AO SODRUGESTVO - T project INTHEAT Veszprem 2011 SODRU – Spivdruzhnist-T Joint Stock Company...
-
Upload
derick-whitehead -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
2
Transcript of AO SODRUGESTVO - T project INTHEAT Veszprem 2011 SODRU – Spivdruzhnist-T Joint Stock Company...
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
SODRU – Spivdruzhnist-T Joint Stock Company
Kharkiv, UKRAINE
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
SUDRU - INTHEAT
Basic role in the project: • contributing to the application of PHEs and into
development of new heat transfer enhancement products in various types of industry
• develop and test the heat transfer enhancement technologies that could be further used in similar cases in industry, especially in application of the “zero waste” and “zero carbon” concepts.
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
SODRU- INTHEAT• SODRU is partner in the project INTHEAT
– SME ParticipantInvolved in the work packages: – WP1. Analysis of fouling in PHEs – WP2. Heat transfer enhancement in PHEs– WP4. Design, retrofit of intensified heat
recovery networks– WP5. Putting into practice– WP6.Technology transfer
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
SODRU is dealing mostly with Plate Heat Exchangers
and concentrating on this type of heat transfer equipment
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Plate Heat Exchangers – high efficient modern heat transfer
equipment with enhanced heat transfer
• compactness (it allows to release free space areas in existing heating stations and it helps to significantly reduce the cost of building new ones);
• primary heat carrier flow rate reduction for heating (owing to their identical channel geometry and high efficiency);
• easy in operation (the device is easily cleansed by chemical cleaning or their heat transfer surface may be totally opened by simple removal of the tightening bolts);
• low weight; • sanitary clean design;• the absence of cross-flows between heat carrier and heated media;• close temperature approach of heating and heated streams (down to 1 K).
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
The construction of Plate Heat Exchanger
6
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
The generally used plate of PHE
1 - heat carrier inlet and outlet
2 - zone for flow distribution
2β
3 - rubber gasket
4 - the main corrugated field
5 - zone for flow distribution
7
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Geometry of plates with different corrugation types
A-A3)
4)
b
2β
АА
В
В
SA
B-BS
b
S=SAβ=90°
S
1)
2)
S
1, 2 - the intersection of the adjacent plates; 3 - channel cross sections for the sinusoidal form of corrugations;4 - channel cross sections for the triangular form of corrugations
8
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
WP1. Analysis of intensified heat transfer under fouling
Task 1.1. Experimental fouling investigation
Supporting with UNIBATH, UNIMAN• Data collection and analysis for PHEs
Task 2.1. CFD research on heat transfer
Supporting with UNIBATH, UPB• Data collection and analysis for PHEs
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Work Package 1
Technical review of fouling and its impact on heat transfer
(for Plate Heat Exchangers)
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Fouling factors in PHEs up to 10 times lower
then in shell and tubes
• Marriot J. (1971)
• Cooper A. et al. (1980)
• Tovazhnyansky L, Kapustenko P (1984)
• Panchal CH, Rabas TJ (1999)
• Hesselgraves JE (2001)
• Wang L, Sunden B, Manglik RM (2007)
• Gogenko LA et al. (2007)
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Fouling factors for PHEs compared with TEMA values from Panchal and Rabas (1999)
Process Fluid
Rf – PHE m2/K kW
Rf – TEMA m2/K kW
Water Soft 0.018 0.18-0.35 Cooling tower water 0.044 0.18-0.35 Seawater 0.026 0.18-0.35 River water 0.044 0.35-0.53
Lube oil 0.053 0.36 Organic solvents 0.018-0.053 0.36 Steam (oil bearing) 0.009 0.18
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Comprehensive experimental study of particulate fouling was reported by Karabelas et al. (1997)
This type of fouling is typical of most cases of cooling water fouling.
Using Equations obtained at Deliverable D2.1. of recent Project we estimated wall shear stresses for conditions reported by Karabelas et al. (1997).
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
The influence of wall shear stress on asymptotic value of fouling thermal resistance in PHE
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Conclusions WP1.
• There is close link between fouling and wall shear stress in PHEs.
• For shear stress high than 30N/m² available data uncertain.
• Experimental study to establish the link between fouling and wall shear stress at intensified heat transfer are needed to be obtained by UNIBATH.
