American Society using the Aesthetics in 1976 for Dental ... · (Tooth-to-Tooth Width) Levin EI...

23
Daniel H Ward DDS Proportional Smile Design Proportional Smile Design RED Proportion using the Dr. Irwin Smigel Pioneer in Aesthetic Dentistry Founded the American Society for Dental Aesthetics in 1976 Subjective Smile Evaluation TLAR Principle Smile Design Methods Objective Smile Evaluation Proportional Smile Design Smile Design Methods Proportion The relation between one part to another or to the whole Harmonious relation of parts to each other or to the whole: BALANCE, SYMMETRY Definition UNIQUE Proportion with interesting mathematical properties Ancient Greeks Recognized Proportions

Transcript of American Society using the Aesthetics in 1976 for Dental ... · (Tooth-to-Tooth Width) Levin EI...

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    Proportional Smile DesignProportional Smile Design

    REDProportion

    using the

    Dr. Irwin Smigel

    Pioneer in Aesthetic Dentistry

    Founded the American Society

    for Dental Aesthetics in 1976

    Subjective Smile Evaluation

    TLAR Principle

    Smile Design Methods

    Objective Smile Evaluation

    Proportional Smile Design

    Smile Design Methods

    Proportion

    The relation between one part to another or to the wholeHarmonious relation of parts to each other or to the whole: BALANCE, SYMMETRY

    Definition

    62%

    UNIQUE Proportion with interesting mathematical

    properties

    Ancient GreeksRecognized Proportions

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    Phidias

    Ancient GreeksRecognized Proportions

    Correlation exists between “beauty, nature and

    mathematics”

    Ancient Mathematician Phidias

    Illustrated human anatomy with the Golden Proportion

    ArtistLeonardo da Vinci

    Proportions and angles are carefully analyzed

    Facial Plastic Surgeons

    Powell and Humphreys

    Facial Plastic Surgery Textbook

    Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York. Thieme-Stratton, 1984.

    • Divide face into equal fifths

    • Each fifth is an eye width

    Rule of Fifths

    Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York. Thieme-Stratton, 1984.

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    • Forehead - from Trichion to Nasion

    • Cheek - Nasion to Subnasale

    • Mouth - Subnasaleto Menton

    Trichion

    Nasion

    Subnasale

    Menton

    Rule of Thirds

    Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York. Thieme-Stratton, 1984.

    • Divide subnasaleand menton into equal Thirds

    • Incisal edge at junction of Superior and Middle Thirds

    Incisal Edge

    Rule of Thirds

    Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York. Thieme-Stratton, 1984.

    • Central Incisor is 1/16th the Width of Inter-Zygomatic Width

    “House” Proportion

    House MM, Loop JL: Form and Color Harmony in the Dental Art. Whittier, California, Monograph, 1937, pp3-33.

    • Central Incisor is 1/16th the Length from Ideal Hairline to Chin

    “House” Proportion

    House MM, Loop JL: Form and Color Harmony in the Dental Art. Whittier, California, Monograph, 1937, pp3-33.

    • Use Trubyte indicator to determine WIDTH proportions

    1/16 Inter-zygomaticwidth

    Trubyte Proportion Guide

    • Use Trubyte indicator to determine LENGTH proportions

    Rule of Thirds combined with 1/16 trichion-

    menton length

    Trubyte Proportion Guide

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    • Width of central incisor is 1/7 inter-pupillary width

    Isa ZM, Tawfiq OF, Noor NM. Shamsudheen MI, Rijal OM. Regression methods to investigate the relationship between facial measurements and widths of the maxillary anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 103:182-188.

    Using Inter-pupillary width for width of central incisor

    • Width of Anterior Teeth in Golden Proportion to the Inter-commissural Width

    Proportion of Anterior Teeth to the Face

    Rufenacht CR. Fundamentals of Esthetics. Chicago. Quintessence. 1990:67-134.

    Anterior 6 too wide

    Rufenacht CR. Fundamentals of Esthetics. Chicago. Quintessence. 1990:67-134.

    Anterior 6 too narrow

    Rufenacht CR. Fundamentals of Esthetics. Chicago. Quintessence. 1990:67-134.

    Levin - JPD 1978“Dental Esthetics and the

    Golden Proportion”

    “The widths of the maxillary central incisors are in golden proportion to the lateral incisors as seen from the frontal”

    1.618 X 62%=1

    1 X 62%=0.618

    Golden Proportion(Tooth-to-Tooth Width)

    Levin EI Dental esthetics and the golden proportion. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:244-252.

