Advanced Licensing Agreements 2016a123.g.akamai.net/7/123/121311/abc123/yorkmedia... ·...
Transcript of Advanced Licensing Agreements 2016a123.g.akamai.net/7/123/121311/abc123/yorkmedia... ·...
© Practising Law Institute
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYCourse Handbook Series
Number G-1259
Advanced LicensingAgreements 2016
Volume One
Co-ChairsIra Jay LevyJoseph Yang
To order this book, call (800) 260-4PLI or fax us at (800) 321-0093. Ask ourCustomer Service Department for PLI Order Number 149263, Dept. BAV5.
Practising Law Institute1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
© Practising Law Institute
6
Licensing and Protecting Marks: In a Transactional and Digital Practice (PowerPoint slides)
Raymond R. Ferrell
Dex Media
If you find this article helpful, you can learn more about the subject by going to www.pli.edu to view the on demand program or segment for which it was written.
1-357
© Practising Law Institute
1-358
© Practising Law Institute
1
Lice
nsin
g an
d Pr
otec
ting
M
arks
In a
Tra
nsac
tiona
l and
Dig
ital P
ract
ice
Mar
ch 7
-8, 2
016
Ray
mon
d R
. Fer
rell
Exec
utiv
e Vi
ce P
resi
dent
Gen
eral
Cou
nsel
&
Cor
pora
te S
ecre
tary
1-359
© Practising Law Institute
2Join
t Ven
ture
Bra
nd L
icen
se A
rran
gem
ents
–W
hen
a lic
enso
r par
tner
s w
ith
a lic
ense
e to
refe
r cus
tom
ers
to th
e lic
ense
e, c
o-de
velo
p a
func
tiona
lity
or
ente
r int
o a
busi
ness
aim
ed a
t com
plim
entin
g a
core
bus
ines
s
A.
Und
erst
and
Bra
nd V
alue
1.
Mak
e va
luat
ion
of b
rand
s in
que
stio
n2.
Iden
tify
key
bran
d at
tribu
tes
3.D
evel
op li
cens
ing
stra
tegy
bas
ed o
n th
ese
core
prin
cipl
es
B.
The
Join
t Ven
ture
as
a Li
cens
ing
Stra
tegy
1.E
ntity
Joi
nt V
entu
res
a.E
ntity
Join
tve
ntur
esca
nbe
form
edw
hen
two
com
pani
esfo
rma
third
lega
lent
ityi.
Usu
ally
a n
ew p
rodu
ct o
r ser
vice
driv
es th
e fo
rmat
ion
of th
is
arra
ngem
ent
ii. T
he b
rand
s of
the
form
ing
entit
ies
may
pla
y a
vita
l rol
e in
es
tabl
ishi
ng th
e le
gitim
acy
of th
e ne
w v
entu
re.
I. E
xten
ding
the
Bra
nd -
Join
t Ven
ture
Dea
ls a
nd
Com
plim
enta
ry P
rodu
ct/P
latfo
rms
1-360
© Practising Law Institute
3
2. D
eal J
oint
Ven
ture
s a.
Dea
ljoi
ntve
ntur
esar
efo
rmed
whe
nco
mpa
nies
ente
rin
toan
agre
emen
tw
ithou
tthe
crea
tion
ofan
entit
yto
achi
eve
busi
ness
obje
ctiv
es.
i.A
licen
se a
gree
men
t is
at th
e ce
nter
of d
eal J
V’s
3. T
echn
olog
y as
a D
river
a. T
echn
olog
y ca
n dr
ive
prod
uct d
evel
opm
ents
and
the
bran
d ca
n be
us
ed to
cem
ent t
he p
artn
ersh
ip.
i.
A c
atal
yst f
or e
ntity
and
dea
l JV
’s is
tech
nolo
gy.
