Agenda Item 5 Capacity

19
Agenda Item 5 Capacity ICAO EUR Regional Performance Framework Workshop Moscow, Russian Federation, 29-30 May 2018 ICAO EUR/NAT Office 1

Transcript of Agenda Item 5 Capacity

Page 1: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

Agenda Item 5

Capacity

ICAO EUR Regional Performance Framework Workshop Moscow, Russian Federation, 29-30 May 2018

ICAO EUR/NAT Office 1

Page 2: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

KPA Capacity

Objective Ensure that Air Navigation Service capacity meets demand in en-route airspace and at airports

Indicators - Average ATFM delay per flight generated by the airspace volume (en-route)

- Average ATFM delay per flight in the main airports (to be identified by States in advance and based on the regional relevance)

2

Page 3: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

Please note • Indicators measure

– The location where the problem (capacity bottleneck) is, not where the delay is taken (departure airport)

– Performance of airspace volumes and airports, not flights • Despite the expression as a value “per flight”

– Within the Capacity KPA • Demand/capacity imbalance • Not capacity itself

• Limitations • Not designed to measure excess capacity • No data if airspace or airport does not participate in a centralised ATFM

process

3

ATFM regulation requested by ACC

Arrival Airport

Departure Airport

ACC anticipating capacity shortfall

ATFM

Aircraft held at dep. airport

Page 4: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

Calculation of indicator

• A flight might encounter multiple capacity bottlenecks along the route, however:

– All ATFM delay of a flight is attributed to most constraining “node”

• Aggregation of attributed ATFM delay by “node” – Delay is measured for nodes, not for flights

• ATFM delay caused by a “node” accumulates over time – Measurement: accumulated ATFM delay of a “node” by the end of the year

• Aggregation of “nodes” – Geographical aggregation of ATFM delay possible – Geographical aggregation of flights (entering node) not possible

• Indicator “average delay per flight” for a “node”: – Accumulated ATFM delay / number of flights through the “node” – Can be calculated at any aggregation level, for any time period

Flight delay Flight delay Single Flight delay

Flight at departure airport

Minutes of ATFM Delay

Node airspace, ACC or

destination airport

Delay accumulated by a Node ATFM regulation requested by ACC

Arrival Airport

Departure Airport

ACC anticipating capacity shortfall

NM

Aircraft held at dep. airport

Page 5: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

Code Description Examples of usage

ATC & Aerodrome Capacity

C ATC Capacity Demand exceeds the capacity; Planned staff

shortage

G Aerodrome Capacity Lack of parking; taxiway closure; areas (runways,

taxiways) closed for maintenance; demand exceeds

the declared airport capacity; runway configuration

(winds)

S ATC Staffing Unplanned staff shortage

ATC Other

V Environmental Issues Noise

I Industrial Action (ATC) Controllers’ strike

R ATC Routeing Phasing in of new procedures; ATFCM scenarios,

Network Solutions

T Equipment (ATC) Radar failure; RTF failure

Weather

W Weather Thunderstorm; low visibility; Strong cross winds,

CBs

D De-icing De-Icing

All other causes

A Accident/incident RWY23 closed due accident

E Equipment (non-ATC) Runway or taxiway lighting failure

M Airspace management Airspace availability; Military exercise

N Industrial Action (non-ATC) Firemen’s strike

O Other To be used only if no other reason can fit

P Special event European football cup; Heads of Government

meetings; Upgrade of ATM systems

Page 6: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

Data items Capacity

En-route ATFM delays (continental airspace)

B35Total en-route ATFM delay generated in the State (all causes)

(=B37+B38+B39+B40)Min/year

B36 Average ATFM delay per flight (=B35/A11) Min/flight

B37En-route ATFM delay generated in the State (ATC capacity

causes)Min/year

B38 En-route ATFM delay generated in the State (ATC other causes) Min/year

B39 En-route ATFM delay generated in the State (Weather causes) Min/year

B40 En-route ATFM delay generated in the State (All other causes) Min/year

B35bEn-route ATFM delay generated in the State (Cause unknown, use

only if B37, B38, B39 & B40 not available)Min/year

Airport ATFM delays

Airport identifier ICAO code

B41 Total number of IFR arrivals at the airport Arrivals/year

B42Total airport ATFM delay generated by the airport (all causes)

(=B44+B45+B46+B47)Min/year

B43 Average ATFM delay per arrival (=B42/B41) Min/arrival

B44Airport ATFM delay generated by the airport (ATC & aerodrome

capacity causes)Min/year

B45 Airport ATFM delay generated by the airport (ATC other causes) Min/year

B46 Airport ATFM delay generated by the airport (Weather causes) Min/year

B47 Airport ATFM delay generated by the airport (All other causes) Min/year

B42bAirport ATFM delay generated by the airport (Cause unknown,

use only if B44, B45, B46 & B47 not available)Min/year

6

Page 7: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

7

2 States account for more than 50% of all en-route ATFM delay in the EUR Region. The vast majority of States does not generate any significant delay.

Data item B35

Page 8: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

8

Looking at the indicator, improvements should primarily focus on the 3 States with the highest value. However for prioritisation of improvements the total amount of delay (item B35) should be considered as well.

Data item B36

Page 9: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

C (ATC Capacity) S (ATC Staffing)

9

Demand/capacity mismatch due to ATC capacity problems occurred in a limited number of States. 3 States cause two thirds of all such delay.

Data item B37

Page 10: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

I (Industrial Action (ATC)) R (ATC Routeing) T (Equipment (ATC)) V (Environmental Issues)

10

Demand/capacity mismatch due to “ATC other causes” is a phenomenon taking place in only 2 States.

Data item B38

Page 11: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

D (De-icing) W (Weather)

11

Demand/capacity mismatch due to weather causes is somewhat more widespread, but not a factor in most of the States.

Data item B39

Page 12: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

A (Accident/incident) E (Aerodrome Services) M (Airspace Management) N (Industrial Action (non-ATC)) P (Special event) O (Other)

12

50% of all en-route ATFM delay for “all other causes” in the EUR Region is generated by a single State.

Data item B40

Page 13: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

13

5 airports are causing 50% of all airport ATFM delay in the EUR Region.

Data items B42 & B41

Page 14: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

14

Looking at the indicator, improvements should primarily focus on the 10 airports with the highest value. However for prioritisation of improvements the total amount of delay (item B42) should be considered as well.

Data item B43

Page 15: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

C (ATC Capacity) G (Aerodrome Capacity) S (ATC Staffing)

15

Notice the scale on this and the next graphs: ATC & aerodrome capacity causes are the biggest contributor to airport ATFM delay.

Data item B44

Page 16: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

I (Industrial Action (ATC)) T (Equipment (ATC)) V (Environmental Issues)

16

Data item B45

Page 17: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

D (De-icing) W (Weather)

17

Notice the scale on this graph: weather causes are the second biggest contributor to airport ATFM delay. Also: more airports are affected by this (distribution with a longer tail).

Data item B46

Page 18: Agenda Item 5 Capacity

A (Accident/incident) E (Aerodrome Services) M (Airspace Management) N (Industrial Action (non-ATC)) P (Special event) O (Other)

18

Data item B47

Page 19: Agenda Item 5 Capacity