ANITA - arXivANITA John F. Cherry1 and Ian M. Shoemaker1 1Department of Physics, University of South...

5
A Sterile Neutrino Origin for the Upward Directed Cosmic Ray Showers Detected by ANITA John F. Cherry 1 and Ian M. Shoemaker 1 1 Department of Physics, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069, USA * (Dated: 8-23-2018) The ANITA balloon experiment has recently observed several EeV cascade events at an angle below the horizon that renders any Standard Model (SM) interpretation unlikely as the Earth is significantly opaque to all SM particles at such energies. In this paper, we study a sterile neutrino interpretation of these events, calculating the angular acceptance of cascades and the relative sensi- tivities of several experiments to a cascade initiated by an EeV sterile neutrino. We find that ANITA is uniquely sensitive to this type of upward directed cascade signal over a wide portion of the sky and from the direction of the two observed events has a transient acceptance roughly equivalent to that of the IceCube experiment. PACS numbers: 13.15.+g, 14.60.St, 14.60.Pq, 98.80.-k 1. Introduction.– The existence of the Cosmic Mi- crowave Background (CMB) has dramatic consequences for the propagation of ultrahigh energy cosmic rays (UHECRs). It was realized almost immediately after the discovery of the CMB that the collisions of UHECRs with CMB relic photons would suppress the CR flux at high energies (the “GZK limit”) [1, 2], and form a source of ultra high-energy (UHE) neutrinos around the EeV (10 18 eV) scale [3] from the subsequent decay of the charged pions produced in these collisions. These neutrinos have remained undetected, perhaps until now. The Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA) was designed to search for these UHE neutrinos by de- tecting the radio pulses produced as the neutrinos tran- sit the Antarctic ice. Recently ANITA reported on the detection of several events emerging at 27.4 o and 35.0 o below the horizon with estimated shower energies of 0.6 EeV (event 3985267) [4] and 0.56 EeV (event 15717147) [5], respectively. Although consistent with the characteristics of a τ lepton cascade, the problem in interpreting these events as due to a ν τ is that the Standard Model (SM) weak interaction is sufficiently strong at these energies to render the Earth quite opaque, with a transmission probability, P T 4 × 10 -6 and P T 2 × 10 -8 , respectively [4, 5] . Mass eigenstates associated with sterile neutrinos may experience weak interactions with suppressed cross sec- tions due to flavor mixing, which would allow them to transit the earth with greater probability. Such states are predicted in many models of neutrino masses, and may even be hinted at by short-baseline neutrino oscillations which appear to favor eV-scale sterile neutrinos [6–12]. Current limits on the allowed mixing angles for e and μ flavors are quite strong, but leave the mixing angle θ τ 4 relatively unconstrained [13]. One can estimate that the mixing angle needed to convert a SM transmission probability P SM T to an O(1) sterile neutrino transmission probability requires a mixing angle θ 2 τ 4 . (log P -1 T ) -1 , or θ τ 4 . 0.2 for the cases in question. We propose that sterile neutrinos may be the origi- nators of these events, which raises the question of the origin of a sterile neutrino flux at the EeV scale. One pos- sibility is the decay of very massive dark matter particles (EeV) into sterile neutrinos, similar to the decaying dark matter scenarios proposed to explain the P eV neu- trino flux observed by IceCube [14–17]. Another possible mechanism involves “sterilizing” an initial SM neutrino flux (presumed to be the original UHE neutrino flux from cosmic rays), which was recently proposed in [18, 19] via a new gauge interaction under which sterile neutrinos are charged [20]. Models of this sort have received re- newed attention [19, 21–32] as a method of reconciling the Planck limits on additional light radiative species [33], with the numerous experimental hints of a light sterile neutrino [6–12]. In this Letter we explore these possibilities in detail. In Sec. 2, we investigate the observation model of the ANITA experiment for such a ν 4 initiated cascade. In Sec. 3, we compare exposure and transient acceptance calculations for a ν 4 initiated cascade. In Sec. 4 we contrast our results with predictions for a standard model neutrino progenitor and discuss future prospects. 2. ANITA Observations .– A sterile neutrino propa- gating in the ν 4 state through the earth will experience the weak interaction through mixing and potentially scat- ter into a SM lepton state. This can produce a τ directly through charged current (CC) interactions with nucleons or it can produce a τ indirectly by first scattering to a ν τ through neutral current (NC) interaction with nucleons which subsequently re-scatters to create a τ , as shown in Fig. 1. Either of these channels can create an upward directed cosmic ray cascade with the properties of the ANITA events 3985267 and 15717147. At EeV energies τ energy loss rates within the earth are sizable due to frequent scattering with nucleons [34], so much so that they will lose most of their energy prior to reaching their decay point. The phenomenon of τ regeneration [35–37] can be neglected here, as any τ which survives to create arXiv:1802.01611v2 [hep-ph] 23 Aug 2018

Transcript of ANITA - arXivANITA John F. Cherry1 and Ian M. Shoemaker1 1Department of Physics, University of South...

Page 1: ANITA - arXivANITA John F. Cherry1 and Ian M. Shoemaker1 1Department of Physics, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069, USA (Dated: 8-23-2018) The ANITA balloon experiment

A Sterile Neutrino Origin for the Upward Directed Cosmic Ray Showers Detected byANITA

John F. Cherry1 and Ian M. Shoemaker1

1Department of Physics, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069, USA∗

(Dated: 8-23-2018)

The ANITA balloon experiment has recently observed several ∼ EeV cascade events at an anglebelow the horizon that renders any Standard Model (SM) interpretation unlikely as the Earth issignificantly opaque to all SM particles at such energies. In this paper, we study a sterile neutrinointerpretation of these events, calculating the angular acceptance of cascades and the relative sensi-tivities of several experiments to a cascade initiated by an EeV sterile neutrino. We find that ANITAis uniquely sensitive to this type of upward directed cascade signal over a wide portion of the skyand from the direction of the two observed events has a transient acceptance roughly equivalent tothat of the IceCube experiment.

PACS numbers: 13.15.+g, 14.60.St, 14.60.Pq, 98.80.-k

1. Introduction. – The existence of the Cosmic Mi-crowave Background (CMB) has dramatic consequencesfor the propagation of ultrahigh energy cosmic rays(UHECRs). It was realized almost immediately after thediscovery of the CMB that the collisions of UHECRs withCMB relic photons would suppress the CR flux at highenergies (the “GZK limit”) [1, 2], and form a source ofultra high-energy (UHE) neutrinos around the EeV (1018

eV) scale [3] from the subsequent decay of the chargedpions produced in these collisions. These neutrinos haveremained undetected, perhaps until now.

The Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA)was designed to search for these UHE neutrinos by de-tecting the radio pulses produced as the neutrinos tran-sit the Antarctic ice. Recently ANITA reported on thedetection of several events emerging at 27.4o and 35.0o

below the horizon with estimated shower energies of∼ 0.6 EeV (event 3985267) [4] and ∼ 0.56 EeV (event15717147) [5], respectively. Although consistent withthe characteristics of a τ lepton cascade, the problemin interpreting these events as due to a ντ is that theStandard Model (SM) weak interaction is sufficientlystrong at these energies to render the Earth quite opaque,with a transmission probability, PT ∼ 4 × 10−6 andPT ∼ 2× 10−8, respectively [4, 5] .

Mass eigenstates associated with sterile neutrinos mayexperience weak interactions with suppressed cross sec-tions due to flavor mixing, which would allow them totransit the earth with greater probability. Such states arepredicted in many models of neutrino masses, and mayeven be hinted at by short-baseline neutrino oscillationswhich appear to favor eV-scale sterile neutrinos [6–12].Current limits on the allowed mixing angles for e andµ flavors are quite strong, but leave the mixing angleθτ4 relatively unconstrained [13]. One can estimate thatthe mixing angle needed to convert a SM transmissionprobability P SM

T to an O(1) sterile neutrino transmissionprobability requires a mixing angle θ2τ4 . (logP−1T )−1,or θτ4 . 0.2 for the cases in question.

