熊谷市公民館要覧 - city.kumagaya.lg.jp · 四丁目、中央二丁目の一部、筑波一・二・三丁目、 銀座一・二・三・四・五・六・七丁目、平戸の一部、
ANoteonTrendsinRegionalTFP’shark.lib.kagawa-u.ac.jp/kuir/file/1654/20120327035236/... ·...
Transcript of ANoteonTrendsinRegionalTFP’shark.lib.kagawa-u.ac.jp/kuir/file/1654/20120327035236/... ·...
-
ーJO9-
SovietRegionsRevisited: ANoteonTrendsinRegionalTFP’
KazuhiroKUMO絨
Contents
lIntroduction
2AnalytiealModels
3Ⅰ)ata
4Results
5Condu血ngRemarks
Abstract ThispapereXaminedTFP gTOWth-rate di飴rentials across Soviet
regions and the percentage share OfTFP cont3・ibution toindustrial developmentbyre由On
TFPcanberegardedasanindicatorofteclm0logicaldevelqpment; hence,itmaybesupposedthathighTFPgrowthrateswouldbeobserved inadvancedareasHowever,SuChregionsasRussiaandtheBalt・icstates
’Thisstudywasfinanci!山ysupportedbytheYamadaPublicThst,SpecialResearchExpenses presentedbytheFacultyofbnomicsatKagawaUniversity,andaResear血Grantpresented bythePresidentof馳gawaUniversi吋 鵬 Associate馳of旨ssorofRegiollalScience,Facultyof駄onomics,ⅩagawaUmiversity,J8Pan・Ⅰ
許ate叫aeknowledge hofMasahka万一両ita fbr h適評nerOllS eOmmentS,Sllg野Stions, eon血uousen00Wa評ment,皿dbelpIamh血btedtoProfSadayoshiOh別=mdnofSbh・ i(丸正oT8bata払rtheifSug詐Sdons,eneOllragement,andassistanee
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
2(フ00 -7J(トーーー 香川大学経済学部 研究年報 40
Showedratherlow TFPgrowth,WhereasthepercentageshareofTFP COntributiontogrowthintheseareaswaslarge”Thismaybeattriblltable totheequali2:ation-0riented Soviet governmentalpoliqy,Whichbrought about theintmduction of newly developed teclmology to peripheral regions.Onthe other hand,these developed regions werealready abundantin socialcapitalb11thadverylowpopulationgrowthrates; therefore,thesematerialinputsplayedonbTahmitedroleindevelopment processeshSl血/Ba址kstates、、h也isでeg甜d,tk』papersomewb8t Clari&ed theine伍cient developnwnt pohcyimplemented during the Sovietera
1.Introduction The Sovietindustryis characterized by the co-eXistence of a high
Capitalk)utPutratioandalowoutputgrowthrate(SeeFigurelandThblel)
Soviet extensive growth was not so diffbrentfrom EastAsian extensive
growth duringthe period1960-1990;howevenitwas unusualthat Soviet
growthdeclinedwhileanextensivegrowthstrategywasbeingimplemented
四asterlyandFischer,1995;SeeThblel)Comparativelyinthe USA,the
CaPitahutput ratiowasalmoststable afterthe1950s(Sakai,2000,P64),
Whichimphcitly showsthat technologicaldevelopment morethan0脆et
decreasingreturnStOSCaleintheUmitedStates
Inthispaper,re由onaldiffbrentialsintotalfactorproductivity CTFP)
acrossSovietregionsarediscussed」Aspresentedinpreviousanalyses(Kurno,
1999a,2001;See Figure2),Sovietindustries concentratedin European
regionsoftheUSSRthroughouttheSovieterahThereprdbdbけweremany
reasonsbehindthisphenomenon:geOgraPhicalconditions(elimate,distance
丘om Moscow,the capitalofthe Soviet Union),m山tary or po】icy-based
COnSiderations,high1aborturnOVerrateSin鉦ontierre由ons,andothers
In this paper,We COnCentrate Our analysis on the examination of
diLrbrentialsintheroleofTFPineconomicgrowthacrossSovietregions Of
COurSe,TFPissomethinghkeablackbox,butithasbeenacceptedthatthis
measure renectsthelevelof teclm0logyin speci丘c a托aSThe word
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
SovietRegionsRevisited: A NoteonTrendsinRegionalTFP ーJJノー
‘technologyhasabroadsenseinthiscontextInsomecases,itistreatedasa
PrOXyforthecontributionofR&Dinvestmenttoeconomicgrowth;inothers,
Solowresidualsareregardedasindicatorsofexternaleconomies,mOnOpOlistic
power,WO止ingratesofoperation,andsoonStatisticalinadequaciescanalso
Figurel:NetMaterialProducts/Capital ご= L L _
一■-・- 1■ ■℡・-1L㌧㌢一且\
鼠_、
÷亡SNMP/K
._・一.-しANMP/K
-6■・・しINMPノK
↓BENMP/K
・-・▲●- UKNMP′K
・・・・血・・RUNMP′K
-■ゝ・・・MOしNMP′K
-・■:- KANMP′K
--・》;一丁ÅNlJP/K
--・鸞:- KINMP′K
- >■ TUNMP/K
--J■ ■UZNMP/K
叩…“、■伸一′ SUトIMP′K
÷ARNuP′K
-->く-AZNIJP′K
…※ハ GENMp/K
‾■一事・---- ヽ 甘--一一 一-一瞥■ - ≠- ・、 手 く-〆・- ≠一塁-・
×-一事「・-→←一灯
ーーーーI -l-‥l-l -●_
1970 tβTl1972 1973 187・11975 1976 1877 t978 1978 1980 198119¢2 1883 198d 】9さ5 1886 198T 1888 】989
DataSource:WbrldBankEstimation(ealculatedbytheauthor)
1もblel:SovietGrowthData,1928-1985伽IperCent)
CIAEstimate SovietO瓜cialStatistics
GNP 1928.85
1928-41
1950s
1960s 1970s
1980-85
CapitalGrowth
1928-66 1960.81
QU 9 1 1 3 り一
見U 3 0 7 5 3
1 1
3二ぷ 6 ウ】 7 2
4 5 5 3
Source:FiseIler(1994)
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
ーヱヱ2- 香川大学経済学部 研究年報 40 2(フ00
Figure2:IndustrialOutputperCapita,in10rubles(SourCe:Kumo,2001)
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
SovietRegionsRevisited: ANoteonTrendsinRegionalTFP ーエム㌻-
playacriticalroleinTFPcalculations,eSPeCialbrincross・COuntryStudies
ParroandSala-i-Martin,1995)Howevenbymeansoflong-termanabTSisofa
specific area,We may be able toidentifysome realisticfeatures of technologicaldevelopment(Solow,1957)
