AlkaSave methodology & approach

77
PERSPECTIVES AND OPPORTUNITIES TO CLOSE THE SANITATION LOOP IN RURAL CAMBODIA Potential solutions to integrate public health and agriculture through lime Brian Chhor & Katie Nelson Stanford Gap for Good, XSEED September 2012

Transcript of AlkaSave methodology & approach

Page 1: AlkaSave methodology & approach

PERSPECTIVES AND OPPORTUNITIES TO CLOSE THE SANITATION LOOP IN R URAL CAMBODIA

Potential solutions to integrate public health and agriculture through lime

Brian Chhor & Katie Nelson

Stanford Gap for Good, XSEED

September 2012

Page 2: AlkaSave methodology & approach

OUTLINE

1. Background

2. Methodology

3. Technical feasibility

4. iDE’s operational viability

5. Consumer desirability

6. Business models

7. Implementation plan

Page 3: AlkaSave methodology & approach

BA

CK

GR

OU

ND

PROJECT BACKGROUND

Based on last summer's research, tying agricultural value to human waste could provide incentive to

change sanitation practices.

Page 4: AlkaSave methodology & approach

BA

CK

GR

OU

ND

SUMMER OBJECTIVES

Explore opportunities to close the sanitation loop in rural Cambodia:

» Exploring existing sanitation systems worldwide

» Developing an understanding of the Cambodian context

» Testing concepts in the field

Page 5: AlkaSave methodology & approach

METH

OD

OLO

GYINITIAL EXPLORATION OF

SANITATIONTREATMENT OPTIONS:

CHEMICALAlkalineUltravioletChlorine

STEP 1: Research

BIOLOGICALBiodigestionVermicultureComposting

AerobicAnaerobic

PHYSICALPasteurizationShearingFilter

Page 6: AlkaSave methodology & approach

METH

OD

OLO

GY

Page 7: AlkaSave methodology & approach

METH

OD

OLO

GY

Page 8: AlkaSave methodology & approach

METH

OD

OLO

GY

STEP 2: Examine technical feasibility of lime

» Safety

» Efficacy

» Literature review

STEP 3: Operational viability» iDE’s existing resources

» Supply chain

STEP 4: Consumer desirability » Field visits to Kandal, Svai Rieng (x2)

» 7 FBAs, 5 farmers, 3 non-farmers, 1 village chief

» iDE's SVR Chief Agronomist, Operations Manager, field staff

» Business model comparison

Page 9: AlkaSave methodology & approach

TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY

Page 10: AlkaSave methodology & approach

TECH

NIC

AL FEA

SIBILITY

Chemical Process

Page 11: AlkaSave methodology & approach

TECH

NIC

AL FEA

SIBILITY

Types of Lime

CaCO3

(Limestone)

• Easiest and safest to handle

• Replenishes calcium in soils

• Used in toothpaste, cereal, antacids

• When burned (calcination), produces CaO

CaO

(Quicklime)

• Will spontaneously react with CO2 and H2O in air, can ignite combustible materials

• Can reach temp of 100 C

• Dries and pasteurizes sludge, raises pH

• Causes severe burns when inhaled or placed in contact with moist skin or eyes.

Ca(OH)2

(Hydrated Lime)

•Relatively stable compared to CaO

•Does not generate heat,raises pH to 12

•Good for building and mortar- aggregate and stabilizer

•Good for white washing, pickling, and deodorizing animal waste

•Unprotected exposure to Ca(OH)2 should be limited. It can cause severe skin irritation, chemical burns, blindness, or lung damage.

Page 12: AlkaSave methodology & approach

TECH

NIC

AL FEA

SIBILITY

Types of Lime

CaCO3

(Limestone)

• Easiest and safest to handle

• Replenishes calcium in soils

• Used in toothpaste, cereal, antacids

• When burned (calcination), produces CaO

CaO

(Quicklime)

• Will spontaneously react with CO2 and H2O in air, can ignite combustible materials

• Can reach temp of 100 C

• Dries and pasteurizes sludge, raises pH

• Causes severe burns when inhaled or placed in contact with moist skin or eyes.

