ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

68

Transcript of ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

Page 1: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE
Page 2: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

ANNEX

Communicating Nanotechnology

Why, to whom, saying what and how?

An action-packed roadmap towards a brand new dialogue

Author: Matteo Bonazzi

European Commission Unit "Nano- and Converging Sciences and Technologies"

Date of publication: April 2010

This publication can be downloaded from:

http://cordis.europa.eu/nanotechnology

Page 3: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

The views expressed in this document are entirely those of the Authors and do not engage or commit the European Commission in any way.

More information on nanotechnology at the European Commission

is available on http://cordis.europa.eu/nanotechnology

This publication can be free downloaded from: http://cordis.europa.eu/nanotechnology/src/publication_events.htm

Author: Matteo Bonazzi

Cover page:

Front page (concept): Matteo Bonazzi

Front page (artistic interpretation): BridA / Tom Kerševan, Sendi Mango, Jurij Pavlica

Front page (design): BridA / Tom Kerševan, Sendi Mango, Jurij Pavlica

Page 4: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

ANNEX

COMMUNICATING NANOTECHNOLOGY

Why, to whom, saying what and how?

An action-packed roadmap towards a brand new dialogue

EUR 24055 EN

Page 5: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

Interested in European research? Research*eu is our monthly magazine keeping you in touch with main developments (results, programmes, events, etc.). It is available in English, French, German and Spanish. A free sample copy or free subscription can be obtained from:

European Commission Directorate-General for Research Communication Unit B-1049 Brussels Fax (32-2) 29-58220

E-mail: [email protected]

Internet: http://ec.europa.eu/research/research-eu

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Directorate-General for Research, Technology and Development Directorate Industrial Technologies Unit G.4 — Nano- and converging Sciences and Technologies

E-mail: [email protected]

Contact: Matteo BONAZZI

European Commission Office: CDMA 06/127 B-1049 Brussels

Tel. (32-2) 29-54703 Fax (32-2) 29-86150 E-mail: [email protected]

Directorate-General for Research

2010 Nanosciences, nanotechnologies, materials and new production technologies (NMP) EUR 24055 EN

Page 6: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

6

LEGAL NOTICE

Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information.

The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission.

A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2008 ISBN 978-92-79-1341-3-5 DOI 10.2777/51159 © European Union, 2010 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium PRINTED ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE PAPER

European Commission EUR 24055 — Communicating Nanotechnology – Why, to whom, saying what and how?

Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2010 — 150 pp. — A4 format, 21.0 x 29.7 cm ISBN 978-92-79-1341-3-5 DOI 10.2777/51159 Price (excluding VAT) in Luxembourg:

EUROPE DIRECT is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union

Freephone number (*):

00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers

or these calls may be billed

Page 7: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

7

Table of contents

EC funded projects on communication outreach and ancillary projects (FP6-FP7) ........ 8

Survey across NMP National Contact Points on communication products ................... 20

Materials and methods ................................................................................................ 20

Analysis of the results ................................................................................................ 22

Figures and data .......................................................................................................... 24

Assessing outreach: measure of the TV media impact ................................................... 41

Assessing outreach: estimated measures of TV media impact ....................................... 47

Overall communication outreach (2009-2011)............................................................... 51

Essential bibliography .................................................................................................... 55

Extensive bibliography ................................................................................................... 58

EVENTS: .................................................................................................................... 58

BOOKS: ..................................................................................................................... 58

REPORTS: ................................................................................................................. 58

WEB LINKS: COMMUNICATION PLAN .............................................................. 59

WEB-LINKS on NANO DEBATE ............................................................................ 63

WEB LINKS: COMMUNICATION VEHICLES ..................................................... 65

Page 8: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

8

EC funded projects on communication outreach and ancillary projects (FP6-FP7)

1

EuroNanoForumEuroNanoForum 20092009

Coordinator: Technology Centre of the Academy of Scienceof the Czech Republic (CZ)

Project Manager: Alexander PROKOPPO: Sophia FANTECHI

Thematic Priority: NMP-2007-4.0-10Duration: 12 months (01/11/2008-31/10/2009)

Abstract:The conference EuroNanoForum 2009 will be established as a foremost European congress in nanotechnology during the Czech Presidency in 2009, the fourth of a set of international nanotechnology conferences organized as official events of national Presidencies of the European Union and supported by the European Commission through the Industrial Technologies programme.

Support Action

““Organization of the Conference Organization of the Conference EuroNanoForumEuroNanoForum 2009 2009 ––

Nanotechnology for Sustainable EconomyNanotechnology for Sustainable Economy””

2

Project objectives Project objectives - Show the potential impact of nanotechnology on sustainable development of European industry, environment and society.

- Present the state-of-the-art of European nanotechnology products and components for different applications- Promote international collaboration and support the development of world-class competitive research and development infrastructure

ENF2009ENF2009SA

Challenges:Challenges:- Provide a favourable environment for industrial innovation to ensure that research and development is translated into sustainable wealth-generating products and processes.- Support EU policies, such as in the Energy & Environmental sector- Promote the interdisciplinary education and training of R&D personnel and support the active involvement of young people and students in the development of nanosciences and nanotechnologies

Page 9: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

9

3

Project objectives Project objectives - Show the potential impact of nanotechnology on sustainable development of European industry, environment and society.

- Present the state-of-the-art of European nanotechnology products and components for different applications- Promote international collaboration and support the development of world-class competitive research and development infrastructure

ENF2009ENF2009SA

Challenges:Challenges:- Provide a favourable environment for industrial innovation to ensure that research and development is translated into sustainable wealth-generating products and processes.- Support EU policies, such as in the Energy & Environmental sector- Promote the interdisciplinary education and training of R&D personnel and support the active involvement of young people and students in the development of nanosciences and nanotechnologies

4

Project objectives Project objectives ::

- To engage key stakeholders, public and private, in identifying the key challengesand impact of the nanomedical field in theethical, regulatory, social, economic and public communication areas

- Provide European stakeholders with a customised set of recommendations to support their decision making regarding nanomedical innovations

NanoMED Round Table

SA

Specific challenges:Specific challenges:

- Provide stakeholders a well-organisedforum

- Identify priority areas for RTD and societal actions

- Establish clear set of recommend-ations to support decision making

- Enhance the flow of knowledge reciprocally between each of the key stakeholder groups

Expected impact:Expected impact:Stimulating innovation and investment in nanobiotechnologies formedical use by providing prudently identified cornerstone points

in the cross-cutting areas.

Page 10: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

10

4

Coordinator: Wolfgang HECKL, Deutsches Museum München, DE

Project Manager: Ulrich KERNBACH, Deutsches Museum PO: Angela Hullmann

Thematic Priority: NMP-2007-1.1-2Duration: 30 months (01/02/2009-31/07/2011)

Participants: Deutsches Museum von Meisterwerken der Naturwissenschaft und Technik (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet München (DE), Fondazione Museo Nazionale della Scienza e della Tecnologia Leonardo da Vinci (IT), Università degli Studi di Milano (IT), University of Milano – Interdisc. Centre for Nanostruct. Materials and Interfaces (IT), Universeum AB (SE), Chalmers Tekniska Hoegskola AB (SE), Technopolis, the Flemish science centre (BE), Universiteit Antwerpen (BE), Science Centre AHHAA Foundation (EE), University of Tartu – Institute of Physics (EE), Fondazione IDIS-Città della Scienza (IT), National Research Council (IT)

NANOTOTOUCHNANOTOTOUCHSupport Action

“Nanosciences Live in Science Centres and Museums”

5

NANONANO--TVTV

Coordinator: iCons srlProject Manager: Mario MartinoliPO: Matteo BONAZZI

Thematic Priority: NMP-2007-1.1-2Duration: 30 months (01/02/2009-31/07/2011)

Participants: Gedeon Programmes SA (FR)Leonardo Film Gmbh (DE)Institute of Nanotechnology (UK)

Support Action

““Enhancing Enhancing public awareness public awareness on the results of European research actions in on the results of European research actions in NanosciencesNanosciences and and

Nanotechnologies through the professional use of television mediNanotechnologies through the professional use of television media a ””

Page 11: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

11

6

NANOYOUNANOYOU

Coordinator: ORT (IL)Project Manager: Yoel ROTHSCHILD PO: Matteo BONAZZI

Thematic Priority: NMP-2007-1.1-2Duration: 24 months (01/01/2009-31/12/2010)

Participants:EUN Partnership AISBL (BE), The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge (UK), Aarhus University (DK), Fundacio Privada Parc Cientific de Barcelona (ES), Zentrum fuer Soziale Innovation (AT), Centre de Culture Scientifique, Technique et Industrielle de Grenoble (FR), Cité de Science et de l'Industrie, Halevi Dweck & Co ARTTIC ISRAEL COMPANY LTD (IL)

Support Action

Communicating Communicating NANOtechnologyNANOtechnology to European to European YOUthYOUth

7

OBSERVATORYOBSERVATORY--NANONANO

Coordinator: Institute of Nanotechnology (UK)Project Manager: Mark MorrisonPO: Nicholas Deliyanakis

Thematic Priority: NMP-2007-1.1-4Duration: 48 months (01/04/2008-31/03/2012)

ParticipantsParticipants::VDI Technologiezentrum, Triple Innova, Technical University of Darmstadt, Nano&Micro Technology Consulting (DE), Commissariat à l' Energie Atomique (FR), Institute of Occupational Medicine (UK), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), MERIT, Universiteit Maastricht, Malsch Technovaluation (NE), Spinverse (FI), Bax& Willems Consulting Venturing (ES), AIRI/Nanotec (IT), Eidgenössische Materialprüfungs und Forschungsanstalt (CH), Nanoethics Centre (DK), Tecnology Centre AS (CZ)

Support Action ““European observatory European observatory

for sciencefor science--based and economic expert based and economic expert analysis of nanotechnologies, cognisant of barriers and risks, analysis of nanotechnologies, cognisant of barriers and risks,

to engage with relevant stakeholders regarding benefits and oppoto engage with relevant stakeholders regarding benefits and opportunitiesrtunities””

Page 12: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

12

8

TIME for NANOTIME for NANO

Coordinator: Fondazione IDIS - Città della ScienzaProject Manager: Luigi AMODIOPO: Matteo BONAZZI

Thematic Priority: NMP-2007-1.1-2Duration: 30 months (01/01/2009-30/06/2011)

ParticipantsParticipants::Association Europeenne des Expositions Scientifiques, Techniques et Industrielles – ECSITE (BE), WindMania Networks SL (ES), Ciência viva Agência Nacional para a Cultura Ciêntifica e Tecnológica (PT), Centre de culture scientifique technique et industrielle (FR), Turkey Science Centers Foundation (TR), Technopolis (BE), Warsaw University of Technology (PL), Heureka the Finnish Science Centre (FI), The British Association for the Advancement of Science – ECSITE (UK), Deutsches Museum von Meisterwerken der Naturwissenschaft und Technik, OBSERVA (IT)

Support Action

““Tools to increase mass engagement for nanotechnologyTools to increase mass engagement for nanotechnology””

9

ENHRESENHRES

Coordinator: Napier University (UK)Project Manager: Vicky STONEPO: Pilar AGUAR

Thematic Priority: NMP-2007-1.3-3Duration: 12 months (01/09/2008-31/08/2009)

ParticipantsParticipants:: Institute of Occupational Medicine (UK)Danmarks Tekniske Universiteit (DK)Commission of the European Communities Directorate General Joint Research Centre (BE)Institute of Nanotechnology (UK)

Support Action

““Engineered Engineered NanoparticlesNanoparticles: a Review of Health & Environmental Safety: a Review of Health & Environmental Safety””

Page 13: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

13

10

NanoImpactNetNanoImpactNet

Coordinator: Istitute Universitaire romand de Santé au Travail - IST (CH)

Project Manager: Michael REIDIKERPO: Pilar AGUAR

Thematic Priority: NMP-2007-1.3-3Duration: 48 months (01/09/2008-31/08/2010)

ParticipantsParticipants:: 24 partner from several countries:CH, UK, NO, IE, DE, DK, NE, EL, FR, SK, FI

CoordinationAction

““European Network European Network on the Health and Environmental Impact of on the Health and Environmental Impact of NanomaterialsNanomaterials””

