aimp2.apec.org Docs/2621/… · Web viewIn keeping with the United Nations "Sustainable Energy...
Transcript of aimp2.apec.org Docs/2621/… · Web viewIn keeping with the United Nations "Sustainable Energy...
APEC Project Completion Report
SECTION A: Project profile
Project number & title:
Project time period:
Committee / WG / Fora:
EWG 12 2015A – Ethanol Trade Development as Part of APEC’s Renewable Fuel Strategy
Date submitted 17/5/2017
EWG 12-2015A/ Energy Working Group
Project Overseer Name / Organization / Economy:
Cary Bloyd Ph.D./ Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
SECTION B: Project report and reflection 1. Project description: In 3-4 sentences, please describe the project and its main objectives.
In keeping with the United Nations "Sustainable Energy for All" initiative, and the aspirational goal to double the share of renewables in the energy mix by 2030, the United States conducted a workshop on the margins of APEC Energy Working Group meeting in 2016 and conducted a final workshop along the margins of the 2017 F.O. Licht Ethanol conference in Bangkok, Thailand. The workshops were geared toward enhancing the capacity of APEC member economies to foster development of domestic ethanol sectors buoyed by vibrant regional trade.
2. Meeting objectives: Describe how the project met each of its proposed objectives. Please outline any challenges you may have encountered in delivering the activity.
The meetings comprised of 29 international speakers and 36 participants representing 17 APEC member economies. At the 2016 workshop, each speaker delivered presentations focused on the Roadmap as it relates to their economy’s’s strategies and experiences with renewable energy. The 2017 workshop disseminated the road maps and case studies developed following the first workshop and focused on the development of an enabling policy and institutional environment for ethanol by leveraging linkages with external stakeholders who can provide on-going policy, financial and knowledge support leading to ethanol project development and increased trade. The outcome of the workshop was the endorsement of the road maps for implementation across APEC economies.
3. Evaluation: Describe the process undertaken to evaluate the project upon completion. (e.g. evaluation through participant surveys, peer reviews of outputs, assessments against indicators, statistics demonstrating use of outputs etc.). Provide analysis of results of evaluations conducted and where possible include information on impacts on gender. Evaluation data needs to be included as an appendix.
Workshop surveys were conducted as an evaluation criterion. Participants who completed the survey either strongly agreed or agreed in response to the following questions:
· The objectives of the training were clearly defined· The project achieved its intended objectives· The agenda items and topics covered were relevant· The content was well organized and easy to follow· The trainers/ experts or facilitators were well prepared and knowledgeable about the topic· The materials distributed were useful· The time allotted for the training was sufficient
All except one participant disagreed to the following question:
· Gender issues were sufficiently addressed during implementation
4. Output indicators: Describe the main project outputs below. This may include workshops, tools, research papers, reports, recommendations, best practices, action plans..Indicators(Edit or Insert rows as needed)
# planned # actual Details or notes
# workshops / events# participants (M/F) # economies attending
1 135/25 19/1720 17
# speakers engaged # other organizations engaged
35 29
# publications distributed # recommendations agreed on
2 2
Other:
Comments:
5. Outcomes: Describe any specific medium-term changes to policy, processes or behaviour that can be attributed to result from this activity. Please include details on:· What indicators were used to measure medium-term impact? (Example indicators: type/number
of policies/ regulations/processes changed, % of businesses conforming to new standards, change in sector’s commercial activity, # individual action plans developed, # agencies using resource or tools etc.)
· Monitoring plans in place and proposed indicators to measure impacts, including any impacts on gender. Please summarise relevant information.
The Roadmaps and Case studies documents were published on the APEC website in March 2017. Workshop attendees were given copies.
6. Participants: This section contains a summary of participants and must be gender-disaggregated. (Note that a full participant contact list is a mandatory requirement for all project events. The full participant list must contain contact info, gender, and job titles. It may be included as an appendix or inserted below).
Economy(Insert rows as needed) # male # female Total
Australia
BrazilCanadChile
ChinaChinese Taipei Indonesia Japan
KoreaMalaysia Mexico Peru Philippines Russia Viet Nam Thailand United States Speakers
1 0 1
1 0 10 1 10 1 12 0 2
2 0 2
4 1 52 1 3
2 0 2
3 0 32 0 2
1 0 1
1 2 31 0 1
1 1 2
7 3 10
14 3 17
25 4 29
Comments: What was the approach undertaken for participant nomination/selection and targeting? Please provide details. What follow-up actions are expected? How will participants/beneficiaries continue to be engaged and supported to progress this work?
The project overseer contacted EWG representatives along with U.S posts from each of the economies to nominate participants for the workshop. Nominees from travel eligible economies were encouraged to nominate two participants.
7. Key findings: Describe 1-3 examples of key findings, challenges or success stories arising from the project (e.g. research or case studies results, policy recommendations, roadblocks to progress on an issue, impacts on gender).
The meeting concluded with delegates sharing experiences from their economies about their successes and challenges of implementing a fuel ethanol program. Delegates discussed the “Roadmap for increasing ethanol production, use, and blending in transport fuel” and agreed that it is a valuable tool for economies to consider for achieving domestic economic growth, energy diversification in transport fuel, greenhouse gas reductions, clean air and energy security in road transportation fuel. Further, the working group participants recommended that the Expert Group on New and Renewable Technologies endorse the Roadmap and send it to the Energy Working Group for consideration for inclusion in the next APEC Energy Ministerial Declaration
8. Next steps: Describe any planned follow-up steps or projects, such as workshops, post-activity evaluations, or research to assess the impact of this activity. How will the indicators from Question 5 be tracked? How will this activity inform any future APEC activities?
The Ethanol Working Group proposes the following language for the next APEC Energy Ministerial Declaration:
“We support the production, use and trade of ethanol throughout the APEC region as a viable means for meeting the goal of doubling the share of renewables by 2030. We endorse the Roadmap developed by the Ethanol Working Group under the leadership of the Expert Group on New and Renewable Energy Technologies, and our individual economies will consider the roadmap as a potential means of meeting APEC’s renewable energy goals”.
