Age Related Thresholds and Thoracic InjuryAge Related Thresholds and Thoracic Injury CIREN Public...
Transcript of Age Related Thresholds and Thoracic InjuryAge Related Thresholds and Thoracic Injury CIREN Public...
Age Related Thresholds and Age Related Thresholds and Thoracic InjuryThoracic Injury
CIREN Public MeetingCIREN Public MeetingMarch 25, 2008March 25, 2008
Toyota – Wake Forest UniversitySchool of Medicine
CIREN Center
Impact of Age on Thoracic InjuriesImpact of Age on Thoracic Injuries
Scope of the problemScope of the problemImpact of thoracic injuries on the elderlyImpact of thoracic injuries on the elderlyImpact of age on rib fractures and Impact of age on rib fractures and pulmonary contusion in CIRENpulmonary contusion in CIRENImpact of age on rib fractures and Impact of age on rib fractures and pulmonary contusion in NASS and NTDBpulmonary contusion in NASS and NTDBVolumetric assessment of pulmonary Volumetric assessment of pulmonary contusioncontusion
US Census, 2000US Census, 2000
Percent US Population Above 65 Years Old
0
5
10
15
20
25
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Year
Per
cent
(%)
Aging in AmericaAging in America
Rib fractures are most common thoracic Rib fractures are most common thoracic injury in the elderlyinjury in the elderlyPulmonary contusion is the most common Pulmonary contusion is the most common soft tissue injury of the thorax in the soft tissue injury of the thorax in the elderlyelderly
Effect of Age on ThoraxEffect of Age on Thorax
Less deformation in response to loadingLess deformation in response to loadingRib cage morphology changes with ageRib cage morphology changes with age–– U of Michigan, 2006 CIREN meetingU of Michigan, 2006 CIREN meeting
Bone demonstrates thin cortical shell and Bone demonstrates thin cortical shell and ““brittlebrittle”” material propertiesmaterial properties
Database SelectionDatabase Selection
++++
++++
++++++
Crash Crash datadata
++++++++++++++++++++NTDBNTDB
++++++++++++++NASSNASS
++++++++++++++++++++CIRENCIREN
++++++++++++++++++++++Local Local CIRENCIREN
Physiologic Physiologic datadata
Image Image analysisanalysis
Outcome Outcome datadata
DetailDetail# of # of casescases
DatabaseDatabase
AgeAge--Related Mortality ThresholdsRelated Mortality Thresholds
National Trauma Databank / CIREN studyNational Trauma Databank / CIREN studyIdentification of isolated injuries in NTDBIdentification of isolated injuries in NTDBCreation of Receiver Operator Creation of Receiver Operator Characteristic curvesCharacteristic curves–– Serial assessment of each ageSerial assessment of each age
Identification of age that maximizes Identification of age that maximizes sensitivity and specificity for determining sensitivity and specificity for determining mortalitymortality
Thorax Injury ThresholdsThorax Injury ThresholdsAGEInjury
41RIB CAGE, FRACTURE, FLAIL CHEST (UNSTABLE CHEST WALL), WITH LUNG CONTUSION
450264.4
63RIB CAGE, FRACTURE, 1 RIB, WITH HEMO/PNEUMOTHORAX450214.3
56RIB CAGE, FRACTURE, FLAIL (UNSTABLE CHEST WALL), BILATERAL450266.5
40LUNG, CONTUSION, BILATERAL441410.4
40THORACIC CAVITY INJURY NFS WITH HEMO/PNEUMOTHORAX442202.3
40RIB CAGE, FRACTURE, > 3 RIBS ON EACH OF TWO SIDES, WITH STABLE CHEST OR NFS, WITH HEMO/PNEUMO THORAX
450242.5
42RIB CAGE, FRACTURE, 2-3 RIBS ANY LOCATION OR MULTIPLE FRACTURES OF SINGLE RIB, WITH STABLE CHEST OR NFS WITH HEMO/PNEUMOTHORAX
450222.3
