Analytical and computational paradigms for plasma turbulence-II A Thyagaraja UKAEA/EURATOM Fusion...
-
Upload
phebe-francis -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Analytical and computational paradigms for plasma turbulence-II A Thyagaraja UKAEA/EURATOM Fusion...
Analytical and computational paradigms for plasma turbulence-II
A Thyagaraja
UKAEA/EURATOM Fusion Association
Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, UK
Trieste Plasma School, October, 2003
Acknowledgements
• Peter Knight,Terry Martin, Jack Connor, Chris Lashmore-Davies (Culham)
• Marco de Baar, Erik Min, Hugo de Blank, Dick Hogeweij, Niek Lopes Cardozo (FOM)
• Xavier Garbet, Paola Mantica, Luca Garzotti (EFDA/JET)• Nuno Loureiro (Imperial College)• Michele Romanelli (Frascati)• Dan McCarthy (USEL)• EPSRC (UK)/EURATOM
Synopsis
• What is plasma turbulence?
• What are the key problems to be addressed?
• Main ideas of the approach.
• Typical results: long-time evolution and modulated ECH in RTP as examples
• Conclusions
What is plasma turbulence?• In principle, a plasma can be maintained (driven) by sources against
collisional (dissipative) losses.
• Resulting current/pressure profiles are strongly unstable.
• Instability spontaneously breaks symmetry in space & time.
• Growing modes nonlinearly saturate, leading to turbulent fluxes, spectral cascades and anomalous transport.
• Equilibrium and turbulence cross-talk on a range of scales, especially in the mesoscales.
Why is turbulence important?
• Usually, though not invariably, turbulent losses are more severe than neoclassical.
• Magnetic shear (q’) and E x B flow shear seem to play key roles in formation and dynamics of high gradient regions called Transport Barriers (ETB’s or ITB’s) identified in experiments.
• Understanding and control crucial to power plant issues: economics, divertor loading, ash removal etc.
• Difficult unsolved problem. Much recent progress through complementary approaches, close theory/expt interaction.
Characteristics of tokamak turbulence
• “Universal”, electromagnetic (dn/n and dj/j comparable!), between system size and ion gyro radius; between confinement (s) and Alfvén (ns) times:
• Plasma is “self-organising”, like planetary atmospheres (Rossby waves=Drift waves).
• Transport barriers connected with sheared flows, rational q’s, inverse cascades/modulational instabilities (Hasegawa).
• Analogous to El Nino, circumpolar vortex, “shear sheltering” (J.C.R Hunt et al).
))(/( kLv snth
Key Concepts: q and zonal flow
• “Mode rational surface” when m=nq; long wave length MHD modes may occur. “Magnetic shear” dq/dr, an important stability parameter;dynamo effects.
• Plasma knows “number theory”, resonances analogous to Saturn’s rings occur -KAM theory
• Radial electric field associated with sheared zonal flow (from ExB drifts); influences stability: Taylor flow analogy!
• Inverse and direct cascades determine turbulent saturation and transport.
Challenges for Theory
• Explain observations, scalings, thresholds.
• Predict phenomena (ITB’s, transitions, sawteeth, ELM’s, impurity behaviour, pinches..)
• Calculate with adequate accuracy, faster than experiment, consistent with both qualitative and quantitative facts.
• Suggest new diagnostics, improved performance, better engineering design.
Challenges for Experiments
• Comprehensive, time-space resolved diagnostics of T, n, q, E, Z needed.
• Measurements of turbulent spectra (high & low k).
• Transients: pellets, modulated heating.
• Adequate inter and intra machine comparisons.
• Only starting to be met in JET, ASDEX, TORE-Supra, DIIID, MAST, NSTX, JT-60U, TEXTOR, FTU..
“Arithmetizing” tokamak turbulence:CUTIE
• Global, electromagnetic ( ), two-fluid (electrons/ions) code.Co-evolves turbulence and equilibrium-”self-consistent” transport.
• “Minimalist” approach to tokamak turbulence: evolve Conservation Laws and Maxwell’s equations for 7-fields, 3-d, pseudo spectral+radial finite-differencing, semi-implicit predictor-corrector, fully nonlinear.
• Periodic cylinder model, but field-line curvature treated; describes mesoscale, fluid-like instabilities, but no kinetics or trapped particles (but includes neoclassics).
• Question: What, if anything, do the solutions of such a model tell us about experiments? (Long-time evolution, q, zonal flows,..)
j
dj
n
dn
).( vnt
n
cn
t
nmi
Bj
Pvvv
)].()(
[
Rve
ee
enc
p
BE
Equations of motion (1)
S “Continuity”
“Total momentum”
“Generalised Ohm’s Law”
PTnTtTn
PTnTtTn
iiiiiii
eeeeeee
qv.v
qv.v
..][2
3
..][2
3
ABzA
Bj
AE
;4
1
ctc
Equations of motion (2)
“Energy”
“Pre-Maxwell”
Sfff
rrrt
10
turb
f
coll
ff
vExB
r
turb
ff
The mean equations have a generic structure: turbulentand collisional fluxes add to give total flux. Radial/temporal “corrugations” allowed!
