APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf ·...

22
82 APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry and structured meshes for Fluent. Schematic drawings of different mesh density for the bottom section and the inlet section (J valve) are shown in this appendix. The Entire System Figure A1.1 Schematic diagram of the entire system

Transcript of APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf ·...

Page 1: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

82

APPENDIX 1

MESHING

GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

and structured meshes for Fluent. Schematic drawings of different mesh

density for the bottom section and the inlet section (J valve) are shown in this

appendix.

The Entire System

Figure A1.1 Schematic diagram of the entire system

Page 2: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

83

The Middle Section

Figure A1.2 Mesh density for (a) 10k grids (50x200) (b) 21k grids

(75x300) (c)40k (100x400) (radial x vertical)

Page 3: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

84

The Top section

Figure A1.3 Top Section- Meshing and outlet Geometry of outlet section

for 21k grids

Page 4: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

85

The Inlet section

Figure A1.4 Meshing and outlet Geometry of inlet section for 14k grids

Page 5: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

86

APPENDIX 2

DRAG MODELS

The procedure applied to specify the parameter P and Q for the

corresponding minimum fluidization velocity in the Drag model used for

Present work (equations 4.26 to 4.32) is explained in this appendix. User

defined functions (UDFs) of Fluent software allow a user to customize

FLUENT to fit his particular modeling needs in order to enhance the existing

FLUENT models. UDF is used to modify the original Syamlal and O’Brien

drag model.

Procedure for Specifying P and Q Values

In order to modify the original Syamlal and O’Brien drag model for

the minimum fluidization velocity, the corresponding values of the parameters

P and Q have to be specified. The value of B in equation B.5 should be varied

by altering the value of P (initial value, P=0.8) until vg calculated by equation

B.1 equal the minimum fluidization velocity provided experimentally. The

value of Q (initial, Q = 2.65) is then corrected by equation B.6. Finally, the

gas-solid exchange coefficient can be modeled by using the new values of P

and Q.

Procedure for Specifying P and Q Values

(A2.1)

(A2.2)

Page 6: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

87

Ret, the Reynolds number under terminal setting conditions for the

multiparticle system

Rets the Reynolds number under terminal settling conditions for a

single particle, is given by Syamlal and O’Brien (1987) as follows

= (A2.3)

Ar, Archimedes number, is expressed as

= (A2.4)

By combining Equations 4.11 and B.2 one arrives at

= (A2.5)

The following equation can be used to correct the value of Q:

Q=1.28+log(P) / log(0.85) (A2.6)

Page 7: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

88

UDF For the drag model used for the Present work

**************************************************************

/*User :RameshPLN

*/

/*Author :RameshPLN(modified from Fluent UDF-Define Exchange

Property)

*/

/*Package:Fluent 6.2.1.6

*/

/*Platform :Windows Vista

*/

/*Type :UDF<interpreted>

*/

/*Purpose :This UDF for the drag model used for the Present work

*/

/*Usage :Compile the UDF and activate it in the Interaction panel

*/

**************************************************************

#include “udf.h”

#include “sg_mphase.h”

#define pi 4.*atan(1.)

#define diam_sol 70e-6

DEFINE_EXCHANGE_PROPERTY(custom_drag_syamlal,cell,mix_thread,

s_col,f_col)

{

Thread *thread_gas,*thread_sol;

real x_vel_g,x_vel_s,y_vel_g,y_vel_s, abs_v,slip_x,slip_y,

rho_g,rho_s,mu_g,rey_sol,afac,CD,

Page 8: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

89

facvoid_g,_ter,us,_g_s;

/*find the threads for the gas(primary)and solids(secondary phases).

These phases appear in columns 2 and 1 in the interphase pnel respectively*/

Thread_gas=THREAD_SUB_THREAD(mix_thread,s_col);/*gas phase*/

Thread_sol=THREAD_SUB_THREAD(mix_thread,f_col);/*solid phase*/

/*find phase velocities and properties*/

x_vel_g=C_U(cell.thread_gas)

x_vel_g=C_V(cell.thread_gas)

x_vel_s=C_U(cell.thread_sol)

x_vel_s=C_V(cell.thread_sol)

slip_x=x_vel_g-x_vel_s;

slip_y=y_vel_g-y_vel_s;

rho_g=C_R(cell,thread_gas)

rho_s=C_R(cell,thread_sol)

n.u_g=C_MU_L(cell,thread_gas); /*laminar velocity*/

/*slip*/

abs_v=sqrt(slip_x*slip_x+slip_y*slip_y);

