Advertise to Control the minds of Americans and reduce liabilities

by: Joe Strong

Published by uPublish.info

Advertise to Control the minds of Americans and reduce liabilities for Pharmaceutical Co.'s, andCorporations, with deceptions founded in Science Let us look at our commercials aired today in comparison to years prior. We must ask whathappened to the commercials that targeted the population as a whole and how it benefited themass. Think about the types of automobiles that target the mainstream and what could have beenafforded by the masses? Usually autos today are very expensiveserving the few affluent, extravagant to the many needing loans outside of their budget andimpossible to afford for the majority, it's a dream for the greater number of people viewing these ads.It is the dream that is designed to have dire consequences psychologically for the have not's. It wasmeant to be given to the majority for a purpose not to sell the product rather, to create a void andwant, with an aim to afflict and incite an internal response that they cannot have. This playsrecurrent in the mind of the masses perceiving the product. These dream mechanisms arecommercially manufactured to sell the brain a bill of goods not for the sale of but to long for theunattainable. This unhealthy reminder carries hopelessness when reinforced constantly throughoutour day every day of our lives.

Let's think about that for a moment; every time these commercials repeat, a void is recalled, we'llcall it a "the lack there of." This subjects the perceiver again and again to the impossible. It is a kindof perpetual desire never to cease. These commercial marketing psychoanalysts employedby the Elites are hired to sell us the obvious primarily and stigmatize us in the same pitch. They willdefend the ads for those who oppose them and have us believe the human mind can discern andcancel the effects of these innocent ads because we are rational creatures. They postulate we as human beings have the ability to tune them outas the superfluous, data and our reasoning our inability to acquire it is the brains higher function. This is extremely difficult! Our reason is limited by these desires that overriderational thinking. And we can cancel them out of our awareness employing reason. But only with thedirected purpose to do so, repeatedly throughout all our days in front of the tube. If I were tobelieve we could tune them and not be affected by this recurrent void our mental faculty would beunhindered and free from the feeling of the lack of, as the commercial recedes into oblivion as thevoid follows and ceases to be. It is because of their frequency the void will remain and continues totouch a part of the psyche made by its first impression upon the mind. This is reinforced through itsconstancy that delivers not a product but a reaction to it. I would do a great dis service to themarvels of the brain, whether we tune it out or not, our mental impressions are enforced devoid ofreason in so far as how we feel positively to it and negatively of them. Look, If somegripe about the inappropriate commercialization these repugnant ads air, they'll say to the few indefense for the many; "Turn the volume down if you don't want to hear it, it's your choice, and it'syour right to do so". They'll say," that ad was paid for and has a right to air at the client's discretionand for the benefit of all",

This underlying data flows with purpose. I think it is a sociological conditioner, created to make usfeel a certain way. If longings create dissatisfaction within, our thoughts and feelings are opportuneto flip our present relative every day unsatisfied condition in our world to believe the dream aspreferable yet purposely given to us never to be satisfied (Commercial enticements made to be

Page 1

unattainable. It is a lack of fulfillment whereby reality becomes disillusioned to overshadow reason. Today the majority of car commercials are not for the public at large. This marginalization made to disillusion people is made deliberate hiding in plainsight behind the sales. Deliberate to impact the impossible attainment of such commodities for themajorities to internalize inabilities. Those of my generation who had watched the auto commercialsin the sixties were accustomed, seeing American made cars with sticker prices that did not range tothe unattainable end for the majority. We saw ads like Soap commercials, Bic pens, Macy's andGimble's department stores, Bayer Aspirin, Ant-acids and the like. There was no extravagance in the commercials leading us into a want forthe unattainable. The normal back then I can remember, was Chrysler, Ford Chevrolet, Plymouth,Dodge and occasionally Volkswagen were mainly aired. It was the Cadillac commercials which werevery few. Caddy was the top on the list for luxury advertisement. "Let Hertz put you in the driver'sseat".