The project overseer is expected to follow up on the progress and future actions taken by the economies.
9. Feedback for the Secretariat: Do you have suggestions for more effective support by APEC fora or the Secretariat? Any assessment of consultants, experts or other stakeholders to share? The Secretariat examines feedback trends to identify ways to improve our systems.
SECTION C: BudgetAttach a detailed breakdown of the APEC- provided project budget, including:
· Planned costs: (using most recently approved budget figures)· Actual expenditures· Variance notes: An explanation of any budget line under- or over-spent by 20% or more.
Item Description Budget Planned Costs Actualexpenditures
%Variance
Balance Variance Notes
Speaker's Honorarium
18,000 4,500. 0.0 - 4,500 Honorarium was not givenConsultant
Fee (Secretary fee
3,772 2,448. 0.0 - 2,448 Consultant fee was not given
Per Diem - Speakers/Experts
14,228 7,404 3,358.75 -55% 4,045 Fewer travel eligible participants
Per Diem - Participants/Train ees
0.00 27,148 18,431 -47% 8,716 Fewer travel eligible participants
Item Description Budget Planned Costs Actualexpenditures
%Variance
Balance Variance Notes
Airfare -Speakers/Experts
60,000 34,500 16,021.84 -54% 18,478.16 Fewerattendees than expected
Airfare -Participants/Train ees
24,000 44,000 17,448.18 -60% 26,551.82 Fewerattendees than expected
Total **** 120,000 120,000 55,260.02 -54% 64,739.98
SECTION D: Appendices Please attach the following documentation to the report as required. Note that the participant contact list is a mandatory requirement for all Project Completion Reports .
Appendices NotesParticipant contact list: contact info, gender, job titles Experts / consultants list: contact info, job titles, roles, genderEvent Agenda
Reports, websites or resources created: links or soft copies
Roadmap:http://publications.apec.org/publication-detail.php?pub id=1825Case Studies:http://publications.apec.org/publication-detail.php?pub id=1824
Post activity survey or other evaluation data (raw and/or aggregated)Other information or resources
FOR APEC SECRETARIAT USE ONLY APEC comments: Were APEC project guidelines followed? Could the project hav been managed more effectively or easily by the PO?
Appendix ISPEAKERS
Title Economy Name Gender Organization Email Topic
Deputy Administrator , Office of Global Analysis
United States
Daniel Whitley
M USDA Foreign Agricultural Service
[email protected] a.gov
APEC Ethanol Roadmap and Case Study Introductions
Senior Staff Scientist
United States
Dr. Cary Bloyd
M Pacific Northwest National Laboratory [email protected]
APEC Workshop Goals
Messages to APEC
Manager of Ethanol Export Market Development
U.S. Brian Healy M U.S. Grains Council [email protected] Ethanol Roadmap and Case Study Overview
Director, Global Policy Analysis Division
United States Paul Trupo M
USDA Foreign Agricultural Service
APEC Ministerial language Presentation
Renewable Energy Expert
ThailandMs. Pisamai Sathienyano n
F
Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency
Welcome and Thailand New Alternative Energy Development Plan
Closing Remarks
Vice President Government Affairs and Communicati ons
Canada Andrea KentM GreenField Specialty
Alcohols Inc. [email protected] and Health Benefits
Chief, Biomass Energy Management Division
PhilippinesRuby B. de Guzman
F Department of Energy
[email protected] ov.ph
Policy Tools
Scientist ThailandArkorn Soikaew M
Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency
[email protected] and Incentives
SPEAKERS
Title Economy Name Gender Organization Email Topic
Global Lead for Sustainable Bioenergy
United Nations
Gerry Ostheimer
M
UN Sustainable Energy for All
GEOE@novoz ymes.com
Bioenergy for Sustainable Development and a Low Carbon Future Panelist forModerated Discussion
Group Leader Systems Assessment Group Energy Systems Division
United States
Dr. Michael Wang
M
Argonne National Laboratory
[email protected] vLife-cycle Analysis of GreenhouseGas Emissions of Biofuels
Executiv eDirector
BrazilEduardo Leão Sousa
M
UNICA Brazilian Sugarcane Association
eduardo@uni ca.com.br
Building a Domestic Industry
HowInternational Trade in Ethanol and BiofuelFeedstocks can Ensure Competitive and HealthyRenewable EnergyPrograms
Director Australia Gavin Hughes
MBiofuels Association of Australia
ghughes@bio fuelsassociati on.com.au
AustralianDomestic Ethanol Industry Case Study
Executive VicePresident
United States
Steve Bleyl
M
Green Plains Inc. Steve.Bleyl@ gpreinc.com
Petroleum Refining Economics – Ethanol as an Octane Enhancer
Infrastructure Necessary for Developmentfor End Users
Vice President
United States
Doug Berven
M
POET doug.berven@p oet.com
SecondGeneration Biofuels
Improving Profitabilityof Ethanol Plants
General Counsel
Chief Economis
United States
United States
Ed Hubbard
Mike Dwyer
M
M
Renewable FuelsAssociation
U.S. Grains Council
ehubbard@ethaBuilding a Domestic Ethanol
Global Ethanol Overview
nolrfa.org
mdwyer@gra ins.org
SPEAKERS
Title Economy Name Gender Organization Email Topic
Vice President Environmenta l Health
United States
Angela TinF American Lung
Association of the Upper Midwest
[email protected] Air Quality Impacts
Executive Vice President/Co- Publisher
United States Marc
J. Rauch
MThe Auto Channel LLC
marcrauch@eart hlink.net EnginePerformance at
Different Blend Levels (E3, E10, E20)
Head of the Department of Motor and Aviation Gasolines and Additives
Russi an Feder ati on
Mikhail Ershov
MAll-RussiaResearch Institute of Oil Refining ershovma@v niinp.ru
Government Regulation of Bioethanol Market in Russian and Results of E30 Fuel Development
Petrochemica l Engineer
Peru
Mishel Espino za Ramos
MMinistry ofEngineeringand Mining
MIESPINOZA@m inem.gob.pe
Peru Domestic Ethanol Industry Case Study
Deputy Director General, Department of Science and
Viet Nam Mr. Tran Viet Hoa
M
Ministry of Industry and Trade
HoaTV@moit .gov.vn
Viet Nam Domestic Ethanol Industry Case Study
Senior Engineer Ch
i na
LiWenjun
MChina Petroleum and Chemical Industry Federation
[email protected] g.cn China Domestic Ethanol Industry Case Study
Renewable EnergySection Chief
APEC
EGNR
E
Chinese Taipei
Dr. Chung- Hsien Chen
MBureau of Energy, Ministry of Economic Affairs
Ctchen2@moea. gov.tw Workshop
Opening and Closing Remarks`
Vice President, Technology
Chines e
TaipeiDr. Tom Lee
MGreen Cellulosity Corp.
