AES Ducts Engineering Basis

download AES Ducts Engineering Basis

of 68

Transcript of AES Ducts Engineering Basis

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    1/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 1

    ______________________________________________________________________________

    Engineering Design Basis

    Ductwork Design Program

    Copyright 1998 Skidmore, Owings & Merrill. All rights reserved.

    ______________________________________________________________________________

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    2/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 2

    Air Flow and Pressure Analysis

    Preliminary Analysis

    Information that is required to analyze a duct system for flow, pressures and sizes include:

    Supply or extract air quantities for each terminal device (diffuser, register, grille) in the room. The location of the terminal device in the room and the routing of ductwork from fan to

    terminal

    Design criteria limits for the project. These include:Sizing method and associated velocity limits

    Ductwork dimensional criteria

    Static and total pressure limits to be used in

    Fan SelectionDuctwork design and sizing

    Air quantities for terminal devices located in each room can be calculated by the HVAC

    Application Loads Program. Locating terminal devices, assigning air quantities to them and

    during graphic input routing ductwork from the fans to the terminal devices.

    Sizing Principles

    Duct design is essentially a solution of two basic equations, the relationship between duct

    velocity, air quantity and duct cross-sectional area, Eq. 1, and Bernoulli's energy balance

    equation, Eq. 2.

    where: 1,2 = subscripts for stations 1 and 2 in the system

    A = cross-sectional area of duct (sq in.)

    V = fluid average velocity (ft/min)

    Q = airflow rate (cu ft/min)

    gc = dimensional constant (lbm - ft)/(lbf - s2)

    P = static pressure (lbf/sq ft)

    = fluid density (lbm/sq ft)

    fc

    AV=Q

    P+Z+P+P+g2V

    =Z+P+P+g2

    Vt222Z

    c

    22

    111z

    c

    21

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    3/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 3

    = g__gc

    = specific weight (lbf/cu ft)

    g = acceleration due to gravity (ft/sec2)

    Z = elevation (ft)P1, P2 = gage pressures at stations 1 and 2 (lb/sq ft)

    PZ1, PZ2 = atmospheric pressures at elevations Z1and Z2 Pt = total pressure loss between station 1 and station 2 in the system (lbf/sq

    ft)

    cf = conversion factor (144)

    When the specific weight of atmospheric air ais constant, it can be written that:

    Assuming that the specific weight of atmospheric air equals that of air within the duct, and

    combining Eq. 2 and 3 yields:

    Head and Pressure

    Head and pressure are often used interchangeably, but these terms have specific meanings.

    Head is the height of a fluid column supported by fluid flow, while pressure is the normal force

    per unit area. With a liquid, it is convenient to measure the head of a fluid in terms of the

    flowing fluid. With a gas or air, however, it is customary to measure pressure on a column of

    liquid.

    Static Pressure

    Air exerts pressure on the walls of the duct in which it is confined. This pressure Psis called staticpressure at a station in the system and is positive or negative according to whether the pressure

    is greater or less than the ambient atmospheric pressure.

    Velocity Pressure

    The term ( V2/2gc) in Eq. 2 is called the velocity pressure. Acting in the same direction as the

    flow of air, it is a measure of the kinetic energy. The velocity head (V2/2g) is independent of fluid

    density, while velocity pressure is not independent of density.

    Z-Z=P-P 12a2Z1Z

    P+P+g2

    V=P+

    g2

    Vt2

    c

    22

    1

    c

    21

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    4/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 4

    where: Pv = velocity pressure (in. of water)

    V = fluid mean velocity (ft/min)

    = fluid density (lbm/cu ft)

    cf = conversion factor (1097)

    Total Pressure

    Total pressure is the sum of static pressure and velocity pressure:

    where: Pt = total pressure (in. of water)

    Ps = static pressure (in. of water)

    Pv = velocity pressure (in. of water)

    The pressure loss Ptin Eq. 2 is the resistance of a section of a duct system to flow and is

    composed of two elements:

    Duct friction, which as the name implies, is the frictional drag of the fluid moving along arough surface, the duct wall.

    Dynamic loss, caused by restrictions and changes in direction to the flow through a piece ofequipment (volume damper, heating coil, sound attenuator, etc.) and duct fittings.

    Frictional Losses

    When air flows through a duct, there is a loss of pressure due to the frictional drag of the air

    moving along the surfaces of the ducts.

    For air flow in ducts, the friction loss may be calculated by the Darcy-Weisbach equation:

    where: = fluid density (lbm/cu ft)

    V = fluid mean velocity (ft/min)

    fc

    V=P

    2

    v

    fc

    V+P=P

    2

    st

    P+P=P vst

    fc

    Vx

    D

    Lxfcf=P

    2

    2

    1drf

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    5/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 5

    Pfr = friction losses in terms of total pressure (in. of water)

    fd = friction factor, dimensionless

    L = duct length (ft)

    D = equivalent internal diameter of duct (in.)cf1 = conversion factor (12)

    cf2 = conversion factor (1097)

    Air flow in ducts follow two very different regimes: laminar flow at low velocities, and turbulent

    at high velocities. A transition zone in which flow may be either laminar or turbulent exists

    between the laminar and fully developed turbulent regions. Experimentation has determined

    two Reynolds numbers for which the flow is entirely laminar or turbulent. This dimensionless

    quantity, known as the Reynolds number Re, is defined by:

    where: D = equivalent internal diameter of duct (in.)

    V = fluid velocity in an equivalent round duct (ft/min)

    = fluid density (lbm/cu ft)

    = fluid dynamic viscosity (lbm/ft x hr)

    cf = conversion factor (5)

    Within the region of laminar flow (Reynolds numbers less than 2100). The friction factor fdis afunction of the Reynolds number only, and it is ndependent of the roughness coefficient of the

    duct wall. It is defined by:

    In completely turbulent regions (Reynolds numbers greater than 4000), the friction fddepends on

    the relative roughness of the duct material. It is independent of the Reynolds number and

    defined by:

    In the transition zone (Reynolds numbers between 2100 and 4000), the fraction fddepends on

    duct material absolute roughness and the Reynolds number represented by the Colebrook

    equation:

    DVxfc-Re

    R

    46=f

    e

    d

    fc

    D2+1.14=

    f

    1

    d

    log

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    6/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 6

    where: = duct material absolute roughness (ft)

    cf = conversion factor, (12)

    If the air flow is smooth (Re < 2100), then Eq. 10 is used to determine the friction factor fdto

    solve the Darcy-Weisbach equation, Eq. 8, for friction drop through the duct section. To

    differentiate between transitional and rough turbulent flows, a value for fdis calculated from the

    equation for rough turbulent flows. Eq. 11. This is then used in Eq. 13 which is a close

    approximation of the curve which separates the rough flow from transitional on the Moody chart

    (ASHRAE Handbook: 1981 Fundamentals p. 4.10, fig. 13).

    where: cf = conversion factor (2.16 x 10-6

    )

    If T is greater than 100, the flow is rough and the value calculated for fdin Eq. 11 is

    representative of the flow. If T is less than 100, the flow is transitional and the value for fdobtained from Eq. 11 is used as a starting value to solve Eq. 12 iteratively for the friction factor

    for the flow. fdis then used in Eq. 8 to obtain the friction loss through the duct section.

    Absolute Roughness

    Duct material absolute roughness used by the program is shown in Fig. 1-6:

    Duct Material Absolute Roughness, / ft

    Uncoated Carbon Steel, Clean 0.00015

    Aluminum 0.0002

    Galvanized Steel, Hot Dipped 0.0005

    Stainless Steel 0.0003

    Fibrous Glass Duct, Rigid 0.0003

    Flexible Duct, Metallic 0.007

    Fibrous Glass Duct Liner 0.015

    Fig. 1-6: Duct Material Absolute Roughness

    (reproduced with permission fromASHRAE Handbook: 1981

    Fundamentals p. 33.5)

    fD/fceR

    9.3+12-

    fc

    D2+1.14=

    f

    1

    dd

    loglog

    fcxxx8/fV=T

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    7/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 7

    Frictional Losses for Noncircular Ducts

    All friction loss calculations are based on the equivalent hydraulic diameter.

    With equal length of round and rectangular ducts, constant flow in each duct, and equal

    resistance to flow in both the round and rectangular ducts, the equivalent round of a rectangular

    duct is:

    where: De = circular equivalent of a rectangular duct of equal length, fluid resistance and flow

    a = length of one side of duct (in.)

    b = length of adjacent side of duct (in.)

    The mean velocity in a rectangular and oval duct will be less than its circular equivalent.

    For oval ducts, the corresponding equations are:

    where: p = perimeter of oval duct (in.)

    a = length of major axis (in.)b = length of minor axis (in.)

    For both rectangular and oval ducts, the length of the sides is initially determined by the target

    aspect ratio. If the resulting dimensions fall outside the minimum and maximum allowable limits

    you have set, the dimensions are recalculated without using the target aspect ratio.