Exte
ndin
g th
e B
rand
-Jo
int V
entu
re D
eals
and
C
ompl
imen
tary
Pro
duct
/Pla
tform
s
1-361
© Practising Law Institute
4
Exte
ndin
g th
e B
rand
-Jo
int V
entu
re D
eals
and
C
ompl
imen
tary
Pro
duct
/Pla
tform
s
C.L
icen
sing
the
Bra
nd in
Con
nect
ion
with
Com
plim
enta
ry P
rodu
cts/
Plat
form
s
1.Th
eiP
odE
xam
ple
a.Fo
cus
onco
reca
pabi
litie
san
dal
low
third
–par
ties
tode
velo
pan
dm
arke
tco
mpl
imen
tary
acce
ssor
ies
that
use
the
iPod
bran
d
2.Th
eIn
telI
nsid
eE
xam
ple
a.U
sing
“Ingr
edie
ntB
rand
ing”
and
licen
sing
tom
ake
the
trans
isto
rm
ore
valu
able
and
less
ofa
com
mod
ity
3.M
obile
App
san
dB
rand
Lice
nsin
gIs
sues
a.M
obile
app
expl
osio
ni.
App
roxi
mat
ely
1.5
milli
onan
d1.
6m
illion
inth
eA
pple
and
Goo
gle
app
stor
esre
spec
tivel
yas
ofJu
ly,20
15,t
rem
endo
usgr
owth
and
popu
larit
ya.
Key
cons
ider
atio
nsfo
rthe
bran
dow
ner/a
ppde
velo
per
i.Th
ebr
oad
licen
sean
din
dem
nitie
sgi
ven
toth
em
obile
devi
cem
aker
ii.Sc
ope
oflic
ense
gran
tsof
third
party
app
com
pone
nts
iii.C
ount
erfe
itap
psm
isus
ing
the
bran
dow
ner’s
bran
d(s)
1-362
© Practising Law Institute
5
Exte
ndin
g th
e B
rand
-Jo
int V
entu
re D
eals
and
C
ompl
imen
tary
Pro
duct
/Pla
tform
s
D.
How
Bra
nds
Are
Use
din
JVD
eals
and
Com
plim
enta
ryPr
oduc
t/Pla
tform
s1.
Pro
mot
iona
lMat
eria
l–m
arks
can
beus
edin
the
deal
sde
scrib
edab
ove
inth
epr
omot
iona
lmat
eria
lsfo
rthe
obje
ctpr
oduc
tor
serv
ice
2.P
rodu
ct/S
ervi
ceId
entif
icat
ion
-mar
ksca
nbe
used
toid
entif
yth
eob
ject
prod
uct
orse
rvic
ean
dto
diffe
rent
iate
the
resp
ectiv
epa
rties
3.W
ebsi
tes
–W
ebsi
tes
can
mai
ntai
nth
elo
okan
dfe
elan
dbr
and
ofth
elic
enso
r
1-363
© Practising Law Institute
6
II. H
ow to
Pro
tect
the
Bra
nd a
nd M
arks
How
to P
rote
ct th
e B
rand
as
a M
ark
: The
Qua
lity
Con
trol
Impe
rativ
e
A.
Qua
lity
Con
trol
in M
ark
Prot
ectio
n1.
Avo
idin
g th
e na
ked
licen
se a
nd a
band
onm
ent
B.
Lice
nse
Prov
isio
ns
1.G
rant
Lim
itatio
nsa.
Non
excl
usiv
e vs
. Exc
lusi
veb.
Term
vs.
Per
petu
alc.
Non
-tran
sfer
able
vs.
Tra
nsfe
rabl
ed.
Wor
ldw
ide
vs. G
eogr
aphi
c R
estri
ctio
n
2.U
se R
estri
ctio
nsa.
Mod
ifica
tions
and
impr
ovem
ents
b. R
ever
se e
ngin
eerin
g, d
ecom
pilin
g, d
isas
sem
blin
g (s
oftw
are)
c. D
istri
butio
n or
use
by
third
par
ties
d. C
opyi
ng, m
ergi
nge.
