectthepublichealthandwelfareforMSATcompoundsand,inparticular,fordieselPM.

Thereisalsothelackofanationalconsensusonanacceptablelevelofrisk.ThecurrentcontextistheprocessusedbytheEPAasprovidedbytheCAAtodeterminewhethermorestringentcontrolsarerequiredtoprovideanamplemarginofsafetytoprotectpublichealthortopreventanadverseenvironmentaleffectforindustrialsourcessubjecttothemaximumachievablecontroltechnologystandards,suchasbenzeneemissionsfromrefineries.Thedecisionframeworkisatwo‐stepprocess.ThefirststeprequiresEPAtodeterminea"safe"or"acceptable"levelofriskduetoemissionsfromasource,whichisgenerallynogreaterthanapproximately100inamillion.Additionalfactorsareconsideredinthesecondstep,thegoalofwhichistomaximizethenumberofpeoplewithriskslessthan1inamillionduetoemissionsfromasource.Theresultsofthisstatutorytwo‐stepprocessdonotguaranteethatcancerrisksfromexposuretoairtoxicsarelessthan1inamillion;insomecases,theresidualriskdeterminationcouldresultinmaximumindividualcancerrisksthatareashighasapproximately100inamillion.InaJune2008decision,theU.S.CourtofAppealsfortheDistrictofColumbiaCircuitupheldEPA'sapproachtoaddressingriskinitstwo‐stepdecisionframework.Informationisincompleteorunavailabletoestablishthateventhelargestofhighwayprojectswouldresultinlevelsofriskgreaterthansafeoracceptable.

Becauseofthelimitationsinthemethodologiesforforecastinghealthimpacts,anypredicteddifferenceinhealthimpactsbetweenalternativesislikelytobemuchsmallerthantheuncertaintiesassociatedwithpredictingtheimpacts.Consequently,theresultsofsuchassessmentswouldnotbeusefultodecisionmakers,whowouldneedtoweighthisinformationagainstprojectbenefits,suchasreducingtrafficcongestion,accidentrates,andfatalities,plusimprovedaccessforemergencyresponse,thatarebettersuitedforquantitativeanalysis.

3.2 Construction Emissions Heavyconstructionequipment,includingexcavators,scrapers,graders,rollers,compactors,andpavers,maybeusedtoclearandgrub,excavate,grade,andpaveforconstructionofnewroadways.Contractorswillberesponsibleformaintaining,repairing,andadjustingallconstructionequipmenttokeeptheminfullsatisfactoryconditiontominimizepollutantemissions.Equipmentemissionsmaybereducedbyusingnewer,lower‐emittingequipment,retrofittingolderequipmentengines,andcontrollingactivity.

Measuresshouldbetakentoreduceanyfugitivedustgeneratedbyconstructionactivities.Adustcontrolplanmaybepreparedtooutlinecontrolmethodsspecifictotheconstructionsite.Dustcontrolmethodsmayincludewateringareasofdisturbance,coveringhaultrucks,stabilizingorcoveringstockpileareas,washingequipmenttominimizetrackout,andreducingspeedsonunpavedroads.

Page 22: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

 

    4‐1 118957‐95996 

Section 4    

Conclusions 

ThestudyareaislocatedinEastBatonRougeParish,whichisinattainmentofCO,NO2,SO2,PM10,PM2.5andPb(EPA2013e).TheproposedprojectiswithintheBatonRougenonattainmentareafor2008O3NAAQSandisinmaintenanceofthe19978‐hourO3standard.

Transportationconformityappliestononattainmentandmaintenanceareas.However,the1997O3NAAQSwasrevokedfortransportationconformitypurposesasofJuly20,2013;therefore,transportationconformityrequirementsdonotapplytothe1997O3NAAQS.EastBatonRougeParishisinnonattainmentofthe2008O3NAAQS;therefore,transportationconformityappliestothe2008O3NAAQS.TheprojectisincludedintheEPAandFHWAapprovedairqualityconformityanalysis,AirQualityConformityAnalysisoftheMetropolitanTransportationPlan2037andTransportationImprovementProgram2013‐2017fortheBatonRougeOzoneNon‐AttainmentArea(CRPC2013),thusaregionalanalysisisnotrequired.

Theprojectdoesnotinvolveasignificantnumberofdieselvehiclesandisnotanticipatedtosignificantlyincreasethenumberofdieselvehicles,adverselyaffectintersectionsthatareLOSD,E,orF,orchangetheLOSofanintersectiontoD,E,orF.Therefore,theprojectwouldnotberequiredtoconductaproject‐levelhotspotanalysisforCOorPM.

NosignificantMSATimpactsareanticipatedfromthisproject.Airtoxicsanalysisisacontinuingareaofresearch.Atthistime,thetoolsandtechniquesforassessingproject‐specifichealthoutcomesasaresultoflifetimeMSATexposureremainlimited.