We propose that sterile neutrinos may be the origi-nators of these events, which raises the question of theorigin of a sterile neutrino flux at the EeV scale. One pos-sibility is the decay of very massive dark matter particles(∼ EeV) into sterile neutrinos, similar to the decayingdark matter scenarios proposed to explain the PeV neu-trino flux observed by IceCube [14–17]. Another possiblemechanism involves “sterilizing” an initial SM neutrinoflux (presumed to be the original UHE neutrino flux fromcosmic rays), which was recently proposed in [18, 19] viaa new gauge interaction under which sterile neutrinosare charged [20]. Models of this sort have received re-newed attention [19, 21–32] as a method of reconciling thePlanck limits on additional light radiative species [33],with the numerous experimental hints of a light sterileneutrino [6–12].

In this Letter we explore these possibilities in detail.In Sec. 2, we investigate the observation model of theANITA experiment for such a ν4 initiated cascade. InSec. 3, we compare exposure and transient acceptancecalculations for a ν4 initiated cascade. In Sec. 4 wecontrast our results with predictions for a standard modelneutrino progenitor and discuss future prospects.

2. ANITA Observations. – A sterile neutrino propa-gating in the ν4 state through the earth will experiencethe weak interaction through mixing and potentially scat-ter into a SM lepton state. This can produce a τ directlythrough charged current (CC) interactions with nucleonsor it can produce a τ indirectly by first scattering to a ντthrough neutral current (NC) interaction with nucleonswhich subsequently re-scatters to create a τ , as shownin Fig. 1. Either of these channels can create an upwarddirected cosmic ray cascade with the properties of theANITA events 3985267 and 15717147. At EeV energiesτ energy loss rates within the earth are sizable due tofrequent scattering with nucleons [34], so much so thatthey will lose most of their energy prior to reaching theirdecay point. The phenomenon of τ regeneration [35–37]can be neglected here, as any τ which survives to create

arX

iv:1

802.

0161

1v2

[he

p-ph

] 2

3 A

ug 2

018

Page 2: ANITA - arXivANITA John F. Cherry1 and Ian M. Shoemaker1 1Department of Physics, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069, USA (Dated: 8-23-2018) The ANITA balloon experiment

2

ANITA

cascade

CC NC

4

4

lsurf<latexit sha1_base64="nrkpEDFwqVUVgF09imFWqvqkp3M=">AAAB83icbVDLSgNBEOyNrxhfUY9eBoPgKeyKEI8BLx48RDAPyC5hdjKbDJmZXeYhhCW/4cWDIl79GW/+jZNkD5pY0FBUddPdFWecaeP7315pY3Nre6e8W9nbPzg8qh6fdHRqFaFtkvJU9WKsKWeStg0znPYyRbGIOe3Gk9u5332iSrNUPpppRiOBR5IljGDjpJAP8lAJpK1KZoNqza/7C6B1EhSkBgVag+pXOEyJFVQawrHW/cDPTJRjZRjhdFYJraYZJhM8on1HJRZUR/ni5hm6cMoQJalyJQ1aqL8nciy0norYdQpsxnrVm4v/eX1rkpsoZzKzhkqyXJRYjkyK5gGgIVOUGD51BBPF3K2IjLHCxLiYKi6EYPXlddK5qgd+PXi4rjXvizjKcAbncAkBNKAJd9CCNhDI4Ble4c2z3ov37n0sW0teMXMKf+B9/gBE4pHa</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="nrkpEDFwqVUVgF09imFWqvqkp3M=">AAAB83icbVDLSgNBEOyNrxhfUY9eBoPgKeyKEI8BLx48RDAPyC5hdjKbDJmZXeYhhCW/4cWDIl79GW/+jZNkD5pY0FBUddPdFWecaeP7315pY3Nre6e8W9nbPzg8qh6fdHRqFaFtkvJU9WKsKWeStg0znPYyRbGIOe3Gk9u5332iSrNUPpppRiOBR5IljGDjpJAP8lAJpK1KZoNqza/7C6B1EhSkBgVag+pXOEyJFVQawrHW/cDPTJRjZRjhdFYJraYZJhM8on1HJRZUR/ni5hm6cMoQJalyJQ1aqL8nciy0norYdQpsxnrVm4v/eX1rkpsoZzKzhkqyXJRYjkyK5gGgIVOUGD51BBPF3K2IjLHCxLiYKi6EYPXlddK5qgd+PXi4rjXvizjKcAbncAkBNKAJd9CCNhDI4Ble4c2z3ov37n0sW0teMXMKf+B9/gBE4pHa</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="nrkpEDFwqVUVgF09imFWqvqkp3M=">AAAB83icbVDLSgNBEOyNrxhfUY9eBoPgKeyKEI8BLx48RDAPyC5hdjKbDJmZXeYhhCW/4cWDIl79GW/+jZNkD5pY0FBUddPdFWecaeP7315pY3Nre6e8W9nbPzg8qh6fdHRqFaFtkvJU9WKsKWeStg0znPYyRbGIOe3Gk9u5332iSrNUPpppRiOBR5IljGDjpJAP8lAJpK1KZoNqza/7C6B1EhSkBgVag+pXOEyJFVQawrHW/cDPTJRjZRjhdFYJraYZJhM8on1HJRZUR/ni5hm6cMoQJalyJQ1aqL8nciy0norYdQpsxnrVm4v/eX1rkpsoZzKzhkqyXJRYjkyK5gGgIVOUGD51BBPF3K2IjLHCxLiYKi6EYPXlddK5qgd+PXi4rjXvizjKcAbncAkBNKAJd9CCNhDI4Ble4c2z3ov37n0sW0teMXMKf+B9/gBE4pHa</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="nrkpEDFwqVUVgF09imFWqvqkp3M=">AAAB83icbVDLSgNBEOyNrxhfUY9eBoPgKeyKEI8BLx48RDAPyC5hdjKbDJmZXeYhhCW/4cWDIl79GW/+jZNkD5pY0FBUddPdFWecaeP7315pY3Nre6e8W9nbPzg8qh6fdHRqFaFtkvJU9WKsKWeStg0znPYyRbGIOe3Gk9u5332iSrNUPpppRiOBR5IljGDjpJAP8lAJpK1KZoNqza/7C6B1EhSkBgVag+pXOEyJFVQawrHW/cDPTJRjZRjhdFYJraYZJhM8on1HJRZUR/ni5hm6cMoQJalyJQ1aqL8nciy0norYdQpsxnrVm4v/eX1rkpsoZzKzhkqyXJRYjkyK5gGgIVOUGD51BBPF3K2IjLHCxLiYKi6EYPXlddK5qgd+PXi4rjXvizjKcAbncAkBNKAJd9CCNhDI4Ble4c2z3ov37n0sW0teMXMKf+B9/gBE4pHa</latexit>

