Marketing - Rural Marketing - Promotion of Brand in Rural Market of India1
Analysis of Rural Telecommunication In India1... · manufacturers like Ericsson, Nokia ......
Transcript of Analysis of Rural Telecommunication In India1... · manufacturers like Ericsson, Nokia ......
Analysis of Rural
Telecommunication In
India
Project Guide: Prof Rekha Jain
Submitted By: Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 2
Table of Content Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 3
End of Monopoly ..................................................................................................................................... 4
Telecom Industry Surges Ahead ............................................................................................................... 4
Myriads of Government Bodies ............................................................................................................... 6
Effective Measure of Rural ICT ................................................................................................................. 7
Obstacles in Achieving ICT Targets ........................................................................................................... 9
Poor Infrastructure .............................................................................................................................. 9
Unviable Economics ........................................................................................................................... 13
Lack of Appropriate Content .............................................................................................................. 14
Unfriendly Local Government Rules ................................................................................................... 15
Social Norms...................................................................................................................................... 15
Lack of Innovation in Technology Development ................................................................................. 15
Lack of infrastructure sharing ............................................................................................................ 16
Regulatory Issues ............................................................................................................................... 17
Overcoming the Hurdles ........................................................................................................................ 19
Policy and Administration Changes in USOF ....................................................................................... 19
Backhaul ............................................................................................................................................ 21
Collaboration with Local Governments .............................................................................................. 22
Develop Supplementary Industries .................................................................................................... 23
Technology Innovation ...................................................................................................................... 23
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 26
Appendix 1: Department of Telecommunication Objectives .................................................................. 28
Appendix 2: TRAI Goals and objectives .................................................................................................. 29
References ............................................................................................................................................ 30
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 3
Overview In an ever-increasing information intensive global economy, governments around the world are realizing
that the provision of adequate telecommunication services is absolutely vital to survival. Access to
modern telecommunication services is necessary for the development of international trade as well as
to national, regional, social and economic development. A country without an adequate
telecommunications infrastructure faces a magnitude of problems that will impede the growth of any
information based economic activity. This figure is referred to as teledensity (the number of phone lines
per 100) and is often used as an indicator of economic well-being. There is evidence to show that
telephones have a high correlation with GDP per capita. Broadly we can say that if a country has a one
per cent higher mobile phone subscription rate than another, its GDP per capita will be about $200
higher [1].
With over 300 phone subscribers, India has one of the largest of phone connections in the world, second
only to China. However a close look at the distribution of phone lines shows the great digital divide
between the urban and rural India. While the urban areas have achieved teledensity of over 70%, the
rural markets, with a teledensity of less than 15% have been deprived of telecom services.
This paper presents the current status of rural Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and
identifies major road blocks in wide spread development of the same in rural India. It also highlights the
inadequacy of some the solutions being adopted, in form of regulatory policies, technologies and
ecosystem development, and offers alternate suggestions towards fixing the digital divide. The primary
focus of this report is on the wireless phones and high speed data services aspects of ICT. The Village
Public Telephone (VPT), which was conceived in the 8th five year plan has been rolled out in 95% of the
villages, and Rural Direct Exchange Lines (RDELs) are not evaluated in this report.
This report builds on the prior research work done by Prof Rekha Jain, on this subject. It specifically does
a critical evaluation of the USOF policy framework and takes a close look at the technological options
available for rural ICT. Primary research has been done in from of telephonic interviews of managers of
two large service providers (Tata Communication and Reliance Communication) to understand their
view on rural communication with focus on usage of WiMAX to solve rural ICT problems. Secondary
research has been conducted using resources mentioned in the reference section on this report.
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 4
End of Monopoly
Up till 1984 telecom services were under state control with the department of Posts and Telegraph
(P&T). In January 1985 telephone services were moved out from P&T and a Department of
Telecommunication (DoT), having a complete monopoly on telecom sector, was established. Telecom
sector under the monopolistic control of state run enterprise was an industry plagued with inefficiencies
and corruption. There were only 0.8 connections per hundred citizens (1994 data) far below the
worldwide standard of 10 per 100, and even lower than Pakistan’s 2 per 100. There were 8 million lines
with 2.5 million new telephone connection applications pending.
In 1994, Government of India started the process of opening up of the telecom sector with the
announcement of the National Telecom Policy (NTP). NTP target was to have a telephone connection
available on demand by 1997 and to introduce international standard Value Added Services (VAS) over
the telecom network. The 1994 NTP allowed private operators to provide mobile services. From 1994 to
government has taken several steps to open up mobile, basic telephone, long distance telephony and
internet (including broadband) services in the country.
Telecom Industry Surges Ahead
The Indian telecom industry has evolved as one of the fastest-growing sectors in the country. In the last
few months, monthly subscriber additions have averaged over 9 million, which is the fastest growth in
subscriber base world has ever seen. Wireless teledensity in India has quadrupled in the last four years,
to reach 28% in quarter ending June-2008. On 18th June 2008, India became the country with the 2nd
largest number of phone subscribers, after China, having crossed the 300 million telephone subscriber’s
milestone [3].
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 5
Figure 1: Number of telecom subscribers
Source: TRAI
However, the growth in operator revenue has not kept pace with the growth of subscriber based due to
sharp fall in ARPU. All India blended ARPU for GSM (per month) for the year ended March 2008
decreased by 11% to Rs 264 as compared with Rs 298 for the year ending March 2007. While ARPU for
post-paid services increased by 4.1% from Rs 613 in March 2007 to Rs 638 in March 2008. Prepaid ARPU
declined by 10.4% from Rs 250 in March 2007 to Rs 224 in March 2008.
Figure 2: Growth in revenue of GSM operators
Quarter Ending Revenue in INR Crores
Quarterly Growth of
Revenues
Quarterly Growth of
Subscriber Base
QE-Mar-07 10,040 8.40% 8.4%
QE-Jun-07 11,336 12.90% 9.3%
QE-Sep-07 11,903 5.00% 10.5%
QE-Dec-07 12,738 7.00% 9.7%
QE-Mar-08 14,329 12.50% 10.1%
Source: TRAI
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 6
Apart from the growth in the subscriber base, India has also witnessed a significant growth in telecom
R&D, manufacturing and product development. World's leading telecom handsets manufacturers, such
as Nokia, Samsung, Motorola and LG have their presence in India, along with leading equipment
manufacturers like Ericsson, Nokia-Siemens, Alcatel-Lucent, Motorola, Qualcomm etc.