11

NHECDNHECD

Coordinator: University of Tel Aviv (IL)Project Manager: Oded MAIMONPO: Luisa Tondelli

Thematic Priority: NMP-2007-1.3-4Duration: 48 months (01/12/2008-30/11/2012)

ParticipantsParticipants:: Institute of Occupational Medicine (UK)Danmarks Tekniske Universiteit (DK)Commission of the European Communities Directorate General Joint Research Centre (BE)Institute of Nanotechnology (UK)

Support Action

““Creation of a commented database on the health, safety and environmental impact of nanoparticles”

Page 14: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

14

12

COCO--NANOMETNANOMET

Coordinator: European Society for Precision Engineeringand Nanotechnology (Euspen), UKProject Manager: Theresa Burke, CEOPO: Sophia FANTECHI

Thematic Priority: NMP-2007-1.2-4Duration: 24 months (01/01/2009-31/12/2010)

ParticipantsParticipants:: National Physics Laboratory (UK), Fundacio PrivadaASCAMM (ES), SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden (SE), European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, JRC (EC), Physikalisch TechnischeBundesanstalt (DK), Sofia University (BG), Danish Fundamental Metrology (DK), Middle East Technical University (TR), LaboratoireNational d'Essais (FR), Dresden University of Technology (DE), The Centre of Excellence in Metrology for Micro and Nano Technology (UK), Interuniversity National Consortium for Materials Science and Technology (IT), QinetiQ Limited (UK)

CoordinationAction

““Coordination of Coordination of NanoMetrologyNanoMetrology in Europein Europe””

13

EURONANOBIOEURONANOBIO

Coordinator: CEAProject Manager: Patrick BoisseauPO: Julien Giordani

Thematic Priority: NMP-2007-1.1-3Duration: 12 months (01/01/2009-31/12/2009)

ParticipantsParticipants::Gesellschaft fur Bioanalytik Munster EV (DE)University College of Cork – National University of Ireland (IE)Universiteit Twente (NL)Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus (IT)Institutului Nat. de Cercetaredez Voltaire Pentru Microtehnologie (RO)Fundació Privada Institut de Bioenginyeria de Catalunya (ES)

Support Action

““European Scale European Scale InfrasctructureInfrasctructure in in NanobiotechnologyNanobiotechnology””

Page 15: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

15

14

ICPCNanoNetICPCNanoNet

Coordinator: IoNProject Manager: Mark MORRISONPO: Julien GIORDANI

Thematic Priority: NMP-2007-1.1-3Duration: 48 months (01/06/2008-31/05/2012)

ParticipantsParticipants::Sociedade Portuguesa de Inovacao – Consultadoria empresarial e Fomento da Inovacao SA (PT)Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University Leti (RU)Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research (INDIA)Tsinghua University, Dept. of Precision Instruments, Beijing (CHINA)University of Maastricht (NE)Malsch Technovaluation (NE)

Support Action

““A web-based repository of nanoscience and nanotechnology publications, database of researchers and online forum, to inform and facilitate

networking between EU and ICPC RTD”

15

Nano2MarketNano2Market

Coordinator: University Alicante, SpainProject Manager: Michelle GRINDLEPO: Angela HULLMANN

Thematic Priority: NMP-2007-1.2-4Duration: 12 months (01/01/2009-31/12/2009)ParticipantsParticipants::IMEC (BE)Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. (DE)France Innovation Scientifique et Transfert (FR)Barcelona Science Park (ES)Institut de Bioenginyeria de Catalunya (ES)TecKnowMetrix (FR)Nanotechnology Industries Association (UK/BE)Camera di Commercio Industria artigiariato e agriocoltura milano (IT)Brabo Ventures (BE)

Support Action

““Best practices for IPR and technology transfer in NanotechnologyBest practices for IPR and technology transfer in Nanotechnologydevelopments developments ””

Page 16: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

16

NANOTECHNOLOGIES AND NANO-SCIENCES, KNOWLEDGE-BASED MULTIFUNCTIONAL MATERIALS AND NEW PRODUCTION PROCESSES AND DEVICES

Project objectivesProject objectives- Providing information and raising awareness about nanotechnology among the general public- Identifying main issues and expectations from different groups of stakeholders (citizens, policy makers, researchers, industry)

NANODIALOGUE:NANODIALOGUE:

““Enhancing dialogue on nanotechnologies Enhancing dialogue on nanotechnologies

and and nanosciencesnanosciences in society at the European levelin society at the European level””

Specific challenges:Specific challenges:- To visualise socially relevant aspects of nanotechnology-To attract interest of citizens and school children- To facilitate a true dialogue with open results

Expected impact:Expected impact:- Informing and sensibilising decision makers about expectations and concerns about nanotechnology from different perspectives

- Engaging citizens in nanotechnology debates- Creating exhibition modules that can be used

across Europe after the end of the project

Specific Support Action

NANOTECHNOLOGIES AND NANO-SCIENCES, KNOWLEDGE-BASED MULTIFUNCTIONAL MATERIALS AND NEW PRODUCTION PROCESSES AND DEVICES

Project objectivesProject objectives- Facilitate dialogue about the potential of nanoscience and nanotechnology applications to improve the quality of life and to create wealth - Assess the technologies’ potential societal impacts -Produce guidance and tools for stakeholders on how to address the ethical, societal and regulatory issues of nanotechnology

Specific challenges:Specific challenges:-To bring together current leading research on the social, ethical and

legal implications of nanotechnology

- To create a transparent &trustbased processes for

nanotechnologyresearch in the near future

- To produce a comprehensive communication and dissemination

strategyExpected impact:Expected impact:

Translation of civil society’s ethical, legal and social requirements on nanotechnological research into a real competitive advantage

for the European industry

NANOLOGUE:NANOLOGUE:

““Facilitating the dialogue Facilitating the dialogue betweeenbetweeen research, research,

business and the civil societybusiness and the civil society””

Specific Support Action

Page 17: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

17

NANOTECHNOLOGIES AND NANO-SCIENCES, KNOWLEDGE-BASED MULTIFUNCTIONAL MATERIALS AND NEW PRODUCTION PROCESSES AND DEVICES

Project objectivesProject objectives- Organisation of two summerschoolson ethics of emerging technologies. - Development of an e-learning tool which will be made available for use by professors or teachers in their own courses on ethics of science and technology

ETHICSCHOOLETHICSCHOOL

SummerschoolsSummerschools on on NanoNano Technologies Technologies

and Converging Technologiesand Converging Technologies

Specific Support Action

Specific challenges:Specific challenges:- Mid term: identification of

developments related to the research which is actually taking

place in nanotechnologyresearch programmes and

networks worldwide- Long term: visionary trends and ethical considerations of different combinations of nanotechnology,

biotechnology, Information and Communication Technology and

cognitive or neurosciences converging on the nanoscale.

Expected impact:Expected impact:to contribute in the longer term to standardization of applied ethics education in nanotechnology and

converging technologies worldwide

NANOTECHNOLOGIES AND NANO-SCIENCES, KNOWLEDGE-BASED MULTIFUNCTIONAL MATERIALS AND NEW PRODUCTION PROCESSES AND DEVICES

Project objectives Project objectives To prevent knowledge of the health and environmental implications of nanoparticles from lagging behind the technological advances

IMPART:IMPART:

““Improving the understanding of the impact of Improving the understanding of the impact of

nanoparticles on human health and the environmentnanoparticles on human health and the environment””

Coordination Action

Specific challenges:Specific challenges:To foster communication between different initiatives, streamlining resources and facilitating cooperation

Expected impact:Expected impact:Improvements in the understanding of the potential impact of

nanoparticles on human health and the environment. Dissemination to and recommendations for the respective stakeholder groups

Page 18: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

18

NANOTECHNOLOGIES AND NANO-SCIENCES, KNOWLEDGE-BASED MULTIFUNCTIONAL MATERIALS AND NEW PRODUCTION PROCESSES AND DEVICES

Project objectives:Project objectives:-definition of realistic test conditions in terms of test aerosols characteristics for use within nanotoxicology investigations - testing and certification of the efficiency of existing engineering control systems of manufacturing equipment- provision of experimental results that will be used to develop recommendations and guidelines for the European Commission.

NANOTRANSPORT:NANOTRANSPORT:

““The behaviour of Aerosols Released to Ambient Air from The behaviour of Aerosols Released to Ambient Air from

NanoparticleNanoparticle Manufacturing: A PreManufacturing: A Pre--Normative StudyNormative Study””

Specific Support Action

Specific challenges:Specific challenges:Results depend on

size distribution and concentration, such as:

-Surface activity-Morphology

-Interaction with pre-existing ambient aerosol particles

Expected impact:Expected impact:Based on results the Commission will have the necessary background

information to prioritise and initiate research to develop standard test aerosols depending on the scope of the

pursued studies/ tests/validations/ investigations

NANOTECHNOLOGIES AND NANO-SCIENCES, KNOWLEDGE-BASED MULTIFUNCTIONAL MATERIALS AND NEW PRODUCTION PROCESSES AND DEVICES

Project objectives:Project objectives:- to forge nanotechnology R&D collaborations between Europe and Latin America- to intensify collaboration between European and Latin American nanotechnology networks and centres

NanoForumEULANanoForumEULA::

NanoforumNanoforum EU / Latin AmericaEU / Latin America

Specific Support Action

Specific challenges:Specific challenges:Organisation of

- competitive visit grants for students and senior researchers (twenty short visits of

maximum 3 months duration)- two workshops on specific nanotech related

topics in Latin America, focusing on LA strengths such as nanomaterials & NEMS.

- fact finding missions for key European researchers to Latin American nanotech

research centres

Expected impact:Expected impact:- improved competitiveness of European nanotech industries - access to emerging markets for European products & technologies- contribution to the UN Millennium Development Goals

Page 19: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

19

NANOTECHNOLOGIES AND NANO-SCIENCES, KNOWLEDGE-BASED MULTIFUNCTIONAL MATERIALS AND NEW PRODUCTION PROCESSES AND DEVICES

Project objectives:Project objectives:Foresight and roadmap for nanotechnologies standards Identification of:-needs for measurement tools and standards- priorities for pre-normative research- barriers and societal needs

NANONANO--STRAND:STRAND:

““Standardization related to Research and Standardization related to Research and

Development for NanotechnologiesDevelopment for Nanotechnologies””

Specific Support Action

Specific challenges:Specific challenges:Collaboration between:

- national government agencies that draft regulations,

- National, European and International standardization bodies that draft

standards, - research organisations that feed

standardization and industry needs, - industries that need to produce safe

productsExpected impact:Expected impact:Europe to play an active role at worldwide level regarding standardisation for nanotechnologies

Page 20: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

20

Survey across NMP National Contact Points on communication products

Materials and methods

Ex-post assessment is usually considered a secondary task in communication practice,

though theory pinpoints its crucial role. In fact, evaluating EC communication

developed so far on nanotechnology is crucial to identify future areas for improvement.

Communication coverage has been proposed as the appropriate measure of outreach for

EC developed communication products with respects to the messages in various areas,

i.e. Fundamentals, general info, project specifications, S&T, Applications and Markets.

The communication products have been grouped in categories, reflecting the overall

picture of existing communication products on nanotechnology developed by

Directorate Industrial Technologies, Unit nano- and converging sciences and

Technologies A. Print material: Booklets1; Reports

2; Posters

3; Magazine/Newsletters

(selected contributions4); Project summaries & leaflets (selected

5). B. Audiovisual

material: exhibitions, Videos6/Movie; Interactive exhibition (selected

7); General

audiovisual presentation8; Project-specific presentations (selected

9). C. Participative

events: Conferences, meetings, events (selected)10

, workshops in EU science-museums

(selected)11

; Technology platform-related events. D. Web-based material: Web

pages12

.