    )b+(a

    )b(a1.30=D 0.250

    0.625

    e

    b)-(ab+4

    b=A

    2

    b)-(a2+b=P

    pA

    1.55=D 0.25

    0.625

    e

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    8/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 8

    Dynamic Losses

    Dynamic losses are caused by restrictions and changes in direction to the flow through a piece of

    equipment (volume damper, heating coil, etc.) and duct fittings. HVAC Systems Duct Design,

    SMACNA, 1985 lists the fittings available for round and rectangular ducts. Since little dynamic

    loss data for oval fittings are available, the data for rectangular fittings are used as an

    approximation.

    Fittings

    A duct fitting can occur anywhere along the length of a duct section. The program does not limit

    the number of fitting types or multiples thereof per duct section. If a fitting type is not available

    in the tables, its dynamic loss has to be entered as a special loss.

    All the necessary engineering performance information for fittings is provided in the Ducts

    Program. The engineering design effort is to locate the appropriate fitting type in the duct

    network system. The duct fitting type and shape type should be compatible. Fittings are

    classified as junctions, transitions, and elbows.

    Junctions Junctions are fittings which split the air stream into two or more branches.

    Converging junctions join two or more air streams into one and are basically

    used in a return/extract duct system. Fittings called take-offs, tees, and wyes

    are in this category. Loss coefficients for junctions are functions of the duct

    dimensions, air velocities and airflow rates.

    Transitions Transitions are fittings which change the duct size or shape without changing

    airflow direction or airflow rate. Transitions can be converging or diverging.

    Loss coefficients for transitions are functions of upstream and downstream

    duct velocities, angle of transition, transition length, and Reynolds number, Re.

    Elbows Elbows are fittings which change the direction of the air stream without

    changing the air quantity or velocity. The loss coefficients of elbows are

    functions of the elbow radius, duct dimensions, angle of turn, and Reynolds

    number, Re.

    By definition, a new duct section occurs when there is a change in air quantity, velocity, shape,

    duct material or duct insulation. Every duct section, therefore, begins with a junction or

    transition type fitting. These fittings are commonly referred to as take-off fittings. There is

    always one, and only one, take-off fitting per duct section.

    Fitting Losses

    Methods of computing the energy losses from the various fitting types are based on information

    found inASHRAE Handbook: 1981 Fundamentalsp. 33.28 through 33.50

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    9/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 9

    The fluid resistance coefficient represents the ratio of the total pressure loss to the dynamic

    pressure at the referenced cross-section O:

    where: cf = conversion factor (1097)

    Pt = total losses of fitting in terms of total pressure (in. of water)

    Co = overall fluid resistance coefficient referenced to section O, dimensionless

    V = average velocity to which coefficient Cois referenced (ft/min)

    Pv,o = velocity pressure (in. of water) = fluid density (lbm/cu ft)

    For entries, exists, elbows and transitions, the fitting total pressure loss at section is calculated

    by:

    where the subscript o is the cross section at which the velocity pressure is referenced.

    For converging and diverging flow junctions, the total pressure loss through the main section is

    calculated as:

    For total pressure losses through the branch section

    where: Cc,s = main local coefficient, dimensionless

    Cc,b = branch local coefficient, dimensionless

    Pv,c = velocity pressure at the common section, c

    P

    P=

    fc

    V

    P=Cov,

    t

    2

    o

    to

    PC=P ov,ot

    PC=P cv,sc,t

    PC=P cv,bc,t

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    10/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 10

    A tee nomenclature is shown inFig. 1-7for converging and diverging flow junction where,

    (reproduced with permission from ASHRAE Handbook:

    1981 Fundamentals, Fig. 6, p. 33.8)

    Fan Pressures, Mechanical Energy

    For a supply duct system, a circuit is defined as the succeeding sections of ductwork from the fan

    discharge up to either a terminal device or a primary damper (for constant-volume, fan-powered

    boxes only). For an extract duct system, a circuit is defined as the succeeding section ofductwork from a terminal device up to a fan.

    The number of circuits in a duct system is, by definition, equal to the number terminal devices

    and/or constant-volume, fan-powered boxes.

    The supply and extract duct systems are run independently; however, the supply system does

    need the total pressure losses from the extract system in order to determine the fan total

    pressure if a return fan is not specified. Therefore, the extract duct system should be run first,

    the total pressure losses of the extract duct system are compared to the loss from the outdoor

    intake to the mixing box. The greater of the two is used as miscellaneous duct losses for the

    supply system.

    The total pressure losses for each section of a duct system are calculated by Eq. 22:

    where: Pt = total pressure loss for section of ductwork (in. of water)

    Pi = fitting total pressure loss (in. of water)

    n = number of fittings within a section of ductwork

    PC=P|PC=pPC

    =P

    |PC

    =P

    cv,bc,b)to(ctcv,bc,c)to(bt

    cv,sc,s)to(ctcv,sc,c)to(st

    P+P+P=P kj

    m

    1=j

    i

    n

    1=i

    t

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    11/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 11

    Pj = equipment (damper, coil, etc.) total pressure loss (in. of water)

    m = number of pieces of equipment within a section of ductwork

    Pk = duct friction loss in terms of total pressure (in. of water)

    The total pressure drop through each circuit is calculated by summing the pressure loss through

    each section in the circuit.

    The fan total pressure requirement for an extract duct system is given by the expressions:

    where: Pt = fan total pressure (in. of water)

    ? = pressure drop through critical circuit, circuit with maximum resistance to flow

    (H2O)

    SEFI = system effect factor due to fan inlet conditions (in. of water)

    SEFo = system effect factor due to fan outlet conditions (in. of water)

    Pf = total pressure loss through fan components such as coils, filters, etc. (H2O)

    Pd = total pressure loss through miscellaneous ductwork such as ductwork

    downstream of the fan for an extract system, or extract or return ductwork for

    a supply system (H2O)

    Duct Sizing

    The sections of supply duct systems can be sized using one of the following methods:

    Pre-sized equal friction

    static regain total pressure velocity reduction constant velocity

    Equal friction and constant velocity are the only methods for the design of extract duct systems.

    For a draw-through fan, the first section is the one immediately downstream of the fan outlet. If

    the supply fan arrangement is blow-through, the first section of the ductwork is the section

    immediately downstream of the cooling coil. If the fan has a discharge plenum, the first section

    of the ductwork is the one immediately following the plenum. You should identify the first

    section and lay out the duct network accordingly.

    The static regain, total pressure and velocity reduction sizing methods cannot be used to size

    duct sections downstream of terminal boxes. If you select one of these three methods

    P+P+SEF+SEF+P=P dfoitt

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    12/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 12

    downstream of a terminal box, the program will automatically default to the equal friction

    method.

    Flexible ducts are always considered round in shape. They are sized using the velocity youspecify.

    Pre-Sized Method

    The pre-sized method can be used to calculate pressure losses for a system with pre-calculated

    duct dimensions. If you choose this method, the program will check the network for duct

    dimensions. Only if all sections are sized will it calculate pressure drops through each section

    and determine critical circuits.

    Equal Friction Sizing Method

    In the equal friction method, the system is sized for a constant pressure loss per unit length of

    duct. The equal friction method can be used for the design of supply and extract duct systems.

    The program offers two options for this method. The first option, called ASHRAE Limits, allows

    the designer to specify high and low limits for pressure loss per unit length and velocity.

    For the other option, you can specify the pressure loss per unit length and the maximum and

    minimum velocity for the sections of a duct system.

    The equal friction sizing method works iteratively between the minimum and maximum velocity

    limits to determine a duct size that results in the specified pressure loss per unit length. You can

    also request a pressure analysis of the network.

    Static Regain Sizing Method

    For this method, a section of the duct system is sized so that the increase in static pressure due

    to velocity reduction from its upstream section, offsets the friction loss in the section. As in the

    other sizing methods, the program starts sizing with the first section. If you have not specified

    any overrides for the ducts in that section, it is sized based on the maximum velocity you

    specified.

    When sizing any other section, the program searches upstream of that section until it finds a

    section that also used the static regain sizing method. The velocity at the exit of that section is

    used as the upper velocity limit for the section to be sized; the minimum you specified is used as

    the lower limit. The program searches iteratively between these limits to calculate a duct size

    that results in the required static regain. If the static regain calculated is less than that required

    even at minimum velocity, the section is sized using minimum velocity.

    If the program encounters a section where all upstream sections are pre-sized, that section is

    sized using maximum velocity and the sizing method is applicable starting at that section.

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    13/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 13

    Essentially, the program disregards any sections that have been overridden or that use another

    sizing method.

    The advantage of this method is that all sections have approximately the same entering staticpressure, thereby simplifying outlet selection. One disadvantage might be seen in networks with

    a large pressure drop in a section near the fan outlet. The velocity could be reduced to the

    minimum within a few sections in such a way that all the ductwork downstream would be sized

    using minimum velocity. Another disadvantage could stem from specifying a very low minimum

    velocity. Ducts would then tend to be very large at the end of long branch runs. The sizing

    method does not account for the total mechanical energy supplied to the air by the fan.

    Total Pressure Sizing Method

    The total pressure sizing method is a variation of the static regain method. The total pressure ofany point in the ductwork represents the actual energy of the moving air at that point.