Asshowninthepreviousanalysis,reglOnSnearertOMoscowaremore
productivethanOthersintheformerSovietUnionare(Kumo,1999a:Se
AppendixA)TheexistenceofalargemarketinMoscow(SeeFigure3)and
accessibility to the politicalcenter ofthe Soviet government may have
attractedindustrialnrms to thislocationIn this paper,interr(料onal
diffbrentialsintheeconomicdevelopmentprocessintheformerSovietUnion
wereinvestigated鈷・Omthepointofviewofproductivity
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
-JJ4- 香川大学経済学部 研究年報 40 ご(フ(光フ
First,anabTticalmethodsareeq)1ainedinthenextsection.Thedatasets
utilizedintheandysisareshowninSection3StatisticalproblemsinSoviet
O臨cialdata arealso mentionedlThe estimatedpercentage share ofTFP
COntributiontoindustrialdevelppmentandTFPgrowthratesareexaminedin
Section4hThen,inthe丘nalsection,aSummaryandconcludingremarksare
PreSented,andsomeproblemsincludedinthisanabTSisareintroduced
2.AnalyticalModel$ Theoutputisdeterminedbythecapital,1abor,andproductivitygrowth
A conventionalgrowth-aCCOunting equation can be derived from the
neoclassicalproductionfunctionl
Yt=F(在,均,㍉), (1)
WhereAisthelevelofteclm0logyandKandLarecapitalstockand
quantityoflabor,reSpeCtively Di餓汀entiatingEquation(1)with respectto
timeanddividingal1thetermSbyY,WeCanget
Y IFAA A ☆- +
A
Thedotoveravariablerepresentsitstimederivative」Iftechnological
ChangesoccurinaHicks-neutralmanner,thenitcanbeshownthatF仏,K,
L)=Af(K,IJ)andqA4M)=1,Iflaborandcapitalarepaidtheirmarginal
products,thatis,ifFE〒rentalpriceofcapitalandFL=WageS,byrearranging,
1他誌dedvadon払nowsBa汀0(199$)血dQlamiefd(1999)
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
SovietRegionsRevisited: ANoteonTrendsinRegionalTFP
WeWOuldgetthegrowthequation:
-JJ5一----
A Y K L - -αお- -β☆- (3)
A Y K L
BasedonEquation(3),WeCalculateSolowresidualsinSovietre由onsby
non-eCOnOmetricmethods,aSisusualinstudiesconcerningTFPgrowthrates
Thelabor share estimatedinthe previous study(Kumo,1999a)is
arOundO565,Whichisaverysimi1arresult丘omthatofpreviousWestern
Studiessuch asMcCants(1988;eStimatedlaborshare=050),Rutgaizer
(1970;060),Bergson(1979;058),andSakai@000;0.52)InouranaJysis,
estimatedlaborshareandcapitalshareareO57andO34,reSpeCtivelyHence,
itcanbeacceptedthattheSovietindustryhasCobb-Douglas-tyPeteChnology,
and,inthefonowinganalysis,1aborshareisassumedtobeO6fora皿regions
3.Data TheindustrialoutputandgovernmentalinvestmentestimatedinKumo
@001)wereusedintheanalysisforthewholeperiodof1940-1985Industrial
1aborpowerstatisticsineachUnionrepublicfrom1940to1970andin1975, 1980,and1985wereobtained丘・Omtheofacialstatisticalyearbook,伽血oe
属五omt叩 ぷSS芹1触(National Economy of the USSR),and
乃励ostSSSHl謝qndustry ofthe USSR)‖Asfor the analysis regardingthelaterperiod,1970-1985,thedataestimatedbytheWorldBank
四astedyandFischer,1996)werealsoutihzedforcomparison
Asis wellknown,the Soviet terminology conceming statisticsis
di飴rent鉦omthatusedinWらsterncountrieshInaddition,COmPutational
errorsarequitelarge,pOSSibbryieldingunre】iable丘gures Thereasonforour
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
ーヱヱ6- 香川大学経済学部 研究年報 40 ご(フ()0
use of Soviet o亀cial data should be clariaedFirst,in this kind of
interregionalstudy,Only relative evaluation across re由onsis required;
therefore,eXamin血g on an absolute scaleis not necessary Second,
estimations oftheformer Sovietindustry are now being carried out by
ⅥもsternreSearChers(mboniwa,1996,a,b),Which wouldsubstantiate the
needforusingo瓜cialdatainthepresentstudyThemostcritical鈷ctoristhat
databyregionsinRusSia,thelargestrepublicintheUnion,haveneverbeen
eolleeted
InSovieto臨cialstatistics,nObranch-basedcapitaunvestment丘gures
by repubhc have been reported;therefore,inthe anaけsisusing ofncial
Statistics,We utili2:ed the totalgovernmentalinvestmentineach Union
republic/re由oninRussiaasaproxyforcapitalstockintheindustrialsector
4.Resdts EstimatedresultsareshowninFigure4,Table2andFigure5,鴨ble3
TheanalysisinFigure4/Thble2isbasedonWorldBankestimationdata
(UnionRepublic-based),andFigure5/Table3showstheresultsaccordingto
OureStimationdataobtainedfromSovietofacialstatistics(resultsforUnion
RepubhcsandregionsinRusSia)Fordetails,SeeAppendixC(funtdbles)
PercentageShareofTFPContributiontoGrowthqigure4,Figure5,
Thble2・a,andThble3・a)
InFigure4/Thble2-a(UnionRepublic-basedWbrldBankdata,1970-
1984),theroleofTFPindevelopmentprocessesshowsweakemingtrendsin
almostal1republicsAmongthem,Unionrepub】icsshowingacomparatively
higherpercentage share ofTFPcontributionto growthare:Slavic States
但ussia,Ukraine,BeloruS),BalticStates,andCaucasus仏zetb扇jan,Amenia,
Georgia)AdvantageOuSlocation(easieraccesstotheUnioncapital,Moscow,
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
