Ageing Aircraft Industry perspective - egnos-africa.com SIASA... · Airbus design office and...
-
Upload
truongdang -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Ageing Aircraft Industry perspective - egnos-africa.com SIASA... · Airbus design office and...
SIASA project
This project is funded by the European Union and implemented by EASA.
TE.GEN.00409-001
Ageing Aircraft Industry perspective
Graeme Riddick Airworthiness Engineer (Structure and Systems installation) Technology Evolution – Impact on Airworthiness 23-24 September 2014, Windhoek, Namibia
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 2
Ageing aircraft - Agenda
Airbus certification & ageing aircraft
Corrosion
Widespread Fatigue Damage
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 3
Ageing aircraft - Certification
Airbus certification & ageing aircraft
Ageing aircraft safety rules
Fatigue critical structure
Maintenance
Corrosion
Widespread Fatigue Damage
Ageing aircraft safety rules
Regulatory context
History Mentioned by EASA
Airbus design office and certification teams working to respect delivery schedule
Working with EASA but also other authorities
AMC 20-20 Continuing Structural Integrity Programme
Maintenance Requirements for operators
In all cases Airbus ultimately supports all operators to comply with improved Ageing Aircraft Safety Rules.
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 4
AASR - Principles
Past
Review all modifications
Evaluate repairs
Future
Update ICA
All future modifications to include DTE
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 5
Approved Airbus Manuals
In the Airbus context what are “ICA” ?
AMM – Aircraft Maintenance Manual Contains General and Detailed inspection instructions
Requires inspection for corrosion damage
SRM – Structure Repair Manual Covers damage classification and repair
Corrosion prevention
ALS – Airworthiness Limitations Section Part 1 – Safe Life Items
Part 2 – Damage Tolerant Items
MRBR – Maintenance Review Board Report
NTM – Non-destructive Testing Manual
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 6
AMC 20-20
Identification of Fatigue Critical Structure “is structure that is susceptible to fatigue cracking that could lead to a catastrophic failure of an aircraft “
Repair Evaluation Guidelines “provide a process to establish damage-tolerance inspections for repairs that affect Fatigue Critical Structure “
Damage Tolerance Evaluation “a process that leads to a determination of maintenance actions necessary to detect or preclude fatigue cracking that could contribute to a catastrophic failure”
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 7
Defining the FCBS
Fatigue Critical Baseline Structures criteria: Metallic PSE
Structures whose failure or detachment could compromise continued safe flight and landing by an adverse effect on a PSE.
(as defined in §25.571)
Fatigue critical structure
The approved list was communicated to operators via the SRM (e.g. A320 SRM 51-11-12)
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 8
Fatigue Critical Baseline Structure (FCBS)
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 9
Complete structure
Primary structure Secondary structure
PSE
Metallic PSE •Secondary structure
part of FCBS
FCBS
• Composite PSE •Detail Design Points
Damage Tolerance Evaluation
For existing repairs
SRM updated where necessary to include
Repair Category
Inspection details where relevant
Repair Evaluation Guidelines to help operators evaluate existing repairs through one-time repair survey.
REG is added to the list of ICAs
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 10
Damage Tolerance Evaluation
For repairs via SBs and ADs
Review of all published SBs and ADs
For future repairs
Repair approval process that takes into account DT aspects when necessary
For modifications to FCS or creating new FCS
Same process
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 11
Support from the EASA
EASA has supported Airbus by reviewing the FCS lists and REG and recommending approval.