lANITA<latexit sha1_base64="axtHkGlzOID4BrH6omaIOCXV994=">AAAB9HicbVBNSwMxEJ2tX7V+VT16CRbBU9kVQY8tXhREKvQL2qVk02wbmmTXJFsoS3+HFw+KePXHePPfmLZ70NYHA4/3ZpiZF8ScaeO6305ubX1jcyu/XdjZ3ds/KB4eNXWUKEIbJOKRagdYU84kbRhmOG3HimIRcNoKRjczvzWmSrNI1s0kpr7AA8lCRrCxks97aVcJVH24q1envWLJLbtzoFXiZaQEGWq94le3H5FEUGkIx1p3PDc2foqVYYTTaaGbaBpjMsID2rFUYkG1n86PnqIzq/RRGClb0qC5+nsixULriQhsp8BmqJe9mfif10lMeO2nTMaJoZIsFoUJRyZCswRQnylKDJ9Ygoli9lZEhlhhYmxOBRuCt/zyKmlelD237D1elir3WRx5OIFTOAcPrqACt1CDBhB4gmd4hTdn7Lw4787HojXnZDPH8AfO5w/ubpGR</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="axtHkGlzOID4BrH6omaIOCXV994=">AAAB9HicbVBNSwMxEJ2tX7V+VT16CRbBU9kVQY8tXhREKvQL2qVk02wbmmTXJFsoS3+HFw+KePXHePPfmLZ70NYHA4/3ZpiZF8ScaeO6305ubX1jcyu/XdjZ3ds/KB4eNXWUKEIbJOKRagdYU84kbRhmOG3HimIRcNoKRjczvzWmSrNI1s0kpr7AA8lCRrCxks97aVcJVH24q1envWLJLbtzoFXiZaQEGWq94le3H5FEUGkIx1p3PDc2foqVYYTTaaGbaBpjMsID2rFUYkG1n86PnqIzq/RRGClb0qC5+nsixULriQhsp8BmqJe9mfif10lMeO2nTMaJoZIsFoUJRyZCswRQnylKDJ9Ygoli9lZEhlhhYmxOBRuCt/zyKmlelD237D1elir3WRx5OIFTOAcPrqACt1CDBhB4gmd4hTdn7Lw4787HojXnZDPH8AfO5w/ubpGR</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="axtHkGlzOID4BrH6omaIOCXV994=">AAAB9HicbVBNSwMxEJ2tX7V+VT16CRbBU9kVQY8tXhREKvQL2qVk02wbmmTXJFsoS3+HFw+KePXHePPfmLZ70NYHA4/3ZpiZF8ScaeO6305ubX1jcyu/XdjZ3ds/KB4eNXWUKEIbJOKRagdYU84kbRhmOG3HimIRcNoKRjczvzWmSrNI1s0kpr7AA8lCRrCxks97aVcJVH24q1envWLJLbtzoFXiZaQEGWq94le3H5FEUGkIx1p3PDc2foqVYYTTaaGbaBpjMsID2rFUYkG1n86PnqIzq/RRGClb0qC5+nsixULriQhsp8BmqJe9mfif10lMeO2nTMaJoZIsFoUJRyZCswRQnylKDJ9Ygoli9lZEhlhhYmxOBRuCt/zyKmlelD237D1elir3WRx5OIFTOAcPrqACt1CDBhB4gmd4hTdn7Lw4787HojXnZDPH8AfO5w/ubpGR</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="axtHkGlzOID4BrH6omaIOCXV994=">AAAB9HicbVBNSwMxEJ2tX7V+VT16CRbBU9kVQY8tXhREKvQL2qVk02wbmmTXJFsoS3+HFw+KePXHePPfmLZ70NYHA4/3ZpiZF8ScaeO6305ubX1jcyu/XdjZ3ds/KB4eNXWUKEIbJOKRagdYU84kbRhmOG3HimIRcNoKRjczvzWmSrNI1s0kpr7AA8lCRrCxks97aVcJVH24q1envWLJLbtzoFXiZaQEGWq94le3H5FEUGkIx1p3PDc2foqVYYTTaaGbaBpjMsID2rFUYkG1n86PnqIzq/RRGClb0qC5+nsixULriQhsp8BmqJe9mfif10lMeO2nTMaJoZIsFoUJRyZCswRQnylKDJ9Ygoli9lZEhlhhYmxOBRuCt/zyKmlelD237D1elir3WRx5OIFTOAcPrqACt1CDBhB4gmd4hTdn7Lw4787HojXnZDPH8AfO5w/ubpGR</latexit>

lsh<latexit sha1_base64="mntfeXYFKOWQzjFxGdK44nn6uGU=">AAAB8XicbVA9SwNBEJ2LXzF+RS1tFoNgFe5E0DJgY2ERwXxgcoS9zSRZsrt37O4J4ci/sLFQxNZ/Y+e/cZNcoYkPBh7vzTAzL0oEN9b3v73C2vrG5lZxu7Szu7d/UD48apo41QwbLBaxbkfUoOAKG5Zbge1EI5WRwFY0vpn5rSfUhsfqwU4SDCUdKj7gjFonPYpe1tWSmNG0V674VX8OskqCnFQgR71X/ur2Y5ZKVJYJakwn8BMbZlRbzgROS93UYELZmA6x46iiEk2YzS+ekjOn9Mkg1q6UJXP190RGpTETGblOSe3ILHsz8T+vk9rBdZhxlaQWFVssGqSC2JjM3id9rpFZMXGEMs3drYSNqKbMupBKLoRg+eVV0ryoBn41uL+s1O7yOIpwAqdwDgFcQQ1uoQ4NYKDgGV7hzTPei/fufSxaC14+cwx/4H3+AJdZkOE=</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="mntfeXYFKOWQzjFxGdK44nn6uGU=">AAAB8XicbVA9SwNBEJ2LXzF+RS1tFoNgFe5E0DJgY2ERwXxgcoS9zSRZsrt37O4J4ci/sLFQxNZ/Y+e/cZNcoYkPBh7vzTAzL0oEN9b3v73C2vrG5lZxu7Szu7d/UD48apo41QwbLBaxbkfUoOAKG5Zbge1EI5WRwFY0vpn5rSfUhsfqwU4SDCUdKj7gjFonPYpe1tWSmNG0V674VX8OskqCnFQgR71X/ur2Y5ZKVJYJakwn8BMbZlRbzgROS93UYELZmA6x46iiEk2YzS+ekjOn9Mkg1q6UJXP190RGpTETGblOSe3ILHsz8T+vk9rBdZhxlaQWFVssGqSC2JjM3id9rpFZMXGEMs3drYSNqKbMupBKLoRg+eVV0ryoBn41uL+s1O7yOIpwAqdwDgFcQQ1uoQ4NYKDgGV7hzTPei/fufSxaC14+cwx/4H3+AJdZkOE=</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="mntfeXYFKOWQzjFxGdK44nn6uGU=">AAAB8XicbVA9SwNBEJ2LXzF+RS1tFoNgFe5E0DJgY2ERwXxgcoS9zSRZsrt37O4J4ci/sLFQxNZ/Y+e/cZNcoYkPBh7vzTAzL0oEN9b3v73C2vrG5lZxu7Szu7d/UD48apo41QwbLBaxbkfUoOAKG5Zbge1EI5WRwFY0vpn5rSfUhsfqwU4SDCUdKj7gjFonPYpe1tWSmNG0V674VX8OskqCnFQgR71X/ur2Y5ZKVJYJakwn8BMbZlRbzgROS93UYELZmA6x46iiEk2YzS+ekjOn9Mkg1q6UJXP190RGpTETGblOSe3ILHsz8T+vk9rBdZhxlaQWFVssGqSC2JjM3id9rpFZMXGEMs3drYSNqKbMupBKLoRg+eVV0ryoBn41uL+s1O7yOIpwAqdwDgFcQQ1uoQ4NYKDgGV7hzTPei/fufSxaC14+cwx/4H3+AJdZkOE=</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="mntfeXYFKOWQzjFxGdK44nn6uGU=">AAAB8XicbVA9SwNBEJ2LXzF+RS1tFoNgFe5E0DJgY2ERwXxgcoS9zSRZsrt37O4J4ci/sLFQxNZ/Y+e/cZNcoYkPBh7vzTAzL0oEN9b3v73C2vrG5lZxu7Szu7d/UD48apo41QwbLBaxbkfUoOAKG5Zbge1EI5WRwFY0vpn5rSfUhsfqwU4SDCUdKj7gjFonPYpe1tWSmNG0V674VX8OskqCnFQgR71X/ur2Y5ZKVJYJakwn8BMbZlRbzgROS93UYELZmA6x46iiEk2YzS+ekjOn9Mkg1q6UJXP190RGpTETGblOSe3ILHsz8T+vk9rBdZhxlaQWFVssGqSC2JjM3id9rpFZMXGEMs3drYSNqKbMupBKLoRg+eVV0ryoBn41uL+s1O7yOIpwAqdwDgFcQQ1uoQ4NYKDgGV7hzTPei/fufSxaC14+cwx/4H3+AJdZkOE=</latexit>

