An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

20
An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools’ Technology Integration Michelle Fulks Read, Sara Jolly Jones, Joan E. Hughes, Gloria Gonzales-Dholakia The University of Texas at Austin

description

This presentation, given at AERA 2010, provides findings from research comparing two schools and the use of technology both at home and at school by students, both personally and professionally by teachers and by administrators.

Transcript of An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Page 1: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools’ Technology Integration

Michelle Fulks Read, Sara Jolly Jones, Joan E. Hughes, Gloria Gonzales-DholakiaThe University of Texas at Austin

Page 2: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Technology Integration

•Digital Communication Technologies

•Support Socio-constructivist Instruction

•Subject Area Content

Page 3: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Saguaro MS

• Rural

• 1,000 students

• 74% Hispanic

• 20% African-American

• 74% Econ. Disadvantaged

• MET AYP “Acceptable”

• 1 lab, 2 carts, 8 library computers

• Shared Tech. Integration Specialist

Porter MS

• Urban

• 1,000 students

• 50% White (w/transfers)

• 50% Hispanic/African-Am

• 39% Econ. Disadvantaged

• MET AYP “Acceptable”

• 4 labs, 2 carts, 18 library computers

• Dedicated Tech. Integration Specialist

Page 4: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Research Question

Are there differences in technology integration between Porter and Saguaro Middle Schools looking at factors related

to students, teachers, and leaders?

Page 5: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Data collection…

• Student, teacher and leader surveys

Saguaro MS

• 4 leaders• 11 teachers• 234 students

Porter MS

• 9 leaders• 16 teachers• 309 students

Page 6: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Data Analysis…

• Descriptive measures

• Pearson’s coefficient

• Chi-square

• t-Tests

Page 7: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Technology Activities

• Communication

• Web

• Productivity

• Creativity

Page 8: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Significant Factors…

• School

– Strong and significant for in-school

– None or weak significance outside of school

• Gender

• Grade

• Computer Ownership

– 83% of Saguaro students own a computer

– 95% of Porter students own a computer

Page 9: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Reported Student Use

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Pe

rce

nta

ge o

f St

ud

en

ts(o

f th

ose

wh

o in

dic

ate

d u

se)

Porter Saguaro

In-school

Out-of-school

Both

Page 10: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Porter Students…

• 3.5 to 5 times more likely to participate in technology activities in school

– Most difference in Creativity Activities

• 3.5 to 4.75 times more likely to participate in technology activities both in and out of school

– Most difference in Creativity Activities

Page 11: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Saguaro Students…

• Reported more frequent use of technology in all categories

•Reported higher skill levels in regards to productivity activities

Page 12: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

In-Class Technology Use

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Math Writing Math Writing

Pe

rce

nta

ge o

f U

sers

Teachers

Students

Page 13: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Summary…

• More out-of-school technology use than in-school use at both school

• More teacher use of technology than student use

• Porter students are significantly more likely to report use of technology in school and in- and out-of-school

Page 14: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Teacher Beliefs and Attitudes

• Technology Self-efficacy:– Porter= 3.14– Saguaro=2.96

• Attitudes Toward Technology:– Porter=3.17– Saguaro=3.46

• Directive /Constructivist Philosophy– Porter=2.05– Saguaro=1.9

Page 15: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Breakdown of teachers use…

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Read a blog or wiki Social Networking Online productivity Share creations online

Pe

rce

nta

ge o

f Te

ach

ers

Porter

Saguaro

Page 16: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Participation in professional development opportunities

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Pe

rce

nta

ge r

ep

ort

ing

Porter Saguaro

Skill

Content

Page 17: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Differences in leaders’ knowledge

17 1320

30

1023

715 12

29

1218

16 2118

22

11

17

1410

9

19

14

18

17 1922

17

20

21

1317

18

25

19

17

1922

15

26

11

14

10

1410

26

9

26

8

15 13

21

8

18

15

18

10

12

11

2027

2114

31

12

17

11

22

12

27

12

28

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

NET

S-A

To

tal S

core

Social, Legal & Ethical Issues

Assessement & Evaluation

Support, Management & Operations

Productivity & Professional Practice

Teaching & Learning

Leadership & Vision

Page 18: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Differences in leaders’ ranking of improvement in various categories.

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Pe

rce

nta

ge o

f A

gre

em

en

t

Porter Saguaro

Not Successful Moderately Successful Very Successful

Page 19: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

Digital DivideDigital

Inequality

Page 20: An Ecological Case Study of Two Middle Schools' Technology Integration

For more information or a copy of the complete paper, contact:

Joan E. Hughes, PhD

The University of Texas at Austin

E-mail: [email protected]

www.techedges.org