All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

37
1 Jack Poller, ESG Analyst The All-Flash Versus Hybrid Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price May 2016 Patric Chang, Senior Director, SanDisk Jase McCarty, Sr Technical Marketing Architect, VMware

Transcript of All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

Page 1: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

1

Jack Poller, ESG Analyst

The All-Flash Versus Hybrid Virtual SAN™:

Performance vs. PriceMay 2016

Patric Chang, Senior Director, SanDisk

Jase McCarty, Sr Technical Marketing Architect, VMware

Page 2: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

2

Forward Looking StatementDuring our meeting today we will make forward-looking statements. Any statement that refers to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances

is a forward-looking statement, including those relating to market growth, industry trends, future products, product performance and product capabilities. This presentation also contains forward-looking statements attributed to third parties, which reflect their projections as of the date of issuance.

Actual results may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements due to a number of risks and uncertainties, including the factors detailed under the caption “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in the documents we file from time to time with the SEC, including our annual and quarterly reports.

We undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof or as of the date of issuance by a third party, as the case may be.

Page 3: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

3

Speakers OverviewPatric Chang, Sr Director, Strategic Partner Ecosystems, Western DigitalPatric Chang works in SanDisk’s Strategic Partner Ecosystems. He has deep experience in solution and business development in virtualization, End User computing or Virtual Desktop Infrastructure and cloud computing. Patric has broad industry experience in working with leading ISVs and OEMs to utilize flash, server, storage and networking products for enterprise applications, IaaS, SaaS and other cloud solutions. Patric Chang has spoken at numerous leading trade shows and events including various VMUGs, VMworld and Oracle Open World.

Jack Poller, Sr Lab Analyst, Enterprise Strategy Group (ESG)As a Lab Analyst at Enterprise Strategy Group, Jack Poller provides independent, hands-on validation and analysis of emerging IT hardware and software products including software-defined networking and storage, virtualization, security, and IT systems management. Jack brings more than 25 years of IT industry experience to his role. Prior to joining ESG, he spent 10 years as a marketing consultant for storage and networking startups. Jack’s formative years in the industry were spent as a software and hardware engineer, developing 3D graphics, storage and networking chips and systems at vendors like Novel, NeTpower, Chromatic Research, Rendition, and Silverback Systems. Jack received a BSc in Applied Math and Computer Science from Carnegie Mellon University, and an MBA from the Leavy School of Business at Santa Clara University.

Jase McCarty, Staff Technical Marketing Architect, VMware StorageJase McCarty has a diverse history in technology over the past 25 years. As a customer, he has worked in academics, health insurance, financials, and the military, in positions ranging from administration, architecture, web development, instruction, & training. Previous to coming to VMware, he was a vSpecialist at EMC, supporting the Federal Government. He has co-authored two books on VMware virtualization, maintains a technical blog at jasemccarty.com, and is active on Twitter as @jasemccarty.

Page 4: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

4

Topics Covered Today

All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price – Jack Poller

Key features and highlights of Virtual SAN – Jase McCarty SanDisk® Flash Product Portfolio and Reference Architectures

for Virtual SAN – Patric Chang Q&A

Page 5: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

5

Optimize VMware Virtual SAN 6 with SanDisk SSDs – ESG Lab Report

5

Page 6: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

6

Storage Challenges

Device management

Power and cooling costs

Need to support growing virtual server environments

Running out of physical space

Management, optimization and au-tomation of data placement

Data migration

Staff costs

Data protection (e.g. backup/re-covery, etc.)

Rapid data growth rate

Hardware costs

18%

18%

20%

20%

20%

23%

23%

26%

26%

27%

5%

6%

5%

6%

4%

4%

6%

8%

8%

7%

In general, what would you say are your organization’s biggest challenges in terms of its stor-age environment? Which would you characterize as the primary storage challenge for your

organization? (Percent of respondents, N=373, top ten shown)

Primary storage challenge

Source: ESG Research Report, 2015 Data Storage Market Trends, October 2015 © 2016 by The Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc.