Let's look at today's commercials inundated with Pharmaceutical ads as well. Before simple over thecounter items were played for the masses, aspirins, antacids and the like was the typical. TodayFDA approved prescription items are broadcasted to the public through commercials now. "Whenwere we given license to petition the professionals?" When did we become the consultant to thedoctors to suggest a medication solely by being wooed by a model or actor in commercials? When did we become the salesperson for a Corporation through a sales pitch? The lists ofside effects that carry warnings to the effects of damage the person could be subject to are alwaysmore than the one cure cited. Remeber these are new pharmaceuticals with reletively short test life.These disclaimers are always added at the commercial end after the miraculous benefits theseactors portray for our benefit and possible harmful side effects to follow. It's dispicable andunconscionable that we the public are subjected to watch rules of disclosure and its oppressivecontent from drugs causing everything and including, psychotic delusion, suicidal tendencies,depression and failure of attention and focus. The Pharma Companies believe they are immune tocriticism. That is true if we refuse to speak up. I imagine once the recipient experiencing adverseside effects like; suicidal tendencies or delusion will be the first on the hotline getting support. Yeahright! they're already out of thier senses! They were not crazy before the drug, now they are andhave the where with all to help themselves. Here is the flip side to the new malady; If they do go tothe hotline they'll have a new file and will be registred a level of psychosis. The health care providerin the mental health clinic will notate. That should keep the pharmaceutical and Insurance ballrolling. The other side effects like bleeding internally, respiratory arrest, heart damage, liver disease,kidney, bone, skin, etc.; which might follow is ever so palatable . We watch this very information atthe dinner table I say; "Hey honey can you pass the potato's?"

The Psychological shocks to us at home watching T.V begins to conjure in our mind imagesdisgusting side effects while we are eating meals during family time. Why are we not questioning theethics of such peddling at our expense? Is it that we prefer not to define our feelings and its effectsupon us for the sake of entertainment? It happens in our psyche on an unconscious level we mustnow come to see. We are continually conditioned through information bombardment that render usincapable to discern its impact making us feel distressed without apparent cause. This informationoverload enables the subtle stimuli to invade our awareness innocuously for designed purposes toinstill fear and doubt. To make us incapable to alter things yet to befall us as if we have no say. Wehave become kidnapped and captive to a malicious end which underlies the marketable themes andconditioned to phrases the media has glamorized. The dichotomy of our society is a legal and a public one. Theprivate working in the public and the public thinking they are in control without constraints. Now, Lawpresents its necessity. We are merely the deck of cards to these card sharks. We can only stand intheir courts as wards as attorneys speak in our behalf. Wards of the court defines; All people are ofunsound mind and incapable to speak rationally for themselves.

Page 2

There was a time in America" when weexercised the ability to speak without a legal mouth pieces in our own behalf. But today there arefew men and women able to speak in defense of their own private interests. Unfortunately,Americans today are seen as a flock in the judicial system, needing to be herded, unable to discerntruth from fiction and more deceptively discern the Sheppard from the wolf.

Those attorneys will fight in court among themselves squabbling over the meaning of a word in all itscontextual relevancies, with all their legal jargon, befuddling the masses to a state of acquiescence.Think about the television commercials that state, "If you have had experienced seriouscomplications or death call us now at (1800-bad drugs) and let us litigate for you. Right! now, yousee the same pack of wolves writing the disclaimers protecting the corporate interests will nowdefend the afflicted. Playing both sides of the fence is usually frowned upon. Attorney's will stimulatea court action for the victims as if they were looking out for them in society. Attorney's all belong tothe same club and laugh and rejoice at the sacrifices they brought litigate before the bench. Mostdispicable is these commercials are designed for human experimentation, to acquire data. This is done specifically to tailor and expand disclaimers from the hazardous side effects to minimizeliability to Pharm Co.'s and block future malpractice suits against doctors."When did it become our choice to filter these commercials out that we are subject to"? It is our rightto mute the volume or change the channel. "This is important to note"; Regardles we change thechannel or mute it; it had been successfully delivered. Just because we invite the program intoour perception, we should not be subjected to conditions that the programmers use to infect us withthese mental viruses making us believe everything is outside of our control. This type of hijackingmust come to an end for the benefit of all Americans. It violates the public trust by those we haveput our trust into. We do not need polls or surveys denoting adverse effects to us emotionally inpercentages. We know by how we feel internally. We have to watch this crap for the purpose toadjudicate for both the plaintiff and defendants' rights for Courts accounts and the fee. We mustemploy common sense, become responsible and make them accountable to what we know based inreason.....We need not ask Attorney's when all that is needed is self-examination and how it affectsus. This act to invade our emotions is both unethical and contemptible. We should rise and say tothe Networks, Remove it! You have been put on notice! If you fail to do so we will make you liable. It is our rightto have good ads and programs that are moral, ethical and comprehendible without the residualslime it leaves behind in our mind. It is our duty and obligation to each other to make themaccountable and hold them to it. We are not guinea pigs; we need not experience fear, sorrow, pityor abhorrence made to saturate our perception over time and weaken our resolve.