htlee@gcc- tech.com
Chinese Taipei Domestic Ethanol Industry Case Study
Director, Global Policy Analysis Division
United States
Paul Trupo
M
U.S. Foreign Agricultural Service
Paul.trupo@fas. usda.gov
Opening
Remarks x2
Closing Remarks
Closing Remarks and Next Steps
SPEAKERS
Title Economy Name Gender Organization Email Topic
Engineer ThailandNatikorn Prakobboon
M Department of Alternative Energy and Efficiency
Natikorn_p@d Thailand Domestic Ethanol Industry Case Study
ede.go.th
Director IndonesiaMr.Totok Sulistiyanto Wardoyo
MPT. Narama Mandiri
hudha_wijayant [email protected]
Indonesia Domestic Ethanol Industry Case Study
PARTICIPANTS
Title Economy Name Gender Organization Email
Professor Australia Ian O'HaraM
QueenslandState Development [email protected] v.au
Engineer, Hydrocarbon s Department
Chile’Ms. Paola Inés Llanos Vega
FNational Energy Commission (CNE) [email protected]
1.Director
2.Senior Expert in Energy Policy; Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Development
IndonesiaMr.Totok Sulistiyanto Wardoyo
M
PT. Narama Mandiri(Mechanical,Electrical and Energy Consultant)
totok.sulis@naramama ndiri.net
Professor Indonesia Dr. Adi Surjosatyo
MUniversity of Indonesia [email protected]
Chief Research Engineer
KoreaMr. YONG AN SHIN
MGS Caltex Corporation [email protected]
Country Director Korea Haksoo Kim
MU.S. Grains Council
PRINCIPAL ASSISTANT SECRETARY
Malaysia
MOHD FADLI BIN MOHD SHARIFF
MMINISTRY OF PLANTATION INDUSTRIES AND COMMODITIES, MALAYSIA
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
Malaysia MOHD HAFDZUAN
MASSISTANT SECRETARY [email protected]
BIN ADZMI
Country Director
MalaysiaKevin Roepk
MU.S. Grains Council [email protected]
Country Director
Mexico Ryan LeGran
MU.S. Grains Council [email protected]
Senior Science Research Specialist
PhilippinesRamon O. Jaurigue
MDEPARTMENT OF ENERGY-PHILIPPINES [email protected]
Science Research Specialist II
PhilippinesGeraldine M. Sacayan
FDEPARTMENT OF ENERGY- PHILIPPINES
[email protected] [email protected]
Head of Renewable Energy Lab
ThailandDr. Nuwong CHOLLACO OP
MNational Metal and Materials Technology Center (MTEC) [email protected]
Engineer Thailand
Mr. Dechatorn Raungkraok onkit
M Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Ministry of Energy
Agricultural Economist
U.S. Kimberly Marie
FUSDA Foreign Agricultural Service [email protected].
gov
Chief Economist United States Mike Dwyer
MU.S. Grains Council
Acting Director of Oil and Gas Processing
Viet NamMrs. NGO THUY QUYNH
F General Directorate of Energy,
Ministry of Industry and Trade of Vietnam
Deputy General Director for Renewable Energies
MexicoMr. Luis A. Munozcano A.
M
Secretaría de Energía de Mexico (SENER)
[email protected] .mxs
Assistant Director
ChinaJunyang Jiang
MU.S. Grains Council [email protected]
n
Agricultural specialist Thailand
K.Ponnarong
MUSDA Foreign Agricultural Service Ponnarong.Prasertsri@fas .