40RIB CAGE, FRACTURE, > 3 RIBS ON ONE SIDE AND <= 3 RIBS ON OTHER SIDE, STABLE CHEST OR NFS
450230.3
68LUNG, CONTUSION, UNILATERAL441406.3
42RIB CAGE, FRACTURE, > 3 RIBS ON ONE SIDE AND <= 3 RIBS ON OTHER SIDE, STABLE CHEST OR NFS, WITH HEMO/PNEUMO THORAX
450232.4
NTDB Injury ThresholdsNTDB Injury Thresholds
Based on large databaseBased on large databaseAges appear young but represent Ages appear young but represent observed inflection pointobserved inflection pointIndicative of progressive processIndicative of progressive processImpact of injury likely dependent on Impact of injury likely dependent on physiologic reservephysiologic reserve
Age Effect Controlling for AISAge Effect Controlling for AIS
To evaluate effects of age on thoracic To evaluate effects of age on thoracic injury severityinjury severityDatabase: NTDBDatabase: NTDBSeverity of injury score (AIS) for thoracic Severity of injury score (AIS) for thoracic injuries comparedinjuries compared–– Rib fractures, pulmonary contusionRib fractures, pulmonary contusionIsolated injuriesIsolated injuries–– Impact of multiple injuries not capturedImpact of multiple injuries not captured
Mortality by Thoracic Abbreviated Mortality by Thoracic Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)Injury Scale (AIS)
Mortality by Isolated Thoracic AIS in NTDB
05
101520253035404550
1 2 3 4 5
AIS
Perc
ent M
orta
lity
(%)
Mortality by Isolated Thoracic AIS in NTDB
05
101520253035404550
1 2 3 4 5
AIS
Perc
ent M
orta
lity
(%)
< 65 yo>= 65 yo
Mortality by Rib Fracture AISMortality by Rib Fracture AIS
Mortality by Isolated Rib Fracture AIS in NTDB
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1 2 3 4 5
AIS
Per
cent
Mor
talit
y (%
)
Mortality by Isolated Rib Fracture AIS in NTDB
02468
101214161820
1 2 3 4 5
AIS
Perc
ent M
orta
lity
(%)
< 65 yo>= 65 yo
Mortality by Pulmonary Contusion Mortality by Pulmonary Contusion AISAIS
Mortality by Isolated Pulmonary Contusion AIS in NTDB
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1 2 3 4 5
AIS
Perc
ent M
orta
lity
(%)
Mortality by Isolated Pulmonary Contusion AIS in NTDB
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1 2 3 4 5
AIS
Per
cent
Mor
talit
y (%
)
< 65 yo>= 65 yo
Thoracic Injuries Thoracic Injuries ––T/WFU CIRENT/WFU CIREN
T/WFU CIREN Center cases were reviewed T/WFU CIREN Center cases were reviewed to characterize thoracic injuries with to characterize thoracic injuries with respect to agerespect to age96 total cases96 total casesDetermination of rib fracture number (Determination of rib fracture number (ααAIS) AIS) and presence of pulmonary contusionand presence of pulmonary contusion–– Relationship with ageRelationship with age
T/WFUT/WFU--CIRENCIRENPatient Age According to Number of Rib Fractures in Patients
that Sustained Rib Fractures
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
3 or Fewer Rib Fractures Between 4 and 8 Rib Fractures Greater than 8 Rib Fractures
Ave
rage
Pat
ient
Age
(yea
rs)
T/WFUT/WFU--CIRENCIREN
Thoracic Injuries According to Age
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90
Patient Age (years)
Perc
ent o
f Pat
ient
s in
Eac
h Ag
e Ra
nge
% Patients with PulmonaryContusion in Each Age Range% Patients with Rib Fractures inEach Age Range
T/WFUT/WFU--CIRENCIREN
Thoracic Injury According to Age
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90
Patient Age (years)
% o
f CIR
EN P
atie
nts
with
Tho
raci
c In
jury
