Advances of the Ortronic® Technology
-
Upload
ortronic-technology-eng -
Category
Technology
-
view
274 -
download
0
Transcript of Advances of the Ortronic® Technology
Ortronic®
HISTORY AND ADVANCES OF
ORTRONIC® TECHNOLOGY
Juan Ortigosa García, Scientist, Inventor, Entrepreneur,
President and Technical Director of Ortronic Technology,
S.L., Owner of the Ortronic® trademark, of the Ortronic®
technology and Ortronic Technology, S.L company.
HISTORY OF ORTRONIC®
TECHNOLOGY
Ortronic technology origins are the procedure patents described below, whose
inventor and owner is Mr. Juan Ortigosa:
Fundamentally based on the recovery, transformation and utilization of the Reactive
Energy, obtaining as a result a free energy generated by inductive loads.
Current advances have cost thirty years of development, without any help and no
subventions, a great effort, full of technical challenges and difficulties that someday will
be narrated in detail.
The first products were manufactured on request, one by one, handmade by Juan
Ortigosa Garcia in the garage of his own house at Galapagar, Madrid, and with the only
advertising of the references given by the first users.
Ortronic®, started to be used, as a non-registered mark in 1982 and was registered as a
mark, property of Mr. Ortigosa, in 1992.
www.ortronic.com 2
Author: Mr. Juan Ortigosa García
President of Ortronic Technology, S.L.
Ortronic is the acronym formed by the surname
Ortigosa and the word Electronic, Ortigosa-
electronic, Ort+ronic = Ortronic, origin of
Ortronic® trademark, which represents the
technology developed by the Spanish Scientist Juan
Ortigosa García, and all the products obtained from
it, based in the discovery of multiple new dimensions
of Electrical Energy, that constitutes, as a whole, the
Ortronic® Technology. A great and revolutionary
breakthrough of Electrical Energy, which
cannot be understood under the basis of the
current knowledge.
Country Number Type Situation Year
Spain 555.077 Procedure Approved 1987
USA 4.717.995 Procedure Approved 1988
Canada 1.291.528 Procedure Approved 1991
Europe 0248754 Procedure Approved 1993
In 1988, Mr. Ortigosa decided to manufacture and
commercialize Ortronic® systems and devices
abroad, moving his official residence out of Spain,
where the following companies were created:
Energía Ortronic, S.A., Ortronic Energy, AG,
Ortronic Research and Development, AG,
Ortronic Holding Anstalt, Ortronic Austria, AG y
Ortigosa Exploraçao de Patentes, LDA.
www.ortronic.com 3
In 2000 the company named Ortronic Energy, S.L. was created in Spain, with
participation of foreign capital as minority shareholders, with a participation of 8% of
the capital and a purchase option contract to extend their share to 20%, with a
payments and maturities schedule which they completely failed to fulfill, leaving the
company with no activity due to lack of operating capital.
In 2004 Mr. Ortigosa created the company Ortronic Technology, S.L., with
registered office in Madrid, Spain, which currently manufactures and commercializes
the products based in the Ortronic® Technology.
The Ortronic® systems and devices have been also manufactured and
commercialized, due to a License conceded by Ortronic Technology, S.L., in the
United States of America, specifically in Houston, Texas, by the American company
Nextec Energy, L.P.
The license was conceded for a three years period, from March 2007 to February
2010, for these following countries: Guatemala, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Mexico, Panama,
Peru and Dominican Republic.
Headquarters of
Ortronic Technology, S.L.
That license only included the products
based on the patents above mentioned, for
the following applications:
Rural Electrification: Only for users with
no connection to the electrical grid, (Off–
grid).
Emergencies: Only for users of non–
reliable electrical grids with frequent and
prolonged blackouts.
The Ortronic® systems and devices
manufactured in Houston were approved in
USA with UL standards.
