Agency focussed community services each with their own territory of need
-
Upload
imogene-montana -
Category
Documents
-
view
17 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Agency focussed community services each with their own territory of need
“Embedding co-production into the operating structures of human service agencies”
Time Banking Wales
• Agency focussed community services each with their own territory of need
• Little evidence of community development• Disadvantaged communities attract significant resources and
interventions from professional agencies and still have too many intractable problems
• Why are these communities not becoming safer, healthier, greener, more skilled or more sustainable?
• The missing ingredients are collaboration and co-production which defines services users as members working together with professionals, both parties mutually engaged to build better tomorrows for the common good.
The bad old days
• Agency focussed outcomes
Example: Environment (Gellideg Forest)
Agency in Control: Service User Discontent(one way conversation)
The bad old days
• Agency focussed outcomes : Agency in control
Example: Housing and Regeneration
Option 1 Demolition
Option 2 RenovationChange service design and service delivery
10 years after
The Big Divide
“We are dealing with people who have no initiative or civic pride” Newcastle Chief Planning Officer 1983
“Whatever we do for them they are never satisfied”Merthyr Planning Department
The ‘old’ professional agency/need driven model of public services
Community
Government
ProfessionalAgency
Person inNeed
Contribution via taxation
Funding for services
Assessment and support
Consumer
ClientCustomer
Beneficiary
Service User
The good new days
• Citizen’s voice
Example: Meals on Wheels
Change service design and service delivery
Citizen in Control: Meals on Legs
The Good New Days
• Citizen’s voice
Example: Domiciliary Care Support
Change service design and service delivery
Citizen in Control: Localised Care Support
Better Outcomes for Citizens
Co-production goes well beyond the idea of service user involvement. Co-production dissolves the distinction between providers and users of services, it offers to transform the dynamic between the professional and service user, putting an end to ‘them and us’. Participants are no longer ‘providers’ or ‘users’ instead people pool different kinds of knowledge and skills based on professional learning and lived experience to co-produce well being. A mutual partnership, citizens and agencies in MUTUAL CONTROL actively working together to collectively CO-PRODUCE mutually agreed outcomes.
Community
MemberCitizen
Professional AgencyContribution
via subscription
MutualismCo-production of services
Funding for co-productionof services
The Old Agencies – a trip back in time
Building Better Tomorrows1 Commissioning agents write co-production into their
service level agreements.2 Delivery agents become the ‘new social care mutuals’
which aim;• To be value-driven with mutuality at the core of their
operating structure• To be member focussed • To foster a culture where members relate to professionals
as part of a mutual concern, having a strong sense that they own and belong to the concern
• To promote and develop life long learning for members• To value and utilise the abilities of members
Building Better Tomorrows
• To listen and respond to the voice of members, to shape the design, delivery and improvement of services
• To support members and their supportive relatives develop a real sense of being a part of the community, its heritage (the best of the past) culture and citizenship.
• To treat all members with dignity and respect• To ensure that all members have access to new
technologies• To lead and build a federation with third and public sector
organisations in a locality, providing opportunities for members to become change agents for the co-production of ‘a new public good’
Together we can: the spirit of mutuality“For us empowerment meant the
use of collective action to transform society and so lift all of us
together”
Aneurin Bevan