The next wave of growth is expected to be driven by the roll our of 3G and Wireless Broadband Access
(WBA) networks. Fall in revenues from voice-based services are expected to be compensated by an
increase in Value Added Services (VAS). Currently, VAS in India accounts for 10 per cent of the operator's
revenue but is expected to reach 18 per cent by 2010, generating total revenue of over USD 5 billion [1].
India's mobile subscriber base is projected to exceed 737 million connections by 2012 growing at a CAGR
of 21 per cent. The overall cellular services revenue in India is projected to grow at a CAGR of 18 per
cent from 2008-2012 to exceed US$ 37 billion [2].
Myriads of Government Bodies
Before going further it is important to understand the role of multiple government agencies, around
which the telecommunication industry operates. At the helm of the affair is the Ministry of
Communication and Information Technology (MoCIT). MoCIT is the country’s policy maker with respect
to telecom, posts and telegraph and other means of communications. Within the purview of MoCIT
there are primarily three departments (there are many others) which oversee the working of telecom
industry.
First is the Department of Telecommunications (DoT), which has necessary executive, administrative and
financial powers to deal with various aspects of telecommunications. The department is vested with the
functions of policy formulation, licensing, wireless spectrum management, administrative monitoring of
Public Sector Units (PSUs), research & development and standardization etc.
The second agency is the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). TRAI has a five fold function i.e.,
(a) promotion of efficiency and competition (b) regulate arrangements amongst service providers (c)
tariff fixation (d) laying down of standards for quality of service and (e) establishing and implementing
universal service obligations. While originally the above functions were to be discharged with regard to
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 7
the telecom sector alone, its reach has now been widened to discharge the above said functions with
regard to both broadcasting and cable services.
The third authority is TDSAT or Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal established under
Section 14 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India. This authority functions largely as an appellate
authority before which the orders of TRAI can be challenged. Its also has some original jurisdiction over
class consumer disputes.
Figure 3: Main telecom administrative bodies and their roles
Ministry of Communications and Information Technology
Department of Telecommunications
(DoT)
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
(TRAI)
Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate
(TDSAT)
Policy formulation
Licensing
Wireless spectrum management
Administrative monitoring of Public Sector Units (PSUs)
Research & development and standardization
Regulate arrangements amongst service providers
Tariff fixation
Laying down of standards for quality of service
Establishing and implementing universal service obligations
Promotion of efficiency and competition
Adjudication and disposal of disputes between operators/consumers
Appellate authority with whom TRAI orders can be challenged
Effective Measure of Rural ICT
With a teledensity of over 70%, urban teledensity is significantly higher than the rural teledensity of just
13%. More worrisome, however, is the fact that this gap has been increasing year on year even when
government has been trying to improve rural ICT through several measures [3].
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 8
Figure 4: Comparison of total, urban and rural teledensity
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80M
ar-9
8
Nov
-98
Jul-9
9
Mar
-00
Nov
-00
Jul-0
1
Mar
-02
Nov
-02
Jul-0
3
Mar
-04
Nov
-04
Jul-0
5
Mar
-06
Nov
-06
Jul-0
7
Mar
-08
Total Teledensity
Urban Teledensity
Rural Teledensity
Teledensity has been used as a parameter to compare the spread of ICT between rural and urban India.
However, is teledensity a right parameter to compare urban and rural ICT? To understand this we should
understand a fundamental difference between the Mobile usage patter between and urban customer
and a rural one. In urban India, like the rest of the world, mobile is considered as a personal
communication device. Hence it is common for households to have multiple mobile phones. In a sharp
contrast to this mobile phone in village is considered as a substitute to the land line, and hence it is
reasonable to expect one mobile phone per household to start with.
With rural population expected to be 832 million (in 2010), the maximum number of rural subscribers
on household basis can be expected to be around 180 million. There are already 100 million rural
subscribers and hence a short term target would be to add another 100 million subscribers in next
couple of years, at monthly subscriber growth rate of average 4-5 million. This would mean that a rural
teledensity needed in short term is around 25%, a number far lower than the current urban teledensity
of 70%.
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 9
Based on the arguments above it is appropriate to also measure the spread of ICT in terms of
“coverage”, that is the percentage of villages which have telephone coverage. With 69% of villages
covered by mobile network, we have come a long way in last decade. The challenge is to increase the
mobile coverage to 100% so that every citizen in the country has “access” to a mobile phone within
his/her village.
Another important measure of the spread of ICT is the density of population having data services
(broadband or low speed data). Both “teledensity” and “coverage” measurements do not explicitly
factor in the spread of data services to rural India. TRAI quarterly reports publish the number of wireline
internet subscribers and number of broadband subscribers. However, it does not provide data about
how many of these data (internet and broadband) subscribers are from in rural India. Given the state of
rural ICT it is safe to assume that the spread of data services in rural India is far below its teledensity of
13.
Hence, an effectively measure of health of rural ICT includes teledensity and coverage data. In both
these measures it is important to include both data and voice services. The immediate target should be
get high coverage of data and voice services (>90%) so that every citizen of the country has access to ICT
while simultaneously targeting an average rural teledensity of 25, on a region by region basis.
Obstacles in Achieving ICT Targets
Fulfillment of short term targets (by 2012) for rural ICT, outlined in the section above, will require
significant changes in the regulatory, infrastructure, social, economical and political working on the
country. The major road blocks will have to be identified and plans drawn up to overcome each of these
road blocks.
In this section, major road blocks in meeting ICT targets are identified.
