Age-related osteoporosis and fragility fractures Robert J. Pignolo, M.D., Ph.D. Assistant Professor...
-
Upload
gabriella-park -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Age-related osteoporosis and fragility fractures Robert J. Pignolo, M.D., Ph.D. Assistant Professor...
Age-related osteoporosis and fragility fractures
Robert J. Pignolo, M.D., Ph.D.Assistant ProfessorUniversity of Pennsylvania School of MedicineDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatric MedicineFellow, Institute on Aging
Age-related osteoporosis and fragility fractures
Impact Mechanisms of Bone Loss Diagnosis Current Treatment
Age-related osteoporosis and fragility fractures
ImpactImpact Mechanisms of Bone Loss Diagnosis Current Treatment
Occurrence of Low Bone Mass and Osteoporosis
Currently estimated to affect 44 million U.S. women and men aged 50 and older.
By 2010, it is estimated that this number will exceed 52 million and by 2020, over 61 million.
In 2002, it was estimated that over 10 million people had osteoporosis, women accounting for about 80% of cases.
One in two women and one in four men over age 50 will have an osteoporosis-related fracture in their lifetime.
National Osteoporosis Foundation, February 2002
Functional Impact of Osteoporosis Pain, dependence, and depression.
Skeletal deformities, vertebral fractures > hip fractures. Women with a history of vertebral or hip fractures have
more difficulty with bending, lifting, reaching, walking, and ascending and descending stairs and experience impairment in dressing, cooking, shopping, and housework.
~40% of hip fracture survivors are able to return to their prior level of ADLs, whereas only 25% return to their prefracture level for IADLs.
~15-25% of patients with hip fractures requires institutionalization.
National Osteoporosis Foundation, February 2002
Osteoporosis and Fragility Fractures Up to 95% of fractures in patients > 75 years old
and 80-90% of those 60-74 who are hospitalized for a fracture can be attributed to osteoporosis.
Less than 15% of those with recent fragility fractures are evaluated and treated for osteoporosis.
Risk of future fracture increases 1.5-9.5-fold following a fragility fracture.
Bouxsein ML et al. JAAOS 12: 385-395 (2004)
Age-related osteoporosis and fragility fractures
Impact Mechanisms of Bone LossMechanisms of Bone Loss Diagnosis Current Treatment
Mechanisms of Osteoporosis
AGINGEastell, R, in Primer on the Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism, Ch 50, 2003
Inadequate accumulationof bone in young life
Low peak bone mass
Excessive rates of bone loss Osteoporosis
Deterioration in bone microarchitecture
Decreased BMD
Determinants of Peak Bone Mass Genetic Factors
50-85% of bone mass variance
Polymorphisms or mutations in BMP2 COL1A1 Vitamin D receptor LRP5
Non-Genetic Factors diet/calcium intake low body weight at
maturity & at 1 year sedentary lifestyle delayed puberty
Eastell, R, in Primer on the Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism, Ch 50, 2003
A.
B.
C.
Bone remodeling
Liver
Osteoblast
Osteoblast
Monocyte/Macrophage
CFU-F Osteoclast
M-CSF
M-CSF
M-CSF
Bone
BMPs, TGFβs, IGFs, FGFs
OPG
RANKL
RANKL
RANK
From Pignolo, RJ & Kaplan, FS, Bone Biology in Interventional Spine (2007)
Coupling of bone formation to resorption
Mechanisms of bone Loss: Uncoupling
Low-turnoverbone loss
High-turnoverbone loss
Normal BoneTurnover(Skeletal
Homeostatis)
High bone massPhenotype
Osteopetrosis
Bone Resorption
Bone formation
HypogonadismThyrotoxicosis
HyperparathyroidismCytokine Excess
AgingDisuse
SteroidsCalcineurin inhibitors
Skeletal metastasesPaget’s disease
Rheumatoid arthritisPeriodonitis
Based on Zaidi, M Nat. Med. 13: 791-801 (2007)
Mechanisms of Age-Related Bone Loss
Bone Loss
Remodeling Imbalance
Uncoupling of BoneFormation & Resorption
Random Remodeling Errors
↑PTH
↓ IntestinalCa resorption
↓ Vitamin D
↓ Renal Ca Resorption
↓ Estrogen
↑↓Local GFs & cytokines
ImpairedOsteoblast Function
OsteoblastSenescence
↓ GH
↓ Physical Activity
↑Relative Osteoclast Activity
↑Activation Frequency
Eastell, R, in Primer on the Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism, Ch 50, 2003
High Vulnerability
Low Vulnerability
Predisposing Factors¹
Higher Intensity Trauma
Lower Intensity Trauma
Precipitating Factors²
Disuse Osteoporosis[Bed rest/bed-bound Status > 6 months]
History of Prior Fracture
Improper TransferTechniques
Poor Nutritional Status[Albumin < 3.0]
BMI < 20
Transfers
Positional Adjustment
Spontaneous
Predisposing and Precipitating Factors in Minimal Trauma Fractures
Advanced Age
¹ Based on representative cases, cases reviewed, and literature review .