These repetitive inundations are scrupulously designed by Psychologist. They are employed by their masters bidding. The purpose is to ingrain and accept our inadequacies; so we may conformto, agree with and to stultify our minds with the inability to act on our own. The message we receiveis; without counsel to help us think then, we are in danger. These entities acting as Sheppard's leadthe flock in hypnotic, repetitive and continual spirals we agree to follow without hesitation nor toquestion the goal of the path. Do we ever wonder why it has become normal to tune things outwhen we hear things on the tube? Think about our kids for a moment who understand little of thebroadcast? How impressionable they are without knowing the content but reacting in kind to theaudience reaction. Think that is not detrimental! "Then let me tell you my experience and what I sawfirsthand from my child watching a talk show on afternoon. The talk show aired a pedophile fatherwho beat and tortured his child from birth. The father brought the boy at that time age twelve to ahotel room, tied the boy to the bed, poured gasoline on him and set him to fire. Eight years later theboy appeared on National TV to face his father after his release from prison. Now a young man,horribly disfigured, no nose, ears, lips and eighty percent of his body burned listened to his father

Page 3

apologize for his actions. The young man's had no tear ducts but watched looked at Dad in fearwithout uttering a word. The father begged forgiveness, promised he'd always be there if the youngman would let him as he kneeled before the young man's chair saying I asked God's forgivenessand now I am asking yours. With that, the audience erupted with applause with tears in many a eye.Without invite the father jumped to embrace him but the son. My stomach sickened at that momentwatching the arms outstretched to embrace the son. It looked like the boy was in shock. It sickenedme to hear that gooey reaction from an audience of simpletons; with their OOOH'S and AAAH'S, Iwas revolted and began to get disgusted and mad. My son only four years old at the time began toapplaud with the crowd in the television audience. I remember losing my step as I moved backwardaway from the screen and watching my boy innocently joining this criminal redemption of a diabolicalact of public display." If thismeans nothing to you stop reading now because the end will have little to offer. I lost the capacity inthat moment to explain how wrong this act was to my baby. How can we define these ambiguities to reign in our homes? Please tell meHow?......Ok Johnny its like this.... This point is unrelated to commercial but bares significance in how we reactto stimuli on the most rudimentary level and how content is lost to a sensational consensual andmutual agreement with a hideous subject and how Johnny shouldn't listen to all those grownupscause they are wrong. These acts you might pardon but cannot forgive and the ones causing suchinjury should be unforgiven for the rest of their sick lives.Maybe it is because Television has adesign to desensitize us to the point of ever entertaining relevant questions about it. We acceptspoon feeding like dribbling idiots on whatever plate they decide to serve us.

Do we ever wonder why we are also inundated with Legal ads which bring suit upon others inquestion? These Larcenous Attorneys these predators and eaters of carrion would love to bring intothe arena potential clients with equally larcenous ends as well. I think they say we'll definitely getmore potential clients to feign injury. It is our job to help them, justice is blind and I litigate to win formy client right or wrong. It's up to us to sell the Courts on the facts we stack and howwe validate them. Companies employing these word masters of legalese are the same whohave written the disclaimers in warning which we are sold and warned against. The same legaleseprotects the Pharma industry and doctors malpractice insurance from attack because we had beenforewarned. Mal practice suits are argued in defense of the doctors because of full disclosure on thepart of Pharma's disclaimers and the patients request for the medication, vindicating the Doctor ofliability. We see Attorney's advertising to seek compensation from Mesothelioma, bad metals implants fromprocedures like Transvaginal mesh, young males growing breasts from Risperdal.Attorney's writethe disclaimers to protect corporate interest, use the populace as Guinea pigs for humanexperimentation and then go the field of battle to aid the afflicted and attack the corporate intereststhey protect, while originally protecting the Corporate interests and exposing dangers to an unwittingpublic. The card sharks had the deck stacked for the beginning. This Bank analogy I will present isthe same as The Corporate pay outs to victims. If we look at this in the same light on how Bankssteal money through unscrupulous practices, The Pharma Companies do the same with theexperimental guinea pigs they employ to sell a bill of goods. Example; Banks hold checks and justifypaying the larger sum first; we see they did so notwithstanding our priority to pay debts in our timelyfashion. The disregard to due diligence on the banks part results in overdrafts of thirty five dollarsadded with additional small denominations over drafted. After so many screwing's the people filesuit against them and they settle. But Banks continue the same course because it is more fruitful tosteal through scheme than the settlement to be paid. Great banking schemes!

