Antioxidant and tyrosinase inhibitory activities of different parts of oriental cherry (Prunus...
-
Upload
ji-won-park -
Category
Documents
-
view
229 -
download
6
Transcript of Antioxidant and tyrosinase inhibitory activities of different parts of oriental cherry (Prunus...
Food Sci. Biotechnol. 21(2): 339-343 (2012)
DOI 10.1007/s10068-012-0045-x
Antioxidant and Tyrosinase Inhibitory Activities of Different Parts of
Oriental Cherry (Prunus serrulata var. spontanea)
Ji Won Park, Hyun Gyun Yuk, and Seung Cheol Lee
Received: 28 June 2011 / Revised: 12 October 2011 / Accepted: 14 October 2011 / Published Online: 30 April 2012
© KoSFoST and Springer 2012
Abstract Six different parts (branch, flesh, flower, fruit,
leaf, and seed) of oriental cherry (Prunus serrulata var.
spontanea) were extracted with ethanol or water, then total
phenol content (TPC), antioxidant activity, and tyrosinase
inhibitory activity of the extracts were evaluated. The
ethanol extracts showed higher TPC and antioxidant activity
than the water extracts regardless of parts. The ethanol
extracts of leaf as well as branch possessed superior TPC
and antioxidant activity. The highest tyrosinase inhibitory
activity was found in ethanol extract of leaf. There was no
dramatic difference of tyrosinase inhibitory activities
according to parts of cherry. The results suggest that leaf
and branch of oriental cherry could be a candidate for
antioxidant and anti-whitening materials in food or cosmetic
industries.
Keywords: oriental cherry (Prunus serrulata var. spontanea),
antioxidant activity, tyrosinase inhibitory activity
Introduction
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and free radicals, such as
superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radical,
are constantly formed in the human body by normal
metabolic action. Their action is opposed by a balanced
system of antioxidant defenses, including antioxidant
compounds and enzymes. Upsetting this balance causes
oxidative stress, which can lead to cell injury and death (1).
Synthetic antioxidants such as butylated hydroxyanisole
(BHA) and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) are known to
induce carcinogenesis by mutagenicity and toxicity against
human enzymes and lipids (2). Therefore, studies of natural
antioxidants are attractive to investigators for use in foods
or medicinal materials instead of synthetic antioxidants.
Particularly, much research has been focused on natural
products including plant and vegetables sources (3-5).
Tyrosinase is a key enzyme for melanin production in
plants and animals, which is fashioned in melanocytes
located within the basal epidermis (6). It has been also
reported that tyrosinase is associated with neurodegenerative
diseases (7). Recently, tyrosinase inhibitors are becoming
increasingly important in the cosmetic industry, due to their
skin-whitening effects (8).
The Prunus serrulata var. spontanea (commonly called
as oriental cherry, East Asian cherry, or Japanese cherry),
which belongs to the Rosaceae family, is found throughout
Korean peninsula. Cherry been used as a medicinal plant
for a long time in Asia. Especially, red cherry fruits have
been used as a traditional herbal remedy for various
diseases such as heart failure, beriberi, dropsy, and mastitis.
Bark and stems of cherry have been also used for relaxation
and detoxification (9-11). Some researchers have examined
oriental cherry to determine the source and the level of
antioxidant and anticancer activities (12,13). However, the
physiological activity of oriental cherry according to parts
has little been investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study
was to evaluate the antioxidant and tyrosinase inhibitory
activities of 6 different parts (branch, flesh, flower, fruit,
leaf, and seed) of oriental cherry.
Ji Won Park, Seung Cheol Lee ( )Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungnam University,Changwon, Gyeongnam 631-701, KoreaTel: +82-55-2492684; Fax: +82-505-9992171E-mail: [email protected].
Hyun Gyun YukFood Science and Technology Programme, Department of Chemistry,National University of Singapore, Science Drive, Singapore 117543,Singapore
RESEARCH ARTICLE
340 Park et al.
Materials and Methods
Materials Cherry (Prunus serrulata var. spontanea) was
collected in May to August 2010 at Changwon-si area,
Korea, and was divided into 6 different parts; branch, flesh
without seed, flower, fruit with seed, leaf, and seed.
