AN EXAMPLE TWS 1

An Example of a Teacher Work Sample:

A Unit on Perimeter and Area for 6th Grade Advanced Math

Matthew R. Lavery

University of Central Florida

Comment [ML1]: This example of a TWS has been developed to demonstrate the Proficient level for all seven components. Comments have been

added to show exactly how each indicator at the

Proficient level has been met.

AN EXAMPLE TWS 2

Contextual Factors

This unit was developed for a sixth grade Advanced Math class on block scheduling at a

large, diverse middle school in central Florida. The curriculum for the Advanced Math course is

designed for students that perform at or above grade level in math. This school also offers sixth

grade Honors Pre-Algebra I, the first half of a two-year program designed to prepare students to

take Algebra I in the eighth grade. Most students that are high-achieving in math (i.e., that score

a 5 or a high 4) are placed in this other course. Thus, the Advanced Math courses contain

students who scored at achievement levels 3 and 4 on the fifth grade math FCAT. My

supervising teacher teaches three Advanced Math sections, one section of Honors Pre-Algebra I,

and two remedial math classes for students who have not passed the FCAT. This TWS will

include the students for the three Advanced Math classes, since these classes will all receive the

same pre and post assessment.

The school serves about 1400 students from a diverse metropolitan area. The school

serves a semi-urban area where many residents work in the tourist industry, or in a variety of

related businesses providing goods and services. In the school, 51.7% of the students identify

themselves as Hispanic; 27.4% as White, Non-Hispanic; 12.1% as Black, Non-Hispanic; 2.8% as

Asian or Pacific Islander; 0.4% as Native American, and 5.6% as multiracial. At this school, 20.8%

of the students are identified as ELLs, 13.6% of the students receive ESE services for a disability,

and 67.9% of the students qualify for free or reduced price lunch.

My classes are very similar to the demographics of the school. Based on the data

available to the teacher through the grade book system, of the 65 students in these three classes,

32 are identified as Hispanic, 19 as White or Caucasian, 10 as Black or African-American, and 4

Comment [ML2]: Indicator P1 - The Contextual Factors (CF) component doesnt have any names in

it. I need to make sure that I dont use any names in the rest of the components as I develop them.

Comment [ML3]: The information in this first paragraph is necessary to explain for which kind of

class your TWS unit was prepared. It is described in the guidelines and directions in your syllabus.

Comment [ML4]: Indicator P3 Include the size of the school.

Comment [ML5]: Indicator P2 The description of the area need only give a sense of

whether the area is Urban, Suburban, Rural, or mixed. The added detail in this example is helpful,

but not necessary.

Comment [ML6]: Indicator P3 This information can often be found on school or district web sites, or you can pull it from the various school

accountability reports available at

http://schoolgrades.fldoe.org/.

http://schoolgrades.fldoe.org/

AN EXAMPLE TWS 3

as Asian. Nine of these students are identified as ELLs currently receiving ESOL services, while

4 students receive ESE services, and one is in tier three of the Response to Intervention (RtI)

process. The ELLs in these classes all function at intermediate or advanced levels of English

language proficiency. Spanish is the first language for 6 of these ELLs, while two students were

raised speaking Haitian Creole, and one student originally spoke Vietnamese.

The IEPs of the four students receiving ESE services indicate the nature of their

disabilities. Three students have language-related specific learning disabilities that hinder their

reading comprehension and writing abilities. One has a mild Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)

that affects his interaction with others and may cause him to feel overwhelmed and

overstimulated in noisy or chaotic situations. The student in RtI is under evaluation for a

suspected emotional behavioral disorder.

My supervising teachers classroom is a portable classroom. The desks are arranged in

groups of four or five, with a projector and space for the teachers laptop computer in the center

of the groups. Because this class is held in a portable, there is no wireless network to provide

internet access to the computer that is connected to the projector. The room also has no

computers for student use, but there are two separate work stations with two desks each and one

desk by itself, where students can work in pairs or individually. There are also a variety of

mathematics manipulatives in the room, and more available from the math department workroom.

The arrangement of the desks and the available manipulatives will allow me to use some

hands-on learning activities. With the projector and laptop always in the room, and with my

supervising teachers wireless presentation remote, it should also be relatively easy for me to use

presentations to give instructions, show visualizations of concepts. I will not be able to use any

Comment [ML7]: Indicator P4 Describe your class the way you described the school. How does it compare? Work with your supervising teacher to

find access to this information.

Comment [ML8]: Indicator P5 Describe the unique educational needs of individual learners in your class. The more details you can give in this part,

the better.

Comment [ML9]: Indicator P6 Describe the physical characteristics of the classroom, including technology. Diagrams or photos could also be

included if you like. Just make sure that photos dont have any names or faces in them.

