Ageing Aircraft Industry perspective - egnos-africa.com SIASA... · Airbus design office and...

30
SIASA project This project is funded by the European Union and implemented by EASA. TE.GEN.00409-001 Ageing Aircraft Industry perspective Graeme Riddick Airworthiness Engineer (Structure and Systems installation) Technology Evolution – Impact on Airworthiness 23-24 September 2014, Windhoek, Namibia

Transcript of Ageing Aircraft Industry perspective - egnos-africa.com SIASA... · Airbus design office and...

SIASA project

This project is funded by the European Union and implemented by EASA.

TE.GEN.00409-001

Ageing Aircraft Industry perspective

Graeme Riddick Airworthiness Engineer (Structure and Systems installation) Technology Evolution – Impact on Airworthiness 23-24 September 2014, Windhoek, Namibia

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 2

Ageing aircraft - Agenda

Airbus certification & ageing aircraft

Corrosion

Widespread Fatigue Damage

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 3

Ageing aircraft - Certification

Airbus certification & ageing aircraft

Ageing aircraft safety rules

Fatigue critical structure

Maintenance

Corrosion

Widespread Fatigue Damage

Ageing aircraft safety rules

Regulatory context

History Mentioned by EASA

Airbus design office and certification teams working to respect delivery schedule

Working with EASA but also other authorities

AMC 20-20 Continuing Structural Integrity Programme

Maintenance Requirements for operators

In all cases Airbus ultimately supports all operators to comply with improved Ageing Aircraft Safety Rules.

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 4

AASR - Principles

Past

Review all modifications

Evaluate repairs

Future

Update ICA

All future modifications to include DTE

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 5

Approved Airbus Manuals

In the Airbus context what are “ICA” ?

AMM – Aircraft Maintenance Manual Contains General and Detailed inspection instructions

Requires inspection for corrosion damage

SRM – Structure Repair Manual Covers damage classification and repair

Corrosion prevention

ALS – Airworthiness Limitations Section Part 1 – Safe Life Items

Part 2 – Damage Tolerant Items

MRBR – Maintenance Review Board Report

NTM – Non-destructive Testing Manual

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 6

AMC 20-20

Identification of Fatigue Critical Structure “is structure that is susceptible to fatigue cracking that could lead to a catastrophic failure of an aircraft “

Repair Evaluation Guidelines “provide a process to establish damage-tolerance inspections for repairs that affect Fatigue Critical Structure “

Damage Tolerance Evaluation “a process that leads to a determination of maintenance actions necessary to detect or preclude fatigue cracking that could contribute to a catastrophic failure”

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 7

Defining the FCBS

Fatigue Critical Baseline Structures criteria: Metallic PSE

Structures whose failure or detachment could compromise continued safe flight and landing by an adverse effect on a PSE.

(as defined in §25.571)

Fatigue critical structure

The approved list was communicated to operators via the SRM (e.g. A320 SRM 51-11-12)

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 8

Fatigue Critical Baseline Structure (FCBS)

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 9

Complete structure

Primary structure Secondary structure

PSE

Metallic PSE •Secondary structure

part of FCBS

FCBS

• Composite PSE •Detail Design Points

Damage Tolerance Evaluation

For existing repairs

SRM updated where necessary to include

Repair Category

Inspection details where relevant

Repair Evaluation Guidelines to help operators evaluate existing repairs through one-time repair survey.

REG is added to the list of ICAs

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 10

Damage Tolerance Evaluation

For repairs via SBs and ADs

Review of all published SBs and ADs

For future repairs

Repair approval process that takes into account DT aspects when necessary

For modifications to FCS or creating new FCS

Same process

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 11

Support from the EASA

EASA has supported Airbus by reviewing the FCS lists and REG and recommending approval.