Poor Infrastructure
Electricity
Availability of electricity or lack there of, is one of the biggest challenges adversely affecting the rollout
of services and sustained functioning of rural telecom facilities. At many as 20% of villages (1,20,000 in
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 10
number) do not have electricity supply. Even in villages which do have electricity supply, it is often
difficult to get state electricity boards to give electric connection to the BTSs since state governments
have not identified telecom as a priority sector. As a result, BTSs in a large number of rural areas run on
generator power. The use of generators in such remote un-accessible rural areas further increases the
cost of operations and makes the service economically unviable. Additionally, the electricity used in
rural telecom systems are charged at full commercial tariff further increasing the opex of rural ICT.
Apart from the problem on the equipment side, the lack of electricity in consumer home/kiosks is also a
major obstacle. The spread of internet has been significantly hindered due to non availability of regular
electric supply in rural India. The villages that do not have electricity connection need to have
generators/UPSs for powering PC which make the usage economically unviable; even when the
computer is shared between large number of villagers.
Figure 5: Electricity Vs Mobile coverage in villages
State/Service Area
Total No
of
districts
DHQ
covered
by
mobile
Total No.
of
inhabited
Villages
(2001)
Villages
covered
by
mobile
Villages
covered
by
electricity
% Rural
Electric
Coverage
% Rural
Mobile
Coverage
Andhra Pradesh 23 23 26613 19393 26565 100 73
Assam 23 23 25124 10041 19081 76 40
Bihar including Jharkhand 59 59 68369 48050 26892 39 70
Delhi 9 9 158 158 158 100 100
Gujarat 28 28 18159 11856 17940 99 65
Haryana 20 20 6764 6764 6759 100 100
Himachal Pradesh 12 12 17495 8370 16891 97 48
Jammu and Kashmir 14 14 6417 3018 6301 98 47
Karnataka 28 28 27481 25000 26771 97 91
Kerala Including
Lakshadweep 15 15 1372 1372 1372 100 100
MP Including
Chhattisgarh 66 66 71861 23928 69006 96 33
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 11
Maharashtra including
Goa 37 37 41442 16386 40351 97 40
North East 52 30 14803 2506 10119 68 17
Orissa 30 30 47529 28000 37663 79 59
Punjab 21 21 12301 10845 12228 99 88
Rajasthan 32 32 39752 26835 37276 94 68
Tamil Nadu including
Pondicherry 34 34 15492 15492 15480 100 100
UP Including Uttaranchal 83 83 113703 112761 70173 62 99
West Bengal Including
Andaman and Sikkim 24 24 38896 36337 32110 83 93
Total 610 588 593731 407112 473136 80 69
Source: TRAI
Backhaul connectivity
Rural India suffers from poor availability of backhaul connectivity. Unlike urban areas where OFC is
largely deployed to provide the backhaul connection, about 80% of the rural BTS (84458 out of 1,06,518
BTSs) [1] are on microwave system. Laying of OFC has been slow and expensive propositions due to
bureaucracy and corruption involved in getting the “Right of Way” (RoW) which is discussed later in
more details.
Figure 6: Telecom resources (as of Sept 2008)
1
Total Number of Telephone subscribers (Wireline + Wireless in
million) 353.66
a Rural(million) 101.71
b Urban (million) 251.95
2 Total number of Wireless subscribers (million) 315.31
a Rural(million) 90.76
b Urban(million) 224.55
3 Teledensity 30.64
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 12
a Rural 12.74
b Urban 72.47
4 Total Number of Telephone Exchanges of BSNL 38,202
a Rural 29,492
b Urban 8,710
5 BTSs
a Rural 1,06,518
b Rural Shared 29,723
c Total BTS including Urban 2,22,137
6 Connectivity of Rural BTSs
a No. of BTS on OFC/UG Cable 21,795
b Microwave 84,458
c Satellite Link 265
Source: TRAI
When backhauls based on OFC or Microwave are not available, service providers use satellite links as
backhaul. Getting VSAT links requires long approval process involving DoT, ISRO, NOCC and WPC
(between 6months to 1 year, mainly due to delay at DoT)[1]. Additionally, the satellite segment charges
of ISRO, monitoring charges by NOCC and WPC spectrum charges makes it a very costly to use satellite
links for rural backhaul.
Last Mile
Last mile in rural India does not exist. Last mile spread is limited mostly to the recently deployed RDEL’s
and hence all new wireline connection requires putting last mile copper. The cost of laying down last
mile is prohibitive.
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 13
Roads and Supply Chain
The poor quality of road and supply chain in rural India increases the operating expenditure. Rural BTSs
require regular bio fuel and spare parts for up keep. Lack of proper supply chain (and condition of roads)
make is both expensive and time taking to get these to rural BTS locations.
Unviable Economics
Low Revenue and High Operating Expenses
One can look at Revenue as a product of the number of subscriber and the ARPU.
India is a large country with an area of about 3,287,000 square kilometers. Rural India is sparsely
populated with approximately 750 million people spread over 600,000 villages, more than half of these
have population of under 1000. Hence the number of subscriber per BTS is low in rural India.
The other challenge of rural ICT is the low Average Revenue per User (ARPU). Even at national level,
India has an overall low ARPU of less than $7 which falls further to approx $ 2 for rural areas.
Hence, revenue generating capability per BTS in rural India is far lower than urban regions.
Figure 7: ARPU in Rs per month for QE-Mar-08
Circle Postpaid Prepaid Blended ARPU
Circle A 632 225 264
Circle B 543 214 232
Circle C 590 244 266
Metro 712 235 333
All India 638 224 264
Source: TRAI
What makes matter worse is that the operation and maintenance cost of rural ICT is significantly higher
than urban India. These are primarily due to the lack of electricity, non availability of trained technicians
in rural locations and poor availability of spare parts.
As an example, let’s understand the operation cost of a BTS on diesel generator in a village which has no
connection to power grid. Typically, BTS sites are backed by a 15-25 KVA diesel generators. A typical 15
KVA diesel generators consumes over 2.5 ltr of diesel every hour [12]. Assuming diesel price of Rs 35 per
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 14
liter, an operator would have to spend close to Rs 0.8 million just on a diesel procurements charges.