1 (a) European Commission (2004): Nanotechnology : innovation for a future world;; (b) European Commission

(2004): Nanosciences and nanotechnologies: An action Plan for Europe 2005-2009; (c) European Commission

(2004):, Towards a European Strategy for Nanotechnology, COM(2004)338; EC, Brussels, 2004, at:

http://cordis.europa.eu.int/nanotechnology/actionplan.htm; (d) European Commission (2004): Nanotechnology

in the ERA (6 annexes), EC, 2004. 2 (a) European Commission (2005): EU Technology Platform on Nanomedicine; (b) European Commission (2004):

Vision 2020:Nanoelectronics at the centre of change 3 European Commission (2005): Nanotechnology in Europe: an integrated and responsible approach 4 European Commission (2006): RTD magazine , eg. "RTD special issue on nanomedicine", 2006 edition; CORDIS

focus n°22 , 2006,– Exploring the nano-world n° 22. 5 Selected examples: (a) Frontiers ; (b) Nano2life ; (c) Nanodialogue; (d) Ipart-nanotox; (e) nanoRoad; (f)

Nanoresearch project scales up for commercialisation. A similar leaflet has been recently presented at ECSITE

Conference (Milan, June 2009) by the NANOTOTOUCH project on communication outreach, presenting interesting

―hands-on‖ improvements. 6 (a) European Commission (2003 and 2004): Nanotechnology (2003 & 2004 editions); (b) European Commission

(2005): Nanotechnology: the next dimension (2005 edition); 7 Exhibits developed by Nanodialogue project, whose outreach has been estimated around 1 million visitors over the

year 2006. 8 European Commission (2004): How can we explain what is meant by nanotechnology? Power Point presentation by

Renzo Tomellini, HoU, distributed in selected school networks in the EU. 9 On the European Commission intranet: G:\G4\PO_Work_Area\PowerPoints\Project_presentations 10 Main events are considered: Euronanoforum 2003-2005-2007 (proceedings & posters); Communicating European

Research, EC, Brussels, 14-15 November 2005, see:

http://ec.europa.eu/research/conferences/2005/cer2005/index_en.html ; exhibitions in 8 EU science-museum

developed by the project Nanodialogue; 11

Euronanoforum 2003-2005-2007 (proceedings & posters); exhibitions in 8EU science-museum

developed by the project Nanodialogue; 12

(a) Nanotechnology CORDIS website: http://www.cordis.lu/nanotechnology/; (b) www.nanoforum.org

Page 21: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

21

This analysis outlines a first tentative picture of current communication outreach on

nanotechnology carried out by the EC. First, quantity and quality of information carried

by each vehicle is analysed (i.e. communication product, eg. video, booklets). For doing

this, the quantity and quality of information are evaluated through surveys circulated

through different groups of end-users of communication (National Contact Points,

Commission civil servants, informal network of nano-information consumers).

Thanks to a survey extended to Directorate Industrial Technologies' National Contact

Points, informal networks and Commission civil servants an assessment exercise based

on multiple matrix methodology has been set up. This matrix reflects the content of

information associated to each communication product, and for each message

identified by each goal. The content of information is attributed for each communication

product in terms of information-points: it will be assessed for each message (from not

relevant=0 to very high=5), and is evaluated in terms as weighted average of the info

content of all communication products belonging to a given communication category,

print, audiovisuals, events and web (more details in Annex ).

For assessing current communication, the following information messages are

considered and clustered from communication categories:

1. Information on fundamentals; 2. General information; 3. Project-(& call)-

specific information; 4. S&T information; 5.Applications and markets

Starting from general survey carried out by CORDIS, and available at the quoted sites,

the following consideration can be deduced13

; still a specific Survey set on the

nanotechnology webpage could allow to fine tune this preliminary picture in the future.

This methodology is based on three steps:

1. The content of information (i.e. info-content) is attributed for each communication

product in terms of information-points: it is assessed for each message (from not

relevant=0 to very high=5).

2. the sensitiveness of each audience is assessed: this depends both on the message and

the vehicle used to convey it: accordingly, a matrix to assess them by audience has been

set up (details in Annex).14

The following audiences are considered: Industry, Academy,

NCPs, NGOs, Nano-consumers, Media, Schools, Educated Public, General Public.

3. communication outreach is evaluated in terms of percentage message coverage for

13

Main features of CORDIS surveys: http://user-survey.cordis.europa.eu/

More information on the size of target audience amongst the CORDIS registered users by the strings

NMP and nanotechs in http://stats-

cordis.mainstrat.com/logs/php/index.php?mode=day&year=2008&month=11&week=&d=20081105&sec

tion=OtherIndicators More information on visits to FP7-NMP is available under http://stats-cordis.mainstrat.com/logs/php/servicios/index.php?mode=month&d=&month=10&year=2008&week=&service=302&service=307&section=Generales (update: October 2008) 14

Its basic pattern has been evicted from literature and field studies, see Annex (CITIZENS’

DECLARATION ON THE CITY OF TOMORROW (2005); WEB LINKS: COMMUNICATION PLAN

(2),(3), (5), (9), (21) (26), (30); WEB LINKS: COMMUNICATION VEHICLES for AUDIENCES, (4),

(9), (12), (13), (18), (27, pp.17-19) ), and assessed by informal networks of governance experts.

Page 22: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

22

each vehicle per audience. Then average outreach of main audiences is calculated. This

allows to assess the average outreach for the given audiences related to each message

conveyed via a certain vehicle, eg. Info on fundamentals via print material. This

measure gives an idea of how effective is communication for a given set of audiences,

and how effectively a message (and its related content of information) is conveyed via a

given vehicle for an average of audiences.

Outreach Formula :

COMMUNICATION OUTREACH ( (audience, message, vehicle)) =

= SENSITIVENESS ((audience, vehicle, message) * INFO CONTENT (

(message, vehicle))

Results in terms of average Outreach Coverage by vehicle: overall, each can be

reached in different ways; according to the vehicle used and the message conveyed,

different degree of outreach are achieved. Values are calculated for each audience, then

averaged. All this reflects the communication choice developed so far by the EC.

- Messages: overall, the main messages of the current communication activities are

expected to be focussed on Project/Call-specific info, Applications & Markets and

S&T info, while General information is slightly less and Fundamentals is by far the less

represented.

- Vehicles: overall, Print material and Webs are expected to be the vehicle most used,

while Events and Audiovisuals are less used. While Print material, Webs and Events

cover well messages such as Project/Call-specific info, Applications & Markets, S&T

info and General information, Audiovisuals well communicate on Fundamentals and

Application & Markets.

- Audiences: communication addressing schools, media, NGOs, Nano-consumers and

general public is less effective than that addressing scientists, industry, educated

public. Accordingly, dedicated actions and associated vehicles should be put in place by

the EC.

Analysis of the results

i) SCIENTISTS/ACADEMY: Project/Call-specific info, and S&T info take clearly

the lion’s share, while General information , Applications & Markets and Fundamentals

show very little importance; Print material, Webs, Events cover quite well these

messages, while Audiovisuals less: overall, the outreach is good, well equilibrated and

satisfying, although Audiovisuals use could be improved;

ii) INDUSTRY: Applications & Markets, Project/Call-specific info and S&T info

are more important, while General information less important and Fundamentals shows

no importance; Print material, Webs and Events are more important than

Audiovisuals: overall, the outreach is good, well equilibrated and satisfying, although

Audiovisuals use could be improved;

iii) NATIONAL CONTACT POINTS: Project/Call-specific info, Applications &

Markets, and General information are by far more important than S&T info and

Page 23: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

23

Fundamentals; Print material, Webs, Events and Audiovisuals are efficiently used:

overall, the outreach is quite good, although use of Audiovisuals and Web should be

improved.

iv) SENSITIVE NGOs: Project/Call-specific info, Applications & Markets, are by

far more important than General information, S&T info and Fundamentals; Print

material, Webs, Events and Audiovisuals are efficiently used: overall, the outreach is

quite good, although use of Audiovisuals, Print material and Web should be

improved.

iv) NANO-CONSUMERS: Project/Call-specific info, Applications & Markets,

S&T info are by far more important than General information, and Fundamentals; Print

material, Webs, Events and Audiovisuals are efficiently used: overall, the outreach is

good, although use of Audiovisuals, Print material and Web should be improved.

v) SCHOOLS: Fundamentals, Applications & Markets are by far more important;

Audiovisuals and Events are used quite efficiently, although their use could be

expanded; Print material and Webs are not properly addressed: overall, the outreach

should be improved, basically through Web, Print material and Audiovisuals.

vi) EDUCATED PUBLIC: Applications & Markets, S&T info and Fundamentals

are slightly more important than Project/Call-specific info and General information,;

Print material, Webs, Events and Audiovisuals are efficiently used: overall, the

outreach is moderately good, but the use of the Web shuld be improved.

vi) GENERAL PUBLIC: Applications & Markets and Fundamentals are clearly

more important than S&T info Project/Call-specific info and General information;

Audiovisuals and Events are quite efficiently used together with Print material and

Webs: overall, the outreach is quite good, although use of Audiovisuals, Web and

Print material should be improved.

vii) MEDIA: Applications & Markets and Fundamentals are more important than

S&T info Project/Call-specific info and General information; Audiovisuals and Events

are use with Print material and Webs: overall, the outreach is moderately good,

especially for specialised scientific media, although use of Audiovisuals, Web and

Print material should be significantly improved, to reach more effectively mass media.

Page 24: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

24

Figures and data

Coverage MESSAGE by VEHICLE

0

4

8Fundamentals on N&N

General Information

Project-specific InfoS&T

Applications & Markets

PRINT MATERIAL

WEBS

EVENTS

AUDIOVISUALS

Page 25: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

25

COMMUNICATION OUTREACH by AUDIENCE

Effective communication to SCIENTISTS/ACADEMY

0

20

40

Fundamentals

General information

Project/Call-specific infoS&T info

Applications & markets

PRINT

WEB

EVENTS

AUDIOVISUALS

Effective communication to INDUSTRY

0

20

40

Fundamentals

General information

Project/Call-specific infoS&T info

Applications & markets

PRINT

WEB

EVENTS

AUDIOVISUALS

Page 26: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

26

Effective communication to NATIONAL CONTACT POINTS (NCPs)

0

20

40

Fundamentals

General information

Project/Call-specific infoS&T info

Applications & markets

PRINT

WEB

EVENTS

AUDIOVISUALS

Effective communication to NGOs

0

20

40

Fundamentals

General information

Project/Call-specific infoS&T info

Applications & markets

PRINT

WEB

EVENTS

AUDIOVISUALS

Page 27: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

27

Effective communication to NANO-CONSUMERS

0

20

40

Fundamentals

General information

Project/Call-specific infoS&T info

Applications & markets

PRINT

WEB

EVENTS

AUDIOVISUALS

Effective communication to SCHOOLS

0

10

20

30

Fundamentals

General information

Project/Call-specific infoS&T info

Applications & markets

AUDIOVISUALS

EVENTS

PRINT

WEB

Page 28: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

28

Effective communication to EDUCATED PUBLIC

0

20

40

Fundamentals

General information

Project/Call-specific infoS&T info

Applications & markets

PRINT

WEB

EVENTS

AUDIOVISUALS

Effective communication to GENERAL PUBLIC

0

7

14

Fundamentals

General information

Project/Call-specific infoS&T info

Applications & markets

AUDIOVISUALS

EVENTS

PRINT

WEB

Page 29: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

29

Effective communication to MEDIA

0

10

20

30

Fundamentals

General information

Project/Call-specific infoS&T info

Applications & markets

AUDIOVISUALS

EVENTS

PRINT

WEB

Page 30: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

30

Info content by message and vehicle

Information

content

Very high = 5

High = 4

Medium = 3

Low = 2

Very low = 1

Not relevant = 0

INFO CONTENT by MESSAGE for VEHICLE (2003-2007)