AN EXAMPLE TWS 4

interactive online resources, though. The contextual factors of the class also suggest that I should

offer images, visualizations, and non-linguistic representations of concepts whenever possible

because of the language-related disabilities and ELLs in the classroom.

Comment [ML10]: Indicator P7 This is the first of two required instructional implications. This

implication relates to contextual factors covered under Indicator P6.

Comment [ML11]: Indicator P7 The second instructional implication address the contextual factors covered by Indicator P5. The different

indicators on the rubric can help you think about the

different contextual factors that may affect your design for instruction.

AN EXAMPLE TWS 5

Learning Goals

The goals for this unit are based on the Next Generation Sunshine State Standards for

sixth grade that relate to perimeter and area. All of the students in these classes performed at or

above grade level on last years FCAT, so these standards should be appropriate for this group of

students. Since the FCAT typically uses word problems, I will also use word problems in my

classroom activities and assessments. In order to support the ELLs in the class, I will include

clearly labeled visual aids or diagrams for each word problem. I may also have to support the

students with language impairments and teach them specific strategies to deal with the word

problems.

The specific learning goals for this unit are as follows:

1. The student will understand and be able to explain the concept of , list common

estimates of (3.14 and 22/7), and use these values to estimate and calculate the

circumference and the area of circles (Next Generation Sunshine State Standards:

MA.6.G.4.1).

2. The student will analyze composite, complex, irregular two-dimensional figures,

including non-rectangular (such as triangular and/or semicircular) parts to develop

methods to calculate the perimeter and area of those figures and evaluate the methods

developed by others (Next Generation Sunshine State Standards: MA.6.G.4.2).

3. The student will develop methods to find a missing dimension of a plane figure given

its area and some of the dimensions, and assess the accuracy of their methods and the

methods of others (Next Generation Sunshine State Standards: MA.6.G.4.3).

Comment [ML12]: Browse through the Next Generation Sunshine State Standards at

http://www.floridastandards.org/Standards/FLStandardSearch.aspx.

Comment [ML13]: Indicator P4: I make sure to relate how these learning goals are appropriate to my

specific students. I wont know if my goals are too easy or too tough until I administer my pre-

assessment, but I have plenty of data in the

Contextual Factors component to make a good estimate. Then, as I think about my plan, Im going

to discuss it with the one person that knows my

students the best, my cooperating teacher.

Comment [ML14]: Indicator P1: I have the right number of learning goals, but thats not quite

enough. My learning goals need to be measurable,

too. Each of my goals contains something that I can evaluate (e.g., they must explain the concept of ,

they can list or identify estimates of to show that

they know them, and use those values to calculate perimeter and area). If theres a way that I can assess

the learning goal and determine a students percent

accuracy, then its measurable.

Comment [ML15]: Notice that this learning goal contains several sub-skills. This is a goal for my unit,

but I am not going to use this language for my lesson objectives. I may have one objective for students to

describe the concept of , another for them to list or

identify common estimates of , another to estimate circumference, another to calculate circumference,

another to estimate area, and one to calculate area.

This one goal covers six lesson objectives.

Comment [ML16]: Indicator P3: Notice that this is not just the standard that I have copied and

pasted into my TWS. I modified it to make the

language more measurable and reflect what I plan to do.

Comment [ML17]: Indicator P5: This goal incorporates higher-order thinking skills as indicated

by the verbs used (analyze figures, develop methods, and evaluate)

http://www.floridastandards.org/Standards/FLStandardSearch.aspxhttp://www.floridastandards.org/Standards/FLStandardSearch.aspx

AN EXAMPLE TWS 6

For all of these goals, I will consider that a student has mastered the goal when she or he

consistently demonstrates 80% accuracy on exercises, skills, and calculations related to that goal.

Although each goal has several sub-skills that may be assessed separately, my pre and post-

assessments and any other assessment that is supposed to determine mastery will assess all parts

of the goal as much as possible. These goals will also be assessed by applying the knowledge and

skills taught as realistically as possible. Comment [ML18]: Indicator P2: This is a very clear description of what constitutes mastery on the learning goals. In this example of a TWS, mastery is

holistic, applied, and 80% accurate. When I enter my

pre/post assessment scores into the TWS GraphMaker, my Required Mastery Scores for each

learning goal will be 80% of the points available for

that learning goal, rounded up.