Include the cost of transporting diesel, and factoring that a lot of generators are 25 KVA or higher, the
diesel cost per year per BTS jumps to upwards of Rs 1 million per year. Going with an average ARPU Rs
1200 per annum, an operator needs approx 833 subscribers per BTS or 1 BTS for a population ~6500
people (factoring in current rural teledensity of 13%). This means just to recover the cost of diesel for
one BTS – it (that 1 BTS) has to exclusively cover 5-7 villages (average village populations of 1000). This
gives us the sense of the huge gap in operating expense of rural ICT and its revenue generating
capabilities.
Affordability of ICT
Rural India has lower per capita income than urban India. The startup capital for a new phone
connection, which is still upwards of Rs 2000, is outside the reach of a common villager.
The cost of for internet access is even higher primarily driven by high cost of desktop computers and the
need for expensive UPSs/generators to run them.
Hence a lot of villagers are not able to afford personal phones even when they are available in their
villages.
Lack of Appropriate Content
Low regional content available
The lack of relevant regional content available on data networks has significantly limited the role of ICT
to primarily a “voice only service”. ICT as a voice only service is also hampered because of the
negativities of “network effect” – a problem where villager does not knows anyone who has a phone,
and hence has no need to make phone calls.
Supplementary industries
The lack of supplementary industries like tele-medicine, distance education, micro finance, E-
Governance etc, has also prevented the wide spread use of ICT in rural India.
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 15
Unfriendly Local Government Rules
Acquisition of land
Acquisition of land for deployment of telecommunication equipment is rather slow and cumbersome.
There are many rural only issue like forest land, land owned by reserved category people, tribal land,
agriculture land etc which make it more difficult to acquire necessary permissions.
Right of way
As mentioned before, rural India suffers from significant deficiencies in underground OFC and last mile.
However, operators trying to lay down new cable face significant obstacle in getting clearances from
multiple civil authorities (multiple gram panchayats, forest officials etc). Even getting permissions to lay
down cable along a kaccha road requires long lead times and exorbitantly high amount of money.
Social Norms
Usage of mobile phone as replacement for land line
For rural families phone is not a personal object. Mobile phones, like land line, are used by the entire
house hold. Assuming an average household consist of 4 members, a teledensity of 25 could means that
every person in the village has access to mobile phone in his house. Unless this attitude of rural family
changes (is there a need to change this?) the rural teledensity will remain low.
Low literacy levels
Low literacy level of rural population impacts their ability to use phones and even more significantly the
usage of data services. As literacy levels increase there is going to be an inherent growth in demand for
ICT from rural population.
Lack of Innovation in Technology Development
Some of the challenges of deploying ICT in rural India could have been overcome by innovation and new
technology development. So far very little progress has been made is developing and deploying systems
which have been designed specially to overcome challenges of rural India.
Currently most of the rural ICT are landlines (VPT, RDEL, PCO – both voice and data) or wireless systems
based on GSM and CDMA networks (mobile and WLL) technologies. None of these networks standards
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 16
were developed specially for rural ICT. These networks are suitable for urban, high population density
deployments and not for deployment in sparsely populated rural area.
Land lines based phones and data connection avoid some of the problems faced by rural ICT like the
electricity connection to rural BTSs, the operations and maintenance issues etc. However, land lines
have significant disadvantages in rural setup due to the missing last mile. As discussed before laying
down last mile cable requires high capital expenditure and there are significant Right of Way issues.
Wireless networks (GSM and CDMA) avoid the problem of costly wires and Right of Way issues, but they
suffer extensively from the lack of infrastructure. These networks are high on power consumption and
the lack of electricity grid, as discussed earlier, requires that the rural BTS’s be run on diesel generators
which increases the operating cost of these networks. Additionally, these wireless networks are very
complex to setup and requires skill professionals for the upkeep of the network – making it unsuitable
for rural deployments.
CorDect, developed by the TeNet Group, is a rare example of indigenously developed technology for
rural ICT. CorDect is based on fixed Wireless Local Loop (WLL) technology. corDECT provides the most
cost effective per-line cost available in country. The point-to-multipoint wireless radio frequency
technology supports simultaneous voice and data channels of 35-70 kbps to subscribers within a 10 km
radius of its broadcast location. Coverage is extendable up to 25 km through the use of a repeater. Its
low costs, ease of deployment, and minimal maintenance requirements make corDECT ideally suited for
rural use. However, CorDect has not seen widespread deployment by major operators mostly because it
is seen as a proprietary technology and does not have a full eco-system support consisting of multiple
suppliers, standardization bodies etc.
Lack of infrastructure sharing
According to industry estimate, setting up a cellular tower (BTS) cost around Rs.50 lakhs inclusive of
equipment, power plant, etc [12]. Urban India has seen a surge in number of shared towers between
competing operators. The creation of telecom infrastructure companies like Quippo, Xcel, GTL etc have
created an eco-system where operators find it economically beneficial to share infrastructure. However,
in rural India sharing of tower has been extremely low. Out of 1,06,518 towers deployed in rural India
only 29723 towers are shared[1]. This is primarily because the incumbent operators, BSNL, owns
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 17
majority of the rural infrastructure and uses it as a source of competitive advantage. It is in no mood to
give away it first mover advantage by sharing its rural infrastructure with other competitors.
Regulatory Issues
Universal Service Obligation was introduced in NTP 99 view the aim to provide every citizen of the
country, access to basic telecom services at affordable and reasonable prices [13]. The Government the
following universal service objectives:
1. Provide voice and low speed data service to the balance 2.9 lakh uncovered villages in the
country by the year 2002
2. Achieve Internet access to all district head quarters by the year 2000
3. Achieve telephone on demand in urban and rural areas by 2002
NTP 99 also created a Universal Service Obligation Fund (USOF) to fund the USO. It was decided that
USOF should be raised through a 'universal access levy' which would be 5% of the Adjusted Gross
Revenue (AGR) earned by all telecom service providers except the pure value added service providers
like Internet, Voice Mail, E-Mail service providers etc.
USOF is headed by the Administrator whose responsibilities include formulation of procedures for
selection and approval of projects, disbursement from the fund and the overall implementation of the
project under USO funding. The Office of USOF Administrator functions as an attached office of the
Department of Telecom, Ministry of Communications and IT.
