Process Development for Permanganate Addition During Oxidative ...
Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
-
Upload
vanessa-olga -
Category
Documents
-
view
229 -
download
5
Transcript of Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
-
8/18/2019 Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
1/16
-
8/18/2019 Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
2/16
Chem126 Lab – Instrumental Analysis
components for ha&ing di%erent properties' most especially on maximum
absorbance di%erence. Since the absorbances are considered additi&e and
must ne&er react with each other in any way as shown in this formula)
A λ1= λ
1 A
1+ λ
1 A
2 (-
A λ2= λ
2 A
1+ λ
2 A
2 (!
where + the measured absorbance and 5 wa&elength
The maximum absorbances of each component should correspond to a
uni6ue wa&elength to pre&ent each resulting absorpti&ity cur&e from
o&erlapping and creating constant and identical results. The permanganate
solution absorbs at a maximum wa&elength around ,2/ nanometers (nm'
while dichromate absorbs at a maximum wa&elength of 72/ nm.
The molar absorpti&ity coe8cient' denoted by ε ' which is the only
constant &alue between measurements' is calculated from the linear
regression function obtained from the graph of concentration &ersus the
absorbance of the substances. Substituting this formula to (- and (! will
pro&ide the concentration of each component)
A=ε Cb (7
where " is the concentration of the sample and b is the path length of the
cu&ette.
The molar absorpti&ity coe8cient that was ta9en from the
standardization process of the permanganate and dichromate solutions is
used to determine the indi&idual absorbances of each component of the
mixture or binary system. The formula is)
A total350=ε350b Mn [ Mn ]+ε
350bCr [Cr ] (4
A total350=ε350b M n [ Mn ]+ε
350bCr [Cr ] (2
where :Mn; and :"r; are the concentrations of each component at the
speci3c wa&elength
age , of *+
-
8/18/2019 Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
3/16
Chem126 Lab – Instrumental Analysis
The determination of the concentrations of each component at
di%erent wa&elengths should show a signi3cant di%erence in the two
components' as long their maximum and minimum absorbance refrain from
o&erlapping.
MET-D./0
+ stoc9 solution of about /./- M solution of KMnO 4 was prepared and
standardized* while a solution of -.2 liters of /.!2 M
Separate &olumes of /.2' -./' 7.//' and 4.// milliliter (m= portions were
then pipetted from the standard KMnO4 solution and placed into separate
-// m= &olumetric >as9s. +nother empty >as9 was added to the set and
each >as9 was labeled respecti&ely from - to 2. ?ach solution was then
diluted to mar9 with the /.!2 M solution of
+bout /.22 to /.,/ grams of dried K !"r!O# reagent was weighed on ananalytical balance. This dry reagent was then transferred into a -// m=
&olumetric >as9 and diluted to the mar9 with distilled water. @sing a pipette'
!.//' 4.//' 0.//' and -/.// m= portions of the diluted K !"r!O# were placed
separately into -// m= &olumetric >as9s. +n empty >as9 was added to the
set and the >as9s were numbered from - to 2' respecti&ely. ?ach >as9 was
then diluted to the mar9 with the /.!2 M
The middle permanganate solution' the third one with intermediate
concentration' had its absorbance measured against a blan9 of pure /.!2
minimum reach of the spectrum the inter&als were reduced to e&ery 2 nm.
The absorbance and wa&elengths obtained from each permanganate solution
were plotted in a single graph. The process was repeated for the dichromate
solutions.
Two wa&elengths for the determination of the molar absorpti&ity were
selected from the data. The absorbances of each standard solution were
measured from each wa&elength' and were plotted against the concentration
of each primary ion present in each solution. The molar absorpti&ity was thencalculated from these two wa&elengths.
The absorbances of each standard solution were deri&ed from the
maximum absorption wa&elengths of each. The absorbances were then
plotted against the concentration of each primary ion at the two chosen
wa&elengths. This formed a calibration cur&e where the molar absorpti&ity
age 3 of *+
-
8/18/2019 Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
4/16
Chem126 Lab – Instrumental Analysis
was calculated for each ion. The path length was calculated from the b A
&alues for each wa&elength.
+ 9nown amount of KMnO4 and K !"r!O# solution was prepared in a -//
m= &olumetric >as9. The absorbance was measured for each of the two
pre&iously chosen wa&elengths. The concentration of each of the primaryions present in the solution was then calculated from the absorbances. The
calculated concentrations were then compared with the standard
concentrations obtained from the pre&ious processes.