Ca(OH)2

(Hydrated Lime)

•Relatively stable compared to CaO

•Does not generate heat,raises pH to 12

•Good for building and mortar- aggregate and stabilizer

•Good for white washing, pickling, and deodorizing animal waste

•Unprotected exposure to Ca(OH)2 should be limited. It can cause severe skin irritation, chemical burns, blindness, or lung damage.

Page 13: AlkaSave methodology & approach

TECH

NIC

AL FEA

SIBILITY

Lime in Sanitation

» High pH levels destroy and prevent regrowth of pathogens

» Vector attraction barrier prevents insect infection of waste

» Reduce heavy metal content

» Destruction of odors

Page 14: AlkaSave methodology & approach

TECH

NIC

AL FEA

SIBILITY

» Increased pH improves acidic soil

» Classified as a “soil amendment,” not a fertilizer

Improves soil quality over time rather than having a direct impact

on short-term crop growth

» Decreased insect and pest attraction

» Increases soil permeability and water percolation

» Improves conditions for nitrogen-fixing bacteria

» Captures phosphates and ammonia

Lime in Agriculture

Page 15: AlkaSave methodology & approach

TECH

NIC

AL FEA

SIBILITY

In the Literature

Page 16: AlkaSave methodology & approach

TECH

NIC

AL FEA

SIBILITY

Fungi and Pathogens Post-Treatment

Page 17: AlkaSave methodology & approach

TECH

NIC

AL FEA

SIBILITY

Chemical Assay Post-Treatment

Page 18: AlkaSave methodology & approach

Lime

FlocculationpH Testing with Ca(OH)2

TECH

NIC

AL FEA

SIBILITY

Page 19: AlkaSave methodology & approach

TECH

NIC

AL FEA

SIBILITY

Mixing Devices:Latrine-level and toilet

level

Page 20: AlkaSave methodology & approach

TECH

NIC

AL FEA

SIBILITY

Lime Storage and Dispenser

Page 21: AlkaSave methodology & approach

TECH

NIC

AL FEA

SIBILITY

KEY POINTS:

» Chemically, lime is well adapted for both:

Sanitation purposes : kills pathogens, insect attraction barrier, odor reduction

Agricultural purposes: increased pH and soil permeability, phosphate and ammonia fixing, pest reduction

» Calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) is the most promising form

Safer than CaO and more alkaline than CaCO3

» Lime needs to be adequately mixed with waste to ensure

sterilization

Page 22: AlkaSave methodology & approach

OPERATIONAL VIABILITY

Page 23: AlkaSave methodology & approach

OP

ERA

TION

AL V

IAB

ILITY

iDE’s Current Use of Lime

» Sold through FBA network

5-10% of overall sales

Sales have doubled in past year

Sold mainly to NGOs

» Focused on vegetable plots

» Pilot test:

Recommendation was 300-500 kg/hectare.

In pilot test (1 HH), used 300 kg on 1 hectare.

Rice yield increased from 1 ton/hectare to 3.5 ton/hectare

Page 24: AlkaSave methodology & approach

OP

ERA

TION

AL V

IAB

ILITY

iDE’s LIME SUPPLY CHAIN

?Lime is sourced from Vietnam, but the original provenance is unknown. Perhaps China?

Page 25: AlkaSave methodology & approach

OP

ERA

TION

AL V

IAB

ILITY

iDE’s LIME SUPPLY CHAIN

?

iDE purchases lime from across the border, and transports to Svay Rieng

Lors Thmey

Page 26: AlkaSave methodology & approach

OP

ERA

TION

AL V

IAB

ILITY

iDE’s LIME SUPPLY CHAIN

?

Lors Thmey distributes to FBAs and sells to NGOs

Lors Thmey

NGOsDon BoscoCADFiDE partnersAVILUSAID

Page 27: AlkaSave methodology & approach

OP

ERA

TION

AL V

IAB

ILITY

iDE’s LIME SUPPLY CHAIN

?