usda.gov
Policy and Plan Analyst
ThailandWarote Chaintarawo ng
MDepartment of Alternative Development and Efficiency [email protected]
Science Research Specialist II
PhilippinesCastle Faere Ishelry M. Santos
M
Department of Energy
[email protected] ov. ph
Engineer ThailandDechatorn Raungkraiko nkit
MDepartment of Alternative Energy and Efficiency [email protected]
Undersecretar y of the Biofuel Division
MalaysiaAhmad Farid BinMohammed
MMinistry of Plantation Industries and Commodities
PresidentRussian Federation
Alexey Ablayev
MRussian Biofuels Association
Engineer China Ye WantingM China Petroleum and
Chemical Industry Federation [email protected]
Business Analyst for Bioenergy Business Services
IndonesiaKharisma Mora
F
DG of New Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation - MEMR
kharisma23mora@yahoo. co m
Researcher JapanMrs. Tran Thi Lien Phuong
FAsia Pacific Energy Research Center [email protected]
Director Korea InChul Hwang
MKorea Energy Agency [email protected]
Japan Director JapanTetsuo Tommy Hamamoto
MU.S. Grains Council [email protected]
Manager Ethanol Programs
United StatesAshley Kongs
FU.S. Grains Council [email protected]
Agricultural Specialist
Chinese Taipei
Chiou-Mey Perng
F
American Institute in Chinese [email protected] ov
Country Director
Chinese Taipei Joann Shih
F ADM Asia-Pacific Trading Pte. Ltd. Chinese Taipei Branch [email protected]
Operation Supply Chain Manager
IndonesiaErwin Hiswanto
MPT Pertamina (Persero)
Erwin.hiswanto@pertamin a. com
Analyst Non Fuel Business Development
IndonesiaHeny Sri Wahyuni
MPT Pertamina (Persero)
Heny.wahyuni@pertamin a.c om
Agricultural Economist United States Brian Healy
M
U.S. Foreign Agricultural Service [email protected]
Country Director
Korea Mr. Haksoo Kim
MU.S. Grains Council [email protected]
Senior Policy and Plan Analyst
ThailandMs. Munlika Sompranon
FDepartment of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency [email protected]
Professional Scientist Thailand
Ms.Rungrudee Boonsu
FDepartment of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency
EngineerHong Kong, China Mr. Willy Yu
M Electrical and Mechanical Services Department, Government of the HKSAR
wl_yu@[email protected]
Senior Researcher Japan
Mr. Michael Sinocruz
MAsia Pacific Energy research Center
[email protected] .or.jp
Country Director
Chinese Taipei
Mr. Clover S.Y. Chang
MU.S. Grains Council [email protected]
Senior Staff Scientist
United States Dr. Cary Bloyd
MPacific Northwest National Laboratory [email protected]
Appendix II
2016 APEC EXPERT GROUP ON NEW AND RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES FORUM
AGENDA (Draft)
EWG 12 2015A – Ethanol Trade Development as Part of APEC’s Renewable Fuel Strategy
Monday, April 11, 2016
Time Agenda
07:30-08:30 Registration
08:30-08:35 Welcoming RemarksDr. Chung-Hsien Chen – APEC EGNRET ChairSection Chief, Renewable Energy Section, Bureau of Energy, Ministry of Economic Affairs
08:35-08:45 Workshop Opening RemarksPaul Trupo – Director, Global Policy Analysis Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service
08:45-09:15 Global Ethanol OverviewMike Dwyer – Chief Economist, U.S. Grains Council
09:15-09:45 Building a Domestic Ethanol IndustryEd Hubbard – General Counsel, Renewable Fuels Association Eduardo Leão Sousa – Executive Director, UNICA
09:45-10:15 How International Trade in Ethanol and Biofuel Feedstocks can Ensure Competitive and Healthy Renewable Energy ProgramsEd Hubbard – General Counsel, Renewable Fuels AssociationEduardo Leão Sousa – Executive Director, UNICA
10:15-10:30 Coffee Break
Case Studies – Overview of Each Economy’s Domestic Ethanol Industry
10:30-10:50 PhilippinesRuby B. De Guzman – Chief, Biomass Energy Management Division, Department of Energy
10:50-11:10 Chinese TaipeiDr. Tom Lee – Vice President, Technology, Green Cellulosity Corp.
11:10-11:30 CanadaMark Stumborg - Professional Engineer, Swift Innovation
11:30-11:50 VietnamNguyen Phu Cuong - Director, Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Industry and Trade
11:50-12:10 AustraliaGavin Hughes - CEO, Biofuels Association of Australia
12:10-13:25 Networking Lunch
13:25-13:50 GHG Lifecycle AnalysisMichael Wang - Group Leader, Systems Assessment Group, Argonne National Laboratory
13:50-14:15 Food vs. FuelGerry Ostheimer - Global Lead for Sustainable Bioenergy, UN Sustainable Energy for All Initiative
14:15-14:40 Air Quality ImpactsAngela Tin - Vice President Environmental Health, American Lung Association of the Upper Midwest
14:40-15:05 Engine Performance at Different Blend Levels (E3, E10, E20)Marc J. Rauch - Executive Vice President/Co-Publisher, The Auto Channel LLC
15:05-15:25 Coffee Break
15:25-15:50 Second Generation BiofuelsDoug Berven - Vice President of Corporate Affairs, POET
15:50-16:15 Petroleum Refining Economics – Ethanol as an Octane EnhancerSteve Bleyl - Executive Vice President-Ethanol Marketing, Green Plains Inc.
16:15-16:40 Improving Profitability of Ethanol PlantsDoug Berven - Vice President of Corporate Affairs, POET
16:40-17:05 Biofuel Applications in a Low Oil Price Environment Speaker TBD
17:05-17:10 Closing RemarksPaul Trupo - Director, Global Policy Analysis Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service
17:10-18:50 Hosted Reception – UN Sustainable Energy for All
Tuesday, April 12, 2016
08:30-08:40 Opening RemarksPaul Trupo - Director, Global Policy Analysis Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service
08:40-09:05 Overcoming the Challenges of Meeting the MandateJim Miller - Vice President and Chief Economist, Growth Energy
09:05-09:30 Infrastructure Necessary for Development for End UsersSteve Bleyl - Executive Vice President-Ethanol Marketing, Green Plains Inc.Case Studies (continued)
09:30-09:50 ThailandNatikorn Prakobboon - Engineer, Department of Alternative Energy and Efficiency
09:50-10:10 Russia - Government Regulation of Bioethanol Market in Russia and Results of E30 Fuel DevelopmentDr. Mikhail Ershov - Head of the Department of Motor and Aviation Gasoline and Additives, All-Russia Research Institute of Oil Refining (VNIINP JSC)
10:10-10:25 Coffee Break
10:25-10:45 ChinaLi Wenjun - Senior Engineer, China Petroleum and Chemical Industry Federation
10:45-11:05 PeruMishel Espinoza Ramos - Petrochemical Engineer, Ministry of Engineering and Mining