    Snow - JED 1999“Esthetic Smile Analysis of

    Anterior Tooth Width: The Golden Percentage”“The widths of the maxillary central incisors, lateral incisors, & canines should be 25%, 15%, & 10% of the total frontal view width of the anterior 6 teeth ”

    CI=25% ICW

    LI=15% ICW

    C=10% ICW

    Golden Mean(Tooth-to-Tooth Width)

    Snow SR, Esthetic smile analysis of anterior tooth width:thegolden percentage. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:177-184.

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    Lombardi - JPD 1973“The principles of visual

    perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics”

    “The existing proportion between the width of the maxillary central incisor and lateral incisor should be consistent as you progress distally”

    Repeated Ratio(Tooth-to-Tooth Width)

    Lombardi RE. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent 1973:29:358-382.

    Preston Proportion(Tooth-to-Tooth Width)

    Preston - JED 1993“The golden proportion revisited”

    “The golden proportion was found in the relationship between the perceived width of the maxillary central and lateral incisors in only 17% of observed images” LI=CI * 66%

    C=LI * 84%Preston JD. The golden proportion revisited. J Esthetic Dent 1993;5:247-251.

    Tooth to ToothWidth Proportions

    Problem is none relate tooth width proportions with

    tooth height

    Golden

    Proportion

    GoldenMeanPres

    ton

    Proportion

    Repeated Ratio……

    RED Proportion

    Ward DH. Proportional smile design using the RED proportion. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:143-154.

    “The proportion between the successive widths of the teeth as viewed from the frontal should remain

    constant as you move distally”

    RED Proportion

    Ward DH. Proportional smile design using the RED proportion. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:143-154.

    Without pre-existing constraints

    Sample RED Proportions

    Ward DH. Proportional smile design using the RED proportion. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:143-154.

    x 0.8x 0.64x

    x 0.7x 0.49x

    x 0.62x

    0.38x

    Same size Central Incisors

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    Sample RED Proportions

    Ward DH. Proportional smile design using the RED proportion. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:143-154.

    Same Inter-Canine Width

    Same Tooth Heights

    DifferentCentral

    Incisor W/H Ratios

    Orthodontics-Treatment Planning-Missing Laterals

    “Is the space alright?”

    (Speak now or forever hold your peace)

    6.6mm

    8.5 mm

    = 0.78 = 78%W/L Ratio

    6.6mm=Central Incisor Width8.5mm=Central Incisor Length

    6.6 8.5

    “Is the space alright?”

    (Speak now or forever hold your peace)

    4.6 4.6

    Lateral Incisor Width = 4.6 mm

    CIW * 0.7 = LIW6.6mm * 0.7 = 4.6mm

    Orthodontics-Treatment Planning-Missing Laterals

    “Is the space alright?”

    (Speak now or forever hold your peace)

    4.6 4.6

    Lateral Incisor Width = 4.6 mm

    CIW * 0.7 = LIW6.6mm * 0.7 = 4.6mm

    Orthodontics-Treatment Planning-Missing Laterals

    “Is the space alright?”

    (Speak now or forever hold your peace)

    4.6 4.6

    Lateral Incisor Width = 4.6 mm

    CIW * 0.7 = LIW6.6mm * 0.7 = 4.6mm

    Orthodontics-Treatment Planning-Missing Laterals

    4.6 4.6

    …to determine how dentists rate anterior tooth arrangements with different tooth-to-tooth width proportions and whether the best-ranked tooth proportions are affected by inciso-gingival tooth length.

    Rosenstiel SF, Ward DH, Rashid RG. Dentists’ Preferences of Anterior Tooth Proportion-A Web-based Study. J Prosthodont 2000;9:123-136.

    Smile Research Study

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    Rosenstiel SF, Ward DH, Rashid RG. Dentists’ Preferences of Anterior Tooth Proportion-A Web-based Study. J Prosthodont 2000;9:123-136.

    Results-TALL Teeth

    62% RED ProportionRosenstiel SF, Ward DH, Rashid RG. Dentists’ Preferences of Anterior Tooth Proportion-A Web-based Study. J Prosthodont 2000;9:123-136.