Der
ivat
ive
wor
ks
1-364
© Practising Law Institute
7
How
to P
rote
ct th
e B
rand
and
Mar
ks
C.
Oth
er P
rote
ctio
n M
etho
ds a
nd Is
sues
to A
ddre
ss
1. C
onse
nt P
rovi
sion
s –
can
only
use
mar
k w
ith p
rior w
ritte
n co
nsen
t fo
r eve
ry u
se o
r eve
ry ty
pe o
f use
.
2. M
arke
ting
Com
mitt
ee –
form
ed w
hen
the
licen
sor a
nd li
cens
ee
crea
te a
com
mitt
ee to
revi
ew th
e us
es o
f the
lice
nsor
’s b
rand
whe
re
the
licen
sor i
s no
t con
fiden
t in
the
licen
see’
s ab
ility
to a
bide
by
the
llic
ense
rest
rictio
ns d
ue to
the
licen
see’
s st
art-u
p st
atus
or l
ack
of
reso
urce
s.
3. B
rand
Gui
delin
es –
may
incl
ude
com
plia
nce
with
bra
nd g
uide
lines
in
the
use
rest
rictio
ns
1-365
© Practising Law Institute
8
How
to P
rote
ct th
e B
rand
and
Mar
ks
4. U
nder
stan
d an
d A
ddre
ss th
e Im
pact
of P
oten
tially
Con
fusi
ng, D
amag
ing
and
Dilu
tive
Pra
ctic
esa.
Key
wor
d/A
dwor
dsA
dver
tisin
g by
Com
petit
ors
i. D
efin
ition
-wor
ds o
r ter
ms
used
to tr
igge
r sea
rch
resu
lts in
sea
rch
engi
nes.
Ow
ners
of m
arks
, as
wel
l as
thos
e lo
okin
g to
com
pete
with
or
leve
rage
the
mar
k, m
ay u
se k
eyw
ord/
adw
ords
adve
rtisi
ng to
atte
mpt
to
driv
e cu
stom
ers
to th
eir s
ites
from
sea
rch
engi
nes.
ii. C
ases
–in
a s
erie
s of
cas
es p
rimar
ily in
volv
ing
the
Goo
gle
Adw
ords
prog
ram
, cou
rts h
ave
perm
itted
third
-par
ties
to b
id o
n th
e tra
dem
ark
term
s of
bra
nd o
wne
rs a
s lo
ng a
s th
e tra
dem
ark
is n
ot u
sed
in th
e
th
ird-p
arty
’s a
ds. T
he e
mer
ging
con
sens
us s
ugge
sts
that
offe
ring
for
sale
or s
ellin
g ke
ywor
ds is
a “u
se in
com
mer
ce,”
but t
he p
lain
tiff s
till
need
s to
pro
ve li
kelih
ood
of c
onfu
sion
. (R
escu
ecom
Cor
p. v
. Goo
gle,
Inc.
, 56
2 F.
3d 1
23, 1
28-3
0 (2
nd C
ir. 2
009)
(citi
ng 1
-800
Con
tact
s, 3
09 F
. Sup
p. 2
d at
40
8-12
) (se
e, fo
r exa
mpl
es, E
dina
Rea
lty In
c. v
. The
MLS
onlin
e.co
m, N
o. 0
4-43
71, 2
006
WL
7370
64, a
t *3
(D. M
inn.
Mar
ch 2
0, 2
006)
; 800
-JR
Cig
ar, I
nc. v
. G
oTo.
com
, Inc
., 43
7 F.
Sup
p. 2
d 27
3 (D
.N.J
. 200
6); R
oset
ta S
tone
Ltd
. v.
Goo
gle,
Inc.
, 730
F. S
upp.
2d
531
(E.D
. Va.