11:05-11:50 Moderated Panel Discussion –Best Practices, Lessons Learned, PolicyRecommendations, Opportunities for Expanding Ethanol Production, Use andTrade in APEC EconomiesMike Dwyer - Chief Economist, U.S. Grains CouncilEduardo Leão Sousa - Executive Director, UNICAVu Kien Chinh - Director General, Tung Lam Ltd. CompanySpeaker TBDSpeaker TBD
11:50-12:05 Closing Remarks and Next StepsPaul Trupo - Director, Global Policy Analysis Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service
12:05-12:10 Workshop Farewell RemarksDr. Chung-Hsien Chen - APEC EGNRET ChairSection Chief, Renewable Energy Section, Bureau of Energy, Ministry of Economic Affairs
ENERGY WORKING GROUPAPEC EXPERT GROUP ON NEW AND RENEWABLE ENERGY
TECHNOLOGIES February 28 – March 2, 2017
Venue: Sheraton Grande Sukhumvit250 SUKHUMVIT ROAD, BANGKOK 10110, THAILAND
NOTIONAL AGENDA
Tuesday, February 28th, 2017
EWG 12 2015A – Ethanol Trade Development as Part of APEC’s Renewable Fuel Strategy
Time Agenda
08:00-09:00
Registration & Welcome Coffee
09:00-09:20
Welcome and Thailand New Alternative Energy Development PlanMs. Pisamai Sathienyanon – Renewable Energy Expert, Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Thailand
09:20-09:30
APEC Workshop GoalsDr. Cary Bloyd – Senior Staff Scientist, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
09:30-09:40
APEC Ethanol Roadmap and Case Study IntroductionsDaniel Whitley – Deputy Administrator, Office of Global Analysis, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service
09:40-10:15
APEC Ethanol Roadmap and Case Study OverviewBrian Healy – General Counsel, Renewable Fuels Association
10:15-10:45
Coffee Break
10:45-11:30 Environmental and Health BenefitsMs. Andrea Kent- Vice President Government Affairs and Communications, GreenFieldSpecialty Alcohols Inc., Canada
11:30-12:15 Economic BenefitsJim Miller –President, Agriculture and Biofuel Policy Consulting
Tuesday, February 28th, 2017 (continued)
EWG 12 2015A 12:15-13:45
– Ethanol Trade Development as Part of APEC’s Renewable Fuel Strategy Networking Lunch
13:45-14:30 Policy ToolsRuby B. de Guzman- Chief, Biomass Energy Management Division, Department of Energy, Philippines
14:30-15:15 Compliance and IncentivesArkorn Soikaew -Scientist, Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Thailand
15:15-15:45 Coffee Break
15:45-16:15 APEC Ministerial Language PresentationPaul Trupo – Director, Global Policy Analysis Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service
16:15-16:45 Messages to APECDr. Cary Bloyd – Senior Staff Scientist, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
16:45-16:50 Closing RemarksMs. Pisamai Sathienyanon – Renewable Energy Expert, Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Thailand
16:50-18:50 Hosted Reception Location: TBD
Wednesday, March 1, 2017
EWG 12 2015A – Ethanol Trade Development as Part of APEC’s Renewable Fuel Strategy F.O. Licht – Sugar & Ethanol Asia 2017
Time Agenda
08:30-09:00 Welcome Coffee
09:00-09:10 Opening Remarks from the ChairPrasert Tapaneeyangkul - President of Environmental Engineering Association of Thailand
09:10-09:40 Biofuel Markets and Feedstock Use: Past, Present, and FuturePaul Trupo - Director, Global Policy Analysis Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture
09:40-10:10 World Sugar Balance and PricingJohn Stansfield - Trader/Analyst, Group Sopex
10:10-10:40 Thailand Energy Policy and Planning with a Focus on the Role of Fuel Ethanol Twarath Sutabutr - Director General of Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, Thailand
10:40-10:55 Questions
10:55-11:25 Coffee Break
11:25-11:55 Funding Biofuels and Biomass Projects – Bringing Together Businesses, Governments and InvestorsM.K Balaji - Chief of Party, Deloitte Consulting LLP
11:55-12:15 Pakistan – An Ethanol Export OverviewShayan Aslam Khan - Sr. General Manager, Bulks and Ethanol Exports, Dewan Mushtaq Trade Limited
12:15-12:30 Questions
12:30-14:00 Networking Lunch
14:00-14:30 Global Trends in Data Management Optimization for Ethanol Production Patrick Williams - Global Technical Director, Novozymes Biorefining
14:30-15:00 Improving Performance of Ethanol Plants – A Global Perspective Hans Foerster - Global Marketing Director, DuPont
15:00-15:15 Questions
15:15-15:45 Coffee Break
15:45-16:15 Adding Value Through Product DiversificationIssara Twiltermsup - Executive Director, Khonburi Sugar Public Company Limited
16:15-16:45 Cassava to Ethanol: A Growing Market in Asia Speaker TBD
16:45-17:15 Case Study: 2G Ethanol Multi Feedstock Demonstration Plant Sukhraj Soni - Vice President at India Glycols Ltd.
Wednesday, March 1, 2017 (continued)
EWG 12 2015A – Ethanol Trade Development as Part of APEC’s Renewable Fuel StrategyF.O. Licht – Sugar & Ethanol Asia 2017
17:15-17:30 Questions
17:30-17:40 Closing Remarks from the Chair
17:40-19:00 Networking Reception
Thursday, March 2, 2016
EWG 12 2015A – Ethanol Trade Development as Part of APEC’s Renewable Fuel Strategy F.O. Licht – Sugar & Ethanol Asia 2017
Time Agenda
08:30-09:00 Welcome Coffee
09:00-09:05 Opening Remarks from the ChairTom McNeill – Director, Green Pool Commodities
09:05-09:35 The Impact of China Tariff’s Return and The Rise of China’s Corn-based Ethanol ExportMichael Mao – Ethanol Analyst, Sublime China Information
09:35-10:05 The New Focus: U.S. Ethanol Exports into Asia-Pacific Mike Dwyer – Chief Economist, U.S. Grains Council
10:05-10:35 Thailand: Could Thailand Become Present on the World Market? Thipwipha Puangcharoen – Analyst, Mitr Phol Biofuel
10:35-10:50 Questions
10:50-11:20 Coffee Break
11:20-11:50 Philippines – 2017 Production and Demand GapsQueenie Rojo – Executive Director, Ethanol Producers Association of the Philippines (EPAP)
11:50-12:20 Opportunities for Biofuels and Bioproducts in AustraliaIan O’Hara, Queensland Biofutures Envoy, Queensland Government Department of State Development
12:20-12:50 Future Gazing – Cars, Fuels, Ethanol & Sugar Tom McNeill – Director, Green Pool Commodities
12:50-13:05 Questions
13:05-13:10 Closing Remarks from the Chair
13:10-14:30 Networking Lunch
14:30 End of Conference
Appendix Ill
APEC Project Evaluation Survey: Seminar, Symposium, Workshop
APEC Project Name/Number: EWG 12 2015A
Date: March 6th 2017________________________
Instructions: Please indicate your level of agreement with the statements listed in the table below.