• It will allow to account for PHEs fouling in UNIPAN HEN design methodology.
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Main References for WP1 (more in the report)
• Cooper A, Suitor JW, Usher JD, 1980, Cooling water fouling in Plate Heat Exchangers. Heat Transfer Engineering, 1(3), pp.50 – 55.
• Gogenko AL, Anipko OB, Arsenyeva OP, Kapustenko PO, 2007, Accounting for fouling in plate heat exchanger design. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 12: 207–213.
• Hesselgreaves JE, 2001, Compact Heat Exchangers. Selection, Design and Operation. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
• Karabelas AJ et al, 1997, Liquid side fouling of Heat Exchangers. An Integrated R&D Approach for Conventional and Novel Designs. Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol.7, Nos.8-10, pp.727 – 737.
• Marriott J, 1971, Where and How to Use Plate Heat Exchangers, Chemical Engineering, vol.78, no. 8, pp. 127-134.
• Panchal, CH and Rabas, TJ, 1999, Fouling Characteristics of Compact Heat Exchangers and Enhanced Tubes, Proc. International Conference on Compact Heat Exchangers and Enhancement Technology for the Process Industries, Banff, Canada. Begell House, New York.
• Tovazhnyansky LL and Kapustenko PA, 1984, Intensification of heat and mass transfer in channels of plate condensers. Chem. Engineering Communications, 31(6), 351–366.
• Wang L, Sunden B, Manglik RM, 2007, PHEs. Design, Applications and Performance. Southhampton: WIT Press.
16
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
WP2. Combined tube-side and shell-side heat exchanger enhancement
Task 2.1., Task 2.2. Heat transfer enhancement in PHEs
Supporting with UNIBATH, UNIMAN• Data collection and analysis for PHEs
Task 2.3. Mathematical modelling
Supporting with UNIBATH, UNIMAN• Data collection and analysis for PHEs
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Experimental investigations of pressure drop in PHE channels (the number rather limited, papers from 70th-80th are cited in most recent literature as reliable data) :
• Savostin and Tikhonov (1970)• Tovazhnyansky et al. (1980)• Focke et al. (1985)• Heavner et al. (1993)• Dović et al. (2009)• Muley and Manglik (1999)• Arsenyeva et al. (2009)
18
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
The influence of corrugation angle to flow direction on friction factor by Tovazhnyansky et al. (1980)
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Observed:
• All authors obtained different correlations for their channels.
• The strong influence of channel geometry on friction factor correlations.
• Main influencing parameters:
1. Corrugation angle to flow direction;
2. Corrugation pitch to height ratio;
3. Ratio of developed to projected area.
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Generalization attempts:
• Martin H (1996)
• Dović D., Palm B. and Švaić S (2009)
Drawbacks:
1. Implicit correlating functions
2. Low accuracy (error up to 70%)
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Experimental investigations of heat transfer in PHE channels (the number rather limited, papers from 70th-80th are cited in most recent literature as reliable data)
• Savostin and Tikhonov (1970)• Tovazhnyansky et al. (1980)• Heavner et al. (1993)• Dović et al. (2009)• Muley and Manglik (1999)• Arsenyeva et al. (2009)• Khan et al. (2010)
22
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Observed:
• All authors obtained different correlations for their channels.
• The strong influence of channel geometry on heat transfer correlations.
• Main influencing parameters:
1. Corrugation angle to flow direction;
2. Corrugation pitch to height ratio;
3. Ratio of developed to projected area.
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Generalization attempts:
• Martin H (1996)
• Dović D., Palm B. and Švaić S (2009)
Calculation of heat transfer through friction factor by Leveque analogy (originally proposed for laminar flow)
Drawbacks:
1. Obscure physical background
2. Low accuracy (error up to 50%)
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Modification of Reynolds analogy for PHE channels by Tovazhnyansky and Kapustenko (1984)
• Assumed that film heat transfer coefficient in PHE channel and in straight pipe with the same shear stress on the wall are equel
• In a tubes Reynolds analogy holds true and the following equation can be derived for PHE channel:
0.14
6 3 0.47 70.065 Re Prsw
Nu
and w dynamic viscosity at stream and at wall temperatures;
/eNu h d – Nusselt number; – heat conductivity of the stream, W/(m·K);
ed - equivalent diameter of channel, m; h – film heat transfer coefficient, W/(m2·K);
Pr – Prandtl number; s – friction factor accounting for total pressure losses in channel;
Re /ew d – Reynolds number; w – stream velocity in channel, m/s;
– the share of pressure loss due to friction on the wall in total loss of pressure;
– cinematic viscosity, m2/s.