The SRM and all repair data is approved by Airbus under their EASA Part 21 Approval

All DTI for modifications/alterations are approved by EASA using the existing processes for modification approval

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 12

For operators and authorities

What operators must do:

Use REG for one-time repair survey

Systematic DTE for repairs/modifications/alterations performed to FCS

For authorities

Take AASR into account

All the work has been done – but it relies on your feedback and monitoring

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 13

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 14

Ageing aircraft - Agenda

Airbus certification & ageing aircraft

Corrosion

Widespread Fatigue Damage

Corrosion

Airbus design aimed at preventing corrosion

Corrosion is addressed in all maintenance documents

Covered by MRB tasks

Airbus ICA include a systematic approach to corrosion identification

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 15

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 16

Ageing aircraft - Agenda

Airbus certification & ageing aircraft

Corrosion

Widespread Fatigue Damage

Wide Spread Fatigue Agreement

Airbus and Authorities agree that

•Without intervention, MSD/MED is inevitable

• Inspection (Safety by Inspection) should not be relied on to prevent an occurrence of WFD

•Structural replacement/modification (Safety by Replacement) should be the primary line of defense against WFD - any inspections, if practical, are supplementary

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 17

Question

How long can an aircraft be safely operated ?

An airplane can be operated safely forever if the proper maintenance is performed

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 18

What is proper maintenance?

Changes & increases with time in service

Always based on a finite amount of knowledge

Analyses performed

Fatigue tests completed

Service experience (positive & negative)

Teardown inspections of high time airplanes

Proper maintenance for an airplane usually consists of maintenance actions that are developed proactively and reactively

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 19

Limit of validity

The LOV is how far out we can validate what the proper maintenance needs to be performed in order to prevent WFD.

Airbus approach to LOV:

Identify airplane configuration

Identify “candidate LOV”

Identify structure susceptible to WFD

Perform WFD evaluations

Propose LOV

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 20

Identifying WFD-susceptible structure

Subset of fatigue critical structure that has:

Similar details in the same element working at the same stress level

Similar adjacent elements working at the same stress level

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 21

Identifying WFD-susceptible structure

Using advisory material

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 22

Identifying WFD-susceptible structure

Airbus engineering analysis

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 23

•Frame foot fitting

•Frame segment

•Crack location

WFD Evaluations

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 24

WFD Evaluations

In-Service Experience

Positive findings from destructive inspection

Negative findings with large number of hours and cycles

Typically used for mature fleet (e.g. A300).

Important to report findings through the right channels to ensure that findings are taken into account by Airbus Engineering

Laboratory Testing

Must use fatigue testing (existing and new airplanes) Coupons, Components, Full-scale articles

With and without teardown inspections

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 25

A300 Approach

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 26

A300 Aircraft LOV Objective

(60 000FC)

WFD Evaluation

MSB ISB ALS Grace Period

Binding Schedule

Binding schedule

If the LOV depends on maintenance actions?

what happens?

• If service information for these maintenance

actions has not been issued, Airbus must submit a

list of those actions and a binding schedule for

development of these actions

Schedule:

• Mods available in a reasonable time frame before the need to apply it (design, plan, plan order kit, AD process)

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 27

Question

How long can an aircraft be safely operated ?

An airplane can be operated safely until LOV if the proper maintenance is performed

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 28

Conclusion

Ageing aircraft safety

Covered by aircraft certification

Requires proper maintenance

Requires feedback from operators and local authorities

Airbus

Has shown compliance to ageing aircraft safety requirements

Provides necessary document to operators to comply with maintenance requirements

Local authorities

Consider EASA requirements on ageing aircraft

23-24 September 2014 Technology Evolution - Impact on Airworthiness, Windhoek, Namibia 29

SIASA project

This project is funded by the European Union and implemented by EASA.

End slide

© AIRBUS S.A.S. 2014 All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. This document and all information contained herein is the sole property of AIRBUS S.A.S. No intellectual property rights are granted by the delivery of this document or the disclosure of its content. This document shall not be reproduced or disclosed to a third party without the express written consent of AIRBUS S.A.S. This document and its content shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied. The statements made herein do not constitute an offer. They are based on the mentioned assumptions and are expressed in good faith. Where the supporting grounds for these statements are not shown, AIRBUS S.A.S. will be pleased to explain the basis thereof. AIRBUS, its logo, A300, A310, A318, A319, A320, A321, A330, A340, A350, A380, A400M , ACJ are registered trademarks.