Indicator P5: The verbs used in the learning goals

above indicate higher-order thinking skills. This unit will definitely require my students to use multiple

steps and complex thinking. This matches the

standards, as the state has identified these benchmarks as moderate in complexity. For

Learning Goal 1, see

http://www.floridastandards.org/Standards/PublicPreviewBenchmark616.aspx, for Learning Goal 2, see

http://www.floridastandards.org/Standards/PublicPre

viewBenchmark617.aspx, for Learning Goal 3, see http://www.floridastandards.org/Standards/PublicPre

viewBenchmark618.aspx. For a description of the

different levels of cognitive complexity associated with the math standards, see

http://floridastandards.org/textonly.aspx?ContentID=

21&UrlPath=/page21.aspx.

http://www.floridastandards.org/Standards/PublicPreviewBenchmark616.aspxhttp://www.floridastandards.org/Standards/PublicPreviewBenchmark616.aspxhttp://www.floridastandards.org/Standards/PublicPreviewBenchmark617.aspxhttp://www.floridastandards.org/Standards/PublicPreviewBenchmark617.aspxhttp://www.floridastandards.org/Standards/PublicPreviewBenchmark618.aspxhttp://www.floridastandards.org/Standards/PublicPreviewBenchmark618.aspxhttp://floridastandards.org/textonly.aspx?ContentID=21&UrlPath=/page21.aspxhttp://floridastandards.org/textonly.aspx?ContentID=21&UrlPath=/page21.aspx

AN EXAMPLE TWS 7

Assessment Plan

My supervising teacher uses mini quizzes, with three or four questions, about once per

week to assess the students on material they have studied recently and as part of their final grade.

I will continue to use this system, since these students are accustomed to it, but I will also use

informal questioning and some of the units learning activities to help me assess the students

understanding of the material.

Class Meetings: Description of Assessment: Learning Goals Assessed:

Week before unit Pre-assessment (included at end of TWS) 1, 2, 3

Day 2 Finding Pi activity 1

Day 3 Mini Quiz 1 (simple figures) 1, 2

Day 4 Campus Geometry 1, 2

Day 5 Mini Quiz 2 (composite figures & missing dimensions) 2, 3

Day 5 Perimeter & Area Unit Practice 1, 2, 3

Day 6 Post-assessment (included at end of TWS) 1, 2, 3

In order to properly accommodate for ELLs in this classroom I will be teaching specific

academic vocabulary using simple definitions paired with non-linguistic representations of the

terms. These instructional techniques will not assist these students on the pre-assessment,

however. I will make sure to provide a copy of my Pre/Post assessment to the ESOL Compliance

Specialist for help in translating key portions of the instructions and of items into the native

languages of my ELLs. I plan to have these translated portions available to assist these students,

if needed. I will also allow all students to ask me to read parts of the assessment for them. This

will allow me to simply read the assessment as written for any student that does not require

accommodation, and to paraphrase or explain further for those students that are having trouble

with the language. I also plan to allow my ELL students and my students with language related

Comment [ML19]: Indicator P3: The Assessment Plan discusses both formal and informal

methods of assessment that have been clearly planned in advance. The table details the plan pretty

effectively.

Comment [ML20]: Indicator P5: The overall Assessment Plan is linked to the learning goals to show that I have consciously linked my assessment

activities to specific learning goals.

AN EXAMPLE TWS 8

disabilities to explain their answers orally, as needed. The student with ASD and the student in

RtI also get extended time and/or an alternate assessment location on request.

Comment [ML21]: Indicator P4: Assessment accommodations for all unique learners identified in the Contextual Factors component are discussed in

the Assessment Plan.

Perimeter & Area Unit Assessment Student Name: Answer Key

Block: Date:

Answer the questions below. Use the blank space or the back of this sheet to write out any work that

you do. Be sure to put your final answer in the blank provided.

The Radigans are putting tile in their family room, pictured to the right. They want to have enough tile to cover the floor, and also put a tile border all the way around the room on the walls.

1) How many square feet of tile will the Radigans need to cover the family room floor? LG2 192 ft

2

2) What length of tile border will the Radigans need to go on the walls around the entire room?

LG2 60 ft

3) What is the area of the figure to the left? LG2 42.85 cm2

4) Rebecca wants to put up a fence around an area in her yard for Buffy, her dog. She wants Buffy's play area to be just as long as the side of her house, which is 18 ft long. If Rebecca only has 50 feet of fence, how wide can she make Buffy's play area?

LG3 7 ft

5) Luis has some cylindrical pots to put his plants in that are 12 inches in diameter. He thinks they are too plain the way they are. He decides to decorate them by putting ribbon around them, but he can only order ribbon by a number of whole feet in length. How long must he order each piece of ribbon to go all the way around one pot?

LG1 4 ft

6) What decimal value can you use for ? LG1 3.14 7) What fraction can you use for ? LG1

8) In the space below, describe what is and what it is used for. LG1

Ratio of circumference to diameter (distance across a circle to distance around a circle) used to calculate the circumference and area of circles

NOTE: This example of a TWS only shows one page worth of assessment items. This unit

assessment would actually have 30 total questions, with ten for each learning goal.

10 cm

4 cm

5 cm

Buffys

Play Area

12 in

18 ft

12 ft

18 ft

4 ft

6 ft

Comment [ML22]: Indicator P1: I created this pre/post assessment myself. When I am hired for my

first teaching job, I will have lots of resources that I can use for student assessment. For the TWS, I need

to create my own assessments because thats

something the state expects new teachers to be able to do before they get certified. I may be able to look

at the teacher resources that come with my curriculum or textbook to give me ideas, but I have

to design my own assessments.