25
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
The experimental data of Tovazhnyansky et al. (1980) for four experimental samples of PHE channel
(solid lines ψ=1)
26
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
• The main parameter, which is not determined in Equation for Nu is the share of pressure loss due to friction on the wall in total loss of pressure ψ. • Its value can be estimated on comparison with experimental data on heat transfer in models of PHE channels.
•The analysis of flow patterns in PHE channels by Dović et al. (2009) have shown a stronger mixing at higher β and Reynolds numbers. The mixing is associated with flow disruptions, which are contributing to the rise of form drag and consequent decrease in the share ψ of pressure loss due to friction on the wall.
• Correlating ψ calculated from Equation at experimental values of Nu, the formula describing dependence of ψ from β and Reynolds number can be obtained.
Average shear stress on the wall:
27
2
8wx
W
F
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Conclusions on WP2.
• There is a strong influence of PHE channel geometry on friction factor and heat transfer correlations.
• Main influencing parameters:
1.Corrugation angle to flow direction;
2.Corrugation pitch to height ratio;
3.Ratio of developed to projected area.• Proposed generalised correlations are not giving accuracy sufficient for correct design of industrial PHEs
28
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Main References (more in the report)
• Arsenyeva O., Tovazhnyansky L., Kapustenko P. and Khavin G., 2009, Mathematical Modelling and Optimal Design of Plate-and-Frame Heat Exchangers. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 18, 791-796 DOI: 10.3303/CET0918129
• Dović D., Palm B. and Švaić S., 2009, Generalized correlations for predicting heat transfer and pressure drop in plate heat exchanger channels of arbitrary geometry. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 52, 4553–4563.
• Focke WW, Zacharadies J, Olivier I, 1985, The effect of the corrugation inclinationangle on the thermohydraulic performance of plate heat exchangers. Int. J.Heat Mass Transfer, 28, 1469–1479.
• Heavner R.L., Kumar H. and Wanniarachchi A.S., 1993, Performance of an industrial plate heat exchanger: effect of chevron angle. AICHE Symposium Series, New York, USA, 89 (295), 262-267.
• Khan TS, Khan MS, Chyu M-C, Ayub ZH, 2010, Experimental investigation of single phase convective heat transfer coefficient in a corrugated plate heat exchanger for multiple plate configurations. Applied Thermal Engineering. 30 (8-9), 1058–1065.
• Martin H., 1996, Theoretical approach to predict the performance of chevron-type plate heat exchangers, Chemical Engineering and Processing, 35, 301–310.
• Muley A. and Manglik R.M., 1999, Experimental study of turbulent flow heat transfer and pressure drop in a plate heat exchanger with chevron plates. ASME Journal of Heat Transfer, 121, 110–117.
• Savostin AF and Tikhonov AM, 1970, Investigation of the characteristics of plate-type heating surfaces. Thermal Engineering, 17 (9), 113-117.
• Tovazhnyansky L.L., Kapustenko P.A. and Tsibulnic V.A., 1980, Heat transfer and hydraulic resistance in channels of plate heat exchangers. Energetika, 9, 123-125.
• Tovazhnyansky LL and Kapustenko PA, 1984, Intensification of heat and mass transfer in channels of plate condensers. Chem. Engineering Communications, 31(6), 351–366.
