App III. Group Algebra & Reduction of Regular Representations 1. Group Algebra 2. Left Ideals,...
-
date post
22-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of App III. Group Algebra & Reduction of Regular Representations 1. Group Algebra 2. Left Ideals,...
App III. Group Algebra & Reduction of Regular Representations
1. Group Algebra
2. Left Ideals, Projection Operators
3. Idempotents
4. Complete Reduction of the Regular Representation
III.1. Group Algebra
Definition III.1: Group Algebra
The group algebra { ; • ,+, } of a finite group { G, • } is the set
,j jj jr g r g G r G C
Together with the algebraic rules:
j jjr q g r q , & ,r q G C
i ji jr q g g r q k i j
k i jg r q wherek
i j k i jg g g
Comments
• { ; • ,+ } is a ring with identity
• { ; +, } is a complex linear vector space spanned by { | gj }
• An inner product can be defined by (we won't be using it):i i
j jg g so that*j k
k jr q g g r q * jjr q
An element r of also serves as an operator on it via • as follows
kj k jrg r g g k m
k j mr g
or k mj m k jr g g r m k m
k jjD r r
so thatj
jr q r g q k m jm k jg r q m j
m jg D r q
m mg r q g rq m j
jD r qm k j
k j r q
Definition III.2: Representation of
Let be the space of linear operators on V.
A rep of on V is a homomorphism
U: r U(r)
that preserves the group algebra structure, i.e.,
Representation of
U r q U r U q
U rq U r U q, & ,r q G C
U() is an irreducible representation (IR) if V has no non-trivial invariant subspace wrt U()
Theorem III.1:
• U is rep of U is rep of G
• U is IR of U is IR of G
III.2. Left Ideals, Projection Operators
( V of DR of G ) =
Since 1
CnRD n D
where D are IRs
& nC = number of classes
( is decomposable)
1 1
C nn
aa
L
G
2
2
2
1
C
C
C
R
n
n
n
D O
D
D
D
O
D
n Blocks n Blocks
p r p r L
L is an invariant subspace:
r L
p
G L is a left ideal.If L doesn't contain a smaller ideal, it is minimal
~ irreducible invar subspace
Minimal left ideals can be found by means of projections (idempotents)
A projection Pa onto the minimal left ideal L
a must satisfy
1.
a aP r L r G i.e., a aP L G
2.
aq L aP q q
3.a aP r r P r G
4.a b ab aP P r P
1
n
L L
The projection onto is P
1
Cn
L
G
III.3. Idempotents
e has a unique decomposition e e
e L
Theorem III.2: P r r e
Proof:
1. P is linear: Proof left as exercise.
2.
r re r e
P r
r
3.
:P r r L
:P r r P P r q P rq rq e
r P q r qe rq e
4. :P P P e e e e e
e e e
P P P
Definition III.3:
{ e } are idempotents if e e e
{ e } are essentially idempotents if e e e c
All results remain valid if P & e are replaced by P & e
, resp.
Definition III.4:
A primitive idempotent generates a minimal left ideal.
Theorem III.3:
An idempotent e is primitive iff re r e c e r G
Proof ( ) :
e is primitive L re r G is a minimal left ideal
& realization of on L is irreducible
Define R by R q q e r e L q G
Rs q R sq sq e r e s q e r e sR q Rs sR
Schur's lemma re r e c e
s G
Proof ( ) :
Let re r e c e e e e r G If e is not primitive
ee e e e e' & e'' are idempotents eee e e e e e e e ce e e e 2c ee 2c e 2c c
0c e e 1c e e e is primitive
Theorem III.4:
Primitive idempotents e1 & e2 generate equivalent IRs iff
1 2 0e r e for some r
Proof () :
Let L1 & L2 be minimal left ideals generated by e1 & e2, resp.
Assume 1 2 0e r e s for some r
Let 1 2:S L L 1 2 1q q q sby
1 1S p q S p q 1p q s 1p q s 1p S q
1q G
S p = p S p
Schur's lemma L1 = L2 so that IRs on them are equivalent
1 1 2 2q e r e L
Proof () :
If the IRs D1 & D2 are equivalent, there exists S such that
1 2SD p D p S p G
or, equivalently, there exists mapping 1 2:S L L S p pS
Let 1 2s S e L
1 1 1S e S e e 1 1Se e 1 1e S e 1e s 1e s
1s e s
2s L 2s se
i.e.