    Results-Average Teeth

    70% RED Proportion

    Rosenstiel SF, Ward DH, Rashid RG. Dentists’ Preferences of Anterior Tooth Proportion-A Web-based Study. J Prosthodont 2000;9:123-136.

    Results-Short Teeth

    80% RED Proportion

    “The majority (of 430 North American dentists surveyed) chose central incisors that were as close to 0.75-0.78 width/length ratio as possible.”

    Rosenstiel SF, Ward DH, Rashid RG. Dentists’ Preferences of Anterior Tooth Proportion-A Web-based Study. J Prosthodont 2000;9:123-136.

    Results

    86% W/L Ratio

    Width/Length Ratio of Central IncisorsWidth/Length Ratio of Central IncisorsNaturally Observed

    Sterret JD, Robinson F, Fortson W, Knaak B, Russell CM. Width/length ratios of normal clinical crowns of the maxillary anterior dimension in man. J Clin Periodontol1999;26:153-7.

    Gillen RJ, Schwartz RS, Hilton TJ, Evans DB. An analysis of selected normative tooth proportions. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:410-7.

    Hasanreisoglu U, Berksun S, Aras K, ArslanI. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions. J ProsthodontDent 2005;94:530-8.

    78% W/L Ratio

    Width/Length Ratio of Central IncisorsWidth/Length Ratio of Central IncisorsYoung Patients & Dentist Preferred

    Magne P, Gallucci GO, Belser UC. Anatomic crown width/length ratios of unworn and worn maxillary teeth in white suspects. J ProsthodontDent 2003;89(5):453-61.

    Orozco-Varo A, Arroyo-Cruz G, Martinez-de-Fuentes R, Jiminez-Castellanos E. Biometric analysis of the clinical crown and the width/length ratio in the maxillary anterior region. CNaylor CK. Esthetic Treatment Planning: The Grid Analysis System. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14:76-84. Wolfart S. Thormann H, Freitag S, Kern M. Assessment of dental appearance following changes in incisor proportions. J Oral Rehabil2006;33:489-495.

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    Patients seeking Aesthetic Treatment desire a MORE Youthful Appearance

    Width/Length Ratio of Central IncisorsWidth/Length Ratio of Central Incisors

    78% W/L86% W/L

    86% W/L 78% W/L

    Preferred RED Proportions78% w/hratio

    78% w/hratio

    78% w/hratio

    Very Short

    Average

    Very Tall

    Same Inter-canine tooth width

    Relative Tooth heights

    Rosenstiel SF, Ward DH, Rashid RG. Dentists’ Preferences of Anterior Tooth Proportion-A Web-based Study. J Prosthodont2000;9:123-136.

    •Central Incisor should maintain 78% width/height ratio

    •The taller the central incisor the wider it should be

    •The taller the central incisor the smaller the RED Proportion used

    •The taller the central incisor the more dominant it becomes in the arch

    •The wider the central incisor the narrower the resulting lateral incisor and canine

    RED Proportion Principles

    •The shorter the central incisor the narrower it should be

    •The shorter the central incisor the larger the RED Proportion used

    •The shorter the central incisor the more similar the relative individual tooth widths

    •The narrower the central incisor the wider the resulting lateral incisor and canine

    •Clinical judgment is paramount

    RED Proportion Principles

    15 Year Old

    Minimally Invasive Dentistry

    RED Proportion Template

    Treatment Planning

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    RED Proportion Template

    Treatment Planning

    Dr. Paul Belvedere

    A Pioneer in Direct Composite Dentistry

    Restore opposite teeth

    Pre-Operative

    Finished Restorations

    Observed Proportions

    Ali Fayyad MA, Jamani KD, Aqrabawi J. Geometric and Mathematical Proportions and their Relations to Maxillary Anterior Teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006;5:62-70.

    “The Golden Proportion and Recurring Esthetic Dental (RED) Proportion were not found to exist between the maxillary anterior teeth of the natural dentition.”

    (Photos of 376 Jordanian dental students)

    The RED Proportion is a mathematical tool to aid in the diagnosis and treatment planning of a smile. It is not a study of what was observed in nature, but a model that can create balance and symmetry pleasing to dentists and patients.