² Based on most common mechanisms.
Age-related osteoporosis and fragility fractures
Impact Mechanisms of Bone Loss DiagnosisDiagnosis Current Treatment
Definition
Systemic disease Low bone mass Microarchitectural
deterioration of bone tissue
Increase in bone fragility
Increase in susceptibility to fracture
Diagnosis of exclusion
Risk Factors Associated with Osteoporosis
Family history of osteoporosis or fracture
Lifelong low calorie intake
Personal history of fracture as an adult
Poor health/frailty Increasing age Immobilization Early menopause (< 45
years old) Sedentary lifestyle
Late menarche (>16 years old)
Thin body frame or low body weight
Amenorrhea or irregular menstrual periods Calcium/vitamin D-deficient diet
Female sex Heavy alcohol use White or Asian ancestry Cigarette smoking
NIH Consensus Development Panel: Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 285:785-95, 2001
Medical Causes of Secondary Osteoporosis
_____________________________________________________________________
Secondary Causes of Low Bone Density _____________________________________________________________________
Endocrine Hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, Cushing'ssyndrome, diabetes mellitus, prolactinoma, estrogendeficiency, hypogonadism (men)
Rheumatologic Rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, idiopathicscoliosis, sarcoidosis
Gastrointestinal/ Malabsorption, hepatobiliary dysfunction, vitamin DNutritional deficiency, parenteral nutrition
Hematological/ Mastocytosis, hemolytic anemia, malignacy (general),Oncological multiple myeloma, hemophilia, thalassemia
Renal Idiopathic hypercalciuria (on low calcium diet), renalosteodystrophy
Psychiatric Eating disorders (anorexia, bulimia), depression
Genetic Congenital porphyria, osteogenesis imperfecta, osteoporosis-pseudoglioma
Other Paget's disease, amyloidosis, epidermolysis bullosa,hemochromotosis, hypophosphatasia, multiple sclerosis
_____________________________________________________________________
Fitzpatrick LA, Mayo Clinic Proceedings 77:453-68 (2002)
Pharmacologic Causes of Secondary Osteoporosis
• Glucocorticoids • Anticonvulsants• Lithium • Tamoxifen (premenopausal)• Antacids (chronic use) • Vitamin A• Heparin • Methotrexate• Gonadotropin-releasing hormone • Warfarin agonist or antagonist • Excessive thyroid supplementation• Phenothiazines • Aluminum-containing medications• Cytotoxic drugs • Organ transplant therapy
Dawson-Hughes, B, NEJM 345:989- 91 (2001)
Diagnosis of Osteoporosis
Skeletal History and Risk Factor Assessment
Screening Laboratory Tests
Physical Examination
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Testing
Skeletal History and Risk Factor Assessment Risk Factors for
Osteoporosis and Fractures
Known Secondary Causes of Low Bone Mass/Fractures
Independent Risk Factors for Fractures Impaired neuromuscular
function Decreased visual acuity Sedative/hypnotic drug
use Frequent falls
Kleerekoper M, Evaluation of the patient with osteoporosis or at risk for osteoporosis. In Osteoporosis, 2nd ed., 2001
Interaction between BMD and risk factors for the prediction of hip fracture
Risk factors: age > 80; maternal history of hip fracture; any fracture (except hip fracture) since the age of 50; fair, poor, or very poor health; previous hyperthyroidism; anticonvulsant therapy; current long-acting benzodiazepine therapy; current weight less than at the age of 25; height at the age of 25 < 168 cm; caffeine intake more than the equivalent of two cups of coffee per day; on feet 4 hours a day; no walking for exercise; inability to rise from chair without using arms; lowest quartile of depth perception; lowest quartile of contrast sensitivity; and pulse rate>80 per minute.