obs<latexit sha1_base64="FQwOnBUBB+lHlzGQa/axaIG6tYo=">AAAB+XicbVBNS8NAEN3Ur1q/oh69LBbBU0lE0GPRi8cK9gOaEDbbTbt0dxN2J4US+k+8eFDEq//Em//GbZuDtj4YeLw3w8y8OBPcgOd9O5WNza3tnepubW//4PDIPT7pmDTXlLVpKlLdi4lhgivWBg6C9TLNiIwF68bj+7nfnTBteKqeYJqxUJKh4gmnBKwUuW4AIwYkKgItcRqbWeTWvYa3AF4nfknqqEQrcr+CQUpzyRRQQYzp+14GYUE0cCrYrBbkhmWEjsmQ9S1VRDITFovLZ/jCKgOcpNqWArxQf08URBozlbHtlARGZtWbi/95/RyS27DgKsuBKbpclOQCQ4rnMeAB14yCmFpCqOb2VkxHRBMKNqyaDcFffXmddK4avtfwH6/rzbsyjio6Q+foEvnoBjXRA2qhNqJogp7RK3pzCufFeXc+lq0Vp5w5RX/gfP4AuLmTsw==</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="FQwOnBUBB+lHlzGQa/axaIG6tYo=">AAAB+XicbVBNS8NAEN3Ur1q/oh69LBbBU0lE0GPRi8cK9gOaEDbbTbt0dxN2J4US+k+8eFDEq//Em//GbZuDtj4YeLw3w8y8OBPcgOd9O5WNza3tnepubW//4PDIPT7pmDTXlLVpKlLdi4lhgivWBg6C9TLNiIwF68bj+7nfnTBteKqeYJqxUJKh4gmnBKwUuW4AIwYkKgItcRqbWeTWvYa3AF4nfknqqEQrcr+CQUpzyRRQQYzp+14GYUE0cCrYrBbkhmWEjsmQ9S1VRDITFovLZ/jCKgOcpNqWArxQf08URBozlbHtlARGZtWbi/95/RyS27DgKsuBKbpclOQCQ4rnMeAB14yCmFpCqOb2VkxHRBMKNqyaDcFffXmddK4avtfwH6/rzbsyjio6Q+foEvnoBjXRA2qhNqJogp7RK3pzCufFeXc+lq0Vp5w5RX/gfP4AuLmTsw==</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="FQwOnBUBB+lHlzGQa/axaIG6tYo=">AAAB+XicbVBNS8NAEN3Ur1q/oh69LBbBU0lE0GPRi8cK9gOaEDbbTbt0dxN2J4US+k+8eFDEq//Em//GbZuDtj4YeLw3w8y8OBPcgOd9O5WNza3tnepubW//4PDIPT7pmDTXlLVpKlLdi4lhgivWBg6C9TLNiIwF68bj+7nfnTBteKqeYJqxUJKh4gmnBKwUuW4AIwYkKgItcRqbWeTWvYa3AF4nfknqqEQrcr+CQUpzyRRQQYzp+14GYUE0cCrYrBbkhmWEjsmQ9S1VRDITFovLZ/jCKgOcpNqWArxQf08URBozlbHtlARGZtWbi/95/RyS27DgKsuBKbpclOQCQ4rnMeAB14yCmFpCqOb2VkxHRBMKNqyaDcFffXmddK4avtfwH6/rzbsyjio6Q+foEvnoBjXRA2qhNqJogp7RK3pzCufFeXc+lq0Vp5w5RX/gfP4AuLmTsw==</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="FQwOnBUBB+lHlzGQa/axaIG6tYo=">AAAB+XicbVBNS8NAEN3Ur1q/oh69LBbBU0lE0GPRi8cK9gOaEDbbTbt0dxN2J4US+k+8eFDEq//Em//GbZuDtj4YeLw3w8y8OBPcgOd9O5WNza3tnepubW//4PDIPT7pmDTXlLVpKlLdi4lhgivWBg6C9TLNiIwF68bj+7nfnTBteKqeYJqxUJKh4gmnBKwUuW4AIwYkKgItcRqbWeTWvYa3AF4nfknqqEQrcr+CQUpzyRRQQYzp+14GYUE0cCrYrBbkhmWEjsmQ9S1VRDITFovLZ/jCKgOcpNqWArxQf08URBozlbHtlARGZtWbi/95/RyS27DgKsuBKbpclOQCQ4rnMeAB14yCmFpCqOb2VkxHRBMKNqyaDcFffXmddK4avtfwH6/rzbsyjio6Q+foEvnoBjXRA2qhNqJogp7RK3pzCufFeXc+lq0Vp5w5RX/gfP4AuLmTsw==</latexit>

em<latexit sha1_base64="BtXfZkd2GtRprlxqYhs3kZ9RLdQ=">AAAB+HicbVDLSgNBEJz1GeMjqx69DAbBU9gVQY9BLx4jmAckIcxOepMhM7PLTK8Ql3yJFw+KePVTvPk3Th4HTSxoKKq66e6KUiksBsG3t7a+sbm1Xdgp7u7tH5T8w6OGTTLDoc4TmZhWxCxIoaGOAiW0UgNMRRKa0eh26jcfwViR6Accp9BVbKBFLDhDJ/X8UgeHgKyXd4yioCY9vxxUghnoKgkXpEwWqPX8r04/4ZkCjVwya9thkGI3ZwYFlzApdjILKeMjNoC2o5opsN18dviEnjmlT+PEuNJIZ+rviZwpa8cqcp2K4dAue1PxP6+dYXzdzYVOMwTN54viTFJM6DQF2hcGOMqxI4wb4W6lfMgM4+iyKroQwuWXV0njohIGlfD+sly9WcRRICfklJyTkFyRKrkjNVInnGTkmbySN+/Je/HevY9565q3mDkmf+B9/gDgz5M3</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="BtXfZkd2GtRprlxqYhs3kZ9RLdQ=">AAAB+HicbVDLSgNBEJz1GeMjqx69DAbBU9gVQY9BLx4jmAckIcxOepMhM7PLTK8Ql3yJFw+KePVTvPk3Th4HTSxoKKq66e6KUiksBsG3t7a+sbm1Xdgp7u7tH5T8w6OGTTLDoc4TmZhWxCxIoaGOAiW0UgNMRRKa0eh26jcfwViR6Accp9BVbKBFLDhDJ/X8UgeHgKyXd4yioCY9vxxUghnoKgkXpEwWqPX8r04/4ZkCjVwya9thkGI3ZwYFlzApdjILKeMjNoC2o5opsN18dviEnjmlT+PEuNJIZ+rviZwpa8cqcp2K4dAue1PxP6+dYXzdzYVOMwTN54viTFJM6DQF2hcGOMqxI4wb4W6lfMgM4+iyKroQwuWXV0njohIGlfD+sly9WcRRICfklJyTkFyRKrkjNVInnGTkmbySN+/Je/HevY9565q3mDkmf+B9/gDgz5M3</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="BtXfZkd2GtRprlxqYhs3kZ9RLdQ=">AAAB+HicbVDLSgNBEJz1GeMjqx69DAbBU9gVQY9BLx4jmAckIcxOepMhM7PLTK8Ql3yJFw+KePVTvPk3Th4HTSxoKKq66e6KUiksBsG3t7a+sbm1Xdgp7u7tH5T8w6OGTTLDoc4TmZhWxCxIoaGOAiW0UgNMRRKa0eh26jcfwViR6Accp9BVbKBFLDhDJ/X8UgeHgKyXd4yioCY9vxxUghnoKgkXpEwWqPX8r04/4ZkCjVwya9thkGI3ZwYFlzApdjILKeMjNoC2o5opsN18dviEnjmlT+PEuNJIZ+rviZwpa8cqcp2K4dAue1PxP6+dYXzdzYVOMwTN54viTFJM6DQF2hcGOMqxI4wb4W6lfMgM4+iyKroQwuWXV0njohIGlfD+sly9WcRRICfklJyTkFyRKrkjNVInnGTkmbySN+/Je/HevY9565q3mDkmf+B9/gDgz5M3</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="BtXfZkd2GtRprlxqYhs3kZ9RLdQ=">AAAB+HicbVDLSgNBEJz1GeMjqx69DAbBU9gVQY9BLx4jmAckIcxOepMhM7PLTK8Ql3yJFw+KePVTvPk3Th4HTSxoKKq66e6KUiksBsG3t7a+sbm1Xdgp7u7tH5T8w6OGTTLDoc4TmZhWxCxIoaGOAiW0UgNMRRKa0eh26jcfwViR6Accp9BVbKBFLDhDJ/X8UgeHgKyXd4yioCY9vxxUghnoKgkXpEwWqPX8r04/4ZkCjVwya9thkGI3ZwYFlzApdjILKeMjNoC2o5opsN18dviEnjmlT+PEuNJIZ+rviZwpa8cqcp2K4dAue1PxP6+dYXzdzYVOMwTN54viTFJM6DQF2hcGOMqxI4wb4W6lfMgM4+iyKroQwuWXV0njohIGlfD+sly9WcRRICfklJyTkFyRKrkjNVInnGTkmbySN+/Je/HevY9565q3mDkmf+B9/gDgz5M3</latexit>