201
0), v
acat
ed in
par
t on
othe
r gr
ound
s, 6
76 F
.3d
144
(4th
Cir.
201
2).
1-366
© Practising Law Institute
9
How
to P
rote
ct th
e B
rand
and
Mar
ks
a. K
eyw
ord/
Adw
ords
Adv
ertis
ing
by C
ompe
titor
sii.
Cas
es (c
ont’d
) –G
ener
ally
cou
rts h
ave
held
that
the
mer
e pr
actic
e of
se
lling
and
usin
g th
ird p
arty
trad
emar
ks a
s ke
ywor
ds is
unl
ikel
y to
cau
se
conf
usio
n an
d no
n-in
fring
ing,
par
ticul
arly
whe
n th
e re
sulti
ng s
pons
ored
ad
s do
not
dis
play
the
plai
ntiff
’s tr
adem
ark
(see
1-8
00 C
onta
cts,
Inc.
v.
Lens
.com
, Inc
., 72
2 F.
3d 1
229
(10t
h C
ir. 2
013)
; Net
wor
k A
utom
atio
n, In
c. v
. A
dvan
ced
Sys
tem
Con
cept
s, 6
38 F
.3d
1137
(9th
Cir.
201
1); A
llied
Inte
rsta
te L
LC v
. K
imm
el &
Silv
erm
an P
.C.,
No.
12
Civ.
420
4, 2
013
WL
4245
987
(S.D
.N.Y
. 201
3); b
ut
see
Bin
der v
. Dis
abili
ty G
roup
, Inc
., 77
2 F.
Sup
p. 2
d 11
72 (C
.D. C
al. 2
011)
) ..iii.
Issu
e–
The
need
to m
onito
r use
of t
he b
rand
ow
ner’s
bra
nd b
y th
ose
en
gage
d in
key
wor
d/ad
wor
dsad
verti
sing
to in
sure
bra
nd is
not
bei
ng
used
in a
man
ner n
ot p
rote
cted
und
er c
urre
nt c
ase
law
and
the
term
s of
a
sear
ch e
ngin
e’s
keyw
ords
pro
gram
.iv.
Lic
ensi
ng Im
plic
atio
ns–
Cur
rent
ly, s
earc
h en
gine
s ha
ve k
eyw
ords
po
licie
s th
at w
ould
allo
w a
lice
nsee
to b
id o
n th
e lic
enso
r/bra
nd o
wne
r’s
bran
d in
con
nect
ion
with
:•
Sellin
g ge
nuin
e go
ods
or s
ervi
ces
unde
r the
mar
k,•
Sel
ling
parts
or p
rodu
cts
that
are
com
patib
le w
ith
good
s or
ser
vice
s un
der t
he m
ark,
•P
rovi
ding
info
rmat
ion
abou
t goo
ds o
r ser
vice
s un
der
the
mar
k
1-367
© Practising Law Institute
10
How
to P
rote
ct th
e B
rand
and
Mar
ks
v. N
ovel
Cou
nter
Key
wor
ds S
trate
gy–
In re
spon
se to
the
perc
eive
d in
abilit
y to
blo
ck c
ompe
titor
s fro
m le
vera
ging
the
equi
ty o
f a fa
mou
s br
and,
my
clie
nts
and
I dev
ised
a u
niqu
e st
rate
gy to
com
bat c
ompe
titiv
e ke
ywor
d/ad
wor
dad
verti
sing
. We
licen
sed
the
right
to b
id o
n th
e fa
mou
s m
arks
to s
elec
t “su
per a
ffilia
tes”
from
our
onl
ine
affil
iate
pro
gram
. In
this
w
ay w
e co
uld
insu
re th
at th
e us
e of
the
fam
ous
mar
ks b
enef
ited
the
bran
d ow
ner b
y dr
ivin
g tra
ffic
to o
ur s
ite th
roug
h ou
r sup
er a
ffilia
tes.