    RED Proportion

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    Study of Preferred Proportions

    …to determine if North American dentists surveyed prefer the Recurring Esthetic Dental (RED) proportion, other mathematical-defined proportions or naturally occurring tooth-to-tooth width proportions

    Ward DH. A Study of Dentists’ Preferred Anterior Tooth Proportions:Comparing the RED Proportion to other mathematical and naturally occurring proportions. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19:323-336.

    NatureScience

    Preston Natural Proportion

    #2a

    Average Height

    Golden Proportion

    #2b

    Average Height

    Preston Natural Proportion70% Preference over Golden

    #2a

    Average Height

    Golden Proportion

    #3a

    Average Height

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    70% RED Proportion

    #3b

    Average Height

    70% RED Proportion75% Preference over Golden

    #3b

    Average Height

    Preston Natural Proportion

    #4a

    Average Height

    70% RED Proportion

    #4b

    Average Height

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    70% RED Proportion57% Preference over Natural

    #4b

    Average Height

    Preston Natural Proportion

    Tall#5a

    Golden (62% RED) Proportion

    Tall#5b

    Tall

    Golden (62% RED) Proportion58% Preference over Natural

    #5b

    Conclusions• With average length teeth Natural and 70%

    RED Proportion smiles were preferred significantly over Golden Proportion >2:1

    • Smiles created using the principles of the RED Proportion where preferred by a majority of North American dentists surveyed.

    • Use of Golden Proportion (62% RED Proportion) was only preferred with tall teeth

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    Average Length Teeth

    CIx66% RED LI-0.33mm

    Average Length TeethAverage Length Teeth

    Identical Size

    CIx66% RED LI-0.33mm

    Average Length Teeth Simple Equation to use the Inter-canine Width (ICW) and the RED Proportion to

    calculate the Central Incisor Width (CIW)

    Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.

    62% RED70% RED80% RED

    ICW RED CIW

    Simplified Chart to use the Inter-canine Width (ICW) and the RED Proportion to

    calculate the Central Incisor Width (CIW)

    Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.

    Clinical Use

    Using the Inter-canine Width (ICW) and the RED Proportion to calculate the Central

    Incisor Width (CIW)

    Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    VERY SHORT

    AVERAGE

    VERY TALL

    STEP 1-Determine Tooth Height

    TALL

    SHORT

    Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.

    STEP 2-Measure Inter-Canine Width

    Lookup Tooth Length in Chart

    Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.

    Using RED to determine individual tooth widths

    Average Length

    Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.

    70% RED

    If average length ICW Width

    4.4

    STEP 3a-Divide Inter-Canine Width by factor for CIW

    Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.

    Central Incisor Width* 0.7

    STEP 3b-Multiply CIW* 70% for Lateral Incisor WidthIf average length

    70% REDWard DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    Canine Width *07

    STEP 3c-Multiply LIW * 70% for CW

    70% RED

    If average length

    Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.

    VERY SHORT

    AVERAGE

    VERY TALL

    STEP 1-Determine Tooth Height

    TALL

    Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.

    SHORT

    STEP 2-Measure Inter-Canine Width

    Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.

    Lookup Tooth Length in Chart

    Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.

    Using RED to determine individual tooth widths

    Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.

    ICW

    4.0

    STEP 3a-Divide Inter-Canine Width by factor

    62% RED

    If very tall length

    Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    Central Incisor Width * 0.62

    STEP 3b-Multiply CIW* 62% for Lateral Incisor Width

    62% RED

    If very tall length

    Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.

    Using RED to determine individual tooth widths

    Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.

    Inquiring about laminates

    “I don’t like the spaces between my front teeth”

    Smile Analysis

    Teeth not centered with philtrum

    Smile Analysis

    Canted midline

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    Determining ideal width of central incisor

    Constant 78% W/H Ratio

    ICW

    4.8

    ICW

    4.4

    ICW

    4.0

    Short

    Average

    Tall

    Use 70% RED Proportion

    Calculating Tooth Widths

    35.6------ = 8.1mm CI4.4

    8.1*0.7= 5.7mm LI

    5.7*0.7= 4.0mm C

    35.6mm

    Use 78% W/L Ratio

    Calculating Central Incisor Length

    35.6------ = 8.1mm CI4.4

    8.1/0.78= 10.4mm CI

    35.6mm

    8.1mm10.4m

    m

    Post-Treatment

    Short Average Tall

    80% RED 70% RED 62% RED

    Relating the Size of the Teeth to the FaceRelating the Size of the Teeth to the Face

    Short Average Tall

    80% RED 70% RED 62% RED

    Relating the Size of the Teeth to the Face

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    Different RED Proportions can be used according to desired tooth length

    Different RED Proportions can be used according to desired tooth length

    Methods to Gain Favorable Width/Length Ratio in Short Teeth

    Methods to Gain Favorable Width/Length Ratio in Short Teeth

    Adding Length to Central Incisor allows Smaller RED Proportion

    Adding Length to Central Incisor allows Smaller RED Proportion

    Missing Lateral Incisors Replaced by Maryland bridges

    “My bridges are loose and my front teeth hurt.”