29
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
WP4. Design, retrofit and control of intensified heat recovery networks
Task 4.1. Development of a streamlined and computationally efficient methodology for design of HENs
Supporting with UNIPAN• Providing industrial case study and testing approachTask 4.2. A systematic retrofit procedure with accounting
for fouling
Supporting with UNIPAN, UNIMAN• Validating system for PHEs
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
WP4. Design, retrofit and control of intensified heat recovery networks
Task 4.3. Development of a software tool
Supporting with UNIPAN, UNIMAN• Validating system for PHEs
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Two Columns unit for Benzene Hydrocarbons Extraction from Coke-Oven Gas
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
One Column unit for Benzene Hydrocarbons Extraction from Coke-Oven Gas
Figure 2: Principal flowsheet of benzene hydrocarbons extraction plant. Sc – scrubber; Col – stripping column; P-1 – pump; HE-1, HE-2 – recuperative heat exchangers; H1 – steam heater; C1, C3 – water cooler; C2 – air cooler; 1-1 – 1-4 – regenerated stripping oil; 2-1 – 2-3 – benzene hydrocarbons mixture; 3-1 – 3-5 – stripping oil from the scrubber; 4-1 – 4-2 – coke-oven gas; CW1, CW2 – cooling water; S-1, S-2 – steam.
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Coal tar distillation
Pitcht =370 C°
t=75
-80
C°
CW
Lig
ht o
il
Wat
ert=
50-5
5C°
t=25-35 C°
t=39
5-40
5C°
H O2
Overflow
t=40
-50
C°
Light oil
t=45 C°
2-nd anthracenefraction
t = 300-320 C°
20%
t=95
-105
C°
CW CW CW
CW CW CW
Phen
ol f
ract
ion 3-
4%t=
180
-190
C°N
apht
hale
ne fr
actio
n10
%
Str
ippi
ng f
ract
ion
15%
t= 2
65-2
68C°
t= 2
10-2
13C°
t=365 C°
t=80
C°
t=90
-100
C°
t=90 C°
CW
CW
t=60 C°
t= 20-25 C°
Steam
Cond.
Leakages 10-15%
Tablets 50%
t = 95-105 C°
t=90 C°
18tfor hours 12
6-8 t
Residue35-40%
Steam
Conde atens
t=13
0C°
Light oil
CW
Coal tar supply
t=105 C°
10-12 t
t=100 C°
To storageof oils
12
3
4 56
7
8 9
10
11
1213 14
15
16
17 18 19
20
21 22
23
24
25
26
27
2829
3031
33
32
Nap
htha
lene
t=120-135 C°1%
Steam Cond.
Steam
Cond.
50%
Steam
Conde atens
Plant of phthalicanhydride
1 - intermediate tank of coal tar; 2 - water free coal tar tank; 3 - furnace;4, 5 - 1 and 2 stagesevaporators; 6, 11 - light oil separators; 7, 10 - cooling condenser of the 1 stage and distillationcolumn (stripper); 8, 9 - pumps; 12 - light oil intermediate tank; 13 - reflux tank; 14 - refluxpump of stripper; 15 - distillation column (stripper); 16-19 - immersed coolers of 2 anthracene,stripping, naphthalene and phenol fractions; 20 - gross head tank; 21, 29 - crystalliser; 22 - smallhead tank; 23, 30 - mixers; 24 - pressing unit; 25, 26, 32 - melting tanks; 27, 28 - naphthaleneintermediate tanks; 31 - decanter; 33 - naphthalene storage tank.
st nd
st
nd
CWCW
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
WP5. Putting into practice
Task 5.3. Demonstration and application of intensified heat exchangers to Coal Chemical industry
Supporting with UNIMAN and UNIPAN on following task:
• Data collection and setting up base case• Heat recovery systems modelling• Perform targeting study with heat integration methods to
identify maximum potentials for energy savings• Network pinch to asses the bottleneck for further energy
recovery
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
WP5. Putting into practice- cont.
• Application of optimization method, with full appreciation of intensified heat transfer equipment and rigorous consideration of fouling
• Operational analysis to understand the impacts of upgraded heat recovery networks
• Validation of practicability of the improved methods in Coal Chemical industry
• Demonstration of the benefits of the improved methods in terms of energy and emissions savings
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
WP6.Technology transfer
Task 6.1. Technology transfer to SME consortium members
Collaboration with all partners• Provisions for streamlined transfer of the developed and
acquired technologies, licenses and know-how among the consortium members
• Task 6.2. Dissemination eventsCollaboration with all partners• “Integrated Technologies and Energy Saving”: a Workshop
in Ukraine
AO SODRUGESTVO - Tp
roje
ct
INTH
EA
TVeszprem 2011
Thank you!