To kuin 13a frehe 1,4311U Aile al, ::-.1;24 rec,erae 4106 Dallas field ()flies *ilea t% Lee Barvey Osuali

In this apeeal i include the de facto denial of t)ese unidentifiabl,

thhold wader worksheet notations e "previoutly processed° for the reasons eteted

liar, that thee' caeuot inatified in PIM records ,erevided and that they are

Withheld, FBI records I have checked, coni-ierY to Ir. is reight's repreeeeeip.

tie= that I have been elven those inIticatoe as previously procesred.

TLie "Oswald" Me i incledes no Sae an erovided. I. am confident there are Z;ebe

that are withheld./(Sections of inventeries and teansletione are not indicated a Subs.

I ther9r0r. sp,:elki the dental of ai subs. The Karina Ceveld file recaias withheld although trensIstiona of her corren-

pondenee are included in the 10461 recorde, 1 re nse my appeal of the denial of the

"a s1.146 eewala Vile with core:level:ion that It i not included Mn the Lee Omweld fie.

I also appeal the noedlese withholding, atteibutee to (b)(1)(.) ea *le greund of

waiver In Wition to earlier grousde. 'rem recollection the 10441 reeords dieclose

hysieal, telopleoree and beg euvraillanoes and indicate others. Records resulting from

these and ether eurvell.eAnces are ilso

(When We, OVA MI-UM 03'44tt Win ereetaee you Pith cteFdt re reeorde levant

to the appeal, iJeluding refereecee to attaohmente tha not etache and not

referred to on the ,0171,:e11_,,tat and to surveilLances.)

Aiseeg etill withheld records are nOw L. Harvey °weld tax records. :dome in

feet ere A0,1; wIthheld. tharefor;, regard tlui dieelosere of tue reeerds as a

waiver ma ask for those that remain eithhhld. The privacy question is frivoloae with

Oswald's death and the disclosure of oth;r tax records in the JEK case, besides those

of oswalds diecloaed. that is not frivolousi the p000itiIity that thee. tax

r:-torte refloat amaaaountel Oswald tecone, az from iag aa inforTeut. 'earticularly

If these V400144 de not reflect such igtOOme aaci do not indicate that Donald wae en

informant do I believe & national :expose is served by dieelozare.The.. Anlveres ie true, too.

There are references to a ''eecurity investieetion' and to 4eocurite reverts that

arc eot ideatifiably included if inoledee in elle way in reeerds provide l. So I az,:,,oal

the 4enei1 of recorde r4.1ating to the security inveatiention and reports.

Other relevant files are referred to and not provided, 1 mode notes of three in

105 files not provided. I appeal the denial of alt racer**, files, known to the Fa.

Because secugh tint! he ae peseee for referrele to hove be provided I regard not previding them now at a de facto denial and I appeal it. The worksheets are dated

in June. Other records show that the processing began earlier. This walla that by

Almost the records could have been provide e and I believe should have been. In SOW

or canez; years have sassed without compltanoe. Almost two years with we King motion recordo, 4'hi3 is long in exCees of clsiwed backlogs. It was the ixactise of agencies Without any claimed backlog./ am not at all sure that all King referrals have been provided or accounted for. 4iven the as of some of my requests, now more than idecele old, my age, the state of Ay health and the tie already elapsed believe axosdited processing o al'. rrrals 10 not din uLressonahle exieotatious

n revi,wing these records toil -.seas notes of soma, perhaps net all, sgenciee to which referrals are noted on tho worAshasts. have heard nothing from any of these:

sorry 41,6; oi.ia /WI; ilS6141A6pecret ervioe UAis Air iorcs; Customs Service) Aortal Service.

:or your further information, th, tim:: available for processing of the referrals is up to foue zonths. have records of th;:, Lualan.6 of 20 Sii=of the rewords in this file on 5/147,5 by 186/213.,

nitaboli files are not limited to 1095setale withheld filea are known to the 7b1. regard the sithboldingp 3,3 deliberats. Aa one ilaustrstioa, *vial 77 is amid to be

in Sub ti. 1 118n provided tio lisot*ans identified as frs Sub 1A. Obriossly this was known to those wno processed the records. The regards are my source.

Another illmAration of deliberate withholding is serial'0666. ft is recorded as destroyed but with a oopy is 44-19, .10 2927. This was 4thhF4d, eet provided. Another similar illustration is Se ial 2745 and perhaps 3152 and 3432. 4 notes are nuclear on the last two.

Mose Oswald records contain no relerenoe to auy of my extensive writtng on him that mould be relevkint in the 1C0 file. I barleys terser records are filed elssAhere if not withheld in this file and I f.,pseal their denial. In this conn,vtion I remind you Alepecial Dallas files on relevant books, still not provided, also appealed.