Strongly Agre Agree Disagree OMMENTS (Continue on back if necessar
The objectives of the training were clearly defined
x
The project achieved its intended objectives
x
The agenda items and topics covered were relevant
x
The content was well organized and easy to follow
x
Gender issues were sufficiently addressed during implementation
x
The trainers/experts or facilitators
were well prepared and knowledgeable about the topic
x
The materials distributed were useful
x
The time allotted for the training was sufficient.
x
1. How relevant was this project to you and your economy?
5 4 3 2 1X very mostly somewhat a little not much
Explain:_In Mexio a process to design a public policy for ethanol is in course and the workshop provided useful and practicalinformation on other economies policies
APEC Project Evaluation Survey: Seminar, Symposium, Workshop
APEC Project Name/Number: EWG 12 2015A
Date: February 29 to March 2, 2017
Instructions: Please indicate your level of agreement with the statements listed in the table below.
Strongly Agre Agree Disagree OMMENTS (Continue on back if necessar
The objectives of the training were clearly defined
X
The project achieved its intended objectives
X
The agenda items and topics covered were relevant
X
The content was well organized and easy to follow
X
Gender issues were sufficiently addressed during implementation
X
The trainers/experts or facilitators
were well prepared and knowledgeable about the topic
X
The materials distributed were useful
X
The time allotted for the training was sufficient.
X
1. How relevant was this project to you and your economy?
5 4 3 2 1very mostly somewhat a little not muchExplain: An important step for the U.S. to gather government officials and industry executives to exchange information on bioethanol use and promotion among APEC economies.
next steps.
2. In your view what were the project’s results/achievements?
Explain:__________________________________________________________________________________________
3. What new skills and knowledge did you gain from this event?Explain: Clearly understood the current level of adoption and uses of bioethanol in APEC economies and obstacles in its promotion where bioethanol is no a part of the policy.
4. Rate your level of knowledge of and skills in the topic prior to participating in the event:
5 4 3X 2 1very high high medium low very low
5. Rate your level of knowledge of and skills in the topic after participating in the event:
5 4X 3 2 1very high high medium low very low
Explain: I understood the current situation of bioethanol in the policies in the economies.
6. How will you apply the project’s content and knowledge gained at your workplace? Please provide examples (e.g. develop new policy initiatives, organise trainings, develop work plans/strategies, draft regulations, develop new procedures/tools etc.).
Explain: I will apply the knowledge earned by the workshop to my daily contacts and meetings with the Japanese government and relevant industries in promotion of U.S. bioethanol in Japan.
7. What needs to be done next by APEC? Are there plans to link the project’s outcomes to subsequent collective actions by fora or individual actions by economies?
8. How could this project have been improved? Please provide comments on how to improve the project, if relevant. There is little involvement by the Japanese industries and no involvement by the Japanese government. Japan has APERC under APEC in the energy area. APERC can be an organization to urge the Japanese to actively participate in the workshop or even take more responsibility in organizing the workshop.
Participant information (identifying information is
optional): Name: Tommy Hamamoto
Organisation/Economy: United States
Email: [email protected]
Gender: M
Thank you. Your evaluation is important in helping us assess this project, improve project quality and plan
APEC Project Evaluation Survey: Seminar, Symposium, Workshop
APEC Project Name/Number: EWG 12 2015A
Date: 03/06/2017_________________________
Instructions: Please indicate your level of agreement with the statements listed in the table below.
Strongly Agre Agree Disagree OMMENTS (Continue on back if necessar
The objectives of the training were clearly defined
x
The project achieved its intended objectives
x
The agenda items and topics covered were relevant
x
The content was well organized and easy to follow
x
Gender issues were sufficiently addressed during implementation
x
The trainers/experts or facilitators
were well prepared and knowledgeable about the topic
x
The materials distributed were useful
x
The time allotted for the training was sufficient.
x
1. How relevant was this project to you and your economy?
5 4 3 2 1very mostly somewhat a little not much
Explain:___________________________________________________________________________________________
next steps.
2. In your view what were the project’s results/achievements?
Explain:Achieve adoption of the roadmap and provide information concerning the importance of ethanol blending in achieving APEC environmental, economic and trade facilitation goals.
3. What new skills and knowledge did you gain from this event?Explain: Improved understanding of the issues governing the ethanol policies of other APEC member economies
4. Rate your level of knowledge of and skills in the topic prior to participating in the event:
5 4 3 2 1very high high medium low very low
5. Rate your level of knowledge of and skills in the topic after participating in the event:
5 4 3 2 1very high high medium low very low
Explain:__________________________________________________________________________________________
6. How will you apply the project’s content and knowledge gained at your workplace? Please provide examples (e.g. develop new policy initiatives, organise trainings, develop work plans/strategies, draft regulations, develop new procedures/tools etc.).
Explain: Expand our efforts in providing information to APEC member economies concerning the importance of ethanol, including collaboration on refiner, blender, retailer and consumer education
7. What needs to be done next by APEC? Are there plans to link the project’s outcomes to subsequent collective actions by fora or individual actions by economies?
If Roadmap is adopted by the EWG and Ministers (next steps), APEC needs to more fully engage in promoting the advantages of ethanol to its member economies including the education/information issues noted above.
