Appendix B DATA FORMS - columbiagasohio.com

NORTHERN COLUMBUS LOOP NATURAL GAS PIPELINE PROJECT (PHASE VII) – ALTERNATE ROUTE WETLAND AND WATERBODY DELINEATION REPORT

B.1

Appendix B DATA FORMS

B.1 WETLAND DETERMINATION FORMS

of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193707055 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: Slope (%): 0 Latitude: 40.221205 Longitude: Datum: WGS 1984 Community ID: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: N/A Dir: N/ASUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No

HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators (Check here if indicators are not present ):

Primary: Secondary:A1 - Surface Water B9 - Water-Stained Leaves B6 - Surface Soil CracksA2 - High Water Table B13 - Aquatic Fauna B10 - Drainage PatternsA3 - Saturation B14 - True Aquatic Plants C2 - Dry-Season Water TableB1 - Water Marks C1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Odor C8 - Crayfish BurrowsB2 - Sediment Deposits C3 - Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots C9 - Saturation Visible on Aerial ImageryB3 - Drift Deposits C4 - Presence of Reduced Iron D1 - Stunted or Stressed PlantsB4 - Algal Mat or Crust C6 - Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils D2 - Geomorphic PositionB5 - Iron Deposits C7 - Thin Muck Surface D5 - FAC-Neutral TestB7 - Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery D9 - Gauge or Well DataB8 - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface Other (Explain in Remarks)

Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: -- (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: -- (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: -- (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Blount silt loam, ground moraine, 2-4% slopes

Top BottomDepth Depth Horizon % % Type Location

0 7 -- 10YR 3/3 94 5YR 3/4 6 C M7 10 -- 10YR 4/3 95 7.5YR 4/4 5 C M10 17 -- 10YR 4/3 91 7.5YR 4/6 6 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- 7.5YR 6/8 3 C M17 20 -- 10YR 4/4 55 7.5YR 5/8 15 C M-- -- -- 10YR 4/2 30 -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

NRCS Hydric Soil Field Indicators (check here if indicators are not present ):A1- Histosol S4 - Sandy Gleyed Matrix A16 - Coast Prairie Redox A2 - Histic Epipedon S5 - Sandy Redox S7 - Dark SurfaceA3 - Black Histic S6 - Stripped Matrix F12 - Iron-Manganese MassesA4 - Hydrogen Sulfide F1 - Loamy Muck Mineral TF12 - Very Shallow Dark SurfaceA5 - Stratified Layers F2 - Loamy Gleyed Matrix Other (Explain in Remarks)A10 - 2 cm Muck F3 - Depleted MatrixA11 - Depleted Below Dark Surface F6 - Redox Dark SurfaceA12 - Thick Dark Surface F7 - Depleted Dark SurfaceS1 - Sandy Muck Mineral F8 - Redox DepressionsS3 - 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat 1 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

02/20/20

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMMidwest Region

Indicators for Problematic Soils 1

Yes NoAre normal circumstances present?

Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No

PFO1CBlount silt loam, ground moraine, 2-4% slopes NWI/WWI Classification:

Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

silty clay loamColor (Moist)

Restrictive Layer (If Observed)

Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?

Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) (Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered/Coated Sand Grains; Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix)

Terrace Local Relief: None-83.103259

silty clay

Color (Moist)Redox Features

Upland

silty claysilty clay

--

Remarks:

--


Remarks:

N/A

NWI point, not a wetlands

NoYes

Matrix Texture(e.g. clay, sand, loam)

N - lternate outeColumbia Gas of OhioAngela Sjollema Charlie Allen

DelawareOhioN/ASP01

----

✔✔

✔

of 2

Project/Site: Wetland ID: SP01

VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non-native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius)

% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 75 Y FACW2. 5 N FACW (A)3. 2 N FACU4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

82 FACW spp. 77 x 2 = 154

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 74 x 4 = 296

1. 5 Y FACU UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. 2 N FACW3. 5 Y FACU Total 151 (A) 450 (B)4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.9806. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

12 Yes No Prevalence Index is 3.0 *Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 30 Y FACU2. 2 N FACU3. 25 Y FACU4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

57

1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No4. -- -- --5. -- -- --

0

Additional Remarks:

NCL - alternate route N/A

* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius)

Total Cover =

----

--

43% open ground

--

Woody plants 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.

Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. tall.

Total Cover =

Midwest RegionWETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM

--

Quercus palustrisCarya laciniosa 1

5

Species Name

Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:

Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

Total Cover =

Fraxinus americana--

Quercus palustris

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft radius)

--

Rosa multiflora

----

Definitions of Vegetation Strata:

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft radius)

--

Multiply by:

20%

--

Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:

----

--

Fagus grandifolia

Tree -

--

Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft. tall.

--

--

--

Total Cover =

Fagus grandifolia

Fraxinus americana

--Fagus grandifolia

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--

-- Total % Cover of:

------

--

------

Woody Vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft. in height.

✔

✔

✔

of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 0.5 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: -- (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: -- (in.)



0 14 -- 10YR 4/3 100 -- -- -- -- --14 16 -- 10YR 4/3 97 7.5YR 5/8 3 C M16 20 -- 10YR 5/2 58 7.5YR 5/8 15 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


02/20/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


PEM1CBlount silt loam, ground moraine, 0-2% slopes NWI/WWI Classification:


clay loamColor (Moist)


Remarks:




--


Uplands

------

Remarks: Surface water could be from recent snow melt

--

clay loamclay

Remarks:

N/A

Tilled an tield ag land. NWI point, not a wetland

NoYes


NCL - alternate routeColumbia Gas of Ohio

Charlie AllenDelawareOhioN/ASP02

✔

✔✔

✔

of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. -- -- --2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

0 FACW spp. 20 x 2 = 40

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 35 x 4 = 140

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 45 x 5 = 225

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 100 (A) 405 (B)4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.0506. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%


1. 20 Y FACW2. 35 Y FACU3. 45 Y UPL4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100


0

Additional Remarks:




Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--

---- 1

3

Species Name



Total Cover =

Setaria glauca--

--


--

Echinochloa crus-galli

----



--

Multiply by:

33%

--


----

--

Setaria faberi

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


✔

✔

of 2







0 12 -- 10YR 3/2 100 -- -- -- -- --12 20 -- 10YR 4/2 84 5YR 3/4 2 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- 10YR 5/4 10 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- 10YR 5/8 4 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


02/20/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No




silty clayColor (Moist)


Remarks:




silty clay


Upland

------

Remarks:

--


Remarks:

N/A

Upland point for Wetland 1

NoYes



Charlie AllenDelawareOhioWetland 1SP03

of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 40 Y FAC2. 50 Y FACW (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

90 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. 70 Y FACW UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. 2 N FACU3. -- -- -- Total 0 (A) 0 (B)4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = NA6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%


1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

0


0

Additional Remarks:

NCL - alternate route Wetland 1

No herb layer



Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--

Acer rubrumQuercus palustris 3

3

Species Name



Total Cover =

----

Fagus grandifolia


--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

Lindera benzoin

--

----

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: -- (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: Surface (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: 1 (in.)



