Alcohol Consumption

25
Alcohol Consumption Allyson Cady Dave Klotz Brandon DeMille Chris Ross

description

Alcohol Consumption. Allyson Cady Dave Klotz Brandon DeMille Chris Ross. Data. Total alcohol Beer Wine Spirits Yearly data, from 1935-1999 Gallons of ethanol consumption, per capita. Alcohol Consumption. Prohibition ended in 1935. Why alcohol consumption?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Alcohol Consumption

Page 1: Alcohol Consumption

Alcohol Consumption

Allyson CadyDave KlotzBrandon DeMilleChris Ross

Page 2: Alcohol Consumption

Data

• Total alcohol– Beer– Wine– Spirits

• Yearly data, from 1935-1999• Gallons of ethanol consumption,

per capita

Page 3: Alcohol Consumption

Alcohol Consumption

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95

ALLALCOHOLBEER

WINESPIRITS

Prohibition ended in 1935

Page 4: Alcohol Consumption

Why alcohol consumption?

• Big industry with big money (approx. $70 billion in 1997, an increase of 17% from 5 years prior)

• Health issues• Drunk driving and other alcohol related deaths• We are college students• We recently went through a period of war

Page 5: Alcohol Consumption

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95

ALLALCOHOLBEER

WINESPIRITS

WWII Vietnam Persian Gulf

War-time Drinking

Page 6: Alcohol Consumption

War-time Dummy

• Originally, we were planning to include a dummy variable to capture a wartime/non-wartime trend

• Although this kind of variable is useful in explaining the past, it doesn’t help with forecasting

• The dummy variable was left out of all models

Page 7: Alcohol Consumption

Data is evolutionary

• To get rid of the evolutionary properties,– Take log– First differenceResults in percentage change in each period

After doing this, the data becomes much more stationary

Page 8: Alcohol Consumption

Modeling

• First attempts used ARMA techniques, but found that MA processes worked better

• Similar model found for all data sets

Page 9: Alcohol Consumption

Model- Total Alcohol

Dependent Variable: DLNALLALCMethod: Least SquaresDate: 05/26/03 Time: 19:26Sample(adjusted): 1935 1999Included observations: 65 after adjusting endpoints

Convergence achieved after 30 iterationsBackcast: 1923 1934Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. C 0.012423 0.007874 1.577789 0.1199MA(1) 0.202583 0.102955 1.967686 0.0537MA(4) 0.200271 0.038070 5.260578 0.0000MA(9) 0.532056 0.038013 13.99652 0.0000MA(12) -0.367795 0.077569 -4.741518 0.0000R-squared 0.480532 Mean dependent var 0.012668Adjusted R-squared 0.445900 S.D. dependent var 0.054615S.E. of regression 0.040654 Akaike info criterion -3.493621Sum squared resid 0.099166 Schwarz criterion -3.326361Log likelihood 118.5427 F-statistic 13.87567Durbin-Watson stat 1.510219 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000Inverted MA Roots .83 -.42i .83+.42i .79 .50 -.86i

.50+.86i -.10 -.91i -.10+.91i -.43+.70i -.43 -.70i -.80+.57i -.80 -.57i -.99

Page 10: Alcohol Consumption

-0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

-0.2

-0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95

Residual Actual Fitted

Model- Total Alcohol

Page 11: Alcohol Consumption

Model- BeerDependent Variable: DLNBEERMethod: Least SquaresDate: 05/26/03 Time: 19:33Sample(adjusted): 1935 1999Included observations: 65 after adjusting endpoints

Convergence achieved after 12 iterationsBackcast: 1922 1934Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. C 0.010879 0.005165 2.106321 0.0393MA(1) 0.338015 0.057139 5.915627 0.0000MA(8) 0.482068 0.073578 6.551768 0.0000MA(13) -0.346007 0.000297 -1163.471 0.0000R-squared 0.559543 Mean dependent var 0.011038Adjusted R-squared 0.537881 S.D. dependent var 0.042006S.E. of regression 0.028555 Akaike info criterion -4.214377Sum squared resid 0.049740 Schwarz criterion -4.080568Log likelihood 140.9672 F-statistic 25.83085Durbin-Watson stat 1.867790 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000Inverted MA Roots .85 -.42i .85+.42i .84 .44+.78i

