Agronomic Performance of Some Exotic Tobacco Cultivars Under …€¦ · Country 2 C1 & 2 Country 3...
Transcript of Agronomic Performance of Some Exotic Tobacco Cultivars Under …€¦ · Country 2 C1 & 2 Country 3...
Agronomic Performance of Some
Exotic Tobacco Cultivars Under
the Zimbabwean Environmental
Conditions
R. T. Ruzane, F. Magama, S. Banana
and S. Dimbi
CORESTA CONFRENCE 2019
TOBACCO RESEARCH BOARD
KUTSAGA
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Presentation Outline
o Background
oMaterials and Methods
o Results
oConclusion
oAcknowledgements
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Background
o Cultivars play an important role in tobacco
production.
o Agronomic attributes of a cultivar are very
important to farmers and merchants
o Growers continuously demand new varieties
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Background
o Plant breeders to make sure that new
varieties are available to growers
o it’s important to assess the progress of local
breeding efforts relative to achievements
made by other breeders in order to identify
gaps in variety development.
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Objective
o To compare the
agronomic performance
of local and some exotic
tobacco cultivars under
the Zimbabwean
environmental
conditions
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Materials and Methods
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Research Site
o Kutsaga Research Station
o Located 16 Km South East of the CBD
o Longitude 310 13’ E, Latitude 170 91’ S
o Altitude of 1 480 m
oGranite sands
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Cultivars
o 18 varieties used
in trial ( 5 Countries)
o – Tested for 3 seasons
o Rain fed conditions
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Cultivars
Origin Code
Country 1 B1-B6
Country 2 C1 & 2
Country 3 Q1 & 2
Country 4 G1-3
Zimbabwe K RK26, K RK64, K RK66, K RK71, K RK72
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Design
o Experimental design
Randomised
complete block
design (RCBD) with 18
treatments in 3 blocks
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Cultural Practices
o Lands - early
ploughed (January
to end of March)
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Cultural Practices
o Fumigation done
prior
o Two supplementary
nematicides at
planting and at 6
weeks after planting
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Cultural Practices
o Compound C
(6:8:17) and
Ammonium Nitrate
fertilizers applied
(Rates based on soil
fertility tests)
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Cultural Practices
o Special emphasis on
CPAs
o All recommended
applied as
preventatives for foliar
diseases
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Measurements
o Yield
✓Leaf expansion
✓Stalk height
✓Yield data (kg/ha)
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Measurements
oQuality
✓Grade Index
✓Curing style
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Measurements
✓Season Quality
✓Root knot
damage
✓Leaf diseases
✓General
appearance
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Data analysis
o Data subjected to ANOVA
oGenStat 18th edition (2016, VSN
International) used
o Treatment means separated using the least
significance difference (LSD) at P<0.05
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Results
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Quality of Season 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr
Tem
p º
C
Ra
infa
ll (
mm
)
Month
Rainfall = 694.73 mm
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Quality of Season 2
0
5
10
15
20
25
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr
Tem
p º
C
Ra
infa
ll (
mm
)
Month
Rainfall = 1093.76 mm
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Quality of Season 3
0
5
10
15
20
25
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr
Tem
p º
C
Ra
infa
ll (
mm
)
Month
Rainfall = 673.07 mm
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Leaf expansion (largest leaf)
0
15
30
45
60
Lea
f Ex
pa
nsi
on
Cntry 2 Zimbabwe Cntry 4Cntry 1 Cntry 3
F-prob = <0.001
o Zim varieties generally had a larger leaf
o Country 3 varieties generally had a smaller leaf
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Leaf expansion (Penultimate)
0
15
30
45
60
Lea
f Ex
pa
nsi
on
Cntry 1 Cntry 2 Zimbabwe Cntry 3 Cntry 4
F-prob = 0.028
o B6, K RK64 & K RK72 had the highest geomean
o Country 3 varieties had the lowest geomean
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Stalk height (cm)
0
30
60
90
He
igh
t (c
m)
Cntry 1 Cntry 2 Zimbabwe Cntry 3 Cntry 4
F-prob = <0.001
o Country 1 & 3 varieties were short and compact
o Zim & Country 4 varieties were amongst the tallest
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
0
6
31
4 5 7
2
Gall-rating scale
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
0
6
31
4 5 7
2
8
Gall-rating scale
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
RKN Evaluation
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Sc
ore
(0
-8)
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Yield (Kg/ha)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Tota
l M
ass
(K
g/h
a)
Cntry 1 Cntry 2 Zimbabwe Cntry 3 Cntry 4
F-prob = 0.634
o K RK64, K RK66 and K RK71 had the best yield
o Yield ranged from 2585 – 3582 kg/ha
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Grade Index
0
15
30
45
60
75
Gra
de
in
de
x (
%)
Cntry 1 Cntry 2 Zimbabwe Cntry 3 Cntry 4
F-prob = 0.292
o All varieties had an acceptable grade index
(GI) of above 50%
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Curing Style
0
25
50
75
100
Pe
rce
nt
(%) Other Grades
orange
Lemon
Pale lemon
Cntry 1 Cntry 2 Zimbabwe Cntry 3 Cntry 4
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Curing Style
0
25
50
75
100
Pe
rce
nt
(%) Other Grades
orange
Lemon
Pale lemon
Cntry 1 Cntry 2 Zimbabwe Cntry 3 Cntry 4
o Exotic cultivars produced a higher proportion
of pale lemon styles
o Zim varieties had more lemon – orange styles
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Summary
o For leaf measurements, the Zim varieties
proved to be superior than some exotic
cultivars
oGenerally all varieties had acceptable yield
with K RK64, K RK66 and K RK71 being the
best variety
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Summary
oGrade index was statistically similar for all
cultivars
o Exotic cultivars succumbed to RKN
challenge
o Exotic cultivars produced a large proportion
of pale lemon styles while Zim cultivars had
predominantly lemon/orange styles
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Discussion
o Varieties are bred for specific environments
o Convergence of agronomic selection
parameters
o Performance of exotic cultivars are affected
in the absence of CPAs liberally applied
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Conclusions
o The Zimbabwean breeding programme is
highly robust
o Local varieties are more adapted to local
conditions
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
Acknowledgements
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA
THANK YOU
2019
_AP
31_R
uzan
e.pd
fA
P20
19 -
Doc
umen
t not
pee
r-re
view
ed b
y C
OR
ES
TA