0 2 -- 10YR 3/2 100 -- -- -- -- --2 9 -- 10YR 3/1 97 7.5YR 5/6 3 C M9 20 -- 10YR 3/1 90 7.5YR 6/8 10 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


02/20/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No






Remarks:



Terrace Local Relief: Concave-83.106451

--


PFO

------

Remarks:

--

silty clay loamsilty clay loam

Remarks:

N/A

Wet point for wetland 1

NoYes




of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 15 Y FACW2. 10 Y FACW (A)3. 15 Y FAC4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

40 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. 25 Y FACW UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. 3 N FAC3. 3 N FACW Total 0 (A) 0 (B)4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = NA6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%


1. 20 Y FACW2. -- -- --3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

20


0

Additional Remarks:


sparse herb stratum



Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--

Quercus palustrisCarya laciniosa 5

5

Species Name



Total Cover =

----

Acer negundo


--

Carex grayi

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

Lindera benzoin

Carya laciniosa

--Acer rubrum

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193707055 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: Slope (%): 0 Latitude: 40.22137 Datum: WGS 1984 Community ID: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: N/A Dir: N/ASUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No




SOILS Map Unit Name: PWA -Pewamo silty clay loam, 0-1% slopes


0 18 -- 10YR 2/2 100 -- -- -- -- --18 20 -- 10YR 2/2 15 10YR 6/6 5 C M-- -- -- 10YR 3/2 75 10YR 5/6 5 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


02/20/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


PFO1CPWA -Pewamo silty clay loam, 0-1% slopes NWI/WWI Classification:




Remarks:



Terrace Local Relief: ConcaveLongitude: -83.1073

--


PFO

------

Remarks: Drain present within concave

--


Remarks:

N/A

Drain present in concave, NWI Point

No

Shards of clay throughout

Yes




of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 20 Y FACW2. 15 Y FACU (A)3. 10 Y FAC4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

45 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. 50 Y FACW UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. 10 N FACW3. -- -- -- Total 0 (A) 0 (B)4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = NA6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%


1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

0


0

Additional Remarks:


No herb stratum



Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--

Ulmus americanaCarya ovata 3

4

Species Name



Total Cover =

----

Ulmus americana


--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

75%

--


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

Lindera benzoin

--

--Acer rubrum

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2







0 3 -- 10YR 4/3 98 7.5YR 5/6 2 C M3 8 -- 10YR 4/3 60 7.5YR 5/6 5 C M-- -- -- 10YR 5/1 35 -- -- -- -- --8 12 -- 10YR 5/1 60 7.5YR 5/6 7 C M-- -- -- 10YR 4/3 3 -- -- -- -- --12 20 -- 10YR 5/1 85 7.5YR 5/6 15 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


02/20/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No






Remarks:




clay loam


Upland

clay loamclay loam

--

Remarks:

--

clay loamclay loam

Remarks:

N/A

NWI point, no wetland

NoYes




of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 30 Y FACW2. 5 N FAC (A)3. 35 Y FACW4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

70 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. 15 Y FACU UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total 0 (A) 0 (B)4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = NA6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%


1. 2 N FAC2. 15 Y FACW3. 10 Y FACW4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

27


0

Additional Remarks:




Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--

Quercus palustrisUlmus rubra 4

5

Species Name



Total Cover =

Phalaris arundinacea--

--


--

Toxicodendron radicans

----



--

Multiply by:

80%

--


----

--

Carex grayi

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

Robinia pseudoacacia

--

--Carya laciniosa

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2





SOILS Map Unit Name: Pewamo silty clay loam, 0-1% slopes


0 20 -- 10YR 4/4 100 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A

Used to be agriculture filed, now old field. Upland point for wetland 2.

NoYes



--


Uplands

------

Remarks:

--

----

Remarks:

Yes No

N/APewamo silty clay loam, 0-1% slopes NWI/WWI Classification:




Remarks:



02/20/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No

Wetland Hydrology Present?

of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 60 x 4 = 240

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 40 x 5 = 200



1. 25 Y FACU2. 35 Y FACU3. 40 Y UPL4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

Solidago canadensis

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

0%

--


Total Cover =

Setaria glauca--

--


--

Symphyotrichum ericoides

----

--

---- 0

3

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 0.5 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 4 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: -- (in.)



0 15 -- 10YR 4/2 94 5YR 4/4 6 C M15 20 -- 10YR 3/3 100 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A

Large hole dug or collapsed on south side of wetland, water flowing. Wetland point for Wetland 2

NoYes



--


PEM

------

Remarks: Ice. Large hole dug on south side of wetland, water flowing into it

--

----

Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:



02/20/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0



1. 30 Y OBL2. 65 Y FACW3. 5 N OBL4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

Echinochloa crus-galli

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


Total Cover =

Juncus effusus--

--


--

Typha angustifolia

----

--

---- 2

2

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193707055 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: Slope (%): 0-1 Latitude: 40.22164 Longitude: Datum: WGS 1984 Community ID: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: N/A Dir: N/ASUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No




SOILS Map Unit Name: Bloundt silt loam, ground moraine, 0-2% slopes


0 3 -- 10YR 5/3 100 -- -- -- -- --3 20 -- 10YR 5/3 96 5YR 4/6 4 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A

Upland point for wetland 3

NoYes



--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--

silty clay--

Remarks:

Yes No

N/ABloundt silt loam, ground moraine, 0-2% slopes NWI/WWI Classification:




Remarks:



02/18/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 1 x 3 = 3

FACU spp. 4 x 4 = 16

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 95 x 5 = 475



1. 25 Y UPL2. 70 Y UPL3. 4 N FACU4. 1 N FAC5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

Setaria viridis

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

0%

--


Total Cover =

Symphyotrichum ericoidesXanthium strumarium

--


--

Setaria glauca

----

--

---- 0

2

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193707055 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: Slope (%): 0-1 Latitude: 40.22145 Longitude: Datum: WGS 1984 Community ID: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: N/A Dir: N/ASUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No



Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes No

Depth: 1 (in.)Depth: (in.)

Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: (in.)



0 6 -- 10YR 4/2 90 5YR 4/6 8 C PL-- -- -- -- -- -- 5Y 4/6 2 C M6 10 -- 10YR 5/2 94 7.5YR 5/8 4 C PL-- -- -- -- -- -- 7.5YR 5/8 2 C M10 16 -- 10YR 5/2 95 7.5YR 5/8 5 C M16 20 -- 10YR 6/1 85 7.5YR 5/8 15 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A

Residential house development construction/grading. Wetland point for wetland 3

NoYes



silty clay


PEM


--

Remarks:

--

silty clay loamsilty clay

Remarks:

Yes No

N/ABlount silt loam, ground moraine, 0-2% slopes NWI/WWI Classification:




Remarks:



02/18/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


✔

✔

of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0



1. 10 N OBL2. 35 Y FAC3. 60 Y FACW4. 15 N OBL5. 5 N FACW6 10 N FACW7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

135


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

Juncus tenuis

Tree -

--


--

--

Phalaris arundinacea

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


Total Cover =

Carex vulpinoideaTypha angustifolia

--


--

Epilobium coloratum

----

Agrimonia parviflora

---- 2

2

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2







0 20 -- 10YR 4/3 100 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A

Recent snow melt. Upland point for wetland 4

NoYes



--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--

----

Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:



02/18/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 15 x 3 = 45

FACU spp. 75 x 4 = 300

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 10 x 5 = 50



1. 60 Y FACU2. 15 N FAC3. 10 N UPL4. 15 N FACU5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

Juncus tenuis

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

0%

--


Total Cover =

Daucus carotaSolidago canadensis

--


--

Symphyotrichum pilosum

----

--

---- 0

1

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 1 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: Surface (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: -- (in.)