Page 7: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

7

Top 10 IT Priorities

Source: ESG Research Report, 2015 Data Storage Market Trends, October 2015 © 2016 by The Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc.

Business continuity/disaster recovery programs

Improving collaboration capabilities

Desktop virtualization

Increasing use of server virtualization

Major application deployments or upgrades

Improving data backup and recovery

Data integration

Managing data growth

Business intelligence/data analytics initiatives

Cybersecurity initiatives

18%

19%

20%

20%

20%

20%

21%

22%

23%

37%

Top 10 most important IT priorities over the next 12 months. (Percent of re-spondents, N=633, ten responses accepted)

Page 8: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

8

VMware Virtual SAN

3—64 NodesVMware VSAN

Virtual Data Store

VirtualMachines

VMware VSAN 6Hyper-Converged

Infrastructure

Page 9: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

9

SanDisk® Optimus SSDs

Page 10: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

10

Test Bed

VMware VSANVirtual Data Store

8 Virtual Machines2 per Physical Server

4 Industry Standard ServersVMware VSAN 6

SQL ServerAll-FlashHybrid

Page 11: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

11

Hybrid All Flash0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

1,702,776

2,542,760

HammerDB Performance ResultsVMware VSAN with SanDisk SSDs

New

Ord

ers p

er M

inut

e (N

OPM

)

49%

Test Results: Performance NOPMs

Page 12: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

12

Hybrid All Flash0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

HammerDB Results for Each Individual VMVMware VSAN with SanDisk SSDs

New

Ord

ers p

er M

inut

e (N

OPM

)

Test Results: NOPMs for each VM

Page 13: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

13

Hybrid All Flash0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.20

0.14

HammerDB Price/Performance: $/New Orders Per MinuteVMware VSAN with SanDisk SSDs

$ / N

ew O

rder

s Per

Min

ute

($/N

OPM

)

Test Results: Price/Performance

Page 14: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

14

Why This Matters Storage performance can be a limiting factor in database and virtual environments

A hybrid four-node Virtual SAN cluster with SanDisk SSDs delivered 1,702,776 new orders per minute

An all-flash four-node Virtual SAN cluster with SanDisk SSDs delivered 2,542,760 new orders per minute

The all-flash configuration delivered 49% better performance and 26% better price/performance

Higher performance means less hardware, saving on power, cooling and application software licensing© 2016 by The Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc.

Page 15: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

15

Key features and highlights of Virtual SAN

15

Page 16: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

Infrastructure Complexity

• Purpose-built hardware requiring specialized skills

• Complex management and scaling with poor integration

• Challenging to size for VDI

Traditional Infrastructure Hyper-Converged Infrastructure

• Simple storage deployed on commodity x86 servers

• Pay-as-you-grow scaling• High, predictable performance• Policy based storage

IT Shift Virtual SAN+ vSphere + Horizon

Page 17: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

VMware HCI: A Single, Seamlessly Integrated Software Layer

17

Scale-OutHyper-Converged

Solution

• Compute, storage, networking delivered as software

• Tightly integrated software stack

• Elastic Scale-Out across x86 building blocks

Software

Software

• Convergence of physical storage on x86 hardware

• Building-block approach

Hardware

Virtual SAN

vSphere

Networking

Page 18: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

VMware Virtual SAN: Radically Simple Storage

18

Hyper-Converged Storage Designed for Virtual Machines

vSphere + Virtual SAN…

• Resource efficient hyperconverged solution

• Enterprise-level availability, scalability and performance on standard x86 servers

• Richest set of deployment options

• Deeply integrated with the VMware stack

• All-flash and hybrid configurations

• Scales from 2 to 64 nodes

• Policy-based SLA automation

Overview

Hard disksSSDHard disks

SSDHard disks

SSD

Virtual SAN Datastore

Page 19: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

Virtual SAN Simplifies And Automates Storage Management

19

Per-VM Storage Service Levels From a Single Self-tuning Datastore

Storage Policy-Based Management

Virtual SAN Shared

Datastore

vSphere + Virtual SAN

SLAs

Software Automates Control of Service Levels

No more LUNs/Volumes!