SovietRegionsRevisited: ANoteonTr・endsinRegionalTFP ーエ㍗乙---
PercentageShareOfTFPContributiontoGrowth:EstimationResults
Tbble2-a 恥ble3_a
舟meni白 兎訝b軸n 融和ia ルmenia 彪8も卸n Ge叩i8 0507
0238
0442
07鵡
0294
0.33
1970-74 0454 0605 0588
1975.79 0255 0444 04舅
1980.84 0175 -0206 0178
1950・59 0448 0526
1960・64 ・0078 0222
1965-69 0308 0345
1970t74 0665 0618
1975・79 0引6 0526
1980・84 0.425 0.211
Kazdくhstan Tazhikist訂1Turkmenistal Kazd(hstan Tazhikldan Turkmenistan
1950-59 0034 0179
1960・69 0187 -021
1965-69 0472 0403
1970.74 059 0433
1975・79 0243 0363
1980-84 0.299 0.126
1970-74 0328 ・0388 0135
1975・79 ・1439 -1107 -3318
198084 ・1979 ・2446 ・1726
36刃411798 0 3 4 5 2
0 0 0 0 1 Ky唱iz由n U虚戚面訂 Ky唱izla 〕虚鋏is伽
1950j9 0259 ・0048
1960づ4 0226 ・0067
1965.69 0443 ・025
1970-74 0644 0466
1975.79 0509 0112
1980.84 0.462 0.531
1970-74 -0146 0433
1975.79 0189 -0438
1980・84 -0452 -0881
Edonia し仙u訓ia L如南 L肋uania Latvia Estonia 122191鋸92亜 4 24 50 2
0 0 0 0 0
1950・59 04粥 0459
1960-64 0365 0085
1965.69 0532 0324
1970-74 0741 0595
1975-79 0605 0732
1980.84 0.449 0287
1970.74 0357 052 04劣
1975.79 0245 0349 0371
1980.84 -0542 ・054 -0192
1950・59 0281
1960づ4 0203
1965-69 0055
1970・74 0429
1975・79 0549
欄阻朗 0.497
1970・74 ・2156
1975・79 0223
1980-84 ・0225
Rusda U摘ー冶 Beb¶S Russは ∪血腫 訂1741Ⅳ駿∞ 4 2 3 6 5 5
nV nV O O O O
1950_59 0374 04訪
1960-64 0428 0409
1965-69 0471 0421
1970.74 0411 0559
1975_79 0568 0436
1980-84 0494 0582
1970-74 0471 0472 035
1975,79 0374 016 0052
1980.84 0141 ・0224 -0472
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
ーJJき- 香川大学経済学部 研究年報 40 ご(丸互)
PercentageShareofTFPContributiontoGrowth:EstimationResults
l払ble3-a(Continued:RegionsinRussia) Eur叩さRus由
NorthW感* Cen廿al* Voba〟yad(aCen廿alBbdくEarth Voba NdhCaL闇SuS〕ral* 0459 0577
0775 0608
0568 0666
0481 0684
044 0531
0753 0729
0512 0525 0498
09封 0564 0593
063 0813 0543
Sib81aandF訂E茶t
Figure4h Percentage Share ofTFP Contribution to Growth:Estimation
Results(WbrldBankData)
-一一-・・・・・・-ん¶Oni■
=◆--Aヱeぬ8紬n
◆Georgは
↓Kaz8khsbn
-「生一丁azhi帖sbn
-・△一 丁ulkmni由n
-「生一 Kyrgizi8
-△一 ∪ヱbe毎由n
÷Lithuani8
一日・一山tvi8
‥甲・-Esbni8
十M01dova ↑Belorus
・-○-Russi8
‥○・・Uk帽ine
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
SovietRegionsRevisited: ANoteonTrendsinRegionalTFP 【JJさL
Figure5Percentage Share of TFP Contribution to Growth:Estimation
Results(0飽cialData)
Closenesstothe East Europeanmarket,andlargeportsinthe Balticand
NorthSeas)mayhaveresultedinhigherindustrialproductidtyinSlavicand
BalticStatesTheexistenceofawell-educatedlaborpoolandacomparatively
high1ydevelopedinfrastruCtureintheseareasalsohadsomee鮎cts
Caucasusstatesmayhaveshownthesecondhighestpercentageshareof
TFPcontributiontogrowthThsmaybeasurprisingresult,COnSideringtheir
distanCe丘omMoscowandthecomparativelyunderdevelopedsocialcapitalin
theseareasHowever,theimportantrOleTFPhasplayedinCaucasusstates
maybeattributabletotheirproductvariety Caucasusareasareabundantin
naturalresources,eSpeCial1ycrude o止Resource-Orienteddevelopmenthad
beenoneofthemostremarkablefeaturesoftheSovietgovernment,anditis
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
ーヱ20-- 香川大学経済学部 研究年報 40 2(フ00
naturalthatnew(maiulyimported)teclm0logymayhfrVebeenconstantly
introducedintheseperipheralareas
InFigure5/Thble3-a(estimationbasedono亀cialstatistic⇒,absolute
Valuesarequitedi鮎rent鉦omtheresultsinFigure4/Thble2-aObtainedby
usingWらsternestimationdata Statisticalerrorscont血1edinSovieto瓜cial
datamayhavehadahefEbctInagreementwithpreviousstudies,CaPital SharewasaroundOh4intheSovietindustryandthisassumptionregarding Capital^aborsharedidnotchangeinthisanalysishHoweveち0nlynearahalf
Ofgovernmentalinvestmentwasspent ontheindustrialsector;thus,the
percentageshareofTFPcontributiontoindustrialdevelopmentmayhave
beenoverestimated
AlthoughthedatausedinFigure5/Thble3-aarequite血鮎rent,the
PerCentageShareofTFPcontributionshowsdecreasingtrendsaaerthe1970s,
WhichcanbeseenascomparableresultswiththoseinFigure4InEuropea areas ofRussia,TFP contribution didnot weaken even aaerthe1970s,
indicatingthepositivee鮎ctsofindustrialconcentrationintotheseregions
From1950sto1964,theroleofTFPineconomicgrowthwasnotcritical,
butitincreasedduringthesecondhalfofthe1960sKosygin,s2reformS,Which
Wereimplementedinthemid-1960,s,introducingself・SuppOrtingaccounting
SyStemS,eXPanSionofpercentageofrevenuesreservedto丘rms,reWardforthe
COmPletionofplannedindices,andsoon,mayhaveincreasedproductivity
Afterthe1970s,theresultsobtained鉦omourestimationusingSoviet
O伍cialstatistics(Figure5)areambiguous,butWbrldBankdata(Figure4)
ClearlyshowdecreasingtrendsThisdiscrepancymayalsobeattributableto
OuruSageOfUSSRofncialstatistics Recalculatingthedatabyassuminga
CaPitalshare=060rO17,Sovieto凪cialdataalsoshowdecreasingtrendsinthe
