Angelica de Oliveira-Costa
description
Transcript of Angelica de Oliveira-Costa
![Page 1: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Angelica de Oliveira-CostaUniversity of Pennsylvania
The Cosmic Microwave Background:
New Challenges.
XI Advanced School of Astrophysics Campos do Jordao, September
2002
![Page 2: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Importance of CMB Polarization:
1. Polarization measurements can substantially improve accuracy with which parameters are measured by breaking the degeneracy between certain parameter combinations.2. It also offers an independent test of the basic assumptions that underly the standard cosmological model.
![Page 3: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Where does CMB Polarization comes from (Hu & White 1997)?
CMB polarization is induced via Thomson scattering, either at decoupling or during a later epoch of reonization.
The level of polarization induced is linked to the local quadrupole anisotropy of radiation incident on the scattering eletrons. The level of polarization is expected to be 1%-10% of the amplitude of the temperature anisotropies.
Under coordinate transformations, the Q and U maps transform into a “vector” field on the celestial sphere described by the quantities E and B.E and B can correlate with each other, and with the temperature T. By parity, <EB> and <TB> are zero, <TE> has the largest signal, <EE> is smaller, and <BB> should be zero (except for the cases of gravity-waves present in the last scattering or the existence of polarized foregrounds).
Important things to know (Kamionkowski et al. 1997,
Zaldarriaga 1998):
TT TE TB
TE EE EBTB EB BB
![Page 4: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
![Page 5: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
![Page 6: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM (d = d h2)
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
![Page 7: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos (fn =HDM/T)
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
![Page 8: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
![Page 9: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
![Page 10: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
![Page 11: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
![Page 12: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
![Page 13: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Matter Buget
1. g = Photons
2. b = Baryons (H,He,…)
3. d = CDM
4. fu = Neutrinos
5. L = Lambda (Dark Energy)
6. k = Curvature
Input Fluctuations
7. As = Scalar Normalization
8. At = Tensor Normalization
9. ns = Scalar Tilt
10. nt = Tensor Tilt
Gastrophysics
11. = Reonization Optical Depth
From Combinations of Parameters
12. h = Hubble Constant
Others
Foregrounds, Topology, Defects, etc.
Our Cosmological Model: Polarization Movies:
www.hep.upenn.edu/~angelica/polarization.html
![Page 14: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Princeton IQU Experiment (PIQUE):
Ground based experiment (roof of Jadwin Hall).FWHM = 0.235o (100<l<600).Operates at 90 (and 40) GHz.Scans a ring of radius 1o around the NCP (144 pixels).
Hedman et al. (2001)
Sensitivity ~ 3KHEMT correlation receiver.
Team:
M. Hedman
D. BarkatsJ. Gundersen
S. StaggsB. Winstein
A. de Oliveira-CostaM. TegmarkM. Zaldarriaga
Part of analysis effort:
Expected foregrounds < 0.5K.
![Page 15: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
PIQUE Analysis:
Headman et al. (2001):TE <14K 211 (+294,-146)TB <13K 212 (+229,-135)TE(TB=0) <10K
de Oliveira-Costa et al (2002):TTE <17K
TTB <20K
We compute 5 power spectra T,E,B,TE & TB with a QE method, and later complement it with the Likelihood analysis.
TSK =50K
Netterfield et al. (1997):
TEB ???
50 bands w/ dl=20 till l=1000
To do better we need reduce PIQUE pixel noise.
![Page 16: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Polarization Observations of the Large Angular Regions (POLAR):
Ground based experiment (Madison, WI).FWHM=7o (2<l<20).Operates at 30 GHzScans at fixed =43o (300 pixels).
O’Dell (2002)
Keating et al. (2001)
Expected sensitivity ~ 1-5K.HEMT correlation receiver.