HISTORY OF ORTRONIC®
TECHNOLOGY
The most revolutionary breakthrough of the Ortronic® Technology starts on
April 2010, with the development of the Electrical Power Multiplier, with an
internationally registered Process Patent, PCT.
To achieve the necessary knowledge which makes possible to multiply the
useful power, it was necessary, at first, discover the mistakes, incoherencies and
paradoxes of the present knowledge of the electricity and, at second, discover
new dimensions of the electricity and its true laws, which is the only way to
obtain the present revolutionary breakthroughs of the Ortronic® Technology.
This has been the bigger, longer and harder technical challenge, which has
prolonged over thirty years.
In order to facilitate the comprehension of the great effort that has been done, it has
been conveniently considered to describe, in a simple way, the principal mistakes of
the present knowledge of the electrical energy which technically impeded the
revolutionary breakthroughs achieved.
www.ortronic.com 4
HISTORY OF ORTRONIC®
TECHNOLOGY
D. Juan Ortigosa with his first prototypes
R&D Laboratory of Ortronic
Technology, S.L.
www.ortronic.com 5
NIKOLA TESLA AND THE
ALTERNATING ELECTRICITY
As it is well known, the great genius Nikola Tesla discovered the current alternating electricity and its true laws, but due to the Genius personality and the ill–treatment received from some inventors and capitalists of his time, he took to the grave the knowledge of alternating electricity true laws.
It is also well known that at Tesla’s death, the Pentagon contracted to Golka Associates, in Brockton, Massachusetts, for the creation of a company, with the most outstanding Scientifics of the USA, whose principal objective was to find out Tesla’s technology
in order to justify the two huge demonstrations realized by Tesla, "wireless
electricity transmission and the electric car without batteries". The company
was formed by Robert A. Golka, who had studied Tesla’s work in depth.
Under the terms of the contract with the Pentagon, they built a Transmitter in an Air
Force hangar in Wendover, Utah State, hoping to repeat the demonstration realized by
Tesla.
After several years of expensive investigation, they had to accept the failure of the
project, because they could not repeat the two most amazing demonstrations of the
history of the electrical energy, which revolutionized Edison’s electricity and the
scientific knowledge of the electricity. These demonstrations were realized in the
places described in the following paragraphs:
1. The transmission of
electricity without wires
was realized in
Colorado Springs,
transmitting 20
kilowatts of power to a
distance of 39
kilometers.
Recreation of Tesla’s
experiment (picture on the
left).
Nikola Tesla
Alternating electricity inventor
www.ortronic.com 6
NIKOLA TESLA AND THE ALTERNATING
ELECTRICITY
Despite the abundant reports of the Commission, done to justify their failure, the only
and true reason for that failure was that they did not know the true laws of the alternating
electricity, which justify the impossibility of understanding Tesla’s discoveries and their
advantages.
The ignorance of Tesla’s electricity has come up to our days, as will be shown in
this document.
The demonstration of the functioning
of an electric car without batteries was
realized in Buffalo, New York, where
Tesla electrical car was circulating,
without batteries, for a whole week.
Tesla’s car, Pierce Arrow 1930
(Picture on the right)
www.ortronic.com 7
The Theoretical Model, represented in Figure 1, does not represent the real physical
phenomenon of the alternating electricity, and it is not based on the true laws of the
alternating electricity, obtaining as result a false model which limits the potential of the
electrical energy for obtaining a work to less than a ten per cent of its real possibilities.
According to the theoretical model, represented in Figure 1, it would not have been
possible nor the wireless electricity transmission, nor the electrical car without batteries.
Both of them are described in more detail in Mr. Ortigosa article, titled, ‘History and
knowledge of the electricity’.
1. According to the theoretical model shown on figure 1, in an Alternating Electricity
generator, connected to inductive loads, there are the three following kinds of power:
Apparent or Total Power = KVA= VI, expressed in thousands of watts
Useful or Active Power = KW = Vicosφ (Yellow color)
Reactive Power = KVAr= Visenφ (Green color)
Figure 1
Unfortunately for humanity, the present knowledge of electricity is a theoretical
model, without a father, based on an erroneous interpretation of the knowledge of
Tesla, with multiple Incoherencies, Mistakes and Paradoxes, that justify the impossibility to
understand Tesla’s electricity, its true laws and its advantages.