0 3 -- 10YR 5/2 96 7.5YR 4/6 4 C PL3 7 -- 10YR 4/2 96 7.5YR 4/6 2 C PL-- -- -- -- -- -- 7.5YR 6/4 2 C M7 20 -- 10YR 4/3 47 5YR 3/4 2 C M-- -- -- 10YR 4/2 50 10YR 6/6 1 C PL-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A

PEM sample point of wetland 4

NoYes



silty clay loam


PEM

silty clay loam----

Remarks:

--


Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:



02/18/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0



1. 55 Y FAC2. 5 N FACU3. 35 Y OBL4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

95


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

Symphyotrichum ericoides

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


Total Cover =

Scirpus atrovirens--

--


--

Poa pratensis

----

--

---- 2

2

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 0.5 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 10 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: -- (in.)



0 6 -- 10YR 4/2 100 -- -- -- -- --6 10 -- 10YR 4/2 95 7.5YR 4/6 5 C M10 20 -- 10YR 4/1 94 10YR 6/4 2 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- 5YR 4/4 4 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A

Wetland point PFO community for Wetland 4

NoYes



silty clay loam


PFO

------

Remarks:

--


Remarks:

Yes No

PFO1ABlount silt loam, ground moraine, 2-4% slopes NWI/WWI Classification:




Remarks:



02/18/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 40 Y FACW2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

40 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0



1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

0


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


Total Cover =

----

--


--

--

----

--

Quercus palustris-- 1

1

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

No shrubs/saplings, herb rooted in

--



Total Cover =


of 2







0 11 -- 10YR 4/2 100 -- -- -- -- --11 14 -- 10YR 5/1 97 10YR 5/6 3 C M14 20 -- 10YR 6/1 90 10YR 5/8 10 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


02/18/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No




loamColor (Moist)


Remarks:




--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--


Remarks:

N/A

Upland point for Wetland 4 PFO community

NoYes




of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 15 N FAC2. 40 Y FACW (A)3. 7 N FAC4. 18 Y FAC (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

80 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. 10 Y FACU UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. 5 Y FAC3. -- -- -- Total 0 (A) 0 (B)4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = NA6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%


1. 2 N FACU2. 5 Y FAC3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

7


0

Additional Remarks:




Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--

Ulmus rubraQuercus palustris 4

5

Species Name



Total Cover =

----

Ulmus rubra


--

Rosa multiflora

----



--

Multiply by:

80%

--


----

--


Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

Lonicera morrowii

--

Acer rubrumCeltis occidentalis

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2







0 3 -- 10YR 3/2 97 7.5YR 4/6 3 C PL3 20 -- 10YR 4/3 100 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


02/18/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


PFO1A, 2- % slopes NWI/WWI Classification:




Remarks:




--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--

silty clay loam--

Remarks:

N/A

Stream flows through, NWI area

NoYes




of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 20 Y FAC2. 10 Y FACW (A)3. 5 N FACU4. 5 N FAC (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

40 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0




10

1. 15 Y FACU2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No4. -- -- --5. -- -- --

15

Additional Remarks:




Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--


4

Species Name



Total Cover =

----

--


--


----



--

Multiply by:

75%

--


Rosa multiflora--

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

Acer rubrumAesculus flava

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: -- (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 6 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: -- (in.)



0 3 -- 10YR 3/3 100 -- -- -- -- --3 5 -- 10YR 5/3 100 -- -- -- -- --5 10 -- 10YR 5/4 100 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


02/18/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No




silt loamColor (Moist)


Remarks:

Type: Roots Depth: 10" Hydric Soil Present?


Terrace Local Relief: Convex-83.121831

--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--

silt loamsilt loam

Remarks:

N/A


NoYes




of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 40 Y FAC2. 5 N FACW (A)3. 5 N FACW4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

50 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0



1. 10 Y FAC2. 2 N FACU3. 5 Y FACU4. 2 N FAC5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

19


0

Additional Remarks:




Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--

Acer rubrumUlmus americana 2

3

Species Name



Total Cover =

Fagus grandifoliaAcer rubrum

--


--


----



--

Multiply by:

67%

--


----

--

Rosa multiflora

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

--Quercus palustris

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 0.5 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: surface (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: -- (in.)



0 5 -- 10YR 4/3 100 -- -- -- -- --5 18 -- 10YR 6/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A

Wet point for Wetland 5

NoYes



--


PFO

------

Remarks:

--

silty clay loam--

Remarks:

Yes No



loamColor (Moist)


Remarks:

Type: Roots/Clay Depth: 18" Hydric Soil Present?


02/18/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


✔

of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 40 Y FAC2. 5 N FACW (A)3. 15 Y FACW4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

60 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0



1. 2 FACU2. 2 FAC3. 2 OBL4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

6


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--


Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

--Quercus palustris



--

Multiply by:

%

--


Total Cover =

Carex frankii--

--


--

Lonicera morrowii

----

--

Acer rubrumUlmus americana

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193707055 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: Slope (%): Datum: -- Community ID: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: N/A Dir: N/ASUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No



Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 1 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 0 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: 0 (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Blount silt loam. ground moraine 0-2% slopes


0 7 -- 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 5/8 5 C M7 20 -- 2.5Y 4/1 95 7.5YR 5/8 5 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


04/21/20




Yes No


N/ABlount silt loam. ground moraine 0-2% slopes NWI/WWI Classification:




Remarks:

Type: N/A Depth: -- Hydric Soil Present?