2He took theinitiadvein Sovietsoci81reforms atthebe由nningofBrezlmevperiod Gorbachev’sPerestroikaiso鮎nmoreintenselycridcizedthan払sygin,sre丘〉rmS
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
SovietRegionsRevisited: ANoteonTrendsinRegionalTFP -J2J-
PerCentage Share ofTFPcontributionto growthafterthe1970s,aSimi1ar
resulttothe one obtainedinthe analysisusingⅥもsterneStimation data
(resu止sarenotpresentedbere)
ThepercentageshareofTFPcontributiontogrowthwasthelargestin
Slavic,Baltic,andCaucasusstates.SlavicandBalticstateswerethemost
advanced areasinthe Soviet Union Socialoverhead capitalanda well-
educatedlaborpoolmayhavebeenthemostabundantintheseregionsAtthe
Sametime,POpulationgrowthratesinthesealreadydevelopedareaswere
Verylow,andthegrowthratesofcapitalstockmayalsohavebeenlowbecause
OfSoviet equahzation policy These factsmust have weakenedthe role of
laborhapitalstockgrowthindevelopmentprocesses
Insummary,highpercentagesharesofTFPcontributiontoindustrial
developmentareobservedintheSlavic,Baltic,andCaucasusstates,andthis
phenomenoncouldbeexplainedbyhighproductivityinducedbytheirlarge
ma止et/desirablelocation(SlavicandBalticstates)orpreferableproduct
Variety/prioritydevelopmentsystemsimplementedduringtheSovietera
TFPGrowthRatesCrable2-bandThble3・b)
Insomea印eCtS,OurreSultsarealmostcomparablewiththeprevious
OneSShowninFigure4,Figure5,Table2-a,andTbble3-ahTFPgrowthrates
decreasedinauregions鉦om1950sto1964butrecoveredinthesecondhalfof
the1960s,WhichmayhavebeenduetoKosygin’sreformscitedabovehA鮎r
that,TFPgrowthratescontinuouslydecreased
However,SeVeralcriticalpointsremainunClearHighTFPgrowthareas
areobservedinre由onsotherthanRussiainthe1970-1979totalOhble3-b)
Ontheotherhand,thepercentage shareofTFPcontributiontoindustrial
growthwasthe highestinEuropean areas of Russia(Table3-a)This,
however,Canbeexplainedinthefo11owingway
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
ご()()() 香川大学経済学部 研究年報 40
TFPGrowthrates:Est血1ationresults
-J22-
1もble2_b Table3_b
舟n裾nia 彪e巾軸n 鎚明朗 ARMEN仏 克8もdjan GEORG肌 柑70-74 0229 0259
1975-79 0118 0200
1980-84 0059 0015
0305 1950.59
021 1960-64
0081 1965-69
1970-74
1975-79
1980-84
0968 0552 0754
-0004 0098 008
02(裕 0124 0208
0317 0315 0329
0233 0234 0098
0.142 0.07 0.103 Kazdくhstanlbdhikistan Trukmenistan Kazd(hstan 171DGIK TURKMEN
1970-74 0158 _0023
1975-79 -0008 .0046
1980・84 0063 0191
0121 1950-59
0086 1960づ4
0109 1965.69
1970・74
1975・79
1980・84
0073 0333 0413
0067 -0037 0011
0246 0207 0178
0248 0179 0207
0045 0104 0103
0.047 0.028 .0108 Kirgi由 〕加療融訂 Ki唱iz 〕血威ist訓
1970-74 -0033 0276
1975-79 009 .0053
1980-84 0069 0141
1950j9 0488 .0062
1960-64 013 .0021
1965-69 0327 0044
1970-74 0339 0246
1975-79 014 0026
1980・84 0.112 0.166
Lihuania Latvia Estonia ESTONIA Lrru LATOV帆 1970-74 0け2 0222 0192 1950-59 ‖73 2013 1085
0197 0049 01帽 0234 0204 0255
0291 0288 0187
014 0191 0199
0.065 0074 0044
1975-79 0127 0106 0113 1960_64
1980-84 0042 ・0001 0026 1965_69
1970イ4
1975-79
1980-84
1970-74 0074
1975-79 0085
1980-84 021
1950-59
1960-64
1965・69
1970・74
0949
0158
0057
024
1975・79 0169
1980-84 0.136
Be加us Russほ ∪摘ne Russ椅 〕摘ne Bebus 1970-74 0317 02 0127 1950・59 068 0941 1314
01幻 0202 0112 0208 0189 0224
015 0249 0373
0151 0073 0214
0078 0125 01班
1975イ9 0183 0048
1980-84 0041 .0018
0029 1960づ4
009 1965J69
1970・74
1975・79
1980-84
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
SovietRegionsRevisited: ANoteonTrendsinRegionalTFP
TFPGrowthRates:EstimationResults
Thble3-b(Continued:RegionsinRussia)
一J2 ト
Eu「叩aRusga
NdhWest Cbn廿81 Voba-Vyad(a Cen廿alBbdくEalh Voba Nor(hQ)uCaSuS Urd 03‡沿 0629 0297 0420
0114 0101 0129 0098
0151 0102 0097 0060
1970.79 0360 0333 0399
1980・84 0150 0087 0141
1985.89 0094 0122 0087
Sj血aandF訂East
WestSiberia EastSiberia NolthWest
1970-79 0282 0431 0243
1980-84 0025 0120 0088
1985-89 0110 0064 0028
TheinterregionalequaLzationpolicyimplementedintheconstructionof Soviet socialismforcedthe government toinvestand develop peripheral regionsNew construCtion materials,Which embody newly developed technologywerelnputinCentralAsiaorotherunderdevelopedareasThis resultedinhighTFPgrowthratesintheperipheries,but,atthesametime,it
loweredTFPgrowthincomparativelyadvancedEuropeanregionsCThble3-b)
Lookingatindustrialoutput growthrates(SeeTable3-aand3-bin
AppendixC),duringthe1950s,CentralAsianStateSgreWrathermoreslowly
comparedwithSlavicandBalticstateshFromthebeginningofthe1960sto the丘rst halfofthe1970s,howeventhe“ⅥrginLand Program”1ed by
I仏ruShchevorotherstrategicdevelopmentpolicieswereimplemented,and
industrialgrowthratesinCentralAsi8LrapidlyincreasedThen!theproblems wouldbetheloweredgrowthratesoftheRussianFederation,Whichoccupied vastareasoftheSovietUnion,andthoseoftheUSSRasawhole(SeeTbblel)
Thismayhaveinducedthe SovietgovernmenttOChangeits development policyfromequaLzation-0rientedtoe瓜ciency-0rientedinthemiddleofthe