    The program will search for the first section that does not have override dimensions. This

    section is sized at the maximum velocity you have specified. When sizing any other section, the

    program searches upstream until it finds a section that also used the total pressure sizing

    method. The total pressure leaving that section is considered equal to the total pressure

    entering the section to be sized. The program then uses binary convergence, starting with the

    minimum velocity, until it finds a duct size that matches the required entering total pressure. All

    presized duct sections are disregarded when applying the total pressure sizing method to the

    sections to be sized.

    The advantage of this method is that it accounts for all mechanical energy losses in a system.

    The system design does not have to be dependent on an assumed velocity at the fan outlet.

    Velocity Reduction Sizing Method

    This method sizes the first section for the maximum velocity that you specified and designs the

    downstream sections at progressively lower velocities using the reduction percentage you also

    specified. The velocity cannot fall below the minimum that you specified.

    If the section immediately above the section to be sized is a presized section, the program

    searches upstream until it finds a section that also used the velocity reduction sizing method and

    treats it as the upstream section for the section to be sized.

    Constant Velocity Sizing Method

    The constant velocity method is a design in which every section of a duct system is sized based

    on the design velocity you specified. This design velocity may be overridden for any section of

    the system. Maximum and minimum velocity limits are not applicable in this method. Flexible

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    14/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 14

    ducts are also sized based on a design velocity you specified. The constant velocity method can

    be used for the design of supply and extract duct systems.

    Circuit Analysis and System Balancing

    The series of duct sections starting from the primary fan/air handling unit section to the duct

    section with an opening is defined as a circuit. The number of duct circuits in a duct system is, by

    definition, equal to the number of supply and exhaust openings (registers, grilles or diffusers).

    Circuit pressure analysis consists of the following steps:

    Add the pressure losses in each section of the circuit to obtain the circuit pressure loss. Determine the highest circuit pressure loss.

    Set the entering total pressure of the first section in the circuit as the sum of the highestcircuit pressure loss and the velocity pressure in the section.

    Analyze each section in the circuit starting with the first section and moving through eachsection in the fluid flow sequence.

    The entering section total pressure is the leaving section total pressure of the upstream

    section.

    The leaving section total pressure is the entering section total pressure less the section

    pressure loss.

    The entering and leaving section static pressures are obtained by deducting the velocity

    pressure at these nodes.

    Calculate the balancing required in each circuit. This is equal to the highest circuit totalpressure loss minus the given circuit total pressure loss.

    In the case of primary-secondary systems, the primary circuit ends at the fan-powered box or the

    terminal device if there is no box in the circuit.

    Secondary systems are analyzed independently as separate systems. The entering pressure of

    the first section in the secondary system is the pressure loss of the secondary circuit with the

    highest pressure loss.

    The objective of system balancing is to maintain the same pressure loss in all circuits. Dampers

    at the end of each circuit will still be required, but are used to make the fine tuning adjustmentto maintain the right air quantity at each opening.

    Using the specified sizing method, the Ducts Program makes the preliminary analysis and

    calculates sizes for all sections of the duct system. It next determines the circuit with the highest

    pressure loss. This circuit is commonly referred as the longest hydraulic run. All other circuits

    will have to be dampered. The amount of dampering is directly related to the difference

    between the pressure loss of the given circuit and the highest pressure loss of the system.

    The system balancing process involves a series of iterations to increase the pressure losses of all

    circuits to that of the circuit with the highest pressure loss. The process starts with the circuit

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    15/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 15

    with the next highest pressure loss and continues in descending order of circuit pressure loss.

    Duct sections in the circuit and that are not common to the previously analyzed circuits are

    iteratively reduced in size until the circuit pressure loss is equal to the loss in the longest run.

    There are limits to the process of reducing sizes. The iteration stops when the pressure loss,velocity and noise levels in the duct section reaches the maximum limits of the design criteria. In

    this case, the circuit still remains unbalanced and requires dampering. Output reports indicate

    the amount of dampering required by each circuit.

    Thermal Analysis

    After the duct network has been sized, the system can be analyzed to calculate heat gains or

    losses in the network.

    The thermal analysis option is available only for systems that satisfy the following criteria: There are no terminal boxes in the network with reheat coils. All rooms are in either the heating or cooling mode. There are no secondary heating coils in the system.

    The program begins the thermal analysis with the first section in the ductwork. The temperature

    of air entering the first section is the same as the coil leaving temperature for a blow-through

    system. For a draw-through system, the temperature of air entering the first section is adjusted

    for heat gain across the fan. For a motor that is inside the airstream, the heat gain is given by

    For a motor that is outside the airstream, the heat gain is

    where: qm = heat gain from electric motor (Btu/hr)

    HPm = horsepower rating for the motor = full load motor efficiency (%)

    LF = load factor, i.e. a fraction of rated load delivered

    cf = conversion factor (745.7)

    The horsepower rating and full load efficiency are obtained from Fig. 1-8.

    The temperature rise across the fan is then calculated using the following equation:

    cfxLFx/100HP=q mm

    cfxLFxHP=q mm

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    16/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 16

    where: Tf = temperature rise across the fan (F)

    qm = heat gain from electric motor (Btu/hr)

    Q = air flow quantity (cu ft/min)

    cf1 = conversion factor (14.4)

    = air density (lbm/cu ft)

    Rated

    Motor HP

    Full Load

    Efficiency %

    Rated

    Motor HP

    Full Load

    Efficiency %

    0.16 35 20 87

    0.25 54 25 88

    0.33 56 30 89

    0.50 60 40 89

    0.75 72 50 89

    1 77 60 89

    2 79 75 90

    3 81 100 90

    5 82 125 90

    7.5 84 150 91

    10 85 200 9115 86 250 91

    Fig. 1-8: Heat Gains from Typical Electric Motors

    (reproduced with permission fromASHRAE Handbook: 1981 Fundamentalsp. 26.26, Table 24)

    Once the temperature of air entering the first section is determined, the individual sections can

    be analyzed for heat gains or losses. The program calculates heat gains or losses using the

    following expressions:

    xfcxQ

    q=T

    1

    mf

    t-

    2

    t+t

    cf

    UPL=q a

    ie

    e

    1)-y(

    t2-1)+y(t=t

    aie

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    17/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 17

    where: Y = cf 1AV /UPL for rectangular and oval ducts

    y = cf 2DV /UL for round ducts

    qe = heat loss/gain through duct walls (Btu/hr) (Negative for heat gain)

    U = overall coefficient of heat transfer of duct walls (Btu/sq ft. F)

    P = perimeter of duct (in.)

    A = cross-sectional area of duct (sq in.)

    D = duct diameter (in.)

    L = duct length (ft)

    = density (lbm/cu ft)

    andte = temperature of air entering duct (F)

    ti = temperature of air leaving duct (F)

    ta = temperature of air surrounding duct, (F)

    cf = conversion factor (12)

    cf1 = conversion factor (2.4)

    cf2 = conversion factor (0.6)

    The U-values used in the program for sheet metal, lined and insulated ducts are shown in Fig 1-9.

    (reproduced with permission from ASHRAE Handbook: 1981 Fundamentals, p. 33.10, Fig. 8)

    1)+y(

    t21)-y(t=t

    aei

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    18/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 18

    Reanalysis Options

    The program provides two ways to reanalyze heat gains and losses. You can choose to

    Recalculate air flow quantities at each terminal device Adjust the coil leaving temperature

    Option One

    The first option is to recalculate air flow quantities required at each terminal device in order to

    satisfy the design cooling or heating loads in each room. This is done by comparing the actual

    supply air temperature to the design supply air temperature that you can specify for each room.

    The following expression is used to recalculate the air flow quantities:

    where: Q1 = design supply air quantity (cu ft/min)

    Q2 = recalculated supply air quantity (cu ft/min)

    Tr = design room dry-bulb temperature (F)

    Ts = design supply air temperature at terminal device (F)

    To = actual supply air temperature at terminal device (F)

    Once the supply air quantities are adjusted, the program then resizes the ductwork and has theoption of performing pressure, acoustic and thermal analyses for the new network.

    Option Two

    The second option is to recalculate the coil leaving temperature by an amount equal to the

    temperature difference in the circuit with the maximum temperature rise or drop.

    For a network that has net heat gain across the sections, the coil leaving temperature is lowered

    so that the design supply air temperature can be maintained at the terminal device for the circuit

    with the maximum temperature rise. For a network that has net heat loss across the sections,the coil leaving temperature is increased so that design supply air temperature can be

    maintained at the terminal device for the circuit with the maximum temperature drop.

    The next step is to recalculate supply air quantities for all other terminal devices in order to

    satisfy design cooling or heating loads for each room.

    Once the required air quantities are recalculated, the program then resizes the network and has

    the option of performing pressure, acoustic and thermal analyses for the network.

    T-T

    T-TQ=Qor

    sr

    12

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    19/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 19

    Acoustic Analysis and System Noise Attenuation

    The program determines the amount of required attenuation on the inlet and discharge sides of

    the fan(s), or in the main ductwork and branches as described below.

    For each circuit, the program determines the resultant attenuation provided by the following

    items:

    1. In straight, line and unlined duct

    2. In lined and unlined elbows

    3. Fan discharge plenum (supply ductwork only)

    4. Branch takeoffs

    5. Duct and reflection loss

    6. Room effect

    The resultant sound power level per terminal device (inlet or outlet) is the difference between

    the attenuation of the ductwork system and room effect (items 1 through 6) and the fan-

    generated sound power level for all eight octave bands. The difference between this resultant

    sound power level per diffuser and the sound pressure levels that correspond with the specified

    room criterion (NC level) represents the attenuation required on the inlet and discharge sides of

    the fan(s), or in the main ductwork and branches.