8. How could this project have been improved? Please provide comments on how to improve the project, if relevant. More time for Q&A and discussion among the group
Participant information (identifying information is optional):
Name: James Miller
Organisation/Economy: Agriculture and Biofuel Policy Consulting/Growth Energy --
USA Email: [email protected]
Gender: M / F
Thank you. Your evaluation is important in helping us assess this project, improve project quality and plan
APEC Project Evaluation Survey: Seminar, Symposium, Workshop
APEC Project Name/Number: EWG 12 2015A
Date:
Instructions: Please indicate your level of agreement with the statements listed in the table below.
Strongly Agre Agree Disagree OMMENTS (Continue on back if necessar
The objectives of the training were clearly defined
x
The project achieved its intended objectives
x
The agenda items and topics covered were relevant
x
The content was well organized and easy to follow
x
Gender issues were sufficiently addressed during implementation
The trainers/experts or facilitators
were well prepared and knowledgeable about the topic
x
The materials distributed were useful
x
The time allotted for the training was sufficient.
x
1. How relevant was this project to you and your economy?
5 4 3 2 1very mostly somewhat a little not much
Explain:____________4_______________________________________________________________________________ it is important for economies in the region to learn from each other. For China, the ethanol program is mandatory only in some regions, while Thailand and the Philippines have a national mandatory program very well implemented. The policies and practices in these two economies are meaningful for Chinese policy makers.
2. In your view what were the project’s results/achievements?
E x p l a i n : K n o w l e d g e s h a r i n g a n d d i s c u s s i o n o n f i n d i n g s o l u t i o n s t o c o m m o n c h a l l e n g e s
3. What new skills and knowledge did you gain from this event?Explain:__________other economies experience, polices and practices
4. Rate your level of knowledge of and skills in the topic prior to participating in the event: 2
5 4 3 2 1very high high medium low very low
5. Rate your level of knowledge of and skills in the topic after participating in the event: 4
5 4 3 2 1very high high medium low very low
Explain:__________________________________________________________________________________________
6. How will you apply the project’s content and knowledge gained at your workplace? Please provide examples (e.g. develop new policy initiatives, organise trainings, develop work plans/strategies, draft regulations, develop new procedures/tools etc.).
Explain:______use and disseminate these knowledge in the training, workshop
7. What needs to be done next by APEC? Are there plans to link the project’s outcomes to subsequent collective actions by fora or individual actions by economies?
From China’s perspective, officials from both Energy and Agricultural Departments should be invited orinvolved in such future discussion.
8. How could this project have been improved? Please provide comments on how to improve the project, if relevant._____________As biofuel remains a controversial topics in some economies, or sometimes for some economies, there is a need for continued, repeated advocate to promote/defend bio fuels and for new agricultural/energy officials, who might not familiar with biofuel or do not attach importance to biofuel as compared with other energy products.
Participant information (identifying information is
optional): Name: USGrains BJ
Organisation/Economy:
Email: [email protected]
Gender: M / F
APEC Project Evaluation Survey: Seminar, Symposium, Workshop
APEC Project Name/Number: EWG 12 2015A
Date:
Instructions: Please indicate your level of agreement with the statements listed in the table below.
Strongly Agre Agree Disagree OMMENTS (Continue on back if necessar
The objectives of the training were clearly defined
x
The project achieved its intended objectives
x
The agenda items and topics covered were relevant
x
The content was well organized and easy to follow
x
Gender issues were sufficiently addressed during implementation
The trainers/experts or facilitators
were well prepared and knowledgeable about the topic
x
The materials distributed were useful
x
The time allotted for the training was sufficient.
x
1. How relevant was this project to you and your economy?
5 4 3 2 1very mostly somewhat a little not much
Explain:___________4_______________________________________________________________________________ it is important for economies in the region to learn from each other. For China, the ethanol program is mandatory only in some regions, while Thailand and the Philippines have a national mandatory program very well implemented. The policies and practices in these two economies are meaningful for Chinese policy makers.
2. In your view what were the project’s results/achievements?
E x p l a i n : K n o w l e d g e s h a r i n g a n d d i s c u s s i o n o n f i n d i n g s o l u t i o n s t o c o m m o n c h a l l e n g e s
3. What new skills and knowledge did you gain from this event?Explain:__________other economies experience, polices and practices
4. Rate your level of knowledge of and skills in the topic prior to participating in the event: 2
5 4 3 2 1very high high medium low very low
5. Rate your level of knowledge of and skills in the topic after participating in the event: 4
5 4 3 2 1very high high medium low very low
Explain:___________________________________________________________________________________________
6. How will you apply the project’s content and knowledge gained at your workplace? Please provide examples (e.g. develop new policy initiatives, organise trainings, develop work plans/strategies, draft regulations, develop new procedures/tools etc.).
Explain:______use and disseminate these knowledge in the training, workshop
7. What needs to be done next by APEC? Are there plans to link the project’s outcomes to subsequent collective actions by fora or individual actions by economies?
From China’s perspective, officials from both Energy and Agricultural Departments should be invited orinvolved in such future discussion.
8. How could this project have been improved? Please provide comments on how to improve the project, if relevant._______________As biofuel remains a controversial topics in some economies, or sometimes for some economies, there is a need for continued, repeated advocate to promote/defend bio fuels and for new agricultural/energy officials, who might not familiar with biofuel or do not attach importance to biofuel as compared with other energy products.
Participant information (identifying information
is optional): Name: USGrains BJ
Organisat ion/Economy: Email:
junyang. j [email protected]
Gender: M / F
Appendix IAPEC Project Evaluation Survey: Seminar, Symposium, Workshop
APEC Project Name/Number: EWG 12 2015A
Date: March 10, 2017
Instructions: Please indicate your level of agreement with the statements listed in the table below.
