Annual Report to the SCCPSS Board of Education · • Annual Report to the SCCPSS BoE, progress of...
Transcript of Annual Report to the SCCPSS Board of Education · • Annual Report to the SCCPSS BoE, progress of...
October 2013
Annual Report to the SCCPSS Board of Education
Coastal Empire Montessori Charter School
Timeline of Key Events
• 2011-12 School Year • Last year of 2007 – 2012 Charter • First year with new administrative team consisting of Head of School,
Director of Operations, part-time Finance Manager • One-year Charter for 2012-13 granted in Spring
• August 2012 • Presentation to the SCCPSS BoE on year-end performance data • Celebrated successes, acknowledged weaknesses and explained
initiatives for improvement being implemented for 2012-13 • October 2012
• Annual Report to the SCCPSS BoE, progress of initiatives explained in August reported on
• Fall 2012 – Winter 2013 • CEMCO Board undertook information-gathering and strategic
planning work • CEMCO Board & Administrative Team worked on Charter renewal
Timeline of Key Events (continued)
• Winter – Spring 2013 • CEMCO Board continued with strategic planning work and undertook
evaluation process • Five-year Charter for 2013-18 granted in Spring • Year-end performance data has both high points and reveals
continued weaknesses • Reorganization implemented; revised administrative team to consist
of Executive Director, Head of Montessori Curriculum & Instruction, and Finance & Facilities Manager
• 2013-14 School Year • Lessons learned and processed - new structure, new team, new
initiatives in place • CEMCO Board continues with strategic planning work; also focused
on self-evaluation, responsiveness, and growing governance expertise
• Overview of CEMCO long-range strategic plan
• Past, present and future
• Introduce the CEMCO Board of Trustees
Objectives
• In October 2012, the CEMCO Board of Trustees embarked on a journey to set the course for CEMCO’s future by engaging the entire school community in an on-going strategic planning and continuous improvement process.
• What has prompted us to embark on the journey :
– Changes in the environment and demands
– A realization that the current model – the founding school model – has reached its limits
• New Charter being approved – no apparent long term (3-5 years) plan to reach proposed goals
• A “fire-fighting “ type of a culture and managing mechanism
• Vacuum of policies and SOP -as expressed by the Administrative team and acknowledged by previous Board Trustees but …
• No guarantees that performance is repeatable - we knew we did well in certain areas the year before but weren’t clear on why and hence couldn’t repeat
• Feedback from Board training sessions with GCSA pointing at gaps between our school and charter best practices
• Feedback from our parents and staff
– New Board members – coming in with new perspectives
• K. Baldwin, S. Thorne , G . Laws, L. Hudescu
Strategic Process - Highlights
• How are we:
• Going to fulfill the Charter promise?
• Systemically transform our school from good to great?
• Provide a high standard educational program in a constant and predictable manner?
• Going to know we are doing the right thing?
• Going to measure our success ?
Strategic Process - Highlights
Establishing and Orienting the Planning Team : to prepare “the plan” on how to develop the strategic planning working sessions
• Critical step
– as the time frame was very aggressive: have a plan by spring 2013
– CEMCO – new to the strategic planning process
– Role:
• Evaluate the readiness for change: risk of no buy-in, passive and active resistance, etc.
• Draft the employees’ and parents’ surveys
• Compile results and present them in working sessions
• Draft the initial strategies as they seemed to emerge as themes
• Provide communication and support during the strategic planning process
• President and VP
• A larger, more inclusive planning team of Board Trustees , Administration and PTO representatives
• An even larger strategic working group: entire Board, Admin Team and PTO – public working sessions (6)
• Next working session: October 11, 2013
Understanding the need, evaluating the gap and validating requirements:
• Raw data captured via surveys, interviews and direct input from CEMCO stakeholders:
– Board and Administration questionnaire
– Board and Administration SWOT
– Parents’ survey
– Teaching staff survey
– School program evaluation
• Revision of District data and policies /practices
• Revision of quality audit requirements from American Montessori Society
• Attended training by GCSA
• Benchmarked extensively practices from other charter schools
• Solicited input from Charter Schools Division, Georgia Department of Education
CEMCO Strategic Map
Academic Excellence
HR Alignment
Operations
Finance
Governance
Compliance and Regulations
Marketing, PR and Communication
Campus and Facilities
Measurement and Effectiveness
CEMCO Strategic Map
The foundation :
- overlapping and influencing each other
- work to support these strategies has pointed out that in order to focus on educational excellence, we need to realign our HR function and approach – resulted in Administrative Team realignment and new R&Rs
- our focus has been on these two strategic statements
Academic Excellence
• Define academic excellence – the most important endeavor
• Supports the Administrative Team in developing the SIP
• Works on aligning the KPIs and academic indicators
• Suggests policy and procedures
Committee Chair: Keisha Baldwin, Board VP
HR Alignment
• Defined the best organizational structure to support and drive academic excellence – clear functions and roles
• Driven by “tell me how?”