<latexit sha1_base64="XKjhEsBPdO97HEFmYp3hhmTSFlw=">AAAB63icbVA9SwNBEJ2LXzF+RS1tFoNgFe5E0DJgY2ERwcRAcoS9zSZZsrt37M4J4chfsLFQxNY/ZOe/cS+5QhMfDDzem2FmXpRIYdH3v73S2vrG5lZ5u7Kzu7d/UD08ats4NYy3WCxj04mo5VJo3kKBkncSw6mKJH+MJje5//jEjRWxfsBpwkNFR1oMBaOYSz2kab9a8+v+HGSVBAWpQYFmv/rVG8QsVVwjk9TabuAnGGbUoGCSzyq91PKEsgkd8a6jmipuw2x+64ycOWVAhrFxpZHM1d8TGVXWTlXkOhXFsV32cvE/r5vi8DrMhE5S5JotFg1TSTAm+eNkIAxnKKeOUGaEu5WwMTWUoYun4kIIll9eJe2LeuDXg/vLWuOuiKMMJ3AK5xDAFTTgFprQAgZjeIZXePOU9+K9ex+L1pJXzBzDH3ifPyQvjlI=</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="XKjhEsBPdO97HEFmYp3hhmTSFlw=">AAAB63icbVA9SwNBEJ2LXzF+RS1tFoNgFe5E0DJgY2ERwcRAcoS9zSZZsrt37M4J4chfsLFQxNY/ZOe/cS+5QhMfDDzem2FmXpRIYdH3v73S2vrG5lZ5u7Kzu7d/UD08ats4NYy3WCxj04mo5VJo3kKBkncSw6mKJH+MJje5//jEjRWxfsBpwkNFR1oMBaOYSz2kab9a8+v+HGSVBAWpQYFmv/rVG8QsVVwjk9TabuAnGGbUoGCSzyq91PKEsgkd8a6jmipuw2x+64ycOWVAhrFxpZHM1d8TGVXWTlXkOhXFsV32cvE/r5vi8DrMhE5S5JotFg1TSTAm+eNkIAxnKKeOUGaEu5WwMTWUoYun4kIIll9eJe2LeuDXg/vLWuOuiKMMJ3AK5xDAFTTgFprQAgZjeIZXePOU9+K9ex+L1pJXzBzDH3ifPyQvjlI=</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="XKjhEsBPdO97HEFmYp3hhmTSFlw=">AAAB63icbVA9SwNBEJ2LXzF+RS1tFoNgFe5E0DJgY2ERwcRAcoS9zSZZsrt37M4J4chfsLFQxNY/ZOe/cS+5QhMfDDzem2FmXpRIYdH3v73S2vrG5lZ5u7Kzu7d/UD08ats4NYy3WCxj04mo5VJo3kKBkncSw6mKJH+MJje5//jEjRWxfsBpwkNFR1oMBaOYSz2kab9a8+v+HGSVBAWpQYFmv/rVG8QsVVwjk9TabuAnGGbUoGCSzyq91PKEsgkd8a6jmipuw2x+64ycOWVAhrFxpZHM1d8TGVXWTlXkOhXFsV32cvE/r5vi8DrMhE5S5JotFg1TSTAm+eNkIAxnKKeOUGaEu5WwMTWUoYun4kIIll9eJe2LeuDXg/vLWuOuiKMMJ3AK5xDAFTTgFprQAgZjeIZXePOU9+K9ex+L1pJXzBzDH3ifPyQvjlI=</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="XKjhEsBPdO97HEFmYp3hhmTSFlw=">AAAB63icbVA9SwNBEJ2LXzF+RS1tFoNgFe5E0DJgY2ERwcRAcoS9zSZZsrt37M4J4chfsLFQxNY/ZOe/cS+5QhMfDDzem2FmXpRIYdH3v73S2vrG5lZ5u7Kzu7d/UD08ats4NYy3WCxj04mo5VJo3kKBkncSw6mKJH+MJje5//jEjRWxfsBpwkNFR1oMBaOYSz2kab9a8+v+HGSVBAWpQYFmv/rVG8QsVVwjk9TabuAnGGbUoGCSzyq91PKEsgkd8a6jmipuw2x+64ycOWVAhrFxpZHM1d8TGVXWTlXkOhXFsV32cvE/r5vi8DrMhE5S5JotFg1TSTAm+eNkIAxnKKeOUGaEu5WwMTWUoYun4kIIll9eJe2LeuDXg/vLWuOuiKMMJ3AK5xDAFTTgFprQAgZjeIZXePOU9+K9ex+L1pJXzBzDH3ifPyQvjlI=</latexit>