CURRENT KNOWLEDGE VS. ORTRONIC®
TECHNOLOGY
2.- Cosφ is 1 when the load is a pure resistor, and it is 0 when the load is the ideal.
In this last case the useful power is zero, because any number multiplied by zero is
equal to zero. Conclusion: the ideal motor is the only one that does not produce
any work, which contradicts the definition of IDEAL and this could not happen if
the theoretical model represents to the true alternating electricity. A huge mistake.
3.1.-In the present knowledge, the formula W = VIcosφ, that is used to calculate the
power of the alternating electricity, appears from the following equation:
3.2.- Cosφ does not exist because, as it is well known, the electricity is not vectorial, and as
a consequence of that, the angle φ does not exist. The application of that formula is an
unacceptable mistake, knowing that the electricity is not vectorial; therefore, it does not
represent any variable of the true laws of electricity.
3.3.- The blue color graphic, from Figure 2, represents the sine variation of angle φ, during
a whole turn of the circumference, 2π radians or 360 degrees.
www.ortronic.com 8
Figure 2
𝑾 = 𝑽𝒎𝒂𝒙 𝑰𝒎𝒂𝒙
𝟐[𝒄𝒐𝒔𝝋
𝟏
𝑻 𝒅𝒕 −
𝟏
𝑻
𝑻
𝟎
𝒄𝒐𝒔 𝟐𝝎𝒕 + φ 𝒅𝒕]𝑻
𝟎
CURRENT KNOWLEDGE VS. ORTRONIC®
TECHNOLOGY
www.ortronic.com 9
Figure 3
The sine and cosine of an angle are vectorial magnitudes, with a numeric module, a
direction and a sense.
Figure 3 is copied from a textbook used in the training of technicians and electrical
engineers in our world and affirms that the sine of the angle represents the voltage of a
cycle in alternating electricity, a tremendous unacceptable mistake, demonstrable
theoretically and practically.
4.- Current knowledge does not know electricity’s true nature, causing it to be defined as
an "effect" that moves at light speed.
4.1-The EFFECT, independently of its nature, it is represented by two vectorial
magnitudes, voltage V, and current I, knowing that the electricity is not vectorial.
4.2.- The word EFFECT only means that the present knowledge does not know the true
nature of the alternating electricity, its laws, dimensions and advantages.
4.3.- About the speed of the “effect”, 300,000 kilometers per second, let’s resolve the
following Rule of three:
If, in a second, it travels 300,000 kilometers
In twenty milliseconds, it will travel X kilometers
The value of X is equal to: 6,000 kilometers
4.4.-As the twenty milliseconds are the time of a whole cycle, at a 50 Hertz frequency, the
mathematical result of the Rule of three proves that: for the generation of only one
alternating electricity cycle, the length of the circumference has to be, as minimum, 6,000
kilometers, that is a condition which is not carried out by none of present alternating
electricity generators. Another mistake.
CURRENT KNOWLEDGE VS. ORTRONIC®
TECHNOLOGY
5.- The current knowledge defines the Reactive Energy as a blind and unwatted energy,
unable even to light up a simple light bulb. ANOTHER MISTAKE derived from the
falseness of the mathematical model in which is based the electricity current
knowledge.
5.1.- Today there are Ortronic® systems and devices installed in the majority of the
countries around the world, based on the patents described at the beginning of this article,
approved in the indicated dates and countries, which are based on the recovery,
transformation and utilization of the Reactive Energy, resulting in a free energy
generated by the inductive loads, demonstrating the major mistake of the present
knowledge.