Local Relief: Concave1 Latitude: Longitude: -

--


PEM

------

Remarks:

--

clay loam--

Remarks:

N/A


NoYes


N - Alternate Route Columbia Gas of OhioMichelle earns Julie Slater

UnionOhioWetland 6SP18

of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0




60


0

Additional Remarks:

N - Alternate Route Wetland 6



Total Cover =

----

--

40% open ground/water

--



Total Cover =


--

---- 1

1

Species Name



Total Cover =

----

--


--


----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2





SOILS Map Unit Name: Blount silt loam. ground moraine 0-2% slopes


0 6 -- 10YR 4/4 100 -- -- -- -- --6 14 -- 10YR 4/4 95 7.5YR 4/6 5 C M14 20 -- 10YR 4/4 93 10YR 5/8 7 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


04/21/20




Yes No


N/ANWI/WWI Classification:




Remarks:



Blount silt loam. ground moraine 0-2% slopesHillslope2 Latitude:

Local Relief: ConcaveLongitude:

--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--

clay loam--

Remarks:

N/A

Mown powerline ROW. Upland point for Wetland 6

NoYes


N - Alternate RouteColumbia Gas of OhioMichelle earns Julie Slater


of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 15 x 3 = 45

FACU spp. 80 x 4 = 320

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0



1. 50 Y FACU2. 5 N FACU3. 5 N FACU4. 15 N FAC5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

75

1. 10 Y FACU2. 10 Y FACU3. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present Yes No4. -- -- --5. -- -- --

20

Additional Remarks:




Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--

---- 0

3

Species Name



Total Cover =

Dipsacus fullonumViola sororia

--


--

Solidago canadensis

----



--

Multiply by:

0%

--


Rubus idaeusLonicera japonica

--

Taraxacum officinale

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2







0 9 -- 10YR 4/2 95 7.5YR 6/8 5 C M9 20 -- 10YR 4/2 85 7.5YR 6/8 15 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --



Charlie AllenDelawareOhioWetland SP

N/A

Wet point for Wetland

NoYes



--


PFO

------

Remarks:

--

clay loam--

Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:



02/11/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2

Project/Site: Wetland ID: SP


% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 30 Y FAC2. 40 Y FACW (A)3. 5 N FACU4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

75 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. 15 Y FAC UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. 5 N FACU3. 20 Y FACU Total 0 (A) 0 (B)4. 5 N FACU5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = NA6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%


1. 20 Y FACU2. -- -- --3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

20


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

Ulmus rubra

Lonicera morrowii

--Aesculus flava



Aesculus flava

Multiply by:

60%

--


Total Cover =

----

Vitis labrusca


--

Lonicera morrowii

----

--


5

Species Name



NCL - alternate route Wetland



Total Cover =

----

--

80% open ground for herb layer

--



Total Cover =


of 2







0 12 -- 10YR 4/2 100 -- -- -- -- --12 20 -- 10YR 5/3 33 10YR 5/6 40 C M-- -- -- 10YR 6/2 25 7.5YR 4/6 2 C PL-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --



Charlie AllenDelawareOhioWetland SP

N/A

Upland point for Wetland

NoYes



--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--


Remarks:

Yes No



loamColor (Moist)


Remarks:



02/18/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 10 Y FAC2. 35 Y FACW (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

45 FACW spp. 35 x 2 = 70

FAC spp. 10 x 3 = 30

FACU spp. 5 x 4 = 20

1. 60 Y FACU UPL spp. 60 x 5 = 300



1. 5 Y FACU2. -- -- --3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

5


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

Lonicera morrowii

--

----



--

Multiply by:

50%

--


Total Cover =

----

--


--

Lonicera japonica

----

--


4

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 4 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: Surface (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: 2 (in.)



0 6 -- 10YR 4/2 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C PL6 8 -- 5Y 4/1 93 7.5YR 4/6 7 C PL8 15 -- 5Y 5/2 100 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --



Charlie AllenUnionOhioWetland SP2

N/A

Channelized stream through farm fields. Wet point for wetland

NoYes


Floodplain Local Relief: Concave-83.189061

--


PEM

------

Remarks:

--

loamloam

Remarks:

Yes No



loamColor (Moist)


Remarks:



01/31/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0




100


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


Total Cover =

----

--


--


----

--

---- 1

1

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2







0 20 -- 10YR 3/2 100 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A


NoYes


Talf Local Relief: None-83.189069

--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--

----

Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:



01/31/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2




0 FACW spp. 45 x 2 = 90

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 30 x 4 = 120

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 25 x 5 = 125



1. 25 Y UPL2. 45 Y FACW3. 20 Y FACU4. 10 N FACU5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--


Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

33%

--


Total Cover =

Solidago canadensisGlechoma hederacea

--


--

Setaria viridis

----

--

---- 1

3

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2







0 16 -- 10YR 4/3 100 -- -- -- -- --16 20 -- 10YR 4/3 98 10YR 5/6 2 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A

Mowed vegetation. Upland point for Wetland

NoYes



--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--

silty clay loam--

Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:



01/31/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 35 x 3 = 105

FACU spp. 30 x 4 = 120

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 25 x 5 = 125



1. 25 Y UPL2. 25 Y FACU3. 35 Y FAC4. 5 N FACU5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

90


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

Setaria faberi

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

33%

--


Total Cover =

Poa pratensisTrifolium repens

--


--

Setaria viridis

----

--

---- 1

3

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

10% open ground

--



Total Cover =


of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193707055 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: Slope (%): 0 Latitude: 40.196123 Longitude: Datum: WGS 1984 Community ID: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: Dir: N/ASUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No



Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 0.5 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: Surface (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: 6 (in.)



0 6 -- 10YR 3/2 100 -- -- -- -- --6 14 -- 10YR 4/1 85 10YR 5/8 2 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- 5YR 4/6 10 C PL-- -- -- -- -- -- 5YR 4/6 3 C M14 20 -- 10YR 4/1 87 10YR 5/8 3 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- 5YR 4/6 5 C PL-- -- -- -- -- -- 10YR 4/6 5 C PL-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


Angela Sjollema




Yes No






Remarks:



Floodplain/ditch Local Relief: Concave-83.196216

silty clay loam


silty clay loamsilty clay loamsilty clay loam

Remarks:

--


Remarks:

N/A

Wet point for wetland

NoYes



Charlie Allen

01/31/20UnionOhioWetlandSP2PEMN/AN/AN/An Noooooooo

YY

A

Y NYY

Y N

A

FF

F

n , , o sn , , o

YYY

N N N

AABBBBBBB

BBBCCCCCDO

BB

NN

ASF

t

AAAAAAAAA

)

CCCDDD

F

SSSF

AA

ASSSS

NNYY

Y

TO

of 2


VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius)


0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0


0 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *


100


0

Additional Remarks:


* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must bepresent, unless disturbed or problematic.


Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--

---- 1

1

Species Name



Total Cover =

----

--


--


----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


----

--

--

Tree -

--

Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft. tall.

--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--

--Total % Cover of:

------

--

------


Y NYYY

N N N

NoY

Y N

of 2







0 20 -- 10YR 3/3 100 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


01/30/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No






Remarks:



Terrace Local Relief:-83.222857

--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--

----

Remarks:

N/A

Mowed Vegetation, Upland point for Wetland

NoYes



Julie SlaterUnionOhioWetland SP2

of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total (A) (B)4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A =6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%



100


0

Additional Remarks:




Total Cover =

----

--

Mowed vegetation

--



Total Cover =


--

---- 1

1

Species Name



Total Cover =

----

--


--


----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2







0 3 -- 10YR 4/3 100 -- -- -- -- --3 21 -- 5Y 3/1 90 7.5YR 5/8 7 C PL-- -- -- -- -- -- 7.5YR 5/8 3 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A

Old agriculture ditch, narrow between row crop fields. Wet point fo wetland .