Patients with PCPatients with Rib Fractures
T/WFUT/WFU--CIRENCIREN
Age Comparison of Thoracic Injury
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Both Pulmonary Contusion andRib Fractures
ONLY Rib Fractures ONLY Pulmonary Contusion
Ave
rage
Pat
ient
Age
(yea
rs)
Thoracic Injuries in CIRENThoracic Injuries in CIREN
CIREN cases were evaluated to CIREN cases were evaluated to characterize thoracic injuries with respect characterize thoracic injuries with respect to ageto age1996 to 20061996 to 2006Rib fracture and pulmonary contusion Rib fracture and pulmonary contusion cases identifiedcases identified–– Relationship with ageRelationship with age–– Characterization of crash severityCharacterization of crash severity
Thoracic Injuries in CIRENThoracic Injuries in CIREN
Crash severity characterized by change in Crash severity characterized by change in velocity (Delta V)velocity (Delta V)–– Mild: Delta V Mild: Delta V 0 to 24.1 km/h0 to 24.1 km/h–– Moderate: Delta V Moderate: Delta V 24.2 to 48.2 km/h24.2 to 48.2 km/h–– Severe: Delta V Severe: Delta V ≥≥ 48.3 km/h48.3 km/h
Age Distribution in CIRENAge Distribution in CIREN
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+
Age (years)
Freq
uenc
y
Mean Age Mean Age --CIRENCIREN
Mean Age of Thoracic Injuries in CIREN
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
PC +, RibFX + PC +, RibFX - PC -, RibFX + PC -, RibFX -
Age
(yea
rs)
Mean Age of Thoracic Injuries in CIREN
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
PC +, RibFX + PC +, RibFX - PC -, RibFX + PC -, RibFX -
Age
(yea
rs)
Injury Distribution Injury Distribution --CIRENCIREN
Percent of Age Group with Rib Fractures and Pulmonary Contusion
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+
Age (years)
Perc
ent o
f Age
Gro
up (%
)
PC +, RibFX +PC +, RibFX -PC -, RibFX +PC -, RibFX -
Injury Distribution Injury Distribution ––CIRENCIRENby Crash Severityby Crash Severity
Percent of Age Group with Rib Fractures and Pulmonary Contusion in Low Severity Crashes
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+
Age (years)
Perc
ent o
f age
gro
up (%
)
PC +, RibFX +PC +, RibFX -PC -, RibFX +PC -, RibFX -
Injury Distribution Injury Distribution ––CIRENCIRENby Crash Severityby Crash Severity
Percent of Age Group with Rib Fractures and Pulmonary Contusion in Moderate Severity Crashes
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+
Age (years)
Perc
ent o
f age
gro
up (%
)
PC +, RibFX +PC +, RibFX -PC -, RibFX +PC -, RibFX -
Injury Distribution Injury Distribution ––CIRENCIRENby Crash Severityby Crash Severity
Percent of Age Group with Rib Fractures and Pulmonary Contusion in High Severity Crashes
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+
Age (years)
Perc
ent o
f age
gro
up (%
)
PC +, RibFX +PC +, RibFX -PC -, RibFX +PC -, RibFX -
Pulmonary Contusion Pulmonary Contusion --CIRENCIREN
Percent Pulmonary Contusion by Age Among Total Study Group and Rib Fracture Patients
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+
Age (years)
Perc
ent o
f stu
dy g
roup
(%)
Percent of total sample populationPercent of patients with rib fractures
Thoracic Injuries in NASSThoracic Injuries in NASS
NASS cases were evaluated to NASS cases were evaluated to characterize thoracic injuries with respect characterize thoracic injuries with respect to ageto age2000 2000 –– 2006 cases reviewed2006 cases reviewedRib fracture and pulmonary contusion Rib fracture and pulmonary contusion cases identifiedcases identified–– Relationship with ageRelationship with age–– Characterization of crash severityCharacterization of crash severity–– Impact of restraint systemsImpact of restraint systems