1970s,aSpreSentedindetai1inKumo(1999b,SeeAppendixB)
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
香川大学経済学部 研究年報 40 20α) -J24-
5.ConcludingRemarks ThispaperexaminedTFPgrowth-rate血鮎rentialsacrossSovietre由ons
andthepercentagesllareOfTFPcontributiontoindustrialdevelopmentby reglOn
TFPcanberegardedasanindicatorofteclm0logicaldevelopment;hence,
it may be supposedthat highTFP growthrates wouldbe observedin advanced areash However,SuCh regions as Russia andthe Baltic states showed ratherlow TFP growth,Whereasthe percentage share of TFP contributiontogrowthintheseareaswaslarge Thismaybeattributableto theequalization-0rientedSovietgovernmentalpolicy,Whichbroughtaboutthe
introductionofnewlydevelopedteclm0logytoperipheralregions”Ontheother
hand,thesedevelopedregionswerealreadyabundantinsocialcapitalbuthad verylowpopulationgrowthrates;therefore,thesematerialinputsplayedonly
alimitedroleindevelopmentprocessesinSlavic/BalticstatesInthisregard,
thispapersomewhatclari&edtheinefficientdevelopmentpolicyimplemented dudngtheSodetera
Ontheotherhand,theanalysispresentedinthisnotecontainsseveral
criticalproblemsthatcannotbeignored:
1)Governmentalinvestmentdataare・uSedasaproxyforcapitalstodくhThe
amOuntOfinvestmentcan且uctuateasaresultof丘nancialcircumStanCeS
experiencedbythe government Theuse Ofcapitalstock datais・if
possible,mOredesirable
2)Assumptions regarding with capital/1abor share also are very
problematicCapitalshareisassumedtobeidenticalacrossreglOnS
3)Thekn由or臨etorstbata鮎etTFPgroⅥrthrates甜einnowayelad鮎d;
weoulyo鮎rourbestestimation8Inaddition,industrialconcentrationis
3AlthoughthecorrelationbetweenTFPgrow払ratesineachre由onandvariousfhctorsis ede山ated,nOαidede飴etisobseⅣedこhence,tIlereS山b肝enOtpreSentedllefe
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
SovietRegionsRevisited: ANoteonTrendsinRegionalTFP -J2トー
notalw?ySdeterminedbyTFPgrowth-ratediffbrentials
In this regard,the appropriateness of the data used must be
reconsideredCapitalflowdatamaybeusedtoestimatecapitalstockdata; then,theproductionfunctionofeachregionmaybeestlmatedindividual玩so
Capital/1abor sharecouldbe calculatedforeach region;丘na皿y,national
economy-basedanalyses,ratherthanindustry-basedones,may訂VeClear-Cut
resultswhenexaminingfactorsa鮎ctingTFP
There】iabilityofonginaldatashouldalsobere-eXaminedAnalyses
basedeitheronWbrldBankestimation dataoronSovieto凪cialdatashow
ambiguousreSultsAslongasSovietre由onaleconomyisanalyzedonthe
basisofo瓜cialstatistics,reCalculation ofdatamaybeindispensdble,aS
previ0usStudieshaveshown(Bergson,1979;McCants,1983;Eastedyand
Fiscller,1995;Eseoe,1991)
Refbren()eS
●Barro,RJ(1998),N,teSOn伽wtbAccouL2dn8;NBERWo止ingPaper
6654,Jub1998
・Barro,R”J”.andXSala-i-Martin,(1995),Ebonomib伽wth,McGraw一報】ユ
・Bergson,A”(1979),Notesonthe ProductionFunctioninSovietPostwar
IndustrialGrowth,ehzLmalof’CbDPamd’veEbt∽朗ユ上垣vo13,pp116-126
・Easter転W,andSFischer(1995),The Soviet Economic Deche,乃e
閥班足助刀ゑ肋8血と励房占叫VO19,No3,pp341-371
・Escoe,GM(1991),励mdr5bl万占f血血g£乃嵐J伽Ⅳ≠血・A助成血
RmctimAn亜扇島毎′月ねncband蜘unpubhshedPhD.Dissertation,
OhioStateUniversity,1991
・Fajnzylber,P,andD,Lederman(1999),肋omiと肋sand7btalhctw
伽血d房少αりⅣ班血上8血Am由ぬa刀d虎e(なカ飽田ちJ抑-ガr血
軸血ぬJ∧bte,WbrldBankWbrkingPaper2114,M叩1999
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
ご()り() 香川大学経済学部 研究年報 40 -J26-
・Fischer,S(1994),Russia andthe Soviet Union:Ⅵ1en and Now,The
7hz2SIdbnin励stem戯叩e点由tructzHihgvd,1,TheUniversityofChicago
Press,PP221-257
・Ghani,E,andVSuri(1999),hvducd’Tjb,伽wtb,C*ね1AαumZLLgdbn,
∂刀d娩e励皿血逝g励c如rr励me血駅Ⅵタ血m腸句タ扇由,WbrldBankⅥb止iI唱
Paper2252,December1999
・Kuboniwa,M(1996a),∧なdbnal血cweih蝕tI柑rCbntzdAsjb,Institute
ofEconomicResearch,HitotsubashiUniversity,DiscussionPaperD96-6,June
1996
・Kuboniwa,M(1996b),肋omjbGzvwthjh蝕twwRusslムJjおtihadtq
GDE:Institute ofEconomicResearch,HitotsubashiUniversity,Discussion
PaperD96-10,November1996
・Kumo,K(1999a),IndustrialIJOCation and Regional Productivity
DiffbrentialsintheUSSR:EstimatingtheProductionFunction,Annabofthe
A段卯dム出血点灯点u戚白月∂刀d励g古物朗刀励打d由vol」27,pp92-101,Apr
1999
・Kumo,K(1999b),軸lぬ出血jお曲加あ打出00加地e∽∬獄丁乃血e・厳粛由
A乃擁よ00血ね酢と血血物びム〟ね刀物出血血塊eぷフ房b≠拙血,Wbrhng
Paper No29,Angust1999,Institute of Economic Research,Kagawa
University,Japan
・Kum0,K(2001),SovietIndustrialI,OCation:EstimatingIndustria10utput
by Re由on,Annak o{肋omjcShdi由Institute ofEconomic Research,
KagawaUniversity,VOl40,pp67-108
・McCants,B.E(1983),An Bhz20mettjb Shdvo{SbTjbthdustzy毎′
RepubDb and物bT Bhnch o{hdustzγ1961-1卿unpublished PhD
Dissertation,DukeUniversity
・RutgaizenV(1970),TheRelationshipbetweenFixedCapitalandLabor
Poweち加地g正月如血ねDeeember1970,pp3-21
・S丘血血,K(2000),肋α血b伽融点刀d乃d∽拗虎打刀el如即よ血塊e
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
SovietRegionsRevisited: A NoteonTrendsinRegionalTFP ーJ27-