NoYes


Toeslope Local Relief: Concave-83.222897

--


PEM

------

Remarks:

--

sandy loamsandy loam

Remarks:

Yes No



sandy loamColor (Moist)


Remarks:



01/30/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


✔

of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0



1. 95 Y FACW2. 5 N OBL3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

Typha latifolia

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


Total Cover =

----

--


--


----

--

---- 1

1

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2





SOILS Map Unit Name: Blount silt loam, end moraine, 2-4% slopes


0 16 -- 10YR 3/2 100 -- -- -- -- --16 20 -- 10YR 3/2 96 10YR 5/6 3 C M16 20 -- -- -- -- 7.5YR 4/6 1 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


01/30/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


N/ABlount silt loam, end moraine, 2-4% slopes NWI/WWI Classification:




Remarks:




--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--


Remarks:

N/A


NoYes



Julie SlaterUnionOhioWetland 1SP2

of 2




0 FACW spp. 75 x 2 = 150

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 27 x 4 = 108

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0



1. 75 Y FACW2. 5 N FACU3. 2 N FACU4. 20 Y FACU5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

102


0

Additional Remarks:




Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--

---- 1

2

Species Name



Total Cover =

Asclepias syriacaSolidago canadensis

--


--


----



--

Multiply by:

50%

--


----

--

Dipsacus fullonum

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 1.5 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: -- (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: -- (in.)



0 4 -- 10YR 4/2 95 5YR 5/8 5 C M4 21 -- 10YR 4/1 95 5YR 5/8 5 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


01/30/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No






Remarks:




--


PEM

------

Remarks:

--

clay loam--

Remarks:

N/A

Wetland point for Wetland 1

NoYes




of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0



1. 80 Y FACW2. 15 N OBL3. 5 N FAC4. 10 N OBL5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

110


0

Additional Remarks:




Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--

---- 1

1

Species Name



Total Cover =

Xanthium strumariumLeersia oryzoides

--


--


----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


----

--

Typha angustifolia

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193707055 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: Slope (%): 0 Latitude: 40.1662 Longitude: Datum: WGS 1984 Community ID: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: N/A Dir: N/ASUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No






0 11 -- 10YR 4/3 100 -- -- -- -- --11 20 -- 10YR 4/4 85 10YR 5/6 15 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --



Julie Slater

N/A


NoYes



--


------

Remarks:

--

clay--

Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:



01/30/20UnionOhioWetland 1SPUplandN/AN/A

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


n Nooo

YY

A

Y NYY

YNN

N

A

FF

F

n , , o sn , , o

YYY

N N N

AABBBBBBB

BBBCCCCCDO

BB

NN

ASF

t

AAAAAAAAA

CCCDDD

F

SSSF

AA

ASSSS

NNYY

Y

TO

of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. -- -- --2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. x 1 = 0

0 FACW spp. x 2 = 0

FAC spp. x 3 = 0

FACU spp. x 4 = 0

1. 60 Y FACW UPL spp. x 5 = 0

2. -- -- --3. -- -- -- Total (A) 0 (B)4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = NA6. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%

60 Yes NoYes NoYes No

1. 15 FACU2. 30 Y FACU3. 55 Y FACW4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

Solidago canadensis

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

Cornus amomum

--

----



--

Multiply by:

67%

--


Total Cover =

Phalaris arundinacea--

--


--

Dipsacus fullonum

----

--

---- 2

3

Species Name




present, unless disturbed or problematic.


Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


Y NYYY

N N N

NoY

Y N

of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193707055 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: Slope (%): 0 Latitude: 40.1659 Longitude: Datum: WGS1984 Community ID: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: N/A Dir: N/ASUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No






0 6 -- 10YR 4/2 94 5YR 5/8 6 C PL6 10 -- 10YR 4/1 90 5YR 4/6 7 C PL-- -- -- -- -- -- 5YR 4/6 3 C M10 16 -- 5Y 4/1 85 5YR 4/6 10 C PL-- -- -- -- -- -- 5YR 4/6 5 C M16 20 -- 5Y 4/1 95 5YR 4/6 5 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


NCL - alternate routeColumbis Gas of Ohio

Julie SlaterUnionOhioWetland 1SP

N/A


NoYes


Floodplain Local Relief: Concave-83.226793

silty clay loam


PEM


--

Remarks:

--

silt loamsilt loam

Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:



01/30/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


✔

of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0



1. 50 Y FACW2. 30 Y OBL3. 30 Y FACW4. 5 N FACU5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

115


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

Leersia oryzoides

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


Total Cover =

Solidago giganteaAsclepias syriaca

--


--


----

--

---- 3

3

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193707055 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: Slope (%): Longitude: Datum: WGS 1984 Community ID: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: N/A Dir: N/ASUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No






0 10 -- 10YR 3/3 95 10YR 3/4 5 C PL10 20 -- 10YR 4/1 80 7.5YR 5/8 20 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


04/27/20




Yes No






Remarks:



Blount silt loam, end moraine, 2-4% slopesDitch0 Latitude:

Local Relief: Concave

--


PEM

------

Remarks:

--

silty clay--

Remarks:

N/A

Road side ditch, wet point for Wetland 13

NoYes


N - Alternate Routeolumbia Gas of Ohio

Angela Sjollema Julie SlaterUnionOhioWetland 13SP32

✔

of 2




0 FACW spp. x 2 = 0

FAC spp. x 3 = 0

FACU spp. x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. x 5 = 0



1. 40 Y FACW2. 60 Y OBL3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100


0

Additional Remarks:




Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--

---- 2

2

Species Name



Total Cover =

----

--


--


----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


----

--

Typha latifolia

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193707055 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: Slope (%): Datum: WGS 1984 Community ID: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: N/A Dir: N/ASUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No






0 6 -- 10YR 2/2 100 -- -- -- -- --6 10 -- 10YR 3/2 80 -- -- -- -- --6 10 -- 7.5YR 4/2 20 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --



N/A


NoYes


Local Relief: NoneLongitude:

--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--

silty clay--

Remarks:

Yes No

N/ABlount silt loam, end moraine, 2-4% slopesHillslope2 Latitude:

NWI/WWI Classification:




Remarks:

Type: Gravel/Rock Depth: 10" Hydric Soil Present?


