Answer questions when you see them.

14
Answer questions when you see them. What are the factors we attribute to a late arriving date?

description

Answer questions when you see them. What are the factors we attribute to a late arriving date?. Attribution. How people interpret and explain causal relationships in the social world Situational Factors: something to do with external factors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Answer questions when you see them.

Page 1: Answer questions when you see them.

Answer questions when you see them.

What are the factors we attribute

to a late arriving date?

Page 2: Answer questions when you see them.

Attribution

How people interpret and explain causal relationships in

the social worldSituational Factors: something to do with external factors

Dispositional Factors: something to do with personal (internal) factors

Page 3: Answer questions when you see them.

Fundamental Attribution Error

Why do students assume their teachers know everything?Fundamental Attribution Error

(Handout p. 105 “Research in Psychology”) Overestimate the role of dispositional factors in an individual’s behaviour

Page 4: Answer questions when you see them.

Self-Serving Bias (SSB)

Lau & Russel (1980)

When a sports team loses, what excuses do they

provide?

Page 5: Answer questions when you see them.

When a sports team wins, to what do they attribute victory?

Page 6: Answer questions when you see them.

Greenberg et al. (1982)Boosts self-esteem when we attribute success to dispositional factors

Protection of self-esteem when failures are beyond our control

Page 7: Answer questions when you see them.

Self-Serving Bias (SSB)

Miller & Ross (1975) Expectation

Of success: attribute it to skill & ability Of failure: attribute it to situational factors If we expect to do well and fail we attribute it to

situational factors If we expect to fail, but are successful we

attribute it to dispositional factors However, those who suffer from depression

tend to make more dispositional attributions to make themselves feel worse

Page 8: Answer questions when you see them.

Read Pages 107-109

Be sure to read the empirical research sections

You may work in groups of up to 4 people.A sociocultural cognition learning outcome

states the following:Discuss two errors in attribution.

Use the information from the PowerPoint and your reading to create an outline or diagram that would help you answer a 22 point essay question. You will turn this in by the end of class.

Page 9: Answer questions when you see them.

Social Identity Theory (SIT)

Most important element: explanation of how we are not one ‘personal self’ but in fact have several ‘selves’ that correspond to the groups to which we belong.

Our social identity is the self-concept drawn from the groups we are members of

Once we are members of a group that becomes the in-group and we differentiate from the out group ie, a connection to a sports team

Page 10: Answer questions when you see them.

Social Categorization

Henri TajfelWhen someone belongs or is placed in a

group They see this as their “in-group” and all others as the

“out-group” This leads to group favouritism and discrimination of the

out group Self-esteem is maintained by social comparison

Benefits of belonging to the in-group vs the out-group

Page 11: Answer questions when you see them.

Cialdini et al (1976)

Tendency to wear more of your teams clothing after a win vs after a loss

Tajfel (1978) calls this “positive distinctiveness”

Page 12: Answer questions when you see them.

Tajfel et al (1971)

Kandinsky vs Klee experiment (page 107)Tajfel et al. (1971)

Assigned randomly to a group supposedly based on liking either artist More likely to identify with their in-group, even if they

did not know them beforehand

Page 13: Answer questions when you see them.

Limitations of SIT

1. Describes but does not accurately predict behaviour

2. Using the theory alone is reductionistIt does not discuss environmental impact on “self”

Page 14: Answer questions when you see them.

“Be a Thinker”

Many schools make use of pep rallies in order to get their students “psyched up” days before an upcoming sporting event. At a pep rally, students cheer and praise the members of their own team and they mock or criticize the members of the other team.

Do you think pep rallies are effective? Why or why not?

Use your knowledge about the Social Identity Theory to help guide your response.