tLSStl(Soren no Keizai-Seichou to Gijutsu-Shimpo),Seibundo,Tbkyo¢n
Japanese)
・Solow,RM(1957),TbchnicalChangeand the Aggregate Production
Function,1bTj占wofEbonomiagand蝕dよ毎volh39,Pp.312-320
・Ybung,Ah(1992),AThleofTⅣOGties:FactorAccumulationandTbchnical
ChangeinHongKongandSingapore,inNZm腸avecvnoDdtngAm2ual199&
以anchard,0J,andS Fischer,eds,Cambridge,MA:TheMITPress
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
-J2占トー 香川大学経済学部 研究年報 40 2(フα)
AppendixA:EstimationofProductionFunction(Kumo,1999a)
Here,a Cobb-Doudas production technologyis assumed,and the
equationestimatedfortime-Seriesdataof17yearstakesthelogarithmicform
Becausebothinvestmentandindustria】outplltdataarea4justedtoconstant
1985prices,andata(15republicsX17years=255)arepooledTbexarninethe
difhrences between each republic,a dummy variableisintroducedIn
addition,thedistanCebetweenMoscowandthecapitalcityofeachrepublicis
introducedasaproxyfortheprimacyofEuropeanregions,ie,POpulation/
marketsizeoraccessibility丘)rlaborpoo山1g,etC”Forsimplicity,itisassumed
thatthedistancevariableentersthisfunctionlmeadyTrendvariablesare
alsousedbecausetime-Seriesdataarepooled First,afunctionwithoutthe
distanCeVariableisestimatedtoexaminethee鮎ctsofma止etaccessib山tyon
productivitydifEbrentialsThus,theestimatedequationswillbe asfo1lows,
andtheresultsusingthestepwiseteclmiqueareshowninThblel‥
bgQ=A+郎ogいβ如好+βボe如1‖4+β押測d+β卿孤d叩此d+e, (り
b拍=A+βわ払+β如ポ+β8恥由皿1..1。+β糎d+β恥血叩肝d+β海側血Ⅳ代,悶
Where Q=grOSSindustrialoutput Gn ruble革);L=the number of
industrialworkers qnthousand⇒;K=tOtalinvestment by the central
governmentqnrubles);Re由onl_14=dummyvariableforeachrepubhc,with
Russiatakenasthebase;Trend=timetrendvariable;Distance=distance
betweenMosccwandthecapitalcityineachrepublic位m);E顎rrOrterm
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
SovietRegionsRevisited: ANoteonTrendsinRegionalTFP -J29-
Cobb-DouglasTh)eProductionFunction=EstimationResults Resu.tsofEstimationEq(1) Resu胎OfEstimaぬnEqp)
Variab】e Coe用cjent t・Va山e CoefRcient t・Value
Workers 0565 13123 ★- 055212311 ★★
l【VeStment 0339 8674 ★★ 0327 7651 ★★
Distance什omMoscow -00∞28 3553 ★-
Uk招ine 0191 4988 ★★
Belorus -0151 7323 --
Latvla -0135 4922 ★★ 0051 5180 -★
Estonia -0134 4271爛 0肪4 4748 ★★
LjIhuanja -0173 6315 ≠
Moldova -0144 4603 ★- 0124 5253 ★★
K㌫招khstan -0153 6155 ★★ 0673 3396 鵬
Turkmen融an -0121 2798 -★ 0517 4336 ★-
町WZStan -0251 7630 ★- 0522 3264 ★-
∪ねekistan -0116 4299 ★★ 0617 3738 触
職jikistan -0181 4837 ★- 0592 3打0 一書
Geor9旧 -0164 5970 ★★ 0245 3.751 ★★
彪e巾a毎an -0108 3639 ★★ 0379 4385 ★★
Amenia -0261 8619 ★★ 0188 2614 ★-
Trend 0026 15634 州 002714024 一★
T「endSquar由 -0026 3984 ★- -0026 3餅)8 ■★
COnStant 1186 16480 ★- 129312668 -★
R2 09978 DF F_ratio
叫R2 09976236 62303 tナ
R2 09978 DF F伯tio
AqiR2 0地相 236 62423 --
**:Signi&cantatl%1evel;☆:Signi丘cantat5%1evel
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
ーヱ30-- 香川大学経済学部 研究年報 40 ご()()()
AppendixB:CorrelationbetweenNetMigrationRatesandVa血ousFactors
(Kumo,1999b,p.18)
De丘nitionofⅦmiblesinCorrelationAnalysis DependentV虻iable:
NetMigrationRateinEachUnionRepublic(Calculated丘omPopulationandNatural mαeaSeRate)
h血pendentV肝i血1e: Investment:PerCapitaGovernmentalInvestment HousingInvestment:PerCapitAHousingInvestment Railway ConstruCtion:Ne可y ConstruCted Railways,km瓜m2(divided by whole bmibⅣOfeadlrepubli¢) Ser山伏:PerCapitaSer扇伐Consump也on
NumberofDoctol・S:NumberOfDoctorsperThousandResidents NumberofIもspitalBeds:NumberofHospitalBedsperThousimdResidents NumberofUniversities:NumberofUniversitiesperThousandResidents AgriculturalOuQ)ut:PerCapitaOuq)utOfWheat
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
SovietRegionsRevisited: ANoteonTrendsinRegionalTFP
Appen血ⅩC:つもue2.a
-J3ノー
Az訂baian
γ A仇 A〝 Gec喝ea
Y Al仏 Aγr 加enb Y AγA A〝
00モIl OOヰ9 0305 0608 0588 00310010 0334 0112 0093 0833 0126 0087 0689 0076 0037 0478 0104 0063 0210 0805 0454 00円 0037 (ほ22
0100 0025 0253 00モ18 0052 0593 0057 0017 0298 0077 0044 00810573(‖78 0025 -0011 ・0446 0045 0007 0164 0057 0011 01⊆I6 0070 0028 0402 -0028 0053 ・1862 0009 -0018 一拍馴
Tmkme血ね1 Y A肌 A‘〝
0097 0038 0229 0395 0454 0084 0042 0496 007さ 0034 0棚 0105 0055 0518 0098 0041 0420 0086 0022 0118 0257 0255 0朋〉7 0009 0099 0105 0044 0420 0073 0006 0076 0079 0033 0423 0075 0026 0059 0347 0175 0038 -0007 -01gO 0054 0012 022S OO59 0017 0293 0047 0010 0202 0047 0005 0106 0020 -0006 -0299
K花水h由n Y AソA A〝
0070 0045 0259 0059 0044
0083 0040
0102 0065
0081 0042
0098 0043 0206
0090 0047
0067 0022
0102 0062
0056 0018
0071 0027 0015
0030・0004
0018・0030
0052(川11
0051 0012
0(〉63 0029
0053 0035
0639 0605 0755
0485
0632
0514
0439 0444
05†8
0327
0614
0322
0387・0206
・0144
-1732
0221
0237
0463
0658
1970 1971
伯72
1973
1974
伯75
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1g81