<latexit sha1_base64="XKjhEsBPdO97HEFmYp3hhmTSFlw=">AAAB63icbVA9SwNBEJ2LXzF+RS1tFoNgFe5E0DJgY2ERwcRAcoS9zSZZsrt37M4J4chfsLFQxNY/ZOe/cS+5QhMfDDzem2FmXpRIYdH3v73S2vrG5lZ5u7Kzu7d/UD08ats4NYy3WCxj04mo5VJo3kKBkncSw6mKJH+MJje5//jEjRWxfsBpwkNFR1oMBaOYSz2kab9a8+v+HGSVBAWpQYFmv/rVG8QsVVwjk9TabuAnGGbUoGCSzyq91PKEsgkd8a6jmipuw2x+64ycOWVAhrFxpZHM1d8TGVXWTlXkOhXFsV32cvE/r5vi8DrMhE5S5JotFg1TSTAm+eNkIAxnKKeOUGaEu5WwMTWUoYun4kIIll9eJe2LeuDXg/vLWuOuiKMMJ3AK5xDAFTTgFprQAgZjeIZXePOU9+K9ex+L1pJXzBzDH3ifPyQvjlI=</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="XKjhEsBPdO97HEFmYp3hhmTSFlw=">AAAB63icbVA9SwNBEJ2LXzF+RS1tFoNgFe5E0DJgY2ERwcRAcoS9zSZZsrt37M4J4chfsLFQxNY/ZOe/cS+5QhMfDDzem2FmXpRIYdH3v73S2vrG5lZ5u7Kzu7d/UD08ats4NYy3WCxj04mo5VJo3kKBkncSw6mKJH+MJje5//jEjRWxfsBpwkNFR1oMBaOYSz2kab9a8+v+HGSVBAWpQYFmv/rVG8QsVVwjk9TabuAnGGbUoGCSzyq91PKEsgkd8a6jmipuw2x+64ycOWVAhrFxpZHM1d8TGVXWTlXkOhXFsV32cvE/r5vi8DrMhE5S5JotFg1TSTAm+eNkIAxnKKeOUGaEu5WwMTWUoYun4kIIll9eJe2LeuDXg/vLWuOuiKMMJ3AK5xDAFTTgFprQAgZjeIZXePOU9+K9ex+L1pJXzBzDH3ifPyQvjlI=</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="XKjhEsBPdO97HEFmYp3hhmTSFlw=">AAAB63icbVA9SwNBEJ2LXzF+RS1tFoNgFe5E0DJgY2ERwcRAcoS9zSZZsrt37M4J4chfsLFQxNY/ZOe/cS+5QhMfDDzem2FmXpRIYdH3v73S2vrG5lZ5u7Kzu7d/UD08ats4NYy3WCxj04mo5VJo3kKBkncSw6mKJH+MJje5//jEjRWxfsBpwkNFR1oMBaOYSz2kab9a8+v+HGSVBAWpQYFmv/rVG8QsVVwjk9TabuAnGGbUoGCSzyq91PKEsgkd8a6jmipuw2x+64ycOWVAhrFxpZHM1d8TGVXWTlXkOhXFsV32cvE/r5vi8DrMhE5S5JotFg1TSTAm+eNkIAxnKKeOUGaEu5WwMTWUoYun4kIIll9eJe2LeuDXg/vLWuOuiKMMJ3AK5xDAFTTgFprQAgZjeIZXePOU9+K9ex+L1pJXzBzDH3ifPyQvjlI=</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="XKjhEsBPdO97HEFmYp3hhmTSFlw=">AAAB63icbVA9SwNBEJ2LXzF+RS1tFoNgFe5E0DJgY2ERwcRAcoS9zSZZsrt37M4J4chfsLFQxNY/ZOe/cS+5QhMfDDzem2FmXpRIYdH3v73S2vrG5lZ5u7Kzu7d/UD08ats4NYy3WCxj04mo5VJo3kKBkncSw6mKJH+MJje5//jEjRWxfsBpwkNFR1oMBaOYSz2kab9a8+v+HGSVBAWpQYFmv/rVG8QsVVwjk9TabuAnGGbUoGCSzyq91PKEsgkd8a6jmipuw2x+64ycOWVAhrFxpZHM1d8TGVXWTlXkOhXFsV32cvE/r5vi8DrMhE5S5JotFg1TSTAm+eNkIAxnKKeOUGaEu5WwMTWUoYun4kIIll9eJe2LeuDXg/vLWuOuiKMMJ3AK5xDAFTTgFprQAgZjeIZXePOU9+K9ex+L1pJXzBzDH3ifPyQvjlI=</latexit>

FIG. 1: A cartoon for the production of a sterile neutrino-induced upward pointing cosmic ray shower. The ν4 can di-rectly produce a shower through CC interactions (left track)or scattering into a ντ flavor state via a NC interaction whichthen propagates and produces a cascade (right track).

an EeV energy cascade will not have undergone a fullregeneration cycle.

For the purpose of calculating ANITA’s sensitivityto ν4 initiated cascades we follow as closely as possi-ble the collaborations own prescription for the detectionof τ ’s created by SM neutrino interactions within theearth [34, 38, 39], modified suitably for the propagationand interaction of ν4. The transient point source accep-tance for the ANITA experiment, along a chord, l, atobserving angle θobs, is given by the expression,

Ai (Eν , θobs) =

∫ l(θobs)

0

dPi (Eν , x)

dxPτ,surf (Eν , x) 〈Ash〉dx ,

(1)where x is the position coordinate along l (θobs), and theindex i runs over the CC and NC interaction channels.

A ν4 state, in the limit that the mixing with SM neutri-nos is dominated by θτ4, will have a likelihood to interactwithin the earth’s mantle of,

dPCC (Eν , x)

dx= n (x) sin2 θτ4σCC (Eν) e−ODν4

(Eν ,x) ,

(2)with the nucleon number density, n (x), given by thePREM density model [40], weak interaction charged cur-rent (CC) and neutral current (NC) cross sections takenfrom [41], and the total transmission optical depth for aν4 state, ODν4 . The fraction of the decay lifetime of a τproduced in the crust, fp, decreases the probability thatit will reach the surface,

fp (Eν , x) =

∫ l(θobs)−x

0

dl

ldecay (Eν , l), (3)

where the instantaneous decay length along the trajec-tory is cτdecay (Eν , l). To calculate the instantaneous τ

decay length we take the initial τ energy to be Eτ =0.8Eν and the energy loss rate of τ leptons in Earth istaken from [34]. The emergence probability that a τ cre-ated in an interaction within the earth is then simplyPτ,surf (Eν , x) = e−fp(Eν ,x). The final emerging τ en-ergy, Eτ , is likewise computed following the ALLM modelof [34]. This information is then used to compute the av-erage area of an ANITA detectable τ decay shower,

〈Ash〉 =

∫ lANITA

0

dPsh (Eτ , fp)

dlAsh (Eτ , lsh) dl . (4)

Here the detectable shower area, Ash (Eτ , lsh), is cal-culated from the electromagnetic shower strength atdistance, lsh, and ANITA detection threshold of [39],and this is averaged with the τ decay probability,Psh (Eτ , fp) = e−(l/ldecay(Eτ )+fp), accounting for the frac-tion of a decay lifetime each τ has already spent insidethe crust. It should be noted that Equation (4.2) of [39]contains a significant, and as of this writing uncorrected,typographical error which gives the inverse of the truedependence of the electromagnetic field strength on lsh.

For the double interaction case, where a ν4 first scattersinto a ντ via NC interactions with nucleons, we modifyEq. 2 as follows,

dPNC (Eν , x)

dx= n (x)σCC (Eν)Pν4→ντ (Eν , x) , (5)

where Pν4→ντ (Eν , x) is the transmission probability av-erage over histories of possible midpoints for the ν4 → ντNC interaction,

Pν4→ντ (Eν , x) =

∫ x

0

e−ODντdPCC (Eν , x

′)

dx′σNC

σCCdx′ ,

(6)where ODντ is the transmission optical depth of a ντ ofenergy Eν from the midpoint, x′, to the end point x.

The transient point source acceptance for ANITA isthen the sum over Eq. 1 including both channels. Tocalculate the total exposure of ANITA to ν4 initiatedcascades we integrate,

Exp (Eν) =∑

i=CC,NC

∫ ∫Ai (Eν , θobs) dΩobsdt . (7)

3. Exposure and Transient Acceptance. –To gauge the the likelihood that ANITA’s two anoma-

lous cascade events may arise from ν4 initiated cascades,we compare our calculation of ANITA’s exposure andtransient acceptance to predictions for the IceCube neu-trino observatory and the AUGER cosmic ray observa-tory. Given that the AUGER experiment samples onlya narrow ∼ .5o band near the horizon in their search forastro-physical neutrinos [42], their exposure need only beadjusted for the reduced weak interaction cross section ofν4 in order to compare with ANITA. IceCube, becauseit is capable of observing the entire sky simultaneously,

Page 3: ANITA - arXivANITA John F. Cherry1 and Ian M. Shoemaker1 1Department of Physics, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069, USA (Dated: 8-23-2018) The ANITA balloon experiment

3

108 109 1010 1011

Initial ν4 Energy (GeV)

1012

1013

1014

1015

1016

1017

Expo

sure

( cm

2sr

s)

ANITA (2018)IceCube (2017)AUGER (2015)

FIG. 2: The total isotropic exposure for the detection of up-ward directed τ decay cascades provided by the bulk of theearth, assuming an initial ν4 progenitor and a mixing angleof θτ4 = 0.1.

has significantly increased exposure when mixing anglesare sufficiently small that the Earth is transparent to ν4.To compare with ANITA, we repeat the evaluation ofEqs. 1, 7 for the IceCube detector making the replace-ment 〈Ash〉 → ΩICl

2surf , where ΩIC is the angular size of

the IceCube detector as viewed from the point of cre-ation of the τ lepton, and add this to the IceCube col-laboration’s calculation of their exposure UHE SM neu-trinos [43] adjusted appropriately for the reduced crosssection of ν4. In what follows, we will assume a large butstill allowed value of θτ4 = 0.1 for all calculations.