• Evaluated and selected aligned performance evaluation tools/systems to drive accountability and performance throughout CEMCO for teaching staff, Administration and Board
• Initiated talent management practices at every level
• Initiated succession planning at every level
Committee Chair: Liliana Hudescu, Board President
CEMCO Strategic Map
Marketing, PR and Communication
• Supports development of a comprehensive CEMCO communication and PR plan
• Ensures a satisfying and productive communication strategy with families and the community
• Works on developing a consistent message and increasing our presence in the community
• Current initiatives: update CEMCO Board web presence, support Board recruitment efforts, recently proposed two Board internal procedures regarding Board communication practices
• Future initiatives: consolidate communication practices into a plan to align Board efforts with relevant school events and calendar (e.g., enrollment period) and support Board fundraising efforts
Committee Chair: Stephanie Thorne, Board Secretary / PTO Trustee
CEMCO Strategic Map
Governance
• Training of the entire Board – two sessions in the last year
• Revitalizing the Board: PTO Trustee, new Ex-officio Members
• Board skill assessment
• Board evaluation: self evaluation and by school Administration
• Recently passed new policies:
• code of ethics, minimum requirements and trustees agreement
• performance evaluation
• Proposed changes to By-Laws to reflect present state and better support Board operations
Committee Chair: Board President
CEMCO Strategic Map
Finance
• New standing committee
• Provide support with appropriate planning and policies re the following financial functions:
• Generating resources
• Allocating resources
• Managing and reporting financial information
• Safeguarding resources
• Current initiatives: Board internal procedure on spending cap, strategic purchasing and RFP procedure
• Future initiatives: focus on generating resources from grants and Board fundraising activities, continue development of finance internal control policies
Committee Chair: Penny Clarke Johnson, Board Treasurer
CEMCO Strategic Map
Campus and Facilities
• New standing committee
• Provide a safe school environment conducive to learning
• Develop and maintain facility and campus regular maintenance plan
• Short-term facility planning
• Long-term facility planning in conjunction with the Finance Committee
• Current initiatives: implemented RFP procedures to ensure efficient use of resources, updated and sustained school emergency planning
Committee Chair: Leslie Sheehan
On-going strategic domains:
Compliance and Regulations, Operations, Measurement and Effectiveness
Not concluding, but continuing …
• The value of our strategic work resides in seeing it happen in reality, not on paper
– Alignment of vision and raison d’etre of the entire school – Board, Administration,
teaching staff, PTO, and families/friends
• We are here to educate the whole child consistently well
– Clear roles with minimal overlap to create consistency and teaming but sufficient
independence to drive accountability reflected in:
• all strategies
• all Board committees
• within Administration and teaching staff
– Understood system of performance evaluation beginning with Board and ending with
teaching staff
– Clear boundaries between CEMCO Board and Administration / teaching staff
• Change is difficult; best practices point to early champions of change, followers but also
to those who never get on board with it
• Strategic planning has been used as a tool for transforming and revitalizing our school -
it is an ongoing process to which we are committed
CEMCO Board of Trustees
• Keisha Baldwin: Vice President, Chair of Academic Excellence Committee
• Liliana Hudescu: President, Chair of HR Committee, Chair of Governance
Committee
• Penny Clarke Johnson: Treasurer, Chair of Finance Committee
• Leslie Sheehan: Chair of Campus and Facilities Committee
• Stephanie Thorne: Secretary, PTO Trustee, Chair of Communication, PR and
Marketing Committee
• Ex-Officio Members:
– Stephanie Babcock–Wright: Executive Director
– Elaine Padron: Head of Montessori Curriculum & Instruction
– Carlos Hernandez: Finance & Facilities Manager
Thank you for your time and attention.