Arbutin, ABTS, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and DPPH
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
L-Ascorbic acid, hydrogen peroxide, potassium chloride,
potassium phosphate, sodium chloride, sodium hydroxide,
tyrosinase (from mushroom), and L-tyrosine were also
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Folin-Ciocalteu reagents
were from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka,
Japan). All the other organic solvents and chemicals used
in this study were of analytical grade.
Preparation of extracts from cherry Each 10 g of 6
different parts of the cherry was extracted with 200 mL of
70%(v/v) ethanol or distilled water in a shaking incubator
(100 rpm) overnight at room temperature, then the extracts
were filtered through a Whatman No. 1 filter paper (Advantec,
Tokyo, Japan). Solvent was removed by evaporation in
vacuo, and the dried extract was then obtained. The dried
extracts were dissolved in DMSO at concentration of
50 mg/mL for experiments. The dissolved extracts were
diluted with DMSO when needed.
Total phenolic content (TPC) TPC was determined by
a modified method of Gutfinger (14). Each extract
(1.0 mL) was mixed with 1.0 mL of 2% Na2CO3 and then
the mixture was allowed to stand at room temperature for
3 min. After addition 0.2 mL of 50% Folin-Ciocalteu
reagent, the reaction was carried out for 30 min. The
mixture was centrifuged at 13,400×g for 5 min, and the
absorbance of supernatant was measured with a
spectrophotometer (UV-1601; Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) at
750 nm. TPC was expressed as gallic acid equivalents
(GAE).
DPPH radical scavenging activity DPPH radical
scavenging activity was determined according to the
method of Lee et al. (11). After 0.1 mL of extracts in
DMSO was mixed with 0.9 mL of 0.041 mM DPPH in
ethanol for 10 min, the absorbance of the mixture was
measured at 517 nm by a spectrophotometer. The mixture
of DMSO (0.1 mL) and DPPH (0.9 mL) was used as a
control. Radical scavenging activity was expressed as a %
inhibition and it was calculated by using the following
formula:
DPPH radical scavenging activity (%)
=[1−(Abssample/Abscontrol)]×100
ABTS radical scavenging activity The scavenging
activity for ABTS radical was measured according to the
method of Muller (15) with slight modification. Each
extract (0.1 mL), potassium phosphate buffer (0.1 mL,
0.1 M, pH 5.0), and hydrogen peroxide (20 µL, 10 mM)
were mixed and the mixture was incubated at 37oC for
5 min. ABTS (30 µL, 1.25 mM, in 0.05 M phosphate-
citrate buffer, pH 5.0) and peroxidase (30 µL, 1 unit/mL)
were added to the mixture and then it was also incubated
at 37oC for 10 min. DMSO instead of the extract was used
in control. The absorbance level was obtained with a
multiplate reader (Sunrise RC/TS/TS Color-TC/TW/BC/
6Filter; Tecan Austria GmbH, Grödig, Austria) at 405 nm,
and the ABTS radical scavenging activity was calculated
by the following formula:
ABTS radical scavenging activity (%)
=[1−(Abssample/Abscontrol)]×100
Reducing power (RP) RP was determined according to
the method of Oyaizu (16). Extracts in DMSO (1.0 mL),
sodium phosphate buffer (1 mL, 0.2 M, pH 6.6), and
potassium ferricyanide (1.0 mL, 10 mg/mL) were mixed
and incubated at 50oC for 20 min. Trichloroacetic acid
(1.0 mL, 100 mg/mL) was added to the mixture followed
by centrifuged at 12,000×g for 5 min. The supernatant
(1.0 mL) was mixed with distilled water (1.0 mL) and
ferric chloride (0.1 mL, 1.0 mg/mL), and then its absorbance
was measured at 700 nm.