Figure 2 shows the total exposure of ANITA as com-pared to IceCube and the AUGER experiments. Dueto the ANITA balloon’s limited flight time, it has theleast total exposure of all experiments considered. Com-pared to IceCube, ANITA has ∼ 10− 20 times less totalexposure in the ν4 energy ranges which might explainthe anomalous cascades they have observed. The lack ofany τ leptons observed emerging from the earth in theEeV energy range by the IceCube experiment stronglydisfavors an isotropic background of ν4 as the source ofANITA’s two upward directed UHECR like events.

Another possibility, which has been mentioned in thecontext of SM neutrino sources by the ANITA collabo-ration [5], is that the upward directed cascades are theresult of transient phenomena such as gamma-ray bursts(GRB) or supernovae (SNe). In Figure 3 we show thetransient point source acceptance of both ANITA andIceCube for a ν4 initiated cascade with Eν = 1 EeV alongside the arrival direction of the two anomalous cascades.

9080706050403020100Observing Angle (deg)

105

106

107

108

Tran

sien

t Acc

epta

nce

( cm

2)

Event 3985267

Event 15717147

ANITAIceCube

FIG. 3: The transient acceptance for ANITA and IceCube,assuming a mixing angle of θτ4 = 0.1 and an initial neutrinoenergy of Eν = 1 EeV. Shown in gray and tan are the recon-structed trajectories of the ANITA events.

We find that the events fall in the portion of the skywhere ANITA and IceCube have roughly equal accep-tances, with detection of event 3985267 slightly favoredby ANITA and event 15717147 slightly favoring IceCube.

If we consider these two events as ν4 initiated τ lep-ton decay cascades we can crudely estimate the relativelikelihood that either ANITA or IceCube would have ob-served each, assuming that the transient flux is such thatthe total expected number of events is one, summed overIceCube and ANITA acceptances, with an initial neu-trino energy of Eν = 1 EeV. Table I shows the resultsof this estimate. We find that at the observing angles ofthese two events the likelihood of ANITA observing bothwhile IceCube detects nothing is roughly equivalent to afair coin landing on the same side twice in a row.

TABLE I: Relative Likelihood

Event 3985267 Event 15717147

ANITA 60% 40%

IceCube 40% 60%

In Figure 4 we show the region where the ANITA ex-periment is comparably sensitive to IceCube for transientsources of ν4 in terms of initial neutrino energy and ob-serving angle. Because the cascade observation of ANITAdoes not put a limit on how much τ energy was lost dur-ing propagation through the earth prior to decay, the cas-cade energies provide only a lower bound on the initialneutrino energy. The ANITA experiment’s loss of relativesensitivity at observing angles much below θobs ∼ −40o

Page 4: ANITA - arXivANITA John F. Cherry1 and Ian M. Shoemaker1 1Department of Physics, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069, USA (Dated: 8-23-2018) The ANITA balloon experiment

4

50403020100Observing Angle (deg)

108

109

1010

1011

1012

( GeV

)

Event 3985267

Event 15717147

AANITA/AIceCube>1

AANITA/AIceCube>0.5

AANITA/AIceCube>0.25

FIG. 4: The acceptance ratio of ANITA to IceCube, assum-ing an initial ν4 progenitor with a mixing angle of θτ4 = 0.1.Shown in grey and tan are the 1σ uncertainties for the tra-jectories and energies of ANITA event 3985267 and event15717147, respectively.

is due to several factors including angular sensitivity andalignment of the polarized antenna array [38], and short-ening of the surface distance lANITA which simultane-ously reduces the average shower distance and increasesthe likelihood that a τ with high grammage will pass theexperiment prior to decay. At initial neutrino energiesmuch less than Eν < 0.3 EeV, ANITA suffers a loss ofrelative sensitivity due to the reduced strength of theelectromagnetic shower [39].

4. Discussion and Conclusions. – The primary moti-vation for considering a ν4 as the progenitor of the up-ward directed cascades observed by ANITA is to allevi-ate the need to explain the extreme fluxes of SM neu-trinos needed to overcome the opacity of the earth atEeV neutrino energies. If we consider the SM neutrinotransient case, tight spatial and temporal correlation ofSN2014dz [44] and the detection of event 15717147, sig-nificant at 2.7σ [5], present the interesting possibility thatnorthern hemisphere detectors may have simultaneouslyobserved EeV neutrino events. Adjusting our analysisto restore neutrino cross sections and opacities to theirSM values, we calculate that ANITA has a transient ac-ceptance of 0.15 cm2 for a 1 EeV SM neutrino arrivingfrom the direction of event 15717147. For comparison theSuper-Kamiokande (SK) detector has a transient accep-tance of 470 cm2 for a 1 EeV SM neutrino arriving fromabove the earth’s horizon. The latitude of SK, 36.2o N,and declination of SN2014dz, +38.0 [44], yield the resultthat SK had SN2014dz above its local horizon ∼ 70%of the time, giving a similar exposure efficiency to anySM neutrino flux from that supernova. We can roughlyestimate that if a transient flux of SM neutrinos is thesource of event 15717147, SK should have experiencedsome ∼ 2, 200 neutrino events in the EeV energy range

during the same burst. Estimating along similar lines forevent 3985267, SK may have observed ∼ 1 EeV neutrinoevents around the same time. SK was not running a UHEneutrino search at the time of these events, but a reviewof archival data would be illuminating.

The only other SM based proposal for the origin ofthe two upward directed cascades so far has been thatof transition radiation from a UHECR neutrino interact-ing within the ice below ANITA [45]. While this modelrequires no extension of SM physics it is simultaneouslyconstrained by the non-observation of UHE neutrinos inthe 20−30 EeV energy range in other detection channelsand experiments. This leads to a current prediction of∼ 2.9 × 10−3 transition radiation events for the ANITAflight time of 52.8 days, disfavoring two observed eventsin this particular model at P ' 4.2× 10−6.

Our scenario where ANITA’s two upward directedshowers are due to a ν4 progenitor is broadly consistentwith the current set of sterile neutrino oscillation hintsand constraints [12] and also with the non-observationsof transient neutrino bursts by northern hemisphere neu-trino detectors. One of the key features of this modelis the kinematic decoherence of astrophysical neutrinos,which collapses them into propagating mass eigenstatesprior to reaching earth. This allows ν4 to propagatethrough the bulk of earth without experiencing mattersuppression of their SM mixing angles [46] and allows usto neglect quantum kinetic effects [47]. There is a con-straint that the ν4 state cannot be so massive that it de-cays back to SM particles before reaching earth after itscreation. For this we require that an EeV neutrino havea decay length of at least 1 Gpc. For the case that ν4 is amassive singlet state the lifetime is dominated by decay

into 3 SM neutrinos, m4 ≤ 2 MeV ×(.01/ sin2 2θτ4

)1/6.