It is the same as filing law suits for the ones who had died or had crippling health issues. For

Page 4

example: The experiments prove equitable, offset to the argument to the informed parties that theyopted into danger under full disclosure. They (Pharma Legal) hide behind ethics as to warn; givingconsideration to the ignorant which base their decision's advising the mass to solicit professionalDoctor's for a prescription because that commercial shows happy people selling the product indisguise of true recipients of. We replaced our four legged animals rats and mice with humans forexperimentation. These dogs we trust to protect the sheep are really clever criminals. We are human experimentsfor study. There is no getting around it. We willingly agree to the offer without contest and in oursilence tacitly agree to the terms. Now, if they protect the sheep (people) from the wolf (Pharma)and the wolf from the sheep other times, then they are never to be trusted. We seecommercials saying, "If you were hurt on the job call us and we will aggressively attack youremployer. (That same pack, the same firm sends a different dog will defend the other side).Commercial says, "If your sheep are menacing the wolves we will aggressively impugne anddiscredit them so you may range freely to attack at will again. These Pharma Companies are the wolves represented bythe hybrid pack. Both of these predatory animals in the media commercial realm are there to protectand fight for their sole purpose to rule our minds and steer us in dangerous directions. They are thehybrid wolf in grandma's nighty, portraying a doting and concerned emissary for our wellbeingwaiting for little red riding hood arrival. We as Americans are private working in the public and it is in our interest not to be regulated inthe name of Public Interest by guardianship. We would be remiss not to secure our interest anddefend or persecute them who blatantly deceive us as a Nation. Arewe not violated by the constancy these ads continue with no end? We are made to tolerate what ismeaningless for the greater populace so they may litigate for the few. How many of the threehundred and fifty million Americans suffer these terrible plights? I suspect few in comparison. I don'twant to hear from the government and special interest groups saying; "Everybody has a voice nomatter how few". The few have as much a voice as the lot. This is not the case and they wouldrather askew the fact than carry a truth. Rather; I believe a much more diabolical plan is atfoot. We must ask questions pertaining to why they do what they do. It is an Epistomologiclialquestion. To sell something or sell a mind altering precedent which programs feelings anddetermine how the individuals react. This plan should shock us but only when we become aware ofit. Hopefully once we realize these ploys to maneuver mind to a desired end, we will see thedespicable nature astride. We must take actions against these criminals having premeditatedoutlines to subvert the public's thought precedent with subliminal intent as a criminal act. These actsdesigned to subvert and eradicate our choice to think and accept what is chosen in a scenario weadhere to, through commercial induction. We are constantly bombarded with these ads that run sayingwhy we need someone else to speak for us, better than we could our self. Our source to our beliefsstem from information we accept as primarily true from the television set. Then we go out andfraternize with each other to agree and argue points we have no knowledge of or to its validity. Thesource of all information is hearsay without empirical proof. We accept these conditions ofacceptance because we are drawn to the actors for personal appeal, how they entertain us and weindividually give veracity to their words. After all; they are actors! Making a paycheck and their solepurpose for that is to make us believe them. Inour Courts we have the Judge within his chambers the prosecutor and defender begin to appraisethe body and substance for distribution. This stage is merely licking their chops and salivating overthe feast to be. Remember the word Plea, is a sound made by sheep and donkeys and we haveaccepted to speak in kind. This is because we are not privy to the language they speak in Court.This is all done in the name of justice and for the benefit of the public interest.

Page 5

I read: President George W. Bush, if you knew that he issued two Executive Orders as President,which 1) made all AmericanPresidents the official Dictator of America and 2) permits PharmaceuticalCompanies to release new drugs and vaccines to the public without performing the usual battery ofsafety tests? This same Executive Order also releases theFDA (Food and Drug Administration) of any liability for approvingsuch new pharmaceuticals andvaccines for distribution and saleto the general public?

Page 6