Injury Distribution Injury Distribution --NASSNASS
Percent of Age Group with Rib Fractures and Pulmonary Contusion
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+
Age (years)
Perc
ent o
f Age
Gro
up (%
)
PC +, RibFX +PC +, RibFX -PC -, RibFX +PC -, RibFX -
Injury Distribution Injury Distribution ––NASSNASSby Crash Severityby Crash Severity
Percent of Age Group with Rib Fractures and Pulmonary Contusion in Low Severity Crashes
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+
Age (years)
Perc
ent o
f Age
Gro
up (%
)
PC +, RibFX +PC +, RibFX -PC -, RibFX +PC -, RibFX -
Injury Distribution Injury Distribution ––NASSNASSby Crash Severityby Crash Severity
Percent of Age Group with Rib Fractures and Pulmonary Contusion in Moderate Severity Crashes
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+
Age (years)
Perc
ent o
f Age
Gro
up (%
)
PC +, RibFX +PC +, RibFX -PC -, RibFX +PC -, RibFX -
Injury Distribution Injury Distribution ––NASSNASSby Crash Severityby Crash Severity
Percent of Age Group with Rib Fractures and Pulmonary Contusion in High Severity Crashes
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+
Age (Years)
Perc
ent o
f Age
Gro
up (%
)
PC +, RibFX +PC +, RibFX -PC -, RibFX +PC -, RibFX -
Pulmonary Contusion Pulmonary Contusion ––NASSNASS
Percent Pulmonary Contusion by Age Among Total Study Group and Rib Fracture Patients
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+
Age (years)
Perc
ent s
tudy
pop
ulat
ion
(%)
Percent of total sample populationPercent of patients with rib fractures
Rib Fractures Rib Fractures --NASSNASS
n = 9987, 4822, 1779
Percent Rib Fractures by Age and Delta V
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
Low Moderate High
Crash Severity
Perc
ent R
ib F
ract
ure
(%)
Age < 40
Age 40 - 64
Age >= 65
Percent Rib Fractures by Age and Delta V
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
Low Moderate High
Crash Severity
Perc
ent R
ib F
ract
ure
(%)
Age < 40
Age 40 - 64
Age >= 65
Rib Fractures Rib Fractures --NASSNASS
Percent Rib Fractures by Delta Vand Restraint Category: Age >= 65
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Low Moderate High
Crash Severity
Perc
ent R
ib F
ract
ure
(%)
Unrestrained
Seatbelt
Airbag
Both Restraints
Percent Rib Fractures by Delta Vand Restraint Category: Age < 40
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Low Moderate High
Crash Severity
Perc
ent R
ib F
ract
ure
(%)
Unrestrained
Seatbelt
Airbag
Both Restraints
Pulmonary Contusion Pulmonary Contusion --NASSNASS
n = 9987, 4822, 1779
Percent Pulmonary Contusion by Age and Delta V
0
5
10
15
20
Low Moderate High
Crash Severity
Per
cent
Pul
mon
ary
Cont
usio
n (%
)
Age < 40
Age 40 - 64
Age >= 65
Pulmonary Contusion Pulmonary Contusion --NASSNASS
Percent Pulmonary Contusion by Delta Vand Restraint Category: Age < 40
0
5
10
15
20
Low Moderate High
Crash Severity
Perc
ent P
ulm
onar
y C
ontu
sion
(%)
Unrestrained
SeatbeltAirbag
Both Restraints
Percent Pulmonary Contusion by Delta Vand Restraint Category: Age >= 65
0
5
10
15
20
Low Moderate High
Crash Severity
Per
cent
Pul
mon
ary
Con
tusi
on (%
)
Unrestrained
Seatbelt
Airbag
Both Restraints
Pulmonary Contusion Pulmonary Contusion --NASSNASS