USOF is expected to fund the following streams:
Stream I -> Installation and maintenance of VPT, replacement of MARRT1
Stream II -> Provision for RDELs
Stream III ->Creation of infrastructure for mobile service in rural areas
Stream IV -> Broadband connectivity to villages
Stream V -> General infrastructure for providing ICT in rural area
Stream VI -> New technology development for rural use
1 Multi Access Radio Relay Technology
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 18
Even though USOF was established with a view to promote rural ICT, there have been several
implementation and policies issues which have limited the effectiveness of USOF.
Low level of utilization
With a total fund of Rs 20404 crore USOF in India is second only the USOF in the US. However, a very
small portion of USOF has actually been disbursed in the last 5 years. As of Dec 2008 only Rs 6723 crore
were committed for rural infrastructure development.
Even in the Rs 6723 crore which has been committed almost 20% of the money has been used for new
VPT and MARRT replacements and 75% of the money has been used for RDELs. Majority of the USOF
allocations has happened to BSNL, the government owned incumbent.
The amount of money allocated to wireless infrastructure development has been miniscule.
Inefficiencies in USOF disbursement processes
As discussed above only 32% of USOF fund has been allocated for use, of which only 5% is allocated
towards wireless infrastructure. BSNL has won 78% of contracts for USOF supported tower constructions
but has made little on no progress on its contractual obligations. 90% of towers owned by BSNL are
incomplete.
The lack of progress with USOF funded wireless infrastructure can be pinned downed to number of
inefficiencies in the USOF disbursement process.
Bidding process: India’s USOF is given out based on a reverse bidding process. The bidding starts at a
predefined benchmark and bid downwards. The firm bidding the lowest bid amount is eligible to be
reimbursed that amount from USOF for the identified project. Benchmarks were set using cost
information primarily from the incumbent, BSNL are often unviable. Additionally, the bidding process
has long lead times of up to 9 months.
Restrictions on usage of USOF funds: Even though the objective of USOF is to support the net cost (Cost
– Revenue), the administrator of USOF is disbursing funds only for infrastructure creation that too
mostly limited to BTS tower. Other expensive items like the backhaul are not covered. This approach will
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 19
lead to creation of infrastructure towers, but since the operating costs are not covered, operators price
their services higher (to recover operating expenses) which reduces telephone off take. This will result in
an increase in “coverage” but not in “teledensity”.
The other restriction of USOF disbursement is that only one operator is supported by USOF per area.
This restriction reduces the competitive landscape since once BSNL wins a USOF contract for a particular
area A, it effectively locks that location off from other operators. Even though the timelines of
infrastructure deployment are specified in the contracts, they are rarely followed and penalties are
rarely imposed.
Yet another restriction with USOF is that the location of USOF funded tower is decided by USOF
administrator. Most operators feel that once the rural Short Distrance Calling Area (SDCAs) have been
identified where the mobile infrastructure needs to be installed, then the choice of location and the
number of towers required in that area should be left to the discretion of the service providers. Given
that there is a large gap between the Capex required to erect towers and the average subsidy given
from USOF, operators will have no incentive of setting up extra towers just for the sake of subsidy.
Overcoming the Hurdles
Policy and Administration Changes in USOF
It is clear that USOF has not been effective in creating a significant off take of rural ICT. As discussed
above there are both policy issues and well as implementation issues which need to be addressed to
make USOF more effective.
The most important change that needs to be done in USOF is to increase the utilization of USOF
disbursements. Some operators have argued that the percentage of USO contribution should be
reduced to less than 5% given that there is large amount of unused USOF lying around. While on the
other side other operators have argued that the percentage contribution to USO should be made
flexible and decided at the beginning of the year as to what percentage should be contributed.
Neither of these arguments makes sense. The reduction in percentage contributions towards USOF is
not warranted since significant parts of the country (over 31%) still does not have wireless coverage, and
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 20
most of these areas are rural areas which can benefit from USOF support. The second argument of
flexible percentage contribution to USO will result in a significant increase in operators financial
uncertainty and cause cash flow fluctuations from year to year.
The solution to the large build up of funds in the USOF is to understand and improve the way USOF is
administered, which includes the overall USOF objectives for the year, bidding, tracking and fund
disbursements processes. USOF today does not have a well defined plan with clearly identified targets
on year by year basis. The first step would be define a rolling year on year target for the USOF
administrator, to which s/he needs to be held accountable.
The next step in USOF administration is to define what costs will be covered under USOF. This should be
driven by the overall objective of USOF, that is an increase in both “coverage” and “teledensity”. As
discussed before providing USOF support for VPT, Replacement of MARRT, RDELs and mobile
infrastructure (limited to towers) is helping increase coverage. The teledensity is being address only in a
limited way through RDELs. To increase mobile teledensity USOF administrator needs to look at covering
net cost (Cost – Revenues). The cost in this case would include the backhaul, land cost, operations cost
(fuel, security, maintenance), CEP etc. The aim is to keep the tariff under a certain critical threshold level
which allows a significant increase in teledensity. USOF support should also be available to deployment
of broadband services in government run hospitals, schools and colleges. To encourage growth of data
services local content is essential. USOF fund could be made available to development of local/regional
content.
The current bidding process needs to be re-looked and un-necessary constrains like the exact location of
the tower, limiting USOF support to only one operator per area should be abolished. TRAI study paper
published in Dec 2008 [1] states “The USOF should do away with the bidding process and only
concentrate on planning and monitoring of the implementation of the scheme. Based on the experience
of Phase-I, it should determine the subsidy support for setting up towers in different regions and any IP-
I/CMTS/UASL operator, who sets up the tower in designated Short Distance Calling Area (SDCAs) should
be paid subsidy, irrespective of whether the tower is used by one operator or more than one.” A
mechanism like the one stated above would encourage competition between the operators to roll out
their networks in rural area quickly. However, it is suggested that the subsidy provided by USOF be such
that it promotes sharing of towers by various operators rather than encouraging each operator to setup
its own towers.