FBAs use the lime themselves and sell to famers in small quantities

Lors Thmey

NGOsDon BoscoCADFiDE partnersAVILUSAID

Page 28: AlkaSave methodology & approach

OP

ERA

TION

AL V

IAB

ILITY

Problems with existing supply chain

» Inefficient sourcing and distribution

» Instability of existing source

» Lack of quality control

Page 29: AlkaSave methodology & approach

OP

ERA

TION

AL V

IAB

ILITY

Household costs & Alternate sourcing

Amount of Ca(OH)2 to get pH 11.5:1 teaspoon lime/ gal waste

(0.528 teaspoon/ 2L flush)

Amount of Ca(OH)2 per household per year:-5 people per household

-one flush per person per day

-Density Ca(OH)2 = 2.211 g/cm3

23.1511 lb per household

per year

Cost of Ca(OH)2 to household:

-US $90-200 / Metric Ton (via Lianyungang Jialei

International Trade Co., Ltd)

-Avg. $145 / metric ton ($0.0658 /lb)

-Ca(OH)2 from Thailand and Kampot (2008)

-$110-120 / metric ton ($0.0521 /lb)

-Ca(OH)2 from Battambang

-$90 / metric ton ($0.0408 /lb)

$0.94 per household per

year

Page 30: AlkaSave methodology & approach

OP

ERA

TION

AL

VIA

BILITY

KEY POINTS:

» iDE currently uses lime and has a full supply chain already built around it

» Supply chain should be reexamined for inefficiencies and quality control

» Most customers are repeat buyers

» The cost per household of a lime distribution scheme should cost less than $3/HH/year

Page 31: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CONSUMER DESIRABILITY

Page 32: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITY

Central question:

Is alkaline stabilization of waste viable in the Cambodian context?

» Relevant information about existing agricultural practices and

preferences

» Understanding of waste management and sanitation norms

» Acceptability of central design concept

Page 33: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITY

USER INSIGHTS

Page 34: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYFARMING: A Lifestyle

"When the wind comes, the rice looks like it's dancing.”

Page 35: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYFARMING: A Necessity

“There is no point in growing my own cucumbers when I can get them for cheaper at the market."

Page 36: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITY"Everything is challenging. Some people fail once or twice and then give up. Other people fail over and over again until they get it right.“

Page 37: AlkaSave methodology & approach

FARMING

INSIGHT:

While the FBAs need to use the product themselves and observe the proof of its efficacy, farmers are willing to listen to FBAs recommendations based on their reputation alone.

Page 38: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYFARMING

INSIGHT:

FBAs are the thought leaders of the farming community, and advocate high inputs for high yields. Those farmers that ascribe to this philosophy are passionate about farming; those who do not are not willing to expend the effort or money to make improvements.

Page 39: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYFARMING

DESIGN PRINCIPLE:

Because FBAs are early adopters who are committed to learning new techniques to improve their farming, they should be the target of any new agricultural product.

Page 40: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYFRAMEWORKS FOR UNDERSTANDING: Chemicals

“People put chemicals in everything now, and we have shorter lives because of it."

Page 41: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYFRAMEWORKS FOR UNDERSTANDING: Mechanization

“Before, we peeled rice by hand, now a machine does it."

Page 42: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYFRAMEWORKS FOR UNDERSTANDING

INSIGHT:

Increased reliance on chemical and mechanical agricultural technology disconnects both farmers and consumers from the way that crops are being grown, resulting in suspicion and misunderstanding.

Page 43: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYFRAMEWORKS FOR UNDERSTANDING: Chemicals

"It's like MSG; before, we put a little on our food and it tasted good. Now we use a lot and it doesn’t taste any better.“

Page 44: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYFRAMEWORKS FOR UNDERSTANDING: Chemical Additives

Chemicals make “the ground hard" and "the rice red,” but “it’s good for the crops.”

Page 45: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYFRAMEWORKS FOR UNDERSTANDING: Organic Additives

Organic fertilizer makes "the rice white" and "the soil loose.”