n = 623, 695, 423
Percent Pulmonary Contusion Per Rib Fracture by Age and Delta V
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Low Moderate High
Crash Severity
Per
cent
Pul
mon
ary
Con
tusi
on (%
)
Age < 40
Age 40 - 64
Age >= 65
Pulmonary Contusion Pulmonary Contusion --NASSNASS
This needs further investigation
Percent Pulmonary Contusion per Rib Fracture by Delta V and Restraint Category: Age >= 65
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Low Moderate High
Crash Severity
Perc
ent P
ulm
onar
y C
ontu
sion
(%)
Unrestrained
Seatbelt
Airbag
Both Restraints
Percent Pulmonary Contusion per Rib Fracture by Delta Vand Restraint Category: Age < 40
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Low Moderate High
Crash Severity
Perc
ent P
ulm
onar
y C
ontu
sion
(%)
Unrestrained
SeatbeltAirbag
Both Restraints
Incidence within Thoracic Injury Cohort Incidence within Thoracic Injury Cohort --NTDBNTDB
Incidence of PC and Rib FX Among Patients Who Sustained At Least One of These
01020304050607080
15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85
Age Midpoint
Perc
ent W
ithin
Gro
up
PC+RIB+PC+RIB-PC-RIB+
Injury Incidence Injury Incidence --NTDBNTDB
Incidence of PC and Rib FX Among All MVC Patients
0
20
40
60
80
100
15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85Age Midpoint
Per
cent
With
in
Gro
up
PC+RIB+
PC+RIB-
PC-RIB+
PC-RIB-
Mortality of Chest Injuries Mortality of Chest Injuries --NTDBNTDB
Mortality Rate by Injury Combination and Age
05
10152025303540
15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85
Age Midpoint
Mor
talit
y R
ate PC+RIB+
PC+RIB-
PC-RIB+
PC-RIB-
Logistic Regression Logistic Regression --NASSNASS
Determination of independent effect of Determination of independent effect of variables on rib fractures and pulmonary variables on rib fractures and pulmonary contusioncontusionUnivariateUnivariate assessment to determine assessment to determine inclusion variablesinclusion variablesStepwise multivariate logistic regressionStepwise multivariate logistic regression–– Significance: p < 0.05Significance: p < 0.05
Logistic Regression Logistic Regression ––Rib FracturesRib Fractures
0.040.040.71 0.71 –– 0.990.990.840.84SeatbeltSeatbelt0.010.010.69 0.69 –– 0.960.960.810.81AirbagAirbagNSNSRolloverRollover< 0.0001< 0.00011.14 1.14 –– 1.291.291.221.22IntrusionIntrusion0.00010.00011.004 1.004 –– 1.0141.0141.011.01Delta VDelta V< 0.0001< 0.00010.992 0.992 –– 0.9970.9970.990.99Vehicle weightVehicle weightNSNSGCSGCS< 0.0001< 0.00011.005 1.005 –– 1.0131.0131.011.01Pt WeightPt WeightNSNSPt HeightPt Height< 0.0001< 0.00011.08 1.08 –– 2.02.01.091.09ISSISS< 0.0001< 0.00011.04 1.04 –– 1.051.051.051.05AgeAge
pp--valuevalue95 % Confidence 95 % Confidence IntervalInterval
Odds RatioOdds RatioVariableVariable
ROC = 0.90, GOF = < 0.0001
Logistic Regression Logistic Regression ––Pulmonary ContusionPulmonary Contusion
NSNSSeatbeltSeatbeltNSNSAirbagAirbagNSNSRolloverRollover< 0.0001< 0.00011.13 1.13 –– 1.321.321.221.22IntrusionIntrusionNSNSDelta VDelta V0.020.020.994 0.994 –– 0.9990.9990.9960.996Vehicle weightVehicle weightNSNSGCSGCSNSNSPt WeightPt WeightNSNSPt HeightPt Height< 0.0001< 0.00011.06 1.06 –– 1.071.071.061.06ISSISSNSNSAgeAge
pp--valuevalue95 % Confidence 95 % Confidence IntervalInterval
Odds RatioOdds RatioVariableVariable
ROC = 0.90, GOF = < 0.0001
T/WFU CIREN PC DataT/WFU CIREN PC Data