RTP tokamak: well-diagnosed, revealing subtle features of transport, excellent testing ground
Te(0)
A
A’
A”B
CD E
ECH power deposition radius (Rho/a)
Sawtooth like oscillations
0.5
Hollow Te
Step-like changesin Te(0) “plateaux”whenever deposition radiuscrosses “rational” surfaces!
What is the physics?
• RTP has well-defined phenomenology: “q-comb model” to fit data (thermal diffusivity lowered at rational q surfaces). Explanation?
• Why do barriers have a preference to form near simple rationals?
• What is the role of zonal flows in RTP?
• What is the cause of the outward advection producing off-axis Te maxima?
• What drives off-axis MHD?
CUTIE/RTP scenarios
• Instability -linear growth-nonlinear saturation- “corrugated profiles”
• The corrugations feed-back on the turbulence: nonlinear co-evolution of turbulence and profiles essential.
• Calculations start from an (arbitrary) Ohmic initial condition, after which the off-axis Electron Cyclotron Heating (ECH) is switched on.
• “Switch-off”, modulated ECH (MECH), and pellets have also been studied
Barriers and q
• CUTIE produces barriers near the simple rationals in q.(only global codes can do this!)
• Mechanism: due to heating, a mode forms. Gives rise to turbulent fluxes which locally steepen pressure gradient resulting in, zonal flows and dynamo effects which tend to reduce turbulence and flatten q.
• Two barrier loops operate in CUTIE! The loops interact in synergy.
Two barrier loops in CUTIEAsymmetric fluxes near mode rational surface
Pressure gradient
Zonal flows modify turbulence-back reacts
Turbulent dynamo, currents
q, dq/dr, j, dj/dr
Driving termsof turbulence
Off-axis ECH
• Ip=80kA, B=2.24T, qa=5.25
• neav ~ 2.7e19 m-3
• PECH 350 kW, P approximately 100 kW
• PECH deposited at r/a = 0.55
• We present the transition from monotonic (qmin ~ 1) to reversed shear (qo>3) and the associated changes in the profiles
Central safety factor and temperature evolution: off-axis ECH (350 kW) in RTP switch-on simulation; black-central, green-heating radius.
Outbound heat flow and ears
• Off-axis ECH-power enhances the fluctuation level within the deposition radius.
• The interplay of the EM-and ES-component of these fluctuations gives rise to an outward heat-flow.
• This flow is sufficient for supporting pronounced off-axis Te maxima in CUTIE.
• The ears are quite comparable to the experimental observations.
Modulated ECH in RTP (Mantica et al): CUTIE has simulated transients in many machines. Present results for Case A’, high duty cycle simulation vs expt.
MECH in RTP (Mantica et al): CUTIE has simulated transients in many machines. Present results for Case A’, low duty cycle (simulation- note differences from hdc.)
MECH in RTP (Mantica et al): simulated harmonics (keV)and phases: I harmonic, red, II, green, III, blue. Symbols-expt., lines-simulation (high duty cycle)
MECH in RTP (Mantica et al): simulated harmonics (keV)and phases: I harmonic, red, II, green, III, blue. symbols-expt., lines-simulation. (low duty cycle)
“Ear” choppers (MHD events)
• CUTIE produces MHD events like experiments.
• CUTIE shows that these events are both radially and poloidally localised, tending to flatten off-axis maxima (“ears”).
• Normally they show modest amplitudes with respect to the experiment.
• Transport involves “avalanching” and “bursts”; intermittency in certain locations.
• Qualitative features agree with experiment.
Zonal Flows
• Poloidal E x B flows, driven by turbulent Reynolds stresses: “Benjamin-Feir” type of modulational instability, “inverse cascade” recently explained in Generalized Charney Hasegawa Mima Equation.
• Highly sheared transverse flows “phase mix” and lead to a “direct cascade” in the turbulent fluctuations.
• Enhances diffusive damping and stabilizes turbulence linearly and nonlinearly.
• • Confines turbulence to low shear zones.
Discussion
• Some other results from CUTIE not presented here:
• “Ohmic bifurcations” (cf. Marco de Baar, et al. RTP)
• Cold pulses and pellet experiments in particle transport (cf. Mantica, Garbet, Garzotti-JET, Romanelli-FTU,Min et al RTP)
• Minimalist model can be used globally to get a synoptic description of a range of dynamic phenomena involving turbulence and transport.
• Trapped particles, kinetic (finer-scale) dynamics and full geometrical atomic physics effects remain future challenges!
Conclusions
• “Minimalist CUTIE model” reproduces qualitatively many RTP phenomena:
1) Barriers near rational q surfaces.
2) Off-axis maxima and outward heat convection (“ears”)
3) n,Te reflecting episodic q evolution (switch-on/off studies).
4) Zonal flow plays a role outside the ECH power deposition radius.
6) MHD modes (“ear choppers”); MECH (and pellet) behaviour.
• CUTIE/CENTORI applied to JET, MAST, FTU, ASDEX, TEXTOR.
• Approach complementary to gyrokinetics: more suited to long-term evolutionary features and global phenomena.