.44 -.78i .14+.88i .14 -.88i -.39+.91i -.39 -.91i -.68 -.54i -.68+.54i -.95 -.29i

-.95+.29i

Page 12: Alcohol Consumption

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95

Residual Actual Fitted

Model- Beer

Page 13: Alcohol Consumption

Model- SpiritsDependent Variable: DLNSPMethod: Least SquaresDate: 05/26/03 Time: 19:46Sample(adjusted): 1935 1999Included observations: 65 after adjusting endpoints

Convergence achieved after 16 iterationsBackcast: 1923 1934Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. C 0.011952 0.013801 0.865997 0.3899MA(1) 0.210494 0.039468 5.333299 0.0000MA(4) 0.361197 0.051499 7.013642 0.0000MA(9) 0.456485 0.067899 6.723014 0.0000MA(12) -0.349441 0.096900 -3.606184 0.0006R-squared 0.529189 Mean dependent var 0.012178Adjusted R-squared 0.497802 S.D. dependent var 0.093814S.E. of regression 0.066482 Akaike info criterion -2.509955Sum squared resid 0.265195 Schwarz criterion -2.342694Log likelihood 86.57354 F-statistic 16.85995Durbin-Watson stat 1.560509 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000Inverted MA Roots .82+.44i .82 -.44i .79 .51+.85i

.51 -.85i -.09 -.89i -.09+.89i -.46 -.70i -.46+.70i -.80+.58i -.80 -.58i -.96

Page 14: Alcohol Consumption

Model- Spirits

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95

Residual Actual Fitted

Page 15: Alcohol Consumption

Model- WineDependent Variable: DLNWINEMethod: Least SquaresDate: 05/26/03 Time: 19:50Sample(adjusted): 1935 1999Included observations: 65 after adjusting endpoints

Convergence achieved after 20 iterationsBackcast: 1924 1934Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. C 0.022948 0.013878 1.653610 0.1033MA(4) 0.711925 0.000400 1781.703 0.0000MA(11) -0.257302 0.057245 -4.494751 0.0000

R-squared 0.439531 Mean dependent var 0.023382Adjusted R-squared 0.421451 S.D. dependent var 0.100067S.E. of regression 0.076113 Akaike info criterion -2.268129Sum squared resid 0.359182 Schwarz criterion -2.167772Log likelihood 76.71418 F-statistic 24.31080Durbin-Watson stat 2.309783 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000Inverted MA Roots .81 .75 -.59i .75+.59i .45 -.76i

.45+.76i -.15 -.80i -.15+.80i -.67+.73i -.67 -.73i -.78 -.30i -.78+.30i

Page 16: Alcohol Consumption

Model- Wine

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95

Residual Actual Fitted

Page 17: Alcohol Consumption

Summary of Models

• Total Alcohol:

C, MA(1), MA(4), MA(9), MA(12)• Beer:

C, MA(1), MA(8), MA(13)• Spirits:

C, MA(1), MA(4), MA(9), MA(12)• Wine:

C, MA(4), MA(11)

Page 18: Alcohol Consumption

Forecast- All alcohol

-0.2

-0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10

ALLTIMETOTAL

Page 19: Alcohol Consumption

Forecast- Beer

-0.10

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10

ALLTIMEBEER

Page 20: Alcohol Consumption

Forecast- Spirits

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10

ALLTIMESPIRITS

Page 21: Alcohol Consumption

Forecast- Wine

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10

ALLTIMEWINE

Page 22: Alcohol Consumption

Forecasts in Gallons per Capita

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10

ALLALCOHOLBEER

SPIRITSWINE

Page 23: Alcohol Consumption

Forecast Results

• All forecasts show a similar pattern, with gradual increases expected in the future

  1999 Consumption 2010 Forecast Expected Change Expected Percent Change

Total 2.21 gallons 2.52 gallons 0.31 gallons 14.0%

Beer 1.25 1.40 0.15 12.0%

Spirits 0.64 0.73 0.09 14.1%

Wine 0.32 0.44 0.12 37.5%

Page 24: Alcohol Consumption

Conclusions• Americans are expected to increase their

alcohol consumption by 14% over the period from 1999 to 2010– Wine is expected to see the largest percentage

increase– Beer is expected to see the largest absolute

increase

• Increased consumption could lead to more difficulties with drunk driving, health issues, etc.– Awareness will become increasingly critical in

the near future

Page 25: Alcohol Consumption

The End