Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

22

Transcript of Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

Page 1: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.
Page 2: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

Amanda Bevan

26 November 2011

Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875

Page 3: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

3

The Six Clerks Office, Chancery Lane [1622-1778]

Page 4: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

4

Stone Buildings, Lincoln’s Inn 1778-1882

Page 5: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

5

Court of Chancery goes back to 1380s

C 1 – 1383-1558:

75,000 detailed descriptions searchable when our online catalogue was launched in 2001

Page 6: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

Chancery Pleadings, 1558-1875

C 2- C 17 1,027,000 sets of pleadings

In 2001

half - no description in the catalogue

half - poor description in the catalogue

Page 7: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

25

2525

25In 2011:

a quarter - no description

a quarter - good description

a quarter - poor description

a quarter - in progress

Page 8: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

8

10 years intermittent work – 2 years on something completely different

• data problems

• data structure problems

• software problems

• authenticity v searchability problems

• resource problems

• the ‘Why would anyone look at Chancery?’ problem

Page 9: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

9

Family Names of the United Kingdom (FaNUK)

Discovery

PROCAT Editorial

Page 10: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

10

C 2 in progress C 3 on catalogue(thanks to the Friends)

C 4 on catalogue(thanks to Alistair Hanson)

Page 11: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

11

C 5 - in progress

C 6 - 80% in

C 7-C 10- still to do

Page 12: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

12

C 11 1714-1758

25% detailed (thanks to volunteers)

75% in with a brief description(thanks to Jone’s team)

Page 13: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

13

1801-1875All in with a brief description: being improved by staff and volunteers

Page 14: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

14

After 1875:

Chancery becomes the Chancery Division of the Supreme Court

… and we have an even worse set of problems

Page 15: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

15

What can you find …ideally …? Short title

Document type

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Subject and place

A code

Page 16: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

16

Short titles change Document type helps you tie cases together

Short title and document type: 1558-1875

Page 17: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

17

Subject or place and most parties: 1558-1714

Page 18: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

18

Page 19: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

19

1714-1758 (C 11)

Names Occupations

Residence

Not subject

Page 20: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

20

1801-1875

Names, relations.

Some idea of place.

No subjects.

Page 21: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

21

Codes to search by ….

SFP sole female plaintiffJFP joint female plaintiffsCBP corporate body plaintiffUBP unincorporate body plaintiff

Page 22: Amanda Bevan 26 November 2011 Opening up Chancery litigation, 1558-1875.

22

And the last problem …

‘Why would anyone look at Chancery?’

… because it gives us all the chance to uncover the worries and concerns of people in the past …