    Fig. 1-10 summarizes the system noise procedure described for each circuit.

    Line Item1 Fan Lwre 10

    -2watts

    2 Attenuation of duct system

    3 Branch take-offs and room effect attenuation

    4 Total system attenuation, line 2 + line 3

    5 Sound Power level per terminal device

    6 Room criterion (NC level), line 1 - line 4

    7 Required attenuation, line 5 - line 6

    Fig. 1-10: Summary Table

    On determining the resultant sound power level for each circuit, the program does not take into

    account the following items:

    attenuation through terminal boxes terminal box discharge sound power level regenerated noise at fitting attenuation in fittings other than elbows and branch takeoffs

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    20/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 20

    Fan Noise

    The sound power generation of a given fan obtained from the fan manufacturer may be entered

    using the fan sound power levels input form. However, if the data are not available, the programcan estimate the octave band sound power levels for various fans using the following expression:

    where: Lw = estimated sound power level of fan (dB re 1pW)

    Kw = specific sound power level from table

    Q = flow rate (cu ft/min)

    Q1 = 1 when flow is in sq ft/min

    P = Fan static pressure (in. of water)

    P1 = 1 when pressure is in in. of water

    C = correction factor in dB, for point of operation

    The values of the estimated sound power level L ware calculated for all eight bands using Eq. 30,

    and the BFI (see Fig. 1-11) is added to the octave band in which the blade passage frequency

    falls. Fig. 1-12 is used to determine the octave band in which blade frequency increment (BFI)

    occurs for the various types of fans.

    Fan TypeFan Octave Band Center Frequency Hz

    63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 BFI

    Centrifugal Airfoil

    backward curved, >= 36 in. 32 32 31 29 28 23 15 10 3

    Backward inclined < 36 in. 36 38 36 34 33 38 20 15

    Forward, curved All 47 43 39 33 28 25 23 20 2

    Radial blade, > 40 in. 45 39 42 39 37 32 30 29

    Pressure blower 40 in.-20 in.

    20 in.

    55

    63

    48

    57

    48

    58

    45

    50

    45

    44

    40

    39

    38

    38

    36

    37 8

    Vaneaxial >= 40 in.

    40 in.

    39

    37

    36

    39

    38

    43

    39

    43

    37

    43

    34

    41

    32

    38

    30

    35 6

    Tubeaxial >= 40 in.

    40 in.

    41

    40

    39

    41

    43

    47

    41

    46

    39

    44

    37

    43

    34

    37

    31

    32 5

    Propeller

    Cooling tower All 48 51 58 55 52 46 40 5

    Fig. 1-11: Sound Power Levels

    Specific sound power levels for inlets or outlets.

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.7, p. 11.14)

    C+P

    P+20+

    Q

    Q10+K=L

    11

    ww loglog

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    21/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 21

    Fan Type Octave Band

    Centrifugal

    Airfoil, backward curved, backward

    inclined

    Forward curved

    Radial blade, pressure blower

    250 Hz

    500 Hz

    125 Hz

    Vaneaxial 125 Hz

    Tubeaxial 63 Hz

    Cooling Tower Propeller 63 Hz

    Fig. 1-12: Octave Band

    Octave band in which blade frequency increment occurs.

    (reproduced with permission from1987 ASHRAE Handbook, Table 4, p. 52.7)

    Point of Operation

    The specific sound power levels given in Fig. 1-11 are for fans operating at or near the peak

    efficiency point of the fan performance curve. If a fan is not operating at or above 90% of peak

    static efficiency, a correction factor, C (see Eq. 30), is added to the specific sound power levelsgiven in Fig. 1-13 for all eight octave bands. Fig. 1-12 gives the correction factor C as a function

    of percent of peak static efficiency.

    Static Efficiency

    % of Peak

    Correction Factor

    dB

    90 to 100 0

    85 to 89 3

    75 to 84 665 to 74 9

    55 to 64 12

    50 to 54 15

    Fig. 1-13: Correction Factor C

    Correction factor, C, for off-peak operation (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Systems

    Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.8, p. 11.15)

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    22/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 22

    Fans In Parallel

    The program can accept up to ten fans in parallel. These fans must be of the same type andproduce the same static pressure and flow rate. The resultant sound power levels of two or

    more fans in parallels for all octave bands are obtained from Fig. 1-14.

    Difference

    between sound

    levels in dB

    No. of dB to be

    added to higher

    level

    0 3.0

    1 2.6

    2 2.1

    3 1.8

    4 1.5

    5 1.2

    6 1.0

    7 0.8

    8 0.6

    10 0.4

    12 0.3

    14 0.2

    Fig. 1-14: Combining Decibels

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.1, p. 11.2)

    Example: Find the resultant sound power levels of three fans in parallel having an estimated

    sound power level equal to 90 dB at the 125 octave band using Fig. 1-14.

    Solution:1. 90 dB - 90 dB = 0 dB from Fig. 1-14, 3 dB is added to the higher level 90 dB. The

    resultant sound power level for 2 fans in parallel is 90 + 3 = 93 dB.

    2. 93 dB - 90 dB = 3 dB from Fig. 1-14, 1.8 dB is added to the higher level 93 dB. The

    resultant sound power level for 3 fans in parallel is 93 + 1.8 = 94.8 dB.

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    23/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 23

    Fan Discharge Air Plenum

    The sound attenuation provided by a plenum on the fan discharge shown in Fig. 1-15 is

    where: = absorption coefficient of lining, dimensionless

    Se = plenum exit area (sq ft)

    Sw = plenum wall area (sq ft)

    dr = distance between entrance and exit (ft)

    = angle of incident at exit, degrees

    Attenuation of the Duct System

    The program calculates the natural attenuation of unlined rectangular and round duct sections of

    the duct system using Fig. 1-16 and Fig. 1-17. These tables give the natural attenuation for linear

    length as a function of the duct dimension for all the eight octave bands.

    Fig. 1-16 is also used for oval ducts. The program uses the smallest duct dimensions for

    rectangular and oval ducts. The attenuation values given in Fig. 1-16 and Fig. 1-17 are doubled if

    the unlined duct section has an external insulation.

    The program calculates the natural attenuation of lined rectangular and round duct sections and

    elbows using Fig. 1-18 through Fig. 1-21. These tables give the attenuation as a function of duct

    dimension and lining thickness for all eight octave bands.

    Fig. 1-18 and Fig. 1-19 are also used for oval ducts. The program uses the smallest duct

    dimension for rectangular and oval ducts. The attenuation values given in Fig. 1-18 through Fig.

    1-21 are used for duct sections of only a maximum of 15 linear feet of lined duct, lined duct

    sections of over 15 linear feet are considered as unlined duct.

    wS

    -1+

    d2S

    110=A

    2e

    coslog

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    24/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 24

    Smallest Duct

    Dimension

    Octave Band Center Frequency Hz

    63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

    Attenuation 3"-12" .10 .10 .05 .05 .04 .04 .04 .04

    Of Unlined 13"-18" .15 .10 .05 .05 .04 0.4 0.4 0.4

    Rectangular 19"-24" .18 .12 .06 .05 .04 0.4 0.4 0.4

    Duct dB/ft 25"-36" .20 .14 .06 .05 .04 0.4 0.4 0.4

    37"-48" .20 .14 .06 .05 .04 .04 .04 .04

    49"-72" .20 .15 .06 .05 .04 .04 .04 .04

    73"-96"+ .20 .16 .07 .05 .04 0.4 0.4 0.4

    Fig. 1-16: Attenuation, Unlined Rectangular and Oval Ducts

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10A, p. 11.16)

    Smallest Duct

    Dimension

    Octave Band Center Frequency Hz

    63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

    Attenuation 3"-5" .03 .03 .02 .02 .01 .01 .01 .01

    Of Unlined 6"-12" .03 .03 .02 .02 .01 .01 .01 .01

    Round 13"-18" .02 .02 .01 .01 0 0 0 0

    Duct dB/ft 19"-24" .02 .02 .01 .01 0 0 0 0

    25"-36" .02 .02 .01 .01 0 0 0 0

    37"-48" .01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    49"-72" .01 .01 0 0 0 0 0 0

    73"-96"+ .01 .01 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Fig. 1-17: Attenuation, Unlined Round Ducts

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10B, p. 11.16)

    Smallest Duct

    Dimension

    Octave Band Center Frequency Hz

    63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

    Attenuation 3"-5" .3 .6 1.0 2.1 5.0 10.5 5.0 4.0

    Of Unlined 6"-12" .2 .4 .9 1.9 4.3 7.5 2.0 2.0

    Rectangular 13"-18" .2 .3 .6 1.5 3.7 3.0 1.0 1.0

    Duct dB/ft with 19"-24" .2 .2 .5 1.4 3.5 1.8 .8 .8

    1 lining 25"-36" .2 .2 .4 1.0 1.8 1.2 .6 .6

    37"-48" .2 .2 .3 .9 1.5 1.0 .4 .4

    49"-72" .2 .2 .25 .8 1.0 .8 .3 .3

    73"-96"+ .2 .2 .25 .7 .8 .7 .2 .2

    Fig. 1-18: Rectangular Duct, 1 Inch Lining

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10E, p. 11.17)