The
lik
elih
ood
of c
ompe
titiv
e ad
verti
sing
bei
ng tr
igge
red
thro
ugh
sear
ches
de
crea
sed
as a
resu
lt.
.
1-368
© Practising Law Institute
11
How
to P
rote
ct th
e B
rand
and
Mar
ks
b. g
TLD
Cyb
ersq
uatti
ng–
Ano
ther
thre
at to
bra
nd o
wne
rs is
cyb
ersq
uatti
ng.
i. D
efin
ition
-inv
olve
s th
e re
gist
ratio
n of
dom
ain
nam
es in
corp
orat
ing
wel
l-kno
wn
trade
mar
ks a
nd b
rand
nam
es, w
ith th
e ai
m o
f sel
ling
them
to
the
right
ful o
wne
r for
a h
igh
pric
e.
ii. Is
sue
-In
the
past
, bra
nd o
wne
rs w
ere
limite
d to
pur
suin
g do
mai
n-na
me
pira
tes
usin
g th
e re
lativ
ely
ill-fit
ting
doct
rines
of t
rade
mar
k in
fring
emen
t and
dilu
tion.
In re
spon
se, I
CA
NN
cre
ated
dis
pute
re
solu
tion
proc
edur
es a
nd C
ongr
ess
pass
ed th
e AC
PA. T
hen
in 2
011,
IC
AN
N in
trodu
ced
addi
tiona
l dis
pute
pro
cedu
res
and
safe
guar
ds a
head
of
the
activ
atio
n of
hun
dred
s of
new
gTL
Ds
that
are
exp
ecte
d to
incr
ease
do
mai
n na
me
disp
utes
.iii.
Lic
ensi
ng Im
plic
atio
ns–
the
bran
d ow
ner s
houl
d ca
refu
lly d
eter
min
e w
hat r
ight
s it
will
give
its
licen
sees
to u
se m
arks
as
dom
ain
nam
es, a
nd
cont
inue
to m
onito
r usa
ge to
insu
re c
ompl
ianc
e an
d qu
ality
con
trol.
.
1-369
© Practising Law Institute
12
5. A
dditi
onal
Bra
nd P
rote
ctio
n M
easu
res
–ot
her m
easu
res
can
be u
sed
to g
uard
aga
inst
abu
se o
f mar
ks b
y no
n-lic
ensi
ng th
ird-p
artie
s; th
ese
met
hods
ca
n al
so b
e us
ed to
insu
re c
ompl
ianc
e by
lice
ncee
s.
a.D
omai
n N
ame
Wat
ch –
Thom
pson
and
Tho
mps
onb.
Web
sw
eeps
c.C
ease
and
Des
ist L
ette
r, an
d Fo
llow
Ups
d.W
e K
now
You
’re O
ut T
here
Let
ter
e.M
onito
r Lis
tf.
Enf
orce
men
t act
ions
How
to P
rote
ct th
e B
rand
and
Mar
ks
1-370
© Practising Law Institute
13Soci
al M
edia
–re
fers
to a
var
iety
of I
nter
net b
ased
form
s of
com
mun
icat
ion
and
inte
ract
ion,
incl
udin
g bl
ogs,
wik
kis
and
peer
to p
eer p
latfo
rms
like
Face
book
, Tw
itter
, Ins
tagr
am, S
napC
hat,
and
YouT
ube,
that
util
ize
the
band
with
offe
red
by W
eb 2
.0 a
nd b
eyon
d pe
rmit
the
crea
tion
and
exch
ange
of
use
r gen
erat
ed c
onte
nt.
A.