/*solids Reynolds number*/

rey_sol=rho_g*abs_v*diam_sol/mu_g;

/*particulaterelaxation time*/

tau_sol=rho_s*diam_sol*diam_sol/(18*mu_g);

Page 9: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

90

/*gas vol frac*/

void_g=C_VOF(cell,thread_gas)

/*coefficients for terminal velocity correlation for the solid phase*/

afac=pow(void_g,4.14);

if(void_g<=0.85)

bfac=0.1214*pow(void_g,1.28);

else

bfac=pow(void_g,14.25488);

/*terminal velocity correlation for the solid phase*/

v_term=0.5*(afac-

0.06*rey_sol+sqrt(0.0036*rey_sol*rey_sol+0.12*rey_sol*(2*bfac-

afac)+afac*afac));

/*drag coefficient*/

CD=pow((0.63+4.8(sqrt(rey_sol/v_term))),2);

/*drag function*/

f_drag=CD*rey_sol*void_g/(24*v_term);

/*fluid-solid exchange coefficient*/

k_g_s=(1-void_g)*rho_s*f_drag/tau_sol;

return k_g_s;

}

Page 10: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

91

APPENDIX 3

DATA EXTRACTION: SCHEMA AND MACROS

Fluent contains two interface methods. Graphic User Interphase

(GUI) and Text User Interphase (TUI). The (TUI) is written in a text form

called Scheme. Schemes allow users to create a sequence of Fluent commands

such as reading, writing and plotting data. In the present work schemes were

used to generate data and then save them as data files for use in other program

(Excel). Macros were then used to export data to Excel for post-processing

and visualization. This section has examples of some schemes and macros

that have been in this work.

Scheme to extract data from Fluent

**************************************************************/

*Title :Data extraction scheme

*/

/*Purpose : This extracts particle volume fraction and axial velocity

profile from

Fluent

*/

**************************************************************

(ti-menu-load-string “file/read-data HDCFB_vg8_Gs455_10000.dat”)

(ti-menu-load-string “plot/plot yes vof10 no no no solid vof yes 1 0 h.7 h1.4

h2.1 h2.8 h3.5 h4.2 h4.9 h5.6 h6.3 ( )”)

Page 11: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

92

(ti-menu-load-string “plot/plot yes vof10 no no no solid y –velocity yes 1 0

h.7 h1.4 h2.1 h2.8 h3.5 h4.2 h4.9 h5.6 h6.3 ( )”)

(ti-menu-load-string “file/read-data HDCFB_vg8_Gs455_10100.dat”)

(ti-menu-load-string “plot/plot yes vof10.1 no no no solid vof yes 1 0 h.7 h1.4

h2.1 h2.8 h3.5 h4.2 h4.9 h5.6 h6.3 ( )”)

(ti-menu-load-string “plot/plot yes vof10.1 no no no solid y-velocity yes 1 0

h.7 h1.4 h2.1 h2.8 h3.5 h4.2 h4.9 h5.6 h6.3 ( )”)

(ti-menu-load-string “file/read-data HDCFB_vg8_Gs455_10200.dat”)

(ti-menu-load-string “plot/plot yes vof10.1 no no no solid vof yes 1 0 h.7 h1.4

h2.1 h2.8 h3.5 h4.2 h4.9 h5.6 h6.3 ( )”)

(ti-menu-load-string “plot/plot yes vof10.1 no no no solid y-velocity yes 1 0

h.7 h1.4 h2.1 h2.8 h3.5 h4.2 h4.9 h5.6 h6.3 ( )”)

(ti-menu-load-string “file/read-data HDCFB_vg8_Gs455_10300.dat”)

(ti-menu-load-string “plot/plot yes vof10.1 no no no solid vof yes 1 0 h.7 h1.4

h2.1 h2.8 h3.5 h4.2 h4.9 h5.6 h6.3 ( )”)

(ti-menu-load-string “plot/plot yes vof10.1 no no no solid y-velocity yes 1 0

h.7 h1.4 h2.1 h2.8 h3.5 h4.2 h4.9 h5.6 h6.3 ( )”)