Tyrosinase inhibitory activity Tyrosinase inhibitory
activity was determined using the method described by
Vanni et al. (17). All extracts were dissolved in DMSO at
50 mg/mL concentration and then diluted to 100 µg/mL
concentrations with DMSO. Each diluted extract (100 µL)
was mixed with 140 µL of 0.05 mM sodium phosphate
buffer (pH 6.8) in a 96-well plate and then 40 µL of
1.5 mM L-tyrosine solution and 20 µL of mushroom
tyrosinase (1,500 units/mL) were added into a 96-well
plate. The test mixture (300 µL) was mixed well and
incubated at 37ºC for 30 min. DMSO instead of the extract
was used in control. The absorbance level was obtained
with a multiplate reader at 492 nm, and the % inhibition of
tyrosinase activity was calculated by the following
formula:
Inhibition (%)
=[1−(Abssample/Abscontrol)]×100
Statistical analysis All measurements were done in
triplicate, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted
according to the procedure of the general linear model
Antioxidant Activity of Cherry 341
using SAS software (SAS Institute, NC, USA). Student-
Newman-Keul’s multiple range tests were used to compare
the significant differences of the mean value among
treatments (p<0.05).
Results and Discussion
Extraction yield and TPC of cherry extracts The
extraction yields of ethanol and water extract according to
parts of cherry were shown in Table 1. Flesh part showed
high yield regardless of extracting solvent, followed by
fruit, leaf, and flower parts. Extraction yields of branch and
seed parts were relatively low.
Phenolic compounds are very important components in
plants because of their radical scavenging ability due to
their hydroxyl groups (18). TPC of each extract (at
concentration of 1 mg/mL) was expressed in Table 2.
Overall, in same cherry parts, the ethanol extracts possessed
significantly (p<0.05) higher TPC than the water extracts.
It’s noticeable that ethanol extracts of branch and leaf
(110.48±0.48 and 121.41±0.53 mg GAE/g, respectively)
showed 3.8 and 11.3 times of TPC than water extracts of
branch and leaf (29.05±0.23 and 10.75±0.55 mg GAE/g,
respectively). In our previous study (11), ethanol extract of
cherry blossom also showed higher TPC than water extract.
Branch, flower, and leaf parts showed higher TPC than
flesh, fruit, and seed parts. Especially, the highest TPC was
detected in ethanol extract of leaf (121.41±0.53 mg GAE/
g). The results indicated that ethanol soluble phenolic
compounds are abundant in leaf, branch, and flower parts
of cherry. Phenolic acids such as chlorogenic, neochlorogenic,
p-hydroxybenzoic, p-coumaric, and caffeic acids were
identified in cherry wines (19).
DPPH radical scavenging activity Antioxidant activity
of the cherry extracts was analyzed by measuring DPPH
radical scavenging activity. DPPH radical scavenging
activity was determined at 50, 100, 500, and 1,000 µg/mL
concentration of each extract, and IC50 values, the
concentration required for scavenging 50% of DPPH
radicals, of the extracts was compared with that of L-
ascorbic acid (IC50=26.90±0.15 µg/mL) used as the
positive control in this study (Table 3). DPPH radical
scavenging activity of the extracts showed similar pattern
with TPC, which means the extract possessed higher TPC
has lower IC50 value, which is stronger DPPH radical
scavenging activity. For example, the ethanol extract of
cherry leaf, which has the highest TPC, showed the lowest
IC50 (78.87±10.73 µg/mL) for DPPH radical scavenging
activity. IC50 of ethanol extract of cherry leaf was lower
than that of ascorbic acid, however, it might be significant
antioxidant activity because L-ascorbic acid was a purified
single compound while the extracts was mixture of crude
various compounds. In same cherry parts, DPPH radical
scavenging activities of the ethanol extracts were higher
than those of water extracts. Sun and Ho (20) reported a
significant correlation between DPPH radical scavenging
activity and TPC of buckwheat extracts. Linear regression
analyses between IC50 values for DPPH radical scavenging
activity and TPC showed a good correlation (r2=0.896;
p<0.05). This correlation suggests that phenolic compounds
in the cherry extracts may contribute to DPPH radical
Table 1. Extraction yield of extracts from several parts oforiental cherry (unit: %1))
Parts of cherryExtraction solvent
Ethanol Water
Branch 05.5 02.5
Flesh 72.5 80.0
Flower 27.0 16.0
Fruit 51.0 47.4
Leaf 27.6 22.5
Seed 06.7 13.3
1)Yield (%)=(extract weight/dry weight)×100
Table 2. Total phenolic contents of extracts from several partsof oriental cherry (unit: mg GAE/g)
Parts of cherryExtraction solvent
Ethanol Water
Branch 110.48±0.48b1) 29.05±0.23b
Flesh 020.96±0.90d 08.13±0.08d
Flower 084.66±1.01c 55.85±1.15a
Fruit 008.63±0.41e 06.72±0.12e
Leaf 121.41±0.53a 10.75±0.55c
Seed 008.00±0.88e 05.43±0.27f
1)All measurements were done in triplicate, and all values aremean±SD; a-fDifferent letters within a column are significantlydifferent (p<0.05).