Cummings, SR et al., NEJM 332: 767-73 (1995)
Physical Examination
Detection of vertebral fracturesa. Height lossb. Upright posture becomes impossible (Dowager’s hump)c. Pulmonary volume loss due to anterior wedging of spined. 12th rib rests on iliac creste. Narrowed gap between ribs and iliumf. Protruding abdomeng. Distension, constipation, early satiety, eructationOther:
Paravertebral muscle spasmVertebral tenderness
Kleerekoper M, Evaluation of the patient with osteoporosis or at risk for osteoporosis. in Osteoporosis, 2nd ed., 2001
Physical Examination (cont.)
Assessment of Fall/Fracture Risk Ability to rise from chair
w/o using arms Resting pulse >80 Poor visual acuity Gait dysfunction,
including balance Longer hip-axis length
R/O Secondary Causes Bony deformities of RA Stigmata of chronic
alcoholism & liver disease
Scars suggesting thyroid/ parathyroid surgery
Skin changes consistent with endocrinopathies
Kleerekoper M, Evaluation of the patient with osteoporosis or at risk for osteoporosis. in Osteoporosis, 2nd ed., 2001
Screening Laboratory Tests
Screening laboratory studies, incl. CBC, chem7, Ca, Mg, P, alb, LFTs, GGT, TSH, serum testosterone/LH, 25-OH vitamin D
renal osteodystrophy (↓Cr, ↓Ca, ↑P)1o hyperparathyroidism (↑Ca); check PTH, vit. D metabolitespossible malnutrition (↓Ca, ↓P, ↓alb, ↓Hgb w/ ↓↑MCV)BM malignancy/infiltration (↓Hgb, ↓WBC, ↓PLT)osteomalacia (↓P, ↓/low nL Ca, ↑alkP)hypogonadism (↓T, ↑LH, ↑FSH) vitamin D insufficiency (early sl. ↓P, ↑alkP)
Kleerekoper M, Evaluation of the patient with osteoporosis or at risk for osteoporosis. in Osteoporosis, 2nd ed., 2001
Screening Laboratory Tests (cont.)
Kleerekoper M, Evaluation of the patient with osteoporosis or at risk for osteoporosis. in Osteoporosis, 2nd ed., 2001
Screening laboratory studies, incl.CBC, chemistries, Ca, Mg, P, alb, LFTs,GGT, TSH, total T/LH, iPTH, 25(OH)vitamin D
24h urine on adequate Ca
intake, if nL screening
low urine Ca (< 50mg): vit. D deficiency osteomalacia malabsorption (e.g., celiac sprue)
include Cr, and Na 25-OH vit. D level,
ferritin, carotene, anti-gliadin or anti- endomyseal Abs
high urine Ca (>300mg): renal tubular Ca leak [> 4mg/kg] absorptive hypercalciuria
excessive bone resorption(malignancy, hyperparathyroid,hyperthyroid, Paget's disease)high sodium diet
Yield of lab testing to identify secondary causes of bone loss in otherwise healthy postmenopausal women
In women without a history of diseases or medications known to adversely affect bone, 32% had disorders of calcium metabolism (hypercalciuria, malabsorption, hyperparathyroidism, vitamin D deficiency)
Measurement of 24h urine calcium, serum calcium, PTH, and TSH (in those on thyroid replacement) would have been sufficient to diagnose 85% of underlying causes
Tannenbaum, C et al J. Clin Endo. Metabol. 87: 4431-4437 (2002)
Special Laboratory TestsBMD Testing,T-score < -2.5
Screening Lab Studies
Z-score < -2.0 orNo major risk factors SPEP/UPEP, 24h urine for free cortisol or overnight
DEX supression test, t/c bone alkP or acidP, osteocalcin or pyridinoline crosslinks of type 1 collagen, BM biopsy, urine histamine
Kleerekoper M, Evaluation of the patient with osteoporosis or at risk for osteoporosis. in Osteoporosis, 2nd ed., 2001
_______________________________________________________________________
Technique Common Sites Time for Radiation Prediction of Evaluated Procedure Exposure Fracture Risk
(minutes) (relative units)_______________________________________________________________________DXA1 Spine, hip, 5-10 1-5 Strong, when done
whole body at site of interest
Peripheral Radius, 5-15 1 Less predictive thanDXA, SXA2 calcaneus DXA at hip or spine
for corresponding fractures
QCT3 Spine 10-30 50 Alternative to DXA at spine, but not well studied
Radiographic Hands 5-10 5 Similar to peripheralabsorptiometry4 DXA, SXA
Ultrasound Calcaneus, 5-10 0 Predicts hip and tibia nonvertebral fractures
almost as well as DXA at hip
_______________________________________________________________________1Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, 2Single-energy x-ray absorptiometry, 3Quantitativecomputed tomography; 4Compares the density of proximal phalanges to that of a wedge ofaluminum (with known densities) placed alongside the hand.