Indicator P2: By using the same assessment, for my

Pre/Post Assessment, the pre- and post-assessment

scores can be reliably compared to show student growth. My assessments dont have to be identical,

but they can be. I can also add additional items to my

Post-Assessment, but only compare the items that appear on both assessments, or I can modify my

assessments to create a Pre-Assessment form and a

Post-Assessment form that will help me demonstrate exemplary Indicator E2.

Comment [ML23]: Indicator P6: Items like this one show that my assessment matches the cognitive

complexity of my learning goals.

Comment [ML24]: Indicator P5: Each assessment item is linked to a specific learning goal.

Comment [ML25]: Indicator P6: Items like this one show that my assessment matches the cognitive

complexity of my learning goals.

Comment [ML26]: Indicator P6: Items like this one show that my assessment matches the cognitive

complexity of my learning goals.

AN EXAMPLE TWS 10

Design for Instruction

The students in my classes scored an average 31.2% on the pre-assessment and no

student demonstrated mastery of any of the learning goals. This tells me that my students have

some familiarity with the concepts that I plan to teach them, but that my learning goals are not

too easy for them. Clearly, my students should not show mastery of learning goals that havent

been taught to them, but the fact they were able to show some correct understanding of the

content means that I havent made my unit too difficult either. I want to avoid causing frustration

for my students since, especially with math, such frustration might cause them to shut down and

become demotivated.

The pre-assessment also showed me that many of these students know how to find the

perimeter and area of simple shapes when the information that they need is given to them in a

simple diagram. The kinds of questions that were most frequently answered correctly required

one-step calculations that used clearly labeled diagrams of simple geometric shapes that asked

for either the perimeter or area. Students had a much tougher time applying these skills in more

complex problems. If the question used a complex shape, if they needed to use multiple steps and

formulas, or if the information they needed was in a word problem, students were much more

likely to get it wrong.

These results told me that I didnt need to spend too much time teaching them what

perimeter and area are, but that I really needed to teach them how to use that knowledge in more

complex ways. I also need to teach these students how to approach word problems better. I

always planned to use the first day to introduce vocabulary, formulas, and practice some simple

problems. After seeing my pre-assessment results, though, I think will spend more time on all the

different ways that perimeter and area can be described in word problems. Ill also spend some

Comment [ML27]: Indicator P2: This component reports aggregate results of the pre-

assessment. The added detail and discussion that follows indicates that I didnt just report the stuff

that the TWS GraphMaker shows me automatically,

but that I analyzed the results and thought through what the results indicate about my students and the

instruction that they need.

AN EXAMPLE TWS 11

time teaching students specific strategies for chopping up composite shapes into more

manageable pieces.

The unit will follow the general timeline below. For more detail, I have attached my

lesson plans (NOTE: This example of a TWS does not have detailed lesson plans attached).

Day 1: Unit Introduction (all LGs) vocabulary, formulas, & word problem

strategies

Day 2: Finding and Applying Pi (LG1) an activity calculating pi in small groups

by wrapping string around cylindrical objects to measure their circumference, and

another activity cutting up construction paper circles and arranging the pieces in a

parallelogram to find its area

Day 3: Mini Quiz 1 (LG1 & LG2), Composite Shapes (LG2), & Missing

Measures (LG3) strategies and practice breaking complex, composite shapes

into smaller ones to find perimeter and area, and using formulas in reverse to find

missing measurements

Day 4: Campus Geometry (LG1 & LG2) activity with a partner using meter

sticks to measure designated parts of the campus or the school building

Day 5: Mini Quiz 2 (LG2 & LG3) and Unit Review and Practice (all LGs)

review and individual practice on all learning goals and concepts

Day 6: Unit Post-assessment (all LGs)

Comment [ML28]: Indicator P1: All lesson plans for your TWS unit must be submitted to

LiveText with your final TWS, and will be previewed by your coordinator when s/he previews

this component.

Your formal lesson plans fulfill several different

requirements, just like the plans that your

supervising teacher has to write. Even though you may have already discussed these elements in

another part of your TWS, a teachers lesson plans

are a legal document and must contain goals and/or objectives, linked standards, materials, learning

activities and procedures, accommodations for

individual learning needs, and how student learning will be assessed.

You do not need to place these lesson plans inside your TWS Word document, though. There is a

separate spot where you can upload them to

LiveText as part of your final submission.

For detailed instructions on how to upload your

TWS to LiveText, visit the TWS web site at http://education.ucf.edu/clinicalexp/TWS.cfm.

Indicator P4:Your attached lesson plans are the

primary source for demonstrating that you have met

this indicator. Your learning activities must be appropriate for your learners. You may also discuss

this appropriateness briefly in the text of this

component.