The re0oras relating to his wilting ak .4ostY a note s subsesuont destruction of it sun 01 what i5 calied aa investigation oi tUr, natter remain w -2 h]4. JiLilarlY, some records of outside contacts with SAs and former Ms on this and air subjects rain withheld. The Dallas papers reported their contacts not all of :hich sre reprosehted in too records provided. i know of others. This also is true of Uawald's New ,-)rlsana operatituls, is4lusing literature distribution an arrest,

No records relating to the killing of Oswald are provided. If 1040 of them are included in the i.tioy file knot yet provided) this would not be consistent with other filing practises. sone of the relevant medical records and of the autopsy are orovided. ihere

s seandelous prior withholdings tnst can e4' tn these wi.thholdings. One is

unreported and known injury to Oswald. Another is reported earlier surgery not re-fleeted in the autopsy records in thee Archives.

ho records of Oswald's reported p icketing or literature distributions in Dallas

asd virtually none of , olitica1 inquiry kno4n to have been 112,L .frovided. acne of the notes made by any of the S ernriginal statements of ,.citneates

are proviaed.

)(or of the many photo ra is referred to. There we no rooiads' of t invastigetion of au Uswsld Aezican 'en and

in Dallas at the same time. These are referred to In Ur, 89-43 file, whe ttey alas are sot in what was provided. This is true of other investigatory voids, such as of the examination of n tape or tapes and photeg aphs raahed up from k.exieo (ity then Legat SA Eldon audd. This ext-nds to the records of false reportings of Os-wald at the Cuban embassy in kexico city and the allegations of persons like Alvtreds Ugarte, but not him alone.

There are no records of any inve tion. to identify the pereon incorrectly rofer7ed to as Oevald in the ;lexica City there La any busts for the allegations of the hou.-o agsawins dolamittee of 7/W7e in its releases of pictur643 ran= sketches than of this there also are no mcords provided. In this connection there 1:ere earlier allegations attributed to one Antonio Vocinna and referring to seetings with an Oswald and Aaurice(Morris) bisho in Dallas. No records are provided. even though relevant refol-cnooa crist in the 89-43 files.

I recall no records rely tin to the providing of these and y other relevant records to a number of Congressional comsittees of both Reuses. Vhile I am a: ere of the pow Ability that the FBW withheld Dallas Yield Ofiice riles I e not maeurdAg thic ones. I do as:Imms that ties m was compliance with C;iongreafdallta requente. Yet the records provided include none of these.

bile I believe my recollection io depeudah14, concentration and cootinaity of work on these records was interfered with 1 a large amount of Mow and regular interw-raptions by roper-tern over the leaking of VIZ resords relating to the `'in t; mid the alf assassinations. If my recollection is incorrect those who processed these records should be able to cite records indioatinc that my recollection is flawed, if it is.

The most recent of these leaks, all keyed tai self-preservation au1 similar efforte by th• 1-1obee uosausins committte, relates to en interpretation of a tape of Dallas police broadcasts at the time of the Jrx assassination. This is not a new story. Several articles saying exactly the same thing were published quite some time aeo by Porn Jones of Midlothian, which is near Dallas, in his small newsletter. There has been no refer nee to ht, fteslet*av or these allegations of a fourth shot recordod on tape. There thus kire no reflections of :a-sy 2BI inquiry iL,to tnje or this alleged analysis of it. However, the F21 did have the relevant tapes and records. (Scene recording vas on disc.) It provided anincomplate transcript for the Warren CONsiSsiOn• I have not seen any tranziorkot in them, Dallaz records provided to date. if there are any such

Yla inquiries into this published interpretation of the tape, which would be a direct

refulttion of the nI's solution to the crime, I have oeen no reeord. no indication in.

these 11441a* esoordae (There are separate filee relating to Penn ''ones. not proviaed.)

I believe that egy and all such records, however stored or deecribed, shpuld have

provided. I cannot imagine that there are none or that the Lab was not consulted

such matters. With these newer allegations and this void in the FBI records I a for a dub of all police broadcasts tapes or other recordings, including county,

state and. federal. If there are FM records not provided, I ask for expedited processing

of thee because of the interest stirred up by the leaks, which do provide a currant

and serious national interest. Dabbing on cassettes will be adequate. Another such tape surfaced in early 1964. I recell ao reoorde relating to this

Le either Dallas file. Such records, as you now know, can be located rapidly from the

levee index existence of which was withheld allemngeviiiii)index itself. I believe the

first fereapeditotd processing is hers also relevant.* recolleollee is that the 1964

tapemssOmed wt to be authentic. But the tepee the Mt has should be authentic.)

The subject is topical and has attracted wide attention. Particulark, if the allegations

are not true de I believe the information should be made available promptly.

There are recordings of statements by witnesses that also have not been provided

and in fact are not referred to in the records provided. Ie prior appoale I have

referred to this in connection with withholdings relating Dallas policeman Jim

Chaney. If I did not mention that I have the phoaograph record including officer

haney's voice prepared by eordou Maelendou's radio station. KLIF, I do. If not prior to the distribution of thie record then afterward tbere ahoula have been aume

relevant FBI records. I believe they also are withheld and apeeal this eithholaing. (There is no reference to them in the Oswald file and there le Illithat I can expect

from the auhe filo, which has not yet been proVidede)