Communication products Message

FUNDAMENTALS

on N&N GENERAL

INFORMATION PROJECT-SPECIFIC

S&T INFO

APPLICATIONS & MARKETS

PRINT MATERIAL

Booklets Nanotechnology : innovation for a future world 5 4 2 3 5

Nanotechnology & Nanoscience: Action Plan 2005-2009 0 3 1 0 1

Towards an EU strategy for Nanotechnology 0 4 1 0 1

Nanotechnology in the ERA ( and 6 annexes) 0 1 5 4 4

Poster Nanotechnology in Europe 0 1 0 0 0

Reports

EU Technology Platform on Nanomedicine 0 2 5 4 4

Vision 2020: Nanoelectronics at the centre of change 0 2 5 4 4

Magazine RTD Articles & contributions on Nanotech & Nanosciences 1 2 5 4 4

Project-specific project summaries & leaflets 0 1 5 4 4

TOTAL INFO-POINTS 1,5 5 7,25 5,75 6,75

AUDIOVISUALS Video "NANO: the next dimension" for all public 5 3 2 3 5

Video "NANOTECHNOLOGY" for kids 5 4 1 0 4

Power point presentations of FP6 projects 0 2 5 4 4

Power point presentation for kids: "How to explain nano?" 5 3 0 1 3

TOTAL INFO-POINTS 3,75 3 2 2 4

EVENTS Euronanoforum 2003 (proceedings & posters) 1 2 5 5 4

Museums (eg.Nanodialogue) 5 3 1 3 5

TOTAL INFO-POINTS 3 2,5 3 4 4,5

WEBS http://www.cordis.lu/nanotechnology/; 1 4 5 5 4

www.nanoforum.org 1 4 5 5 4

TOTAL INFO-POINTS 1 4 5 5 4

Total score FUNDAMENTALS

on N&N GENERAL

INFORMATION PROJECT-SPECIFIC

S&T INFO

APPLICATIONS & MARKETS

PRINT MATERIAL 1,5 5 7,25 5,75 6,75

AUDIOVISUALS 3,75 3 2 2 4

EVENTS 3 2,5 3 4 4,5

WEBS 1 4 5 5 4

PARTICIPATORY MECHANISMS Announcement of

the Conference on the web

Applicants to the

conference

Citizens’ concerns & expectations on nanotechs

Identification of what

citizens’ need to know on nanotechs

Page 31: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

31

Communication sensitiveness by audience

GOAL: APPROPRIATE COMMUNICATION SENSITIVINESS by VEHICLE for Audience

Target AUDIENCE

SCIENTISTS/ACADEMY

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 0 1 0 0

General information 1 1 2 2

Project/Call-specific info 5 3 4 5

S&T info 5 3 5 5

Applications & markets 1 1 0 2

Target AUDIENCE

INDUSTRY

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 0 1 0 0

General information 2 2 2 2

Project/Call-specific info 4 3 5 5

S&T info 4 3 4 4

Applications & markets 5 5 5 5

Target AUDIENCE

NATIONAL CONTACT POINTS (NCPs)

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 0 1 2 1

General information 4 4 4 1

Project/Call-specific info 5 5 5 5

S&T info 1 2 2 1

Applications & markets 3 4 4 4

Target AUDIENCE

SENSITIVE NGOs (env, consum, eth)

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 0 1 2 1

General information 3 3 4 3

Project/Call-specific info 4 3 4 5

Page 32: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

32

S&T info 1 3 2 1

Applications & markets 5 5 5 5

Target AUDIENCE NANO-CONSUMERS (medical,

industry)

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 0 2 2 1

General information 2 3 2 2

Project/Call-specific info 4 4 3 4

S&T info 3 3 3 5

Applications & markets 5 5 5 5

Target AUDIENCE

SCHOOLS

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 5 5 5 4

General information 1 3 3 2

Project/Call-specific info 0 1 0 0

S&T info 0 0 0 0

Applications & markets 3 5 4 3

Target AUDIENCE

EDUCATED PUBLIC (STUDENTS)

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 4 5 3 5

General information 2 5 5 1

Project/Call-specific info 0 1 3 3

S&T info 2 4 3 4

Applications & markets 5 5 5 5

Target AUDIENCE

GENERAL PUBLIC

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 1 3 3 1

General information 1 2 3 1

Project/Call-specific info 0 1 0 0

S&T info 0 1 0 0

Applications & markets 2 3 3 2

Target AUDIENCE

Page 33: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

33

MEDIA

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 2 5 4 3

General information 2 4 4 2

Project/Call-specific info 0 1 1 0

S&T info 0 2 2 0

Applications & markets 4 5 5 4

Page 34: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

34

Communication Outreach by audience

EFFECTIVE AUDIENCE COVERAGE =

SENSITIVENESS * INFO CONTENT

Target AUDIENCE

SCIENTISTS/ACADEMY

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 0 3,75 0 0

General information 5 3 5 8

Project/Call-specific info 36,25 6 12 25

S&T info 28,75 17,25 20 25

Applications & markets 6,75 6,75 0 8

Target AUDIENCE

INDUSTRY

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 0 3,75 0 0

General information 10 6 5 8

Project/Call-specific info 29 6 15 25

S&T info 23 6 16 20

Applications & markets 33,75 20 22,5 20

Target AUDIENCE

NATIONAL CONTACT POINTS (NCPs)

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 0 3,75 6 1

General information 20 12 10 4

Project/Call-specific info 36,25 10 15 25

S&T info 5,75 4 8 5

Applications & markets 20,25 16 18 16

Target AUDIENCE

SENSITIVE NGOs (env, consum, eth)

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 0 3,75 6 1

General information 15 9 10 12

Project/Call-specific info 29 6 12 25

S&T info 5,75 6 8 5

Applications & markets 33,75 20 22,5 20

Page 35: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

35

Target AUDIENCE NANO-CONSUMERS (medical,

industry)

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 0 7,5 6 1

General information 10 9 5 8

Project/Call-specific info 29 8 9 20

S&T info 17,25 6 12 25

Applications & markets 33,75 20 22,5 20

Target AUDIENCE

SCHOOLS

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 7,5 18,75 15 4

General information 5 9 7,5 8

Project/Call-specific info 0 2 0 0

S&T info 0 0 0 0

Applications & markets 20,25 20 18 12

Target AUDIENCE

EDUCATED PUBLIC (STUDENTS)

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 6 18,75 9 5

General information 10 15 12,5 4

Project/Call-specific info 0 2 9 15

S&T info 11,5 8 12 20

Applications & markets 33,75 20 22,5 20

Target AUDIENCE

GENERAL PUBLIC

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 1,5 11,25 9 1

General information 5 6 7,5 4

Project/Call-specific info 0 2 0 0

S&T info 0 2 0 0

Applications & markets 13,5 12 13,5 8

Target AUDIENCE

MEDIA

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Page 36: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

36

Message

Fundamentals 3 18,75 12 3

General information 10 12 10 8

Project/Call-specific info 0 2 3 0

S&T info 0 4 8 0

Applications & markets 27 20 22,5 16

Page 37: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

37

Audience coverage

EFFECTIVE AUDIENCE COVERAGE =

SENSITIVINESS * INFO CONTENT

Target AUDIENCE

SCIENTISTS/ACADEMY

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 0 15 0 0

General information 20 12 4 16

Project/Call-specific info 145 24 20 50

S&T info 115 69 25 50

Applications & markets 27 27 0 16

Target AUDIENCE

INDUSTRY

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 0 15 0 0

General information 40 24 4 16

Project/Call-specific info 116 24 25 50

S&T info 92 24 20 40

Applications & markets 135 80 20 40

Target AUDIENCE

NATIONAL CONTACT POINTS (NCPs)

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 0 15 2 2

General information 80 48 8 8

Project/Call-specific info 145 40 25 50

S&T info 23 16 10 10

Applications & markets 81 64 16 32

Target AUDIENCE

SENSITIVE NGOs (env, consum, eth)

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 0 15 2 2

General information 60 36 8 24

Project/Call-specific info 116 24 20 50

S&T info 23 24 10 10

Applications & markets 135 80 20 40

Page 38: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

38

Target AUDIENCE NANO-CONSUMERS (medical,

industry)

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 0 30 2 2

General information 40 36 4 16

Project/Call-specific info 116 32 15 40

S&T info 69 24 15 50

Applications & markets 135 80 20 40

Target AUDIENCE

SCHOOLS

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 30 75 5 8

General information 20 36 6 16

Project/Call-specific info 0 8 0 0

S&T info 0 0 0 0

Applications & markets 81 80 16 24

Target AUDIENCE

EDUCATED PUBLIC (STUDENTS)

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 24 75 3 10

General information 40 60 10 8

Project/Call-specific info 0 8 15 30

S&T info 46 32 15 40

Applications & markets 135 80 20 40

Target AUDIENCE

GENERAL PUBLIC

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Message

Fundamentals 6 45 3 2

General information 20 24 6 8

Project/Call-specific info 0 8 0 0

S&T info 0 8 0 0

Applications & markets 54 48 12 16

Target AUDIENCE

MEDIA

Vehicle PRINT AUDIOVISUALS EVENTS WEB

Page 39: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

39

Message

Fundamentals 12 75 4 6

General information 40 48 8 16

Project/Call-specific info 0 8 5 0

S&T info 0 16 10 0

Applications & markets 108 80 20 32

Page 40: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

40

EC-developed communication and dialogue outreach by product and audience

EC developed communication and dialogue outreach by product

2.005 2.006 2.007 2.008

Audiovisuals 1.420 3.140 3.440 2.240

School material 1.200 1.420 2.110 1.830

Printed material 1.245 2.459 3.520 2.890

Events 23.720 34.115 27.145 35.606

Web 37.200 42.150 193.395 96.066

Exhibitions 30.000 330.000 1.130.000 430.000

totals 66.790 85.290 231.617 140.640 524.337

EC developed communication and dialogue outreach by audience

2.005 2.006 2.007 2.008

Journalists 210 1.820 1.920 1.020

Youngsters 3.410 2.740 3.630 3.150

NCP 1.245 2.459 3.520 2.890

Industry 3.720 4.115 5.145 5.606

Researchers 37.200 42.150 193.395 93.066

Lay public 30.000 330.000 830.000 830.000

totals 47.790 55.290 209.617 107.740 420.437

EC developed outreach on dialogue by product

2.005 2.006 2.007 2.008

Open web consultation - - 320 145

Scientific events 3.372 5.115 4.145 4.606

Exhibitions and events 310 3.121 8.014 1.400

totals 5.377 7.121 6.472 6.759 25.729

Page 41: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

41

Assessing outreach: measure of the TV media impact

Experience shows that it will not be possible to track all broadcasting made by all target TV stations.

The nature of the distribution model, using large feeds such as the Eurovision World Feed, would

make it impossible to identify all individual broadcastings made by TV stations. The distribution of

the audiovisuals will of course known, the effective broadcasting not. Only a number of these

broadcastings, constituting a lower bound of success, will be tracked with the help of the network of

correspondents at the TV stations.

The NANO-TV project will therefore perform a quantitative analysis of the overall media impact of its

distribution and broadcasting activities, in order to provide the NMP Theme with a non-trivial, critical

assessment of the project results, on the basis of audience data and of a series of media indicators.

Two different sets of indicators will be defined and measured:

Audience indicators, providing basic information on actual broadcasts and audience data

Performance indicators, aiming to provide a quantitative assessment of media relevance and

thoroughness of the actual broadcastings.

A. Audience indicators

The project will implement several instruments to assess and measure the overall media impact of the

project. The first, necessary step to perform these measures is the collection of data regarding the

highest possible number of broadcast of project’s VNRs, their format, their duration, etc. These data

will be collected in model grids, called

1. B = Tables of broadcasting = information on NANO-TV broadcasting on all European

target TV station in period P (P=lifetime of the project).

These tables will contain basic data on broadcastings, such as time, channel, program,

audience, etc. and will provide accurate information on the media penetration capacity of the

project and will constitute the main performance indicators about the effective success of

distribution and broadcasting achieved by the project. The data contained in the tables are:

Name and country of the TV station.

Name and time of the program

Name of the NANO-TV broadcast film(s) broadcasted

Type of edit made by the TV station

Audience data, if available.

These tables have already been successfully provided by the NANO-TV partnership in other

similar EU-funded initiatives.

On the basis of the tables of broadcasting, listing all project broadcastings, the overall audience reach

of the project will be calculated according to the following formula:

Page 42: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

42

2. A = Audience = sum of audience data of all effectively broadcast VNRs on all TV stations

in period P (P=lifetime of the project)

The audience A will be provided in an aggregated form and will give information about the

total audience reach of the NANO-TV audiovisuals. However, this indicator can be further

broken down per country, per VNRs, per type of program, etc, in order to provide an

analytical assessment of the audience reach of NANO-TV audiovisuals. Audience is a very

basic indicator for TV media. NANO-TV will collect for each registered broadcast the

audience data of the programming segment where the video has been effectively broadcast,

where possible. Alternatively, average audience data based on historical series will be

retrieved. This work shall be carried out in co-operation with the partner TV stations from the

very beginning of the project.