Indicator P5: Your attached lesson plans are the

primary source for demonstrating that you have met this indicator. Your bullet list of daily activities will

indicate active learning and higher-order thinking,

but your plans will show that more clearly.

Indicator P6: Both your attached lesson plans and

your bullet list summary will indicate the variety of learning activities and modes of instruction.

Indicator P7: Your attached lesson plans are the primary source for demonstrating that you have met

this indicator. You should speak to the general nature of your accommodations in the text of this

component, but specific ESOL and ESE

accommodations are legally required on lesson plans for virtually all teachers in the nation.

Indicator P8: The bullet list summary will indicate that the learning activities are arranged in a logical

sequence that builds toward student mastery of the

learning goals, and your attached lesson plans will confirm it.

Indicator P9: Both your attached lesson plans and your TWS observation will be used to demonstrate

that the content of your unit is being represented

accurately.

Comment [ML29]: Indicator P3: All learning activities are explicitly linked to my learning goals.

http://education.ucf.edu/clinicalexp/TWS.cfm

AN EXAMPLE TWS 12

Instructional Decision Making

Example One: The first example of a time that I had to adjust my instructional plan

came when I had the students do the Applying Pi activity. When I did this exercises with my first

block class, the students seemed to have a really hard time with the instructions. When I asked

them to cut up the construction paper circles and arrange them with the points of each wedge in

alternating directions to make something that looks sort of like a parallelogram, they were clearly

confused. The written directions had a few drawings that I thought were pretty clear, but they

were not as clear as I had hoped. During first block, several groups of students seemed confused

and started to get frustrated. The ELLs in this class especially seemed to have difficulty with the

written directions, even though the EELs were in groups with native English speakers as well. It

seemed that the students confusion and frustration started to get them agitated. I feared that the

noise level and chaos may start to over stimulate and overwhelm the student with ASD.

I stopped the class as soon as I realized the confusion so that I could demonstrate the

activity and clarify the directions. As I showed them what they needed to do step by step, I began

to hear students saying things like, Ooohh, and I get it. During the planning period that

comes right after this class, I added some additional slides to my instructions that I use at the

beginning of class, and pre-cut a series of construction paper circles to illustrate each step. This

made the instructions much more clear for my third and fourth block classes, and helped the

students get more out of the activity. Because the instructions were better, the students needed

less time to complete the activities. This left more time for us to compare everyones results and

process through the activity to help build their understanding of using to find a circles

perimeter and area.

Comment [ML30]: Indicator P1: In this component I must describe two separate occasions

when my ongoing assessment of student learning and/or my observation of student responses and

behavior in the class indicate to me that I have to change my plans. Both of my examples describe the

kinds of situations that I remember from my first

year teaching math. As a result, they describe times when I made changes to my plan that affected the

entire class. You may also choose to describe a time

when you made changes that affect one student or a small group of students based on your interaction

with and assessment of those particular students.

Good teachers make instructional decisions constantly, so you should have many examples to

choose from. These examples do not have to be

based on formal assessments of the whole class, but must indicate that you are paying attention to

indications of student understanding.

Comment [ML31]: Indicator P2: This is a great example of informal assessment. I didnt have to let

the students complete the assignment and grade their papers to see that my plan wasnt working properly.

Comment [ML32]: Indicator P4: I have explained my rationale for making the change I

describe.

Comment [ML33]: Indicator P3: The Applying Pi activity is one of the primary learning activities

that supports LG1. By making sure that I support my students ability to complete the activity, this

instructional decision is consistent with and supports

the stated learning goal.

Comment [ML34]: Indicator P5: I have described the result of my instructional decision. The

kind of detail that I have given here shows that Im

really reflecting on my instructional technique, student learning, and classroom management. This

example of instructional decision making would put

me a long way towards demonstrating exemplary Indicator E1, too.

AN EXAMPLE TWS 13

Example Two: The second time that I needed to adjust my plan came when I taught the

students how to find the missing dimensions of a shape given its perimeter or area, and some of

the other dimensions. My supervising teacher told me to think of each block as two class periods

that happen back to back. I followed this advice, and planned to use day 3 to teach two lessons;

one on finding the perimeter and area of composite shapes, and the other on finding the missing

dimensions of a shape when given some of its dimensions and the area or perimeter. Each lesson

was supposed to have a short assignment that the students would begin to work on in class and

finish for homework. I used the time while students worked on the practice exercises in class to

circulate around the room and check their understanding of each concept.

The students seemed to understand the lesson on composite shapes well, and their

performance on the practice exercises confirmed that. Unfortunately, the students performed

poorly on the Missing Measures practice exercises. The problem seemed to come from the

algebraic thinking required for students to use the formula for the perimeter and area to find one

of the other values. It wasnt natural for them to use the formula backwards like I suggested.