Techniques Used to Measure Bone Density
Cummings SR, Bates D and Black DM, JAMA 288:1889 (2002)
Differences in T scores between different skeletal measurement technologies
Faulkner KG et al, J Clin Densit 2: 343-50 (1999).
Benito, M et al. JBMR 20: 1785-91 (2005)
The virtual bone biopsy: Micro MRI and the future of bone imaging
Cross-sectional area through tibia(circle = 6.85 mm diameter)
Same trabecular bone volume before (left) and after (right) treatment of a hypogonadal man with testosterone. Right panel shows a 33% increase in surface-to-curve ratio and 22% decrease in erosion index.
Indications for Bone Density Screening
Age > 65 years Patients with history of fractures Estrogen-deficient women Hypogonadal men Persons taking long-term corticosteriods Persons with endocrinopathy (hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, Cushing's
disease/syndrome) Patients with significant risk factors, regardless of age Assessment of treatment efficacy Postmenopausal women considering therapy for osteoporosis when BMD will facilitate
treatment decisions
Nelson HD, et al., Ann. Intern. Med. 137:529 ( 2002)
DXA Report
Value T- Score Z-Score > 1 to 0 Normal Normal -1 to -2.5 Osteopenia < -2.5 Osteoporosis
Low Peak Bone Mass and/or Secondary Osteoporosis
Intervention thresholds in postmenopausal women based on WHO criteria
Risk of Osteoporotic Fracture
Generally, a drop of 1 SD doubles the risk of fracture.
Cummings SR, Bates D, and Black DM, JAMA 288:1889 (2002)
Osteoporosis in Men
Less common in men larger skeletons bone loss starts later in life slower progression no rapid bone loss phase
Fewer fractures 1/5 to 1/3 of all hip fractures 1/2 as many symptomatic
vertebral fractures but, much higher mortality
rates and chronic disability after a hip fracture
More secondary causes declines in testosterone
levels or hypogonadism history of steroid therapy alcohol abuse significant smoking history hyperparathyoidism intestinal disorders malignancies immobilization
Pignolo, RJ et al., Osteoporosis in Geriatric Secrets, Ch. 44 (2004)
Age-related osteoporosis and fragility fractures
Impact Mechanisms of Bone Loss Diagnosis Current TreatmentCurrent Treatment
Current Therapies
Bone Loss
Remodeling Imbalance
Uncoupling of BoneFormation & Resorption
Random Remodeling Errors
↑PTH
↓ IntestinalCa resorption
↓ Vitamin D
↓ Renal Ca Resorption
↓ Estrogen
↑↓Local GFs & cytokines
ImpairedOsteoblast Function
OsteoblastSenescence
↓ GH
↓ Physical Activity
↑Relative Osteoclast Activity
↑Activation Frequency
EstrogenSERMs
Vit D
Ca
X
X
X
Bisphos-phonates
Rodan, GA and Martin, TJ, Science 289: 1508-1514 (2000)
*****************
*****************
*****
*****
*****
Teriparatide*****************
Antifracture efficacy of the most frequently used treatments of postmenopausal osteoporosis from randomized, placebo-controlled trials* ________________________________________________________________________ Drug Vertebral fractures Non-vertebral fractures Alendronate +++ ++ Calcitonin + 0 Etidronate + 0 HRT + 0 Parathyroid Hormone +++ ++ Raloxifene +++ 0 Risedronate +++ ++ Vitamin D Derivatives +/- 0 ________________________________________________________________________ *In addition to the effects of calcium, vitamin D, or both. +++, strong evidence; ++, good evidence; +, some evidence; +/-, equivocal evidence; -, negative effects
Delmas, PD, Lancet 359:2018-26 (2002)
Skeletal Health Maintenance Adequate nutrition and
body weight Balanced, adequate calorie
diet containing age-appropriate calcium and vitamin D
Avoid diet high in protein, caffeine, phosphorus, or sodium
Regular physical activity, especially resistance and high-impact exercise
Undisrupted sex hormones at puberty Evaluation of absent/
infrequent menstrual cycles in younger women, menopause, pathologically delayed puberty in young men, & male hypogonadism