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    25/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 25

    Smallest Duct

    Dimension

    Octave Band Center Frequency Hz

    63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

    Attenuation 3"-5" .2 .4 .7 1.3 2.5 5.0 5.0 4.0

    Of Unlined 6"-12" .2 .3 .6 1.1 2.2 4.5 2.0 2.0

    Rectangular 13"-18" .2 .25 .5 1.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.0

    Duct dB/ft 19"-24" .2 .2 .4 .8 1.6 1.4 .8 .8

    with 1/2 25"-36" .2 .2 .3 .6 1.2 1.0 .6 .6

    lining 37"-48" .2 .2 .2 .4 .8 .8 .3 .3

    49"-72" .2 .2 .2 .3 .5 .5 .3 .3

    73"-96"+ .2 .2 .2 .2 .4 .4 .2 .2

    Fig. 1-19: Rectangular Duct, 1/2 Inch Lining

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10F, p. 11.17)

    Smallest Duct

    Dimension

    Octave Band Center Frequency Hz

    63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

    Attenuation 6"-12" .3 1.0 1.5 1.5 3.7 4.8 2.8 2.2

    Of Unlined 13"-18" .2 .7 1.0 1.2 2.7 2.8 1.5 1.3

    Round 19"-24" .1 .5 .6 1.0 1.7 .9 .5 .5

    Duct dB/ft 25"-36" .07 .2 .4 .8 1.0 .7 .5 .5

    with 1 37"-48" .04 .08 .3 .6 .6 .5 .5 .5

    lining 49"-72" .02 .04 .2 .5 .5 .4 .4 .4

    73"-96"+ .01 .02 .1 .4 .4 .3 .3 .3Fig. 1-20: Round Duct, 1 Inch Lining

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10G, p. 11.17)

    Smallest Duct

    Dimension

    Octave Band Center Frequency Hz

    63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

    Attenuation 6"-12" .5 1.2 1.7 2.3 3.9 5.0 3.0 2.3

    Of Unlined 13"-18" .4 1.0 1.2 2.2 3.0 3.0 1.7 1.5

    Round 19"-24" .3 .8 .9 2.1 2.0 1.0 .8 .7

    Duct dB/ft 25"-36" .2 .3 .7 1.5 1.5 .8 .6 .6

    with 2 37"-48" .12 .2 .5 1.0 1.0 .7 .6 .6

    lining 49"-72" .08 .1 .3 .7 .7 .5 .5 .5

    73"-96"+ .06 .08 .2 .6 .6 .4 .4 .4

    Fig. 1-21: Round Duct, 2 Inch Lining

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10H, p. 11.17)

    The attenuation of unlined rectangular and round elbows is given in Fig. 1-22. The program

    doubles the attenuation values given in this table if the unlined elbow has external insulation.

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    26/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 26

    Smallest Duct

    Dimension

    Octave Band Center Frequency Hz

    63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

    Attenuation To 4" 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 2.0 3.0

    Of Unlined 5"-10" 0 0 0 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.0

    Elbows 11"-20" 0 0 0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0

    Rectangula 21"-40" 0 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0

    Duct dB/ft 41"-80"+ 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0

    Fig. 1-16: Unlined Rectangular and Round Elbows

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10C, p. 11.16)

    The attenuation of lined rectangular and round elbows is given in Fig. 1-23.

    Smallest Duct

    Dimension

    Octave Band Center Frequency Hz

    63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

    Attenuation To 4" 0 0 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 6.0

    Of lined Elbows 5"-10" 0 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 6.0 8.0

    Round & 11"-20" 0 1.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0

    Rectangular 21"-40" 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 8.0 10.0

    Duct dB/ft 41"-80"+ 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0

    Fig. 1-23: Lined Rectangular and Round Elbows

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10D, p. 11.16)

    Octave Band Center Frequency Hz

    63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

    Branch 0.2% 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27

    Duct 0.5% 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23

    Attenuation 1.0% 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

    2.0% 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17

    5.0% 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13

    10.0% 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

    20.0% 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

    50.0% 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

    Fig. 1-24: Branch Takeoff Attenuation

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.11A, p. 11.18)

    %=CFMSystem

    CFMRoomCriticalFirst

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    27/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 27

    The program calculates the attention of branch takeoffs using Fig. 1-24. This table gives the

    branch duct attenuation as a function of the percentage of the room to the system air flow

    quantities for all eight octave bands.

    The program computes the attenuation available through end reflection loss using Fig. 1-25.

    Smallest

    Duct

    Dimensions

    Octave Band Center Frequency Hz

    63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

    Duct

    Diameter

    End

    Reflection

    Loss

    To 5" 17 12 8 4 1 0 0 0

    6"-8" 14 10 6 2 0 0 0 0

    9"-12" 12 8 4 1 0 0 0 0

    13"-16" 10 6 2 0 0 0 0 0

    17"-22" 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 0

    23"-30" 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

    31"-40" 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

    41"-60"+ 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Fig. 1-25: Duct End Reflection Loss

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10B, p. 11.18)

    RoomVolume

    CeilingHeight

    Octave Band Center Frequency Hz

    63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

    Room 1000 8' 2 2 2 2

    Effect 2000 8' 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6

    (for 5000 8'-12" 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9

    average 10000 8'-10" 7 8 8 8 9 9 9 10

    rooms) 10000 11'-14" 8 9 9 9 10 10 10 11

    20000 8'-12" 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12

    20000 13'-15" 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13

    30000 8'-11" 11 12 12 12 13 13 13 14

    30000 12'-15" 12 13 13 13 14 14 14 15

    40000+ 8'-14" 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14

    40000+ 15'-17" 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15

    40000+ 18'-22" 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16

    Fig. 1-26: Room Effect Attenuation

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.10C, p. 11.18)

    The program calculates the room effect attenuation using Fig. 1-26. This table gives the

    attenuation for room with suspended ceilings as a function of the ceiling height and room

    volume for all eight octave bands.

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    28/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 28

    Room Criteria

    Fig. 1-27 gives the sound pressure levels for all eight octave bands that correspond with a

    specified NC level for the room.

    Octave Band Center Frequency Hz

    63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

    NC

    Noise

    Criterion

    Levels

    NC-30 57 48 35 31 29 28 28 27

    NC-35 60 53 46 40 36 34 33 32

    NC-40 64 57 51 45 41 39 38 37

    NC-45 67 60 54 49 46 44 43 42NC-50 71 64 59 54 54 49 48 47

    Fig. 1-27: Sound Pressure Levels

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Systems Duct Design, SMACNA, Table 11.11D, p. 11.18)

    Material Estimation

    Classification of Ducts

    This feature of the program allows you to select a gage or thickness and reinforcement required

    for the ducts once they have been sized.

    Operating pressures for each section of ductwork are calculated earlier during the pressure

    analysis. Fig. 1-28 gives the pressure class for each section and corresponding operating

    pressure. Once the operating pressures are determined, the sections are analyzed based on the

    specified shape, rectangular/oval or round.

    Static Pressure

    Pressure Class Operating Pressure

    0.5 in. of water up to 0.5 in. of water

    1 in. of water over 0.5 in. of water to 1 in. of water

    2 in. of water over 1 in. of water to 2 in. of water

    3 in. of water over 2 in. of water to 3 in. of water

    4 in. of water over 3 in. of water to 4 in. of water

    6 in. of water over 4 in. of water to 6 in. of water

    10 in. of water over 6 in. of water to 10 in. of water

    Fig. 1-28 Operating Pressures

    (reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA, p. 106)

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    29/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 29

    Duct Materials

    The thickness and weight of sheet-metal sheets available in the program are given in Fig. 1-29

    throughFig. 1-32reproduced with permission fromHVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,Appendix 1 through 4. The program uses the nominal thicknesses from the tables. Minimum

    and maximum thicknesses are shown for your information only.