Policies Set Basedon Application Needs

Capacity

Performance

Availability

Per VM Storage Policies

Page 20: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

20

Virtual SAN Architecture

• Minimum of 3 hosts in a cluster configuration or 2 hosts + witness

• All 3 host must contribute storage

• Recommended that hosts are configured with similar hardware

• Hosts: Scales up to 64

• Disks: Locally attached storageo Hybrid: Magnetic disks and flash deviceso All-Flash: Flash devices only

• Networko 1GB Ethernet ORo 10GB Ethernet (preferred)

• “Witness” component (only metadata) acts as tie-breaker during availability decisionsesxi-01 esxi-02 esxi-03

VSAN network

vSphere Cluster

REPLICA-1 REPLICA-2

VSAN datastore

Witness

Page 21: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

21

Tiered All-Flash and Hybrid Options

Caching

DataPersistenceVirtual

SAN

All-Flash

100K IOPS per Host+

sub-millisecond latency

Writes cached first,Reads from capacity tier

Capacity TierFlash Devices

Reads primarily from capacity tier

SSD PCIe NVMe

Hybrid

40K IOPS per Host

Read and Write Cache

Capacity TierSAS / NL-SAS / SATA

SSD PCIe NVMe

Page 22: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

Virtual SAN Delivers 6-Nines, Enterprise-Class Availability

22

99.9999%Availability

• With FTT=2 VSAN delivers 6x9s protection less than 32 seconds of downtime/year

• Typical hardware components provides about 2x9s availability level (3.65 days downtime/year)

• Virtual SAN exponentially increases the availability through mirroring across the cluster

• With default availability policy, Virtual SAN delivers 5x9s protection less than 5 minutes of downtime/year

• Assign level of availability on a per-VM basis and adjust on the fly

Available with 2 Failures

<32 sec

Page 23: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

Unprecedented Customer Momentum

3500+ Customers in the first 24 months

In my experience VMware solutions are rock solid…we’re ready to nearly double our VSAN deployment.

“”

It really did work as advertised…the fact that I have been able to set it and forget it is huge!

“”

Page 24: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

Why Customers Love Virtual SAN

CHOICE

Choose preferred vendorMeet exact needs, no waste

SIMPLICITY

2-click provisioningIntegrated workflows

Policy-driven management

COST

50% TCO savingsSimple to operate

and learn

$

3

PERFORMANCEAND SCALABILITY

1.5 - 5x faster than competitorsPredictable, elastic scaling

Page 25: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

VMware Virtual SAN 6.2 Ready For All vSphere Workloads

VMware vSphere + Virtual SAN

End User Computing Test/Dev

ROBOStagingManagementDMZ

BusinessCritical Apps DR / DA

Best storage for VMs

Optimized for vSphere

Enterprise-class resiliency

Business critical app ready

Page 26: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

26

SanDisk Certified Products for Virtual SAN and Reference Architectures – Patric Chang

26

Page 27: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

27

Flash Family

Fusion ioMemory™ SX350, PX600

Lighting Ascend™, Eco™ and Ultra™ Gen

II

Optimus Ascend ™ Gen II

Optimus Eco™, Optimus MAX™

CloudSpeed, Ascend™, Eco™ and Ultra™

Storage Tier

Caching

Caching, Capacity

Caching, Capacity

Capacity

Capacity, Caching

Capacities

1.0TB - 6.4TB

200GB - 1.6TB

200GB - 1.6TB

2TB, 4TB

100GB - 800GB, 240GB - 960GB

Industry’s Broadest Portfolio For Virtual SAN 6Device Types

PCIe

SAS

SATA

SAS

SAS

Performance

Class F

Class E

Class E

Class E, C

Class C, C, D

Page 28: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

28

Reference Architectures with SanDisk Enterprise Flash1 OEM Partner Solution Proof Point Flash-Enabled By

