American Society using the Aesthetics in 1976 for Dental ... · (Tooth-to-Tooth Width) Levin EI...
Transcript of American Society using the Aesthetics in 1976 for Dental ... · (Tooth-to-Tooth Width) Levin EI...
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
Proportional Smile DesignProportional Smile Design
REDProportion
using the
Dr. Irwin Smigel
Pioneer in Aesthetic Dentistry
Founded the American Society
for Dental Aesthetics in 1976
Subjective Smile Evaluation
TLAR Principle
Smile Design Methods
Objective Smile Evaluation
Proportional Smile Design
Smile Design Methods
Proportion
The relation between one part to another or to the wholeHarmonious relation of parts to each other or to the whole: BALANCE, SYMMETRY
Definition
62%
UNIQUE Proportion with interesting mathematical
properties
Ancient GreeksRecognized Proportions
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
Phidias
Ancient GreeksRecognized Proportions
Correlation exists between “beauty, nature and
mathematics”
Ancient Mathematician Phidias
Illustrated human anatomy with the Golden Proportion
ArtistLeonardo da Vinci
Proportions and angles are carefully analyzed
Facial Plastic Surgeons
Powell and Humphreys
Facial Plastic Surgery Textbook
Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York. Thieme-Stratton, 1984.
• Divide face into equal fifths
• Each fifth is an eye width
Rule of Fifths
Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York. Thieme-Stratton, 1984.
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
• Forehead - from Trichion to Nasion
• Cheek - Nasion to Subnasale
• Mouth - Subnasaleto Menton
Trichion
Nasion
Subnasale
Menton
Rule of Thirds
Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York. Thieme-Stratton, 1984.
• Divide subnasaleand menton into equal Thirds
• Incisal edge at junction of Superior and Middle Thirds
Incisal Edge
Rule of Thirds
Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York. Thieme-Stratton, 1984.
• Central Incisor is 1/16th the Width of Inter-Zygomatic Width
“House” Proportion
House MM, Loop JL: Form and Color Harmony in the Dental Art. Whittier, California, Monograph, 1937, pp3-33.
• Central Incisor is 1/16th the Length from Ideal Hairline to Chin
“House” Proportion
House MM, Loop JL: Form and Color Harmony in the Dental Art. Whittier, California, Monograph, 1937, pp3-33.
• Use Trubyte indicator to determine WIDTH proportions
1/16 Inter-zygomaticwidth
Trubyte Proportion Guide
• Use Trubyte indicator to determine LENGTH proportions
Rule of Thirds combined with 1/16 trichion-
menton length
Trubyte Proportion Guide
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
• Width of central incisor is 1/7 inter-pupillary width
Isa ZM, Tawfiq OF, Noor NM. Shamsudheen MI, Rijal OM. Regression methods to investigate the relationship between facial measurements and widths of the maxillary anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 103:182-188.
Using Inter-pupillary width for width of central incisor
• Width of Anterior Teeth in Golden Proportion to the Inter-commissural Width
Proportion of Anterior Teeth to the Face
Rufenacht CR. Fundamentals of Esthetics. Chicago. Quintessence. 1990:67-134.
Anterior 6 too wide
Rufenacht CR. Fundamentals of Esthetics. Chicago. Quintessence. 1990:67-134.
Anterior 6 too narrow
Rufenacht CR. Fundamentals of Esthetics. Chicago. Quintessence. 1990:67-134.
Levin - JPD 1978“Dental Esthetics and the
Golden Proportion”
“The widths of the maxillary central incisors are in golden proportion to the lateral incisors as seen from the frontal”
1.618 X 62%=1
1 X 62%=0.618
Golden Proportion(Tooth-to-Tooth Width)
Levin EI Dental esthetics and the golden proportion. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:244-252.
Snow - JED 1999“Esthetic Smile Analysis of
Anterior Tooth Width: The Golden Percentage”“The widths of the maxillary central incisors, lateral incisors, & canines should be 25%, 15%, & 10% of the total frontal view width of the anterior 6 teeth ”
CI=25% ICW
LI=15% ICW
C=10% ICW
Golden Mean(Tooth-to-Tooth Width)
Snow SR, Esthetic smile analysis of anterior tooth width:thegolden percentage. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:177-184.