Table 3. DPPH radical scavenging activity of ethanol andwater extracts from several parts of oriental cherry
(unit: IC501))
Parts of cherryExtraction solvent
Ethanol Water
Branch 0,222.00±12.66b2) 1,376.00±39.83c
Flesh 1,194.00±4.38d 3,208.53±52.75d
Flower 0,406.45±10.73c 0,494.97±60.01a
Fruit 2,376.00±16.90e 3,797.22±72.77e
Leaf 00,78.87±10.73a 0,941.07±46.92b
Seed 4,995.00±343.50f 9,260.00±397.60f
Ascorbic acid 26.90±0.15
1)IC50 (µg/mL), concentration for scavenging 50% of DPPH radicals2)All measurements were done in triplicate, and all values aremean±SD; a-fDifferent letters within a column are significantlydifferent (p<0.05).
342 Park et al.
scavenging activity. Yook et al. (21) have reported that
cherry fruits showed strong antioxidant activity, however,
they did not compare the activity between parts of cherry.
ABTS radical scavenging activity Another stable free
radical cation, ABTS, was used to evaluate antioxidant
activity of the cherry extracts. The ABTS radical scavenging
activity of the cherry extracts was shown as IC50 values
(Table 4). As like as DPPH radical scavenging activity, the
ethanol and water extracts of branch part showed lower
IC50 values (202.50±15.14 and 401.29±12.66 µg/mL,
respectively), whereas IC50 of L-ascorbic acid was 18.81±
0.57 µg/mL. Regardless of extraction solvents, cherry fruit
showed higher IC50 values. In the case of guava, the
extracts of branch and leaf also showed relatively higher
antioxidant activity that those of fruit and seed (22),
however, it has still not been elucidated how and why
branch and leaf contains high amounts of phenolics and
high antioxidant activity.
Reducing power (RP) The power of certain antioxidants
is associated with their RP (23). The reducing capacity of
a compound may serve as a significant indictor of its
potential antioxidant activity (24). The reducing properties
are generally associated with the presence of reductones
(25). It is reported that the antioxidant action of reductones
is based on the breaking of the free radical chain by
donating a hydrogen atom, or reacting with certain precursors
of peroxide to prevent peroxide formation (26). RP was
expressed as IC50 (the values indicate 0.5 increase of
optical density) values (Table 5). Except seed part, the
other parts showed stronger RP in ethanol that in water
extracts. The highest RP was found in ethanol extracts of
leaf (IC50=210.75±13.54 µg/mL) followed by branch (IC50
=222.56±10.17 µg/mL). A significant linear correlation
was observed between RP and TPC (r2=0.852; p<0.05).
Tyrosinase inhibitory activity Tyrosinase inhibitory
activities of the cherry extracts (at 100 µg/mL) and arbutin
(at 1,000 µg/mL) were shown in Table 6. The highest
tyrosinase inhibitory activity of cherry was found to be
63.39±0.02% for ethanol extract of leaf. There was no
dramatic difference of tyrosinase inhibitory activities
according to parts of cherry as like as antioxidant activities.
When considering result of arbutin (49.88±3.62%), the
positive control, tyrosinase inhibitory activity of cherry
parts was significantly high because the concentration of
extracts used was only 10% of that of arbutin. It is
noteworthy that the water extracts of flesh and fruit, which
possessed relatively lower antioxidant activities, showed
higher tyrosinase inhibitory activity than the other extracts
except ethanol extract of leaf, indicating that different
compounds in the extracts might be responsible for
antioxidant or tyrosinase inhibitory activity.