Optimus Ascend & Optimus MAX on Lenovo System X 3650 M5 Servers

3.08 Million New Orders Per Minute1 using HammerDB and SQL Server 2014 on All-Flash 4-node Virtual SAN

Lightning Ascend and Eco Gen. II on Dell R730 Gen13 Servers

800 Horizon View 6 Desktops using Login VSI on All-Flash 4-node Virtual SAN

Lightning Ascend and Eco Gen. II on Dell R730 Gen13 Servers

Tested for Online Transaction Processing using HammerDB and Oracle 12c on All-Flash 4-node Virtual SAN

Fusion ioMemory (PCIe) on HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 Servers

300 Horizon View 6 Desktops on 3-node Hybrid Virtual SAN tested using VMware View Planner

Optimus Ascend & Optimus MAX on Lenovo System X 3650 M5 Servers

Business Critical Applications and VDI DesktopsVDI tested using VMware Horizon View Planneron All-Flash 4-node Virtual SAN

Lightning Ascend and Eco Gen. II on Dell FX2 Servers

1.18 Million Orders Per Minute using DVD Store Version 2.1 and All-Flash 4-node Virtual SAN

1 Reference Architectures developed with VMware and our OEM Partners in VSAN Smart Play directory here.

Page 29: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

29

Business Critical Application Solution with All-Flash Virtual SANHigh performance and low cost solution for Business Critical Applications and Databases

3.08 Million New Orders Per Minute (NOPMs) on 4-Node Virtual SAN Cluster1

1 Based on Performance tests conducted by SanDisk using HammerDB and SQL Server Database.

Disk Group 2

4 node VSAN Cluster for OLTP Workload

vSphere 6.0 and Virtual SAN 6.0

SQL

Disk Group 1

Disk Group 2Disk

Group 1

Disk Group 2Disk

Group 1

Disk Group 2Disk

Group 1

Node 4Node 3Node 2Node 1

SQL

SQL SQL SQL

SQL SQL SQLServer Platform 4 Nodes of Lenovo System X 3650 M5 series servers 2 Disk Groups per node (1:2)

Caching: SanDisk Optimus Ascend Gen II 6G SAS Drive (800 GB) Capacity: SanDisk Optimus Max SAS Drive (4.0 TB)

Disk Controller: M5210 RAID ControllerVM Configuration 16 vCPU and 96 GB RAM 8 VMs – each node running 2 VMs and 2 database instances 10 disk files @ 800GB Total for each VM (OS 100GB & DB 800GB & Log 100GB), Software Virtual SAN 6.0 vSphere 6, vCenter Server 6 SQL Server 2014 Standard without SA HammerDB - OLTP 5000 Warehouse workload

Page 30: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

30

Business Critical Application Solution and VDI with SupermicroHigh performance and low cost solution for Business Critical Applications and VDI Desktops

128 TB of Raw Flash Capacity in 4-Node VSAN Cluster

Disk Group 2

4 node VSAN Cluster for OLTP Workload

vSphere 6.0 and Virtual SAN 6.0

Disk Group 1

Disk Group 2Disk

Group 1

Disk Group 2Disk

Group 1

Disk Group 2Disk

Group 1

Node 4Node 3Node 2Node 1

Server Platform 4 Nodes of TwinPro2 Server w/3008 8 E5-2670V3 CPUs per node 1024GB Memory per node 64TB Raw Flash Capacity per node

4 Disk Groups per node (1:2) Caching: SanDisk Optimus Ascend Gen II 6G SAS Drive (800 GB) Capacity: SanDisk Optimus Max SAS Drive (4.0 TB)