5656Air bag deployment Air bag deployment (%)(%)8.48.4Mean CT scan time Mean CT scan time
postpost-- crash (hrs)crash (hrs)
6161Seat belt usage (%)Seat belt usage (%)50, 1750, 17Incidence of Incidence of pneumothorax, pneumothorax, hemothoraxhemothorax (%)(%)
7878Occupant position, Occupant position, driver (%)driver (%)7272Incidence of rib Incidence of rib
fractures (%)fractures (%)
3939±±1717Average patient age Average patient age (yrs)(yrs)28, 33, 3928, 33, 39Percent left, right, Percent left, right,
bilateral contusion (%)bilateral contusion (%)
1.3:11.3:1Male: Female ratioMale: Female ratio14.614.6Mean percent high Mean percent high radiopacity lung tissue radiopacity lung tissue (%)(%)
Distribution of components contacted Distribution of components contacted by PC+ cases T/WFU CIRENby PC+ cases T/WFU CIREN
0
3
6
9
Airbag
Center
cons
oleIns
trumen
t Pan
elNea
r side
B-pi
llar
Near s
ide do
or
Seat b
eltStee
ring w
heel
Num
ber o
f Pat
ient
s
Delta V, MPH
PDOF, Degrees
PDOF and DeltaPDOF and Delta--V V in T/WFU CIREN in T/WFU CIREN
PC+ casesPC+ cases
Distribution of the impact mode for Distribution of the impact mode for PC+ cases T/WFU CIRENPC+ cases T/WFU CIREN
11%
28%
50%
11%Far side impactFrontal impactNear side impactRollover
Motivation for future researchMotivation for future research
Strategies for mitigation &/or prevention Strategies for mitigation &/or prevention of PC require knowledge about PC Volume of PC require knowledge about PC Volume (outcome data)(outcome data)–– Volume, spatial distributionVolume, spatial distribution
Also require knowledge about exposure Also require knowledge about exposure (crash data)(crash data)CIREN is the place to get these togetherCIREN is the place to get these together
CT Segmentation Algorithm
Categories of Lung Tissue for Segmentation Algorithm
Damaged lung, not aerated
Contusion, atelectasis, aspiration, etc
350 HU to 3071 HU*
High attenuation
Aerated lung, uninvolved in trauma
Functional lung tissue
-1024 HU to 351 HU*
Lung attenuation
This is not lung tissue, it is trapped air
Pneumothorax-1024 HU*Low attenuation
AssumptionMedical Description
HU Description
Term Used
M. Daly et al., Clinical Imaging, 2007 (in press)
CT Segmentation Algorithm
1. Original CT scan
2. Select all pixels with in 200 HU of selected pixel
CT Segmentation Algorithm
CT Segmentation Algorithm
3. Edit until the entire chest cavity is selected, the resulting mask is the Total Chest Cavity mask
Lung Attenuation-1024 < HU ≤ -351
Algorithm Continued
Partition Total Chest Cavity into:• Low Attenuation Pixel set• Lung Attenuation Pixel set• High Attenuation Pixel set
Low AttenuationHU = -1024
High AttenuationHU ≥ -350
Calculation of Percent Pulmonary Contusion
Percent PC =
High Attenuation Volume
Total Lung Volume
Three Dimensional Reconstruction, Mimics
High AttenuationVolume
Lung AttenuationVolume
+
Contusion Characterization and CT-FEA Registration Method
• Segmented Lung showing PC and normal tissue•Determine spatial distribution of PC from radiology in A-P, M-L, H-F
Gayzik et al., Stapp Car Crash Journal, 2007
CT Reconstruction FEA model showing predicted contusion
Spatial distribution of PC from segmentation
can be used in determining FEA-
based injury metrics
• Lung model and PC threshold developed from CT
T/WFU CIREN Elderly Pulmonary T/WFU CIREN Elderly Pulmonary Contusion Contusion –– Case 85Case 85