Soci
al M
edia
Pla
tform
s an
d B
rand
Opp
ortu
nitie
s an
d C
halle
nges
-S
ocia
l med
ia p
latfo
rms
can
also
allo
w b
rand
s to
inte
ract
dire
ctly
with
con
sum
ers
pres
entin
g an
inco
mpa
rabl
e br
andi
ng o
ppor
tuni
ty. B
ut, w
ith e
very
opp
ortu
nity
ther
e ar
e ris
ks a
nd c
halle
nges
, par
ticul
arly
from
a tr
adem
ark
prot
ectio
n st
andp
oint
, in
clud
ing
whe
n th
e br
and
owne
r mus
t be
cogn
izan
t of t
he s
ocia
l med
ia p
rese
nce
of
the
licen
see
and
use
by c
onsu
mer
s an
d em
ploy
ees.
Hav
ing
cons
umer
s an
d em
ploy
ees
com
mun
icat
e ab
out b
rand
s is
a b
enef
it fo
r com
pani
es; b
ut w
hat i
f co
nsum
ers
or e
mpl
oyee
s m
isus
e m
arks
?
III. L
icen
sing
and
Pro
tect
ing
Mar
ks –
Soci
al M
edia
1-371
© Practising Law Institute
14
Lice
nsin
g an
d Pr
otec
ting
Mar
ks –
Soci
al M
edia
Ove
r 645
milli
on T
witt
er a
ccou
nts.
–G
row
ing
at th
e ra
te o
f 11
–ac
coun
ts p
er s
econ
d.
Ove
r an
hour
of v
ideo
is u
ploa
ded
to
YouT
ube
ever
y se
cond
.–
60 h
ours
per
min
ute
–A
deca
de e
very
day
–A
cent
ury
ever
y te
n da
ys.
–4.
9 m
illion
vid
eos
view
ed p
er d
ay in
54
lang
uage
s
1-372
© Practising Law Institute
15
1. B
usin
ess
Par
tner
s an
d S
ocia
l Med
ia-t
he b
rand
ow
ner m
ay li
cens
e th
e br
and
unde
r som
e of
the
scen
ario
s de
scrib
ed in
Sec
tion
I, an
d in
turn
, the
lice
nsee
may
le
vera
ge s
ocia
l med
ia p
latfo
rms
to p
rom
ote
itsel
f and
its
prod
ucts
and
ser
vice
s.a.
Key
Opp
ortu
nitie
si.
Vira
l pro
mot
ion
and
mar
ketin
g –
use
soci
al m
edia
pla
tform
s to
igni
te th
e po
pula
rity
of a
bra
nd o
r bra
nds
and
prod
ucts
and
ser
vice
s.
ii. P
ositi
ve U
GC
–le
vera
ge p
ositi
ve c
omm
ents
and
so
cial
med
ia p
latfo
rms.
U
se s
ocia
l med
ia v
erna
cula
r and
hum
or to
adv
anta
ge.
b. K
ey C
halle
nges
i. FT
C R
egul
atio
ns-N
ew F
TC re
gula
tions
requ
ire th
at a
ll pr
omot
ions
com
ply
with
the
late
st “.
com
dis
clos
ures
.”ii.
CD
C L
iabi
lity
–lia
bilit
y an
d po
tent
ial d
efen
se fo
r con
tent
pos
ted
on a
co
mpa
ny’s
site
. (S
ectio
n 23
0 Im
mun
izat
ion)
No
imm
uniz
atio
n w
hen
com
pany
al
ters
the
cont
ent,
as in
dro
p-do
wn
men
u fo
r roo
mm
ate
sele
ctio
n -F
air H
ousi
ng
Cou
ncil
of S
an F
erna
ndo
Valle
y v.
Roo
mm
ates
.com
LLC
, 521
F.3
d 11
57 (9
th C
ir.
2008
) (en
banc
).
Lice
nsin
g an
d Pr
otec
ting
Mar
ks –
Soci
al M
edia
1-373
© Practising Law Institute
16
ii. D
MC
A Li
abilit
y / C
opyr
ight
and
Tra
dem
ark
viol
atio
ns –
Sec
tion
512(
c)
of th
e D
MC
A in
sula
tes
agai
nst l
iabi
lity
for c
opyr
ight
infri
ngem
ent.