(ti-menu-load-string “file/read-data HDCFB_vg8_Gs455_10400.dat”)

(ti-menu-load-string “plot/plot yes vof10.1 no no no solid vof yes 1 0 h.7 h1.4

h2.1 h2.8 h3.5 h4.2 h4.9 h5.6 h6.3 ( )”)

(ti-menu-load-string “plot/plot yes vof10.1 no no no solid y-velocity yes 1 0

h.7 h1.4 h2.1 h2.8 h3.5 h4.2 h4.9 h5.6 h6.3 ( )”)

(ti-menu-load-string “file/read-data HDCFB_vg8_Gs455_10600.dat”)

(ti-menu-load-string “plot/plot yes vof10.1 no no no solid vof yes 1 0 h.7 h1.4

h2.1 h2.8 h3.5 h4.2 h4.9 h5.6 h6.3 ( )”)

Page 12: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

93

(ti-menu-load-string “plot/plot yes vof10.1 no no no solid y-velocity yes 1 0

h.7 h1.4 h2.1 h2.8 h3.5 h4.2 h4.9 h5.6 h6.3 ( )”)

(ti-menu-load-string “file/read-data HDCFB_vg8_Gs455_10700.dat”)

(ti-menu-load-string “plot/plot yes vof10.1 no no no solid vof yes 1 0 h.7 h1.4

h2.1 h2.8 h3.5 h4.2 h4.9 h5.6 h6.3 ( )”)

(ti-menu-load-string “plot/plot yes vof10.1 no no no solid y-velocity yes 1 0

h.7 h1.4 h2.1 h2.8 h3.5 h4.2 h4.9 h5.6 h6.3 ( )”)

Macro for importing data to excel

Sub volume_fraction_data _extraction()

‘Volume_fraction_data_extraction Macro

‘Macro recorded 2010/01/10 by Ramesh PLN

WithActivesheet.querytables.add(Connection:=

“TEXT;E:\HDCFB\gidaspow\vof38.9’,Destination:=Range(“BGI”))

.Name=”vof3.89”

.FieldNames=True

.RowNumbers=False

.FillAdjacentFormulas=False

.PreserveFormatting=True

.RefreshOnFileOpen=False

.RefreshStyle=xIInsertDeleteCells

.SavePassword=False

.SaveData=True

.AdjustColumnWidth=True

.RefreshPeriod=0

Page 13: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

94

.TextFilePromptOnRefresh=Flase

.TextFilePlatform=437

.Text fileStartRow=1

.TextParsetype=xlDelimited

.TextFileParseQualifier=xlTextQualifierDoubleQuote

.TextFileConsecutiveDelimiter=False

.TextFileTabDelimiter=True

.TextFileSemicolonDelimiter=False

.TextFileCommaDelimiter=False

.TextFileSpaceDelimiter=False

.TextFileColumnDataTypes=Array(1,1)

.textFileTrailingMinusNumbers=True

.RefreshBackgrounduesry:=False

End with

With ActiveSheet.QueryTables.Add(Connection:=

“TEXT;E:\Adnan\Theses\HDFCB\gidaspov\vof39”,Destination:=Range(“B1

1”)

.Name=’vof39”

.fieldNames=true

.RowNumbers=False

FillAdjacentFormulas=False

.PreserveFormatting=True

Page 14: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

95

APPENDIX 4

INVESTIGATION ON INLET CONDITIONS

In the present work, an accurate modeling of the inlet conditions

was impossible, because there were no observations or measurements

provided for the inlet conditions during the experiments. Miller and Gidaspow

(1992) reported that an exact inlet condition is difficult to measure due to its

transient nature and as a consequence their accuracy is usually low. Therefore,

different inlet conditions (uniform and non-uniform) were modeled in order to

investigate the sensitivity of the simulation predictions to the inlet conditions

The uniform inlet condition has the same values of the inlet solid volume

fraction, as, the inlet solid velocity, us, and the inlet gas velocity ug, over the

inlet cross sectional area, which correspond to the experimental operating

condition of solid mass flux, Gs, and superficial gas velocity, Ug.