This study was the first attempt to evaluate antioxidant
and tyrosinase inhibitory activities of oriental cherry
Table 4. ABTS radical scavenging activity of ethanol andwater extracts from several parts of oriental cherry
(unit: IC501))
Parts of cherryExtraction solvent
Ethanol Water
Branch 00,202.50±15.14b2) 0,401.29±12.66b
Flesh 03,772.91±310.32d 2,884.98±29.70d
Flower 01,420.11±122.93c 0,454.41±11.68c
Fruit 12,301.18±859.03e 7,144.91±359.40e
Leaf 01,261.51±352.87a 2,724.42±782.53a
Seed 03,971.90±997.50f 1,745.96±420.10f
Ascorbic acid 18.81±0.57
1)IC50 (µg/mL), concentration required for inhibiting 50% of activity2)All measurements were done in triplicate, and all values aremean±SD; a-fDifferent letters within a column are significantlydifferent (p<0.05).
Table 5. Reducing power of ethanol and water extracts fromseveral parts of oriental cherry (unit: IC50
1))
Parts of cherryExtraction solvent
Ethanol Water
Branch 0,222.56±10.17b2) 1,413.00±8.11b
Flesh 1,401.00±29.87d 2,167.50±10.52d
Flower 00,399.1±17.36c 0,446.43±26.29c
Fruit 4,371.00±30.41e 4,833.00±80.75e
Leaf 0,210.75±13.54a 2,182.00±10.91a
Seed 4,144.00±16.70f 2,054.00±19.70f
Ascorbic acid 24.01±0.15
1)IC50 (µg/mL), concentration for increasing 0.5 value in opticaldensity
2)All measurements were done in triplicate, and all values aremean±SD; a-fDifferent letters within a column are significantlydifferent (p<0.05).
Table 6. Tyrosinase inhibitory activity of ethanol and waterextracts from several parts of oriental cherry (unit: %)
Parts of cherry1)Extraction solvent
Ethanol Water
Branch 041.33±0.00e2) 40.31±0.02d
Flesh 40.63±0.01f 53.00±0.04b
Flower 50.19±0.01b 50.77±0.01c
Fruit 45.15±0.01c 58.16±0.01a
Leaf 63.39±0.02a 39.03±0.01e
Seed 41.45±0.01d 35.40±0.01f
Arbutin 49.88±3.62
1)Tyrosinase inhibitory activity of the extracts of cherry parts wasdetermined at the concentration of 100 µg/mL, whereas arbutin wasat 1,000 µg/mL.
2)All measurements were done in triplicate, and all values aremean±SD; a-fDifferent letters within a column are significantlydifferent (p<0.05).
Antioxidant Activity of Cherry 343
according to parts. For practical application of the results to
food and cosmetic industries, ethanol and water were used
for preparing the extracts. The ethanol extracts of branch as
well as leaf might be a strong candidate with antioxidant
activity. The ethanol extract of leaf also had powerful
tyrosinase inhibitory activity. Further researches on the
identification of valuable compounds of oriental cherry
will be needed.
Acknowledgments This study is supported by a research
grant from Kyungnam University, Korea, in 2012.