B. Media indicators

In addition to the performance indicators, and in particular to the tables of broadcasting, the project

will try to perform quantitative analysis of its audience reach, through the implementation of a number

of media indicators.

The assumption for the development of new media indicators is the belief that audience data are not

fully representative of the quality of the message which has reached the final user, i.e. the TV

watchers. This can be easily assessed by analysing the typical use of the delivered VNRs made by TV

stations:

News can reach a larger audience on a larger number of TV channels. They target the

news/information segment, are short, they can be produced in large number and address a

very large number of topics and issues, and can be easily inserted into a variety of

programming slots. They can be more easily handled by multipliers and exchanges, such as

the Eurovision. On the other side, reportages of the (typical) duration of 3 minutes can just

bring forward basic messages, and often do not have the strength to ―go inside‖ the message

they refer to. News treatment is thus positioned in that grey area between information and

communication, depending on the way TV broadcasters treat them.

Longer, edited documentaries (features) packaged on the delivered VNR footage and

materials have a more limited audience, as they are non-editable stuff, and impose to the TV

broadcasters a pre-defined editorial vision. Under this point of view, they have a much

smaller market than news. As a consequence, one should expect that the audience reached by

fully edited documentaries is much smaller in absolute terms than the one made by news.

Additional difficulties are constituted by price (they are more expensive to produce than

simple news) and language (which voiceover?). On the other side, a long documentary can

much better represent the message to be carried across the media, and explore with a very

high degree of accuracy all aspects connected to the treated issues.

Page 43: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

43

It is clear that we are in the presence of two very different models of communication. We will

tentatively define two main new indicators aiming to give quantitative representation to the model

described above and exemplified in the graph below:

The project will calculate and deliver two different indicators measuring the impact of the

broadcasting on its audience:

3. M = Media relevance = number of registered broadcasts in period P / duration of period

P (P=lifetime of the project)

This indicator gives a measure of the media relevance for each audiovisual distributed and

broadcast by the totality of European TV stations. High values of M imply a large interest on

the subject by the media. Period P will be typically a time window of about 8 to 10 weeks

from their initial distribution date. We expect high values of M for news treatment, less for

longer reportages. The calculation of M shall be seen in a wider perspective, as it can provide

in the medium-term the Commission Services and the Editorial Committee with additional

guidance about the themes and the treatments which are most attractive for the TV media. Last

but not least, M can be broken down per country, type of TV stations and a variety of way,

and provide information about local impact of the audiovisuals. In a normalised scale from 0

to 1, which will be adopted by the project, values superior to 0.7 would be considered

indication of a very successful media coverage for a given audiovisual productions.

4. T = Thoroughness = average duration of registered broadcasts in period P / duration of

period P (P=lifetime of the project)

This indicator monitors the duration of the reportages as they appeared in TV programs. By

dividing the average duration of broadcasts for the period P (again, typically between 8 and 10

weeks from their distribution), we obtain a raw indication of the way a subject has been

treated. We experienced that TV stations can build rather long reportages on the basis on the

audiovisual and supporting information delivered to them. We expect high values of T for

long reportages, less for news treatment. In a normalised scale from 0 to 1, which will be

adopted by the project, values superior to 0.7 would be considered indication of a very

successful accuracy and wish to get inside the subject for a given audiovisual productions

Audience reach

Accuracy and

thoroughness

Features

News

Page 44: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

44

High values of T indicate a high thematic interest by the media, and a wish to go more in-depth in

understanding and knowledge.

As for M, also this indicator can be used by the Commission Services and the Editorial Committee to

fine tune commitment and guide the thematic choice of subjects for broadcasters.

Other aggregated indicators, to be calculated on the basis of the four basic quantities A, B, M and T

and their derivates, might be developed by the project during its lifetime.

Comparison of these two indicators, at the end of the project, will provide a fair photography on how

TV media perceive the issues put forward by the through audiovisual dissemination.

C. AUDIENCE DATA

On the basis of previous experiences we can make an a priori estimate of the total audience of

the NANO-TV broadcasts per each of the three main distribution channels we operate on.

Communication activities via television media require specific attention. In fact, news can

reach a larger audience on a bigger number of TV channels, targeting the news/information

segment: they are short, they can be produced in great quantity and they address a very large

number of topics and issues. News also has the added advantage of fitting into a variety of

programming slots easily. They are very versatile when handled by multipliers and

communication gateways, such as the Eurovision. On the other hand, reportages in form of

―teasers‖ with a typical duration of 3 minutes can just bring forward basic messages, and

often do not have the strength to ―go inside‖ the message they refer to. So TV news occupies

a kind of grey area between straight information and communication, depending on the way

broadcasters use the footage.

Anyway, there is a downside to longer, edited documentaries (features) packaged like a full-

edition video footage and materials: they have a more limited audience, as they are non-

editable and they tend to impose a pre-defined editorial vision on broadcasters. From this

point of view, they have a much smaller market than news. As a consequence, one should

expect that the audience reached by fully edited documentaries will turn out to be much

smaller than the audience reached by news. Costs (documentaries are more expensive to

produce than straight news) and language (voiceovers need to be translated) are additional

difficulties. On the other hand, a long documentary can put the message across much better,

and explore many more angles of an issue with far greater accuracy.

According to these considerations, an adjustment formula has been applied to each of the ten

Video News Releases (VNRs) of NANO TV (an additional four of them, which will target

young people, are not taken into account here). This is meant to avoid an artificial inflation of

the VNRs’ audience. For instance, if we take Euronews as the leading gateway for NANO TV

distribution, we can safely say each 4-minute long VNR broadcast in 8 languages from a

previous similar series reached an audience of 7 million people. Since, on a weekly average,

Euronews broadcasts the same video between 10 and 20 times over, and since Euronews’

audience is known to have a high turnover, audience data of any single VNR on a weekly

basis dramatically increases up to an estimated 20-25 million people, a figure which takes the

audience correction factor into account already.

Page 45: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

45

However, a significant share of the same audience on such an international gateway (which is

known to reach 244 million households) is overlapping and will be reached almost ten times.

Assuming that more broadcasts do generate an increasing feedback and dialogue within the

same audience, this should guarantee an increased quality of the expected feedback and

dialogue. By applying the same adjustment formula to the whole set of 10 VNRs and by

taking these overlaps into account, we can estimate a total outreach of around 35 to 40 million

people on Euronews only.

When it comes to the Eurovision/EBU gateway, which is another other distribution pillar of

NANO TV, this would allow to reach an average of 8 national channels per VNR, accounting

for an average audience of about 3 million people each. These broadcasts are generally longer

and closer to a talk show approach. So the associated overall broadcasts of fourteen VNRs can

reach an estimated audience of about 21 million people, if an audience overlap, as mentioned

above, is taken into account again.

Finally, the one-to-one distribution strategy (the third pillar of NANO TV media distribution)

accounts for an average audience of about 3 million viewers per VNRs, bringing the total

estimated audience for broadcasts generated by this distribution channel to another 21 million

people, according to the same correction pattern adopted for broadcasts generated by the

Eurovision/EBU distribution.

Considering that the production and distribution of NANO TV’s videos will take place

between 2009 and 2011, the total figures for television outreach over this whole period can be

prudently estimated at around 82 million people, as summarised in the following table.

Table 15. NANO TV annual outreach via television channels and gateways (2009-2011)15

Distribution

channels/gateways Euronews

EBU/Eurovision

Worldfeeds

One-to-One

communication to TV

networks

Estimated

audience per item

20-25 million people Approx. 3 million people Approx. 3 million people

Estimated audience per item

35-40 million people

(for approx. 60% of

delivered VNRs)

Approx. 21 million people Approx. 21 million people

TOTAL AUDIENCE (2009-

2011)

Approx. 82 million people

Number of TV stations

actually broadcasting

1

(for approx. 60% of

delivered VNRs)

From 5 to 10 (from

youris.com historical

series)

From 4 to 8 (from

youris.com historical series)

15

Personal Communication from Ing. Mario Martinoli, coordinator NANOTV.

Page 46: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

46

Distribution

channels/gateways Euronews

EBU/Eurovision

Worldfeeds

One-to-One

communication to TV

networks

Target

News / Features Mostly News Mostly Features

Languages

9

(English, French,

German, Spanish, Italian,

Portuguese, Russian,

Arab, Turkish)

All, but depending on

downloads

All, but depending on

contacts

Broadcasting time span from

distribution

1 week

Several months Several months

Tracking of broadcasting

Complete Complete up to 6 weeks

from satellite broadcasting

Complete for TV channels

providing data

An overall 20% figure can be assumed for feedback outreach (around 16 million people),

while outreach figures for active dialogue can be estimated at 2% of this amount, around

300,000 people.

Page 47: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

47

Assessing outreach: estimated measures of TV media impact

Page 48: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

48

Country TV Station

The

Ecologic

Way to

Paradise

Comm.

Heritage

Turns

Green

Growing

Ecologic

Buildings

A Green

Energy

I Drive

with

Your

Waste

Stop

Wasting

the

Waste

The

Waltz of

the

Mirrors

Grey

Water to

Heat my

Apart.

Heat

from the

Centre of

the Earth

The End

of Fossil

Energy

Hydrog.

Test

Drive

Power

from the

Islands

TOTAL

27 June

2008

27 June

2008

27 June

2008

2 July

2008

2 July

2008

2 July

2008

16 July

2008

21 Oct.

2008

21 Oct.

2008

22 Oct.

2008

22 Oct.

2008

23 Oct.

2008

ALGERIA Enterprise Nationale

de Television YES YES YES 3

ALGERIA Télédiffusion

d’Algerie YES YES 2

BELGIUM TV Oost Vlaanderen

NV YES 1

BELGIUM Vlaamse Radio en

Televisieomroep YES YES YES 3

CHINA China Central

Television YES 1

CROATIA Hrvatska

Radiotelevizija YES YES YES YES YES 5

CROATIA Kapital Network YES 1

CZECH

REPUBLIC Ceska Televize YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES 10

EGYPT Ana YES YES YES YES YES 5

EUROPE Euronews YES YES YES YES YES YES YES 7

FINLAND Yleisradio Oy YES YES YES 3

FRANCE France 3 YES 1

FRANCE Canal+ YES 1

FRANCE Métropole 6 YES 1

GERMANY TVT.media GmbH YES 1

GERMANY Pro Sieben YES YES 2

Page 49: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

49

Country TV Station

The

Ecologic

Way to

Paradise

Comm.

Heritage

Turns

Green

Growing

Ecologic

Buildings

A Green

Energy

I Drive

with

Your

Waste

Stop

Wasting

the

Waste

The

Waltz of

the

Mirrors

Grey

Water to

Heat my

Apart.

Heat

from the

Centre of

the Earth

The End

of Fossil

Energy

Hydrog.

Test

Drive

Power

from the

Islands

TOTAL

27 June

2008

27 June

2008

27 June

2008

2 July

2008

2 July

2008

2 July

2008

16 July

2008

21 Oct.

2008

21 Oct.

2008

22 Oct.

2008

22 Oct.

2008

23 Oct.

2008

GERMANY Phoenix (joint ARD-

ZDF venture) YES 1

GERMANY ZDF YES 1

IRELAND Radio Telefis

Eireann YES YES 2

ISRAEL Israel Broadcasting

Authority YES 1

ISRAEL The Sports Channel YES 1

LUXEMB. Broadcasting Center

Europe YES YES YES 3

LUXEMB. CLT Multi Media YES YES 2

MALTA GO plc YES 1

MEXICO

Productora y

Comercializadora de

Television S.A.

YES YES YES YES YES 5

MONTE

NEGRO

Radiotelevisija Crne

Gore YES 1

NEW

ZEALAND

Television New

Zealand Ltd. YES YES YES 3

NORWAY Norsk

Rikskringkasting As YES 1

POLAND Telewizja Polska SA YES 1

PORTUGAL Radiotelevisao

Portuguesa Ep YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES 12

PORTUGAL

Sociedade

Independente de

Comunicacao S.A.

YES YES YES YES 4

SAN

MARINO San Marino RTV YES YES YES 3

SERBIA RTS YES YES YES YES 4

SPAIN TVE YES YES YES YES 4

Page 50: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

50

Country TV Station

The

Ecologic

Way to

Paradise

Comm.

