Alignment and Arthroplasty
27
25 iv 06 Alignment and Arthroplasty Justin Cobb Johann Henckel, Vijay Kannan, Farhad Iranpour, Robin Richards Imperial College London
description
Alignment and Arthroplasty. Justin Cobb Johann Henckel, Vijay Kannan, Farhad Iranpour, Robin Richards Imperial College London. Function is what really matters. ? The relationship with alignment ? We know that they are related But how directly? The rules are different For osteotomy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of Alignment and Arthroplasty
25 iv 06
Alignment and Arthroplasty
Justin Cobb Johann Henckel, Vijay Kannan, Farhad Iranpour,
Robin Richards
Imperial College London
25 iv 06
Function is what really matters ? The relationship with alignment ? We know that they are related
– But how directly? The rules are different
– For osteotomy• overcorrect 62%
– For uka• Undercorrect leave varus
– For tka• ?undercorrect? or neutral
We also know that everyone is different– So does everyone deserve a unique plan?
25 iv 06
Accuracy vs function
Better function
More accurate surgery
Type II error
25 iv 06
Our Aim
Preop plan for each individual Precise operation Documentation of position achieved Correlated with function
25 iv 06
This paper
Will show you how to measure Will talk about what to measure And suggest a way forward
25 iv 06
1 how to measure
Computerised Axial Tomography– Modality of choice in the skeleton
-Planning
-Outcome measurement
Dose optimisation vs image quality• Minimising dose
25 iv 06
X-rays Inaccurate
– Magnification• 8-20%
– Perspective distortion• Rotation in one plane creates compound errors
25 iv 06
CT
Virtual surgery– Accurate pre-op planning
Ability to measure outcome– And confirm the link
• between structure and function
25 iv 06
Dose measurements Assumed Linear relationship
– between radiation dose and malignancy.
Effective dose mSv-Weighted Dose received by the key dose sensitive organs.
10mSv gives a 1 in 2000 risk of radiation induced malignancy.
2.5mSv is annual background in UK
25 iv 06
Risks CXR – 0.02 mSv Transatlantic flight 0.04mSv Long leg measurement film – 0.7 mSv… Lumbar spine x-ray – 1.3 mSv CT abdo/pelvis – 10mSv
Upper recommended limit – 5 mSv / year
Perth protocol - 2.5 mSv (Chauhan et al JBJS 2004 86 – B) kV 140, mAs 85 2.5mm slices
25 iv 06
Methods
Phantom pelvis and limbs Varied the scan parameters Evaluated the image quality Effective dose measurements 2 commercial software packages
– CT DOSE & CT-EXPO
25 iv 06
Phantom
25 iv 06
Splint
Conventional trauma splint Stabilise leg and knee Distract the medial condyles Blind areas (Movement detection software)
25 iv 06
Splinting
Picture of splint note can open the joint
Motion detecting software
25 iv 06
Hip Centre
25 iv 06
Ankle
25 iv 06
Planning
25 iv 06
Post op analysis
25 iv 06
Post op analysis
25 iv 06
Planned ve achieved
25 iv 06
Tibia
25 iv 06
Results
0.50 0.760.74
Total effective
dose (worst case)
0.0054x2.5mm545120Ankles
0.124x1mm20100120Knees
0.640.370.564x5mm
0.640.370.614x2.5mm580120Hips
Female patientMale patient
Calculation using CT-EXPO programme
Calculation using CT DOSE programme
Effective Dose (mSv)CollimationScan length (cm)
mAskVpArea scanned
25 iv 06
Results
=
~ 0.7mSv ♀ 0.735mSv♂ 0.5mSv
25 iv 06
Scan Time
Actual scan time under 1 Min
25 iv 06
New CT scanners 16/64 slice – 256 More Detectors (Use more of the dose) Artifact reduction Speed Volume data
in 3 planes
Standing CT Segmenting MRI
25 iv 06
Summary 1
How to measure Imperial Protocol: CT can be rapidly acquired 40s 2D and 3D post operative analysis Real measurements of implant position
can be obtained We are now able to fully measure the
accuracy of CAOS systems well within the envelope of +/- 2mm & 2
For the same dose as a standing film
25 iv 06
Our Protocol
451202.5mm5cm distal tib/fib & talus
Ankle
1001201.0mm10cm either side of joint line
Knee
801202.5mmFemoral headHip
80Mid pelvis to feetTopogram(Scout film)
mAskVCollimationAreaPROTOCOL