They also seemed to have a hard time using division to reverse multiplication, and using

subtraction to reverse addition. The practice exercises confirmed that they were having a hard

time with it.

As I discussed the lesson with my supervising teacher later that day, I suggested that I

should delay the unit review and post-assessment, and include another lesson that focuses on the

algebraic thinking required to solve these kinds of problems. She agreed. I planned a lesson for

the first part of the block that taught students how to reverse mathematical operations, and a

lesson for the second part of the block that applied those skills more naturally to the kinds of

problems that go with Learning Goal 3. This was the reinforcement that many of these students

Comment [ML35]: Indicator P2: This example of instructional decision making relies on a more formal assessment method. While I circulated around

the room, I could tell that the students were having

difficulty, but grading the assignment confirmed it for me and showed me how much difficulty the

students had.

Comment [ML36]: Indicator P4: This passage indicates that Im reflecting on what may cause the problem and what the results Im seeing indicate

about student learning.

Comment [ML37]: Indicator P3: This instructional decision is directly linked to one of the

learning goals.

AN EXAMPLE TWS 14

needed, and the students did much better with the Missing Measures exercises after that. I gave

the students the opportunity to redo and resubmit the Missing Measures assignment with no

penalty to their grade. Several of the students took the opportunity, and all of the ones that turned

in the assignment again completed it at or above the mastery level of 80%. Comment [ML38]: Indicator P5: I have described the result of my instructional modification and given details and data that support my decision.

AN EXAMPLE TWS 15

Analysis of Student Learning

The pre and post assessment results definitely show that my students increased their

understanding of perimeter and area. The class scored an average 79.9% on the post-assessment,

which was an increase of 48.7 points from the average pre-assessment score of 31.2%. Individual

students increased their scores by anywhere from 23 points to 70 points. The graphs on the next

pages show the individual student scores on the pre/post assessment for each student in the three

classes in which I taught this unit.

23

.3%

40

.0%

43

.3%

23

.3%

26

.7%

46

.7%

53

.3%

33

.3%

20

.0%

40

.0%

33

.3%

33

.3%

40

.0%

30

.0%

43

.3%

36

.7%

33

.3%

26

.7%

36

.7%

30

.0%

23

.3%

26

.7%

46

.7%

66

.7%

66

.7%

66

.7%

70

.0%

73

.3%

73

.3%

73

.3%

76

.7%

76

.7%

80

.0%

80

.0%

80

.0%

83

.3%

83

.3%

83

.3%

83

.3%

90

.0%

90

.0%

90

.0%

93

.3%

93

.3%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

S14

S11

S12

S07

S04

S08

S18

S02

S10

S22

S01

S03

S21

S13

S09

S19

S06

S17

S20

S05

S16

S15

Pre/Post Assessment Scores for Block 1

Pre % Post %

Comment [ML39]: Indicator P1: The pre and post assessment measures must be submitted with

your final TWS in LiveText. You do not need to include them in the Word document that contains

your TWS, though. You may upload them separately into LiveText and submit them with your final

assignment. I included a page of the pre/post

assessment measure for this example TWS in the Assessment Plan component, since that is the step at

which you must develop your assessments.

Indicator P8: This indicator applies to the whole

Analysis of Student Learning component. It is

possible to crunch some numbers, make some graphs, and not make meaningful and reasonable

conclusions. As long as you do more than simply go

through the motions, though, you should be able to meet this indicator.

Comment [ML40]: Indicator P3: Somewhere close to the beginning of this component, I need to

state the average pre and post assessment score for all the students I taught in simple language.

Indicator P9: This statement is the first of many in this component that provides evidence of my impact

on student learning. As long as my students tend to

do better on the post-assessment than they did on the pre-assessment, and show some growth, You will

demonstrate that you have had an impact. You do

not need to demonstrate that you are an amazing teacher that makes a huge impact on student learning

with every single lesson. Follow the TWS process,

pay attention to evidence of student learning, and the numbers will show that you had an impact.

Comment [ML41]: Indicator P4: Simply pasting the graphs into Word isnt sufficient for this

component. I also need to interpret the graphs and highlight the important bits in the text of the

component. This sentence is only the first example

of this kind of summary and explanation. The rest of the component adds clarity to my graphs.

Comment [ML42]: Indicator P2: I have included the required graphs that show pre and post assessment results for individual students in my

classes. Because this example TWS reports more

than 40 students, and because those students are naturally grouped into three different classes, I have

included three separate graphs that display all of the

students.

I used the TWS GraphMaker to enter my data and

create my graphs. The graphs that I need were automatically created for me, and then I copied and

pasted them into Word. After I pasted the graphs in

Word, I changed the titles of each graph and made the data labels bold for the two students that I have

specifically mentioned in the text of my TWS. This

will make the data for these students easier for my readers to find.