References
1. Romano AD, Serviddio G, de Matthaeis A, Bellanti F, VendemialeG. Oxidative stress and aging. J. Nephrol. 15: S29-S36 (2010)
2. Imaida K, Fukushima S, Shirui T, Ohtani M, Nakanishi K, Ito N.Promoting activities of butylated hydroxyanisole and butylatedhydroxytoluene on 2-stage urinary bladder carcinogenesis andinhibition of γ-glutamyl transpepidase-positive foci development inthe liver of rats. Carcinogenesis 4: 895-899 (1983)
3. Škerget M, Kotnik P, Hadolin M, Hraš AR, Simoniè M, Knez Ž.Phenols, proanthocyanidins, flavones, and flavonols in some plantmaterials and their antioxidant activities. Food Chem. 89: 191-198(2005)
4. du Toit R, Volsteedt Y, Apostolides Z. Comparison of the antioxidantcontent of fruits, vegetables, and teas measured as vitamin Cequivalents. Toxicology 166: 63-69 (2001)
5. Turkmen N, Sari F, Velioglu YS. The effect of cooking methods ontotal phenolics and antioxidant activity of selected green vegetables.Food Chem. 93: 713-718 (2005)
6. Espin JC, Wichers HJ. Effect of captopril on mushroom tyrosinaseactivity in vitro. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1544: 289-300 (2001)
7. Xu Y, Stokes AH, Freeman WM, Kumer SC, Vogt BA, Vrana KE.Tyrosinase mRNA is expressed in human substantia nigra. Mol.Brain Res. 45: 159-162 (1997)
8. Shimizu K, Kondo R, Sakai K. Inhibition of tyrosinase byflavonoids, stilbenes, and related 4-substituted resorcinols:Structure-activity investigations. Planta Med. 66: 11-15 (2000)
9. Kim TJ. Korea Resource Plants. Seoul National UniversityPublisher, Seoul, Korea. p. 171 (1996)
10. Kim JG. Illustrated Natural Drugs Encyclopedia. Namsandang
Press, Seoul, Korea. p. 437 (1997)11. Lee BB, Cha MR, Kim SY, Park EJ, Park HR, Lee SC. Antioxidant
and anticancer activity of extracts of cherry (Prunus serrulata var.spontanea) blossoms. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 62: 79-84 (2007)
12. Jung HA, Kim AR, Chung HY, Choi JS. In vitro antioxidant activityof some selected Prunus species in Korea. Arch. Pham. Res. 25:865-872 (2002)
13. Jung HA, Chung HY, Jung JH, Choi JS. A new pentacyclictriterpenoid glucoside from Prunus serrulata var. spontanea. Chem.Pharm. Bull. 52: 157-159 (2004)
14. Gutfinger T. Polyphenols in olive oils. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 58:966-968 (1981)
15. Muller HE. Detection of hydrogen peroxide produced bymicroorganism on ABTS-peroxidase medium. ZBL Bakt. -Int. J.Med. M. 259: 151-158 (1985)
16. Oyaizu M. Studies on product of browning reaction prepared fromglucose amine. Jpn. J. Nutr. 44: 307-315 (1986)
17. Vanni A, Gastaldi D, Giunata G. Kinetic investigations on thedouble enzymatic activity of the tyrosinase mushroom. Ann. Chim.-Rome 80: 35-60 (1990)
18. Hatano T, Edamatsu R, Hiramatsu M, More A, Fujita Y, Yasuhara T,Yoshida T, Okuda T. Effect of interaction of tannins with co-existingsubstances. VI. Effects of tannins and related polyphenols onsuperoxide anion radical, and on DPPH radical. Chem. Pharm. Bull.37: 2016-2021 (1989)
19. Sun SY, Jiang WG, Zhao YP. Evaluation of different Saccharomycescerevisiae strains on the profile of volatile compounds andpolyphenols in cherry wines. Food Chem. 127: 547-555 (2011)
20. Sun T, Ho CT. Antioxidant activities of buckwheat extracts. FoodChem. 90: 743-749 (2005)
21. Yook HS, Kim KH, Park JE, Shin HJ. Antioxidative and antiviralproperties of flowering cherry fruits (Prunus serrulata L. var.spontanea). Am. J. Chin. Med. 38: 937-948 (2010)
22. You DH, Park JW, Yuk HG, Lee SC. Antioxidant and tyrosinaseinhibitory activities of different parts of guava (Psidium guajava L.).Food Sci. Biotechnol. 20: 1095-1100 (2011)
23. Jayaprakasha GK, Singh RP, Sakariah KK. Antioxidant activity ofgrape seed (Vitis vinifera) extracts on peroxidation models in vitro.J. Food Sci. 73: 285-290 (2001)
24. Meir S, Kanner J, Akiri B, Hadas SP. Determination and involvementof aqueous reducing compounds in oxidative defense systems ofvarious senescing leaves. J. Agr. Food Chem. 43: 1813-1815 (1995)
25. Duh PD. Antioxidant activity of burdock (Arctium lappa Linné): Itsscavenging effect on free-radical and active oxygen. J. Am. OilChem. Soc. 75: 455-461 (1998)
26. Gordon MF. The mechanism of antioxidant action in vitro. pp. 1-18.In: Food Antioxidants. Hudson BJF (ed). Elsevier Applied Science,London, UK (1990)