RE').T' AND DI'()''IN
$eer A =ambertBs law is only &alid for a binary system in a set of
conditions. One of these conditions includes the independence of the
components of the sample analyzed from each other such that they are nonC
interfering* are homogenous* and' the incident radiation must bemonochromatic (D. SanEee&' !/-7. Thus' an instrument cannot di%erentiate
two species present in the sample absorbing speci3c wa&elengths. t can
only determine the total absorbance as shown in e6uations - and !. n this
experiment' an Fun9nownG mixture of K !"r!O# and MnO4 are analyzed by
measuring the absorbances of the solution at two determined wa&elengths.
Hour calibration cur&es were constructed each of which contains the ions
present in the sample.
The wa&elengths which correspond to the highest absorbances of eachstandard solution' K !"r!O# and KMnO4 were determined by the +bsorption
spectrum shown in Higure -. The highest absorbance in the KMnO4 standard
solution corresponds to a wa&elength of 47#.2 nm. The K!"r!O# standard
corresponds to a wa&elength of 2!, nm. These were used to record the
absorbances of the series of standards containing both of the components of
the sample.
age 1 of *+
-
8/18/2019 Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
5/16
Chem126 Lab – Instrumental Analysis
4// 42/ 2// 22/ ,// ,2/ #// #2//
/./2
/.-
/.-2
/.!
/.!2
/.7
/.72
otassium permanganate otassium dichromate
+bsorbance
Ia&elength (nm
&i
gure 1' Absorption Spectrum( )a!elength !s' Absorbance for ma*imum
absorbance determination
Higure ! and 7 shows the calibration cur&es obtained from measuring
the absorbances at 47#.2 nm. Higure ! is the plot of the absorbance against
the concentration of the permanganate ion. Higure 7 is the plot of the
absorbance against the concentration of the dichromate ion. "onse6uently'Higure 4 and 2 are the calibration cur&es obtained from measuring the
absorbances at the 2!, nm of the permanganate and dichromate ion'
respecti&ely. The information needed from these calibration cur&es is the
molar absorpti&ity which is the slope of the calibration cur&es. +ccording to
e6uation 7' if the path length is - cm (such that in this experiment' the
absorbance is linearly related to the concentration with the molar
absorpti&ity as its slope.
age 2 of *+
-
8/18/2019 Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
6/16
Chem126 Lab – Instrumental Analysis
/ 2 -/ -2 !/ !2 7/ 72 4/ 42 2/
/
/./-
/./-
/./!
/./!
/./7
/./7
/./4
/./4
f(x /x J /./-
D -
Asorance 4s" 55m Mn1at 6137"2
55m Mn1
Asorance
&igure 2' Calibration Cur!e( Absorbance !s' ppm $n+ at -./'0
age + of *+
-
8/18/2019 Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
7/16
Chem126 Lab – Instrumental Analysis
/ -// !// 7// 4// 2// ,//
/
/.-
/.!
/.7
/.4
/.2
/.,
/.#
/.0
/.L
f(x /x J /
D -
Asorance 4s" 55m (r,7at 6137"2
55m (r,7
Asorance
&igure .' Calibration Cur!e( Absorbance !s' ppm Cr 2+/ at -./'0
age 7 of *+
-
8/18/2019 Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
8/16
Chem126 Lab – Instrumental Analysis
/ 2 -/ -2 !/ !2 7/ 72 4/ 42 2/
/
/.!
/.4
/.,
/.0
-
-.!
f(x /./!x J /./-
D -
Asorance 4s" 55m Mn1at 62,+
55m Mn1
Asorance
&igure 2' Calibration Cur!e( Absorbance !s' ppm $n+ at -026
/ -// !// 7// 4// 2// ,///
/./-
/./!
/./7
/./4
/./2
/./,
f(x /x J /./-
D /.LL
Asorance 4s" 55m (r,7at 62,+
55m (r,7
Asorance
&igure 0' Calibration Cur!e( Absorbance !s' ppm Cr 2+/ at -026
age 8 of *+
-
8/18/2019 Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
9/16
Chem126 Lab – Instrumental Analysis
Table - summarizes the molar +bsorpti&ities in each calibration cur&es.
These were obtained by using the least s6uare methods in determining the
slope of a regression line (Seep +ppendix) "alculations.
Molar +bsorpti&ities (=mgC- cmC- Mn O4
−¿¿437.5
ℇ¿¿
0.000681127
MnO4
−¿¿526
ℇ¿¿
0.020134378
Cr2O72−¿¿437.5
ℇ¿
¿
0.001453089
Cr2O72−¿¿526ℇ¿¿
7.56909×10−5
Table -. Summary of the Molar +bsorpti&ities obtained in each calibration
cur&e.