04/27/20N - Alternate RouteColumbia Gas of OhioAngela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2




0 FACW spp. x 2 = 0

FAC spp. x 3 = 0

FACU spp. x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. x 5 = 0



1. 75 Y FAC2. 8 N UPL3. 15 N FACW4. 2 N FACU5. 2 N FACU6 -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

102


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

Daucus carota

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


Total Cover =

Phalaris arundinaceaTaraxacum officinale

--


--

Poa pratensis

----

Dipsacus fullonum

---- 1

1

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2

Project/Site: Stantec Project #: 193707055 Date: Applicant: County: Investigator #1: Investigator #2: State: Soil Unit: Wetland ID: Landform: Sample Point: Slope (%): 2 Latitude: 40.1568 Longitude: Datum: -- Community ID: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in remarks) Section: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Township: N/A Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? Range: N/A Dir: N/ASUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is This Sampling Point Within A Wetland? Yes No






0 8 -- 10YR 4/4 100 -- -- -- -- --8 14 -- 10YR 5/4 93 10YR 5/8 4 C M8 14 -- -- -- -- 10YR 6/2 3 C M14 21 -- 10YR 3/3 30 10YR 5/8 2 C M14 21 -- 10YR 6/4 68 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


NCL - alternate routeColumbis Gas of Ohio

Julie SlaterUnionOhioN/ASP

N/A

NWI Point confirmed to be Upland

NoYes



silty clay


Upland

silty clay----

Remarks:

--


Remarks:

Yes No

PFO1CBlount silt loam, end moraine, 0-2% slopes NWI/WWI Classification:


loamColor (Moist)


Remarks:



01/14/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 8 N FACU2. 15 Y FACU (A)3. 20 Y FAC4. 10 N FAC (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

53 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 35 x 3 = 105

FACU spp. 60 x 4 = 240

1. 20 Y FACU UPL spp. 3 x 5 = 15

2. 12 Y FACU3. 5 N FACU Total 98 (A) 360 (B)4. 3 N UPL5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.6736. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%


1. 5 Y FAC2. -- -- --3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

5


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

Lonicera morrowii

Carya ovata

Celtis occidentalisUlmus rubra



Rubus occidentalis

Multiply by:

40%

--


Total Cover =

----

Rubus allegheniensis


--


----

--

Fraxinus americanaAcer saccharum 2

5

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2







0 3 -- 10YR 3/2 85 7.5YR 5/8 15 C M3 17 -- 10YR 5/1 55 10YR 5/8 45 C M17 21 -- 10YR 5/1 30 10YR 5/8 70 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A

Wetland point to Wetland 1

NoYes


Depression Local Relief: Concave-83.222392

--


PEM

------

Remarks: Buttressed trees

--

clayclay

Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:



01/14/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 45 Y FACW2. 10 N FACW (A)3. 20 Y FACW4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

75 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0



1. -- -- --2. -- -- --3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

0


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

--Ulmus americana



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


Total Cover =

----

--


--

--

----

--

Quercus palustrisCarya ovata 2

2

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2







0 5 -- 10YR 4/3 70 -- -- -- -- --0 5 -- 10YR 5/2 30 -- -- -- -- --5 18 -- 2.5Y 6/2 50 10YR 6/6 50 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A

Upland point to Wetland 1

No

Roots, not able to sample below 18-inches

Yes



--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--


Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:



01/14/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 35 Y FACU2. 5 N FACW (A)3. 5 N FACU4. 20 Y FACU (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

65 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 10 x 3 = 30

FACU spp. 140 x 4 = 560

1. 5 Y FACU UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. 5 Y FAC3. 10 Y FACU Total 150 (A) 590 (B)4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.9336. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%



10


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

Carya ovata

Acer saccharum

Carya ovataAcer saccharum



--

Multiply by:

33%

--


Total Cover =

----

Celtis occidentalis


--


----

--

Quercus rubraLiriodendron tulipifera 2

6

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 1 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: Surface (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: Surface (in.)

SOILS Map Unit Name: Wetzel silty clay loam


0 5 -- 10YR 4/2 100 -- -- -- -- --5 20 -- 10YR 4/2 68 7.5YR 4/6 30 C M5 20 -- -- -- -- 7.5YR 5/8 2 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A

Stream S turns into Wetland 1 , then drains to broken tile and goes below surface

NoYes



--


PEM

------

Remarks:

--


Remarks:

Yes No

N/AWetzel silty clay loam NWI/WWI Classification:




Remarks:



01/15/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0



1. 20 Y OBL2. 80 Y FACW3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--


Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


Total Cover =

----

--


--

Typha angustifolia

----

--

---- 2

2

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2





SOILS Map Unit Name: Wetzel silty clay loam


0 13 -- 10YR 4/3 100 -- -- -- -- --13 16 -- 10YR 4/2 40 7.5YR 4/6 20 C M13 16 -- -- 3/N 40 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


01/15/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


N/AWetzel silty clay loam NWI/WWI Classification:




Remarks:

Type: Clay Depth: 16" Hydric Soil Present?



--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--


Remarks:

N/A

Upland point for wetland 1

NoYes




of 2




0 FACW spp. 20 x 2 = 40

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 85 x 4 = 340

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0



1. 70 Y FACU2. 20 N FACW3. 15 N FACU4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

105


0

Additional Remarks:




Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--

---- 0

1

Species Name



Total Cover =

Solidago canadensis--

--


--

Dipsacus fullonum

----



--

Multiply by:

0%

--


----

--


Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2





SOILS Map Unit Name: Blount silt loam. end moraine 2-4% slopes


0 7 -- 10YR 4/2 95 5YR 4/6 5 C PL7 10 -- 5Y 5/1 95 10YR 5/8 5 C M10 20 -- 10YR 4/2 93 10YR 5/8 7 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --



N/A


NoYes



--


PEM

------

Remarks:

--

----

Remarks:

Yes No

N/ABlount silt loam. end moraine 2-4% slopesToeslope0 Latitude:

NWI/WWI Classification:




Remarks:



04/21/20N - Alternate RouteColumbia Gas of OhioMichelle earns




Yes No


of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0



1. 95 Y OBL2. -- -- --3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

95


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


Total Cover =

----

--


--

Typha angustifolia

----

--

---- 1

1

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

5% open water

--



Total Cover =


of 2







0 8 -- 10YR 3/3 100 -- -- -- -- --8 18 -- 10YR 3/2 95 7.5YR 5/8 5 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


04/21/20




Yes No






Remarks:



Blount silt loam. end moraine 2-4% slopesToeslope0 Latitude:


--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--

clay loam--

Remarks:

N/A


NoYes




of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0



1. 90 Y FAC2. 5 N UPL3. 3 N FAC4. 2 N FACU5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100


0

Additional Remarks:




Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--

---- 1

1

Species Name



Total Cover =

Plantago majorTaraxacum officinale

--


--

Poa pratensis

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


----

--

Daucus carota

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 0.5 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 0 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: 0 (in.)



0 7 -- 10YR 4/2 90 10YR 5/8 7 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- 5YR 4/6 3 C PL7 15 -- 10YR 5/2 95 10YR 5/6 5 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


04/21/20




Yes No






Remarks:

Type: Roots Depth: 15" Hydric Soil Present?


Blount silt loam. end moraine 0-2% slopesToeslope1 Latitude:


--


PEM

------

Remarks:

--

clay loamclay loam

Remarks:

N/A


NoYes




of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0




95


0

Additional Remarks:




Total Cover =

----

--

5% open water/ground

--



Total Cover =


--

---- 1

1

Species Name



Total Cover =

----

--


--

Typha angustifolia

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2







0 20 -- 10YR 4/2 97 10YR 5/8 3 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


04/21/20




Yes No






Remarks:



Blount silt loam. end moraine 0-2% slopesHillslope0 Latitude:

Local Relief: ConvexLongitude:

--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--

----

Remarks:

N/A


NoYes




of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0



1. 90 Y FAC2. 2 N FAC3. 3 N FACU4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

95


0

Additional Remarks:




Total Cover =

----

--

5% bare ground

--



Total Cover =


--

---- 1

1

Species Name



Total Cover =

Plantago lanceolata--

--


--

Poa pratensis

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


----

--

Plantago major

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 0.5 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 7 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: Surface (in.)