19き2
1983
1984
1985
1986
Y A執 A〝 0028 -0013 0121-048(;0135 01010062 0617 00810004 0055 0059・0004 -0072 0124 0070 0562 0032・0023 0088 -0733 -3318
1970 1971
1!172
1g73
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
19モI2
1983
1984
1985
1986
0093 0043 015モiO463 0328 0072 0033 0453 0074 0025 0334 0105 0055 0528 0047 -0007 -0138 0020 -0029 -0008 -1487 -1439 0016 -0029 -17朗 0035 -0006 -0159 .0015 0056 -3833 0047 0002 0048 0014・0028 0063・2088・1979 0056 0014 0261 、0024 0063 ・2650 0069 0041 0597 0004 -0025 -6016 、0087 0115 -1318 00刑 -0026
Ki辞Zia
Y Aて仏 A〝
0103 0054 -0023 0047 -0073
0035 -00ヰ0
0044 -0006
0124 0049
0011・0061・0048 ・5520 -1107 0052 -0017 ・0326 0049 -0010 ・0193 0084 0022 0266 0084 0020 0237 0050 0009 0191 0181・2糾6
0005 -0053 0021・0031 ・0033 00モ14
・0070 0117 -0027 0085 0014-0035 0021-0010 00き1-0021 ・0050 0093 0076 0036 0056 0024
6
2 7
● 5・l■hJ5 35つ)670 伯52餌20亜亜甜85椚朋 12一132<V∧V l O O
9
0
0
ー0006(川50 0086 0044 0046 0009 -0015 0067 0001-0047 0048 0021
〕d)ekl或訂I
Y 州A A〝
、8601
0518
0200
・4.526
・33.70
0456
0042 -0014 -0033 -0325 -0146 0059 0007 0121 0066 0018 0272 0064 -0009 -0134 0054 -0036 -0665 0067 0024 0090 0358 0189 0035・0¢15 -0434 0094 0050 0528 0036 0001 0015 0062 0030 0476 0046 -00010069・0015・0452 00910056 0tSO9 0051(川19 0368 0050 0028 ¢553 0009・0032 ・3773 0042・0071 1697 0032 0¢02 0054
0095 0028 0276 0095 0049
0093 0023
01ヰ4 00ア9
0127 0073
0065 0014 -0053
0034・0019
0047・0002
0021・0032
0055・001ヰ
1970 1971
1g72
1973
1974
1g7S
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1g85
19さ8
0062.0002 0141 -0025 -08引 0072 001モ1
0042・0003
.0012 0061
0100 0062
0000・007(5
0017・0013
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
香川大学経済学部 研究年報 40
Appendixc(continues):Thble2、b
ご()(丸フ -∫ヱ2-
Lihu訓ia
Y AソA Aγr し血 Y A「仇 W
Edonb Y 鼎A AⅣ
1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 †978
1979 1980 †981
19ち2
1983 伯糾 1985 1986
0071 0002 0172 0024 0357
0110 0064 0078 0032 0582 0413 0075 0025 0091 0039
0033 -0¢1ヰ 0337 0430 0087 0023 0127 0343 0245 ー0429 0045 0005 0110 0073 0040 0555 0106 0069 0645 0064 0034 0042 0540 -0542 0095 0064 0676 0018 ・0019 -1055 0010 -0024 ・2305 0020 -0011 ・0583 0053 0028 0521 0091 001も 0197
Moldva Y A肌 則Y
0115 0080 0222 069(;0520
0074 0045 0613
0062 0033 0536
0063 0029 0459
0059 0018 0298
0069 0027 0106 0391 0349
0050 0015 0302
0067 0048 0718
0040 0005 0131
0037 0007 0204
0042 0018 -00010427・0540
0029 0001 0030
0022.0002 -0093
0016・0007 -0406
0004.0011 -2659
0067 0051 0759
0061 0056 0925
0069 0028 0†92 0409 0496 00710023 0328 0084 0049 0、582 0066 0037 0564 0069 0041 0596 0077 0048 01†3 0601 0371 00410012 0302 0060 0030 0492 0046 00†9 0409 0036 ¢002 0051 0040 0017 0026 0430 ・0192 0060 0032 0524 0027 0001 0、052 0朋6.0008 -0507 0010.0015 -1460 -0007.0030 4582 0045 0041 0901
1970 1971 1972 ・柑73
1974 1975 19丁6
1977 19丁8
197g 198(〉
19馴
1982 1983 19糾
1985 1986
0133 0072 0074 0546 ・2156 0048 -0017 ・0354 0005 -0061 .11722 0131 0061 04(;3 0082 0023 0286 0071 0018 0085 0248 0223 0085 0ODl OO12 0081 0027 0336 0074 0031 0421 0056 0006 0100 0055 001†0210 0196 .0225 0089 0053 0597 0094 0060 0(S41 0026 ・0017 ・0629 ・0046 0090 ・1929 ・00†6 0029 ・1808 0074 0061 0825
Bd肌S Y 〝/A A〝
RtぶSb
Y AソA AⅣ 〕b笥ine
Y AツA AⅣ 0053 0007 0127 0125 0350 0063 0030 0472 0084 0040 0475 0064 0022 0348 0069 0023 0332 0045.00010029.0025 0、052 00610020 0322 00610022 0358 0033 -0006 ・0185 0026 -0005 ・0208 0朋6.0013 0090・0790 ・0472 0052 0021 0405 00610(〉35 0577 0035 0012 0347 -00110032 -2898 00之3 0(〉05 0之04
0108 0095 0879
0073 0032 0200 0小指 0472
0070 0032 0ヰ柑
0083 0043 0520
0091 0047 0517
0075 0032 0430
0869 0024 0048 0347 0160
0055 0017 0313
0044 0005 0117
0036 0002 0059
0034・0001 -0036
0037 0003.0018 0091.0224
0021・0011 -0534
0022 4008 ・0388
0033 0007 0206
00け -0008 ・0.493
0002 -0022 ・13.96
0017 0001 0076
1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 †985
19モ〉6
0158 0069 0317 0435 0471
0096 0044 0460
0、103 0()44 0422
0107 0046 0428
0134 0081 0608
0083 0029 0183 03偵 0374 0104 0047 0一=9
0069 0014 0196
0093 0034 0362
0094 0049 0519
0058 0022 0041 0371 0141
0060 0018 0298
0047 0087 ¢151
0045 -0008 .0183
0039 0(旧3 0070
0031 0003 0102
0091 0064 0706
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
SovietRegionsRevisited: ANoteonTrendsinRegionalTFP
AppendixC¢ontinue$):Thble3a
-」3ユー--
ARMENIA シ10 5・10 厄訂b卸n 5・10 5・10 GEORG】A 5-10 5-10 Y A肋 A:仏 AⅣ Y A■仏 A:仇 Aソr Y AソA AツA AⅣ
195か59 2162 0g悶 0968 0448 0448 10510552 0552(〉528 0526 1487 0754 0754 0507 0507 1g60 0110 0068 ・0004 0620-0078 0120 0060 0098 0500 0222 0粥0 0082 00801366 0238 1961 0072 ・0065 -0gO8 0063 0011 0178 010ヰ 0000 0001 1鍾2 0101 0018 0177 0059 0018 0306 D0510000 0004 1963 006g ・0019 -0272 0048 0004 0088 0041-0011 -0273 1964 0121・0001 -0010 0068 0003 003モl 0102 0009 0089 1965 0115 0019 0206 0169 0308 0071(〉016 0124(〉220 0345 0113 00310208 0271 0442 †粥8 0137 0066 0479 0073 0044 08D6 0076 0020 0260 1987 0075 0000 0000 0043 0009 0218 0077 0030 0386 1968 0107 0061 0566 0053 0015 0291 0077 0052 0671 1969 0142 0046 0326 0088 0034 0392 0099 0062 0619