Strongly Agre Agree Disagree OMMENTS (Continue on back if necessar
The objectives of the training were clearly defined
√
The project achieved its intended objectives
√
The agenda items and topics covered were relevant
√
The content was well organized and easy to follow
√
Gender issues were sufficiently addressed during implementation
Neutral
The trainers/experts or facilitators
were well prepared and knowledgeable about the topic
√
The materials distributed were useful
√
The time allotted for the training was sufficient.
√
1. How relevant was this project to you and your economy?
5 4 3 2 1very mostly somewhat a little not much
Explain: Mostly relevant since it discussed most of the challenges in our economy including the biofuels use and its implementation.
next steps.
2. In your view what were the project’s results/achievements? Explain: The drafted road map
3. What new skills and knowledge did you gain from this event?Explain: I’ve become more aware on the current developments in the bioethanol sector and the present ethanol feedstocks being used by other economies.
4. Rate your level of knowledge of and skills in the topic prior to participating in the event:
5 4 3 2 1very high high medium low very low
5. Rate your level of knowledge of and skills in the topic after participating in the event:
5 4 3 2 1very high high medium low very low
Explain: Because I’ve learned something new
6. How will you apply the project’s content and knowledge gained at your workplace? Please provide examples (e.g. develop new policy initiatives, organise trainings, develop work plans/strategies, draft regulations, develop new procedures/tools etc.).
Explain: The knowledge gained will serve as an input to the continuous efforts of our office in the utilization of ethanol especially in developing plans for the improvement of ethanol usage.
7. What needs to be done next by APEC? Are there plans to link the project’s outcomes to subsequent collective actions by fora or individual actions by economies?I think the roadmap should be regularly updated based on individual economies ’ current situation especially
on the challenges that needs to be addressed in order to meet the target.
8. How could this project have been improved? Please provide comments on how to improve the project, if relevant. Provide assistance to economies who are meeting challenges in terms of implementation of bioethanol mandates, development of other sources of feedstock, its variety, technologies, etc.
Participant information (identifying information is
optional): Name:
Organisation/Economy:
Email:
Gender: M / F
Thank you. Your evaluation is important in helping us assess this project, improve project quality and plan
2. In your view what were the project’s results/achievements?
Explain:_A better understanding of ethanol policies and trade, and sustainable use of fuels. Also the important role of agricultural and tax policies and their role in bio fuel production.
3. What new skills and knowledge did you gain from this event?Explain:Better knowledge of how a public policy can be designed and of stakeholders to consider. A better knowledge of international trade and markets and their role in national policies
4. Rate your level of knowledge of and skills in the topic prior to participating in the event:
5 4 3 2 1very high x high medium low very low
5. Rate your level of knowledge of and skills in the topic after participating in the event:
5 4 3 2 1very high x high medium low very low
Explain:Althoug the event was a very good one, it would not be truth that my knowledge became very high. A lot of new ideas and experiences were shared and my knowledge on the topic increased, but didn´t make me an expert.
6. How will you apply the project’s content and knowledge gained at your workplace? Please provide examples (e.g. develop new policy initiatives, organise trainings, develop work plans/strategies, draft regulations, develop new procedures/tools etc.).
Explain:A new policy for biofuels must be designed in Mexico, according to energy reforms. This policy will have to be created with the aid of different stakeholders . Policy will include regulations, norms, incentives, etc.
7. What needs to be done next by APEC? Are there plans to link the project’s outcomes to subsequent collective actions by fora or individual actions by economies?
APEC shall promote more information and experience exchanges between members on sustainable fuel policies, follow up of current policies and lessons learnt by different participants.
8. How could this project have been improved? Please provide comments on how to improve the project, if relevant.
As personal interest, the sugar market information was of little interest, Maybe that could be shortened.
Participant information (identifying information is optional):
Name: Luis Alfonso Muñozcano Alvarez Organisation/Economy:
SENER (Energy Secretariat) México Email:
Gender: M / F MALE
Thank you. Your evaluation is important in helping us assess this project, improve project quality and plannext
APEC Project Evaluation Survey: Seminar, Symposium, Workshop
APEC Project Name/Number: EWG 12 2015A
Date:_March 19, 2017____________________________
Instructions: Please indicate your level of agreement with the statements listed in the table below.
Strongly A Agree Disagree COMMENTS (Continue on back if necessary)
The objectives of the training were clearly defined
V
The project achieved its intended objectives
V
The agenda items and topics covered were relevant
V
The content was well organized and easy to follow
V
Gender issues were sufficiently addressed during implementation
V
The trainers/experts or facilitators
V
were well prepared and knowledgeable about the topic
The materials distributed were useful
V
The time allotted for the training was sufficient.
V
1. How relevant was this project to you and your economy?
5 4 3 2 1very mostly somewhat a little not much
Explain: 3 -
2. In your view what were the project’s results/achievements?
Explain: The achievement in the presentation were clearly discussed
3. What new skills and knowledge did you gain from this event?
Explain: The comparison with my economy was clear enough ,that should be more investment must be increased in Ethanol
production 4. Rate your level of knowledge of and skills in the topic prior to participating in the event:
5 4 3 2 1very high high medium low very low
5. Rate your level of knowledge of and skills in the topic after participating in the event:
5 4 3 2 1very high high medium low very low
Explain: the topics were mostly interesting to be discussed further in my economy
6. How will you apply the project’s content and knowledge gained at your workplace? Please provide examples (e.g. develop new policy initiatives, organise trainings, develop work plans/strategies, draft regulations, develop new procedures/tools etc.).
Explain: organise trainings, develop work plans/strategies
7. What needs to be done next by APEC? Are there plans to link the project’s outcomes to subsequent collective actions by fora or individual actions by economies? Further progress in Ethanol can be more presented, and invited some Indonesian Business person and some Government person who in charge in Ethanol production.
8. How could this project have been improved? Please provide comments on how to improve the project, if relevant.No comment thank you________________________________________________________________________________________
Participant information (identifying information is optional):
Name:
Organisation/Economy:
Email:
Gender: M / F
Thank you. Your evaluation is
important in helping us assess this project, improve project quality and plan next steps.