1 2s e s se 1 2 0e se QED
Example: Reduction of DR of G = C3 = { e = a3, a, a2 = a–1 }
i) Idempotent e1 for the identity representation 1 :
1
1
gG
e gn
11
3e a a
Rearrangement theorem 1 1ge e g G
1 1 2,
1
g gG
e e g gn
2,
1
g gG
gn
1
1
gG
en
1e
1 1 1 1 1e g e e e e g G
r G1 1 1 1j
je r e e g r e 1j
j
e r 1r e
Theorem III.3 e1 is primitive
1 is irreducible
ii) Let 12e xe ya za Then
1 2 10 e e x y z e
12e xe ya za
1 12 2e e xe ya za xe ya za 2 2 2 12 2 2x yz e x y z a zx y a
2 2x yz x 22x y z y 22zx y z 0x y z
This can be solved using Mathematica. 4 sets of solutions are obtained:
0x y z
1 1 1, 1 3 , 1 33 6 6
x y i z i
1 1 1, 1 3 , 1 33 6 6
x y i z i
2 1 1, ,3 3 3
x y z
( Discarded )
2 /3 2 /31 1 1, ,3 3 3
i ix y e z e or
2 /3 2 /31 1 1, ,3 3 3
i ix y e z e or
2 1 1, ,3 3 3
x y z 112
3e e a a
e e e e e 112
3ae e a a a e 1 1 11
23
a e e a a e a
112
3e e e e a a 1 1 11 2 1 1
2 2 23 3 3 3
e a a a a e a e a
116 3 3
9e a a e e is indeed idempotent
112
3e ae e a a e 1 1 11 2 1 1
2 2 23 3 3 3
a a e a e a e a a
113 6 3
9e a a ae e is not primitive
2 /3 2 /31 1 1, ,3 3 3
i ix y e z e 1 11
3e e a a
2 /3ie
e e e e e 1 11
3ae e a a a e
1 1 1 11
3a e e a a e a
1 11
3e e e e a a
1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1
3 3 3 3e a a a a e a e a
1 113 3 3
9e a a
2 1
e e+ is indeed idempotent
e a e a e e 1 e
2 /3 2 /31 1 1, ,3 3 3
i ix y e z e 1 11
3e e a a
a e
1 e
e
1 1e a e a e e 1a e
e e+ is primitive
Changing –1 & e+ e– gives
e e e e a e e 1 1e a e e
e– is a primitive idempotent
1 11
3e e e e a a
a e e a e 1 1 1a e e a e
11
3e e e
0
e a e a e e 1 e e 0
1 1e a e a e e e e 0
e+ & e– generate inequivalent IRs.
1
11
3
1
1
1 1 1
1
1
C e a a basis
e s
e
e
Ex: Check the Orthogonality theorems
e e e Also:
III.4. Complete Reduction of the Regular Representation
Summary:
1.1
Cn
L
G
2. L r e r G
3.1
n
aa
L L
e e e e e
a b ab a re r e e primitive
Reduction of DR Finding all inequivalent ea's.
L is a 2-sided ideal, i.e., r L q r s L ,q s G
A 2-sided ideal is minimal if it doesn't contain another 2-sided ideal.
If a minimal 2-sided ideal L contains a minimal left-sided ideal La ,
then it is a direct sum of all minimal left-sided ideals of the same .
Proof:
Let La and L
b correspond to equivalent IRs ( belong to same ). Then
0a bs s e s e G s ( See proof of Theorem III.4 )
La and L
b are both in the 2-sided ideal L if either of them is.
a a b br L rs r e s e L sHence
Let La and L
b be both in the 2-sided ideal L . Then
b bs L s L G
they generate equivalent rep's. QED
Reduction of DR :
1. Decompose into minimal 2-sided ideals L.
2. Reduce each L into minimal left ideals L
a