These molar +bsorpti&ities are used to determine the concentration of
each ion present in the solution. +s mentioned' only the total absorbance in
each speci3c wa&elength can be detected in the instrument. ncorporatingthis concept to e6uation 7 and by measuring the absorbances of the sample
at the two selected wa&elengths' we may be able to get the concentration of
each ion in the sample as shown in e6uations 4 and 2. Manipulating this
system of e6uation' the concentration of the dichromate ion and
permanganate ion can be calculated as follows)
age 9 of *+
-
8/18/2019 Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
10/16
Chem126 Lab – Instrumental Analysis
526
ℇ Mn O4
−¿ ¿¿
Cr2O72−¿¿437.5¿ℇ¿
Mn O4
−¿¿437.5
−¿ℇ¿
Cr2
O7
2−¿¿526¿
ℇ¿¿
b¿ℇ
Mn O4
−¿ ¿526
¿ Mn O
4
−¿¿437.5
− A440¿
ℇ¿
A545¿
[C r2O7 ]=¿
(,
−¿
MnO4
¿
¿
2−¿
Cr2O
7
¿
¿
ℇ MnO4
−¿¿545
¿
Cr2O
7
2−¿¿545¿
ℇ¿
A545−¿
¿
(#
The sample that was analyzed in the experiment consists of 4ml
K !"r!O# and -ml KMnO4. Table ! shows the summary of the concentrations
obtained experimentally and theoretically. The percentage errors in each
determination were calculated. Minimal error resulted in the analysis. This
suggests an accurate laboratory handling and experimentation and also' a
successful experiment.
Ex5erimental Theoretical Percentage Error
age *: of *+
-
8/18/2019 Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
11/16
Chem126 Lab – Instrumental Analysis
−¿
MnO4
¿ 12.06 ppm 11.88 p pm 1.50
2−¿Cr
2O
7
¿ 227.64 ppm 227.24 ppm 0.18
Table !. Summary of the analysis of the un9nown sample.
(N(.)'IN
Simultaneous determination of the concentration of a sample
composed of two or more components can be done using spectroscopic
measurements. $y using a series of standards of solution present in the
sample' four calibration cur&es were obtained. The slope of these calibration
cur&es were calculated to the molar absorpti&ity. These &alues were used to
calculate for the concentration of the two ions present in the sample. The
sample composed of 4ml K !"r!O# and -ml KMnO4 was analyzed. Thespectroscopic measurements determined the concentration of the
dichromate and permanganate ion to be !!#.,4 ppm and -!., ppm'
respecti&ely. The theoretical &alues for these concentrations were calculated
in order to compare the accuracy of the results of the analysis. + percentage
error of -.2/1 and /.-01 resulted from the determination of the
permanganate and dichromate concentrations. These minimal &alues
indicate accuracy in the analysis and therefore yield no signi3cant di%erence
between the experimental and theoretical &alues.
.ITERAT)RE (ITED
-
8/18/2019 Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
12/16
Chem126 Lab – Instrumental Analysis
chemistry.niser.ac.inPlabhandoutsP"!4-C?xp0.pdf. Nate +ccessed)
March -L' !/-,.
?xperiment 0) Simultaneous Spectrophotometric Netermination. Nepartment
of "hemistry' "ollege of Science' Sultan Uaboos @ni&ersity' Sulatanat of
Oman. +pril 7/' !/--. Detrie&ed from)www.eoman.almdares.netPupP772#,P-7/,4/,0-,.doc . Nate +ccessed)
March -L' !/-,.
-
8/18/2019 Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
13/16
Chem126 Lab – Instrumental Analysis
1 4#.2-00L!74 /./70 /.L#
able ' Summary of Data using the "otassium $anganese Standards
able 0' Data for the standardi3ation of "otassium $anganese stoc4 solution
"+="@=+TORS
Least S5uares $ethod o determine molar absorpti!ity7
+bsorbance &s. ppm MnO4 at 547#.2 (Hig. !