    Tooth size is too small

    Lateral Smile Views

    Radiographic Evaluation revealed that #8-9 require endodontic root canal therapy

    De-Bonded Metal Abutments to Centrals

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    DETERMINE DESIRED RELATIVE TOOTH HEIGHT

    Patient exhibits Short Tooth Length

    …BUT Average Facial Height

    PRE-OPERATIVE MEASUREMENTS

    MEASURE INTERCANINE WIDTH (ICW)

    Measure available ICW space

    37.6 mm

    CALCULATE CENTRAL INCISOR WIDTH (CIW)

    Divide ICW by divisor for average tooth height to determine CIW

    ICW/divisor=CIW37.6/4.4=CIW8.5=CIW

    37.6 mm

    CALCULATE LATERAL INCISOR WIDTH (LIW)

    Multiply CIW X RED Proportion for average length teeth-70% RED (0.7)

    CIW*RED=LIW8.5*0.7=LIW6.0=LIW

    CALCULATE CANINE WIDTH (CW)

    Multiply LIW X RED Proportion for average length teeth-70% RED (0.7)

    LIW*RED=CW6.0*0.7=LIW4.2=CW

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    CALCULATE CENTRAL INCISOR WIDTH (CIL)

    Divide CIW by Desired W/L Ratio (0.78) to determine CIL

    CIW/0.78=CIL8.6/0.78=CIL11.0=CIL

    Incisal Edge Determinants

    • Esthetics

    • Phonetics

    • Anterior guidance / Occlusion

    Lengthen incisal edge #9 -0.5mm

    Incisal Edge Determinants

    • Esthetics

    • Phonetics

    • Anterior guidance / Occlusion

    Lengthen #9 - 2.5mm (0.5mm on incisal & 2.0mm at cervical

    Ideal Tooth Proportions Using the RED proportion

    Pre-Operative Measurements

    Desired Measurements

    No Periodontal Surgery Original Proportions Periodontal Surgery RED Proportions

    • Lengthen #9 2.5mm to 11mm• Widen Central Incisors to allow

    70% RED Proportion• Shift midline slightly to left

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    AfterPost Perio Surgery“I want a Model Smile”

    CALCULATE W/H RATIOOF CENTRAL INCISORS

    7.4 / 9.0 = 0.82 or 82%

    CALCULATERED PROPORTIONS

    1.0 / 4.5 = 0.22 or 22%

    CALCULATERED PROPORTIONS

    4.5 / 5.0 = 0.9 or 90%

    • Esthetics

    • Phonetics

    • Anterior guidance Occlusion

    DESIRED INCISAL EDGE POSITION

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    Determine ideal Central Incisor Width for 70% RED Proportion

    33.4CENTRAL INCISOR WIDTH = -------------------------

    4.4

    CENTRAL INCISOR WIDTH = 7.6mm

    Determining ideal Central Incisor Length for 78% W/L Ratio

    7.6CENTRAL INCISOR LENGTH = -------------------------

    0.78

    CENTRAL INCISOR LENGTH = 9.8mm

    Determining Maxillary Anterior Tooth Widths for 70% RED Proportion

    CIW*RED=LIW

    7.6*0.7=5.3=LIW

    LIW*RED=CW

    5.3*0.7=3.7=CW

    FIVE

    Pre-Treatment and Desired Tooth Dimensions

    FIVE

    Pre-Treatment and Desired Tooth Dimensions Treatment & Blueprint

    Imaged without Perio Surgery

  • Daniel H Ward DDS

    Treatment & Blueprint

    Imaged with Perio Surgery

    Treatment & Blueprint

    1 Month Post Perio Surgery

    Treatment & Blueprint

    2 Weeks post-treatment

    AfterBefore

    REMEMBERREMEMBER

    The Math is Important