Avoidance of cigarette smoking
Pignolo, RJ et al., Osteoporosis in Geriatric Secrets, Ch. 44 (2004)
AAOS Recommendations on Enhancing the Care of Patients with Fragility Fractures
Consider osteoporosis as a predisposing factor Advise patients that evaluation and treatment of
osteoporosis can reduce the risk of future fractures Initiate an investigation of osteoporosis Establish partnerships within the medical community to
facilitate evaluation and treatment Establish clinical pathways that ensure optimal care
FRAGILITY FRACTURE PATHWAYALL PATIENTSObtain the following tests: □ 25(OH) Vitamin D level□ Total or ionized calcium□ PhosphateOUTPATIENT□ Rx for calcium 1,200 mg daily□ Rx for Vitamin D 800 IU daily□ Rx for PT fall prevention□ Referral to Robert Pignolo, MD, PhDOsteoporosis Clinic (215) 662-2746INPATIENT□ Consult Geriatrics (Presby) or Endocrine (HUP)□ Administer OsCal 1 tab PO BID (Ca 500mg + Vit D 200 IU)Please do not write Rx or give meds if labs have not been drawn
A clinical pathway for the optimal care of the fragility fracture patient: Our first attempt
Barriers to initiating treatment of patients who have or are at risk for osteoporosis Lack of patient and primary physician knowledge Lack of awareness and use of current osteoporosis guidelines Perception by orthopaedic surgeons that evaluation and
treatment of osteoporosis is not their responsibility Cost of therapy Time and cost of diagnosing osteoporosis Side effects of medications Confusion about medications or their effectiveness Complex medical conditions in elderly patients Reluctance of elderly patients to add more medications Lack of access to BMD testing Lack of time to address secondary prevention
Bogoch, ER et al JBJS 88:25-34 (2006)
In-hospital medical management of the fragility fracture patient Pre-operative evaluation and timing of surgical
intervention Antibiotic prophylaxis Thromboembolic prophylaxis Prevention of delirium Evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis Pain control- No NSAIDS Nutritional evaluation Prevention of pressure ulcers Physical rehabilitation Assessment of fall risk
Summary
>80% of fractures in older patients are due to osteoporosis.
Mechanisms of bone loss are multifactorial and on the cellular and molecular levels always involve an uncoupling of bone formation to resorption.
Radiological evaluation of bone loss is not optimal.
Treatment should be multi-pronged and individualized.
New mechanistic-based therapies are on the horizon.
Fracture should not be the sentinel event that triggers evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis, but if it is, the opportunity should not be missed.
Clinical pathways to ensure optimal care of patients with fragility fractures should be initiated.
Acknowledgements
Research support Richard Lackman Lou Soslowsky Fred Kaplan Eileen Shore
FOP/POH Fred Kaplan Eileen Shore David Glaser
NHHO Mary Ann Keenan Nader Hebela
Osteoblast differentiation & aging Craig Israelite
“Fractures in the Elderly” Mary Ann Keenan Orthopaedic Surgery faculty &
residents Fragility fracture clinical
pathway Nader Hebela Mary Ann Keenan
John Esterhai Ernest Gentchos David Glaser Fred Kaplan
Thank you.
New Generation SERMs
Rodan, GA and Martin, TJ, Science 289: 1508-1514 (2000)
Bisphosphonates in Clinical Use and Development
O=P C P=O
O (CH2)3O
NH2
O OH O
Rodan, GA and Martin, TJ, Science 289: 1508-1514 (2000)
Bisphosphonates, the Mevalonate Pathway, and Other Mechanisms of Action
Cummings, SR and Bauer, JAMA 283: 3255-57 (2000)Zaidi, M et al., J. Bone Min. Res. 18: 599-609 (2003)
Apoptosis
Nitrogen-Containing Bisphosphonates
Osteoclast Osteoblast
Cytoskeletal OrganizationVesicle TransportMembrane RufflingCell Survival
Mobilization ofmineral phase
MMPs, Secreted acidphosphatase, ?Other proteases
Inhibition of apoptosis
Release of osteoclast inhibitory factory ?