Com
pany
mus
t act
to ta
ke d
own
only
whe
n it
has
“spe
cific
and
in
dent
ifiab
lekn
owle
dge
of in
fring
emen
t of p
artic
ular
indi
vidu
al it
ems.
” Vi
acom
Inte
rnat
iona
l Inc
. v. Y
ouTu
be, I
nc.,
No.
07-
2103
, (S
.D.N
.Y.,
June
23
, 201
0) (1
5 E
CLR
100
31, 6
/30/
10).
iii. C
AN
-SPA
M –
mus
t und
erst
and
that
Fac
eboo
k an
d ot
her s
ocia
l ne
twor
king
com
mer
cial
pos
ts m
ay b
e su
bjec
t to
the
CA
N S
PAM
Act
.
Lice
nsin
g an
d Pr
otec
ting
Mar
ks –
Soci
al M
edia
1-374
© Practising Law Institute
17
2. C
usto
mer
s an
d S
ocia
l Med
ia -
the
bran
d ow
ner m
ay li
cens
e th
e br
and
unde
r so
me
of th
e sc
enar
ios
desc
ribed
in S
ectio
n I,
and
in tu
rn, t
he li
cens
ee m
ay
leve
rage
soc
ial m
edia
pla
tform
s to
eng
age
cust
omer
s.a.
Key
Opp
ortu
nitie
si.
Cus
tom
er D
riven
Pro
mos
–cu
stom
ers
may
initi
ate
soci
al m
edia
pr
omos
of a
love
d pr
oduc
t or s
ervi
ce th
at re
sona
tes
ii. E
ngag
ing
Exi
stin
g an
d P
oten
tial C
usto
mer
s –
licen
sor a
nd li
cens
ee
may
use
the
mos
t app
ropr
iate
soc
ial p
latfo
rms
to o
rgan
ical
ly in
tera
ct,
invi
te, a
nd in
cent
iviz
e cu
rrent
and
pot
entia
l cus
tom
ers.
b. K
ey C
halle
nges
i. C
yber
squa
tting
and
gTL
DIs
sues
–as
ana
lyze
d ea
rlier
ii.
Neg
ativ
e U
GC
–m
onito
r neg
ativ
e co
mm
ents
(d
aily
com
pany
up
date
s).
Und
erst
and
Firs
t Am
endm
ent d
efen
ses.
iii. C
opyr
ight
Infri
ngem
ent I
ssue
s–
mus
t mon
itor t
o lim
it ex
posu
re fr
om
cont
ent u
sed
with
out p
rope
r lic
ense
s.
Lice
nsin
g an
d Pr
otec
ting
Mar
ks –
Soci
al M
edia
1-375
© Practising Law Institute
18
3. E
mpl
oyee
s an
d S
ocia
l Med
ia -
the
bran
d ow
ner m
ay li
cens
e th
e br
and
unde
r so
me
of th
e sc
enar
ios
desc
ribed
in S
ectio
n I,
and
in tu
rn, t
he li
cens
ee a
nd/o
r the
licen
sor m
ay le
vera
ge s
ocia
l med
ia p
latfo
rms
to e
ngag
e th
eir r
espe
ctiv
e
empl
oyee
s.a.
Key
Opp
ortu
nitie
s i.
Soc
ial M
edia
Pol
icy
–us
e to
lay
out w
hat e
mpl
oyee
s ca
n an
d ca
nnot
do
on
soci
al m
edia
pla
tform
s -c
an b
e an
ass
et a
nd h
elp
redu
ce e
xpos
ure
to a
buse
s.ii.
Bet
ter E
mpl
oyer
to E
mpl
oyee
Com
mun
icat
ion
-Em
ploy
er s
pons
ored
blo
gs
can
help
incr
ease
col
labo
ratio
n an
d pr
oduc
tivity
bet
wee
n di
spar
ate
wor
k te
ams.
