Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

24
Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center Interlaboratory comparisons results and future work

Transcript of Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Page 1: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Interlaboratory comparisons results and future work

Page 2: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Overview of results from 2016 paper…

Aerosol chemical monitor calibration center

• Illustrated the benefits of using the new full scan calibration mode.

• Highlighted the importance of the separate RIE SO4 calibration.

• Tested the mz44/NO3 artefact correction (Pieber et al).

• Proposed a new correction based on aerosol chemical composition.

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 3: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Aerosol chemical monitor calibration center -2016 results

Organic aerosol

frag_organic[44] = 44, -frag_air[44], -b*1.05*frag_nitrate[30], -b*1.05*frag_nitrate[46])

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 4: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Aerosol chemical monitor calibration center -2016 results

Organic aerosol

frag_organic[44] = 44, -frag_air[44], -b*1.05*frag_nitrate[30], -b*1.05*frag_nitrate[46])

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 5: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Aerosol chemical monitor calibration center -2016 results

Organic aerosol

frag_organic[44] = 44, -frag_air[44], -b*1.05*frag_nitrate[30], -b*1.05*frag_nitrate[46])

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 6: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Aerosol chemical monitor calibration center -2016 results

Organic aerosol

This correction assumes the magnitude of the artefact is independent of chemical composition, basing the correction on measurements made with pure NH4NO3. During this intercomparison we performed calibrations at variable nitrate mass fractions (NO3_MF) using mixtures of NH4NO3 and (NH4)2SO4, and from this data we observe that the magnitude of the artifact varies as a function of NO3_MF

Page 7: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Aerosol chemical monitor calibration center -2016 results

Organic aerosol

This correction assumes the magnitude of the artefact is independent of chemical composition, basing the correction on measurements made with pure NH4NO3. During this intercomparison we performed calibrations at variable nitrate mass fractions (NO3_MF) using mixtures of NH4NO3 and (NH4)2SO4, and from this data we observe that the magnitude of the artifact varies as a function of NO3_MF

Page 8: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Aerosol chemical monitor calibration center -2016 results

Organic aerosol

This correction assumes the magnitude of the artefact is independent of chemical composition, basing the correction on measurements made with pure NH4NO3. During this intercomparison we performed calibrations at variable nitrate mass fractions (NO3_MF) using mixtures of NH4NO3 and (NH4)2SO4, and from this data we observe that the magnitude of the artifact varies as a function of NO3_MF

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 9: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Aerosol chemical monitor calibration center -2016 results

Organic aerosol

This correction assumes the magnitude of the artefact is independent of chemical composition, basing the correction on measurements made with pure NH4NO3. During this intercomparison we performed calibrations at variable nitrate mass fractions (NO3_MF) using mixtures of NH4NO3 and (NH4)2SO4, and from this data we observe that the magnitude of the artifact varies as a function of NO3_MF

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 10: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Aerosol chemical monitor calibration center -2016 results

Organic aerosol

This correction assumes the magnitude of the artifact is independent of chemical composition, basing the correction on measurements made with pure NH4NO3. During this intercomparison we performed calibrations at variable nitrate mass fractions (NO3_MF) using mixtures of NH4NO3 and (NH4)2SO4, and from this data we observe that the magnitude of the artifact varies as a function of NO3_MF

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 11: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Aerosol chemical monitor calibration center -2016 results

Organic aerosol

Uncorrected data

Data corrected using Composition independant Correction factor

Correction based on NO3 MF

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 12: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

ILC 2016

ILC 2018

NO3_MF = 0.23 0.78

1 2 3 4 5 6

Ran additional mixtures Confirmed the stability of the

artefact at lower NO3 MF Confirmed the linear relationship

between points at higher MF. ? How do these artefacts vary for organic/inorganic mixtures

Mz 44 artefact: Organic and inorganic mixtures Long-term ambient comparison

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 13: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Levoglucason Succinic acid Glutaric acid

Mz 44 artefact: Organic and inorganic mixtures Long-term ambient comparison

• Pure organic solution, + 4 different mixtures with NH4NO3

• Distinctive average mass spectra. • Slight differences in instrument to instrument response

• 6 Q-ACSM (5 PM1 SV, 1 PM2.5 SV)

M-C. Minguillon, D. Green, L. Marmureanu, C. Marin, Z. Bibi, J. Ovadnevite

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 14: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Levoglucason

Glutaric acid Succinic acid

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 2 3 4 5 6

Ran additional mixtures High variability at low NO3 MF Highest artefact @ NO3 MF

between 0.4 and 0.6.

Mz 44 artefact: Organic and inorganic mixtures Long-term ambient comparison

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 15: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

• 6 Q-ACSM (5 PM1 SV, 1 PM2.5 SV)

• 23rd November ‘18 to 7th January ‘19

Phase 2: Long-term ambient intercomparison

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 16: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

No. 6 = PM25, SV

Phase 2: Long-term ambient intercomparison

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 17: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Phase 2: Long-term ambient intercomparison

Ciemat DWD KCL INOE SIRTA I-EPA NO3_MF never exceeded 25%

Unconstrained PMF SOFI : constrained PMF (HOA+BBOA) a =0.3

No. 6 = PM25, SV

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 18: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Phase 2: Long-term ambient intercomparison

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 19: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Other observations: Negative Chloride

Filament changed

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 20: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Negative Chl signal also observed by participants at their site. Tests: Increasing heater up to 850°C. Negative Chl signals unchanged

Other observations: Negative Chloride

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 21: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Filament changed

Filament failure mid way through sampling. Changed to a Tungsten filament (previous one was Iridium). Negative Chl signal was not directly observed after the filament change.

Other observations: Negative Chloride

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 22: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Other observations: Negative Chloride

Neg Chl does not appear to anti-correlate with any other principal species.

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 23: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Other observations: Negative Chloride

Neg Chl does not appear to anti-correlate with any other principal species.

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20

Page 24: Aerosol Chemical Monitor Calibration Center

Other observations: Negative Chloride

AMS user’ meeting, Lund # 20