Overview of School Structure
2012-13 2013-14 227 students 247 students Grades K – 4th Grades K – 5th 10 classrooms 11* classrooms 10 cottages & 10 cottages & 1 modular building 2 modular buildings --- --- 3 Pre-K classes in 3 Pre-K classes in CEM Academy CEM Academy
Budget Highlights
• Fiscal Year 2013 • Total budget: $1.488M • Ended year with surplus of $30K • Met all vendor obligations • External audit successfully completed
• Fiscal Year 2014 • Total budget: $1.673M • Actual enrollment lower than projected; overall budget
adjusted in staffing and non-essential expenses • Utilized cash reserves of $80K to acquire a new modular
building to accommodate growth of campus
Accountability: Performance vis-à-vis Charter Goals
Academic Goal 1: Charter School students will meet or exceed the state or district standard, whichever is higher, on the 2013 CRCT assessment in all subject areas by 5%.
Performance Measure Performance
Target Actual
Performance Goal Met? Explanation if "no" Actions if "no"
3rd-grade Reading CRCT 88% 94% Yes
3rd-grade English Language Arts CRCT
88% 82% No
English Language Arts initiatives designed after
Spring 2012 testing were not fully or
consistently implemented.
Consistent implementation of already-identified ELA needs. Revamped Montessori-CCGPS
Curriculum alignment. Enhanced use of Montessori Language materials. Increased teacher
training and professional development.
3rd-grade Mathematics CRCT 71% 39% No
Mathematics initiatives designed after Spring 2012 testing were not fully or consistently
implemented.
Consistent implementation of already-identified Math needs. Revamped Montessori-CCGPS
Curriculum alignment. Enhanced use of Montessori Math materials.
Increased teacher training and professional development.
3rd-grade Science CRCT 70% 79% Yes
3rd-grade Social Studies CRCT 75% 55% No
The Montessori - CCGPS Curriculum alignment
was not fully operationalized in the
area of 3rd grade Social Studies.
Consistent implementation of already-identified Social Studies
needs. Montessori-CCGPS Curriculum alignment; enhanced focus on rich Montessori Social Studies curriculum. Increased
teacher training and professional development.
Accountability: Performance vis-à-vis Charter Goals
Academic Goal 1: Charter School students will meet or exceed the state or district standard, whichever is higher, on the 2013 CRCT assessment in all subject areas by 5%.
Performance Measure Performance
Target Actual
Performance Goal Met? Explanation if "no" Actions if "no"
4th-grade Reading CRCT 90% 91% No The performance target was
met but exceeded only by 1%, not 5%.
Enhanced use of successful reading initiatives and instructional practices.
4th-grade English Language Arts CRCT 89% 82% No
English Language Arts initiatives designed after Spring 2012 testing were not fully or
consistently implemented.
Consistent implementation of already-identified ELA needs. Revamped
Montessori-CCGPS Curriculum alignment. Enhanced use of Montessori Language
materials. Increased teacher training and professional development.
4th-grade Mathematics CRCT 71% 45% No
Mathematics initiatives designed after Spring 2012
testing were not fully or consistently implemented.
Consistent implementation of already-identified Math needs. Revamped
Montessori-CCGPS Curriculum alignment. Enhanced use of Montessori Math materials. Increased teacher training and professional
development.
4th-grade Science CRCT 72% 64% No
The Montessori - CCGPS Curriculum alignment was not
fully operationalized in the area of 4th grade Science.
Consistent implementation of already-identified Science needs. Montessori-
CCGPS Curriculum alignment; enhanced focus on rich Montessori Science curriculum
and use of Montessori Science materials. Increased teacher training and professional
development.
4th-grade Social Studies CRCT 68% 68% No
The Montessori - CCGPS Curriculum alignment was not
fully operationalized in the area of 4th grade Social Studies.
Consistent implementation of already-identified Social Studies needs. Montessori-
CCGPS Curriculum alignment; enhanced focus on rich Montessori Social Studies
curriculum. Increased teacher training and professional development.
Accountability: Performance vis-à-vis Charter Goals
Academic Goal 2: Third graders at the Charter School will meet or exceed state or district standards, whichever is higher, on the 2013 State Writing Assessment by 5%.
Performance Measure Performance
Target Actual
Performance Goal Met? Explanation if "no" Actions if "no"
Type of Writing: Informational / Area of Writing: Ideas
86% 94% Yes
Type of Writing: Informational / Area of Writing: Organization
75% 84% Yes
Type of Writing: Informational / Area of Writing: Style
73% 81% Yes
Type of Writing: Informational / Area of Writing: Conventions
68% 69% No The performance target was met but exceeded only by 1%, not
5%.
Consistent implementation of the Calkins & Collins writing programs
for 2013-14.