6.- According to the present knowledge, the IDEAL electrical motor is the only one which
does not produce any work, being indispensable to deviate from the ideal model in order
to start obtaining a work. AN UNACCEPTABLE HUGE MISTAKE.
www.ortronic.com 10
Tagomago island (Ibiza) electrified by Ortronic® since 2001.
CURRENT KNOWLEDGE VS. ORTRONIC®
TECHNOLOGY
www.ortronic.com 11
7.- As it is well known, the quality of an electrical motor or any other inductive load, is
defined by the quality of its coils, represented by the following formula:
Q = 𝑿𝑳
𝑹 = 𝟐𝝅𝒇𝐋
𝑹
7.1.-The motor is the ideal when the ohmic resistor, R, of its coils is zero, in which case Q
is infinite. In other words, the ideal motor is the best possible motor, the one which would
produce the maximum amount of work theoretically possible.
7.2.-The ideal electrical motor is only possible with the Ortronic® Technology, because it
establishes and demonstrates, theoretically and practically, that the energy, in the inductive
loads, it is not transformed into work, as it is believed by the present knowledge, in the
inductive loads the energy can be recovered after the work has been produced, losing only
the energy which is transformed into heat.
7.3.-By definition, the ideal motor is the one that have no losses due to the Joule effect
because its ohmic resistor is zero and, as the Ortronic® Technology transforms the
reactive energy into useful and also multiplies the useful energy, with Ortronic®, the
theoretical and practical definition of the ideal motor are the following:
7.4.-Theoretical definition: The ideal motor is the one formed by coils with an infinite
quality factor, Q, that under an energetic point of view, would work for ever, continuous
movement, because the autogenerated energy is enough for maintaining the continuous
movement of the motor. The ideal motor would only need an initial energy to start.
7.5.-Practical definition: The best possible motor, without achieving the ideal, is the
motor whose work is directly proportional to the quality factor Q of its coils, being the
amount of energy utilized inversely proportional to the quality factor Q of the coils.
As it has been seen above, the formula
used by the present knowledge, derived
from the theoretical model of Figure 1,
to calculate the alternating electricity is
false, it does not represent the true
alternating electricity and the
technicians, independently of their
academic graduation, who only know
the false model, could not understand
the Ortronic® Technology, neither
accept, technically, its advantages. New Ortronic® systems that recover the reactive
energy and multiply the power.
ADVANCES OF ORTRONIC® TECHNOLOGY
www.ortronic.com 12
ADVANCES OF ORTRONIC® TECHNOLOGY
8.- The correct formula to calculate the power in
alternating electricity, according to the knowledge
of the Ortronic® Technology, is:
𝑾 = 𝑽 ∙ 𝑰 ∙ 𝐐
Where Q is the quality factor of the inductive
load.
New power module of new Ortronic®
systems that recover the reactive energy and
multiply the power. (left image.).
8.1.- The formula represents the true alternating electricity, but it can only be understood
if are known: the true nature of the alternating electricity, its laws and dimensions,
indispensables to understand the revolutionary breakthroughs of the Ortronic®
Technology.
8.2.- The present knowledge of the alternating electricity cannot understand so
revolutionary inventions as the useful power multiplier, the inverse resonance with no
capacitor and other similar.
8.3.- The Ortronic® Technology is the unique that transforms the reactive energy into
useful energy, obtaining as a result a free energy, which is generated in the inductive loads.
8.4.- Is the unique technology that multiplies the active power by a multiplication factor
directly proportional to the quality factor, Q, of the inductive loads.
8.5.- Is the unique technology that increases the active power, of any generator, up to
reach the equality KVA=Kilowatts, i.e.: converting the total or apparent power, KVA, in
kilowatts, getting that generator works in these following conditions:
• Power factor, in the Generator–Load circuit, KW/KVA = 1.
• Inductive reactive energy in the Generator–Load circuit = 0.
• Capacitive reactive energy in the Generator–Load circuit = 0.