    Gage

    Thickness in InchesWeight

    Lb/ft2

    Min Max Nom

    30 .0105 .0145 .0125 .525

    28 .0136 .0176 .0156 .656

    27 .0142 .0202 .0172 .722

    26 .0158 .0218 .0188 .788

    25 .0189 .0249 .0219 .919

    24 .0220 .0280 .0250 1.050

    23 .0241 .0321 .0281 1.181

    22 .0273 .0353 .0313 1.313

    21 .0304 .0384 .0344 1.444

    20 .0335 .0415 .0375 1.575

    19 .0388 .0488 .0438 1.838

    18 .0450 .0550 .0500 2.100

    17 .0513 .0613 .0563 2.36316 .0565 .0685 .0625 2.625

    15 .0643 .0763 .0703 2.953

    14 .0711 .0851 .0781 3.281

    12 .0100 .1184 .1094 4.594

    11 .1150 .1350 .1250 5.250

    Fig. 1-29: Stainless Steel

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA, Appendix 1)

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    30/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 30

    M.S. Gage Weight lb/ft2

    Thickness

    Nominal Cold Rolled

    Min Max

    28 .625 .0149 in .0129 in .0169 in

    26 .750 .0179 in .0159 in .0199 in

    24 1.000 .0239 in .0209 in .0269 in

    22 1.250 .0299 in .0269 in .0329 in

    20 1.500 .0359 in .0329 in .0389 in

    18 2.000 .0478 in .0438 in .0518 in

    16 2.500 .0598 in .0548 in .0648 in

    14 3.125 .0747 in .0697 in .0797 in

    12 4.375 .1046 in .0986 in .1106 in

    Fig. 1-30: Standard Gage Uncoated Steel

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA, Appendix 2)

    Thickness in Inches Weight

    Nom. Min. Max. lb/ft2

    .016 .014 .018 .228

    .020 .0175 .0225 .285

    .024 .0215 .0265 .342

    .025 .0225 .0275 .356

    .032 .0295 .0345 .456

    .040 .037 .043 .570

    .050 .046 .054 .713

    .063 .059 .067 .898

    .080 .076 .084 1.140

    .090 .086 .094 1.283

    .100 .095 .105 1.426

    .125 .12 .13 1.782

    Fig. 1-31: Aluminum Alloy 3003-H14

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA, Appendix 3

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    31/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 31

    Gage

    Thickness in Inches Weight

    Min Max Nom Nom lb/ft2

    30 .0127 .0187 .0157 .656

    28 .0157 .0217 .0187 .781

    26 .0187 .0247 .0217 .906

    24 .0236 .0316 .0276 1.156

    22 .0296 .0376 .0336 1.406

    20 .0356 .0436 .0396 1.656

    18 .0466 .0566 .0516 2.156

    16 .0575 .0695 .0635 2.656

    14 .0705 .0865 .0785 3.281

    Fig. 1-32: Galvanized Tolerances

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA, Appendix 4)

    Rectangular Metal Duct Construction

    Duct construction requirements are listed in Fig. 1-33 through Fig. 1-39, reproduced with

    permission fromHVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA, Tables 1-3 through 1-9, pp. 1-16 -

    1-22. The program uses these tables to determine the gage and reinforcement required for thematerial used in a rectangular or oval duct section.

    Since the greater dimension of a rectangular duct is more likely to deform, that dimension is

    assumed to be critical. A gage, reinforcement spacing and tie rod requirement corresponding to

    the working pressure in the duct is chosen from the table. The smaller dimension is analyzed

    using the gage and reinforcement chosen for the greater dimension.

    You can use the override forms to specify the reinforcement spacing. If you specify an override,

    the program will check the table and determine the gage and reinforcement rigidity class for that

    spacing. If there is no gage for that spacing, your override will be ignored. The program will

    proceed to choose the appropriate gage, reinforcement spacing and tie rod requirement.

    AsFig. 1-33throughFig. 1-39 are based on galvanized steel, the program will first find the duct

    construction requirements for that material then find the equivalent construction requirements

    for other materials. For aluminum ducts, the thickness is determined fromFig. 1-40whileFig. 1-

    41is used to determine the reinforcement.

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    32/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 32

    Duct

    Dimension(in.)

    Duct

    Gauge (No

    Reinforce-ment)

    Minimum Rigidity Class on Minimum Guage Duct

    Re-inforcement Spacing

    10 8 5 4 3 2-1/2 2

    10 dn. 12 14 16 18 26 ga.

    20 24 ga. A-26 22 22 ga. A-26 24 22 ga. A-26

    26 20 ga. A-26 28 18 ga. B-24 B-26 30 18 ga. B-24 B-26 36 16 ga. C-22 C-24 C-26 42 D-20 D-24 D-26 C-26 48 E-20 D-22 D-26 54 E-18 E-20 D-26 60 F-18 F-20 E-24 E-26

    72 H-16

    F+rod

    G-18

    F+rod F-22 F-24

    84 H-16

    F+rod

    H-22

    +rod

    G-24

    F+rod

    96 I-16

    F+rod

    H-20

    F+rod

    H-22

    F+rod

    97 UP H-18

    Fig. 1-33: 1/2-inch W.G.

    Rectangular duct reinforcement for 1/2" of water, positive and negative static pressure

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    33/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 33

    Duct

    Dimension(in.)

    Duct

    Gauge (No

    Reinforce-ment)

    Minimum Rigidity Class on Minimum Guage Duct

    Re-inforcement Spacing

    10 8 5 4 3 2-1/2 2

    10 dn. 12 26 ga.

    14 24 ga. A-26 16 22 ga. A-24 A-26 18 22 ga. A-24 A-26 20 20 ga. A-24 A-26 22 18 ga. A-24 A-26 24 18 ga. B-24 A-26

    26 18 ga. B-22 B-24 A-26 28 16 ga. C-22 C-24 B-26 30 16 ga. C-22 C-24 B-26 36 D-20 D-22 C-26 42 E-18 D-20 D-24 D-26 48 F-16 E-18 E-24 D-26

    54 G-16

    F+rod F-18 E-22 E-24

    60 G-18

    F+rod F-22 F-24

    72 H-18

    F+rod

    G-22

    F+rod

    G-24

    F+rod

    84 I-18

    F+rod

    H-20

    F+rod

    H-22

    F+rod

    96 J-16

    F+rod

    I-18

    F+rod

    I-20

    F+rod

    I-22

    F+rod

    97 UP H-18t

    Fig. 1-34: 1-inch W.G.Rectangular duct reinforcement for 1" of water, positive and negative static pressure

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA, Table 1-4, p. 1-17)

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    34/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 34

    Duct

    Dimension

    (in.)

    Duct Gauge(No Rein-

    forcement)

    Minimum Rigidity Class on Minimum Gauge Duct

    Reinforcement Spacing

    10' 8' 5' 4' 3' 2-

    1/2' 2'

    10 dn. 26 ga. - - - - - - -

    12 24 ga. A-26 - - - - -

    14 22 ga. A-24 A-26 - - - -

    16 20 ga. A-22 A-24 A-26 - - - -

    18 20 ga. A-22 A-24 A-26 - - - -

    20 18 ga. B-20 B-22 A-26 - - - -

    22 16 ga. B-20 B-22 A-26 - - - -

    24 16 ga. C-20 C-22 B-26 - - - -

    26

    NOT

    ALLOWED

    C-20 C-22 B-26 - - - -28 C-18 C-20 C-24 B-26 - - -

    30 D-18 D-20 C-24 C-26 - - -

    36 E-16 E-18 D-22 D-24 - - -

    42 E-16 E-22 E-24 - - -

    48 G-16 F-20 E-22 E-24 - -

    54 G-18

    F+rod F-20 F-24 - -

    60 H-18

    F+rod

    G-20

    F+rod

    G-22

    F+rod

    G-24

    F+rod -

    72 I-16F+rod

    H-18F+rod

    H-22F+rod

    - H-24F+rod

    84 J-18

    F+rod

    I-20

    F+rod -

    I-22

    F+rod

    96 K-16

    G+rod

    K-18

    G+rod

    J-26

    F+rod -

    97 UP H-18t

    Fig. 1-35: 2-inch W.G.

    Rectangular duct reinforcement for 2" of water, positive and negative static pressure

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,Table 1-5, p. 1-18)

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    35/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 35

    DuctDimension,

    in.

    No

    Reinforce-

    ment Duct

    Gauge

    Minimum Rigidity Class on Minimum Gauge Duct

    Reinforcement Spacing

    10' 8' 5' 4' 3' 2' 2'

    10 dn. 24

    12 22 A-24 A-24 - - - -

    14 20 A-22 A-24 - - - -

    16 18 A-22 A-24 - - - -

    18 18 A-22 A-24 - - - -

    20 16 B-18 B-20 A-24 - - - -

    22 16 C-18 B-20 B-24 - - - -

    24 16 C-18 C-18 B-24 - - - -

    26

    NOT

    D-18 D-18 C-24 - - - -

    28 D-18 D-18 C-22 C-24 - - -

    30 D-16 D-18 C-22 C-24 - - -

    36 E-16 E-20 D-24 - - -

    42 E-20 E-22 E-24 - -

    48 G-18 F-20 E-22 E-24 -54 H-18

    F+rod

    H-18

    F+rod

    G-22

    F+rod

    E-24 -

    60 H-16

    F+rod

    H-18

    F+rod

    G-20

    F+rod

    G-24

    F+rod

    -

    72 I-16

    F+rod

    H-20

    F+rod

    H-22

    F+rod

    H-24

    F+rod

    84 J-18

    F+rod

    I-20

    F+rod

    I-22

    F+rod

    96 L-16

    G+rod

    K-18

    G+rod

    J-20

    G+rod97 UP H-18t H-18t

    Fig. 1-36: 3-inch W.G.

    Rectangular duct reinforcement for 3" of water, positive and negative static pressure

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,

    Table 1-6, p. 1-19)

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    36/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 36

    DuctDimension,

    in.

    No

    Reinforce-ment

    Duct

    Gauge

    Minimum Rigidity Class on Minimum Gauge Duct

    Reinforcement Spacing

    10' 8' 5' 4' 3' 2' 2'

    8 dn. 24 ga.