Type of Writing: Persuasive / Area of Writing: Ideas
82% 97% Yes
Type of Writing: Persuasive / Area of Writing: Organization
73% 87% Yes
Type of Writing: Persuasive / Area of Writing: Style
68% 87% Yes
Type of Writing: Persuasive / Area of Writing: Conventions
67% 71% No The performance target was met but exceeded only by 4%, not
5%.
Consistent implementation of the Calkins & Collins writing programs
for 2013-14.
Type of Writing: Narrative / Area of Writing: Ideas
86% 88% No The performance target was met but exceeded only by 2%, not
5%.
Consistent implementation of the Calkins & Collins writing programs
for 2013-14.
Type of Writing: Narrative / Area of Writing: Organization
77% 91% Yes
Type of Writing: Narrative / Area of Writing: Style
73% 82% Yes
Type of Writing: Narrative / Area of Writing: Conventions
67% 82% Yes
Accountability: Performance vis-à-vis Charter Goals
Academic Goal 3: Charter School students will demonstrate continued growth in Reading performance.
Performance Measure Performance
Target Actual
Performance Goal Met? Explanation if "no" Actions if "no"
The mean Lexile Score of CEMCS 4th grade students will be at least 720L by Spring 2013, as measured
by AIMSweb R-CBM.
720L 750L Yes
The mean Lexile Score of CEMCS 3rd grade students will be at least 610L by Spring 2013, as measured
by AIMSweb R-CBM.
610L 610L Yes
The mean Lexile Score of CEMCS 2nd grade students will be at least 410L by Spring 2013, as measured
by AIMSweb R-CBM.
410L 491L Yes
The mean Lexile Score of CEMCS 1st grade students will be at least 225L by Spring 2013, as measured
by AIMSweb R-CBM.
225L 313L Yes
Accountability: Performance vis-à-vis Charter Goals
Academic Goal 4: Charter School students will demonstrate continued growth in Mathematics Performance.
Performance Measure Performance
Target Actual
Performance Goal Met? Explanation if "no" Actions if "no"
In the 2012-13 school year, the mathematics performance of Charter School students will
increase 10% each quarter from the baseline established in Fall 2012, as
measured by the Albanesi Montessori Math assessment.
10% NA No
The use of the Albanesi Montessori Math
assessment was not implemented with
consistency and therefore data does not exist to
measure this goal.
The use of the Albanesi Montessori Math
assessment is being consisently implemented
for 2013-14.
By Winter 2013, 100% of the Charter School students will
measure above the 50th percentile of national norms in the area of
Mathematics, as measured by the AIMSweb M-COMP and M-CAP.
100% 67% No
Mathematics initiatives designed after Spring 2012 testing were not fully or consistently
implemented. By Spring 2013, the percentage had
risen to 83%.
Consistent implementation of
already-identified Math needs. Enhanced use of
Montessori Math materials. Increased teacher training and
professional development.
Accountability: Performance vis-à-vis Charter Goals
Academic Goal 5: The Charter School will use the data gathered from a Spring 2012 Classroom Assessment of Progress to identify the top five areas of instructional need in order to allow the School Improvement Team to target
planning for the 2012-13 school year.
Performance Measure Performance
Target Actual
Performance Goal Met? Explanation if "no" Actions if "no"
Identification of needs; implementation of plan
Completed Completed Yes
Accountability: Performance vis-à-vis Charter Goals
All Non-Academic Goals / Performance Measures were met for the period: • The Charter School will be economically sustainable.
• Each year, the Charter School will operate in a fiscally sound manner as measured by an external audit.
• Actual and proposed budgets for each school year will demonstrate effective allocation of resources.
• Yearly balance sheets will demonstrate that the Charter School maintains adequate cash reserves.
• The Charter School will meet all GAAP, as demonstrated by external, annual audit reports.
• The Charter School will be governed by an autonomous governing board that reflects decision-making opportunities for parents, community members and administrators. • All stakeholders shall have representation on the Governing Board. • The Governing Board shall be composed by a majority of parents of students enrolled at the
Charter School. • The Governing Board will have, at a minimum, a meeting once a month during the school
year and at least one meeting during the summer months. • The Governing Board will undergo a minimum of 6 hours of training each year of the
charter term related to governance of a charter school. • The Governing Board will actively address quality curriculum standards thereby ensuring
continued and complete alliance between the Montessori Curriculum standards and the CCGPS in each grade level, in each subject, for the duration of the charter term.
Thank you for your partnership; we value our status as a
locally-approved charter school.
We look forward to producing improved outcomes throughout
the upcoming Charter Term and firmly believe that we have
both the structure and personnel in place to deliver on your
expectations as well as those of the State.