The SRM and all repair data is approved by Airbus under their EASA Part 21 Approval
All DTI for modifications/alterations are approved by EASA using the existing processes for modification approval
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 12
For operators and authorities
What operators must do:
Use REG for one-time repair survey
Systematic DTE for repairs/modifications/alterations performed to FCS
For authorities
Take AASR into account
All the work has been done – but it relies on your feedback and monitoring
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 13
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 14
Ageing aircraft - Agenda
Airbus certification & ageing aircraft
Corrosion
Widespread Fatigue Damage
Corrosion
Airbus design aimed at preventing corrosion
Corrosion is addressed in all maintenance documents
Covered by MRB tasks
Airbus ICA include a systematic approach to corrosion identification
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 15
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 16
Ageing aircraft - Agenda
Airbus certification & ageing aircraft
Corrosion
Widespread Fatigue Damage
Wide Spread Fatigue Agreement
Airbus and Authorities agree that
•Without intervention, MSD/MED is inevitable
• Inspection (Safety by Inspection) should not be relied on to prevent an occurrence of WFD
•Structural replacement/modification (Safety by Replacement) should be the primary line of defense against WFD - any inspections, if practical, are supplementary
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 17
Question
How long can an aircraft be safely operated ?
An airplane can be operated safely forever if the proper maintenance is performed
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 18
What is proper maintenance?
Changes & increases with time in service
Always based on a finite amount of knowledge
Analyses performed
Fatigue tests completed
Service experience (positive & negative)
Teardown inspections of high time airplanes
Proper maintenance for an airplane usually consists of maintenance actions that are developed proactively and reactively
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 19
Limit of validity
The LOV is how far out we can validate what the proper maintenance needs to be performed in order to prevent WFD.
Airbus approach to LOV:
Identify airplane configuration
Identify “candidate LOV”
Identify structure susceptible to WFD
Perform WFD evaluations
Propose LOV
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 20
Identifying WFD-susceptible structure
Subset of fatigue critical structure that has:
Similar details in the same element working at the same stress level
Similar adjacent elements working at the same stress level
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 21
Identifying WFD-susceptible structure
Using advisory material
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 22
Identifying WFD-susceptible structure
Airbus engineering analysis
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 23
•Frame foot fitting
•Frame segment
•Crack location
WFD Evaluations
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 24
WFD Evaluations
In-Service Experience
Positive findings from destructive inspection
Negative findings with large number of hours and cycles
Typically used for mature fleet (e.g. A300).
Important to report findings through the right channels to ensure that findings are taken into account by Airbus Engineering
Laboratory Testing
Must use fatigue testing (existing and new airplanes) Coupons, Components, Full-scale articles
With and without teardown inspections
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 25
A300 Approach
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 26
A300 Aircraft LOV Objective
(60 000FC)
WFD Evaluation
MSB ISB ALS Grace Period
Binding Schedule
Binding schedule
If the LOV depends on maintenance actions?
what happens?
• If service information for these maintenance
actions has not been issued, Airbus must submit a
list of those actions and a binding schedule for
development of these actions
Schedule:
• Mods available in a reasonable time frame before the need to apply it (design, plan, plan order kit, AD process)
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 27
Question
How long can an aircraft be safely operated ?
An airplane can be operated safely until LOV if the proper maintenance is performed
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 28
Conclusion
Ageing aircraft safety
Covered by aircraft certification
Requires proper maintenance
Requires feedback from operators and local authorities
Airbus
Has shown compliance to ageing aircraft safety requirements
Provides necessary document to operators to comply with maintenance requirements
Local authorities
Consider EASA requirements on ageing aircraft
23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 29
SIASA project
This project is funded by the European Union and implemented by EASA.
End slide
© AIRBUS S.A.S. 2014 All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. This document and all information contained herein is the sole property of AIRBUS S.A.S. No intellectual property rights are granted by the delivery of this document or the disclosure of its content. This document shall not be reproduced or disclosed to a third party without the express written consent of AIRBUS S.A.S. This document and its content shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied. The statements made herein do not constitute an offer. They are based on the mentioned assumptions and are expressed in good faith. Where the supporting grounds for these statements are not shown, AIRBUS S.A.S. will be pleased to explain the basis thereof. AIRBUS, its logo, A300, A310, A318, A319, A320, A321, A330, A340, A350, A380, A400M , ACJ are registered trademarks.