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
Lombardi - JPD 1973“The principles of visual
perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics”
“The existing proportion between the width of the maxillary central incisor and lateral incisor should be consistent as you progress distally”
Repeated Ratio(Tooth-to-Tooth Width)
Lombardi RE. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent 1973:29:358-382.
Preston Proportion(Tooth-to-Tooth Width)
Preston - JED 1993“The golden proportion revisited”
“The golden proportion was found in the relationship between the perceived width of the maxillary central and lateral incisors in only 17% of observed images” LI=CI * 66%
C=LI * 84%Preston JD. The golden proportion revisited. J Esthetic Dent 1993;5:247-251.
Tooth to ToothWidth Proportions
Problem is none relate tooth width proportions with
tooth height
Golden
Proportion
GoldenMeanPres
ton
Proportion
Repeated Ratio……
RED Proportion
Ward DH. Proportional smile design using the RED proportion. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:143-154.
“The proportion between the successive widths of the teeth as viewed from the frontal should remain
constant as you move distally”
RED Proportion
Ward DH. Proportional smile design using the RED proportion. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:143-154.
Without pre-existing constraints
Sample RED Proportions
Ward DH. Proportional smile design using the RED proportion. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:143-154.
x 0.8x 0.64x
x 0.7x 0.49x
x 0.62x
0.38x
Same size Central Incisors
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
Sample RED Proportions
Ward DH. Proportional smile design using the RED proportion. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:143-154.
Same Inter-Canine Width
Same Tooth Heights
DifferentCentral
Incisor W/H Ratios
Orthodontics-Treatment Planning-Missing Laterals
“Is the space alright?”
(Speak now or forever hold your peace)
6.6mm
8.5 mm
= 0.78 = 78%W/L Ratio
6.6mm=Central Incisor Width8.5mm=Central Incisor Length
6.6 8.5
“Is the space alright?”
(Speak now or forever hold your peace)
4.6 4.6
Lateral Incisor Width = 4.6 mm
CIW * 0.7 = LIW6.6mm * 0.7 = 4.6mm
Orthodontics-Treatment Planning-Missing Laterals
“Is the space alright?”
(Speak now or forever hold your peace)
4.6 4.6
Lateral Incisor Width = 4.6 mm
CIW * 0.7 = LIW6.6mm * 0.7 = 4.6mm
Orthodontics-Treatment Planning-Missing Laterals
“Is the space alright?”
(Speak now or forever hold your peace)
4.6 4.6
Lateral Incisor Width = 4.6 mm
CIW * 0.7 = LIW6.6mm * 0.7 = 4.6mm
Orthodontics-Treatment Planning-Missing Laterals
4.6 4.6
…to determine how dentists rate anterior tooth arrangements with different tooth-to-tooth width proportions and whether the best-ranked tooth proportions are affected by inciso-gingival tooth length.
Rosenstiel SF, Ward DH, Rashid RG. Dentists’ Preferences of Anterior Tooth Proportion-A Web-based Study. J Prosthodont 2000;9:123-136.
Smile Research Study
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
Rosenstiel SF, Ward DH, Rashid RG. Dentists’ Preferences of Anterior Tooth Proportion-A Web-based Study. J Prosthodont 2000;9:123-136.
Results-TALL Teeth
62% RED ProportionRosenstiel SF, Ward DH, Rashid RG. Dentists’ Preferences of Anterior Tooth Proportion-A Web-based Study. J Prosthodont 2000;9:123-136.
Results-Average Teeth
70% RED Proportion
Rosenstiel SF, Ward DH, Rashid RG. Dentists’ Preferences of Anterior Tooth Proportion-A Web-based Study. J Prosthodont 2000;9:123-136.
Results-Short Teeth
80% RED Proportion
“The majority (of 430 North American dentists surveyed) chose central incisors that were as close to 0.75-0.78 width/length ratio as possible.”