0 4 -- 10YR 4/3 86 5YR 4/6 10 C M0 4 -- -- -- -- 5YR 4/6 4 C PL4 6 -- 10YR 4/3 60 -- -- -- -- --6 14 -- 5YR 5/1 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M14 18 -- 5Y 5/1 30 10YR 5/6 20 C M14 18 -- -- 5/N 40 10YR 5/6 10 C PL18 21 -- 5Y 5/1 30 10YR 5/6 30 C M18 21 -- -- 5/N 40 -- -- -- -- --


01/15/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No






Remarks:




silty clay


PEM

silty claysilty claysilty clay

Remarks:

silty clay

silt loam40% gravel

Remarks:

N/A

Ditch alongside U -33, Mowed vegetation. Wetland Point for wetland 1

NoYes




of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 20 Y FAC2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

20 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0




100


0

Additional Remarks:




Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--

Populus deltoides-- 2

2

Species Name



Total Cover =

----

--


--

Typha angustifolia

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2







0 4 -- 10YR 4/3 100 -- -- -- -- --4 7 -- 10YR 4/3 55 10YR 5/6 45 C M7 21 -- 10YR 3/2 20 10YR 5/8 55 C M7 21 -- 10YR 4/2 25 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


01/15/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No




loamColor (Moist)


Remarks:

Type: N/a Depth: N/A Hydric Soil Present?


Hillslope Local Relief: None-83.209745

silty clay


Upland

------

Remarks:

--


Remarks:

N/A

Vegetation mowed. upland point for wetland 1

NoYes




of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 50 x 3 = 150

FACU spp. 45 x 4 = 180

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 5 x 5 = 25



1. 30 Y FACU2. 15 N FACU3. 50 Y FAC4. 5 N UPL5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100


0

Additional Remarks:




Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--

---- 1

2

Species Name



Total Cover =

Poa pratensisDaucus carota

--


--

Dipsacus fullonum

----



--

Multiply by:

50%

--


----

--

Plantago lanceolata

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 1 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: -- (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: -- (in.)



0 4 -- 10YR 3/1 96 7.5YR 5/8 2 C M0 4 -- -- -- -- 5YR 5/8 2 C PL4 18 -- 10YR 5/1 40 10YR 5/6 60 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A

Vegetation mowed. Wetland point for wetland 1

NoYes



--


PEM

------

Remarks:

--

silt loamsilty clay

Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:

Type: Clay Depth: 18 Hydric Soil Present?


01/15/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0




50


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


Total Cover =

----

--


--

Typha angustifolia

----

--

---- 1

1

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

50% open water/ dead detritus

--



Total Cover =


of 2







0 3 -- 10YR 2/2 100 -- -- -- -- --3 6 -- 10YR 3/2 100 -- -- -- -- --6 12 -- 10YR 4/2 69 10YR 4/6 30 C M6 12 -- -- -- -- 7.5YR 4/6 1 C M12 18 -- 10YR 4/2 47 10YR 4/6 3 C M12 18 -- -- -- -- 10YR 5/8 50 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A

Vegetation mowed. upland point for wetland 1

NoYes



silty clay


Upland


--

Remarks:

--

silty clay loamsilty clay

Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:



01/15/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 5 Y FAC2. 5 Y UPL (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

10 FACW spp. 10 x 2 = 20

FAC spp. 95 x 3 = 285

FACU spp. 10 x 4 = 40

1. 10 Y UPL UPL spp. 15 x 5 = 75

2. 10 Y FACU3. -- -- -- Total 130 (A) 420 (B)4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.2316. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%


1. 90 Y FAC2. 10 N FACW3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

Cyperus strigosus

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

Acer ginnala

--

----



--

Multiply by:

40%

--


Total Cover =

----

Lonicera morrowii


--

Poa pratensis

----

--

Morus albaPinus nigra 2

5

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 3 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 2 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: -- (in.)



0 7 -- 10YR 4/3 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C M7 21 -- 10YR 4/2 75 7.5YR 4/6 25 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A

Wetland point for Wetland

NoYes



--


PEM

------

Remarks:

--

silty clay loam--

Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:



01/15/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 0 x 3 = 0

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0




100


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


Total Cover =

----

--


--

Typha angustifolia

----

--

---- 1

1

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2







0 10 -- 10YR 3/3 100 -- -- -- -- --10 17 -- 10YR 3/4 100 -- -- -- -- --17 21 -- 10YR 4/4 100 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A


NoYes



--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--


Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:



01/15/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2




15 FACW spp. 3 x 2 = 6

FAC spp. 45 x 3 = 135

FACU spp. 31 x 4 = 124

1. 20 Y UPL UPL spp. 30 x 5 = 150

2. 20 Y FACU3. 10 Y UPL Total 109 (A) 415 (B)4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.8076. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%


1. 1 N FACU2. 3 N FACW3. 10 Y FACU4. 30 Y FAC5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

44


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

Cyperus strigosus

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

Malus coronaria

Acer ginnala

----



--

Multiply by:

33%

--


Total Cover =

Solidago canadensisPoa pratensis

Lonicera morrowii


--

Allium canadense

----

--

Morus alba-- 2

6

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

6% open ground

--



Total Cover =


of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 1" (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: surface (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: surface (in.)



0 17 1 10YR 4/2 92 5YR 5/8 8 C PL17 20 2 10YR 4/2 87 5YR 5/8 8 C PL17 20 2 -- -- -- 5YR 5/8 5 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


NCL-alternate routeColumbia Gas of Ohio


N/A


NoYes



--


PEM

------

Remarks:

--


Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:



01/16/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2




0 FACW spp. x 2 = 0

FAC spp. x 3 = 0

FACU spp. x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. x 5 = 0




100


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


Total Cover =

----

--


--


----

--

---- 1

1

Species Name



NCL-alternate route Wetland



Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: - (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: - (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: - (in.)



0 10 1 10YR 5/3 93 7.5YR 4/6 2 C M0 10 1 -- -- -- 10YR 5/8 5 C M10 14 2 10YR 4/4 15 7.5YR 5/6 25 C M10 14 2 10YR 4/2 60 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --



Julie SlaterUnionOhioWetland SP

N/A


NoYes


Talf Local Relief: Linear-83.20007

--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--

clayclay

Remarks:

Yes No



clayColor (Moist)


Remarks:



01/16/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2



% Cover Dominant Ind.Status Dominance Test Worksheet1. 40 Y FACU2. -- -- -- (A)3. -- -- --4. -- -- -- (B)5. -- -- --6. -- -- -- (A/B)7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Prevalence Index Worksheet9. -- -- --10. -- -- -- OBL spp. 0 x 1 = 0

40 FACW spp. 20 x 2 = 40

FAC spp. 25 x 3 = 75

FACU spp. 40 x 4 = 160

1. 30 Y UPL UPL spp. 50 x 5 = 250

2. 10 Y UPL3. -- -- -- Total 135 (A) 525 (B)4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.8896. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%


1. 25 Y FAC2. 20 Y FACW3. 10 N UPL4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

55


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--


Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

Elaeagnus umbellata

--

----



--

Multiply by:

40%

--


Total Cover =

Pyrus calleryana--

Pyrus calleryana


--

Poa pratensis

----

--

Quercus rubra-- 2

5

Species Name






Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2







0 5 1 10YR 4/3 9 10YR 4/6 2 C M0 5 1 -- -- -- 5YR 4/6 1 C PL-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


Angela Sjollema




Yes No






Remarks:

Type: Rock Depth: 5" Hydric Soil Present?