Disk Controller: SMC3008 12GB SAS/HBA/2Software Virtual SAN 6.0 vSphere 6 vCenter Server 6

Page 31: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

31

Virtual SAN 6 Ready Nodes with SanDisk Enterprise Flash1 Partner Certified VSAN Ready Nodes Reference Architecture Flash-Enabled By

Optimus Ascend & Optimus MAX on Lenovo System X M5 Servers:AF-6: Lenovo System x3550/x3650 M5, 15.3TB per nodeAF-8: Lenovo System x3650 M5, 30.7TB per node

3.08 Million New Orders Per Minute4 using HammerDB and SQL Server 2014 on All-Flash 4-node Virtual SAN

Optimus Ascend & Optimus MAX on Supermicro Servers: AF-6: SMC TwinPro2 2U, 32TB per node

730 Horizon View 6 VDI Desktops5

on All-Flash 4-node Virtual SAN tested using VMware Horizon View Planner

Fusion ioMemory on HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 Servers: HY-8 Series DL360 Gen9 VDI 12TB per node

300 Horizon View 6 Desktops3 on 3-node Hybrid Virtual SAN tested using VMware View Planner

With Lightning II on Dell FX2 Platform:AF-6: DELL FX2 FC430, 4-Nodes, 8TB per NodeAF-6: DELL FX2 FC630, 3-Nodes, 8TB per NodeAF-6: DELL FX2 FC830, 3-Nodes, 8TB per NodeAF-8: DELL FX2 FC630, 3-Nodes, 12TB per NodeAF-8: DELL FX2 FC830, 3-Nodes, 12TB per Node

1.18 Million Orders Per Minute2 using DVD Store Version 2.1 and All-Flash 4-node Virtual SAN

Lightning Ascend on Dell R730 Gen13 Servers: HY-6: DELL 730xd, 8TB Per Node

Horizon View 6 Desktopsusing Login VSI on All-Flash 4-node Virtual SAN

1 Posted on VMware Compatibility Guide for Virtual SAN here.

Page 32: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

32

All-Flash Virtual SAN

32

Page 33: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

Unprecedented Customer Momentum

3500+ Customers in the first 24 months

In my experience VMware solutions are rock solid…we’re ready to nearly double our VSAN deployment.

“”

It really did work as advertised…the fact that I have been able to set it and forget it is huge!

“”

Page 34: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

34

Oregon State University: High Performance for VDI with Budget-friendly Scaling

Corvallis, OregonAcademic Institution 26,000 students

Challenge• Storage overburdened by VDI workloads

• User login took over 20 minutes during peak times

• Recomposing VDI environment took 10+ hours

• Limited storage budget

Solution

• Virtual SAN on industry standard x86 servers

Results

• Drastically better performance: user login time reduced from 20 minutes to 1 minute

• Increased VDI scale: support 170+ additional users on existing servers/network

• Simplified management: resetting desktops reduced from 10 hours to <2 hours

• Lower cost and ease of scale: lowered acquisition costs by 75% and enabled easier scaling for future needs

Boot Time20x

Faster

VDI Density6x

Greater

Page 35: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

35

Q&A

Page 36: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

36

Patric Chang [email protected]+1-408-597-1442

Jase McCarty [email protected]@jasemccarty

Customer OfferApply for VSAN Assessment now: http://tinyurl.com/vsan-assessment

Or contact us to apply for a free Proof of Concept (POC) or other additional information. We’re here to help.

Page 37: All-Flash Versus Hybrid VMware Virtual SAN™: Performance vs. Price

37

© 2016 Western Digital Corporation or its affiliates. All rights reserved. SanDisk and the SanDisk logo are trademarks of Western Digital Corporation or its affiliates, registered in the U.S. and other countries. Fusion ioMemory, Optimus, Lightning and CloudSpeed are a trademark of Western Digital Corporation or its affiliates. Other brand names mentioned herein are for identification purposes only and may be the trademark(s) of their respective holder(s).