Rosenstiel SF, Ward DH, Rashid RG. Dentists’ Preferences of Anterior Tooth Proportion-A Web-based Study. J Prosthodont 2000;9:123-136.
Results
86% W/L Ratio
Width/Length Ratio of Central IncisorsWidth/Length Ratio of Central IncisorsNaturally Observed
Sterret JD, Robinson F, Fortson W, Knaak B, Russell CM. Width/length ratios of normal clinical crowns of the maxillary anterior dimension in man. J Clin Periodontol1999;26:153-7.
Gillen RJ, Schwartz RS, Hilton TJ, Evans DB. An analysis of selected normative tooth proportions. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:410-7.
Hasanreisoglu U, Berksun S, Aras K, ArslanI. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions. J ProsthodontDent 2005;94:530-8.
78% W/L Ratio
Width/Length Ratio of Central IncisorsWidth/Length Ratio of Central IncisorsYoung Patients & Dentist Preferred
Magne P, Gallucci GO, Belser UC. Anatomic crown width/length ratios of unworn and worn maxillary teeth in white suspects. J ProsthodontDent 2003;89(5):453-61.
Orozco-Varo A, Arroyo-Cruz G, Martinez-de-Fuentes R, Jiminez-Castellanos E. Biometric analysis of the clinical crown and the width/length ratio in the maxillary anterior region. CNaylor CK. Esthetic Treatment Planning: The Grid Analysis System. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14:76-84. Wolfart S. Thormann H, Freitag S, Kern M. Assessment of dental appearance following changes in incisor proportions. J Oral Rehabil2006;33:489-495.
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
Patients seeking Aesthetic Treatment desire a MORE Youthful Appearance
Width/Length Ratio of Central IncisorsWidth/Length Ratio of Central Incisors
78% W/L86% W/L
86% W/L 78% W/L
Preferred RED Proportions78% w/hratio
78% w/hratio
78% w/hratio
Very Short
Average
Very Tall
Same Inter-canine tooth width
Relative Tooth heights
Rosenstiel SF, Ward DH, Rashid RG. Dentists’ Preferences of Anterior Tooth Proportion-A Web-based Study. J Prosthodont2000;9:123-136.
•Central Incisor should maintain 78% width/height ratio
•The taller the central incisor the wider it should be
•The taller the central incisor the smaller the RED Proportion used
•The taller the central incisor the more dominant it becomes in the arch
•The wider the central incisor the narrower the resulting lateral incisor and canine
RED Proportion Principles
•The shorter the central incisor the narrower it should be
•The shorter the central incisor the larger the RED Proportion used
•The shorter the central incisor the more similar the relative individual tooth widths
•The narrower the central incisor the wider the resulting lateral incisor and canine
•Clinical judgment is paramount
RED Proportion Principles
15 Year Old
Minimally Invasive Dentistry
RED Proportion Template
Treatment Planning
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
RED Proportion Template
Treatment Planning
Dr. Paul Belvedere
A Pioneer in Direct Composite Dentistry
Restore opposite teeth
Pre-Operative
Finished Restorations
Observed Proportions
Ali Fayyad MA, Jamani KD, Aqrabawi J. Geometric and Mathematical Proportions and their Relations to Maxillary Anterior Teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006;5:62-70.
“The Golden Proportion and Recurring Esthetic Dental (RED) Proportion were not found to exist between the maxillary anterior teeth of the natural dentition.”
(Photos of 376 Jordanian dental students)
The RED Proportion is a mathematical tool to aid in the diagnosis and treatment planning of a smile. It is not a study of what was observed in nature, but a model that can create balance and symmetry pleasing to dentists and patients.
RED Proportion
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
Study of Preferred Proportions
…to determine if North American dentists surveyed prefer the Recurring Esthetic Dental (RED) proportion, other mathematical-defined proportions or naturally occurring tooth-to-tooth width proportions
Ward DH. A Study of Dentists’ Preferred Anterior Tooth Proportions:Comparing the RED Proportion to other mathematical and naturally occurring proportions. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19:323-336.