8.6. -The Ortronic® Technology does not correct the power factor using capacitors, it
transforms the total reactive power into active, increasing the total active power of the
generator and eliminating the total reactive energy from the distribution lines.
8.7.- The Ortronic® Technology is the unique that utilizes the reactive energy as
the unique residual energy source, to cogenerate, Ortronic® Cogeneration.
www.ortronic.com 13
ADVANCES OF ORTRONIC® TECHNOLOGY
Control unit of new power multiplier systems
8.11.- Is the unique technology that can achieve the water decomposition by inverse
resonance, applying the active power multiplier to drastically reduce the cost of the
procedure.
8.12.- The Ortronic® Technology is greatest revolutionary breakthrough of the
history of electricity.
8.13.- The Ortronic® Technology is the unique technology that can distribute the
electrical energy without wires to any part of our world.
8.14.- Is the unique technology that is developing an electrical car without batteries
so the he traditional cars supplied by combustibles or powered by PWM
technology can not compete.
8.8.- Is the unique technology that totally eliminates the reactive energy from the
distribution lines, eliminating the energy losses in them, caused by the Joule effect,
due to the reactive energy, that normally represent the fifty per cent of the total
losses.
8.9.- Is the unique technology that has achieved the alternating electricity
resonance or the inverse resonance, at any frequency.
8.10.- Is the unique technology that has achieved the inverse resonance with no
capacitor, at any value of the inductance and at any frequency.
www.ortronic.com 14
A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE WITH PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY
Example.- Losses and gains in the photovoltaic installations.
The photovoltaic solar installations connected to the electrical GRID have losses,
gains and risks, which are defined, analyzed and calculated in this document in
order to compare the differences between the Ortronic® Technology and the
PWM Technology.
The data used for the calculations are taken from a real installation located in
Toledo, Spain, connected to the electrical Grid, with a photovoltaic power of
100kW, a maximum voltage at maximum power of 495.6V and photovoltaic solar
panels Sanyo, reference HIP-210NHEI.
Photovoltaic installation located in Toledo province, Spain
www.ortronic.com 15
F1.1 F1.2 F1.3
Figure F1 Waveforms:
F1.1 = PWM Inverters. F1.2 = Electrical GRID. F1.3= Ortronic® Converters.
All the PWM inverters utilize the F1.1 waveform. The electric companies
alternators utilize the sinusoidal waveform F1.2 and the Ortronic® converters utilize
the F1.3 waveform, with a maximum voltage of 312V. The Ortronic® converters can
work at any maximum voltage between 264 and 330V.
Losses due to the voltage difference of the panels. The 495.6V in the Toledo
installation is required by the PWM inverter to obtain, at the output of the PWM
Inverter filter, a waveform similar, but not equal, to the sinusoidal waveform generated
by the alternating electricity generators, but it remains being direct electricity with
different waveform, not compatible with the alternating electricity, as it is
demonstrated by the following facts:
The voltage difference is 495.6-220=275.6V, which transformed into percentage over
the 495.6V is 55.6%, that is the losses due to the voltage difference of the
photovoltaic panels, or said in other way: The PWM inverter only utilizes the 44.4% of
the energy generated by the photovoltaic panels, losing the 55.6%.
A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE WITH PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY
www.ortronic.com 16
Risk of inverse resonance produced by the PWM Inverters. The resonance is
produced when the total capacity of the capacitors connected in the inductive loads
increases up to the corresponding value of the resonance of the GRID, said in other
words, when the total energy stored in the capacitors increases up to the corresponding
value of the resonance of the GRID.
Figure 2. Waveform of the Toledo installation, in Spain
In the Toledo installation, as can be seen at Figure 2, the current is not delayed
regarding to voltage because the PWM inverters do not send alternating electricity to
the GRID and in consequence they do not receive their proportional part of reactive
energy. This fact can be checked in any part of the world and in any photovoltaic
installation connected to a GRID with inductive loads, demonstrating that the direct
electricity, chopped or not chopped, and with any waveform, it is not compatible to the
alternating electricity.
