ASSIGMENT MIDTEST

ELECTRE METHOD

IMAM MUKHRI

12522276

DEPARTEMENT INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

FACULTY TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY

UNIVERSITY ISLAM INDONESIA

2015

ELECTRE methods including on multiple criteria decision analysis methods that originated in Europe

in the 1960s. ELECTRE is the acronym of Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la réalité or in English

means Expressing Elimination and Choice Reality. According to Janko and Bernoider (2005: 11),

ELECTRE is one of multiple criteria decision making method based on the concept of outranking using

pairwise comparison of alternatives based on any appropriate criteria. ELECTRE methods used in

conditions where alternative which is less in accordance with the criteria eliminated and suitable

alternative can be generated. In other words, ELECTRE used for cases with many alternatives but few

criteria are involved (Setiyawati). An alternative is said to dominate another alternative if one or more

of the criteria are exceeded (in comparison to other alternative criteria) and together with other criteria

remaining (Kusumadewi, 2006). Measures undertaken in problem solving using ELECTRE method is

as follows:

Model reliability EconomicsCivic 7 9 9Saturn 8 7 8Ford 9 6 8Mazda 6 7 8

weight 0.3 0.4 0.3normalization model reliability economicscivic 49 81 81saturn 64 49 64ford 81 36 64mazda 36 49 64sum 230 215 273

sqrt 15.16575089 14.662878316.5227116

4

Rij 0.461566331 0.6137949060.54470477

9

0.527504379 0.4773960380.48418202

6

0.593442426 0.4091966040.48418202

6

0.395628284 0.4773960380.48418202

6

w preperation 0.3 0.4 0.3 1Wij/Sum Wij 0.3 0.4 0.3

Vij model reliability economics

Civic 0.138469899 0.2455179620.16341143

4

Saturn 0.158251314 0.1909584150.14525460

8

Ford 0.178032728 0.1636786410.14525460

8

Mazda 0.118688485 0.1909584150.14525460

8

concordance 0.3 0.4 0.3

Civic C12 -0.0197814140.05455954

70.01815682

6

C13 -0.0395628280.08183932

10.01815682

6

C14 0.0197814140.05455954

70.01815682

6

Saturn C21 0.019781414

-0.05455954

7

-0.01815682

6

C23 -0.0197814140.02727977

4 0C24 0.039562828 0 0

Ford C31 0.039562828

-0.08183932

1

-0.01815682

6

C32 0.019781414

-0.02727977

4 0

C34 0.059344243

-0.02727977

4 0

Mazda C41 -0.019781414

-0.05455954

7

-0.01815682

6C42 -0.039562828 0 0

C43 -0.0593442430.02727977

4 0

C matrixCivic X 0.7 0.7 1

Saturn 0.3 X 0.7 1Ford 0.3 0.6 X 0.6

Mazda 0 0.7 0.7 X

Discordance 0.3 0.4 0.3

Civic D12 0.0197814140.05455954

70.01815682

6

D13 0.0395628280.08183932

10.01815682

6

D14 0.0197814140.05455954

70.01815682

6

Saturn D21 0.0197814140.05455954

70.01815682

6

D23 0.0197814140.02727977

4 0D24 0.039562828 0 0

Ford D31 0.0395628280.08183932

10.01815682

6

D32 0.0197814140.02727977

4 0

D34 0.0593442430.02727977

4 0

Mazda D41 0.0197814140.05455954

70.01815682

6D42 0.039562828 0 0

D43 0.0593442430.02727977

4 0

up max bellow max0.01978141

40.05455954

70.03956282

80.08183932

1

0.054559547

0.054559547

0.019781414

0.027279774

0.081839321

0.081839321

0.027279774

0.027279774

0.027279774

0.059344243

0.054559547

0.054559547

0.039562828

0.039562828

0.059344243

0.059344243

matrix DiscordanceCivic

x0.36256558

60.48342078

2 0Saturn

1 x0.72513117

3 0Ford

1 1 x0.45968694

5Mazda 1 1 1 x

Threshold Value Corcodance Discordance0.608333333 0.669233707

Matrix FCivic x 1 1 1Saturn 0 x 1 1Ford 0 0 x 0Mazda 0 1 1 x

Matrix GCivic x 0 0 0Saturn 1 x 1 0Ford 1 1 x 0Mazda 1 1 1 x

agregate dominanceCivic x 0 0 0

Saturn 0 x 1 0Ford 0 0 x 0

Mazda 0 1 1 x

Hence, Mazda will be alternatives that choose because of Mazda have the biggest

value of aggregate dominance