Heritage

Turns

Green

Growing

Ecologic

Buildings

A Green

Energy

I Drive

with

Your

Waste

Stop

Wasting

the

Waste

The

Waltz of

the

Mirrors

Grey

Water to

Heat my

Apart.

Heat

from the

Centre of

the Earth

The End

of Fossil

Energy

Hydrog.

Test

Drive

Power

from the

Islands

TOTAL

27 June

2008

27 June

2008

27 June

2008

2 July

2008

2 July

2008

2 July

2008

16 July

2008

21 Oct.

2008

21 Oct.

2008

22 Oct.

2008

22 Oct.

2008

23 Oct.

2008

SPAIN Canal 4 Castilla y

Leon YES YES YES 3

SWITZER

LAND

Dominique Curchod

Communications

S.A.

YES 1

SWITZER

LAND EBU YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES 12

TURKEY CAN YES YES 2

TURKEY GYG YES YES 2

UNITED

KINGDOM BBC YES 1

UNITED

STATES OF

AMERICA

NBC YES 1

TOTAL

8 8 6 8 8 6 12 10 10 14 17 12 119

Page 51: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

51

Overall communication outreach (2009-2011)

OUTREACH MEASURED AS COVERAGE, FEEDBACK

AND DIALOGUE VIA MULTIPLIER-AUDIENCES (Figures represent end-audiences (E), i.e. citizens, attained via multiplier-audiences )

Legenda:

OUTPUT Coverage

OUTTAKE Feedback

OUTCOME Dialogue

MULTIPLIER-AUDIENCES

A.

SCHOOLS B. SCIENCE

CENTRES C. MEDIA D. SCIENTISTS /

INDUSTRY / BUSINESS E.

NGOs F. POLICY MAKERS

Activity

1 630.000 15.000

50.000 13.500

9.045

1.350

422.100 12.000

12.500 7.920

5.306

792

105.525 6.000

2.500 3.960

2.653

396

2 3.925.032 855.821

37.500 6.750

6.750

1.200

2.653.456 580.960

9.375 3.960

3.960

600

560.525 131.751

1.875 1.980

1.980

240

2.1 75.600 3.021

56.700 2.024

51.030 506

2.2 75.600 18.000

56.700 12.060

22.680 3.015

2.3 65.016 75.600

56.564 56.700

50.908 22.680

2.4 56.700 75.600

51.030 56.700

20.412 22.680

2.5 56.700 20.300

51.030 13.601

20.412 3.400

Page 52: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

52

2.6 75.600 720.000

56.700 482.400

51.030 96.480

2.7 56.700

51.030

20.412

2.8 2.010.000

1.346.700

336.675

2.9 345.000

231.150

115.575

2.10 56.700

51.030

20.412

2.11 6.000

5.100

2.040

2.12 1.260.000

844.200

42.210

2.13 550.000

368.500

20.268

3 3.000 2.417.700

2.723 1.500

23.438

3.750

900 1.633.980

817 750

15.703

1.875

90 474.702

82 300

3.926

750

3.1 2.010.000

1.346.700

336.675

3.2 345.000

231.150

115.575

3.3 56.700

51.030

20.412

Page 53: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

53

3.4 6.000

5.100

2.040

4 2.700 1.920.000

8.250 7.500

25.000

2.250

810 1.286.400

2.475 3.750

16.750

1.125

81 51.456

248 1.500

4.188

450

5 820.000

5.000 18.000

25.000

11.250

549.400

3.750 10.800

16.750

5.625

21.976

2.813 8.100

4.188

2.250

6 550.000

16.500 13.500

50.000

5.625

368.500

4.950 8.100

33.500

2.813

20.268

495 6.075

8.375

1.125

7 15.000

5.000 31.250

11.250

8.438

3.000

3.750 20.938

5.625

4.219

300

2.813 5.234

2.250

1.688

8 15.000

82.000.000 125.000

11.250

3.750

4.500

16.000.660 83.750

5.625

1.875

450

300.812 20.938

2.250

750

9 904.200

9.500.000 125.000

250.000

3.750

605.814

3.800.000 83.750

167.500

1.875

12.116

2.850.000 20.938

41.875

750

10 15.000

9.900 250.000

170.544

62.500

4.500

2.970 167.500

85.272

41.875

450

297 41.875

63.962

10.469

11 9.900 7.500

25.000

127.908

2.970 3.750

16.750

63.954

297 1.500

4.188

47.971

12 7.500 25.000

10.125

3.750 16.750

5.063

1.500 4.188

2.025

13 250.000

Page 54: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

54

10.125

167.500 5.063

41.875 2.025

14 112.200

56.100

42.080

15 125.000

83.750

20.938

16 125.000

83.750

20.938

Totals years 2009-2011

A.

SCHOOLS B.

SCIENCE CENTRES C.

MEDIA D. SCIENTISTS/

INDUSTRY/BUSINESS E.

NGOs D.

POLICY MAKERS

4.560.162 7.527.721

91.644.773 1.123.888

588.214

249.883

3.077.095 5.049.054

19.844.217 725.958

359.970

135.684

666.203 719.469

3.162.231 223.765

136.640

70.461

Legenda: Grand Totals

OUTPUT Coverage Coverage 105.694.640

OUTTAKE Feedback Feedback 29.191.977

OUTCOME Dialogue Dialogue 4.978.769

ratio Feedback / Coverage (%) 27,6

ratio Dialogue / Coverage (%) 4,7

Page 55: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

55

Essential bibliography

BMRB international (2004): Nanotechnology: views of the general public (2004):, in

www.nanotech.org.uk.

BMRB international (2007), Public perceptions about nanotechnology: risks, benefits and trust,

London, 2007, in www.nanotech.org.uk.

Bonazzi, M. (2009A): "Communication outreach in nanotechnology: focus on young audiences",

EuroNanoForum2009,, proceedings, poster n° 169, http://www.czech-in.org/euronano/website/posters.pdf and

Bonazzi, M. (2009B): "EU communication outreach in nanotechnology: EC-funded projects", presentation and

article in session "New nano projects in the ECSITE network", ECSITE-Annual Conference 2009, Proceedings,

5-6 June 2009, p. 48, at http://www.ecsite-conference.net/content/user/File/2announcement2009final.pdf Bonazzi, M.(ed.), (2007A): Working paper resulting from the workshop on: Strategy for communication

outreach in nanotechnology,, EC, Brussels, 6th

February 2007,

http://cordis.europa.eu/nanotechnology/src/publication_events.htm

Bonazzi, M. and Palumbo, J. (eds.), (2007): Report from the workshop - Communication Outreach in

Nanotechnology: from recommendation to action,, EC, Brussels, 24-25th

October 2007,

http://cordis.europa.eu/nanotechnology/src/publication_events.htm

Bonazzi, M. (2004): Survey on communication outreach in nanotechnology through National Contact Points,

European Commission, DG RTD G.4, internal working paper.

Capurro, R., (2004): "EGE Opinion No. 21: "Ethical Aspects of Nanomedicine", in

EURONANOFORUM 2007, March 2007; Brussels, 2007.

Capurro, R. (2004): "Reflections on Benefits, Risks, Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects of

Nanotechnology", in Nanoforum (2004), Brussels, 2004.

Cobb, M.D.; Macoubrie, J, (2002): "Public attitudes towards nanotechnology" (2002): Bainbridge,

W.S., J.Nanoparticle Res. 2002, 4 , 561-570.

Cobb, M.D.; Macoubrie, J, (2004): "Public perceptions about nanotechnology: risks, benefits and

trust". J.Nanoparticle Res., 2004, 6, 395-405.

Cobb, M.D.(2002): Public attitudes towards nanotechnology (2002): Bainbridge, London, 2002.

(La) Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés (CNIL) has named its 2006 annual

report: ―Alerte à la société de surveillance‖ (―Alert to the Surveillance Society‖

http://www.cnil.fr/fileadmin/documents/La_CNIL/publications/CNIL-

27erapport-2006.pdf).

Crain, W.C. (1985): Theories of Development. Prentice-Hall. pp. 118-136.

EURONANOFORUM 2009, in http://www.euronanoforum2009.eu/

European Commission (2001): ―Europeans, Science and Technology‖ in Eurobarometer 55.2,

Brussels, December 2001;

Page 56: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

56

European Commission (2004): Towards a European Strategy for Nanotechnology, COM(2004)338;

EC,

Brussels, 2004, at: http://cordis.europa.eu.int/nanotechnology/actionplan.htm

European Commission (2005): Nanosciences and nanotechnologies: An action plan for Europe 2005-

2009, COM (2005) 243 , EC, 2005, Brussels, at:

http://cordis.europa.eu.int/nanotechnology/actionplan.htm

European Commission (2004): Nanotechnology: views of the general public (2004), EC, Brussels.

European Commission (2005): Nanosciences and nanotechnologies: An action plan for Europe 2005-

2009, COM(2005)243, Brussels, 2005.

European Commission (2006): "Europeans and Biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and Trends", in

Eurobarometer, Brussels, July 2006.

European Commission (2007): Communication outreach in nanotechnology: from recommendation to

action, EC, Brussels, 2007.

European Commission (2007): Strategy for communication outreach in nanotechnology, EC, Brussels.

European Commission (2007): Open consultation on a strategy for communication outreach in

nanotechnology, EC, Brussels, 2007.

European Commission (2009): Art and Science: creative fusion, EC, Brussels, 2009.

EURONANOFORUM (2004) Ethical Aspects of Nanomedicine,

http://www.capurro.de/nanoethics.html.

Gaskell, G.; Allum, N.; Stares, S. (2003): Europeans and Biotechnology in 2002: Eurobarometer 58.0;

Methodology Institute, London School of Economics, London U.K.

Gilligan, C. (1977). "In a Different Voice: Women's Conceptions of Self and Morality". Harvard

Educational Review, 47.

Lemoine, P. (2006), Nanotechnologie, Informatique et Libertés, Communication du 12 janvier 2006 -

special report on Nanotechnology, privacy and data protection, CNIL, Paris, 2006.

http://www.cnil.fr/fileadmin/documents/approfondir/dossier/technologies/Com-phl-

Nanotechnologies.pdf

NANODIALOGUE (2007) "Nano-technologies and Nanosciences: A discussion of ethical, legal and

social aspects", Nanodialogue final Conference, 5th February 2007, Brussels, 2007.

NANODIALOGUE (2007) "Nano-technologies and Nanosciences", Nanodialogue final Conference,

5th February 2007, Brussels, 2007.

NANOLOGUE (2007), Europe-wide dialogue on benefits, risks and social, ethical and legal

implications of nanotechnology. at: www.nanologue.net/

NANOTOTOUCH Annex I, Description of Work, contract n°, NMP-CSA-2-233473, EC, DG RTD,

G.4 Brussels

NANOTV Annex I, Description of Work, contract n°, NMP-CSA-2-233486, EC, DG RTD, G.4

Brussels

Page 57: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

57

NANOYOU Annex I, Description of Work, contract n°, NMP-CSA-2-233433, EC, DG RTD, G.4

Brussels

Piaget, J. (1932): The moral Judgment of a Child

http://www.archive.org/details/moraljudgmentoft005613mbp

TA-Swiss project (2006): Swiss publifocus on nanotechnologies, (2006), in TA-SWISS, the Centre

for Technology Assessment

The European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (EGE) advisory of the EC President,

(2007): Opinion on Nanomedicine at: http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/avis/index_en.htm

The Royal Society, (2004) "Effects of nanotechnology on the environment", Nanotechnology

Applications (http://www.understandingnano.com/nanotech-applications.html), London, 2004

The Royal Society (2007) Towards an RFID policy for Europe (http://ec.europa.eu/information

_society/policy/rfid/index_en.htm), London, 2007

TIMEFORNANO Annex I, Description of Work, contract n°, NMP-CSA-2-233481, EC, DG RTD, G.4

Brussels

Page 58: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

58

Extensive bibliography

EVENTS: GOVERNANCE & SCIENCE in a knowledge-based EU society, (2005) EC seminar, SDME 02/136-137, 24-25 November 2005 COMMUNICATING RESEARCH(2005) international conference, Brussels, 14-15 November 2005 CITIZENS’ DECLARATION ON THE CITY OF TOMORROW (2005), presentation at the European Parliament, Brussels, 5 December 2005

BOOKS:

Carrada, A . (2005): Comunicare la Scienza, I quaderni del MdS, ITER Ed., Milano, Italy Workbook on Communication Management and Media Skills for Scientists & Engineers (2002), Foundation for Education, Science and Technology, adapted from notes of Jenny Metcalfe, Econnect, Sydney, Australia

Citizens as Partners (2001), OECE, Paris

REPORTS:

Science and Society (2000) report published by the House of Lords Select Committee Dialogue with the public: practical guidelines (2002) report published by the Research Councils

UK, People Science & Policy Ltd & Taylor Nelson Sofres

Excellence and Opportunity-Science and Innovation White Paper (2000), Office

for Science & Technology, UK, Ministry Industry & Trade, 2000

The “ten commandments” of nano-communication or how to deal with public

perception (2005), The Innovation Society Ltd, St.Gallen ½, Switzerland

Seminar Science and governance (2005): short presentation of projects, pp37-46, 49-65, 72-

77; EC, Brussels, November 2005

Bio to Nano: learning the lessons, interrogating the comparison (2004): working paper,

Lancaster University and Demos, Lancaster, UK

Big Picture on nanoscience (2005): issue 2, Wellcome Trust, London

The SPIN project: Strategic communication planning (2003): Independent Media institute,

San Francisco, U.S.A.