Emissionsfromconstructionoftheproposedprojectshouldbeminimizedusingnewer,lower‐emittingequipment,retrofittingolderequipmentengines,controllingequipmentactivityandbyimplementingadustcontrolplan.

Page 23: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management
Page 24: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

 

     5‐1 

118957‐95996 

Section 5    

References 

“AirQualityDesignationsforthe2010SulfurDioxide(SO2)PrimaryNationalAmbientAirQualityStandard.”FederalRegister78(5August2013):47191‐47205.

CapitalRegionPlanningCommission(CRPC).2013.AirQualityConformityAnalysisoftheMetropolitanTransportationPlan2037andTransportationImprovementProgram2013‐2017fortheBatonRougeOzoneNon‐AttainmentArea.July.

CDMSmith.2014.TrafficStudyReportHooperRoad:BlackwaterRdtoSullivanRd.PreparedforSIGMAConsultingGroup,Inc.August.

FederalHighwayAdministration(FHWA).2012.InterimGuidanceUpdateonMobileSourceAirToxicAnalysisinNEPA.December.Availableonlineat:http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/air_quality/air_toxics/policy_and_guidance/aqintguidmem.cfm[AccessedonAugust5,2013].

“IdentificationofOzoneAreasforwhichthe1‐HourStandardhasbeenRevokedandTechnicalCorrectiontoPhase1Rule.”FederalRegister70(3Aug2005):44470‐44478.

“Implementationofthe2008NationalAmbientAirQualityStandardsforOzone:NonattainmentAreaClassificationsApproach,AttainmentDeadlinesandRevocationofthe1997OzoneStandardsforTransportationConformityPurposes.”FederalRegister77(21May2012):30160‐30171.

“PM2.5andPM10Hot‐SpotAnalysesinProject‐LevelTransportationConformityDeterminationsfortheNewPM2.5andPM10NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards.”FederalRegister71(10March2006):12468‐12511.

“PrimaryNationalAmbientAirQualityStandardforSulfurDioxide.”FederalRegister75(22June2010):35520‐35603.

UnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA).2003.Ozone:GoodUpHigh,BadNearbyBrochure.EPA‐451/K‐03‐001.Availableonlineat:http://epa.gov/airquality/ozonepollution/pdfs/ozonegb.pdf[AccessedonJune21,2014].

EPA.2009.OzoneandYourHealthBrochure.EPA‐456/F‐09‐001.Availableonlineat:http://www.epa.gov/airnow/ozone‐c.pdf[AccessedonJune21,2014].

EPA.2012a.LeadHealthEffectsHomepage.March13.Availableonlineat:http://www.epa.gov/airquality/lead/health.html[AccessedonJune21,2014].

EPA.2012b.LeadinAirHomepage.April12.Availableonlineat:http://www.epa.gov/airquality/lead/[AccessedonJune21,2014].

EPA.2012c.CarbonMonoxideHealthEffectsHomepage.December10.Availableonlineat:http://www.epa.gov/airquality/carbonmonoxide/health.html[AccessedonJune21,2014].

Page 25: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management

Section 5   References  

5‐2 118957‐95996 

EPA.2012d.NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS)Homepage.December14.Availableonlineat:http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html[AccessedonJune9,2014].

EPA.2013a.NO2HealthEffectsHomepage.February14.Availableonlineat:http://www.epa.gov/airquality/nitrogenoxides/health.html[AccessedonJune21,2014].

EPA.2013b.ParticulateMatter(PM)BasicInformationHomepage.March18.Availableonlineat:http://www.epa.gov/airquality/particlepollution/basic.html[AccessedonJune21,2014].

EPA.2013c.SulfurDioxideHealthEffects.June28.Availableonlineat:http://www.epa.gov/airquality/sulfurdioxide/health.html[AccessedonJune21,2014].

EPA.2013d.AirDataMonitorValuesReport.September9.Availableonlineat:http://www.epa.gov/airdata/ad_rep_mon.html[AccessedonJune10,2014].

EPA.2013e.TheGreenBookNonattainmentAreasforCriteriaPollutants.December5.Availableonlineat:http://www.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/[AccessedonJune9,2014].

EPA,2014a.AirEmissionSourcesHomepage.March18.Availableonlineat:www.epa.gov/air/emissions/index.htm.[AccessedonJune21,2014].

EPA.2014b.ParticulateMatter(PM)Health.May6.Availableonlineat:http://www.epa.gov/airquality/particlepollution/health.html[AccessedonJune21,2014].

LouisianaDepartmentofEnvironmentalQuality(LDEQ).2011.LettertoUSEPARegion6RegardingtheStateofLouisianaRecommendationsforAreaDesignationsUndertheJune2010SulfurDioxideNAAQS.May26.

Page 26: Appendix G, Air Quality Analysis · 2016-01-26 · City/Parish Project No. 12-CS-HC-0017 State Project No. H.002316/H.002317 Air Quality Analysis Prepared for: ... Air quality management