The GraphMaker is designed to make your life easier by generating the graphs you need automatically.

You may generate your graphs using another tool if

you like, but you must sill enter all of your student learning data into the GraphMaker and upload it into

LiveText with your final TWS.

AN EXAMPLE TWS 16

23

.3%

23

.3%

26

.7%

26

.7%

36

.7%

36

.7%

33

.3%

33

.3%

16

.7%

40

.0%

30

.0%

43

.3%

26

.7%

33

.3%

30

.0%

26

.7%

23

.3%

36

.7%

23

.3%

33

.3%

43

.3%

70

.0%

70

.0%

70

.0%

76

.7%

80

.0%

80

.0%

80

.0%

80

.0%

83

.3%

83

.3%

83

.3%

83

.3%

86

.7%

86

.7%

86

.7%

86

.7%

90

.0%

90

.0%

93

.3%

93

.3%

96

.7%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

S30

S26

S28

S42

S29

S35

S40

S39

S32

S23

S38

S24

S33

S36

S43

S31

S25

S34

S41

S37

S27

Pre/Post Assessment Scores for Block 3

Pre % Post %

16

.7%

40

.0%

36

.7%

10

.0%

16

.7%

33

.3%

30

.0%

20

.0%

26

.7%

50

.0%

40

.0%

20

.0%

30

.0%

26

.7%

23

.3%

20

.0%

23

.3%

26

.7%

30

.0%

56

.7%

30

.0%

33

.3%

50

.0%

63

.3%

66

.7%

70

.0%

70

.0%

73

.3%

73

.3%

76

.7%

80

.0%

80

.0%

80

.0%

80

.0%

80

.0%

83

.3%

83

.3%

83

.3%

83

.3%

83

.3%

86

.7%

86

.7%

96

.7%

96

.7%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

S60

S52

S61

S48

S46

S56

S57

S50

S54

S53

S58

S62

S51

S65

S45

S49

S47

S64

S63

S44

S59

S55

Pre/Post Assessment Scores for Block 4

Pre % Post %

AN EXAMPLE TWS 17

Before instruction, none of my students demonstrated mastery of any of my learning

goals. At the conclusion of my unit, 63% of my students had demonstrated mastery of Learning

Goal 1, 76% had mastered Learning Goal 2, and 45% of my students had mastered Learning

Goal 3. Also, 25% of my students demonstrated mastery of all three learning goals, and only 8%

had not shown mastery of any of them. Since so few students have shown mastery of all three

goals, I plan to incorporate some review exercises in our assignments for the remainder of my

time with them. This will give me an opportunity to continue to review these concepts with the

class as a whole, and will give the students some much needed practice.

My cooperating teacher sometimes does what he calls, Extension Days after a unit of

instruction. These days feature fun, challenging, group enrichment activities that provide

advanced practice and application of the content of the unit. He told me that he had a few

activities on file that might work with my unit and suggested that I include an Extension Day in

next weeks plan. This would allow me to reinforce my students learning and pay close attention

for gaps in understanding that need filling. For the 5 students that had mastered none of the goals,

I will watch for opportunities to directly support them and provide remediation. If they do not

engage in the activity or appear to get frustrated, I can also pull them aside for some direct one-

on-one instruction.

Two students in my classes failed the post-assessment. One of these 2 students (S60) was

an ELL that was very resistant to instruction throughout the class and did not complete most of

her assignments. I attempted several times to determine what the problem might be and offer my

support. I even called her in from her elective classes to try and complete her work. She did not

respond to my efforts. As we discussed the post-assessment results together, my cooperating

teacher told me that an ELL receiving ESOL services cannot receive a D or an F as a final grade

Comment [ML43]: Indicator P5: My analysis of student learning is directly related to individual learning goals. The TWS GraphMaker provided all

the data that I needed for this part.

Indicator P6: I have reported the percent of my

students that showed mastery of the learning goals

both before and after instruction. This information was also provided to me by the TWS GraphMaker.

Comment [ML44]: Indicator P7: I have given a detailed plan to support the needs of students who have not demonstrated mastery of my learning goals.

I will need to give them ongoing support with these

skills as we continue through the rest of our curriculum.

AN EXAMPLE TWS 18

in a course unless a) it can be verified that the poor performance is not the result of a language

problem, and b) a conference was held with the parents and the ESOL compliance specialist

during the first semester. In hindsight, I should have made contact with her parents and worked

with them as soon as I noticed the problem.

The other student that failed (S14) was the student in RtI for a suspected Emotional

Behavioral Disability. This student seemed to do well throughout the entire unit. He seemed to

understand the instruction and did well on his assignments. Unfortunately, on the day of the post-

assessment, he was upset because of an incident in a previous class and was not interested in

doing careful work. He may have shown more improvement if he was allowed to take the

assessment at a later date. Comment [ML45]: Indicator P10: For any student that failed the post-assessment, I have to discuss what happened and what I did to try and

prevent failure. The TWS is part of a reflective

learning process. You might get to this step and realize what you should have done. That kind of

realization is still valuable and will make you a

better teacher in the future. Feel free to point out the lessons that you have learned.