Team:B. KeatingC. O’Dell
P. Timbie
A. PolnarevJ. Steinberger
Part of analysis effort:A. de Oliveira-
CostaM. Tegmark
![Page 17: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
POLAR Results:
O’Dell, Ph.D Thesis (2002)
Keating et al. (2001):
TE <10K
TB <10K
TE(TB=0) < 8K
de Oliveira-Costa et al (2002):
TTE <13K
TTB <11K
TDMR =20K
Smoot et al. (1992):
TEB < 4K
3 bands w/ dl=10 till l=30
(Normalized Likelihood Contours)
(Band power estimates - same results when average the bands)
![Page 18: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
“Leakage”: Tegmark & de Oliveira-Costa et al. (2001).
1. E and B are symmetric:
2. Leakage drops with l (E/B
3. Map-shape is important:
4. Sensitivity is negligible
variance is dominant, this
There are equal leakage from
E to B and vise-versa.
separation works well for
l>>dl).
The narrowest dimension of
the map is the limiting factor.
compared with sky coverage:In a situation where sample
tends to make windowns
slightly lobsided.
B2002, l=20: B2002, l=70:
Circle, l=70:
B2002, l=20 (disentangle):
5. There is no leakage between T & TE and E & TE.
6. There is no leakage between TE & TB, E & EB and B & EB: de Oliveira-Costa et al. (2002). 7. Leakage between E & B can be completed removed: Bunn et al. (2002).
![Page 19: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Balloon Observations Of Millimetric Extragalactic Radiation
ANd Geophysics (BOOMERanG):
Ballon experiment (two 10 day flight).Operates between 150 to 450 GHz.
FWHM=10’ (50<l<1000).
Bolometers. Sensitivity ~ 7K (“small regions”) and ~22K otherwise.
2nd flight: 80 & 800(o)2.
de Bernardis et al. (2000)
1st flight: 80 & 800(o)2.
Team:UCSB: J. Ruhl, K. Coble, T. Montroy, E. TorbetCaltech: A. Lange, B. Crill, V. Hristov, B. Jones, K. Ganga, P. MansonJPL: J. BockU.Mass: P. MauskopfU.Penn: A. de Oliveira-Costa, M. TegmarkU.Toronto: B. NetterfieldU.La Sapienza: P. de Bernardis, S. Masi, F. Piacentini, F. Scaramuzzi, N. VittorioIROE: A. BoscareliQueen Mary: P. Ade
![Page 20: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Microwave Anisotropy Probe (MAP):
Frequencies(GHz): 22 30 40 60 90
FWHM(): 0.93 0.68 0.53 0.35 0.23
Sensitivity: ~35K (all channels & 0.3 x 0.3 pixels)Detector: Differential Radiometer (with polarization)
More info at: http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov
Data release: Jan 2003! Data from 1st full sky scan
![Page 21: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Other CMB Polarization Experiments:
Experiment FWHM n(GHz) Receiver Sensitivity Area Site
Polatron 2.5’ 100 Bolometer 11K 5313(’)2 OVRO
†RoPE 2o 9 HEMT 5K 560(o)2 LBNL Compass 15’ 30,40&90 HEMT 8K U.Wisc.
MAP 13-41’ 30,40,60&90 HEMT 19K All sky Space L2
Planck-LFI 14’&10’ 70&100 HEMT 6K All sky Space L2
Planck-HFI 8’&5’ 143&217 Bolometer 6K All sky Space L2SPOrt 7o 22,32,60&90 HEMT 80% sky Space Station
(300<l<2000)
(2<l<50)
(l<650)
(l<600)
(l<1500)
(2<l<20)
BOOMERanG 10’ 150,250&450 Bolometer 7K,22K 80-800(o)2 SP (50<l<1000)
Maxipol 10’ 140&420 Bolometer 1.4K NM
DASI 10-15’ 30 HEMT 10(o)2 SP(100<l<900)
CBI 3’-6o 30 Interferometer 3 of 100(o)2 Atacama (2<l<2000)
CapMap 3’ 30,90 HEMT 0.2K 3(o)2 Princeton (300<l<2000)
![Page 22: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Small Scale CMB Experiments:
We propose a Center for High Resolution CMB studies (CfHRC). This center will develop a Millimeter Bolometer Camera (MBC) which will be implemented in the Atacama Cosmology Teslescopy (ACT).