Bisphosphonates in Clinical Use and Development
O=P C P=O
O O
O O
R1
R2
Modification Examples R1 R2 Relative
Potency
1st Gen Etidronate OH CH3 1
Clodronate Cl Cl 10
2nd Gen Tiludronate H SC6H3Cl 10
Pamidronate OH (CH2)2NH2 102
Alendronate OH (CH2)3NH2 102-103
3rd Gen Risedronate OH CH2-3-pyridinyl
103-104
Ibandronate OH (CH2)2N
(CH3)2
103-104
Zolendronate OH CH2C3N2H3 104+
Watts, NB, in Primer on the Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism, Ch 55, 2003
Potential complications of bisphosphonate use Short-term
GI intolerance (heartburn, esophageal irritation, esophagitis, abdominal pain, diarrhea)
Severe bone, joint, and/or muscle pain
Ocular inflammation (abnormal or blurred vision, ocular pain, conjunctivitis, uveitis, scleritis)
Acute-phase reaction (fever, myalgias, flu-like syndrome)
Long-term Osteonecrosis of the jaw Suppression of bone formation
Wysowski, DK & Chang, JT Arch Intern Med 165:346 (2005); Fraunfelder, FW & Fraunfelder, FT NEJM 348: 1187 (2003);Odivina, CV et al. J Clin Ednocrinol Metab 90: 1294 (2005).
Osteonecrosis of the jaw
Mechanism is probably sever suppression of bone turnover 94% are treated with zoledronic acid or pamidrate, or both 85% have multiple myeloma or metastatic breast cancer 4% have osteoporosis Prevalence in patients with cancer is 6-10% Estimated incidence in patients taking oral bisphosphonate is
1 in 100,000 patient years 60% occur after dentoalveolar surgery (e.g., tooth extraction)
to treat infections; 40% related to infection, denture trauma, or other physical trauma
Bilezikian, JP, NEJM 355:2278-81 (2006); Treister, N, & Woo, S-B, NEJM 355: 2348 (2006); Woo, S-B et al. Ann Int Med 144: 753-61 (2006)
Osteoclastogenesis
Teitelbaum, SL, Science 289: 1504-1508 (2000)
Osteoclastogenesis and Bone Resorption
Teitelbaum, SL, Science 289: 1504-1508 (2000)
Potential Therapeutic Osteoclast Targets
10 Inhibition of MMP-9
9 Inhibition of p60c-SRC
kinase
1-4 Blocking signaling of OPG/RANKL/RANK
5 Blocking ligands of αvβ3 integrin6 Inhibition of cathepsin K protease
7 Inhibition of vacuolar H+ -ATPase8 Inhibition of p38 kinase
11 Better calcitonin receptor ligands 12 Inhibition of CA2
Rodan, GA and Martin, TJ, Science 289: 1508-1514 (2000)
Denosumab functions like Osteoprotegerin (OPG)
Denosumab Increases BMD in the Spine and Hip
Biological Basis of PTH Action
GsGDP
AGONIST
GTP Gs
ATP
cAMP
PKA(active)
AdenylyCyclase
PTH PTH
PTH1 Receptor
Other signaling:PKC pathways
Anabolic Effects of hPTH(1-34) on Bone
hPTH (1-34)
Continuous... Discontinuous…
Hyperparathyroid-like State
Increased Bone Resorption
Recruitment of quiescentbone lining cells
Prevention of apoptosis
New bone formation
Reeve, J, in Primer on the Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism, Ch 57, 2003
Other Anabolic Bone Therapies
rhPTH(1-84), rhPTH(1-36) Statins Fluoride Bone growth factors: IGF-I,
TGF-β, FGFs, BMPs
Rodan, GA and Martin, TJ, Science 289: 1508-1514 (2000)
Telomerase expression and Osteogenic Potential
Shi, S et al., Nature Biotech. 20: 587-91 (2002)Simonsen, JL et al., Nature Biotech. 20: 592-96 (2002)
In vivo Bone Formation by hMSC-TERTs
Simonsen, JL et al., Nature Biotech. 20: 592-96 (2002)
BMD Scores in a Family with High Bone Mass
Little, RD et al., Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70: 11-19 (2002)
BMD Scores in a Family with High Bone Mass
Little, RD et al., Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70: 11-19 (2002)
High Bone Density Due to a Mutation in LDL-Receptor-Related Protein 5
Boyden, LM et al., NEJM 346: 1513-21 (2002)
HBM mutation and domain structure of the LRP5 protein
Little, RD et al., Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70: 11-19 (2002)
Mutations in LRP5 Cause New Bone Formation
Patel, MS and Karsenty, G, NEJM 346:1572-73 (2002)
Wild-type LRP5
New Bone Formation No New Bone Formation
Mutant LRP5
New Bone Formation