The inductive loads only generate reactive energy when are supplied by alternating
electricity, depending on the amount of the loads, on the quality of the loads and on the
waveform of the alternating electricity.
The waveform produced by the filter of the PWM Inverters is constantly varying,
depending on the amount and quality of the inductive loads that are connected to the
GRID in each moment that is an unpredictable fact due to the amount of different
users which are using the GRID.
A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE WITH PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY
www.ortronic.com 17
The difference between the maximum voltage of the grid and the maximum voltage of
the PWM Inverter is 68V (380–312=68), in consequence, the capacitors are charged at
68+312=380 volts, producing the same effect than the produced by the increase of the
capacity of the capacitors, and as the installation of PWM Inverters connected to the
grid is constantly increasing, the inverse resonance is only a question of time due to the
following fact:
The constant increase of the PWM Inverters connected to the grid, in Photovoltaic
and Wind Generators, increase in the same proportion the capacitive reactive current
in the line, lowering the resonance frequency of the line that inevitably will reach the
required level of the line for entering in Inverse Resonance, destroying the line and
damaging the receptors which were connected, due to this it can be predicted that: The
electrical grids that utilize PWM Inverters, in Photovoltaic and Wind Generators,
go to their Self-Destruction due to Inverse Resonance.
Figure 3. Voltage difference measured in Toledo installation.
A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE WITH PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY
www.ortronic.com 18
• Losses with no load connected, as it is shown at Figure 10, they are 10 kilowatts
that in the 100 kilowatts installation are the 10%.
• Losses at full load, as it is shown at above Figure, they are 8 kilowatts that in the
100 kilowatts installation are the 8%.
• Losses at medium load, 50 kW, as it is shown at above Figure, they are the 60% that
in the 100 kilowatts installation when connected to 50 kilowatt are 30 kilowatts.
• Total losses, working in a variable power, the average losses are (10+8+30)/3 = 16
kilowatts that in the 100 kilowatts installation corresponds to 16%.
Losses due to PWM technology. The PWM inverters have several very high
losses, as a consequence of the high number of switchings per second that
PWM technology carries out, in an order of 200,000 switchings per second, fact
that generates the following losses:
A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE WITH PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY
www.ortronic.com 19
• Losses with no load connected, are lower than 10 Watts that transformed into
kilowatts are 0.010 kilowatts.
• Losses at full load, as it is shown in the above Figure are 3 kilowatts that in the 100
kilowatts installation are the 3%.
• Losses at medium load, 50 kW, as it is shown at above Figure, they are the 3% that
in the 100 kilowatts installation when connected to 50 kilowatt are 1.5 kilowatts.
• Total losses, working in a variable power, the average losses are (0.010+3+1.5)/3 =
1.503 kilowatts that in the 100 kilowatts installation corresponds to 1.503%.
Losses and gains due to the Ortronic® Technology.- The Ortronic®
converters have very low losses because it only carries out 400 switchings per
second instead of the 200,000 switchings per second carried out by the PWM
inverters as consequence, the losses due to the same concepts are the following:
A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE WITH PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY
www.ortronic.com 20
Gains due to the utilization and multiplication of the reactive energy. The
only technology that utilizes the reactive energy is the Ortronic® Technology,
firstly it separates it, then it multiplies it and finally it transforms it into kilowatts,
gains that are calculated from the 100kW real installation, described in the slide
14.
These following measurements have been made in our laboratory, on a three-
phase motor, model EEF2, manufactured by WEG, 4-poles, 1,500 RPM and a
total power of 1,500 watts.
The motor described in the preceding paragraph has been connected to the
three-phase Spanish electrical grid, running with no load connected in its axis,
which is the worst possible condition for the motor’s efficiency and the results,
shown in Figure 2, have been measured with a HT Italia network analyzer,
GSC59 model, and current clamps model HT-96U, with a network analyzer
from the brand Fluke, model 435 series II and a Tektronix brand Oscilloscope,
model DPO 3054 with the DPO3PWR Power Analysis Module, obtaining in all
the cases the same results.
