Amir Amini CEng , FIMechE - Heat Exchanger · Exchanger with Embedded finned Heat Pipe and PCM 10th...

21
Thermal Energy Storage Heat Exchanger with Embedded finned Heat Pipe and PCM Amir Amini CEng , FIMechE Group Senior Research Specialist The 32 nd HEXAG Meeting Newcastle University 19 th May 2015

Transcript of Amir Amini CEng , FIMechE - Heat Exchanger · Exchanger with Embedded finned Heat Pipe and PCM 10th...

  • Thermal Energy Storage Heat

    Exchanger with Embedded

    finned Heat Pipe and PCM

    10th of Feb 2015

    Amir Amini CEng , FIMechE Group Senior Research Specialist

    The 32nd HEXAG Meeting Newcastle University

    19th May 2015

  • 2

    Summary

    • Introduction

    • PCM

    • TES Prototype Heat Exchanger

    • Experimental Rig

    • Results and discussions

    • Recommendation

    • Barrier to develop large scale PCM

  • 3

    Thermal

    properties

    • Phase change

    temperature in

    suitable

    operating

    range

    • High latent

    heat

    per unit mass

    • High specific

    heat

    Physical

    properties

    • High density

    • Low density

    variation during

    phase change

    • Little or no

    super-

    cooling

    Chemical

    stability

    •No chemical decomposition

    •Compatibility with container

    materials

    •Non-poisonous, non-

    flammable

    and non-explosive

    • Available in large quantities

    • Inexpensive

    Economic factors

    *PCM selection

    * Regin, A.F., Solanki, S.C. and Saini, J.S., Heat transfer characteristics of thermal

    energy storage system using PCM capsules: A review. Renewable and Sustainable

    Energy Reviews, 12 (2008), p. 2438–2458 Feasibility studies is based on the currently

    available PCMs.

  • 4

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350

    Late

    nt

    Hea

    t (k

    J/kg

    )

    Phase Change Temperature (⁰C)

    Physical Properties of Various Manufacturers' Phase Change MaterialsACME PCP Australia PureTemp RGEES Rubitherm Salca Sasol Finoric Microtek Labs Climator Sweden AB PlusICE

    >200 O C

  • 5

    Sub-

    cooling

    Temperature below melting point

  • 6

    SH Storage system vs. LH Storage system

    Q = 𝑚 𝐶𝑝 DT= V cp ∆T ρ Q=m ( cp · ΔT + Δhmelt )PCM

    = V ρ ( cp · ΔT + Δ

    hmelt )PCM

    Utilised heat capacity and change in Temp during charging and

    discharging

    The smaller the working temperature difference, ΔT , the bigger the

    advantage of a latent heat storage unit versus a hot water storage

    unit.

  • 7

    • Automotive Direct / Indirect Passive Cooling

    • Temperature Controlled Packaging & Shipping

    • Military Backpack Battery Cooling

    • Formula-1 Driver Comfort

    • Datasafe Protection against Fire

    • Integrated Domestic Solar Cooling & Heating

    • Drink Can Passive Cooling

    • Car Exhaust Heat Recovery Device for

    Domestic Hot water Application

    Typical small scale

    applications

  • 8Thermal Energy Storage with PCMBased on literature search, only a relatively small number of

    results have been reported on successful system studies with

    high capacity and high power rated storage units, especially for

    solar heating systems

    Changzhou Sunhome Solar Water

    Heater Manufacture Co. 100ton

    high temperature molten salt

    storage tank.

  • 9

    PCM Selected Product name: PLUSICE S89

    Hydrated Salt base PCM, Mg

    (NO3)2.6H2O 252

    Melting point Tm = 89ºC

    Latent heat Capacity = 151 kJ/kg

    Volumetric Heat Capacity=234 MJ/m3

    Liquid density = 1550 kg/m3

    Specific Heat Capacity = 2.48 KJ/kg・KThermal conductivity = 0.67 W/m・KMaximum Operation Temperature=120 ºC

  • TES Prototype

    Heat Exchanger

    Thermocouples

    Stainless Steel

    Working Fluid Coil

    Stainless Steel Heat Pipe

    PCM Tank

    Heat Transfer

    Fluid, in &out

    PCM_mpeg4.mp4

  • Schematic Diagram of the Experimental Rig

  • Thermal Energy Storage Heat Exchanger

    test rig

    Working Fluid (Water)

    inlet and outlet

    Thermocouples

    Steam supply

    line

    Condensate

    line

    PCM

  • 13

    Real Time PCM Charging and Discharging Data

  • 14

    Experimental Results

    Charging, PCM melting

    (A) (B) (C)

    (D) (E) (F) (G)

    (H) (I)

    A:t = 90 min

    B:t = 140 min

    C to H

    I:fully melted PCM at time=500 min

  • 15

    Discharging

    A:Solidification began DB EC

    GF JI K: 50 minutes

  • 16Energy stored in PCM and Energy released from

    PCM during Charging and Discharging.

  • 17

    Two phase

    Liquid/SolidPhase

    ChangeLiquid

    Melting

    point

    Charging Discharging

    Variation of PCM temperature during heating

    and cooling process using steam as HTF

  • 18

    Recommendations

    • Identify advanced heat transfer mechanisms for charging and discharging.

    • Increasing the efficiency of long term heat storage systems with better insulation

    • Higher efficiency could be achieved by optimising the performance of the Heat exchanger and selecting PCM with higher thermal conductivity.

    • Further investigations require determining how heat pipe might be adjusted and optimized in TES heat exchanger to improve phase change rate in charging and discharging the PCM

  • 19

    Barrier to the development of large scale TES system:

    • Size of the system

    • Low thermal conductivity of most PCMs

    •Use of Heat Pipe to increase heat transfer rates, but they all occupy volume within the PCM heat exchanger, reducing stored Energy

    • Enhance the process of heat transfer.

    • Finding suitable applications

  • 20

    Continue

    Barrier to the development of large scale TES system:

    • Too high investment costs of the total storage system

    • Materials for use as PCM are still too expensive

    • Low energy density of thermal storage systems

    • Reliability of thermal energy storage systems

    • Too large loss of heat over time

    • Insufficient knowledge about system integration

    • Insufficient knowledge about environmental impacts

  • 21

    Thank You