Page 46: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYFRAMEWORKS FOR UNDERSTANDING

INSIGHT:

Farmers have a hard time reconciling the negative effects chemicals have on the environment with the increased quality of yields.

Page 47: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYFRAMEWORKS FOR UNDERSTANDING

DESIGN PRINCIPLE:

Increase transparency in the growing process through education. Emphasize both the organic and home-made nature of the product.

Page 48: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYWASTE: Pol Pot

“It was like being forced to drink from a water hose until you overflowed and couldn’t take anymore. There is no room left for anything else. We are full, fed up.”

Page 49: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYWASTE: Disgust

“You would have us eat our own shit?!”

Page 50: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYWASTE

INSIGHT:

There is a strong aversion to using human waste as a fertilizer but people regularly use animal waste on their crops.

Page 51: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYWASTE

INSIGHT:

In trying to make full use of livestock, waste is seen as a consumable and valuable good. Humans, on the other hand, do not have the same association --so it is hard for people to see human excrement as anything more than unwanted waste.

Page 52: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYWASTE

INSIGHT:

People believe bacteria (and associated diseases) to be unique to human waste, and perhaps, unique among family members.

Page 53: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYWASTE: Rice vs. Vegetables

INSIGHT:

The difference in technique and use between rice and vegetables ‘shields’ farmers and consumers from the negative associations of human waste.

Page 54: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYWASTE

DESIGN PRINCIPLE:

We need to determine the acceptability of using a waste-based (but sterile) fertilizer on vegetables, and market it accordingly.

Page 55: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYWASTE

INSIGHT:

People use transformative techniques like composting and biodigesting to turn the waste into an acceptable product.

Page 56: AlkaSave methodology & approach

CO

NSU

MER

DESIR

AB

ILITYWASTE

DESIGN PRINCIPLE:

Our product needs to utilize this concept of transformation to break the connection between human waste and the treated fertilizer final product.

Page 57: AlkaSave methodology & approach

IMP

LEMEN

TATIO

N P

LAN

KEY POINTS:

Opportunities:

» FBAs as resource within village network

» Prevalence of lime usage

» Desire for "better" organic fertilizer

» Fear of bacteria

Challenges:

» Wariness of chemical additives

» Stigma associated with human waste

» Lack of motivation to change farming practices

Page 58: AlkaSave methodology & approach

BU

SINESS M

OD

EL INSIG

HTS

Page 59: AlkaSave methodology & approach

HO

USEH

OLD

MO

DEL

Cost:

$4 Container

+

$3/year

Page 60: AlkaSave methodology & approach

SERV

ICE M

OD

EL

Cost:

$10 or $15 per latrine empty

+

$1/km travelled for treatment

Page 61: AlkaSave methodology & approach

BU

SINESS IN

SIGH

TS

GENERAL INSIGHTS

» General excitement

Odor elimination

Yield increase

Bacteria sterilization

» Concerns about safety

» Concerns about adherence

» Reception varied depending on price point

Page 62: AlkaSave methodology & approach

BU

SINESS IN

SIGH

TS

» Could be integrated into daily chores.

» Adherence is a concern for children, who already don’t practice sanitary behaviors.

» People need to know that the product is safe to handle and apply.

HOUSEHOLD INSIGHTS

Page 63: AlkaSave methodology & approach

BU

SINESS IN

SIGH

TSOPERATIONAL INSIGHTS

DESIGN PRINCIPLE:

If safety and adherence concerns cannot be addressed, treatment needs to be centralized.

Page 64: AlkaSave methodology & approach

BU

SINESS IN

SIGH

TS

» Some farmers associate hiring external help with a loss of control over their farming practices (and outcomes).

» Even at an affordable price point, people considered the idea of hiring labor to be a luxury, and perhaps needlessly extravagant.

» Hiring someone to empty a latrine is less desirable than hiring someone to transport and apply waste to crops.