Making USGS information effective in the e-age, open-file Report (2003):, New York,

SciZmic, executive reports on viewpoint cards (2005): New York

Meeting of Minds, Results of Citizens’ convention (2005): information brochure and report,

Meeting of Minds Europe, Brussels

Page 59: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

59

Communication planning for organizations (2003): Ministry of agriculture, food and rural

affairs, Ontario, Canada

Nanotechnology: opportunity and risks (2005): Trans-disciplinary case study, ETH,

Zurich, Switzerland

Nanotechnology, risk and sustainability (2005): progress report, Lancaster University and

Demos, Lancaster, UK

Smalltalk (2005); research policy, Parliament magazine, Brussels

SCA-IT convergence communication plan - vehicle analysis (2005): executive report,

USDA , New York

WEB LINKS: COMMUNICATION PLAN

1) COMMUNICATION PLANSCreate a Communication Plan. Good communication does not just happen. www.energystar.gov/ index.cfm?c=implement_plan.communication_plan

2) Draft a Communications Plan : ENERGY STAR Using a plan to guide your

organization's communications efforts to target www.energystar.gov/index. cfm?c=drafting_plan.ck_drafting_plan -

3) The Communication Plan - Build your communication plan before strategic

planning begins www.nsba.org/sbot/toolkit/tcp.html

4) Crisis Communication Plan - Crisis Communication Plan: A PR Blue Print ...

This crisis communication plan will outline a generic, basic crisis communication plan. ... www3.niu.edu/newsplace/crisis.html

5) Communication Plan A communication plan identifies people with an interest

in the project www.washington.edu/computing/pm/plan/communication.html 6) Crisis Communication Plan LSU's Crisis Communications Plan. ... This crisis

communication plan will offer some possible crisis scenarios and suggestions for handling those scenarios, ... www.lsu.edu/university_relations/crisis.html

7) Le Ministère de la culture et de la communication : plan du site 2005 Logo

du ministère de la culture et de la communication, retour page d'accueil · actualités · dossiers thématiques · le ministère · régions www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/home/plan.htm - 33k

8) Approche, agence de communication : plan Vous proposer des solutions,

définir un plan de communication · > Construire une démarche cohérente, choisir les bons outils www.approche.net/plan.php3

9) LE PLAN DE COMMUNICATION : de la théorie à la pratique Format de

fichier: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Version HTML

Page 60: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

60

Comment faire pour que le plan de communication soit à la fois celui de la direction qui y retrouve ... de communication et nouveau plan de communication ... www.sciences-po.fr/spf/programmes/com/7120.pdf

10) Technologies de l'information et de la communication :Plan du site Les

technologies de l'information et de la communication sont largement diffusées et utilisées, ce qui renforce leur incidence économique et sociale. www.oecd.org/SiteMap

11) Directory Services - Communication Plan. Guidelines. · Communicate with all affected parties. · Every message should be audience-specific. ... www.colorado.edu/Committees/ DirectoryServices/CommunicationPlan.htm

12) Communication - Plan d'action pour les march publics ctroniques Format

de fichier: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Version HTML La présente communication propose un plan d’action pour la mise en œuvre du nouveau cadre. juridique des marchés publics électroniques adopté en avril 2004 ... europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/publicprocurement/ docs/eprocurement/actionplan/actionplan_fr.pdf -

13) The Communication Plan - Second Edition (2001)* - Create a complete

strategic communication plan for your organization or client with the ... Since the first edition of "The Communication Plan: The Heart of ... shop.store.yahoo.com/iabcstore/complan.html -

14) Communication Plan - [ Traduire cette page ] Online community for IT project

managers offers resources and expertise in Project Communication Plan.Management, Package Selection, CRM, PMO, e-commerce, ... www.gantthead.com/deliverable.cfm -

15) Integrated Marketing Communication Plan Including Public

Relations .Makovsky offers breadth of services in integrated marketing

communication plan, public relations, investor relations, visual communications and interactive. www.makovsky.com/ integrated-marketing-communication-plan.htm -

16) City of Ashland, Oregon - Communication Plan - Strong and Consistent

Messages – A successful communication plan is built ... The communication plan should support, reinforce and reflect the goals of the ... www.ashland.or.us/Page.asp?NavID=1583 - 56k - 4 déc 2005

17) American Red Cross Encourages Household The need to create a family

communication plan is critical, and now is the time to do so. During the unprecedented hurricane season of last year, ... www.redcross.org/pressrelease/0,1077,0_314_4468,00.html

18) OSHC COMMUNICATION PLAN Communication Plan date of last update:

May 14, 2004 . ... Strengthen, Expand and Sustain Communication Plan on OSH through Strategic Alliances with ... www.oshc.dole.gov.ph/commplan.htm -

19) USDA IT Convergence Web Site: Links ITS >> Home >> Communication

Plan. Communication Plan. Communication Plan Cover graphic. Communication Plan (WORD 4115K). Appendix A (Excel 28K). Appendix B ...

Page 61: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

61

www.its.ocio.usda.gov/commplan.htm -

20) HIV Vaccine Communication Plan, NIAID Division of AIDS, HIV HIV

Vaccine Communication Plan. Final Report "HIV Vaccine Research Communications: The Current Environment". Navigation. Last updated 03/03/03 (rjt) www.niaid.nih.gov/daids/vaccine/commplan.htm

21) COMMUNICATION PLANYou can download the Consultation & Communication Plan. ... The Consultation and Communication Plan for the Review of Services sets out the objectives, ... www.cityofkingston.ca/ cityhall/committees/ros/consult.asp -

22) Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Communication Plan - The Communication

Plan in force takes into account the experience accrued ... Along with the elements needed for continuity, the Communication Plan aims at ... www.esteri.it/eng/6_39.asp -

23) Crisis Communication Plan: UAF University Relations -The UAF Crisis

Communication Plan (CCP) plan does not change the way emergencies are ... (128K) Download a Crisis Communication Plan reminder card (PDF 44K) ... www.uaf.edu/univrel/crisisplan/ -

24) APEGBC - APEGBC Strategic Communication Plan -

www.apeg.bc.ca/library/stratcommplan.html - 1k -

25) Communication plan is the key in a corporate crisis - Veech Tylenol,

Bridgestone Firestone, Columbine High School, Exxon, McDonald's, United Airlines, American Airlines — all of these organizations have been ... news-info.wustl.edu/news/page/normal/4352.html -

26) V. Communication plan - Our communication plan includes a new powerful

information tool-the World Wide Web ... Each audience has a two-way communication plan fitted to its needs. ... www.iastate.edu/~vision2020/Phase2/proposal5.html -

27) TexShare - Texas State Library - In the following pages, you will find a

Communication Plan (CommPlan) ... Task: Have a Communication Plan event in January involving 75% of libraries. ... www.texshare.edu/memberinfo/communication.html -

28) Marketing Plan Software and Sample Marketing Plans - Mplans.com -

ADVERTISING SOFTWARE Advertising Plan Pro Plan your integrated advertising, promotions and marketing communications with Advertising Plan Pro. ... www.mplans.com/ - 26k - 4 déc 2005 -

29) Information Technology Competitive Sourcing Communications Plan Format de fichier: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Version HTML overall goal of the Communication Plan is to provide the DOE workforce and ... Communication Plan are to ensure that the DOE IT workforce and other ... cio.doe.gov/SProjects/ITCP.pdf -

30) Strategic Communication Plan - Research Makes Sense For

Page 62: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

62

Students Home > Home > About "Research Makes Sense for Students"

> Strategic Communication Plan. Strategic Communication Plan ... www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/researchandstudents/ nav02.cfm?nav02=19723&nav01=19717 - 52k - 5 déc 2005

31) COMMUNICATING PLANFact Sheets associated with the Syphilis Elimination

Effort (SEE) - including Syphilis, Syphilis and MSM, Select US Counties' Fact Sheets, and more. www.cdc.gov/stopsyphilis/CommPlan.htm - 18k -

32) Offshore Development Communication Plan : e-Zest Solutions

Punee-Zest Solutions (Offshore Software Development Company from Pune India

) specialises in Offshore Software Product Development, Offshore Custom Software ... www.e-zest.net/Offshore_Development_Communication.htm - 2

33) Project Communication Plan, Transformational Learning Abilities

.Project Communication Plan. Overview | Samford Learning Roundtable |

Assessment Plan | Faculty Institute Presentation ... www.samford.edu/groups/tla/communication.html -

34) WEEB -- Communication Plan - In 1998 an ad-hoc committee of the WAEE

Board, chaired by Paul Wozniak developed a WAEE Communications Plan addressing this need. Also during 1998 the staff ... www.uwsp.edu/cnr/weeb/supportpages/communicplan.htm -

35) Communication Plan for Upcoming Moves Format de fichier: PDF/Adobe

Acrobat - Version HTML Communication Plan for Upcoming Moves. Faculty Reinvestment—New Faculty—Phase I—FY05-06. Establish ―points of contact.‖ ... communications.tamu.edu/cbe/Documents/ Communication%20Plan%20for%20Upcoming%20Moves0312.pdf -

36) Communication Plan Format de fichier: Microsoft Word 2000 - Version HTML

This is where a Communication Plan is useful. A Communication Plan allows you to think through how to communicate most efficiently and effectively to the ... www.oit.state.co.us/pmo/Templates/CommunicationPlan.doc -

37) Crisis Communication Plan - Campus Environment- September 1, 2001 - A

crisis communication plan provides policies and procedures for the coordination of ... It is the goal of this crisis communications plan to establish ... www.ncsu.edu/policies/alumni_dev/ public_affairs/REG1025.00.2.php -

38) Competitive Sourcing (A-76) Communications Plan for Information ... Format de fichier: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Version HTML Communications Plan for CIO A-76 Study of Information Technology Positions. 1.0. Purpose. This is the Communications Plan for DOE’s Competitive Sourcing ... cio.doe.gov/SProjects/appendA.pdf -

39) Draft Strategic Communication Plan Format de fichier: PDF/Adobe Acrobat -

Version HTML Global Communication Plan for the International Linear Collider. ... met to develop a draft ILC Strategic Communication Plan, which they presented in a ... www.interactions.org/linearcollider/ documents/ILC_comm_plan.pdf -

Page 63: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

63

40) Communication Plan - An outline of the communication plan should be

included in the Abbreviated Task ... Where possible, the research communication plan should be developed in ... www.reef.crc.org.au/forcrcreef/CommunicationPlan.htm -

WEB-LINKS on NANO DEBATE

1) Center for Responsible Nanotechnology- The mission of CRN is to raise

awareness of the issues presented by nanotechnology> the benefits and dangers,

and the possibilities for responsible use.

2) ETC Group- Action group on erosion, technology and concentration

3) Encouraging early public engagement with nanotechnology- This research asks

whether the public debate around new technologies can be moved upstream, closer

to the heart of nanotechnology R&D processes. By looking at the development of

nanotechnology applications in healthcare, computing, energy, new materials and

cosmetics, the research aims to develop techniques for incorporating sustainability

considerations early in the development of the technologies and associated

regulatory processes.