Operates at frequencies 145, 225 & 265 GHz.Ground based experiment at Atacama desert, Chile.
Sensitivity/pixel ~ 2, 8 & 16K (64 nights of quality data).
FWHM=1.7, 1.1 & 0.93’.Scans only in azimuth with the ability to cross-link elevations.
Team:
Haverford: S. Boughn, B. Partridge
U.Penn: A. de Oliveira-Costa, M. Devlin, B. Jain, M. Tegmark
Princeton: N. Jarosik, R. Lupton, L. Page, U. Seljak, D. Spergel, S. Staggs, D. Wilkinson
Rutgers: A. Kosowsky
U.Toronto: B. Netterfield
NASA/GSFC: H. Moseley
NIST: K. Irwin
![Page 23: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
CfHRC Goals:
Measure the primary anisotropy beyond the MAP & Planck resolution limits.
Measure the amplitude of the CMB gravitational lensing, and therefore probe the mass power spectrum at 1Mpc scales at z~1-2.
Find galaxy clusters at z<1 through SZ effect.
Detect signature of reonization at z~10 through Vishniac effect.
Find all extragalactic mm-wave point sources in 200(o)2 to a sensitivity of 1mJy.
![Page 24: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Galactic Microwave Emission:
Objectives
1. Accurate modeling and subtraction of Galactic foreground contamination in order to correct measure the CMB power spectrum.
2. Unique opportunity to understand the Galactic emission processes between 10 to 103 GHz.
Smoot et al. (1992)
![Page 25: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Galactic Microwave Emission:
Objectives
1. Accurate modeling and subtraction of Galactic foreground contamination in order to correct measure the CMB power spectrum.
2. Unique opportunity to understand the Galactic emission processes between 10 to 103 GHz.
Smoot et al. (1992)
![Page 26: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Synchrotron Emission:
![Page 28: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Dust Emission:
![Page 29: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Free-Free Emission:
Reynolds et al. (2001)
![Page 30: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
COBE/DMR
At 31GHz we expect DIRBE traces free-free.
Smoot et al. (1992)
![Page 31: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Saskatoon
OVRO result (Leitch et al. 1997) is much higher than expected for a free-free component.
![Page 32: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
19 GHz
Spinning dust grains predicts a turn-over at lower frequencies (Draine & Lazarian 1998).
![Page 33: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
QMAP
![Page 34: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Tenerife
Smoking gun: evidence for a turn-over and WHAM correlations only at b<15o.
Jones (1999)
![Page 35: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Galactic Microwave Emission:
Objectives
1. Accurate modeling and subtraction of Galactic foreground contamination in order to correct measure the CMB power spectrum.
2. Unique opportunity to understand the Galactic emission processes between 10 to 103 GHz.
Smoot et al. (1992)
![Page 36: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Galactic Microwave Emission:
Objectives
1. Accurate modeling and subtraction of Galactic foreground contamination in order to correct measure the CMB power spectrum.
2. Unique opportunity to understand the Galactic emission processes between 10 to 103 GHz.
Smoot et al. (1992)
![Page 37: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
QMAP Foregrounds:
![Page 38: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
QMAP Power Spectrum:
![Page 39: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Polarized Foregrounds:
Residual foregrounds after cleaning 5 MAP channels:
![Page 40: Angelica de Oliveira-Costa](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062304/56813f50550346895daa0afc/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Conclusions:
CMB Polarization is likely to be a goldmine of cosmological information, allowing improved measurements of many cosmological parameters and numerous important cross-checks and tests of the underlying theory.
CMB Small Angular Scale maps enables new fundamental cosmological tests.
Our ability to measure cosmological parameters using the CMB will only be as good as our understanding of the microwave foregrounds.