    10 22 ga. A-24

    12 20 ga. A-22 A-22 A-24

    14 18 ga. A-20 A-22 A-24

    16 18 ga. A-20 A-20 A-24

    18 16 ga. B-18 B-20 A-24

    20

    NOT

    ALLOWED

    C-18 C-20 B-24

    22 C-18 C-18 B-24

    24 D-18 D-18 C-22 C-24

    26 D-18 D-18 C-22 C-24

    28 E-18 E-18 D-22 D-24

    30 E-18 E-18 D-22 D-24

    36 E-20 E-22 D-24

    42 F-18 F-20 E-22 E-24

    48 G-18 G-18 F-22 F-22 E-24

    54 H-16

    F+rod

    H-18

    F+rod

    G-20

    F+rod

    G-22

    F+rod

    F-24

    60 I-16

    F+rod

    I-16

    F+rod

    H-20

    F+rod

    H-22

    F+rod -24

    F+rod

    72 I-18

    F+rod

    I-20

    F+rod

    H-22

    F+rod

    84 K-16

    G+rod

    J-18

    F+rod

    J-20

    F+rod

    96 L-16G+rod K-20G+rod

    97 UP H-18t H-18t

    Fig. 1-37: 4-inch W.G.

    Rectangular duct reinforcement for 4" of water, positive static pressure

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,

    Table 1-7, p. 1-20)

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    37/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 37

    DuctDimension

    , in.

    No

    Reinforce-

    ment Duct

    Gauge

    Minimum Rigidity Class on Minimum Gauge Duct

    Reinforcement Spacing

    10' 8' 5' 4' 3' 2' 2'

    8 dn. 24

    10 20 A-24

    12 18 A-20 A-20 A-24

    14 18 A-20 A-20 A-22 A-24

    16 16 B-18 B-18 A-22 A-24

    18

    NOT

    ALLOWED

    C-18 C-18 B-22 B-24

    20 C-16 C-18 B-22 B-24 22 D-16 C-18 C-22 C-24

    24 D-18 C-22 C-22 C-24

    26 D-16 D-20 C-22 C-24

    28 E-16 D-20 D-22 C-24

    30 D-18 D-22 D-24

    36 F-18 E-20 E-22 E-24

    42 G-16 G-18 F-20 E-22

    48 H-18 H-18 G-22

    54 H-16

    F+rod

    H-18

    F+rod

    H-20

    F+rod

    G-22

    F+rod

    60 H-18

    F+rod

    H-20

    F+rod

    H-22

    F+rod

    72 J-16

    F+rod

    J-18

    F+rod

    I-20

    F+rod

    84 L-16

    G+rod

    K-18

    G+rod

    96 L-16

    G+rod

    97 UP H-18t

    Fig. 1-38: 6-inch W.G.

    Rectangular duct reinforcement for 6" of water, positive static pressure

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,

    Table 1-8, p. 1-21)

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    38/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 38

    DuctDimension,

    in.

    No

    Reinforce-

    ment Duct

    Gauge

    Minimum Rigidity Class on Minimum Gauge Duct

    Reinforcement Spacing

    10' 8' 5' 4' 3' 2' 2'

    8 dn. 22 A-24

    10 18 A-22 A-24

    12 16 A-18 A-22 A-24

    14

    NOT

    ALLOWED

    B-18 A-20 A-22 A-24

    16 B-16 B-20 B-22 B-24

    18 C-16 C-20 B-22 B-24

    20 D-16 C-18 C-20 B-24 22 C-18 C-20 C-24

    24 D-18 D-20 C-24

    26 D-18 D-20 D-22 C-24

    28 E-18 D-20 D-22 C-24

    30 E-16 E-18 D-22 D-24

    36 F-16 F-18 F-20 E-22 E-24

    42 H-16 G-18 G-20 F-22

    48 H-18 H-18 G-22

    54 I-16

    F+rod

    H-18

    F+rod

    H-20

    F+rod

    60 J-16

    F+rod

    I-18

    F+rod

    I-20

    F+rod

    72 K-16

    F+rod

    K-18

    F+rod

    84 H-16

    96 H-16t

    97 UP H-16t

    Fig. 1-39: 10-inch W.G.

    Rectangular duct reinforcement for 10" of water, positive static pressure

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,

    Table 1-9, p. 1-22)

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    39/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 39

    Galvanized Steel Commercial Size (in.)

    28 .025

    26 .032

    24 .040

    22 .050

    20 .063

    10 0.080

    16 .090

    Fig. 1-40: Aluminum Commercial Sizes

    Galvanized steel gauge conversion to aluminum sheet thickness(reproduced with permission fromHVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,

    Table 1-14, p. 1-32)

    Galvanized Rigidity Class Aluminum Dimension

    per Galvanized Class

    A C

    B D

    C E

    D F

    E H

    F H

    G I

    H K

    Fig. 1-41: Rigidity Class Conversion

    Galvanized steel rigidity conversion

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,Table 1-15, p. 1-32)

    Round Metal Duct Construction

    Duct construction requirements for round galvanized steel and aluminum ducts are given in Fig.

    1-42 and Fig. 1-43, reproduced with permission from HVAC Duct Construction Standards,

    SMACNA, Table 3-2 and 3-3, pp. 3-3, 3-4. These tables give the galvanized steel gauge and the

    aluminum commercial size as a function of static pressure, type of seam (spiral or longitudinal)

    and diameter. The program uses these tables to select the gage for round ducts.

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    40/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 40

    Duct

    Diameter

    in Inches

    Maximum 2" w.g.

    Static Positive

    Maximum 10" w.g.

    Static Positive

    Maximum 2" w.g.

    Static Negative

    Spiral

    Seam

    Gauge

    Longitudi

    nal Seam

    Gauge

    Spiral

    Seam

    Gauge

    Longitudi

    nal

    Seam

    Gauge

    Spiral

    Seam

    Gauge

    Longitudi

    nal

    Seam

    Gauge

    8 28 28 26 24 28 24

    14 28 26 26 24 26 24

    26 26 24 24 22 24 22

    36 24 22 22 20 22 20

    50 22 20 20 20 20 18

    60 20 18 18 18 18 16

    84 18 16 18 16 16 14

    Fig. 1-42: Gauge Selection

    Round duct gauge selection, galvanized steel

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,

    Table 3-2, p. 3-3)

    Duct Diameterin Inches

    Maximum 2" w.g.Static Positive

    Maximum 2" w.g.Static Negative

    Spiral

    Seam Gauge

    Longitudinal

    Seam Gauge

    Spiral

    Seam Gauge

    Longitudinal

    Seam Gauge

    8 .025 .032 .025 .040

    14 .025 .032 .032 .040

    26 .032 .040 .040 .050

    36 .040 .050 .050 .063

    50 .050 .063 .063 .080

    60 .063 .080 N.A. .090

    84 N.A. .090 N.A. N.A.

    Fig. 1-43: Aluminum Gauge Schedule

    Aluminum round duct gauge schedule

    (reproduced with permission fromHVAC Duct Construction Standards, SMACNA,

    Table 3-3, p. 3-4)

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    41/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 41

    Quantity Takeoffs

    Ductwork

    Since the unit weight of all sheet-metal sheets is pounds per square foot of surface area, the

    program therefore calculates the surface area of all ductwork to be used.

    The program then calculates the total weight of sheet-metal ductwork on the basis of gauge for

    fibrous ducts and commercial size for aluminum ducts. The one-inch thick fibrous glass ducts are

    estimated on a per square foot basis.

    The program calculates the quantity of flexible ducts based on the diameter and linear foot of

    flexible ducts. Duct reinforcements are not included in the weights of the ductwork.

    Lining and Insulation

    The program calculates the lining and insulation quantity takeoff on a per square foot basis.

    Appendix Three: Duct Fittings

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    42/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 42

    Figures and tables appearing in this appendix are reprinted with permission from HVAC Systems

    Duct Design, SMACNA, 1981. Use the table to identify the figure that corresponds to each

    keyword choice on thefittypesform.

    Keyword Table andFigure

    el001el002el007

    6-6: A6-6: B6-6: C

    el003el004el005el006

    6-6: D6-6: F6-6: G6-6: H

    tc001 6-8: Atd001

    td003td004

    6-7: A

    6-7: C6-7: D

    td002td005td006

    6-7: B6-7: J6-7: E

    jc001jc002jc003jc004jc005jc006jc007jc008

    jc009

    6-9: A6-9: B6-9: C6-9: D6-9: E6-9: F6-9: G6-9: H

    6-9: Ijd001jd002jd003jd004jd005jd006jd007jd008jd009

    6-10: A6-10: B6-10: G6-10: H6-10: I6-10: J6-10: K6-10: L6-10: M

    jd010jd011jd012

    jd013jd014jd015

    6-10: N6-10: Q6-10: V

    6-10: U6-10: W6-10: X

    Duct Cross Section to which Coefficient "C" is referred is at the top of each table. Negative

    numbers indicate that the static regain exceeds the dynamic pressure loss of the fitting.