Footslope Local Relief: Linear-83.198822

--


------

Remarks:

--

silty clay loam--

Remarks:

N/A

Vegetation mowed, upland point for Wetland

NoYes



Julie Slater

01/16/20UnionOhioWetland SPUplandN/AN/A

n Nooo

YY

A

Y NYY

YNN

N

A

FF

F

n , , o sn , , o

YYY

N N N

AABBBBBBB

BBBCCCCCDO

BB

NN

ASF

t

AAAAAAAAA

CCCDDD

F

SSSF

AA

ASSSS

NNYY

Y

TO

of 2




0 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 100 x 3 = 300

FACU spp. 0 x 4 = 0

1. 5 Y UPL UPL spp. 5 x 5 = 25


5 Yes NoYes NoYes No


100


0

Additional Remarks:


present, unless disturbed or problematic.


Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


--

---- 1

2

Species Name



Total Cover =

----

--


--

Poa pratensis

----



--

Multiply by:

50%

--


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

Pyrus calleryana

--

----

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


Y NYYY

N N N

NoY

Y N

of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: 1 (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: surface (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: surface (in.)



0 7 1 10YR 4/2 99 5YR 5/8 1 C M7 20 2 10YR 4/2 94 5YR 5/8 6 C PL-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --



Julie Slater

N/A


NoYes



--


------

Remarks:

--

silty clay--

Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:



01/16/20UnionOhioWetlandSPPEMN/AN/A

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


n Noooooooo

YY

A

Y NYY

Y N

A

FF

F

n , , o sn , , o

YYY

N N N

AABBBBBBB

BBBCCCCCDO

BB

NN

ASF

t

AAAAAAAAA

)

CCCDDD

F

SSSF

AA

ASSSS

NNYY

Y

TO

of 2


VEGETATION (Species identified in all uppercase are non native species.) Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius)


0 FACW spp. x 2 = 0

FAC spp. x 3 = 0

FACU spp. x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. x 5 = 0


0 Yes No Prevalence Index is ≤ 3.0 *Yes No Morphological Adaptations (Explain) *Yes No Problem Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) *

1. 15 N OBL2. 90 Y OBL3. -- -- --4. -- -- --5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

105


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--

--Total % Cover of:

------

--

------


----

--

Scirpus atrovirens

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


Total Cover =

----

--


--

Typha angustifolia

----

--

---- 1

1

Species Name




* Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must bepresent, unless disturbed or problematic.


Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


Y NYYY

N N N

NoY

Y N

of 2




Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth: - (in.) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth: 2 (in.) Saturation Present? Yes No Depth: 0 (in.)



0 6 1 10YR 4/2 95 7.5YR 4/6 5 C PL6 20 2 10YR 4/2 100 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A


NoYes



--


PEM

------

Remarks:

--

silty clay--

Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:



01/16/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2




0 FACW spp. x 2 = 0

FAC spp. x 3 = 0

FACU spp. x 4 = 0

1. -- -- -- UPL spp. x 5 = 0



1. 30 Y OBL2. 50 Y FACW3. 15 N OBL4. 5 N FACW5. -- -- --6 -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- --9. -- -- -- Sapling/Shrub -10. -- -- --11. -- -- --12. -- -- --13. -- -- --14. -- -- --15. -- -- --

100


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--


Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

--

--

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


Total Cover =

Scirpus cyperinusSymphyotrichum lateriflorum

--


--

Typha angustifolia

----

--

---- 2

2

Species Name



NCL-alternate route Wetland 2



Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2







0 7 1 10YR 4/3 99 10YR 5/8 1 C M7 12 2 10YR 5/3 90 10YR 5/8 10 C M-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




N/A

Vegetation is mowed, upland point for Wetland 2

No

Soil is mostly fill material

Yes



--


Upland

------

Remarks:

--

silty clay--

Remarks:

Yes No





Remarks:



01/16/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2




12 FACW spp. 0 x 2 = 0

FAC spp. 112 x 3 = 336

FACU spp. 25 x 4 = 100

1. 10 Y FACU UPL spp. 0 x 5 = 0

2. 15 Y FACU3. -- -- -- Total 137 (A) 436 (B)4. -- -- --5. -- -- -- Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.1826. -- -- --7. -- -- --8. -- -- -- Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:9. -- -- -- Yes No Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation10. -- -- -- Yes No Dominance Test is > 50%



100


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

Robinia pseudoacacia

--

----



--

Multiply by:

50%

--


Total Cover =

----

Acer saccharum


--

Poa pratensis

----

--

Celtis occidentalis-- 2

4

Species Name



NCL-alternate route Wetland 2



Total Cover =

----

--

--



Total Cover =


of 2







0 8 1 2.5Y 5/1 60 -- -- -- -- --0 8 1 5Y 5/2 40 -- -- -- -- --8 18 2 10YR 4/4 70 -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --



Julie SlaterUnionOhioN/ASP

N/A

Water treated with herbicide, soil is fill material, site is a manmade pond that has been drained to build a deck. Under normal circumstances, this would be a pond with no vegetation

No

Horizon 2 was 30% channery/gravel

Yes



--


Upland

------

Remarks: water was intentionally dropped to install a deck

--


Remarks:

Yes No

PUBGxBlount silt loam, ground moraine, 2-4% slopes NWI/WWI Classification:




Remarks:



01/16/20

Angela Sjollema




Yes No


of 2




0 FACW spp. x 2 = 0

FAC spp. x 3 = 0

FACU spp. x 4 = 0

1. 5 Y FAC UPL spp. x 5 = 0




40


0

Additional Remarks:

Remarks:

Sample Point:

----

--

--


------

--

------


----

--

--

Tree -

--


--

--

--

Total Cover =

Populus deltoides

--

----



--

Multiply by:

100%

--


Total Cover =

----

--


--

Typha angustifolia

----

--

---- 2

2

Species Name



NCL-alternate route N/A



Total Cover =

----

--

60% open ground

--



Total Cover =


This foregoing document was electronically filed with the Public Utilities

Commission of Ohio Docketing Information System on

11/12/2020 2:03:26 PM

in

Case No(s). 20-1236-GA-BTX

Summary: Application Appendix D.2, Part 4 of 7 electronically filed by Ms. Melissa L.Thompson on behalf of Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.

Appendix B DATA FORMS - columbiagasohio.com

Documents

Transcript of Appendix B DATA FORMS - columbiagasohio.com