S xx= Σ x2− ( Σx )
2
n =3704.60529− (100.9776462)
2
4=1155.484031
S xy= Σxy−( ΣxΣy )
❑
n =3.059028695−
[ (100.9776462) (0.09 ) ]❑
4=0.787031654
MnO4
−¿¿437.5
=m=S xy
S xx=
0.787031654
1155.484031=0.000681127
ℇ¿¿
+bsorbance &s. ppm MnO4 at 52!, (Hig. 7
S xx= Σ x2−
( Σx )2
n =3704.60529−
(100.9776462)2
4=1155.484031
age *3 of *+
Trial
Initial Volume
=m.>
)se# Volume
=m.>
* 7#.#L /./ 7#.#L
, 7-.-L -./ 7/.-L
3 4!.// --.L/ 7/.-
-
8/18/2019 Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
14/16
Chem126 Lab – Instrumental Analysis
S xy= Σxy−( ΣxΣy )
❑
n =75.89955079−
[ (100.9776462) (2.085 ) ]4
=23.2649527
MnO4−¿¿526
=m=S xy
S xx= 23.2649527
1155.484031=0.020134378
ℇ¿¿
+bsorbance &s. ppm "r!O# at 547#.2 (Hig. 4
S xx= Σ x2−
( Σx )2
n =593837.2024−
(1363.44 )2
4=129095.044
S xy= Σxy−( ΣxΣy )
❑
n =865.89802−[ (1363.44 ) (1.99 ) ]
❑
4 =187.58662
Cr2O
7
2−¿¿437.5
=m=S xy
S xx=
187.58662
129095.044=0.001453089
ℇ¿¿
+bsorbance &s. ppm "r!O# at 52!, (Hig. 2
S xy= Σxy−( ΣxΣy )
❑
n =60.2186−
[ (1363.44 ) (0.148) ]❑
4=9.77132
Cr2O
7
2−¿¿526=m=
S xy
S xx=
9.77132
129095.044=7.56909×10
−5
ℇ¿¿
$olarity of KMnO
4
Trial -)0.1264g Na
2C
2O
4
0.03779 L KMn O4×
1mol Na2
C 2
O4
133.96 g Na2 C 2 O4×
2mol KMn O4
5mol Na2 C 2 O4=0.00998746 M KMn O
4
age *1 of *+
-
8/18/2019 Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
15/16
Chem126 Lab – Instrumental Analysis
Trial !)0.1011g Na
2C
2O
4
0.03019 L KMnO 4×
1mol Na2
C 2
O4
133.96g Na2 C 2 O4×
2mol KMn O4
5mol Na2C 2O4=0.009999376 M KMn O
4
Trial 7)
0.1006g Na2
C 2
O4
0.03010 L KMn O4×
1mol Na2
C 2
O4
133.96g Na2 C 2 O4×
2mol KMnO4
5mol Na2C 2O4=0.009979674 M KMn O
4
M KMnO4(average )=
0.00998746 M +0.009999376 M +0.009979674 M 3
=0.009988836 M
Concentration of Standards
ppm Mn O4=
0.009988836mol KMn O4
1 L ×
1mol MnO4
1mol KMn O4×118.93g Mn O
4
1mol MnO4× 1000mg
1g =1187.972309 pp
ppmCr2O
7=
0.5681gK 2Cr
2O
7
0.1 L ×
1000mg
1g =5681 ppmCr
2O
7
"omposition of un9nown using the calibration cur&es
526
ℇ Mn O4
−¿ ¿¿
Cr2O72−¿¿437.5¿ℇ¿
Mn O4−¿
¿437.5−¿ℇ¿
Cr2
O7
2−¿¿526¿
ℇ¿¿
b¿ℇ
Mn O4
−¿ ¿526
¿ Mn O
4
−¿¿437.5
− A440¿
ℇ¿
A545¿
[C r2O7 ]=¿
[Cr2O7 ]= 0.260 (0.00068113)−0.339 (0.020134378 )
(7.56909×10−5 ) (0.00068113)−(0.00145309 ) (0.020134378 )=227.64 ppm
age *2 of *+
-
8/18/2019 Analysis of Permanganate – Dichromate Mixture
16/16
Chem126 Lab – Instrumental Analysis
−¿ Mn O
4
¿
¿2−¿
Cr2
O7
¿
¿
ℇ Mn O4
−¿ ¿545
=0.260−(7.56909×10−5) (227.64 ppm )
0.020134378=12.06 ppm
¿Cr
2O
7
2−¿¿545¿
ℇ¿
A545−¿¿
heoretical composition of un4no8n
[C r2 O7 ]=5681 ppmCr2O7 × 4ml
100ml=227.24 pp m
−¿ Mn O
4
¿
¿¿
"ercentage 9rror
Hor [C r2 O7 ] ' %Error=227.64 ppm−227.24 ppm
227.24 ppm =0.18
Hor
−¿ Mn O
4
¿
¿¿
%Error=12.06 ppm−11.88 pp m
11.88 pp m =1.50
age *+ of *+