SERVICE INSIGHTS

Page 65: AlkaSave methodology & approach

BU

SINESS IN

SIGH

TS

» Several people we spoke to mentioned that human waste is currently commoditized in other countries, so there is precedent for establishing a Cambodian market.

» Fertilizer sourced from Thailand and Vietnam already contains human waste; consider a similar integration with fertilizer production in Cambodia.

COMMODITIZATION INSIGHTS & PRINCIPLES

Page 66: AlkaSave methodology & approach

BU

SINESS

MO

DELS

» People recognized the potential for mass production under this system, but were wary of using it themselves.

» Mass production of public waste would require secondary processing to break connection between waste and fertilizer product.

SCALING INSIGHTS & PRINCIPLES

Page 67: AlkaSave methodology & approach

BU

SINESSES M

OD

ELS

KEY POINTS:

Opportunities:

» Excitement about cheaper, organic fertilizerEspecially FBA buy-in

» Potential for scale-upExisting public waste streams

Analogous market

Challenges:

» Adherence

» Safety & toxicity

» Waste stigma

Page 68: AlkaSave methodology & approach

Technical Feasibility

» Appropriate sanitation use, due to pathogen & odor reduction

» Appropriate for agricultural use, due to positive effects of pH increase on soil

» Lime-sludge mix requires homogenization and 2 hours of treatment to sterilize

» Importance of containment of potentially harmful substance

Operational Viability» Existing supply chain,

customer base, sales support

» Need to explore novel sourcing options to ensure quality control, optimize cost savings

» Potential for low cost treatment solution

Consumer Desirability» Willingness to adopt

new practices, especially cheap, organic solutions- need for procedural transparency

» Stigma against human waste use on HH consumption crops

» Importance of transformationBusiness Models

» Potential for scale-up» Need for additional

processing to increase acceptability

» Concerns about safety, adherence in HH model

KEY MESSAGES:

Page 69: AlkaSave methodology & approach

IMP

LEMEN

TATIO

NP

LAN

Next steps:

Supply chain

Treatment protocol

Fertilizer efficacy

Operationmodel

Pilot test

Page 70: AlkaSave methodology & approach

IMP

LEMEN

TATIO

NP

LAN

Supply Chain

Determine the type of lime iDE is currently

using

Quality control of existing product

Explore Cambodian

sourcing opportunities

Page 71: AlkaSave methodology & approach

IMP

LEMEN

TATIO

N P

LAN

• Laboratory testing• Fecal coliform, helminths

• Field testing• Method required for

adequate mixing

• WHO protocol for crop use

Ensure sterilization

• Testing of existing product

• Establish use guidelines

Ensure safety

Treatment Protocol

Page 72: AlkaSave methodology & approach

IMP

LEMEN

TATIO

N P

LAN

Fertilizer efficacy

Determine NPK ratio for chemical

fertilizer cost comparison

Soil testingDemonstration

plot

Page 73: AlkaSave methodology & approach

IMP

LEMEN

TATIO

N P

LAN

Determine operational

model

Household

Build container

Consumer testing

AdherenceSpecific efficacy

Entrepreneurial

Determine key resources

Set pricing

Identify entrepreneurs

EducationDefine

services provided

Page 74: AlkaSave methodology & approach

IMP

LEMEN

TATIO

N P

LAN

Research question & study scope

Determine Sample size

Recruit FBAs as target users

Create small-scale latrines and demo plots

•Both rice and vegetables

Bacterial testing

Pilot Test

User feedback

Page 75: AlkaSave methodology & approach

AC

KN

OW

LEDG

EMEN

TS

Team EZPZJohn Thomas

Peter Mulligan

Stanford XSEED and d.SchoolMy Le

Joan Dorsey

Rita Lonhart

Marlo Dreissigacker

iDE CambodiaYi Wei

Pisith Lim

Philip Charlesworth

Lida Seng

Special thanks to:Elyse Marr

THANKS TO:

Page 76: AlkaSave methodology & approach

QUESTIONS

Page 77: AlkaSave methodology & approach

HU

MA

N W

ASTE