NatureScience
Preston Natural Proportion
#2a
Average Height
Golden Proportion
#2b
Average Height
Preston Natural Proportion70% Preference over Golden
#2a
Average Height
Golden Proportion
#3a
Average Height
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
70% RED Proportion
#3b
Average Height
70% RED Proportion75% Preference over Golden
#3b
Average Height
Preston Natural Proportion
#4a
Average Height
70% RED Proportion
#4b
Average Height
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
70% RED Proportion57% Preference over Natural
#4b
Average Height
Preston Natural Proportion
Tall#5a
Golden (62% RED) Proportion
Tall#5b
Tall
Golden (62% RED) Proportion58% Preference over Natural
#5b
Conclusions• With average length teeth Natural and 70%
RED Proportion smiles were preferred significantly over Golden Proportion >2:1
• Smiles created using the principles of the RED Proportion where preferred by a majority of North American dentists surveyed.
• Use of Golden Proportion (62% RED Proportion) was only preferred with tall teeth
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
Average Length Teeth
CIx66% RED LI-0.33mm
Average Length TeethAverage Length Teeth
Identical Size
CIx66% RED LI-0.33mm
Average Length Teeth Simple Equation to use the Inter-canine Width (ICW) and the RED Proportion to
calculate the Central Incisor Width (CIW)
Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.
62% RED70% RED80% RED
ICW RED CIW
Simplified Chart to use the Inter-canine Width (ICW) and the RED Proportion to
calculate the Central Incisor Width (CIW)
Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.
Clinical Use
Using the Inter-canine Width (ICW) and the RED Proportion to calculate the Central
Incisor Width (CIW)
Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
VERY SHORT
AVERAGE
VERY TALL
STEP 1-Determine Tooth Height
TALL
SHORT
Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.
STEP 2-Measure Inter-Canine Width
Lookup Tooth Length in Chart
Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.
Using RED to determine individual tooth widths
Average Length
Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.
70% RED
If average length ICW Width
4.4
STEP 3a-Divide Inter-Canine Width by factor for CIW
Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.
Central Incisor Width* 0.7
STEP 3b-Multiply CIW* 70% for Lateral Incisor WidthIf average length
70% REDWard DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
Canine Width *07
STEP 3c-Multiply LIW * 70% for CW
70% RED
If average length
Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.
VERY SHORT
AVERAGE
VERY TALL
STEP 1-Determine Tooth Height
TALL
Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.
SHORT
STEP 2-Measure Inter-Canine Width
Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.
Lookup Tooth Length in Chart
Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.
Using RED to determine individual tooth widths
Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.
ICW
4.0
STEP 3a-Divide Inter-Canine Width by factor
62% RED
If very tall length
Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
Central Incisor Width * 0.62
STEP 3b-Multiply CIW* 62% for Lateral Incisor Width
62% RED
If very tall length
Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.
Using RED to determine individual tooth widths
Ward DH. Using the RED Proportion to Engineer the Perfect Smile. Dent Today 2008;27(8):112-117.
Inquiring about laminates
“I don’t like the spaces between my front teeth”
Smile Analysis
Teeth not centered with philtrum
Smile Analysis
Canted midline
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
Determining ideal width of central incisor
Constant 78% W/H Ratio
ICW
4.8
ICW
4.4
ICW
4.0
Short
Average
Tall
Use 70% RED Proportion
Calculating Tooth Widths
35.6------ = 8.1mm CI4.4
8.1*0.7= 5.7mm LI
5.7*0.7= 4.0mm C
35.6mm
Use 78% W/L Ratio
Calculating Central Incisor Length
35.6------ = 8.1mm CI4.4
8.1/0.78= 10.4mm CI
35.6mm
8.1mm10.4m
m
Post-Treatment
Short Average Tall
80% RED 70% RED 62% RED
Relating the Size of the Teeth to the FaceRelating the Size of the Teeth to the Face
Short Average Tall
80% RED 70% RED 62% RED
Relating the Size of the Teeth to the Face
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
Different RED Proportions can be used according to desired tooth length
Different RED Proportions can be used according to desired tooth length
Methods to Gain Favorable Width/Length Ratio in Short Teeth
Methods to Gain Favorable Width/Length Ratio in Short Teeth
Adding Length to Central Incisor allows Smaller RED Proportion
Adding Length to Central Incisor allows Smaller RED Proportion
Missing Lateral Incisors Replaced by Maryland bridges
“My bridges are loose and my front teeth hurt.”