4) Global Dialogue on Nanotechnology and the Poor - Opportunities and Risks- The

goals of the project are to raise awareness about the implications of

nanotechnology for the poor; close the gaps within and between sectors of society

to develop an action plan that addresses opportunities and risks; and identify ways

that science and technology can play an appropriate role in the development

process.

5) Greenpeace- Greenpeace is an independent non-profit global environmental

campaigning organization.

6) Hazards Magazine briefing on nanotechnology

7) ICON Environmental, Health and Safety Database- The world's first online

database of scientific findings related to the benefits and risks of nanotechnology.

8) Institute of Occupational Medicine Risk Assessment of Nanoparticles

9) International Council on Nanotechnology- ICON says its mission is to assess,

communicate, and reduce nanotechnology environmental and health risks while

maximizing its societal benefit.

10) NIOSH on Nanotechnology- Information on nanotech from the US National

Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

11) NanoJury- The Nano Jury brought together twenty randomly-chosen people from

different backgrounds who heard evidence about a wide range of possible futures,

and the role that nanotechnologies might play in them. Over five weeks, the jurors

heard from a variety of witnesses with widely varying perspectives, which they

drew on in coming up with a set of recommendations. These will inform how

debates as to how this emerging and potentially revolutionary technology should

Page 64: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

64

develop. It is sponsored by the IRC in Nanotechnology at the University of

Cambridge, Greenpeace UK, the Guardian and the Policy, Ethics and Life

Sciences Research Centre at the University of Newcastle.

12) Nanologue EU European dialogue project- Europe-wide dialogue launched on

benefits, risks and social, ethical and legal implications of nanotechnologies.

13) Nanotechnology and News Production - scientists', journalists' and editors' views-

This is an ESRC-funded project investigating the production and coverage of news

on nanotechnology as it applies to medicine. The project examines how scientists,

journalists, and editors, respectively, see their roles in the production of news on

nanotechnology and the key factors affecting press coverage. In exploring these

issues it aims to reveal the nature of the relationship between science and news

media and how this may shape coverage of science issues, and thereby advance

understanding of public responses to nanotechnologies.

14) Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies- Established in April 2005, the project is a

partnership between the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and

the Pew Charitable Trusts.

15) Safety of Nanomaterials Interdisciplinary Research Centre- The Safety of

Nanomaterials Interdisciplinary Research Centre (SnIRC) is based on existing

collaborations between the Institute of Occupational Medicine in Edinburgh, UK,

Napier University, UK, Aberdeen University, UK, Edinburgh University and the

US National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).

16) Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR)- SGR promotes ethical science and

technology - based on the principles of openness, accountability, peace, social

justice, and environmental sustainability. Our work involves research, education,

lobbying and providing a support network for ethically-concerned scientists.

17) The Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology at Rice University,

US- The Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology fosters the

development of this field through an integrated set of programs that aim to address

the scientific, technological, environmental, human resource, commercialization,

and societal barriers that hinder the transition from nanoscience to

nanotechnology.

18) The Ecologist- Established in 1970, The Ecologist is the world's longest running

environmental magazine. Published in London, The magazine is read in over 150

countries by people with an interest in environmental, social and economic issues.

19) The Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering (UK) study of

nanotechnology - The Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering were

commissioned by the UK Government to investigate the potential benefits and

possible problems associated with nanotechnology and nanoscience. Find out the

results of the study here.

20) The University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics (JCB)- The University of

Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics (JCB) is a partnership between the University

of Toronto and affiliated hospitals. The JCB studies important ethical, health-

related topics through research and clinical activities. The JCB is a network of

Page 65: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

65

over 160 multidisciplinary professionals seeking to improve health care standards

at both national and international levels.

21) UK Health & Safety Executive- HSE says it wishes to interact with those

developing and using these new technologies to ensure that the knowledge of any

potential health and safety implications develops at the same time as

nanotechnologies are commercialised.

22) University of South Carolina NanoScience Studies - Societal and Ethical

Implications- A group of researchers at USC trained in a variety of disciplines who

pursue scholarly research and education about the societal, epistemological, and

ethical dimensions of nanotechnologies.

WEB LINKS: COMMUNICATION VEHICLES

1) Communications plan for audience name Format de fichier: Microsoft Word - Version HTML

Communication process—communication vehicles for [audience] ... Communications

vehicle tactical calendar for [audience]. Vehicle, [Month 1], [Month 2] ...

download.microsoft.com/download/7/1/d/ 71d24cb9-c444-4627-b2af-

40832a364bef/Communications_Planning_Guide.doc –

2) [PDF] PR Guide Smoking Cessation Services: Telling the Success Story Format de fichier: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Version HTML

Vehicle. In order for the message to reach the target audience, a communications

vehicle is required. There are several vehicles that can convey your ...

www.nosmokingday.org.uk/downloads/prguide.pdf -

3) Link Communication - market research from the uks experts - Welcome to link communications. The uks finest experiential marketing and ...

Core Target Audiences Link Communication flyering Our clients include an army ...

www.linkcommunication.co.uk/ -

4) Delivering Communications – The delivery of the communication will depend upon the chosen

communication vehicle.

... Consider the audience Who are they? Why is it important that they ...

www.jisc.ac.uk/index.cfm?name=toolkits_delivery - 26k - 14 déc 2005 –

5) Goal Format de fichier: Microsoft Word 2000 - Version HTML

The Communication Plan considered the most appropriate communication vehicle as

the means used to deliver the message to its target audience. ...

www.its.ocio.usda.gov/doc/SCMI_ ITConvergenceCommPlanOverviewRev09-23-03.doc –

6) Making USGS information effective in the electronic age, <abbr ...] Audience: Level of Relationship, Elements of Relationship, Communication Vehicle.

Public, Must be served, Interest, Potential or expressed ...

pubs.usgs.gov/of/2003/of03-240/htmldocs/append4.html - 39k In advertising the term media refers to communication vehicles such as newspapers,

... Among the criteria for selecting media vehicles are target audience ...

www.admedia.org/ - 7) Marketing Communications Objectives; Target Audience; Strategies; Internal Marketing

Communications Vehicles. 1.0 Marketing Communications Objectives ...

Page 66: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

66

www.internettime.com/book/ NCR%202001%20Communication%20Plan.doc Center to Advance

Palliative Care Six Questions|Center to ... To determine the best communications vehicle for reaching each audience, think

about the reading, listening and communications habits of that audience. ...

www.capc.org/ tools-for-palliative-care-programs/marketing-tools/six-questions - 24k –

8) Supporting your staff through reorganization Format de fichier: Microsoft Word 2000 - Version HTML

The critical factors in determining which communication vehicle to use for a

given communication will depend on assessing both the message and the audience ...

www.pacrao.org/docs/resources/ writersteam/SupportingStaffReorganization.doc

9) Appendix C: Vehicle Analysis Format de fichier: Microsoft Word 2000 - Version HTML

Small - medium audiences; Informal; Direct feedback; Perceived as committed,

approachable. Potential scheduling conflicts; Communication required to ...

www.its.ocio.usda.gov/doc/AppendixB_VehicleAnaysis.doc - 10) Making USGS information effective in the electronic age, <abbr ... –

How do you address audience needs in a communication vehicle? Is a passive product

appropriate? Active? What is your sense of how passive or active products ...

pubs.usgs.gov/of/2003/of03-240/htmldocs/append1.html - 24k –

11) WOSU Presents Ohioana Authors | Sherwood Anderson - ―Write an electronic communications vehicle study,‖ my boss Judy said in our

weekly update meeting. ... Who is the audience? How does one use it? And so on. ...

www.ohioana-authors.org/anderson/saved_career.php - 14k -

12) Target Audience and Message - Communication work is all about the message! Below you will find guides for ...

development and targeting the right audience to recieve your message. ...

www.greenmediatoolshed.org/ training/TargetAudienceandMessageI.adp - 10k - 15 déc 2005 - [PPT] HRE Format de fichier: Microsoft Powerpoint 97 - Version HTML

Communication Vehicle: On-Line Forecast Data Delivery. Audience: More sophisticated

... Communication Vehicle: Forecast Executive Summary Mailed. Audiences: ...

www.icps.com.ua/doc/communication_ strategy_present_eng.ppt

13) Risk Communication Challenge - Boston, MA This program will teach you how to use risk

communication to help various audiences

keep risk in perspective. This can move your own agenda forward, ...

www.hsph.harvard.edu/ccpe/programs/RCC.shtml - 62k -

14) Advisory Panel Reports The audiences at which health economic information is directed are as diverse

... Communication formats What is the most appropriate communication vehicle? ...

www.ispor.org/workpaper/adpanel/comm_.asp - 24k -

15) Conservation Ecology: Sustainability for the planet: A marketing ... Yet, it is unlikely that

one vehicle can reach all audiences in an effective manner.

We have to utilize more than one type of communication vehicle. ...

www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol3/iss1/art13/ - 30k –

16) Andrew Lark: Ten Ways Communications Will Change In 2005... 1) Blogs become a

prime-time communications vehicle. ... Audiences are thought

of in new terms resulting in 10-20% of big budgets shifting to viral ...

andylark.blogs.com/andylark/ 2004/12/ten_ways_commun.html - 34k -

Page 67: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

67

17) Soul City - Institute for Health and Development Communication ... People whose buy-

in is needed to ensure the edutainment vehicle is accessed by

the audience. These include the gatekeepers for the topics being addressed, ...

www.soulcity.org.za/01.01.asp

18) ] CI Toolkit Tab-03 Communication Strategies Format de fichier: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Version HTML

communication strategy details the message, audience, potential vehicles, resources

required,. and feedback mechanisms. Communication strategies are ...

www.epa.gov/superfund/tools/pdfs/3comstrats.pdf - 19) STC Jay R. Gould Student Chapter Newsletter

Documents as Prototypes: Designing Written Drafts for Communication across ...

Target Audience: To whom will the particular prototype be presented? ...

stc.llc.rpi.edu/spring03/drafts.html - 14k –

20) Creating a Communication Plan Outline .::. Fine Arts Fund ... - Do you intend to use one particular form of communication to communicate with

your target audience (for example, electronic-only vehicles such as e-mails, ...

www.artsincubator.org/content/ marketing/communication_plan.html - 35k -

21) CIO Marketing Resource - Reaching CIO's Audience - Our newsletters are a frequent and consistent communication vehicle, focused on

a targeted audience, and offer direct links to your products and services. ...

www2.cio.com/marketing/reaching/ciocom2.cfm - 12k –

22) Writing to a Global Audience Format de fichier: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Version HTML

communication vehicle is effective in reaching the audience. and conveying the

correct message in a sensitive way. However, writers and communicators whose ...

www.stc.org/confproceed/2001/PDFs/STC48-000022.PDF -

23) How to Plan and Prepare an Effective Presentation Format de fichier: Microsoft Word 97 - Version HTML

Increasingly, audiences want access to the presentation material over the Internet,

and the Internet is becoming the dominant communication vehicle. ...

www.awwa.org/conferences/speakers/ How_to_Plan_and_Prepare_Presentations.doc –

24) CHIP: Getting Started Effectively reaching ―difficult to reach‖ audiences presents significant ...

Appropriate Communication Vehicles [Special Events, Church Bulletins, Radio, ...

www.ecbt.org/CHIPgs.html - 15k -

25) The Health Communication Unit - Step 3- Health Communication ... The third step in

creating a health communication campaign requires you to develop

a better understanding of your audience - based on their preferences, ...

www.thcu.ca/infoandresources/Step3AudienceAnalysis.htm - 19k -

26) NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR RESEARCH ON

CONTRACEPTIVE USE ... Format de fichier: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Version HTML

and examine effective strategies and communication vehicles/channels in Phase 3.

Target Audiences:. These target audiences have been chosen as they have the ...

www.sexualityandu.ca/eng/health/ SOGC_Contraception%20Research_Phase%202_RFP.pdf –

27) iMedia Connection: Extending Your Reach - [ Traduire cette page ] an advertiser is contending with a more diluted communication vehicle by which

Page 68: ANNEX - EUROSFAIRE

68

to reach a member of the target audience. This is not so important when the ...

www.imediaconnection.com/content/2028.asp