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 21
Once the administrator has freed himself off the bidding responsibilities he will have more time for
monitoring of projects sponsored by USOF. A regular dashboard based monitoring of the projects needs
to be done, so that issues arising in the execution phase can be tracked on regular basis and feedback to
the decision making bodies can be provided. USOF Administrator should be able to impose penalties on
any schedule slippages. Currently, even though penalty clauses exist they are rarely imposed. The bigger
problem is that there is no clarity as to why majority of BSNL USOF supported infrastructure activities
are behind schedule. Is this a systemic problem?
For USOF administrator to function independently and fairly, it should to be separated from the DoT. As
per TRAI recommendation “A High Power Governing Council comprising of the representatives from
Department of Telecom, Information Technology, Education, Health and Rural Development could be
constituted for necessary guidance and inter-ministerial coordination” [1]. This independent committee
will have the authority and will to take action on incumbent operators who are not able to (or not
willing) to live up to the USOF supported infrastructure roll out plans.
Backhaul
Rural India suffers from the lack of OFC backbone which can be used as the backhaul and hence depends
extensively on the microwave and VSAT technology for backhaul usage. Hence the short term need is to
increase the availability of microwave and VSAT for backhaul usage. USOF subsidies should be provided
for the appropriate backhaul solutions adopted by the operators.
WiMAX is a possible solution for a point to point backhaul network. Combining capacity, distance, and
secure licensed frequencies, WiMAX can provide an economically viable backhaul solution for rural
WiMAX networks. Spectrum efficiency (payload/Hz) is enhanced using sophisticated modulation
techniques, up to 64QAM. Channels as narrow as 1.75MHz can transport 8.6Mbit/s, increasing to
65.4Mbit/s for 14MHz channels. Such capacity can readily support WiMAX base-stations scaled to
support low customer densities typical in rural areas.
Given that WiMAX has the necessary eco-system with standardization bodies defining standards and
multiple equipment manufacturers offering standards compliant interoperable solutions, the chances
are that WiMAX solution might result in large scale deployment. The sub 900 MHz spectrum has
superior propagation characteristics and is better suited for rural deployments. It is recommended that
DoT issues the 700 MHz spectrum for point to point WiMAX backhaul network.
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 22
Similarly, VSAT links should be made available to service provides in a time bound economical manner to
connect their remote BTSs to their core networks. Currently VSAT links suffers from long delays due to
multiple clearance agencies involved and the high cost charged by ISRO. DoT/TRAI should set up
tripartite agreements with other government bodies for ensure quick and economical access to VSAT
links wherever required.
In the long run bandwidth provided by Microwave or VSAT will not be sufficient to cater to the
bandwidth hungry applications like entertainment, tele-education etc. For these applications an optical
fiber network is required to be available up to the mobile towers. Currently around 6.7 lakh route
kilometers of optical fiber is present across India. Out of the existing 29000 rural exchanges of the
incumbent (BSNL) in the country, majority of them (around 70%) have OFC connectivity. However,
majority of this connectivity has very low bandwidth (8 Mbps) and therefore can not be shared. This
bandwidth should be upgraded to STM-1 by USOF and BSNL should be mandated to share at least 2/3rd
of the enhanced bandwidth with other service providers.
Additionally, it is important to look at the entire OFC network in the country as a national resource
which can be shared between competing operators at an appropriate cost. The OFC network in India has
improved significantly over the years. Numbers of non traditional telecom companies (like GAIL,
RAILTEL, Power Grid) have laid down large OFC networks which can be used for rural ICT.
Collaboration with Local Governments
Rural telecom has been severely impacted due to non corporation from local government. We had
discussed some of the issues like Right of Way, access to land , connection to electricity grid, high
commercial changes for electricity used in rural ICT etc in previous sections.
In states where local governments have come forward to help the spread of rural ICT have done much
better than other states where local government has been passive, or in some cases obstructive. States
like Kerala, Himachal Pradesh and Punjab have achieved higher teledensity (over 20 against a national
average of 13). DoT must try to work with the local and state governments to ensure their full support.
The direct correlation between economic well being of a region to its teledensity must be sold to the
governments to enlist their support. However, given the level of corruption in some states this is an
uphill task.
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 23
On the data communication side, the role of state government becomes even more important. The data
collected from number of government and NGO rural initiatives have shown that the projects which
have local government backing have better chance of long term sustainability and spread. E-Governance
applications have been significant drivers for adoption of ICT in rural India in many states.
Develop Supplementary Industries
Supplementary industries like education, health, entertainment, e-governance, microfinance increase
the appeal of ICT for the rural masses. Development of these industries will have a significant positive
rub off on the off take of rural data services.
The supplementary industries/applications can be sub-divided into three types of offerings [10]:
1. Informational services disseminate generic (non-customized) information, such as education,
information on agricultural practices, weather forecasts, and contact information.
2. Transactional services involve an exchange of specific (or customized) informational services or
funds between two or more parties using the ICT infrastructure. Examples include micro
finance, e- commerce and email.
3. eGovernance services refer to transactional services that involve local, state, or national
government. Providing land records, submitting user complaints to local officials, and
confirming a user’s presence on electoral rolls are examples.
It is important to develop these applications types in local languages so that vast masses of rural
population can use them. The increase of teledensity will largely depend on the success of these
applications.
Technology Innovation
The development of rural telephony presents some unique challenges which have been extensively
dealt with in the initial part of this paper. Technology can be used to overcome some of these challenges
as proven by the corDECT system designed by TeNET.
The Indian design and deployment of corDECT, a system based on the original digital cordless system,
DECT, offers a potential solution to problems of rural ICT. The corDECT system provides extended
coverage of about 10 km for about half the price of standard WLL. The corDECT system also provides
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 24
some mobility, which the WLL systems do not. Another advantage of corDECT is its ability to provide
data connections with speeds up to 70 kbps. CorDECT is probably the most innovative indigenously
developed solution for rural ICT. However, corDECT has had limited success in the vast country with
huge rural ICT needs. This is primarily because of lack of eco system for corDECT system. corDECT is seen
as a proprietary technology. Major service provides have not fully committed to this technology for the
fear of dependency on a small group of researchers.