75 yr old female75 yr old femaleDriver (belted, airbag Driver (belted, airbag deployed)deployed)Frontal impact with Frontal impact with another vehicleanother vehiclePDOF = 350 degreesPDOF = 350 degreesDelta V= 42.3 mphDelta V= 42.3 mph
MAIS= 4MAIS= 4ISS= 18ISS= 18IPC for thoracic IPC for thoracic injuries listed as injuries listed as steering wheelsteering wheelInjuries Included:Injuries Included:–– Right pulmonary Right pulmonary
contusioncontusion–– Bilateral Rib Fractures Bilateral Rib Fractures
(R2(R2--8, L28, L2--3)3)
PDOF CIREN 085PDOF CIREN 085
-1
1
-1 1
PDOF350°
-1
1
-1 1
PDOF350°
Radiological investigation of interaction between rib fractures
and pulmonary contusion
For WFU CIREN patients with Rib Fx and PC in nearside and frontal
crash
Lung Contusion
Rib Fractures
Pneumothorax
• Case occupant: Driver, 60, male
• Thorax Loads B-Pillar
• Crush = 33cm, PDOF = 290, Delta V = 19.4 kph
• Restraint = Seat belt
• PC by Vol = 6%
Case 1: Nearside impact
Area of detail:Load pathL
R
F
B
Lung Contusion
Rib Fractures (Right side 6th -10th)
• Case occupant: Driver, female, 79
• Thorax Loads Seat Belt
• Crush = 27 cm, PDOF = 0, Delta V = 37.2 kph
• Restraint = Seat belt
• PC by vol = 33%
Case 2: Frontal impact
Area of detail:
LR
ConclusionsConclusionsIncidence of rib fracture is greater with Incidence of rib fracture is greater with ageageAge not a factor in incidence of PCAge not a factor in incidence of PCMortality higher despite lower incidence of Mortality higher despite lower incidence of PCPCClear effect of airbag / seatbelt in Clear effect of airbag / seatbelt in mitigating Rib mitigating Rib FxFxHigher crash severity result in increased Higher crash severity result in increased rib rib fxfx & pc independent of age& pc independent of age
Future DirectionFuture Direction
Chest wall injuries in the elderly are a Chest wall injuries in the elderly are a substantial problem with much substantial problem with much opportunity for improvementopportunity for improvementFurther characterization of the mechanism Further characterization of the mechanism of chest wall injuriesof chest wall injuriesIdentification of the involvement of Identification of the involvement of restraint systems on chest wall injuriesrestraint systems on chest wall injuries
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsToyota Motor North America for sponsorship of our Toyota Motor North America for sponsorship of our CIREN centerCIREN centerWork was performed for the Crash Injury Research and Work was performed for the Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) Project at Wake Forest Engineering Network (CIREN) Project at Wake Forest University School of Medicine in cooperation with the University School of Medicine in cooperation with the United States Department of Transportation/National United States Department of Transportation/National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Highway Traffic Safety Administration (USDOT/NHTSA).(USDOT/NHTSA). Funding has been provided by Toyota Funding has been provided by Toyota Motor North America Inc. under Cooperative Agreement Motor North America Inc. under Cooperative Agreement Number DTNH22Number DTNH22--0505--HH--61001.61001. Views expressed are Views expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the views of those of the authors and do not represent the views of any of the sponsors or NHTSA.any of the sponsors or NHTSA.
Toyota – Wake Forest UniversitySchool of Medicine
CIREN Center