The measured powers are the following:
• Total Apparent Power, which means false power, measured in KVA = 1.198
KVA.
• Effective Power, the only one which can produce work, measured in kW =
0.095 kW.
• Reactive Power, invalid to produce work, measured in KVAR = 1.194 KVAR.
For this motor the power factor is
𝑘𝑊
𝐾𝑉𝐴=0.095
1.194= 0.08
And the multiplication factor is
1.194
0.095= 12.56
Power Factor: Under the point of view of the traditional knowledge that the
power factor is the highest possible due to the following reasons:
• The reactive power is higher when the power factor is lower.
• The reactive power decreases the useful power of the generator.
• The reactive power decreases the efficiency of the machinery.
A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE WITH PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY
www.ortronic.com 21
However, for the Ortronic® technology interests that the power factor has the
lowest possible value and it is something that can be modified as it is defined by:
𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 = 𝑘𝑊
𝐾𝑉𝐴=
𝑅
𝑅2 + 2𝜋𝑓𝐿 2
In the 100kW installation with a power factor of 0.08, calculated on the
previous slide, the KVAr are:
100 𝑘𝑊 𝑥 12.56 = 1,256 𝐾𝑉𝐴𝑟
And transforming the KVAr in kW with losses of a 10% we have
1,256 𝑥 0.9 = 1,130.4 𝑘𝑊 = 1,130.4%
Then, the gains due to reactive is 1,130.4 kW
To obtain these results it would be necessary to change the power factor of all
the inductive loads existing today, a fact that we consider only possible in the
countries that are not industrialized today. The countries today industrialized,
without changing the inductive loads existing today, can achieve gains between
300% and 500%.
European Efficiency. It has no relation with the Physics Laws, because it is
based only in an economic question, accepted by the European Economic
Community.
Economic explanation of the European efficiency. The PWM Inverters are
connected to the electrical grid only when the power they supply to the grid is
higher than the power they take from the grid, being this condition the one that
defines the minimum value of the European Efficiency. This efficiency is
checked by the official inspectors who check all the photovoltaic installations
connected to the electrical grids in the European Community.
Losses due to the European Efficiency. During all the time that the
photovoltaic installation is disconnected due to the European efficiency, the
100% of the power of the photovoltaic solar panels is lost and, when the power
demanded from the grid decreases from the maximum of the installation, the
losses increase, according to the calculations made in slides from 18 to 20.
These losses can be known analyzing the data of total power supplied to
the grid during a year, data which are known by the electrical companies
and the owners of the installations.
A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE WITH PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY
www.ortronic.com 22
Summary of losses and gains Ortronic® vs PWM.
LOSSES: PWM Ortronic®
Due to voltage difference: 55.6 kW 0 kW
Due to efficiency: 16 kW 1.503 kW
TOTAL 71.6 kW 1.503 kW
Difference = 71.6 – 1.503 = 70.097 kW
______________________________________________________________
GAINS: PWM Ortronic®
Due to losses difference 70.097 kW
Due to reactive power KVAr 0 kW 1130.4 kW
______________________________________________________________
ORTRONIC® vs. PWM PWM Ortronic®
Gain = 70.097 kW+1130.4 kW = 1200.497 kW
______________________________________________________________
IN PERCENTAGE OVER PWM
1200.497 𝑥 100
100−55.6=1200.497 𝑥 100
44.4= 2703.82 %
A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE WITH PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY
HEADQUARTERS
ORTRONIC TECHNOLOGY, S.L.
EDIFICIO TWIN GOLF “B”
C/ Perú, 6, 2ª Planta
28290 Las Rozas (Madrid)
Phone: (34) 91 630 80 80
www.ortronic.com