伯70・74 0476 0317 0317 0865(〉665 0509 0315 0315 0618 0618 0429 0.329 0329 07(S9 0769 197シ79 0452 0233 0233 0別6 0516 0446 0234 0234 0526 0526 0333 0098 009モ10294 0294 198ひ84 0333 0142 0142 0425 0425 0333 0070 0070 02110211 0313 0103 0103 0330 0330
Kaz虞h由∩ ふ10 ふ10 ⅦDG】黒 シ10 5・10 TURKMEN 5-10 5-10
Y A「仇 AソA AⅣ Y AソA AソA A-〝 Y AソA AγA AⅣ
195か59 2175 0073 0073 0034 0034 1855 0333 0333(‖79 0179 1354 0413 0413 0305
1960 0130 -0082 0067 ・0633 0187 0100・0092 -0037 -0925・0210 0060 0015 00110245 ・0036
博引 0115 0151 1310 0118 0133 1129 ll; lll- l 上
1962 0095 0052 0542 0049・0011 -0225 0055 0022 0408 1963 0065 0008 0120 0124 0026 0213 0103 0024 0232
1964 0116 ・0047 -0ヰ05 0062・0077 -1244 0047 -0043 tO915 1985 ¢079 0025 0246 03伯 0472 0104 0047 0207 Cト452 040:I 0097 -0∬10 0.178・0107 0339
1966 0130 0074 0566 0124 0087 0706 0122 0090 0739
1967 0090 0059 0(;61 005モ10005 0089 0055 0031 0561
1968 0060 0025 0414 0045 0015 0331 0017 0001 0070
1969 0108 0043 0409 009100」柑 0.437 0133 005モi O434 伯7恥74 0421 0248 0248 0590 0590 0414 0179 0179 0433 0433 04710207 0207 0441 0441 197シ79 0185 0045 0045 0243 0243 0286 0104 0104 0363 0363 0200 0103 0103 0517 0517 198小84 0156 0047 0047 0299 0299 0222 0028 0028 0126 0126 0083 -0108.0108.1298 .1298
∪虚ekid訂l シ10 Y AソA AγA Ⅳ
A 195小59
1960
1961
1962
1963
伯朗 1g65
1966
1967
1968
1969
197仇74
197ゝ79
198れ糾
1885 0朋8 0488 0259 0259 00g¢ -0… 0130 -0047 0226 0110 0077 0698 0099 0000 ・0004 0098 0034 0347 0144 00畑 0135 0144 0077 0327 0533 0㈹ 0173 0082 0474 0112 0019 0169 0072 0039 0538 0151 0076 0501 0526 0339 0339 0644 0644 0276 0140 0100 0509 0509 0243 0112 0112 0462 0462
1304・0062 0070・0(I20 0065 0033 0061・0020 0140 0019 0087・0031 0087・0017 0092 0033 0039・0005 0005・○帥9 0095 0044 0529 0246 0231 0026 0′313 0166
2 一一 6 2
ハ∨ ∧U
O O
0
87
5
2
0
Y
〇
.
聞283506329133360198356137733刷購112531
〇 .
.
亜祁66 っ‘▲=▼ 一■
0 人U ∧U
6 2.1 亜1153 0 00
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
-J3∠望」-- 香川大学経済学部 研究年報 40
AppendixC(continues):Tbble3b
ご(互)()
ESTON】A シ10 5-10 Lm仇
Y AソA A「仇 AⅣ Y AγA A肌 A〝
1950.59
1960 0100 0044 0197 0437 0365 0110 -00610049 -0552 0085 0080 -0003 0116・0038 0221
1961 0109 0044 0486 0099 0021 0210 0093 0013 0145
1962 0107 0046 0428 0115 0059 0515 0093 0046 0497
1g63 0089 0026 0295 0132 0010 0074 01010016 0159
1g64 0088 0023 0262 0130 0023 0鳩1 0113 0039 0344
1965 0081 0055 0234 0676 0532 0121 0019 0204 0159 0324 0108 0060 0255 0553 0491
1g66 0092 0032 0341 0128 0033 (〉259 0109 0050 0457
1g67 0095 0021 0226 0109 0014 0131 0093 0038 0408
1968 0072 0077 1067 0119 0080 0675 0066 0031 04乃
1969 0089 0031 0348 0109 0044 0399 0096 0054 05tS3
197か7ヰ 0393 0291 029107410741 0484 0288 0288 05g5 0595 0370 0187 0187 0504 0504 197シア9 0231 0140 0140 0605 0605 0261 019101910732 0732 0216 0199 0199 0920 0920 198♭糾 01鵡 0065 0065 0㈹ 0449 0259 0074 0074 0287 0287 0178 0044 004ヰ 0249 0249
5・10
M乱D\仇 む10 Y AソA AγA AツY
3372 0949 0949 0281 0281 0110 ・0016 01粥・0148 0203 0144 0108 0747 0094 0035 0094 ・0028 ・0297
0164 0055 0373 0337 0068 -0015 0057 -0224 0055
0116 0001 000モI
O133 0054 0406
0092 0039 0426 0062 -0021 ・0343 0560 0240 0240 0429 0429
0308 0169 0169 0549 0549
0275 0136 0136 0497 0497
Russb シ10 5-10 〕baine シ10 Bel訂uS シ10 シ10
Y AγA A肌 A〝 Y AソA AソA Aγr Y AγA A肋 ÅⅣ
1g5ひ59 1818 0680 0680 0374 0374 2160 09朋 09410436 0436 270113141314 0487 (〉487 1960 0080 0047 0183 0592 0428 0100 0052 0202 0522 0409 0120.0020 0112 -016モI O217
1961 0093 0053 0575 0100 0049 0486 0107 0091 0853
1962 0076 0041 0536 00(S6 0030 0456 0089(l013 0147
1963 0063 0014 0216 0070 0011 0154 0104 0027 0265
1964 0074 0017 0223 0109 0047 0428 0101・0001 -0013 1965 0083 0039 0208 0469 0471 0078 0018 0189 0234 0421 0140 0034 0224 0240 03朋
1966 0096 0047 0487 0097 0042 0438 0128 0039 0307
1967 0081 0030 0370 0083 0026 0312 0123 0040 0328
19閃 0070 0047 0677 0077 0050 0651 0110 0062 0561
196g 0084 0030 0352 0朋i5 0000 0亜9 0118 0032 0269
1970・74 0364 0150 0150 04110411 0■沌 0249 0249 0559 0559 0615 0373 0373 0607 0607
1975-79 0267 0151 01510568 0568 0167 0073 0073 0436 0436 03810214 0214 0562 0562 198小84 0158 0078 0078 0494 0494 0214 0125 0125 0582 0582 0310 0158 0158 0509 0509
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ
-
SovietRegionsRevisited: ANoteonTrendsinRegionalTFP
AppendixC(continues):一指ble3c
Sibげja訓dF訂Ead
-J35----
∈げOPe・Russb
鮒漉 Y O伊uY O4●K〝 AソA AソY 0727 0083 0340 0420 0577 0161 0028 0365 00鋪 0即8 0090-0859119300600666
筆:regionsshowinghighestpercapitaindustrialoutputin1985
OLIVE 香川大学学術情報リポジトリ