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    43/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 43

    Table 6-6 LOSS COEFFICIENTS, ELBOWS

    Use the velocity pressure (Vp) of the upstream section. Fitting Loss (TP) = C x Vp

    A. Elbow, Smooth Radius (Die Stamped), Round (2)

    Coefficients for 90 Elbows: (See Note 1)

    R.D. 0.5 0.75 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

    C 0.71 0.33 0.22 0.15 0.13 0.12

    Note 1: For angles other than 90 multiply by the following factors:

    H 0 20 30 45 60 75 90 110 130 150 180

    K 0 0.31 0.45 0.60 0.78 0.90 1.00 1.13 1.20 1.28 1.40

    B. Elbow, Round, 3 to 5 pc -- 90 (2)

    Coefficient C

    #Pieces

    R.D.

    0.5 0.75 1.0 1.5 2.0

    5 - 0.46 0.33 0.24 0.19

    4 - 0.50 0.37 0.27 0.24

    5 0.98 0.54 0.42 0.34 0.33

    Coefficient C (See Note 2)

    H 20 30 45 60 75 90

    C 0.08 0.16 0.34 0.55 0.81 1.2

    Note 2: Correction factor for Reynolds number -- KRe

    Re10-4

    1 2 3 4 6 8 10 14

    KRe 1.40 1.26 1.19 1.14 1.09 1.06 1.04 1.0

    For Standard Air: Re= 8.56 DV

    where: D = duct diameter inches

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    44/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 44

    D. Elbow, Rectangular, Mitered (15)

    Coefficient C (See Note 2 -- Page 6.13)

    H

    H W

    0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 8.0

    20 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05

    30 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.11

    45 0.38 0.37 0.36 0.34 0.33 0.31 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.24

    60 0.60 0.59 0.57 0.55 0.52 0.49 0.46 0.43 0.41 0.39 0.38

    75 0.89 0.87 0.84 0.81 0.77 0.73 0.67 0.63 0.71 0.58 0.57

    90 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 0.98 0.92 0.89 0.85 0.83

    E. Elbow, Rectangular, Mitered with Converging or Diverging Flow (15)

    Coefficient C (See Note 2 -- Page 6.13)

    H W

    W1W

    0.6 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.6 2.0

    0.25 1.8 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1

    1.0 1.7 1.4 1.0 0.95 0.90 0.84

    4.0 1.5 1.1 0.81 0.76 0.72 0.66

    1.5 1.0 0.69 0.63 0.60 0.55

    F. Elbow, Rectangular, Smooth Radius without Vanes (15)

    Coefficients for 90 elbows (See Note 1)

    Coefficient C (See Note 3)

    R WH W

    0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 8.0

    0.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2

    0.75 0.57 0.52 0.48 0.44 0.40 0.39 0.39 0.40 0.42 0.43 0.44

    1.0 0.27 0.2 0.23 0.21 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.27 0.21

    1.5 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.17

    2.0 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15

    Note 3: Correction Factor for Reynolds number -- K Re

    R WRe10

    -4

    1 2 3 4 6 8 10 14 20

    0.5 1.40 1.26 1.19 1.14 1.09 1.06 1.04 1.0 1.0

    0.75 2.0 1.77 1.64 1.56 1.46 1.38 1.30 1.15 1.0

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    45/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 45

    Install Equation Editor and double-

    click here to view equation.

    For Standard Air: Re= 8.56 DV

    where: D = duct diameter, inches V = duct velocity, fpm

    G. Elbow, Rectangular, Smooth Radius with Splitter Vanes (2)

    NOTES FOR THIS FIGURE ONLY:

    A) See Page 5.12 to calculate splitter vane spacing.B) CR = Curve RatioC) Use correction factors in Note 1 on Page 6.13 for elbows otherthan90.

    Coefficient C

    1

    spli

    tter

    van

    e

    R W C RH W

    0.25 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0

    0.05 0.218 0.52 0.40 0.43 0.49 0.55 0.66 0.75 0.84 0.93 1.0 1.1

    0.10 0.302 0.36 0.27 0.25 0.28 0.30 0.35 0.39 0.42 0.46 0.49 0.52

    0.15 0.361 0.28 0.21 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.22 0.25 0.26 0.28 0.30 0.32

    0.20 0.408 0.22 0.16 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.21

    0.25 0.447 0.18 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15

    0.30 0.480 0.15 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12

    0.35 0.509 0.13 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09

    0.40 0.535 0.11 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07

    0.45 0.557 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06

    0.50 0.577 0.09 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.050.05 0.362 0.26 0.20 0.22 0.25 0.28 0.33 0.37 0.41 0.45 0.48 0.51

    0.10 0.450 0.17 0.13 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.19 0.20 0.21

    0.15 0.507 0.12 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11

    0.20 0.550 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07

    0.25 0.585 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05

    0.30 0.613 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04

    0.35 0.638 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03

    0.40 0.659 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02

    0.45 0.677 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02

    0.50 0.693 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

    0.05 0.467 0.11 0.10 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.19 0.21 0.22 0.23

    0.10 0.549 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09

    0.15 0.601 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05

    0.20 0.639 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03

    0.25 0.669 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02

    0.30 0.693 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

    0.35 0.714 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

    0.40 0.731 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

    0.45 0.746 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

    0.50 0.760 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    46/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 46

    H. Elbow, Rectangular, Mitered with Turning Vanes(2)

    SINGLE THICKNESS VANES

    *No

    .

    Dimensions, inches Coef

    f

    R S L C

    1 2.0 1.5 0.75 0.12

    2 4.5 2.25 0 0.15

    3 4.5 3.25 1.60 0.18

    *Numbers are for reference only.

    *When extension of trailing edge is not provided for this vane, losses

    are approximately unchanged for single elbows, but increase

    considerably for elbows in series.

    DOUBLE THICKNESS VANES

    Coefficient C

    *No

    .

    Dimensions,

    in.

    Velocity (V), fpm

    Remarks

    R S 1000 2000 3000 4000

    1 2.0 1.5 0.27 0.22 0.19 0.17 Embossed Vane Runner

    2 2.0 1.5 0.33 0.29 0.26 0.23 Push-On Vane Runner

    3 2.0 2.13 0.38 0.31 0.27 0.24 Embossed Vane Runner

    4 4.5 3.25 0.26 0.21 0.18 0.16 Embossed Vane Runner

    *Numbers are for reference only.

    I. Elbows, 90, Rectangular, Z-Shaped(15)

    Coefficients for WH = 1.0 (See Notes 4 and 5)

    LH 0 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0

    C 0 0.62 0.90 1.6 2.6 3.6 4.0 4.2 4.2 4.2

    LH 2.4 2.8 3.2 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 9.0 10.0

    C 3.7 3.3 3.2 3.1 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.3

    Note 4:For W/H values other than 1.0 apply the following favctor:

    WH 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 4.0 6.0 8.0

    K 1.10 1.07 1.04 1.0 0.95 0.90 0.83 0.78 0.72 0.70

    Note 5:Correction factor for Reynolds number -- K Re

    Re104

    1 2 3 4 6 8 10 14

    KRe 1.40 1 .26 1.19 1\.1

    4

    1.09 1.06 1.04 1.0

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    47/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 47

    Install Equation Editor and double-

    click here to view equation.

    For Standard Air:

    Re = 8.56 D Vwhere: D= hydraulic diameter, inches V = duct velocity, fpm

    J. Elbows, 90, Rectangular in Different Planes(15)

    Coefficients for H/W - 1.0: (See Notes 4 & 5 -- Page 6.16)

    L/W 0 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0

    C 1.2 2.4 2.9 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1

    L/W 2.4 2.8 3.2 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 9.0 10.0

    C 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.3

    K. Elbows, 30, Round, Offset(15)

    Coefficient C (See Note 5 -- Page 6.16)

    L/D 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

    C 0 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16

    L. Elbows, 90, Rectangular Wye or Tee Shape

  • 8/9/2019 AES Ducts Engineering Basis

    48/68

    Ductwork Design Program - Engineering Basis SOM-IBM Architecture & Engineering Series (AES) - 1988

    Varkie C. Thomas, Ph.D., P.E. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP 48

    Table 6-7 LOSS COEFFICIENTS TRANSITIONS (Diverging Flow)

    Use the velocity pressure (Vp) of the upstream section. Fitting loss (TP) = C x Vp

    A. Transition, Round, Conical(15)

    Re= 8.56 DV

    where:

    D = Upstream

    Diameter (inches)

    V = Upstream Velocity

    (fpm)

    Coefficient C (See Note 6)

    Re A1A

    16 20 30 45 60 90 120 180

    0.5 109

    2

    4

    6

    10

    16

    0.14

    0.23

    0.27

    0.29

    0.31

    0.19

    0.30

    0.33

    0.38

    0.38

    0.32

    0.46

    0.48

    0.59

    0.60

    0.33

    0.61

    0.66

    0.76

    0.84

    0.33

    0.68

    0.77

    0.80

    0.88

    0.32

    0.64

    0.74

    0.83

    0.88

    0.31

    0.63

    0.73

    0.84

    0.88

    0.30

    0.62

    0.72

    0.83

    0.88

    2 109

    2

    4

    6

    10

    16

    0.07

    0.15

    0.19

    0.20

    0.21

    0.12

    0.18

    0.28

    0.24

    0.28

    0.23

    0.36

    0.44