The corDECT experience provides some valuable lessons. It shows that there are two things that are
needed for widespread deployment of a technology. The first, and the more obvious one, is that the
technology should be suitable for the problem it is trying to address, should be cost effective and should
meet the regulatory needs. The second, and the more important, message is that a new technology
needs to have a critical eco system support to be considered for widespread use. Eco system support
includes, at the minimum, a standardization body which defines the standards that all equipment
providers adhere too, provides certification of equipment manufactured by various equipment providers
etc. The eco system would also include at least a handful of major equipment providers who develop
equipment as per the standard specification, perform interoperability tests with other vendors etc.
corDECT failed to build a suitable eco system support.
The good news is that India is soon going to auction 3G spectrum to the service provides. 3G spectrum
offers around 4-5 times the voice capacity of 2G spectrum which helps with the economies of rural ICT.
3G can also be a way forward to achieve the Government’s broadband objectives. In addition, it will be a
good solution for education, telemedicine, etc. 3G could thus be a key tool that could be used to deliver
extremely affordable voice and drive teledensity in rural India.
As a proof of concept that 3G services can be commercially deployed for rural ICT, Ericsson has started a
rural service called “Gramjyoti”. Gramjyoti is a HSPA-powered rural broadband demo network that
delivers the benefits of 3G across 18 villages and 15 towns in Tamil Nadu. As a part of this select group
of villages and towns are now a part of the internet and broadband revolution. Villagers can visit the
citizen centers at Manamai, Thiruvidanthai & Vadugambadi, to log into a high speed internet connection
and know the latest selling rates of agriculture produce. Children can be taught through distance
education, by a teacher sitting in Delhi. Villagers can get treated by doctors, who will interact through
video-conferencing from Chennai, when the Gramjyoti van visits their village.
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 25
We have already discussed the use of WiMAX as a solution for backhaul problem. WiMAX can also be
used in the point to multipoint mode to solve the last mile problem in rural ICT. BSNL has already started
significant WiMAX deployments in rural India and aim to cover as many at 16000 villages by end of 2009.
There are innumerable debates around the suitability of 3G as a solution for rural ICT vis-à-vis the
WiMAX solution. There are pros and cons on both sides (WiMAX offers significantly higher range than
3G, 3G broadband speed does not fall as quickly with distance as it does for WiMAX etc). In this paper I
do not dwell in detailed evaluation of these technologies as it is evident that both technologies have a
play depending on objectives of service provider and environmental conditions in which the network is
being deployed.
While new standards like HSxPA and WiMAX are being hotly debated, there are yet other innovations
being targeted towards rural ICT. A case in point is the development of WorldGSM by Vihaan Networks
Limited (VNL). VNL believes that voice is the primary driver for rural ICT and hence has focused its
energies on developing a rural solutions based on GSM technology. To address the rural market, VNL has
designed the WorldGSM™ solution with the following characteristics:
1. Low power: at less than 100W per Base Station, the entire system can be run on solar power.
No power grid or generator is necessary.
2. Low cost: a fraction of the cost of traditional GSM Base Stations. It is therefore profitable at
very low densities and ARPUs.
3. Fully GSM standards compliant: easily links to existing networks, dramatically extending their
reach.
4. Self contained: With BSC and MSC functionality integrated and deployed in the field on Base
Station towers.
5. Self deploying: the entire WorldGSM™ Base Station packs into two carts and is easily installed
by unskilled field staff that may not be able to read or write. It does not require buildings, power
or air conditioning. The installer has only to point it south and turn it on.
6. Near Zero Maintenance: top up the batteries every three months; update software remotely
and perform simple swap repairs if needed.
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 26
7. Cascading Star Architecture™: a unique, modular architecture optimized for low-cost rural
expansion; with local switching to minimize backhaul.
Another area where technology can play a significant role is in managing the fuel cost in rural areas
where there is no connection to electric grid. To run their telecom networks in India, operators have to
spend billions on power and fuel. Energy management is the biggest component of an operator's
operating expenditure. According to an ABI research report, network infrastructure accounts for 80% of
this opex. Therefore, operators are focusing on reducing power consumed per BTS site.
Idea Cellular, Ericsson and the GSMA's Development Fund teamed up to develop bio-fuels as a power
source for wireless networks in rural India. In a pilot project, bio-fuels were used to power mobile base
stations located in Latur, Maharashtra, where main electricity is highly unreliable. In the first phase, four
BTSs in the Maharashtra circle were powered by bio-fuels. After completion of this phase, Idea started
powering approximately 350 base stations in Andhra Pradesh with waste cooking oil. These base
stations were made to run on 80:20 blend of diesel fuel and non-edible oil. The green project success in
AP can be attributed to a favorable ecosystem in the region where an entrepreneur was engaged for
sourcing, blending and distribution of the fuel [11]. Reliance is looking for an opportunity to deploy wind
and solar energy solutions to run their sites. It targets to run approximately 10,000 sites using renewable
energy sources. As an alternative to diesel, Tata Teleservices is experimenting with Liquefied Petroleum
Gas (LPG).
Innovations like Gramjyoti and WorldGSM are expected to drive growth of rural ICT in the coming years.
After a lull of a decade suddenly there has been a spurt of new technical developments which solve the
problems faced by rural telephony. On the other side, the ongoing experiments with bio-fuels and
alternate energy might throw up innovative solutions which could help reduce the largest opex item of
rural ICT. These are indeed exciting times for rural telecommunication.
Conclusion
Rural ICT in India is on the high growth path; Teledensity targets set in NTP 99 for year 2012 had already
been surpassed in 2008. Government has set up policy framework to further increase the growth of
rural ICT. USOF is the most significant piece in the policy framework designed to grow rural teledensity
and coverage.
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 27
However, there are significant problems which limit the widespread adoption of ICT in rural India. These
issues must be fixed for continued growth and development of rural telephony.
