afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court...

12

Transcript of afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court...

Page 1: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 2: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 3: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 4: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 5: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 6: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 7: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 8: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 9: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 10: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 11: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 12: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/ray-s31431.u.pdfUNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL ... namely by wrongfully possessing and wrongfully using methylone,2

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/ray-s31431.u.pdfUNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL ... namely by wrongfully possessing and wrongfully using methylone,2

Air Force Court of Criminal Appealsof tampering."' United States v. Harris, 55 M.J. 433, 440 (C.A.A.F. 2001) (quoting United States v. Maxwell, 38 M.J. 148, 150 (C.M.A. 1993)). In

Air Force Court of Criminal Appealsof tampering."' United States v. Harris, 55 M.J. 433, 440 (C.A.A.F. 2001) (quoting United States v. Maxwell, 38 M.J. 148, 150 (C.M.A. 1993)). In

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/robinette-s31528.u.pdf · ACC: Under these dates ... Despite expressing under oath at trial his complete satisfaction ...

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/robinette-s31528.u.pdf · ACC: Under these dates ... Despite expressing under oath at trial his complete satisfaction ...

IN THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF …afcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/witt-36785.pub.pdf · COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES Appellee, v ... followed up with

IN THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF …afcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/witt-36785.pub.pdf · COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES Appellee, v ... followed up with

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/ellano-s31102...UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES Airman Basic SARAH R. ELLANO United States

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/ellano-s31102...UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES Airman Basic SARAH R. ELLANO United States

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/mccowen-37189.u.pdfSenior Airman JOSHUA E. MCCOWEN United States Air Force ACM 37189 09 April 2009 ... (TB); (3) assaulted

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/mccowen-37189.u.pdfSenior Airman JOSHUA E. MCCOWEN United States Air Force ACM 37189 09 April 2009 ... (TB); (3) assaulted

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/.../afcca_opinions/cp/ranney-s31046.u.pdfforfeiture of $409.00 pay per month for 3 months, reduction to E-3, and a reprimand. Appellate Counsel for

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/.../afcca_opinions/cp/ranney-s31046.u.pdfforfeiture of $409.00 pay per month for 3 months, reduction to E-3, and a reprimand. Appellate Counsel for

United States v. Sanders, 66 M.J. 529 (A.F. Ct. …afcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/sanders-36707.pub.pdf · interview regarding the probability of child pornography being

United States v. Sanders, 66 M.J. 529 (A.F. Ct. …afcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/sanders-36707.pub.pdf · interview regarding the probability of child pornography being

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/valois-36841.u.pdf · Appellate Counsel for the United States: G. Matt Osborn (argued), Colonel Gerald R. Bruce, and Major

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/valois-36841.u.pdf · Appellate Counsel for the United States: G. Matt Osborn (argued), Colonel Gerald R. Bruce, and Major

Reply Brief (c.a.a.f. Jul. 13, 2012) (Final)

Reply Brief (c.a.a.f. Jul. 13, 2012) (Final)

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL …afcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/miller-37869.u.pdf · United States Air Force ... attempted unpremeditated murder. For the

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL …afcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/miller-37869.u.pdf · United States Air Force ... attempted unpremeditated murder. For the

U.S. Air Force, Appellant...de novo. United States v. Ali, 71 M.J. 256, 261 (C.A.A.F. 2012). As a preliminary matter, this Court has statutory jurisdiction to review the decision of

U.S. Air Force, Appellant...de novo. United States v. Ali, 71 M.J. 256, 261 (C.A.A.F. 2012). As a preliminary matter, this Court has statutory jurisdiction to review the decision of