Amex's Shareholders via Lankford vs Amex's Chenault & Others
53
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/20/2015 11:06 AM INDEX NO. 650866/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/20/2015
-
Upload
inspector-mctaggarts-crime-series -
Category
Documents
-
view
8 -
download
0
description
Australian Reserve Bank documents and other preponderance evidence led Judge Garaufis to find that Amex' clauses are against antitrust laws. Shareholders here sue many of Amex's Board Members & Audit Committee. Pleadings seek refunds and clawbacks of bonuses and many types of alleged losses. Will Amex succed on appeal? Was the market properly informed from 2008 onwards about the risks? Were the Amex-style Arbitration Scheme clauses at "FOS" a reason why the TransPacific Partnership ISDS clauses were like a MiniMe on Steroids???
Transcript of Amex's Shareholders via Lankford vs Amex's Chenault & Others
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/20/2015 11:06 AM INDEX NO. 650866/2015
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/20/2015