Tooth size is too small
Lateral Smile Views
Radiographic Evaluation revealed that #8-9 require endodontic root canal therapy
De-Bonded Metal Abutments to Centrals
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
DETERMINE DESIRED RELATIVE TOOTH HEIGHT
Patient exhibits Short Tooth Length
…BUT Average Facial Height
PRE-OPERATIVE MEASUREMENTS
MEASURE INTERCANINE WIDTH (ICW)
Measure available ICW space
37.6 mm
CALCULATE CENTRAL INCISOR WIDTH (CIW)
Divide ICW by divisor for average tooth height to determine CIW
ICW/divisor=CIW37.6/4.4=CIW8.5=CIW
37.6 mm
CALCULATE LATERAL INCISOR WIDTH (LIW)
Multiply CIW X RED Proportion for average length teeth-70% RED (0.7)
CIW*RED=LIW8.5*0.7=LIW6.0=LIW
CALCULATE CANINE WIDTH (CW)
Multiply LIW X RED Proportion for average length teeth-70% RED (0.7)
LIW*RED=CW6.0*0.7=LIW4.2=CW
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
CALCULATE CENTRAL INCISOR WIDTH (CIL)
Divide CIW by Desired W/L Ratio (0.78) to determine CIL
CIW/0.78=CIL8.6/0.78=CIL11.0=CIL
Incisal Edge Determinants
• Esthetics
• Phonetics
• Anterior guidance / Occlusion
Lengthen incisal edge #9 -0.5mm
Incisal Edge Determinants
• Esthetics
• Phonetics
• Anterior guidance / Occlusion
Lengthen #9 - 2.5mm (0.5mm on incisal & 2.0mm at cervical
Ideal Tooth Proportions Using the RED proportion
Pre-Operative Measurements
Desired Measurements
No Periodontal Surgery Original Proportions Periodontal Surgery RED Proportions
• Lengthen #9 2.5mm to 11mm• Widen Central Incisors to allow
70% RED Proportion• Shift midline slightly to left
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
AfterPost Perio Surgery“I want a Model Smile”
CALCULATE W/H RATIOOF CENTRAL INCISORS
7.4 / 9.0 = 0.82 or 82%
CALCULATERED PROPORTIONS
1.0 / 4.5 = 0.22 or 22%
CALCULATERED PROPORTIONS
4.5 / 5.0 = 0.9 or 90%
• Esthetics
• Phonetics
• Anterior guidance Occlusion
DESIRED INCISAL EDGE POSITION
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
Determine ideal Central Incisor Width for 70% RED Proportion
33.4CENTRAL INCISOR WIDTH = -------------------------
4.4
CENTRAL INCISOR WIDTH = 7.6mm
Determining ideal Central Incisor Length for 78% W/L Ratio
7.6CENTRAL INCISOR LENGTH = -------------------------
0.78
CENTRAL INCISOR LENGTH = 9.8mm
Determining Maxillary Anterior Tooth Widths for 70% RED Proportion
CIW*RED=LIW
7.6*0.7=5.3=LIW
LIW*RED=CW
5.3*0.7=3.7=CW
FIVE
Pre-Treatment and Desired Tooth Dimensions
FIVE
Pre-Treatment and Desired Tooth Dimensions Treatment & Blueprint
Imaged without Perio Surgery
-
Daniel H Ward DDS
Treatment & Blueprint
Imaged with Perio Surgery
Treatment & Blueprint
1 Month Post Perio Surgery
Treatment & Blueprint
2 Weeks post-treatment
AfterBefore
REMEMBERREMEMBER
The Math is Important