In conclusion, our calculations lead to a road mapto disentangle the mystery of ANITA’s upward directedcascade events. Because the transient ν4 acceptance ofANITA along the lines of sight of these two events isroughly equal to that of IceCube across the entire north-ern sky, additional transient sources of EeV energy ν4are likely to be detected by IceCube in the future. If thecascades are due to transient SM neutrino bursts, SKand other northern hemisphere neutrino detectors havea strong chance of observing correlated UHE neutrinoevents. If the upward directed cascades continue to bedetected by subsequent ANITA flights along similar tra-jectories with no concomitant detection in IceCube orSK, we can conclude they are likely an uncharacterizedbackground. We lastly note that much of the formalismemployed here can be repurposed for related New Physicsscenarios at ANITA, such as “boosted dark matter [48].”

The authors would like to thank Benjamin Jones fororiginating the idea that led to this work and AlexeiSmirnov and Andres Romero-Wolf for their helpful com-ments and feedback.

Page 5: ANITA - arXivANITA John F. Cherry1 and Ian M. Shoemaker1 1Department of Physics, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069, USA (Dated: 8-23-2018) The ANITA balloon experiment

5

∗ Electronic address: [email protected][1] K. Greisen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 748 (1966).[2] G. T. Zatsepin and V. A. Kuzmin, JETP Lett. 4, 78

(1966), [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.4,114(1966)].[3] V. S. Berezinsky and G. T. Zatsepin, Phys. Lett. 28B,

423 (1969).[4] P. W. Gorham, J. Nam, A. Romero-Wolf, S. Hoover,

P. Allison, O. Banerjee, J. J. Beatty, K. Belov, D. Z.Besson, W. R. Binns, et al., Physical Review Letters 117,071101 (2016), 1603.05218.

[5] P. W. Gorham, B. Rotter, P. Allison, O. Banerjee, L. Bat-ten, J. J. Beatty, K. Bechtol, K. Belov, D. Z. Besson,W. R. Binns, et al., ArXiv e-prints (2018), 1803.05088.

[6] A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (LSND), Phys. Rev. D64,112007 (2001), hep-ex/0104049.

[7] C. Giunti and M. Laveder, Phys. Rev. C83, 065504(2011), 1006.3244.

[8] G. Mention, M. Fechner, T. Lasserre, T. A. Mueller,D. Lhuillier, M. Cribier, and A. Letourneau, Phys. Rev.D83, 073006 (2011), 1101.2755.

[9] A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE), Phys. Rev.Lett. 110, 161801 (2013), 1207.4809.

[10] Y. Ko et al. (NEOS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 121802(2017), 1610.05134.

[11] I. Alekseev et al., JINST 11, P11011 (2016), 1606.02896.[12] MiniBooNE Collaboration, A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo, B. C.

Brown, L. Bugel, G. Cheng, J. M. Conrad, R. L. Cooper,R. Dharmapalan, A. Diaz, Z. Djurcic, et al., ArXiv e-prints (2018), 1805.12028.

[13] G. H. Collin, C. A. Arguelles, J. M. Conrad, and M. H.Shaevitz, Physical Review Letters 117, 221801 (2016),1607.00011.

[14] B. Feldstein, A. Kusenko, S. Matsumoto, and T. T.Yanagida, Phys. Rev. D 88, 015004 (2013), 1303.7320.

[15] A. Esmaili and P. Dario Serpico, JCAP 11, 054 (2013),1308.1105.

[16] Y. Ema, R. Jinno, and T. Moroi, Physics Letters B 733,120 (2014), 1312.3501.

[17] P. Ko and Y. Tang, Physics Letters B 751, 81 (2015).[18] J. F. Cherry, A. Friedland, and I. M. Shoemaker (2014),

1411.1071.[19] J. F. Cherry, A. Friedland, and I. M. Shoemaker, ArXiv

e-prints (2016), 1605.06506.[20] K. S. Babu and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Lett. B275, 112

(1992).[21] S. Hannestad, R. S. Hansen, and T. Tram, Phys. Rev.

Lett. 112, 031802 (2014), 1310.5926.[22] B. Dasgupta and J. Kopp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 031803

(2014), 1310.6337.[23] T. Bringmann, J. Hasenkamp, and J. Kersten, JCAP

1407, 042 (2014), 1312.4947.[24] M. Archidiacono, S. Hannestad, R. S. Hansen, and

T. Tram (2014), 1404.5915, URL http://arxiv.org/

abs/1404.5915.

[25] N. Saviano, O. Pisanti, G. Mangano, and A. Mirizzi,Phys. Rev. D90, 113009 (2014), 1409.1680.

[26] A. Mirizzi, G. Mangano, O. Pisanti, and N. Saviano,Phys. Rev. D91, 025019 (2015), 1410.1385.

[27] X. Chu, B. Dasgupta, and J. Kopp, JCAP 1510, 011(2015), 1505.02795.

[28] M. Archidiacono, S. Gariazzo, C. Giunti, S. Hannestad,

R. Hansen, M. Laveder, and T. Tram, JCAP 1608, 067(2016), 1606.07673.

[29] F. Forastieri, M. Lattanzi, G. Mangano, A. Mirizzi,P. Natoli, and N. Saviano, JCAP 1707, 038 (2017),1704.00626.

[30] Y. S. Jeong, S. Palomares-Ruiz, M. H. Reno, and I. Sarce-vic, JCAP 1806, 019 (2018), 1803.04541.

[31] J. M. Berryman, V. Brdar, and P. Huber (2018),1803.08506.

[32] X. Chu, B. Dasgupta, M. Dentler, J. Kopp, and N. Sa-viano (2018), 1806.10629.

[33] P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck) (2015), 1502.01589.[34] J. Alvarez-Muniz, W. R. Carvalho, Jr, K. Payet,

A. Romero-Wolf, H. Schoorlemmer, and E. Zas, ArXive-prints (2017), 1707.00334.

[35] F. Halzen and D. Saltzberg, Physical Review Letters 81,4305 (1998), hep-ph/9804354.

[36] E. Bugaev, T. Montaruli, Y. Shlepin, and I. Sokalski,Astroparticle Physics 21, 491 (2004), hep-ph/0312295.

[37] O. B. Bigas, O. Deligny, K. Payet, and V. van Elewyck,Phys. Rev. D 78, 063002 (2008), 0806.2126.

[38] H. Schoorlemmer, K. Belov, A. Romero-Wolf, D. Garcıa-Fernandez, V. Bugaev, S. A. Wissel, P. Allison,J. Alvarez-Muniz, S. W. Barwick, J. J. Beatty, et al.,Astroparticle Physics 77, 32 (2016), 1506.05396.

[39] A. Romero-Wolf, A., 35th Internat. Cosmix Ray Conf.,Vol 301, (2017).

[40] A. Dziewonsku and D. Anderson, Physics of the earthand planetary interiors 25, 297 (1981).

[41] A. Connolly, R. S. Thorne, and D. Waters, Phys. Rev. D83, 113009 (2011), 1102.0691.

[42] A. Aab, P. Abreu, M. Aglietta, E. J. Ahn, I. Al Samarai,I. F. M. Albuquerque, I. Allekotte, P. Allison, A. Almela,J. Alvarez Castillo, et al., Phys. Rev. D 91, 092008(2015), 1504.05397.

[43] IceCube Collaboration, M. G. Aartsen, M. Ackermann,J. Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, I. A.Samarai, D. Altmann, K. Andeen, et al., ArXiv e-prints(2017), 1710.01191.

[44] URL https://wis-tns.weizmann.ac.il/object/

2014dz.[45] P. Motloch, J. Alvarez-Muniz, P. Privitera, and E. Zas,

Phys. Rev. D 95, 043004 (2017), 1606.07059.[46] Y. Farzan and A. Y. Smirnov, Nuclear Physics B 805,

356 (2008), 0803.0495.[47] G.-y. Huang, ArXiv e-prints (2018), 1804.05362.[48] K. Agashe, Y. Cui, L. Necib, and J. Thaler, JCAP 1410,

062 (2014), 1405.7370.