The primary changes recommended in this report are:
Changes in Policy and Administration in USOF
o Laying out objective of USOF
o Scope of funding under USOF
o Changes in administrative process (No bidding, no limitation on number of operators using USOF support per area, location of tower not decided by administrator, monitoring of USOF funded project)
Backhaul Improvements
o Improvements in OFC using USOF funding. Re-use of OFC backbone of GAIL, Railtel etc
o Usage of WiMAX in backhaul. Auction of 700 MHz spectrum.
o Easing of regulations and controls around VSAT use
Building Collaboration with Local Governments to fix issues with right of way, access to land,
connection to power grid, discounts on electricity charges, reductions of sales tax of mobile
handset etc.
Development of Supplementary Industries like entertainment, distance education, e learning,
mobile health etc and development of regional content using local languages.
Technology Innovation in area of telecom and renewable energy.
There is a high possibility that the industry will continue to grow steadily for the next few years. Gartner
predicts that the teledensity will cross 60% by 2012 [6].
Figure 8: Project of population and teledensity
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Penetration (in %) 19.8 29.7 40 47.8 54.8 60.7
Population (in Millions) 1,135.60 1,151.60 1,167.50 1,183.30 1,199.00 1,214.50
Source: Gartner (April 2008)
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 28
Appendix 1: Department of Telecommunication Objectives 1. Policy, Licensing and Coordination matters relating to telegraphs, telephones, wireless, data, facsimile and telematic services and other like forms of communications. 2. International cooperation in matters connected with telecommunications including matters relating to all international bodies dealing with telecommunications such as International Telecommunication Union (ITU), its Radio Regulation Board (RRB), Radio Communication Sector (ITU-R), Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T), Development Sector (ITU-D), International Telecommunication Satellite Organization (INTELSAT), International Mobile Satellite Organization (INMARSAT), Asia Pacific Telecommunication (APT). 3. Promotion of standardization, research and development in telecommunications. 4. Promotion of private investment in Telecommunications. 5. Financial assistance for the furtherance of research and study in telecommunications technology and for building up adequately trained manpower for telecom programme, including- (a) assistance to institutions, assistance to scientific institutions and to universities for advanced scientific study and research; and (b) grant of scholarships to students in educational institutions and other forms of financial aid to individuals including those going abroad for studies in the field of telecommunications. 6. Procurement of stores and equipment required by the Department of Telecommunications 7. Telecom Commission. 8. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India. 9. Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal. 10. Administration of laws with respect to any of the matters specified in this list, namely:- a. The Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 (13 of 1885); b. The Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933 (17 of 1933); and c. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 (24 of 1997). 11. Indian Telephone Industries Limited. 12. Post disinvestment matters relating to M/s Hindustan Teleprinters Limited. 13. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited. 14. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited 15. Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited and Telecommunications Consultants (India) Limited. 16. All matters relating to Centre for Development of Telematics (C-DOT). 17. Residual work relating to the erstwhile Department of Telecom Services and Department of Telecom Operations, including matters relating to- a. cadre control functions of Group ‘A’ and other categories of personnel till their absorption in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited; b. administration and payment of terminal benefits. 18. Execution of works, purchase and acquisition of land debitable to the capital Budget pertaining to telecommunications.
Source: DoT website
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 29
Appendix 2: TRAI Goals and objectives
Increasing tele-density and access to telecommunications in the country at affordable prices
Making available telecommunication services which in terms of range, price and quality are
comparable to the best in the world
Providing a fair and transparent policy environment which promotes a level playing field and
facilitates fair competition
Establishing an interconnection regime that allows fair, transparent, prompt and equitable
interconnection
Re-balancing tariffs so that the objectives of affordability and operator viability are met in a
consistent manner
Protecting the interest of consumers and addressing general consumer concerns relating to
availability, pricing and quality of service and other matters
Monitoring the quality of service provided by the various operators
Providing a mechanism for funding of net cost areas/public telephones so that Universal Service
Obligations are discharged by telecom operators for spread of telecom facilities in remote and rural
areas
Preparing the grounds for smooth transition to an era of convergence of services and technologies
Promoting the growth of coverage of radio in India through commercial and non-commercial
channels
Increasing consumer choice in reception of TV channels and choosing the operator who would
provide television and other related services.
Source: TRAI Website
Pulak Piplani, PGPX 08-09 Page 30
References
1. TRAI Paper seeking suggestion on “Measures to Improve Telecom Penetration in Rural India –
The next 100 million subscribers”, accessed from TRAI website on 18-Feb-2009
2. Prof Jain and Prof Raghuram (2005), “Study on Accelerated Provisions of Rural
Telecommunication Services”
3. Prof Jain, “Accelerating Indian rural telecom services: Policy and Regulatory Approaches”
4. Prof Jain, Response to TRAI Paper seeking suggestions on “Measures to Improve Telecom
Penetration in Rural India – The next 100 million subscribers”, accessed from TRAI website on
18-Feb-2009
5. Ernest and Young (2006), “From Emerging To Surging: India Telecom 2010”
6. Quotes of Gartner report accessed from “http://www.domain-
b.com/industry/telecom/20080702_wireless.html” on 18-Feb-2009
7. Report by TRAI, “Indian Telecom Services: Performance Indicators April – June 2008”.
8. Ministry of Communication and Information Technology web site, http://www.moc.gov.in/
accessed on 18-Feb-2009
9. Department of Telecommunication web site, http://www.dot.gov.in/, accessed on 18-Feb-2009.
10. National Informatics Centre and Stanford University Report (2005), “Enabling ICT for rural India”
11. Prasoon Srivastava & Arpita Prem, “Green Tangle” accessed from
http://voicendata.ciol.com/content/bporbit/initiatives/109010106.asp, on 28-Feb-2009.
12. TRAI Recommendations(2005) on “Growth of telecom services in rural India, The way Forward”
13. NTP 99 Act, accessed from TRAI Website (http://www.trai.gov.in/TelecomPolicy_ntp99.asp) on
18-Feb-2009.
14. G Venkatesh and Ashwin Ramachandra, “Can 3G technologies benefit rural India”
15. “HSDPA: More effective and cost efficient use of precious bandwidth” (2005), Lucent
Technologies white paper.