AN EXAMPLE TWS 19

Evaluation and Reflection

Overall, I think the unit was a success. I think it was important that I decided to use word

problems like the FCAT uses that require multiple steps to find the answer. It required more

work for me, but I think it made a difference in student learning. I think one of the reasons the

pre-assessment scores were so low is because my students havent been asked many complex,

multi-step problems in their math classes before. I did use a few practice exercises from the book

as we learned individual skills in each lesson. By keeping my focus on the ultimate goal of

complex, multi-step word problems, though, I didnt decide that the students had gotten it until

I had them show me that kind of mastery. I did have to break down these kinds of problems into

smaller steps and teach my students how to analyze them, but I think the kind of assessments that

I used and the results that my students got on them shows that it worked. I think that my ability

to keep instruction and learning activities focused on the application and real-world use of the

skills Im teaching is one of my strengths as a teacher.

As I reflect on my experience with the TWS, I also notice some areas where I can grow

as a teacher. When I look at post-assessment data for ELLs, I notice a weakness of mine. On the

post-assessment, the ELLs in my classes scored an average of 67.9%, which is 14.5 points lower

than students who are not receiving ESOL services. Also, none of my ELLs showed mastery of

all three learning goals. I need to pay attention to this difficulty. I plan to read about effective

ESOL accommodations and attend some workshops to help me grow in these skills and become

a much more effective teacher.

One of the main things that I learned from this unit is that if we want our students to use

higher-order reasoning to solve complex, multi-step, real-world problems, then we have to teach

them those skills. Just because a student understands all of the separate skills that a complex

Comment [ML46]: Indicator P7: As I write my Evaluation and Reflection, the conclusions I make

should be consistent with all of the data that I discussed in the previous component. If the evidence

for my conclusion isnt already in the Analysis of Student Learning component, I should include the

data in the text of this component.

Comment [ML47]: Indicator P4: I specifically identify at least one of my strengths as a teacher.

Comment [ML48]: Indicator P5: I identify, acknowledge, and reflect on one of my weaknesses as a teacher. If, as you write about the areas in which

you can grow as a teacher, you can also think of how

to develop those skills, you are well on your way to meeting exemplary Indicator E5.

AN EXAMPLE TWS 20

problem requires doesnt mean that they will naturally be able to string those skills together on

their own. Students must be taught how to analyze complex problems, how to break those

problems down into more manageable steps, and how to figure out which skills to apply to each

step. Drill and practice pages dont accomplish this level of understanding.

I think this lesson is reflected in my most effective and my least effective learning goal.

Learning Goal 2 was my most effective learning goal, with my students soring an average of

83.8% on these items and 76.9% of my students demonstrating mastery. Both values were the

highest of any of my learning goals. I think that Learning Goal 2 was so effective because I

planned from the beginning to teach my students how to work through complex, composite

figures. Since I specifically taught them the problem solving techniques that they would need for

these kinds of exercises, my students were much more proficient at using them.

Learning Goal 3 was my least effective learning goal, with my students scoring an

average of 74.3% on its items and only 44.3% of them demonstrating mastery. As I discussed in

my second example of instructional decision making, I did not start by explicitly teaching my

students how to use algebraic reasoning to approach these kinds of problems. By the time I went

back and tried to fix my error, though, I think some of the damage had already been done. All of

the students that chose to resubmit the Missing Measures assignment demonstrated mastery of

that Learning Goal, but far too few students took the opportunity for the additional practice. If I

teach a similar unit again, I will definitely start with algebraic thinking, and then apply it to

geometry. I think that will have much better results.

Comment [ML49]: Indicator P6: I learned a lot through my TWS. In this passage I reflect on the biggest thing I learned about teaching and learning. I

could also discuss something that I learned about

assessment or specific teaching techniques. To meet this indicator, I need to reflect on something that I

learned about education, in general, beyond the

things I learn about teaching this specific content.

Comment [ML50]: Indicator P1: Both my most effective and my least effective learning goals are

identified specifically in the next two paragraphs,

meeting this indicator.

Comment [ML51]: Since I did not include this data in my Analysis of Student Learning component,

I must include it here to support identifying LG2 as

the most effective.

Comment [ML52]: Indicator P2: I identify and reflect upon the things that contributed to the success of LG2.

Comment [ML53]: Since I did not include this data in my Analysis of Student Learning component, I must include it here to support identifying LG3 as

the least effective.

Comment [ML54]: Indicator P3: I identify and reflect on the things that may have hindered growth

on LG3, and talk about how to avoid this problem in

the future.