The non-uniform inlet condition, which has different values of the

inlet parameters, was defined numerically follow:

The inlet section was examined initially by modeling the J-valve

solely without considering the riser (Figure A4.1). It was found that the riser

inlet has non-uniform particles volume fraction and axial particle velocity

distributions (Figure A4.2). The particles were dragged vertically towards the

wall without interfering in the gas flow. However, in order to generate a more

realistic modeling a combined geometry of the inlet section and the riser was

modeled (Figure A4.3). Figure A4.4 shows the radial profile of particles

volume fraction and particles axial velocity at the riser inlet. The particles

Page 15: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

96

entered the riser at their maximum packing limit of 0.55 with velocity as low

as m/s near the light wall, while the particle with volume fraction approaching

zero in the rest of the inlet cross section. In order to model an entrance zone in

2-D geometry with entrance velocity profile similar to that of 3-D system, the

non-uniform inlet condition was defined by using velocity profiles near the

two walls of the 2-D (Figure A4.5). Figure A4.6 compares model predictions

using the uniform and non-uniform inlet conditions with experimental results.

While the non-uniform inlet distribution model correctly predicted the flow

hydrodynamics, the uniform inlet distribution model failed to predict most of

the gas-solid flow behaviors. The overall solid volume fraction was

underestimated significantly (Figure A4.6(a) and A.4.6 (b)) when one

compares the experimental and the non-uniform inlet distribution model. The

particle velocity was also lower than the core particle velocity (Figure

A.4.6(d)). This comparison shows that the implementation of correct inlet

conditions is critical for the successful simulation of the flow hydrodynamics.

Figure A4.1 Solid volume fraction distribution (a), and particle velocity

distribution (b) of the inlet section of the CFB riser,(J-

valve model)

Page 16: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

97

Figure A4.2 Radial profiles of solid volume fraction distribution (a), and

particle axial (b) at the riser inlet,(Z=0,J-valve model)

Figure A4.3 Solid volume fraction distribution (a), and particle velocity

distribution (b) of the inlet section of the CFB riser,(J-valve

+ riser model)

Page 17: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

98

Figure A4.4 Radial profiles of solid volume fraction distribution (a), and

particle axial (b) at the riser inlet,(Z=0,J-valve + riser model)

Figure A4.5 Schematic diagram of the 2-D riser with non-uniform inlet

condition

Page 18: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

99

Figure A4.6 Radial (a) and axial (b) profiles of solid volume fraction,

radial profiles of solid mass flux (c) and axial particle

velocity (d) form uniform and non-uniform inlet conditions

(z=3.8m)

Page 19: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

100

APPENDIX 5

TURBULENCE MODEL

The Turbulence model used in the present work is summarized in

this section for the primary phase (gas) and the secondary phase (particles)

Table A5.1 Turbulence in primary phase

Turbulent Kinetic energy

+ . = . k + +

(A5.1)

Dissipation Energy

. .

) (A5.2)

Related Equations:

= (A5.3)

= C (A5.4)

= C (A5.5)

(A5.6)

Model constants:

= 0.09, = 1, = 1.3, = 1.44, = 1.92, = 1.2, = 0.5

Page 20: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

101

Table A5.2 Turbulence in secondary phase

Turbulent kinetic Energy

(A5.7)

Related Equations

= (1 + ) (A5.8)

= (A5.9)

= (A5.10)

= (A5.11)

= 1.8 1.35 (A5.12)

= (A5.13)

= (A5.14)

, = + (A5.15)

Page 21: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

102

APPENDIX 6

STEADY STATE CONDITION

The appendix describes the procedure used to confirm that the model

has reached the quasi steady state condition.

Steady State Condition

The multiphase flow in CFB is chaotic and transient. Therefore

reaching an exact steady state condition is not possible. However a quasi

steady state condition can be reached when the riser contains the desired

particle loading. In the present work the quasi steady condition was by

monitoring the solid mass flux at the outlet. The integration of solid mass flux

over the outlet cross section gave an average solid mass flux of 462 kg/m2s,

which is 1.6% different from the inlet solid value (455 kg/m2s) after 15 s from

the beginning of the simulation, and then fluctuated within 2.2% of the inlet

solid flux value. This indicates that the quasi steady state condition was

reached after 15 s.

Page 22: APPENDIX 1 MESHINGshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/11550/12/12_appendices 1 to 6.pdf · APPENDIX 1 MESHING GAMBIT 2.2.30 from Fluent Inc. was used to create 2-D geometry

103

Figure A6.1 Transient behaviour of the integral solid mass flux at the

riser outlet