E
mpl
oyer
spo
nsor
ed F
aceb
ook
and
Twitt
er p
ages
can
dis
sem
inat
e em
ploy
eein
form
atio
n.iii.
Eng
age
form
er e
mpl
oyee
s in
mea
ning
ful a
nd h
elpf
ul w
ays
-Use
soc
ial m
edia
to
eng
age
on k
ey is
sues
(e.g
. ret
irem
ent b
enef
its, c
onsu
lting
).iv.
Com
mun
icat
e on
pro
ject
s an
d ho
w to
pro
tect
I.P.
ass
ets
-Can
use
ent
erpr
ise
soci
al n
etw
orks
, blo
gs, w
ikki
s(e
.g.,
Cha
tter a
nd Y
amm
er).
III. L
icen
sing
and
Pro
tect
ing
Mar
ks –
Soci
al M
edia
1-376
© Practising Law Institute
19
b. K
ey C
halle
nges
i. B
rand
Mis
appr
opria
tion
and
Mis
use
and
Ow
ners
hip
Issu
es–
Em
ploy
ees
of
licen
sor a
nd li
cens
ee m
ay m
isus
e th
e br
and
and
may
cre
ate
soci
al m
edia
pag
es
that
they
atte
mpt
to ta
ke o
wne
rshi
p of
.ii.
Los
s of
Con
fiden
tial I
nfor
mat
ion
-Cam
eras
, cut
ting
and
past
ing
and
reco
rdin
g ta
ke o
n ne
w m
eani
ng in
the
Web
. 2.0
and
bey
ond
wor
ld –
bew
are
of th
eft,
mis
use
and
expo
sure
of t
rade
sec
rets
or s
ensi
tive
data
.iii.
NLR
B C
ases
-A
serie
s of
rece
nt s
ettle
men
ts s
ugge
st s
ocia
l med
ia p
olic
ies
ca
nnot
rest
rict w
orke
rs’ r
ight
s to
dis
cuss
hou
rs, w
ages
and
wor
king
con
ditio
ns.
III. L
icen
sing
and
Pro
tect
ing
Mar
ks –
Soci
al M
edia
1-377
© Practising Law Institute
20
1.K
now
the
valu
e of
you
r bra
nd o
r mar
k an
d w
hat i
t con
note
s.2.
Leve
rage
thes
e co
re p
rinci
ples
to d
evel
op th
e ap
prop
riate
lice
nsin
g st
rate
gy.
3.C
lear
ly d
escr
ibe
the
role
and
lim
its p
lace
d on
a li
cens
ee w
hen
usin
g th
e lic
enso
r's m
ark.
a.M
ust u
nder
stan
d pa
rtner
’s s
tatu
s (e
.g.,
a st
art-u
p or
mat
ure
com
pany
)4.
Em
ploy
robu
st L
icen
se G
rant
s an
d R
estri
ctio
ns5.
Be
awar
e of
how
new
tech
nolo
gy (e
.g.,
mob
ile a
pps
and
soci
al m
edia
) can
pr
ovid
e ne
w o
ppor
tuni
ties
or in
valid
ate
your
lega
l and
bus
ines
s as
sum
ptio
ns a
nd fo
rm p
olic
ies,
pro
cedu
res
and
prot
ectio
ns a
ccor
ding
ly.
6.S
eek
crea
tive
busi
ness
sol
utio
ns w
hen
lega
l red
ress
is u
ncer
tain
or
unav
aila
ble
(e.g
. use
of “
supe
r affi
liate
s” to
com
bat t
he k
eyw
ord/
adw
ord
prob
lem
.)
Sum
mar
y –
6 Ta
keaw
ays
1-378
© Practising Law Institute
NOTES
1-379
© Practising Law Institute
NOTES
1-380